Thanks for sharing. I do the same. for steps, I do 20 and check the composition and then 40 for the final output. CFG: from 4.5 - 5.5 depending on the complexity of the prompt.
Again very useful, thank you! I was scratching my head as to which parameter would do what... What is your personal opinion? What did you deduce from the test, what parameters do you think gave the best picture?
Thank you! For me personally, i am using these: sampler: euler, scheduler: sgm_uniform, steps: 20 for (finding the composition), 40 (final image), cfg: 4.5 - 5.5 to make the model follow the prompt.
I'm getting a lot of all black images, do you know why? 40 steps, CFG scale 5.4, Euler, SGM Uniform, CLIP + T5, Clip l, Clip G, and T5XXL loaded, 1440x1440. Rendered in SwarmUI(uses comfyui background)
TBH, I stick with Euler and whatever scheduler seems to work. Unless one has time to generate like 20 images with each possible combination of samplers and schedulers, it is pretty hard to know how it affect the prompt you are trying to craft. Some combinations clearly work better for some concepts, but I wish there was less choices of samplers and schedulers (in some sense, of course options are nice), and better prompt understanding instead.
I, too, share the same opinion. It took me nearly 6 hours (with breaks in between) to generate all these images, and it’s just not practical to keep generating so many when adjusting the prompt. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
@@CodeCraftersCorner btw thanks for trying these out, I personally simply try to prompt things that didn't or did work with earlier models while swapping samplers and schedulers, so it is nice to see some sort of structured overview too.
It would be nice that when you do these videos you would, at the end, flat out say what your favorite settings are for what kind of art. Just tell us what to use.
Thanks for the feedback! For me personally, i am using these: sampler: euler, scheduler: sgm_uniform, steps: 20 for (finding the composition), 40 (final image), cfg: 4.5 - 5.5 to make the model follow the prompt.
think of it like a mathematical process that takes noise and interprets it a certain way, you will get different results and completely different final images depending on which one you use with different models. Some are based on similar processes so they have similar outcomes, but you will need to test them all to see what you prefer most
Can we please talk about the fact that all the the Roman numbers on the clock are correct???!!!! That is nuts!!!!!
I was also surprised!
For me best settings are: sampler-euler, scheduler-sgm_uniform, steps-40, cfg-5.5. Great for realism and art.
Thanks for sharing. I do the same. for steps, I do 20 and check the composition and then 40 for the final output. CFG: from 4.5 - 5.5 depending on the complexity of the prompt.
thank you my friend
Again very useful, thank you! I was scratching my head as to which parameter would do what... What is your personal opinion? What did you deduce from the test, what parameters do you think gave the best picture?
Thank you! For me personally, i am using these: sampler: euler, scheduler: sgm_uniform, steps: 20 for (finding the composition), 40 (final image), cfg: 4.5 - 5.5 to make the model follow the prompt.
thank you!!
Thanks you! That's was fast!
I'm getting a lot of all black images, do you know why? 40 steps, CFG scale 5.4, Euler, SGM Uniform, CLIP + T5, Clip l, Clip G, and T5XXL loaded, 1440x1440. Rendered in SwarmUI(uses comfyui background)
Can you try at a lower resolution? Also, try to update ComfyUI to the latest version.
TBH, I stick with Euler and whatever scheduler seems to work. Unless one has time to generate like 20 images with each possible combination of samplers and schedulers, it is pretty hard to know how it affect the prompt you are trying to craft. Some combinations clearly work better for some concepts, but I wish there was less choices of samplers and schedulers (in some sense, of course options are nice), and better prompt understanding instead.
I, too, share the same opinion. It took me nearly 6 hours (with breaks in between) to generate all these images, and it’s just not practical to keep generating so many when adjusting the prompt. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
@@CodeCraftersCorner btw thanks for trying these out, I personally simply try to prompt things that didn't or did work with earlier models while swapping samplers and schedulers, so it is nice to see some sort of structured overview too.
It would be nice that when you do these videos you would, at the end, flat out say what your favorite settings are for what kind of art. Just tell us what to use.
Thanks for the feedback! For me personally, i am using these: sampler: euler, scheduler: sgm_uniform, steps: 20 for (finding the composition), 40 (final image), cfg: 4.5 - 5.5 to make the model follow the prompt.
could you explain what model sampling is?
Hello, I'll try. The sampler dictates the noisy image will change to a detail one. The model sampling shift how this happens.
think of it like a mathematical process that takes noise and interprets it a certain way, you will get different results and completely different final images depending on which one you use with different models. Some are based on similar processes so they have similar outcomes, but you will need to test them all to see what you prefer most
Not impressed. What is 3.5 supposed to offer?
Hello is a diffusion based model. So we can expect same improvements as with sd1.5, sdxl models.