Don't look at this kind of comparison. You have to adjust samples first. Default samples rate in octane is 16.000 which you never use actually. Already 1000-2000 samples is actually enough in most cases. The power of octane is that actually by 50 samples you have a nice overwiev of what is going on in the scene, so you can render fast preview in seconds.
You can do exactly the same thing in Redshift, rather than Bucket Render, you can set progressive render and choose like 16 samples and see what is going on easily
To be more fairly, maybe next time you could show us the details of the Render Settings of both engines, and try to make the results a little bit noisy, not that perfectly clear, but on the same noise level.and then make the comparation.(maybe turn off the De-Noise function for each enging). because according to the scene sets shown in the video, I dont understand why each scene took that long time to render, they seem so simple, and you have rtx 3090...X4... so if the sample numbers were way too high in every scene, the render time was meaningless for production, so as the compare result.
This render test is a joke, why the render took so long for each one? clearly you don´t know how to use both render engine, you just installed the plugin and press render. I'm a experience user for both engine, and Octane is so much faster than Redshift for scenes so simple like this, Redshift could beat Octane only for SSS material. This test is no more than 10 minutes average.
I feel this 1000%. Like Beeple, I do everydays too and it's made me so much better (slowly tho' lol)... I've been on the Octane train for quite some time and feel like it's time to step it up and learn, master Redshift. Which render engine do you like more? Just curious.
As someone who started in the industry as a gaffer, it makes more sense to me using octane (unbiased) than redshift since the ability to have lights just work how they do in the real world makes things so much faster and I understand it like the back of my hand.
Hi Will Bachman, Thank you for sharing your perspective. By the way, iRender is a professional cloud rendering for Octane and Redshift for all host applications. We provide powerful RTX 4090 / RTX 3090 servers to speed up your renders many times. You can try us at irendering.net. Have a nice day!
If you're lazy get Octane, if you are a perfectionist use Redshift. Octane looks more exact because it gets unbiased lighting. Redshift lets you define the lighting. If you are getting better results in Octane it could be due to lack of knowledge in Redshift. Redshift is harder to learn. Octane gets me better results in macro "beeple style scenes" Redshift gets me better results on micro, camera focused tabletop scenes. Then again I am biased, the engines are not, sometimes: ahhh word pun hehehe...
I like the way your brain works lol... im at a weird crossroads because I'm "aeight" w/ Octane because like Beeple I do everydays as well, but my wife is really killing it w/ Redshift in her own commercial works and the rest of the world... so i kinda feel the insane peer pressure to just go ahead, learn and master Redshift.
Seems to me like the render settings have been left untouched. As #Octane settings are way to high (16.000 samples) by default, but realistically you only use about 1000 samples depending on the scene ... so 16x less samples ;)
Hi pixelasm, Thank you for your comment. iRender is a powerful cloud rendering service for Redshift and Octane. We provide powerful RTX 4090 / 3090 servers to speed up your renders many times. You can try us at irendering.net. Have a nice day!
Probably Maxon paid for this video.
Don't look at this kind of comparison. You have to adjust samples first. Default samples rate in octane is 16.000 which you never use actually. Already 1000-2000 samples is actually enough in most cases. The power of octane is that actually by 50 samples you have a nice overwiev of what is going on in the scene, so you can render fast preview in seconds.
You can do exactly the same thing in Redshift, rather than Bucket Render, you can set progressive render and choose like 16 samples and see what is going on easily
To be more fairly, maybe next time you could show us the details of the Render Settings of both engines, and try to make the results a little bit noisy, not that perfectly clear, but on the same noise level.and then make the comparation.(maybe turn off the De-Noise function for each enging).
because according to the scene sets shown in the video, I dont understand why each scene took that long time to render, they seem so simple, and you have rtx 3090...X4... so if the sample numbers were way too high in every scene, the render time was meaningless for production, so as the compare result.
i call BS - Clearly non optimized at all.
This render test is a joke, why the render took so long for each one? clearly you don´t know how to use both render engine, you just installed the plugin and press render. I'm a experience user for both engine, and Octane is so much faster than Redshift for scenes so simple like this, Redshift could beat Octane only for SSS material.
This test is no more than 10 minutes average.
I feel this 1000%. Like Beeple, I do everydays too and it's made me so much better (slowly tho' lol)... I've been on the Octane train for quite some time and feel like it's time to step it up and learn, master Redshift. Which render engine do you like more? Just curious.
this comparison is a joke.. octane is really fast but cant handle volumetrics that good
As someone who started in the industry as a gaffer, it makes more sense to me using octane (unbiased) than redshift since the ability to have lights just work how they do in the real world makes things so much faster and I understand it like the back of my hand.
Hi Will Bachman,
Thank you for sharing your perspective.
By the way, iRender is a professional cloud rendering for Octane and Redshift for all host applications. We provide powerful RTX 4090 / RTX 3090 servers to speed up your renders many times. You can try us at irendering.net. Have a nice day!
Also never for get that post processing and compositing can do you all the difference in video.
It seems octane has better contrast, but that can be fixed in post.
Octane was double the render time? That's all I need to know.
With standard settings. With dialed in settings, it's usually 20% faster than Redshift
yoo u need expert to compair man i use redshfit and octane the 2 render is same speed aprox come on man whats ur setting man :)))))))
plis add SSS material and Displacement
If you're lazy get Octane, if you are a perfectionist use Redshift.
Octane looks more exact because it gets unbiased lighting. Redshift lets you define the lighting. If you are getting better results in Octane it could be due to lack of knowledge in Redshift. Redshift is harder to learn. Octane gets me better results in macro "beeple style scenes" Redshift gets me better results on micro, camera focused tabletop scenes. Then again I am biased, the engines are not, sometimes: ahhh word pun hehehe...
I like the way your brain works lol... im at a weird crossroads because I'm "aeight" w/ Octane because like Beeple I do everydays as well, but my wife is really killing it w/ Redshift in her own commercial works and the rest of the world... so i kinda feel the insane peer pressure to just go ahead, learn and master Redshift.
@@switzonthegreat spot on.
used in the tests the new Redshift RT?
the worst comparison ever, sorry. The person who did this clearly has little knowledge of both engines.
Redshift best quality and speed
Yes, sir! Thank you and wish you have a nice day!
not sure both engine setting is same. If it dose, redshift is time-saving.
This comparisson is biased and has no precise data.
Seems to me like the render settings have been left untouched. As #Octane settings are way to high (16.000 samples) by default, but realistically you only use about 1000 samples depending on the scene ... so 16x less samples ;)
Hi pixelasm,
Thank you for your comment.
iRender is a powerful cloud rendering service for Redshift and Octane. We provide powerful RTX 4090 / 3090 servers to speed up your renders many times. You can try us at irendering.net. Have a nice day!