Albin Countergambit Nuclear Powered Ballistic Missile Submarine Variation
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 жов 2024
- The first 1,000 visitors will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare: skl.sh/bosnian...
One of the most common mistakes that inexperienced chess players make is accepting the Queen’s Gambit. Unbeknownst to them, this is a fatal mistake that exposes them to dangers such as nuclear warheads and supersonic interceptor aircraft including Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-31 Foxhound supersonic interceptor aircraft carrying Kh-47 air-launched ballistic missiles. Declining the Queen’s Gambit offers black a broad array of counterattacks, and the Albin Countergambit and this modern variation of the Lasker Trap is an effective continuation to easily gain a developmental and material advantage in chess. The Albin Countergambit is a sharp opening that can be played in response to the Queens Gambit, and its relative obscurity coerces the opponent to walk right into your sophisticated trap, allowing you to easily counter-attack using common chess tactics such as nuclear-powered submarines.
Instagram: / bosnianapesociety - Фільми й анімація
The counter is to impose the sanctions early game so that they can't afford the submarine
Alternatively, develop advanced anti-submarine surface effect vehicles, like the VVA-14, to effectively counter enemy submarines before they strike.
u read more than just the entire board.
Or you prepare in advance with keeping plenty of polarbears around with welding licenses that'll enter the submarine and eat everyone onboard the same instant they break the ice
@@Hotchpotchsoup that is just illogical this is chess you know, not checkers
@@Hotchpotchsoup but the sun would've already broken the ice.
As a former submariner, I have lost track of the number of chess games wherein I've been deployed to the endgame.
which one was your favorite?
I can speak on his behalf, as part of the crew onboard SNLE-3G Triumphant class submarine I have personal experience of firing 110 Kiloton MIRV
three stage Solid-fuel rockets. My favourite must’ve been off the Siberian coast wherein we were deployed to fire a long range Sea-ground-Strategic-Ballistic missile towards Mongolian chess master Gonchigiin Chalkhaasüren
@@randomdude2229 that was an epic move. We (the submarine community) were completely a'buzz, discussing the finesse of your targeting. A brilliant gambit!
My personal favorite, though, was the multiple T-LAM barrage launched against Viswanathan Anand during the Charbonneau - Anand match during the 37th Chess Olympiad in 2006. An extremely efficient and unexpected gambit, resulting in a major upset.
We were high-fiving each other in Control.
@@lairdcummings9092 has it ever failed?
@@cricketcoop2038 not yet.
One of these days, though, I anticipate some Chess Master is going to deploy an anti-ballistic missile defense system, and all the rules will change.
Finally, my game of chess will never be ruined by active radar and heat seeking countermeasures.
Thanks BAS!
heat seeking countermeasures?
Don't you mean Vikram Rahul Abishek Pranav Rajesh?
"active radar and heat seeking countermeasures" hmmmmm
@@christerjackson9589 everybody gansta untill the countermeasures attack back
@@gridgraphics9047 holy fuck
This is a Grand Master level move right there
I'm glad the grandmaster is back, only then will I know the true secrets of chess
I think its. A joke for a second then its an actual master
yo. the government and law toppling
mastermind himself
Well of course it is, he is GM Vikram Rahul Abhishek Pranav Rajesh
I say: just nuke em
I love how this is both a joke and really good chess advice
Yeah
not really, no one falls for the lasker trap except total beginners with 3 digit rankings
@@domvasta I'm rated 1600 in rapid & fell for it yesterday lol, that's why I'm here.
@@Debre.I'm 500 elo 💀
@@casacasablanca7026when you translate elo it becomes years old
I'm so glad that Master Rajesh is still teaching chess strategies. I know that his tactics are a little divisive among chess players for their somewhat unusual pieces, but they are absolutely worth a try. They've completely changed how I play chess.
I'm very appreciative of Master Rajesh as well. I was losing every chess match until he taught me how to automatically and simultaneously mass produce and ignite antimatter bombs on demand at the chess table. Now my next battle should result in a draw!
He taught me everything I know, even how to launch a tsar bomba at the enemy, after they fall for my open king gambit, though my favorite gambit is the kings stand, bites the dust variant, allowing me to rewind time after my king gets its identity found out, effectively killing who found it out in the process.
Please say his full name Grand Master Vikram Rahul Abhishek Pranav Rajesh.
My name is Abhishek lol
He’s streets ahead, bro.
Don’t you hate it when you’re peacefully playing chess and then you get hit by a ballistic missile?
Yeah!
happens to me every time. now my insurance company doesnt want to hear any of our valid statements anymore : v
yea it happened to my buddy once
I always get hit with a ballistic submarine, does that make me better or worse?
I do, happened for the 4th time this month.
The perfect counter to the intercontinental ballistic missile gambit
Ah yes...developing the board into the secret fourth phase of a chess game - the cold war phase, where both black and white engage in manipulating players from other chess boards to battle each other for political control.
I was building a proof of concept ABM with a litre of Mountain Dew inside the warhead
the Gushing Granny Advanced Interceptor Missile System
The best part is that it's basically the same tactic!
@@michaelmoccio2225 exactly
to create a game that plays chess like this, POLITICAL CHESS is the name it could be
The Civilization games are probably the closest to Political Chest
Don't worry, it is a thing and we're the pawns.
@@comaiscool nah, we r the black n white tiles
@@comaiscool im 14 and this is deep
If someone actually made a game like this it would probably be so popular
Putin: "Hello, Zelensky, wanna play chess?"
Zelensky: "Why not?"
The tutorial Putin watched:
Dang it was just gonna comment that they should settle it over a game of Chess
Putin: *wondering how he is still losing*
@@VivaLaVida_042 Zelensky: who watched the tutorial aswell and used the (Earthquake bomb) countergambit
@@VivaLaVida_042 He was playing as white
@@VivaLaVida_042 Putin wondering why everyone thinks he is losing when he has 20% of their territory already
came for funny plane animations, stayed for actual fantastic chess strategy
“Impose economic sanctions”
*OF COURSE WHY DIDNT I THINK OF THAT*
The best part about the video is other than the nuclear warhead, Ohio class submarines and the MIRV-equipped RS-28 Sarmat is that I'm learning some actual chess strategy with the Lasker trap in the Albin Countergambit
IKR?
Yes
Qiqi
Qiqi
@@kunashki1 yes qiqi
“Make nuclear-powered submarines, not war!”
-Gandhi, 1861
Civilization 5
Ghandi you smf!!! Civilization 5 damn warmonger : v
"There is no shame in deterrence!"
@@tokenfinnishguy8714 Great minds think alike!
"make 5 nukes, i ain't taking part in this war!"
- Ghandi, 2123
I love how this actually teaches real chess strategies before the actual joke begins
What joke?
@@allenqueen my apologies, the government haccked my brain whiilee i was typing this coomment. my ccomment was merer propagandad to prootecct the massse from such a poowerful strrategy.
I recently bought a chess set. I was wondering what the Ohio class submarine was for. Thanks, Ape!
One has to wonder how much joy he gets out of fully saying the exact proper name of every single piece of military equipment that he references in his videos. I don't know why but it just makes me laugh every time.
Precision is necessary _and_ fun.
It's a robot voice.
He's using an app called narrator's voice, it's not his own voice.
@@roastedficus6227 r/woooosh
For me it’s the super serious monotone robot voice and the accent.
Well, time to use this strategy against the bots I play against to feel like I’m good at chess. Maybe I’ll face Magnus Carlsen some day with this tactic. At least Norway doesn’t have bad boi missiles
Dead channel lol
@@sandy42069 dead comment lol.
@@saadkhalid7259 dead reply lol
@@badgermcbadger1968 dead reply to my already dead reply lol
What?
Upon learning the counter defense, I have successfully turned the tide of every match I have with my friend, who possess at least 100 Minuteman ballistic intercontinental nuclear missiles. This is truly a lifesaver.
Well that was close
Little do you know that the opponent possesses 150 single-stage, solid-fuelled motor Terminal High Altitude Area Defence mobile anti-ballistic missile system with Indium-antimonide imaging infrared seeker head to detect and shoot down your 100 Minuteman ballistic intercontinental nuclear missile. Turning the table and forcing you into a checkmate.
Amateur mistake.
@@aconite72 The thing is, I don't own that vast collection of Minuteman ballistic intercontinental nuclear missiles, my friend does.
Rush reading is an amateur mistake.
@@rollsroycegriffon2375 it’s a joke bro chill
@@aconite72 Aye man, it's fine.
As a chess player myself, I can admit this tutorial was quite informative
RS28 Sarmat Liquid-propellant multiple-independently-targetable-reentry-vehicle-equipped-super-heavy intercontinental ballistic missile 3:30
Your final move was actually during your opponent’s turn. That is an incredible blunder, as FIDE will be forced to impose economic sanctions, if not deploying 10 battalions of peacekeeping troops to your home as well.
Actually it's apperantly fine as FIDE is a turn too late and black has just enough time to unleash his Ohio-class nuclear powered-submarine armed with UGM-133A Trident II submarine launched ballisitic missiles, destroying the enemy king before FIDE is able to found the international coalition
Can peacekeeping troups occupy the same square as an existing peace keeping troup? Or do you think that might start a fight?
Actually the move is legal, as the submarine can move independently from the board pieces, it’s only illegal if it launched the missiles.
@@matthewyabsley they are both useless so it becomes an empty space
But by then Black will have already won despite all sanctions most likely. A risky move if White is able to hold back the submarine for long enough but still a good one
Back then: poor animations
Now: *Has better cgi than some movies*
The poor animation quality is what made it even funnier sometimes
Its real actually
@@fivehundred_cigarettes agree!
Its evolving
Our baby is growing soo fast
Holy man that ending was actually class. You always add a relevant plot twist at the end of these. Tbh although i was on my guard I can whole heartedly admit that I wasn't expecting the sub to surface under the board, at first I though it was the whole area getting chernobyl'd but nope just a nuclear sub casually yeeting itself from under the ice
What you get for playing on the Artic polar ice-sheet. I prefer to meet my opponents on the Ross permanent ice-shelf of the Antarctic, where Ohio's and Typhoon's dare not enter.
@@mikhailiagacesa3406 understandable, but what if your opponent initiates global warming tactics, giving him extra moves as long as there is still ice to melt?
Playing on solid surfaces makes you susceptible by bomber aircraft and battle tanks. I usually play in the vacuum of space
@@gabrielmalta1962 Playing chess in the vacuum of space makes you susceptible to solar coronal mass ejections of hot magnetised plasma consisting of electrons and protons, that can reach velocities of 3200 km/s. Hence I prefer to play chess 20 km under the lunar regolith.
@@cyan39miku You have a point. However, playing chess underneath the moon's surface makes you susceptible to damage caused by the shockwave of asteroid impacts. I'd advocate for playing inside your nearest black hole instead
I want to extend a great thank you to Grand Master Vikram Rahul Abishek Pranav Rajesh. Without him and his wonderful guidance, I would never have been able to defend against these powerful ballistic missiles that continually ruin my highly-anticipated games of chess 😤
Never thought I'd see you here😂
@@KingTheShepherd bruh 😂🤪
Turns out an MIM-104 Patriot surface to air missile system can counter the KA52 Kindzal hypersonic gambit and also strike the MiG 31 aerial platform to prevent further escalation
imagine getting this recomended , after that just happend last night
Didn't a whole patriot Battery just got slapped?
@@TheNicestPig "slightly damaged" and is in no need of repairs
@@cristicdx not to mention the "proof" of said shootdown is a PETAB-500 bomb casing
@@TheNicestPig not a wargead but a part of the internal weapon assembly
At this point, I am convinced that BAS is learning 3d animation and makes these videos to test his skills.
what do you mean he makes these vidoes so we can do things such as countering a nuclear powered ballistic missile with a submarine
Nah the plot is better than any movie ive seen in decades (im 16 years old)
I mean… I think he’s already learned 3D Animation
finally. i really needed this information to successfully win a game of chess.
There is an even more amateur mistake, which is to not have an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile ready to annihilate the airbase with which the interceptor aircraft will take off from. If you reach the opening phase with the second pawn moved out, then you can instead launch your ICBM to neutralize the interceptor before he launches, thus sparing you the humiliation of getting annihilated yourself by the nuclear warhead (which would be attached to the interceptor, thus increasing the likeliness of total capitulation of the airbase).
You can then finish off the enemy with the classic all-known Intercontinental Ballistic Missile gambit like a god.
What an astounding analysis! You have my respect, sir
@@enricosimanungkalit2601 Kudos to you, sir.
Except that the ICBM mentioned in this video is outdated. Latest strategies includes using knights and some planetary hydrogen fussile ballistic missile to intercept the famous c-3 to d-4 queen strike. Shocking how this video fails to even mention it
@@syakirflynnick A rare mistake to commit, but still a great insight for the beginner
But what if the opponent counter measures with the bfg
Don't you just hate it when you get hit by a Kh-47M2 Kinzal nuclear-capable air-launched anti-ship ballistic missile launched from a Mikoyan-Gurevich Mig-31BM supersonic interceptor aircraft when you are just trying to play a game of chess
POV: you are in Ukraine
POV: you put your two rooks together
Not more than I hate it when the International Chess Federation won't sanction my purely self-defensive deployment of my RS-28 Sarmat-II Liquid Propellant MIRV-equipped superheavy ICBM over some BS technicality.
Lll
L
Ll
L
L
L
L
Ll
L
L
Lll
Lllllllll
L
L
L
L
Lllll
Ll
L
L
L
L
Llllll
Lllll
L
L
L
L
L
L
Llllllll
L
L
Ll
Ll
Lllllll
L
L
L
Lllllllll
Lllllll
Lll
L
L
L
Llll
L
L
L
Llllllll
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Lllllllllll
Llllll
Lllllll
L
Lllllll
L
L
Llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Lllllllllllllllll
Lllllllllllllllllllll
Llll2l
It's OK. I have PATRIOT system
I love how this is actually unironically useful up until the submarine part
"This enraged the military, who punished him severely."
Reminds me of Rimworld auto generated ideoligion descriptions
Nice Oversimplified reference
Oversimplified I see. "This enraged Hitlers father who punished him severly".
Oversimplified reference? There's a Tax for that
Referencing Oversimplified on a totally unrelated video is tight.
I love how he goes "we're not gonna nuke 'em this time, that's illegal" and then makes a few moves and nukes 'em.
launching an ICBM with MIRVs is illegal when you have a piece on the 8th rank, but an SLBM is fine.
This is a near-flawless strategy. I should know this. I was the chess board.
Can confirm, i was the table
Can also confirm, I was ceiling fan #3
can confirm, i was that one smoke particle rendered out of bounds from the chess board.
@@callmejees I can confirm I was the ikea
Can confirm, I was the floor
This channel is the epitome of "0 to 100 real quick" and I love it
Seriously though, I am amazed when you guys showed how you played the pawn till it got to the other side. That is some Kasparov level shit
To the esteemed Bosnian Ape Society,
I have recently beheld with great admiration and delight your most ingenious and instructive video on the Tennison Gambit Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Variation. It is a rare and sublime pleasure to witness such a masterful display of chess strategy and nuclear warfare, combined with a refined and witty sense of humor.
Your video has enlightened me on the many advantages of employing an intercontinental ballistic missile as a chess piece, as well as the various pitfalls and countermeasures that one must be aware of when facing such a formidable opponent. I have learned much from your sagacious and eloquent commentary, and I have been thoroughly entertained by your splendid animations and sound effects.
I must commend you on your originality and creativity, as well as your erudition and skill. You have elevated the art of chess to a new level of sophistication and elegance, worthy of the admiration of kings and emperors. You have also contributed to the advancement of science and technology, by demonstrating the practical applications of nuclear physics and engineering in the field of board games.
I hope that you will continue to produce such excellent and edifying videos, and that you will grace us with more of your brilliant and amusing insights. You have earned my utmost respect and gratitude, as well as my sincere friendship.
I remain, sir, your most obedient and humble servant,
Ogrilo2020
I love the fact that he was playing chess in the Siberian Arctic without even sensing the Ohio class nuclear powered submarine armed with UGM-133A Trident II submarine launched ballistic missiles. A classic blunder
Imagine if this guy, one day, just makes a completely normal chess and we just keep hoping for a nuclear missile to drop, instead it just ends in checkmate and the video ends
Am I the only one who misses the days when chess matches were only fought with rocket launchers? These modern day strategies are just getting too hard to counter.
I understand where you're coming from, I myself love the classic tactic of gathering a dozen knights for a good frontal cavalry charge, but as with all games the meta advances regardless of our personal feelings about it.
Nah I miss the era of regular small arms fire skirmishes.
Rockets? Bro, where you at? We play by slapping eachother's pieces off the board
I miss the days when I would send an actual Knight to attack an actual King.
I feel nostalgia for when instead of IBMs we had roman chariots and phalanx formations to counter the enemy's superiority.
back then, I missed the days where we had only teeth, claws or venom to defend from enemy offensives or attack our victims.
The missile knows where it is…
Can you make a tutorial on how to counter the “live hostage” strategy? Every time I play with my brother he uses that strategy and I can’t find a way around it
Just play the fentanyl gas gambit
@@jameson1239 That didn't work so well in Russia.
Or that one time in that Kiev opera house.
You might like to try rushing Special Air Service (SAS) operatives. They tend to be pretty good at getting the hostages back alive...
@@EGRJ you don’t have to worry about the hostages if there are no hostages left
I have a perfect strategy for this exact scenario - but, well...exactly how attached to your brother are you?
The funniest part, is that if you're a chess player, all these terms are real. The queen's gambit is a real opening and so is the Albin-Countergambit, lmao
And so is every piece of military technology mentioned
That's the point, to provide a good strategy then reveal military equipment as a joke.
And so is the Lasker trap
@@ARandomSpace "joke"
@@_Tao__ joke
4:15 But wait, it's possible to counter the Lasker Trap, Economic Sanction variation if you develop a completely self-sufficient industrial manufacturing chain, eliminating any weakened industrial capacity caused by the sanction and allowing black to launch MIRV-equipped RS-28 Sarmat not fearing any consequence.
That's when you start funding and arming your opponent's disenfranchised pawns to destabilise their whole region of the board (under the table of course), effectively drawing their pawns and knights away from the main conflict in order to defend the rooks, and allowing you to invade and usurp the opponent's resources and population under the guise of peacekeeping operations.
China in a nutshell
how about a double circulation economy, like what china did
time would still be of the essence, as proved by not only the Soviet Union, but even the Ottomans. eventually, the rest of the world would learn to manage without you.
In that case you'd need to purchase the RS-28 Sarmat early on in the game, third turn at latest, before your opponent can impose the sanctions on you, effectively preventing this weapon purchase. Both the economic investment and the need for safe missile storage can be a severe hindrance to making it through the Lasker trap.
There is a fatal oversight with this strategy. White had an alternative to Bxb4, which was to deploy a Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II single-seat twin-turbofan straight-wing subsonic close-air-support attack aircraft, destroying black's ability to manufacture the required UGM-133A Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missile. This in turn does not allow the Ohio-class submarine to fire, opening black's king to an attack by an Iowa-class battleship armed with a BGM-109 Tomahawk long range all-weather jet-powered subsonic cruise missile, as well as forking black's queen and knight with a Phalanx gun-based close-in weapon system. Furthermore, this gives white a window to impose economic sanctions on black, blundering black's economic stability.
"I'm going with the crab strat"
"I'm going with the intercontinental ballistic missile open"
Honestly my favorite part is how the Skillshare sponsorship doesn't even feel like it's from the same video, like it's an ad that just popped up in the middle of our chess strategy tips.
My boi Vikram Rahul Abhishek Pranav Rajesh coming in clutch once again. Perfect video; helped me solve the looming economic sanctions I was facing from my game of chess.
I will now be able to sleep easy at night, now that i can protect myself from various nuclear armaments!
The funny thing is that this is actually a good lesson on a trap against the queen’s gambit
For more advanced players, using an a-10 warthog armed with a gau-8 avenger 30mm Gatling along with a wide variety of bombs and missiles can be good as you can strategically attack the rook on a8 while also giving you time to develop more pieces and create a good pawn structure
Ah, but you see, this strategy tends to be less effective at higher levels of chess. Most professional players are skilled enough to ensure that antisubmarine warfare or ASW weapons are in place to prevent this sort of play. I personally prefer the Arleigh-Burke class destroyer with a complement of MH-60S Seahawk ASW helicopters. A deadly combination of active sonar helicopter-dropped buoys, Mark 48 torpedoes (active guidance or wake-homing work equally well) from assisting Virginia-class fast-attack submarines and an Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System should ensure that no pesky submarine launched first strike nuclear attack will penetrate your defenses.
Depending on your material situation you can also play a Russian variant of the above strategy using Udaloy-class anti-submarine warfare destroyers armed with rocket-launched anti-submarine torpedos and carrying Kamov Ka-27 ASW helicopters. Alternatively, a Chinese variant can also be played using Type 055 large stealth destroyers armed with missile-launched ASW torpedos and carrying Harbin Z-20F ASW helicopters and supported by a swarm of Type 056A ASW corvettes. If things get really desperate then the British variant can be played using Daring class destroyers. However, there is a 50% chance that none of them will be available due to engine problems and you will automatically forfeit the game at that point.
@Robert Chien Interesting proposal. However, this strategy does have its own counters. While the Iowa-class battleship's antiaircraft weapons are suitable for defense against low flying torpedo bombers, they have limited range and can thus be defeated quite easily by standoff ordinance dropped from high flying, high speed aircraft. If my nearby Nimitz-class supercarrier were to launch a squadron of F/A 18 Super Hornet multirole fighters to intercept the Iowa, they could easily disable the warship with a barrage of AGM-65 Maverick radar-guided missiles. Also, the addition of an AWACS E-3 Sentry and an F/A 18G Growler electronic warfare aircraft will lessen the threat of hostile SAM systems, should they be present.
@Robert Chien Ironically the best way to counter an Iowa in a modern setting is to use submarines. Since modern anti-ship missiles have no chance of punching through the armored citadel. The plan should be to cripple the ship with a mass missile first strike using a fleet of any modern guided-missile destroyer targeting the superstructure, this should disable all missiles and electronics systems added in the 1980s. Hopefully, this first strike also wreaked the funnels and forcing the ship to move at a reduced speed. Finally, send in a submarine to launch half a dozen heavy guided torpedos targeting the keel. This should bypass Iowa's relatively weak torpedo protection and cause uncontrollable flooding which would eventually sink the ship.
Question, I only have a sniper rifle, what is the best positioning to win with it.
Well, scratch that, I have a sniper rifle and a butter knife.
@@JediSteve-J3- the answer is not really dependant on the weapon, but rather the player.
All the answers above are correct, but the smart way to victory is to eliminate the Player. Thus, position yourself in whichever way you can stab/shoot the player, that is good enough
/s
However, keep in mind that White may be able to counter your Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine via the use of the Project 971 Akula-class nuclear-powered fast attack submarine. In the case of such a threat, use your own 688-class Los Angeles fast attack submarine to counter and neutralize the threat to your undersea based power projection
Careful! My opponent's queen's knight annihilated me with an RAF Nimrod 2X4 sonobouy deployment pattern followed by active homing torps. Last time I trust a Tango to do an Alpha's job...
@@mikhailiagacesa3406 use tank
@@cyrusds KV-1? I am stupid; of course a Russian heavy tank. (Slaps forehead)
@@mikhailiagacesa3406 lol
@@mikhailiagacesa3406 no no no if you use the is-7 you can counter then attack yourself sir please be careful next gime
Let's be a serious for just a while, jokes and sarcasm aside. We should make a board game like this, wherein there are aircrafts, missiles, interceptors, submarines, nukes, anti-submarines, etc. That would be super interesting.
This video helped me a lot. I didn't know that all I need is just a submarine. Why didn't I think of that. I think aircraft carrier would be better because it's planes will protect me against those migs that kept killing my units in chess.
If I ever find any motivation I'm totally coding political chess.
The trick to making that is to find realistic and logical ways to tie the chess moves to the cold War tactics.
Also, the submarine is preferable in this case because it's stealthy and requires less manpower and materiel. An aircraft carrier can't be effectively used without further developing your board.
ICBM on steam is kinda like what you're describing, minus the chess.
There's a game called Risk.
Aircraft carriers are effective in the early game, but towards the end you'll need stealth capabilities. My favorite moves are to launch a torpedo from a German U-Boat, or simply yeet a B2 stealth bomber into the board
dude there is something about mr. Vikram Rahul Abhishek Pranav Rajesh's voice... I could hear him talking about chess till the end of time
Everybody gangsta until Vikram says 'The next move is obvious'
I love how his videos just kept evolving, now he even has reflections / RTX on
"For example: Launching an RS-28 Sonic Liquid Propellant Multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicularly-equipped superheavy intercontinental ballistic missile... would not be possible due to the position of our knight."
aww i wanted to nuke em
knight's gotta hide in a fridge.
*Sarmat, not Sonic
Rules is rules. If chess didn't have rules it would be checkers.
Wow, thank you so much. One time when I accepted this gambit, I lost the game because a Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-31 came in and destroyed my paws with the Kh-47! Now I'm aware of the dangers.
MiG stands for Mikoyan-Gurevich. So you're basically said MiG MiG-31. It's like saying Sahara desert
the way the voice is so straight is the reason im currently on the ground breathing while making the sound "Aahaha" and my eyes are dripping of a mixture of salt, fatty oil and water.
1:06 is exactly what happens when you blunder a rated chess match.
Another quality chess video by Bosnian Ape Society. Truly he has mastered every aspect of chess with his flawless strategy and immaculate military arsenal.
correction: the 'military arsenal' is only another aspect of the board.
"Its even funnier the second time!"
-King neptune
I did not expect the sub to bust through the ice, rather I anticipated a trident missile to win the game. Well played BAS.
Summed up the Cold War in one video. And made me laugh my ass off. Beautiful
Holy fucking shit, when he gave a few seconds to find the best move I actually thought of nuclear attack from submarines as the solution.
"We know that chess is a political landmine of illegal moves."
yes
Yes
Yes
Yes.
Yes
Holy fuck, this one is just perfect. These jokes havent get old yet
Really unfortunate how the algorithm stopped recommending your videos to everyone. They missed a lot of things
I've been waiting for a video like this for a long time, I've grown tired of the constant losses I've suffered due to this, and this video helps a ton.
So this is the 5D chess i’ve been hearing about. You have to worry about your pieces, your economy, politics, and your ballistic missile arsenal all at the same time.
This has been the channel I go to everytime. Hope you keep doing this.
The only problem is if the enemy decides to set landmines on targets like D5 or G1. This could be a major deterrence as chess rules state that moving a piece on a landline tile results in immediate loss of that piece. How would you counter that?
Sanctions placed on the mine-placing player, likely causing enough economic repercussions that the reduction in pawns placed would result in a net positive balance of material on the board. Defence coalitions and trading blocs are a must in today's tournaments.
Most tournaments have restrictions on what explosives can be placed on what parts of the board, in an attempt to keep the play vanilla as to avoid locking off control of essential areas of the board
And the loss of fingers?
oh come on, my nuclear powered Ohio class submarine isn't affected by a landmine.
chess with landmines actually sounds dope
This is an excellent move towards winning the game, but one fatal flaw is that White can counter with a Supersonic T14 S4-D3 Ballistic Missile, which would prevent black moving twice in one turn. A better move is to counter with a A415 T8 Bomber Jet, which will deflect the incoming missile with enough force to allow black to deliver checkmate.
those are not actual weapons.
@@MauryaSenapati yeah ur correct
Yep
I will now know how to protect my Queen from a Soviet Mikoyan Gurevich 31 mach 3 intercepter carrying nuclear warheads, thank you sir.
Actual info to beat someone in chess
it's perfect when you play chess and then when you win you just launch a nuclear missile at the board
The people who disliked are now having a fleet of nuclear-capable interceptor aircraft coming to level them into the ground
Correction: The people who disliked relied too heavily on the nuclear-capable interceptor aircraft and don't like that the grand master has developed a perfect counter to their antics.
“When in doubt, C4”
- Jamie Hyneman
Anya Taylor-Joy will be employing this move in the next season of *The Queen's Gambit.*
Lmfao okay
I love how the videos always start with some super plausible and impressive chess strategies.
I love the way you deliver the full strategy up to the last movement and then just turn back to Monke for giggles
As a Nuclear Chess Grandmaster myself, I must say I'm impressed with this tutorial.
Wow, I’ve never seen this strategy before. Typically after accepting the sacrificial pawn, I activate my M163 Vulcan Air Defense System to shoot down any incoming nuclear-capable interceptor aircraft so that the nuclear warhead’s trajectory is altered to the enemy king’s position, effectively winning the game.
A solid alternative. Personally, I prefer the Dutch Goalkeeper Close In Weapons System mounted on a Karel Doorman-class frigate for anti-air defense during my chess games.
Honestly , this is one of the best Chess tutorials I have seen in UA-cam
This channel understands my humor across the board. Every single video, just top tier.
Thank you for making this tutorials, they have been helpful for me so many times, my favorite was the shopping trolley I use it every time I go shopping now
Thank you Grand Master Vikram Rahul Abhishek Pranav Rajesh for this detailed explanation of this particular gambit. Your knowledge of the deepest intricacies of chess is truly unparalleled.
Really appreciate the time, effort, humor, and quality put into these animations. Thank u ❤️
I honestly didn't see the final move coming, beautiful checkmate.
"thank you skillshare" famous last words before the damage inflicted by a ballistic missile
As someone who legit plays the albin counter gambit I can confirm this is very accurate.
"Just a completely normal game of chess played with completely normal pieces under completely normal circumstances"
Japan learned this trick the hard way in the year of 1945.
Wasn't that ICBM variation?
I am learning so much about the deeper intricacies of chess from these tutorials. Thank You.
We really need to make a video on how to protect your recliner from nuclear warfare
thanks op, these tutorials are so incredibly relevant today
Damnit all, I thought the proper move at 4:28 was to deploy a Deutschland-class pocket battleship with 12"/50 caliber guns to attack White's pieces. It would be so non-meta, but thankfully I have this great tutorial to show me the error of my ways.
TL;DW: don’t accept capitalism in chess or else a nuclear armed anti-ship armed mig-31 will defeat your every move in chess
This is for those that for some reason don’t have 8 minutes
And this is how you play hearts of iron IV
@@TycoonTitian01 Can we get manpower out of this
@@u.m.rcentral868 idk maybe
I expected the UGM-133A Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missile to strike the board, but instead the Ohio-class nuclear-powered submarine rose from the ground. My expectations have been subverted.
How tf was this one of the best chess tutorials I have watched