WHY YOU SHOULD NOT TRUST THIS TESTER THATS ALL OVER THE INTERNET.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 252

  • @BladeLabMiami
    @BladeLabMiami Рік тому +60

    This is 100% true, and I'll add that another way to cheat the test is to pull the filament extremely tight. It should be pulled just tight enough to take out any slack. Or of course you can use the pre-strung blanks, but those will read about 20% lower than the reel-type holder. I still find the BESS tester to be an invaluable tool for improving and checking on MY sharpening, which is the reason to have one (not to show off).

    • @BladeLabMiami
      @BladeLabMiami Рік тому

      @@JREwing-se2wk The instructions say essentially what I said above: "The goal here is to
      simply pull the test media across the gap in the fixture with no slack (slight tension) in the test media. Do
      not over tension the test media." Tension doesn't have the same impact as speed, so it's not super critical. The difference between correct tension and overtightening is only about 15g. If you do the test the right way the results are very repeatable. I have the PT50B machine which reads to the nearest 5g, and I'd say that's about what the margin of error is for this system. That's why I chose the somewhat cheaper PT50B over the PT50A which reads to the nearest 1g.

    • @littlejackalo5326
      @littlejackalo5326 Рік тому +2

      You buy pre set filaments. They're stretched across a plastic tab, like one of those tooth flossers. It's not as variable as he's making it out to be.

    • @BladeLabMiami
      @BladeLabMiami Рік тому

      @@littlejackalo5326 I agree that the test clips would be best for comparing results on UA-cam. But this is what Edge on Up says about them: "While test clips utilize the same test media that is found in our TM02 test media canisters, DTC100 test clips are not BESS CERTIFIED and are useful for highly repeatible relative edge measurements only. Test clip measurements yield approximately 80% of the force required when using our BESS CERTIFIED ATF10G fixture."

    • @joshuarosenblatt
      @joshuarosenblatt Рік тому +2

      You can buy the protest strips if you want consistency
      Or. You can get a magnetic clip and use a specific weight (ie: 100 grams) to pull the wire taught each time so you can at least create your own consistency as best as possible

    • @viper04af
      @viper04af 6 місяців тому +1

      @@joshuarosenblatt the clip are also faster when sharpening too before changing grit to check for burr

  • @robertdewalt8711
    @robertdewalt8711 Рік тому +12

    I use weights to ensure BESS C media is always at same tension. I also go slow as per instructions. I have seen too many fake ones done on UA-cam where I can tell they are going too fast. I am glad you demonstrated how results can be manipulated.

  • @blondie5910
    @blondie5910 Рік тому +24

    SPEAK THE TRUTH

  • @EverydayCityCarry
    @EverydayCityCarry Рік тому +3

    This video was constructed very well. Really informative with good pacing.

  • @laurent6974
    @laurent6974 Рік тому +2

    Thanks a lot Jerad. We talked about it during a live and I was waiting for this video and explanations 👍

  • @toddcarr.
    @toddcarr. Рік тому +11

    Great vid Jerad, bringing light to an issue that's becoming more prevalent with these Bess Testers. Would be great to see a mechanical arm that clamps onto the knife and would apply constant pressure until the wire breaks, take the human part out of the equation all together. Thanks for the great vid and keep making sharp things fun and enjoyable

    • @BrandonGavin_EDC
      @BrandonGavin_EDC Рік тому +1

      That’s about the only way to get a real and consistent result.

    • @jimbarbwe1985
      @jimbarbwe1985 Рік тому +2

      yo Todd

    • @dcuttingedge5422
      @dcuttingedge5422 Рік тому +3

      I think one of the BESS tester prototypes used a mechanical rig like you describe. It used gram weights for pressure.

  • @Tatterdsoul
    @Tatterdsoul Рік тому +1

    This is Neeves at his best. Representing. Excellent vid. Cheers

  • @mikereese15
    @mikereese15 Рік тому

    Always appreciate your honesty Jerad. Thats why we watch and trust you.

  • @robertkain7890
    @robertkain7890 Рік тому +3

    Glad you brought this subject back to the foreground! Haven't seen anyone discuss this since Frankie and Bird were presenting their new tester and showing off the edge that Bird put onto a knife with his KME sharpener. He was getting wicked readings in the low double digits.... and they were using the tester properly!

  • @mwm302
    @mwm302 Рік тому +1

    Thank you so much Jerad. Calling out this kind of crap is what we need

  • @lmcq784
    @lmcq784 Рік тому +4

    Thanks for showing us the limitations of the tool. I would say, though, that the tool doesn’t lie… instructions are to be followed and the tool should be respected. There’s nothing inherently wrong with the tool… people just aren’t honest with how they use it. It’s like how I teach student about statistics. Statistics don’t lie - people do. People can frame true statistics in such a way that give a very biased picture. Just like with this tool.

  • @dcuttingedge5422
    @dcuttingedge5422 Рік тому +1

    Great video man!! I've seen those crazy low BESS scores and have really wondered what was going on. I own a BESS tester and always do three cut averages when I'm serious about it. IMO you have to question your own results when doing any kind of testing. It's very easy to fool yourself when you're motivated by the feedback.

  • @alpharibo
    @alpharibo Рік тому +1

    Thank you for this, I’ve been seeing some ads recently for a certain sharpening system and it’s clear they’re cheating it on which bothered me a lot

  • @uzumlubay
    @uzumlubay Рік тому +2

    If you tension the wire by 100g which is the manufacturers guidelines then even your 3 measures to get an average would probably be closer.

  • @Mr_Obvious
    @Mr_Obvious Рік тому +3

    Thank you for showing us this! I hope you don't get to much flack for it. It was really informative, and it's good to keep it honest!

  • @danpennella
    @danpennella Рік тому +7

    I appreciate the honesty! Keeping it real is why everyone loves you and definitely never hold back.

  • @DinoNucci
    @DinoNucci Рік тому +1

    CAPS LOCK is a button on a computer keyboard that causes all letters of Latin and Cyrillic based scripts to be generated in capital letters. It is a toggle key: each press reverses the previous action.

    • @NeevesKnives
      @NeevesKnives  Рік тому +1

      You don't Miss Dino and I appreciate that 👊

    • @DinoNucci
      @DinoNucci Рік тому +1

      ​@@NeevesKnivesPizzA

  • @Hung-Tan-Tran
    @Hung-Tan-Tran 6 місяців тому

    Thanks for speaking out on this! I have seen a fair amount of 🧢 from sharpening influencers using this device misleadingly

  • @danzigrulze5211
    @danzigrulze5211 Рік тому +2

    My tester is the top of my left hand. The area always has a clean shaven look.

  • @DerekRC
    @DerekRC Рік тому

    Totally agree with you bro. Slow and consistent is the only way to get consistent results.

  • @therealwulf
    @therealwulf 6 місяців тому +8

    It feels disingenuous for you to title this why this tester shouldn't be trusted, when the tester in fact does work as advertised when it's used within recommended parameters. It's the people using it wrong that causes the results to be skewed. Use anything wrong and your results won't come out correct.

  • @Mo.89.
    @Mo.89. Рік тому +2

    That Tumbler rolling sharpener company are the best example of this

  • @rd314536
    @rd314536 Рік тому +1

    I’ve been sharpening for my job since the 90’s and have had the PT50A model for 6-7 years now. I would love to see everyone start calling out these people en masse as the disinformation is not only obnoxious but likely discourages others starting out when they try to copy what they see with underwealming results. I’ve seen so many fail to use the tester properly and have a hard time believing it’s ever from a lack of knowledge on using the tester correctly as even the owner has an instructional video here. I believe people are doing it for some false ego boost or more nefariously to dupe viewers that don’t know better to overhype sharpening products they are selling/affiliated with. IDK why so people feel qualified to teach others skills they’re still just learning themselves, but UA-cam is flooded with self proclaimed “experts” who never have sharpening stones with any wear to them. The BESS Tester is great for confirming an edge is not passing other tests (ie push cut accross grain of thin rolling papers or HHT) from simply a weak but polished burr as it will just mushroom on the test media.

  • @SnowyMountainQuantum
    @SnowyMountainQuantum Рік тому

    Short, clear, and informative. Amazing

  • @robsinquefield9260
    @robsinquefield9260 Рік тому

    I never had confidence in this system and now I see why! not consistent at all and can obviously be manipulated!

  • @hansamlah2756
    @hansamlah2756 Рік тому

    This is the test that the tumbler diamond rolling knife sharpener has been using for their ads. I knew it was too good to be true. Thanks for making this video. 😁👍

  • @thiago.assumpcao
    @thiago.assumpcao Рік тому +3

    Excellent video man. Honest approach. I had no idea it could be manipulated so much by speed.
    It also has issues when comparing cutting capacity of polished edge vs aggressive edge. A polished edge sometimes will stop cutting rope at 300 BESS while an aggressive edge sometimes keep cutting up to 500. I think that makes sense even without any manipulation. BESS will measure keenness but, since there is no slicing motion, it doesn't take in account how serrated the edge is.

    • @neiljudell1437
      @neiljudell1437 Рік тому

      It would be fascinating to see results on something like dendritic cobalt. That stuff cuts like crazy, but is probably not going to test well on the BESS

    • @thiago.assumpcao
      @thiago.assumpcao Рік тому

      @@neiljudell1437 I've heard of some exotic materials like tungsten carbide and elastic ceramic but dendritic cobalt is news to me.

    • @loboptlu
      @loboptlu Рік тому

      @@thiago.assumpcaothe italian knifemaker Sandrin makes wolfram carbide knives

  • @andrewmypocalypse
    @andrewmypocalypse Рік тому

    Thanks for this eye opening review. I see many reviewers just barrel through the wire. I’m sure most aren’t trying to get one over on me, so I hope this makes its way to all. ❤❤

  • @malcolmholt2010
    @malcolmholt2010 Рік тому +2

    Another great video, I have one that I use and can regularly get an edge in 130-180 if working with good steels that have been heat treated properly. I just thought I must not be very good at it after watching some videos. Thx for pointing out that cheating is possible. Should have known

  • @craigm2484
    @craigm2484 Рік тому +1

    I am Impressed how that blade went through that paper towel ! 👊🏼

  • @BrandonGavin_EDC
    @BrandonGavin_EDC Рік тому +1

    As Todd Carr said below. The only way to get this consistent would be to use a machine with consistent pressure to get accurate measurement.

  • @ibsnipingyou
    @ibsnipingyou Рік тому +6

    I’m glad you did this, bc I didn’t trust the test universally either.

  • @bobartig
    @bobartig Рік тому +1

    I never realized it was a *wire* being cut. For some reason, I thought it was a little clear plastic card being cut into. Since it's a wire, is BESS basically testing micro bevel acuity, independent of overall edge geometry?

  • @JoeSteel1
    @JoeSteel1 Рік тому

    Yes I discovered that with this tester fairly early using it...absolutely right dude, great video

  • @israelchildress4523
    @israelchildress4523 Рік тому

    Always keeping it 💯 Jerad! Great stuff!

  • @Gman1024
    @Gman1024 Рік тому +3

    If you use it properly, then why should you not trust it?
    The video should probably be called "Why you should not trust the Testers on the internet using this tester".
    The title disparages a tool that a lot of people use successfully and consistently with proven results.
    This is my first experience with clickbait on your channel.

  • @Outside-In.
    @Outside-In. Рік тому +1

    The title is wrong... They all work the same way. You have to use this tool the correct way, just like with any other tool. I made my own that works great, but still it will read false if I cut the wire too fast. You make it sound as though this scale is a waste of money, it is not. I made my own because I can't afford this one, but again - they ALL work the same, you just have to use it correctly - that is what your title should have stated...

    • @nateubl7235
      @nateubl7235 11 місяців тому +1

      Completely agree! Very similar any other way a person might “test” the capabilities of the knife; a tool can be used correctly or incorrectly changing the type of any results seen.

    • @Outside-In.
      @Outside-In. 11 місяців тому

      @@nateubl7235 Exactly... If you bring your knife down too fast, it will say the knife is way sharper than it really is (and some use that technique to falsify how sharp their knives they are selling are unfortunately), but if you bring the blade down slowly (like your supposed to do), you get a much much better accuracy on sharpness. It would be great if they could come up with an adapter that would only let the blade lower at a specific speed, making it even more accurate no matter what type of knife being used. Just a thought. 👍

  • @Severe_Deceit
    @Severe_Deceit Рік тому

    Great video. Thanks for sharing and making the community a better place.

  • @samthehikingman9484
    @samthehikingman9484 2 місяці тому

    This was very enlightening, thankyou very much,Ive learnt something new to me..
    Best regards : -)

  • @leonardosestari5951
    @leonardosestari5951 Рік тому +1

    I don't like that test very much because it can't differentiate between a polished and toothy edge. So even with a sharp knife you might not have a very good cutting performance

  • @michaell397
    @michaell397 Рік тому

    I couldn't possibly agree more. Further, the Bess test is only good for testing a blades push cutting ability. It completely ignores such things as micro teeth for instance where high vanadium carbide steels really shine. I can sharpen a blade so sharp and highly polished on the edge that it will score very low, shave like a dream but will not cut hot butter! I use to mirror polish edges to a fantastic shaving edge just for knife shows. Why? Because everybody seems to want to pick up a knife and see if it shaves. The next thing they do is bleed all over my table. So I give them smooth, shaving, dull knives! How can a shaving edge be dull. simple, No micro teeth to actually cut in anything but a push cut. Which in every day use is virtually useless except for preparing veggies in the kitchen. Issue is, without the micro teeth, when doing a working cut, the edge tends to simply slide on the material being cut. No Bite!
    KnifeMaker/Retired after over 47+ Years in the Craft and in association with the Original R.W. (Bob) Loveless/Jim Merritt Shop

  • @stevewarfel5788
    @stevewarfel5788 Місяць тому

    I got the one with the prewired clips. I used 5 clips and on one of them, the wire popped out of the clip. This was a knife that scored 100, or two sided razor sharp, so, it didn't push the wire from the holding clip. Not happy with purchase at all.

  • @olbubs
    @olbubs Рік тому

    So true man!!! I’ve called out instagram ads for doing the test quickly and without averaging.
    Also I think the clips are much more consistent than the canister of filament, but they are spensive!
    Also your 39 is insane! 70’s is my best!

    • @David_DY
      @David_DY Рік тому +1

      Lol...The 39 was cheating!! 148 was the real number!! 👊🏼

    • @olbubs
      @olbubs Рік тому

      @@David_DY I thought he had a legit one in the 30’s at the beginning of the video, but I rewatched and you are most definitely correct! My mistake!

  • @michaelsawyer519
    @michaelsawyer519 Рік тому

    Great video keeping them Honest 😅 👍 love seeing some of these "different/unique" videos that aren't the average run of the mill knife vids

  • @Bear-nu8xm
    @Bear-nu8xm Рік тому

    Good info Jared! I new one of these. I just see if I can cut paper towels cleanly to test my edges .

  • @ryansmock2717
    @ryansmock2717 Рік тому +1

    The punching the air part had me ROLLING LOL

  • @unfi6798
    @unfi6798 Рік тому

    We're with you mate.!

  • @danielbottner7700
    @danielbottner7700 4 місяці тому

    How consistent is the test Bess certified test media ?
    - I am testing high quality monofilament fishing line with =/- 5% deviation.
    - 100 tests with new out of the wrapper scalpel blade
    - Using a mechanical 10 to 1 speed reduction lever to minimize feed speed & variations in feed speed.
    - The mono filament line I am testing seems to be 50% stronger =/- 5% deviation.

    • @NeevesKnives
      @NeevesKnives  4 місяці тому

      I'm not sure I have not specifically tested that in a controlled manner

  • @timblackburne77
    @timblackburne77 Рік тому

    I have only seen one guy on youtube using it to test factory sharpness of knives and he uses it honestly. It is only a guide after all, there are heaps of ways to see how sharp a knife is. A number is just a number.

  • @silverslvr5185
    @silverslvr5185 Рік тому

    I still am thinking of ordering one of these testers. Just to see if my sharpening skills are up to par. Prior my only concern was the leverage of the handle and the difference edges would effect the numbers, like recurve to a belly..

  • @profesorEDC
    @profesorEDC Рік тому

    Brilliant Jerad 👌 I know of a big lier down here in Mexico that manipulates results. Thanks bud🤜🤛

  • @didgemonkey
    @didgemonkey 8 місяців тому

    I always wondered what difference the speed of cut made... thanks for clarifying for me...

  • @tacticalcenter8658
    @tacticalcenter8658 Рік тому

    It can also be a low number where its being tested and a higher number elsewhere on the length of the blade.

  • @jackdonoughe4892
    @jackdonoughe4892 Рік тому

    Direct attack on the steel tumble roller thing. I love it

  • @marioceres4022
    @marioceres4022 Рік тому

    Great explanation! Thanks for the video

  • @edkorsberg6441
    @edkorsberg6441 Рік тому

    Thank you for this Public Service Announcement. My initial interpretation from the headline was that we should not consider purchasing this tool. I agree that accurate results are a challenge and that maybe people on the internet cheat. However I think this tool may still be useful as a gauge on my workshop. I would need to learn how to use it accurately and consistently so that I could use it as a metric of how well I sharpen. But I also agree it may be of little value to try and compare numerical values between other people or even between different knife styles.

  • @markanderson8677
    @markanderson8677 Рік тому

    Thanks for highlighting this issue. For me, the paper test is good enough as I use my knives every day.

  • @CarlSanford76
    @CarlSanford76 Рік тому

    this is exactly why this is my favorite knife channel. The bullshit does not stand, nor is tollerated here. Well done, well done indeed.

  • @Leo99929
    @Leo99929 5 місяців тому

    They need to modify the scale so that it automatically applies a progressive load at a constant rate. I bet this could be rigged up for not too much? Use a load cell and RTC to record the g/s loading rate?

  • @meeeeee423
    @meeeeee423 Рік тому

    Good video. Glad it was short and no BS

  • @knaftasticedc956
    @knaftasticedc956 Рік тому

    Awesome...truth...thanks for explaining this mythical tester...

  • @Keith_the_knife_freak
    @Keith_the_knife_freak Рік тому

    My dollica scored a 17 on the machine.. are you telling me that's fake ??

  • @peterflannigan6672
    @peterflannigan6672 Рік тому +2

    You should put up a short of this

  • @lpknifeworks
    @lpknifeworks Рік тому

    BASED, never crossed my mind. You would need to do a more controlled test where you knew the same amount of pressure was being applied every time and THEN average it as well. Wow, that's a "results may vary" if I've ever seen one!

    • @elevationmoto6208
      @elevationmoto6208 Рік тому +1

      How about testing multiple points on the blade? Seems to me that using the entire length of the blade to cut paper would reveal variations. But how can you put a number on that? I really don't care, because I like to see people showing off by cutting paper, cutting slices off blueberries, and doing other real things that I can try to duplicate. Great video!

  • @legendaryschander78
    @legendaryschander78 Рік тому +1

    Jerad is damn right about this! I for my part use cigarette tubes, for shits and giggles did I use this BESS thing once (a guy does the testing for 5€ each)
    I dont trust this number thats why I wont say it and I dont wanna sound like a flexer or anything, another thing is that I dont have proof for that (no video sorry....) I did it once and he offered me to do a few more on house because he couldn't believe it all in all I did 4 testings for 5€.
    But if you wanna check something Knife Grinders has a modified chart which shows that you can reliable whittle hair at the 100 range? (Im not certain at this moment) but they show what you can and cant do with the edge you have on your knife.
    Another thing is I found out the tester favors Mirror Polished 4k+ edges because essentially you do a pushcut and Coarse up to 3000k score way higher on the tester, which is a little inconsistency I discovered....

  • @kerrykitterman4602
    @kerrykitterman4602 Рік тому

    Good Information, Thanks Jared .😮

  • @jeffp7368
    @jeffp7368 Рік тому

    Great video. Thank you for doing this.

  • @Pzykoh_Tey
    @Pzykoh_Tey Рік тому

    Fantastic vid Jared. Thanks

  • @myfavoriteviewer306
    @myfavoriteviewer306 Рік тому

    Very nice! I've seen a lot of misuse of these Bess tests, and it's irritating every time.

  • @helddermolekule5503
    @helddermolekule5503 10 місяців тому

    It should not be toooo difficult to develop a system that overcomes those problems. I wonder why there is none...

  • @webderek
    @webderek Рік тому

    Thank you. Good to know. I think it should be easy to see if someone is doing it right or not.

  • @bladetasticknives5712
    @bladetasticknives5712 Рік тому

    Thanks 🙏🏼 brother, keeping them honest 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @NAFcollector
    @NAFcollector Рік тому

    Very informative video, thanks for sharing

  • @TheWeirdedBeardo
    @TheWeirdedBeardo Рік тому

    Dude, I love my mordax. It was cool to see you using one🇺🇲🙃

  • @MasterDu0666
    @MasterDu0666 2 місяці тому

    Oh damn thx for the info man

  • @CrazySharp
    @CrazySharp Рік тому

    I have had a lot of questions about this… BTW first!!!

  • @JerryLoffelbein
    @JerryLoffelbein Рік тому

    Yep, anything with a human element isn't going to be the most accurate thing around, especially when comparing between different humans.
    I'll use the thing for videos when I'm checking a blade's edge right out of the box. I do it in real time on camera and also depict my stringing of the filament so people can draw their own conclusions... but that does require their knowledge on HOW to properly utilize the tool to judge if someone's using it correctly or not.
    As you say, more often than not, people don't RTFM and maybe follow the techniques from other content creators that get those unrealistically low numbers. I'm immediately skeptical of any readings someone gets if things score less than 100. Usually you can see this if they show it on camera though, as the blade will have inertia and continue moving after the filament is severed.
    For the most part, I use it from time to time as a sanity check on my own sharpening. If I change something up in my technique/materials, or use a different system or stropping compound, etc I can see if it's effective, has diminishing returns or was regressive.

  • @censusgary
    @censusgary Рік тому

    I think the most objective way to gage a blade’s edge is to examine that under a microscope. That’s academically quite interesting, but you don’t really need to do that, if what you want is a blade that cuts. Just sharpen that thing until it cuts the way you want it to.

  • @MosesKaldor
    @MosesKaldor 5 місяців тому

    We all know a certain drop shipper who used to slam down on the tester. They’ve been called out and seem to use it as intended.

  • @Thingstodointenn
    @Thingstodointenn День тому

    So what you are saying when used properly you get good results but when used improperly you will not.

  • @Owens_Racing
    @Owens_Racing Рік тому

    Excellent education. As for this device. Create a pivot with arm and weight to put the pressure on. Could be done 3D printing. As well gives a repeatable force.

  • @peterwiltshire6254
    @peterwiltshire6254 Рік тому

    Well done. Any chance you could do a test between some double edge blades versus a straight razor. I just started wet shaving and getting a straight razor shave ready forced me to buy 3 higher grit stones. It's a new level of sharpening and a good stroping is essential. Thanks.

    • @NeevesKnives
      @NeevesKnives  Рік тому

      I WILL SEE WHAT I CAN PUT TOGETHER IF YOUR A MEMBER ON THE CHANNEL WE DO LIVE SHARPENINGS TWICE A MONTH

  • @ashsmall8103
    @ashsmall8103 Рік тому

    what grits would u recommend for venev dual sided stones if i were to get 2 stones allowing for 4 grits

    • @NeevesKnives
      @NeevesKnives  Рік тому +1

      Something very coarse like a 180 /125 or similar with another coarse on the other side i forget which one i think its 100/80, then the 50/40 with the 20/14 on the other side

  • @gregmccormack5709
    @gregmccormack5709 Рік тому

    Neeves keeping it real 👍🏻

  • @johnathanelliott5143
    @johnathanelliott5143 Рік тому

    What's the sharpening stone that you were using?

    • @NeevesKnives
      @NeevesKnives  Рік тому +1

      Probably Atoma, and Venev checkout the neevesknives store link in most recent videos or HAPSTONE link

  • @AlaskanFrontier1
    @AlaskanFrontier1 Рік тому

    Thanks for information

  • @FAFO217
    @FAFO217 Рік тому

    This is literally something I've been telling everyone i know that sharpens. Anytime you use the spool it's very easy to cheat the score to make your ego feel better. I prefer the clips because those tensiona are set by factory

  • @user-pm7pw1tl3t
    @user-pm7pw1tl3t Рік тому

    On the internet if someone tells you the sky is blue you better do your own research because 99% of the time what people say and do is wrong or falsely informed

  • @MichaelE.Douroux
    @MichaelE.Douroux Рік тому

    Oh, boy, this is going to cause a stir, but you backed up what you said.

  • @P1015532oni
    @P1015532oni Рік тому

    The only sharpness test I ever do is phonebook paper, against the grain. Sure, not super-dupper sharp. But that is my minimum standard. If it can cut phonebook paper, it can cut anything I usually cut, with ease. And it’s not TOO sharp where you’d lose the edge too quickly. And it’s fairly easy to maintain this said standard, freehand, with few strokes of a diamond rod, butcher’s steel, and a leather strop.

  • @heyarno
    @heyarno 2 місяці тому

    Another channel that uses one of those says that by putting extreme pre-tension on the wire, you can cheat too.
    It's why they use the single use inserts.

    • @NeevesKnives
      @NeevesKnives  2 місяці тому

      I have used both they are both super easy to cheat

  • @oilcanjavi
    @oilcanjavi 25 днів тому

    It’s also not cutting, it’s breaking the wire. If anything it’s testing average tensile strength

  • @edwardk6764
    @edwardk6764 Рік тому

    Point taken. Thanks Jerad.

  • @garlandholland
    @garlandholland Рік тому

    Thanks for the content I wondered if it was a trick to it.

  • @jdisdetermined
    @jdisdetermined Рік тому

    J swinging hard at the air was funnier than I was prepared for.. I think a couple of them connected.

  • @JohnC29
    @JohnC29 Рік тому +1

    I find mine useful when I use it correctly.

  • @sinepari9160
    @sinepari9160 4 місяці тому

    I don't use the device to see how *low* of a score I can get. I used it to gauge my sharpening process. It is quite fun, though, to see exactly how razor-sharp you can get something. I typically use it in a casual way and keep all of my knives in the 200-ish range, which is plenty sharp for whatever I do with a knife. The sharper the knife is, the quicker you will lose that 100-200 razor edge.

    • @NeevesKnives
      @NeevesKnives  4 місяці тому

      It's actually the opposite way, the sharper it is the more edge retention it has. What you lose is toughness so there's a balance so that your edge is not to brittle but sharper leads to longer cutting edge retention. Now certain steels will lose the bite much faster with a very fine grit which can come off as getting less sharp. I watch the majority of people who use this test cheat this test most people do not know what to look for or how it actually works which is why I made this video after watching dozens of people cheat the test

    • @sinepari9160
      @sinepari9160 4 місяці тому

      @@NeevesKnives I learn something every day!

  • @msharmall7298
    @msharmall7298 Рік тому

    I’ve seen SO many people use this tester and straight up lie about how sharp knives are. Maybe they don’t realize, but it’s ridiculously off. So many Benchmade’s testing like they come with Hogue edges when we all know there is zero way that’s accurate.

  • @roberttaylor6030
    @roberttaylor6030 Рік тому

    I've seen it manipulated and seen people in the comments calling them out on it.

  • @mattakudesu
    @mattakudesu Рік тому

    I always took any results from this tester with a grain of salt because it relies so much on the person doing the testing doing it the right way