Why the nuclear arms race is on again | Mapped Out

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 тра 2024
  • After the Cold war, the fear of nuclear annihilation seemed like a thing of the past. But hostilities between the superpowers are on the rise again - and so are the world’s nuclear stockpiles. Russia is throwing nuclear threats, the United States is flashing its nuclear saber and China is rapidly expanding its arsenal. It's time to wake up.
    Chapters:
    00:00 Intro
    01:07 The history of nuclear deterrence as a survival factor
    03:09 Russia attacking Ukraine revives old rivalry with NATO
    07:18 There are no treaties which would limit their rivalry
    08:28 Other countries are increasing their arsenal
    10:53 Where does that leave us?
    Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/deutsche...
    For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
    Follow DW on social media:
    ►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
    ►Twitter: / dwnews
    ►Instagram: / dwnews
    ►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
    Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch

КОМЕНТАРІ • 838

  • @nelotharen8599
    @nelotharen8599 14 днів тому +183

    so we all die because of the egos of 3 boomers in charge?

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 14 днів тому +18

      One thing is certain - our Almighty Creator will not allow humans to destroy our beautiful planet and all life on it. He has a purpose for us and no one can prevent him fulfilling that purpose. (Isaiah 45:18) Very shortly he’s going to make drastic changes here on earth by removing all human governments along with everyone who causes pain and suffering for others. (Daniel 2:44; Proverbs 2:21, 22) His heavenly Kingdom government is currently poised to take over the rulership of the entire earth and bring true peace and security and untold blessings to mankind. (Luke 4:43; Matthew 6:10; Micah 4:3, 4) As the King of the Kingdom, Jesus will lovingly care for each and every one of his subjects. No one will be in want of anything. (Isaiah 65:21, 22) Psalm 37:10, 11 says: “Just a little while longer and the wicked will be no more; you will look at where they were, and they will not be there. But the meek will possess the earth, and they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace”.

    • @TalibanAtrocities
      @TalibanAtrocities 14 днів тому

      ​@@sandradixon6205Google 'hiroshima' or 'nagasaki'
      Then ask Google if 'god' was on holiday then...maybe taking a well deserved nap 🤔🤦‍♂️

    • @francribaj6506
      @francribaj6506 13 днів тому +12

      I believe that is the case, yes

    • @billyflores1448
      @billyflores1448 11 днів тому

      No we all die cause people blaming Democrats instead of helping they side with Russia and blame democrats lol

    • @rodrigobarroso6075
      @rodrigobarroso6075 11 днів тому

      No, because of capitalism and its ever capital expansion essence embedded on it.

  • @A.Curmudgeon
    @A.Curmudgeon 14 днів тому +108

    "Why the nuclear arms race is on again?" Because dealing with the environment was WAY too hard, so we went back to what we're good at. War and fear of war. Good job monkies.

    • @crayonsukrou913
      @crayonsukrou913 13 днів тому +3

      Security is primary needs, the most important one at that. It is much MUCH more important than "LiMiT gLoBaL wArMiNg tO oNe DeGrEEE cEnTiGrAdE".

    • @mr.afrikaans1747
      @mr.afrikaans1747 11 днів тому +1

      Bit racist…

    • @henben9215
      @henben9215 11 днів тому +6

      @@mr.afrikaans1747I think racism is the least of your worries pal

    • @djvdtweel
      @djvdtweel 11 днів тому +2

      monke

    • @Bintzak
      @Bintzak 10 днів тому +1

      @@mr.afrikaans1747Aapje 😝

  • @mrm7058
    @mrm7058 14 днів тому +379

    I guess the TV show "Fallout" was released at the right time.

    • @robson668
      @robson668 14 днів тому +58

      Would like few more seasons before the bombs fall.

    • @scottwebb4722
      @scottwebb4722 14 днів тому +25

      The Brotherhood of Steel wishes to know your location

    • @MrDanisve
      @MrDanisve 14 днів тому +2

      Not seen the TV show. But "Fallout" stopped being a problem once we got fusion bombs.
      So allready think the show is silly from its name without seing it.

    • @thatoneguy7816
      @thatoneguy7816 14 днів тому +8

      @@MrDanisve ofc its silly bro. its a show based on a video game. but you should still give it a shot. its got some good actors and it keeps you reeled in, and like every show it has its downs but its a good watch if you dont know what youre in the mood for.

    • @Sieupeaici000
      @Sieupeaici000 14 днів тому +1

      @@robson668 just to gather experience 🤓

  • @losbones
    @losbones 13 днів тому +31

    Consider that 31 countries are under the 'US nuclear umbrella'. That was excluded from this video.

  • @drhxa
    @drhxa 13 днів тому +17

    If you haven't yet, watch the movie Threads (1984), if you dare. It is not for the faint of heart. Yet, we must watch it, share it, and realize what we're risking by continuing on this path. This is not a time to bury our heads in the sand.

  • @kazomazo6646
    @kazomazo6646 14 днів тому +54

    Vault-Tec is now preparing the vualts 😆

    • @mysticmarble94
      @mysticmarble94 12 днів тому +5

      Didn't Zuck recently purchase his own vault-sized doomsday home 💀

    • @kazomazo6646
      @kazomazo6646 12 днів тому +6

      @@mysticmarble94 yes, not only him but many other celebrities, and wealthy people.

    • @leemagaming696
      @leemagaming696 8 днів тому

      Zuckerbergs already making his in hawaii lol

  • @Zero-Sun
    @Zero-Sun 14 днів тому +114

    Sad times

    • @Zero-Sun
      @Zero-Sun 14 днів тому +7

      @@abhilash2417 ???? As far as I know nukes don't discriminate between rich or poor

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 14 днів тому +4

      Yes, very sad times indeed, but there is some good news that most people are unaware of. Our Creator is very shortly going to step in and solve all our problems for us. He alone has the desire and the power to do so. His righteous and just heavenly Kingdom government, about which Jesus preached when he was on earth, will very soon completely remove all human governments along with everyone causing harm to others. (Luke 4:43; Matthew 6:10; Daniel 2:44; Proverbs 2:21, 22) As the King of the Kingdom, Jesus will bring true peace and security to all earth’s inhabitants. (Micah 4:3, 4) He will undo all the damage that’s been done, and he will lovingly care for each of his citizens. (Isaiah 65:21, 22) The whole earth will be filled with joy and laughter. Tears of sorrow will be turned into tears of joy. (Revelation 21:4) These wonderful changes are imminent!

    • @fatmanjstyle5306
      @fatmanjstyle5306 14 днів тому

      What did you expect

    • @larissagildarasina7580
      @larissagildarasina7580 14 днів тому +3

      right. In a time when all are lying, you can only trust God and that's ok with me.

    • @user-pc1vk2ku2n
      @user-pc1vk2ku2n 14 днів тому

      The Russians have cosmos 2499 satellites there kinetic weapons way more powerful than nuclear weapons

  • @netsiteing
    @netsiteing 14 днів тому +65

    MAD indeed

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 14 днів тому

      Indeed! When they already have the ability to destroy our planet multiple times over, it is absolute insanity to keep spending billions each year producing even more nukes. When you add to this all the other major problems threatening mankind it is very clear that world leaders are a complete and utter failure. That’s why very shortly all human governments are going to be removed by our Creator’s government, the Kingdom of God, which will then take over the rulership of the entire earth. (Luke 4:43; Matthew 6:10; Daniel 2:44) Together with true peace and security, it will bring wonderful blessings to all mankind. (Micah 4:3, 4) As the King of the Kingdom, Jesus will lovingly provide for all the needs of each one of his citizens. (Isaiah 65:21, 22) Tears of sorrow will be replaced by tears of joy. Revelation 21:4 says: “And he (God) will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more. Neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away”.

    • @DumbledoreMcCracken
      @DumbledoreMcCracken 14 днів тому

      SAD, not MAD

    • @ManojSingh-bg9ue
      @ManojSingh-bg9ue 13 днів тому +7

      @@DumbledoreMcCracken Simultaneous assured destruction??

    • @BLACKLOTUSUK
      @BLACKLOTUSUK 12 днів тому

      M.A.D = Mutual Assured Destruction
      S.A.D = Simultaneous Assured Destruction
      Simultaneous = Mutual
      //->SAD = MAD
      It’s both MAD and SAD.

    • @BraveFencer
      @BraveFencer 9 днів тому

      @@DumbledoreMcCrackenlol he means MAD Mutual assured destruction meaning the end of humanity

  • @Truthonly2
    @Truthonly2 14 днів тому +39

    They want to destroy the enemy if attacked but the truth is they will destroy each other and the world with them.

    • @romeltx3980
      @romeltx3980 14 днів тому +1

      who gave this Earth to America ? do they have ownership papers ! why are they acting like they own the Earth and that they are masters and the rest of us just nothing ! this needs to stop if NOT then yes it needs to be changed replaced by any means even if nuclear changes is ok

    • @AleXcsGaming
      @AleXcsGaming 10 днів тому +1

      Thats the point. you destroy me, you destroy the world

  • @alter-nator
    @alter-nator 14 днів тому +139

    Just prepare people. Remember the Nuclear Rule of Thumb

    • @thechrisandphaedrusshow
      @thechrisandphaedrusshow 14 днів тому +22

      Duck and cover!

    • @ninzki143
      @ninzki143 14 днів тому +9

      Mutually Assured Destruction AKA MAD!!! Everyone loses... at least someone's smart lol

    • @larissagildarasina7580
      @larissagildarasina7580 14 днів тому

      I did. I bought two tin cans of canned beans, heard they are full of PFAS. If I don't die poisoned, it means no nuke will be released. claro?

    • @jonny5714
      @jonny5714 14 днів тому +5

      @@thechrisandphaedrusshow no you silly billy you have to stop drop and roll duh.

    • @Robert_Douglass
      @Robert_Douglass 14 днів тому +21

      The rule --
      When you see the reflection of a double flash (unless you happened to be facing it when it went off because then you're flash-blind) you must first lift your mushroom head -- if the resulting mushroom cloud is smaller than your mushroom head, head for the hills. If it's not... sit down, crack open a cold one, and enjoy the show, cause it's the last one you'll ever see.

  • @nilakshandissanayake1379
    @nilakshandissanayake1379 13 днів тому +7

    This is pure madness. Mankind should get rid of all nuclear warheads. Is this the great filter that all civilizations cannot get through.

    • @drhxa
      @drhxa 13 днів тому +1

      Yes it is madness and it appears to be a reasonable example of a "great filter". Civilizations grow too powerful, fail to collaborate, and destroy themselves. Nevertheless we must try to change course, because the alternative will leave us wishing we had died directly in one of the initial blasts

    • @rizwanhussain645
      @rizwanhussain645 11 днів тому +1

      True, for example it is frightening that an unhinged psychopath such as Narendra Modi of 🇮🇳 has his fingers over the nuclear button.

  • @DavidGitongawriter
    @DavidGitongawriter 14 днів тому +7

    It's almost laughable if it wasn't that serious.
    What did they expect when they try to inflict 'strategic defeats' and supply weapons to districts of other countries and push for their independence?
    Did they expect these nations to fold back?
    I not a politician but even I can see how such nations would decide to protect themselves from such threats.

  • @Bshipbuilder
    @Bshipbuilder 14 днів тому +10

    Our rulers are psychopaths.

  • @DumbledoreMcCracken
    @DumbledoreMcCracken 14 днів тому +11

    not M.A.D., self assured destruction S.A.D.

  • @yte549
    @yte549 14 днів тому +30

    China is increasing the nuke, it's a serious concern for India, We should also increase it

    • @aaron11679
      @aaron11679 14 днів тому +10

      You are on the menu, nothing to concern

    • @KyojuroRengoku98
      @KyojuroRengoku98 14 днів тому +3

      India 😂

    • @yte549
      @yte549 14 днів тому +1

      @@KyojuroRengoku98 Pi gistaniiii 💩💩💩💩

    • @yte549
      @yte549 14 днів тому +1

      @@aaron11679 lol ....India also have nuke...

    • @yte549
      @yte549 14 днів тому

      @@KyojuroRengoku98 P i gistaniii beg some money from IMF😂😂😂

  • @neef1532
    @neef1532 2 дні тому +1

    “Have we stumbled into a nuclear arms race” bro I just flip burgers 😭😭

  • @Zlorthishen
    @Zlorthishen 14 днів тому +48

    it never stopped, you 'people' just stopped paying attention

    • @GwynBleys
      @GwynBleys 14 днів тому +2

      Well there was no Russia in the game between 1990 and 2000

    • @juanspyro4658
      @juanspyro4658 14 днів тому +7

      ​@@GwynBleysThere were no Soviets, just Russians who had nukes - you also ignore China who has been growing their arsenal the whole time since that period and before

  • @factologyprofessor2869
    @factologyprofessor2869 14 днів тому +7

    6:48 they are going into areas they didn’t use to go before. Now that’s escalation

  • @personnamed2764
    @personnamed2764 14 днів тому +38

    When hollywood stops making movies. Im gonna panic

    • @GwynBleys
      @GwynBleys 14 днів тому +5

      I mean, are you kidding me or what? Movies business is dead. Its TV shows now

    • @nothanks9503
      @nothanks9503 13 днів тому +1

      They will keep making moving as long as the power stays on

    • @b.aorellana6079
      @b.aorellana6079 13 днів тому

      The movie business isn't dead. Not cool for saying that. 😡😡😡😡😡

  • @fredlandry6170
    @fredlandry6170 12 днів тому +7

    We humans haven’t learned anything.

  • @MrMokey24
    @MrMokey24 14 днів тому +5

    Ukraine shows the world how dangerous it can be to not have a nuclear deterrence. They handed their stockpile over to Russia. What people are worried about is not nuclear armageddon, but traditional warfare, which can bring just as much devastation.

    • @AJolie009
      @AJolie009 14 днів тому

      They gave up nuclear weapons they didn’t have operational control over nor the launch sequence for. And they’ve done so under US pressure, that wanted them to join the NPT as a non nuclear state. Above all, they’ve received substantial compensation (received nuclear fuel rods and energy debt write-offs from Russia). What’s the point of keeping nuclear weapons they can’t even use? They didn’t even have a nuclear program to maintain those weapons.

    • @craigsvt758
      @craigsvt758 10 днів тому

      I disagree. There will never be a traditional war on US soil - too many armed and well trained civilians. That’s where our enemies would rather defeat us using nukes. That would definitely cause a lot destruction..

  • @agentmj08
    @agentmj08 14 днів тому +7

    Time to invest in Vault-Tec.

  • @thegreatdane3627
    @thegreatdane3627 14 днів тому +84

    we need an EU nuclear umbrella, to replace the US nuclear umbrella.

    • @user-sm1eu1sl1r
      @user-sm1eu1sl1r 14 днів тому

      seriously???? you think the world will be ok if the bombs fall around Europe? you think your life will be good????

    • @TheJorrry
      @TheJorrry 14 днів тому +22

      Not happening because most of EU people are against being heavily armed. They often criticize US being making so much weapons

    • @royk7712
      @royk7712 14 днів тому +43

      USA have a pet, it's called Japan and EU

    • @mightybagrutlord
      @mightybagrutlord 14 днів тому +17

      France has it and it is both in the EU & NATO

    • @thegreatdane3627
      @thegreatdane3627 14 днів тому +9

      @@TheJorrry there is quite a lot of support for increased military spending in most EU countries right now. Not sure how the majority feel about nukes though.

  • @momentomori5263
    @momentomori5263 13 днів тому +2

    "uranium fever' starts playing*

  • @jamesmatipwiri3765
    @jamesmatipwiri3765 14 днів тому +18

    Problem is wanting to having military bases in other countries And then blaming them for doing exactly the same

    • @ATLhood4Life
      @ATLhood4Life 13 днів тому +1

      Its a big difference as in to why and how this came to be for the US I assume you are speaking on

    • @user-pv2gc5qm2x
      @user-pv2gc5qm2x 12 днів тому +1

      The difference is that other counties are willing to join the group of alliance or nato in other words voluntarily, compared to how russia forced other countries through ultimatums, wars, and other barbaric methods to join their powers...... Let other countries choose what they want, like Ukraine wanted to be closer to europe for better life without corruption, or at least try to...... Does nato try to attack other countries to get full control over them in modern history? With russia it's Chechnya, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Lithuania conflicts....

  • @JN-xb6pq
    @JN-xb6pq 13 днів тому +20

    "If Russia and China join forces". Really? If?🙄

    • @AkashSidhu-vk5jw
      @AkashSidhu-vk5jw 12 днів тому +1

      Why if? Given the current climate after Ukraine war, it’s clear. Also India taking “somewhat” neutral stand suggests it’s Russia + China + India.
      Lot of diplomatic efforts should be started to or probably are underway to manage the balance, and not letting the world very polarized

    • @garethdelux9266
      @garethdelux9266 11 днів тому

      @@AkashSidhu-vk5jw + Iran, Turkey, most arabian countries and several African and pacific islands will also side with China and I guess Palestine.
      Hard to know whos the evil one but if war is based on greed then I guess it's us.

    • @LilRyan8808
      @LilRyan8808 10 днів тому +1

      @@AkashSidhu-vk5jwthey already basically are

  • @davidstevenson9517
    @davidstevenson9517 13 днів тому +14

    The Nuclear Arms Race restarted in 2001. When the U.S. announced they were "re-furbishing" their nuclear arsenal, Russia warned that:
    (1) it wasn't in the spirit of NPT i.e. arms reduction, not refurbishing or upgrading, and
    (2) such a move by the U.S. would force Russia to do likewise.
    The United States ignored these warnings and proceeded anyway.

    • @ConradProteus
      @ConradProteus 12 днів тому +4

      USA has very advance inteligence and if they did this they must have have solid reason based on future scenario projections

    • @rodrigobarroso6075
      @rodrigobarroso6075 11 днів тому

      Future scenario projections they caused to worsen.

    • @ConradProteus
      @ConradProteus 10 днів тому +3

      @@rodrigobarroso6075 Do You have a diploma in military scenarios projections? Thats cool

  • @yunfenglu6619
    @yunfenglu6619 14 днів тому +3

    Busy building a bunker in my backyard right now

  • @commoneuropeanstarling
    @commoneuropeanstarling 14 днів тому +2

    Time to make Threads II.

  • @Linkwii64
    @Linkwii64 12 днів тому +1

    Bring it on.

  • @CraftyF0X
    @CraftyF0X 14 днів тому +8

    C'mon, what could go wrong ?

  • @pablooliveira3559
    @pablooliveira3559 14 днів тому +1

    very hard times ahead indeed...unfortunelly

  • @Zeptre_
    @Zeptre_ 10 днів тому +1

    Peace not war, we are all human. No one in the mainstream advocating for a peace treaty

  • @QiuQiuChannel-ni3xj
    @QiuQiuChannel-ni3xj 14 днів тому +1

    ....!? This is a good time to play fall out again

  • @urbansenicar81
    @urbansenicar81 14 днів тому +3

    There are borders between states.
    There are borders between regional powers.
    Then there are borders between super powers.
    To even talk about nukes shows you that neither Russo Ukraine war, nor Gaza conflict is a war between states, because they'd never be used / states don't have them.

    • @roman648
      @roman648 11 днів тому

      Super-power sponsored proxy wars.

  • @washingtonsibusisosanga2087
    @washingtonsibusisosanga2087 12 днів тому +3

    can someone please educate me, so if lets say Russia and USA were to fight a nuclear war, if either of them were to drop those nuclear bombs, cant they be intercepted ?? is it an endgame once they are dropped or they can somewhat be shot down?

    • @BLACKLOTUSUK
      @BLACKLOTUSUK 12 днів тому

      Once released they drop. Unless a god or alien intervenes that nuke canNOT be stopped. Unfortunately

    • @jerrycoob4750
      @jerrycoob4750 12 днів тому

      In the 70s the US and Soviet Russia signed a treaty limiting their Anti-Ballistic Missile arsenals to 100 for each of their capitals and 100 for another site in each of their countries. See, if one country builds a ton of ABMs they could theoretically nuke the other country with impunity, so this threat incentivizes their adversary develop offensive countermeasures so their ICBMs can remain an effective deterrent, spiralling into a big expensive arms race of offensive vs. defensive weapons. The only winning move is not to play.

    • @rexpectmusic468
      @rexpectmusic468 10 днів тому

      Imagine this Russia launches its nukes that are ready to be launched we are talking hundreds of icbms on each side they shoot up outside the atmosphere flys awhile and then comes down on the enemy’s country each icbm has 8 nuclear warheads inside of it so when it’s coming down it detaches all 8 meaning thousands of nuclear warheads it’s just not possible man

    • @PainToTheWorld1272
      @PainToTheWorld1272 9 днів тому +3

      It is much harder to intercept a nuke, mainly due to the fact that it deploys warheads once it’s close to the target which is like multiple miniature missiles that scatter, and some of those warheads are decoys meant to counter interception

    • @Ruzzky_Bly4t
      @Ruzzky_Bly4t 8 днів тому +2

      Some nukes can be intercepted, yes. Hence why the US and Russia have such large arsenals. If each nuke would connect, you wouldn't need 5000 of them. The US probably has much better intercepting capabilities than Russia, but if 1/5 goes through, that's still thousands of warheads.

  • @glumour3081
    @glumour3081 14 днів тому +1

    Try making a video with a narrative about "which countries don't want to be demilitarized"...

  • @ryanwiles9847
    @ryanwiles9847 13 днів тому +2

    What I don't understand is why you would realistically need more nuclear weapons if what is currently stockpiled would have the ability to decimate the world/at least the country you're in conflict or apposition to. Like, other than a flex, why would it matter if you can destroy all of a countries cities ten times over where as an opposing country can "only" do that 5 times. Can someone enlighten me?

    • @deepnijjar5
      @deepnijjar5 11 днів тому +1

      Yeah it's like trying to water your garden while it's raining

    • @Simon-d
      @Simon-d 11 днів тому +5

      “The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist-deep in gasoline, one with three matches and the other with five" Carl Sagan

  • @jjadna
    @jjadna 10 днів тому +1

    Need something more aggressive than nukes

  • @killerbee1974
    @killerbee1974 14 днів тому +8

    Cant wait to be in Fallout

  • @agoogleuseranonymous2658
    @agoogleuseranonymous2658 14 днів тому +25

    Indian and Pakistan match each other. Britain + France vs China. NK vs Israel. USA vs Russia. Everybody wins.

    • @Editsdevil
      @Editsdevil 14 днів тому

      I think you didn't hear that china is increasing it nuclear weapons to what US and Russia have

    • @sanjomorgan
      @sanjomorgan 14 днів тому +7

      Everybody dies you mean

    • @MookieHeresy
      @MookieHeresy 14 днів тому +5

      mfs in south america chilling right now

    • @davidcwitkin6729
      @davidcwitkin6729 14 днів тому +1

      And ultimately everyone loses

    • @neilnelson7603
      @neilnelson7603 14 днів тому

      ​@@sanjomorganExcept Africa and South America

  • @MrLahochi
    @MrLahochi 12 днів тому

    Olge hea, viiige Kaka eestist välja !❤(üle peipsi)

  • @goodintentions5189
    @goodintentions5189 14 днів тому +23

    So UK and France are as small as provinces in these other big countries ?

    • @ricardosmythe2548
      @ricardosmythe2548 14 днів тому +1

      They are and yet they maintain the ability to project military power globally both fielding genuine blue water navies. While most of those bigger countries can only operate with any reasonable level of effectiveness within there own regions.....

    • @only_fair23
      @only_fair23 14 днів тому +10

      You didn't know that? China and the US are roughly the size of Europe and Russia is close to twice their size

    • @cashcash5995
      @cashcash5995 14 днів тому +1

      @@ricardosmythe2548 No more .

    • @rl7586
      @rl7586 14 днів тому

      Yes

    • @ricardosmythe2548
      @ricardosmythe2548 13 днів тому

      @@cashcash5995 you might not like that fact but that is the current situation. That's before both nations planned increases in military spending

  • @Erkcan
    @Erkcan 11 днів тому +1

    4:53 NATO's Eastern members also include Turkey, which is not being shown on the map.

  • @HidrHjjhh
    @HidrHjjhh 4 дні тому

    The most tragic thing about our species that's we are professionals when it comes to destroying ourselves

  • @patrickgz
    @patrickgz 14 днів тому +9

    stumbled? more like fumbled into another arms race

  • @ad_astra468
    @ad_astra468 14 днів тому +3

    The EU needs its own nuclear stockpile, both to protect itself in case the USA ditches it and to avoid having three poles which is the most unstable world order. Not for nothing it’s the world order Orwell chose for his dystopian book 1984.

    • @philforshaw6693
      @philforshaw6693 10 днів тому +2

      Poland are on the way. They even got a nickname European texts 😂

  • @vander1773
    @vander1773 12 днів тому +1

    We need vault tech

  • @apuuvah
    @apuuvah 14 днів тому +1

    You do understand the concept of nuclear deterrence, right? It kinda needs nuclear weapons. So, in the future there will be more deterrence.

  • @MrLoobu
    @MrLoobu 14 днів тому +5

    It was never off lmao

  • @darrenwestley7348
    @darrenwestley7348 11 днів тому

    Go for it
    I'm gonna hide under the table, lol

  • @jonaspete
    @jonaspete 10 днів тому +2

    We need Vault-Tec

    • @PokerSpiral
      @PokerSpiral 6 днів тому

      we do NOT need vault tec😭😭 they gon cause a nuclear war

  • @chanthywalkabout
    @chanthywalkabout 14 днів тому +1

    What can happen there ?

  • @mathieucaron4957
    @mathieucaron4957 6 днів тому

    Instead, you should make a video that explains why many people need this video to know what's going on. It's like explaining that the sun will still be hot tomorrow. Everyone who is normal knows this perfectly well.

  • @vindc11
    @vindc11 10 днів тому

    Through game theory we know that regardless whether we concider them as an enemy, coperation and forgivness is key which is quite the opposite of what the US is doing just blatenly labeling them as mortal enemies and shooting down all possibilities for negotiations

  • @thingsido9545
    @thingsido9545 12 днів тому

    4:53 you forgot to color the Netherlands

  • @vanceofthetube
    @vanceofthetube 13 днів тому +4

    Russia is threatening us with nuclear weapons.. proceeds to show US nuclear weapons in Belgium😂

  • @happyhippo5488
    @happyhippo5488 14 днів тому +6

    Does anyone know how many nuclear weapons would be needed to cause a global nuclear winter?

    • @VVayVVard
      @VVayVVard 14 днів тому +4

      I don't think anybody knows for sure. It's going to depend also on how many are surface vs air bursts, local soil / ground characteristics, weather patterns etc.

    • @snapdragon6601
      @snapdragon6601 14 днів тому +1

      It could vary widely, depending on how many were used, how large the weapons are that would be used in terms of explosive yield, and perhaps most importantly how they were fused. If they were set to detonate with an airburst, hundreds or thousands of feet above the target, like what happened with the two bombs used over Japan in WW2, it maximizes the area destroyed but the radioactive fallout is minimized. If they were set for a ground burst, such as a surprise attack on another country in order to destroy their nuclear missiles in their underground silos before they can be fired in retaliation, they would explode after hitting the ground, churning up tons and tons of dirt that becomes highly irradiated and thrown high up into the atmosphere where it can remain for weeks or months before raining down around the globe as fallout. That's what could at least partially block out the sun, preventing crops and plants from growing.

    • @leosalas41ify
      @leosalas41ify 14 днів тому

      In a report done in the 90's by nuclear scientist on a TV program, he claimed 7.

    • @yoobinjung35
      @yoobinjung35 13 днів тому +2

      ​@@leosalas41ify clearly this is not true, think of the number of detonations from tests alone

    • @leosalas41ify
      @leosalas41ify 13 днів тому

      @@yoobinjung35
      I think the idea was at the relative same time as in a nuclear exchange war scenario.

  • @Alex-hu5eg
    @Alex-hu5eg 14 днів тому +2

    Dont hide behind a tank, it'll melt on you!

  • @quickscope3643
    @quickscope3643 14 днів тому +1

    i am saving to go to Switzerland asap

    • @dammitdan106
      @dammitdan106 14 днів тому +3

      Uh radionuclide fallout, civilization collapse, ecosystem collapse will affect the Swiss too. They have to leave their bunker system when the food runs out.

  • @levicrandall
    @levicrandall 13 днів тому +2

    War. War never changes.

  • @Pfromm007
    @Pfromm007 13 днів тому +1

    All the politicians get protected for continuity of government, and I keep wondering who is going to be left to be governed over?

  • @craigsvt758
    @craigsvt758 10 днів тому +1

    Funny how yall showed Trump with Putin, but Biden is the one pissing him off.

  • @salsanchez2114
    @salsanchez2114 14 днів тому +1

    Israel, North Korea, India and Pakistan also pose significant nuclear threats as do terrorists and potentially soon, Iran. France and Britain also have a significant nuclear weapons' capability.

  • @willdoit222
    @willdoit222 14 днів тому +1

    not bad at all

  • @user-ok2mn4bw7u
    @user-ok2mn4bw7u 14 днів тому +2

    American human rights activist Ajamu Baraka: Ukrainians finally realized that they were being prepared for destruction for the sake of the geostrategic interests of the United States, which have nothing to do with them. The result is massive capitulations on the front line and people avoiding conscription.

    • @bewusstsein3527
      @bewusstsein3527 14 днів тому

      Ukraine has no choice.. being invaded by a communist country is much harder..

  • @dangrie8521
    @dangrie8521 8 днів тому

    ... humans do not want nuclear war and MAD, but a bunch of powerful people will decide for them, in the safety of their highly comfortably bunkers...

  • @Wodion_Yt
    @Wodion_Yt 5 днів тому

    Anyone else hearing “I don’t want to set the world on fire” by the ink spots?

  • @unhingedreality9515
    @unhingedreality9515 14 днів тому +2

    If it can happen, it will happen. The only variable is time.

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 14 днів тому

      Thankfully, human governments won’t be around for much longer because they’re going to be replaced by God’s heavenly government, his Kingdom, which is very shortly going to take over the rulership of the entire earth. (Luke 4:43; Matthew 6:10; Daniel 2:44) Everyone will live in true peace and security and in harmony with each other, our beautiful planet, and all life on it. (Micah 4:3, 4; Isaiah 11:6-9) As the King of the Kingdom, Jesus will lovingly provide for each and every one of his subjects. (Isaiah 65:21, 22) Never again will we live in fear of anyone or anything. (Revelation 21:4) These wonderful changes are imminent!

    • @lilangelpop
      @lilangelpop 8 днів тому +1

      @@sandradixon6205 i’m sorry, but ur imaginary friends aren’t doing anything.

  • @danieltravel
    @danieltravel 11 днів тому +1

    How come you didn’t mention Iran 🇮🇷

  • @blue6gun
    @blue6gun 14 днів тому +1

    Sergey Peskov is a name we should all know and appreciate...

  • @johnlembo2955
    @johnlembo2955 14 днів тому

    Ndiyo, si ipo pale Tegeta kwa ndevu, kubwa nyeupe hivi

  • @krasnavin
    @krasnavin 14 днів тому

    “If you go on with this nuclear arms race, all you are going to do is make the rubble bounce.” ― Winston S. Churchill

    • @trnogger
      @trnogger 14 днів тому +1

      Ah yes, the same Winston Churchill that put pressure on the US to start a nuclear war against the Warsaw Pact right after WW2. That's the last guy you want to quote on nuclear weapons use.

  • @TylerGann6692
    @TylerGann6692 14 днів тому

    Hows about each country flexs their best on their own grounds and films in 4k HD with the best cameras available today. 😮🎉

  • @overvygn
    @overvygn 14 днів тому +5

    Just remember; "duck and cover".

    • @SanctuaryLife
      @SanctuaryLife 14 днів тому +1

      Exactly, who cares? Just get under a desk, wait it out and then get back to your school work.

    • @VVayVVard
      @VVayVVard 14 днів тому

      It's a valid method. The principal immediate challenge for those with shelter is glass shards / shrapnel. After that, structural failures and secondary exothermic reactions. Then, ionizing dust, which takes some time to arrive.

    • @ninzki143
      @ninzki143 14 днів тому +6

      Wrong buddy... you don't duck and cover, you grabbed your iPhone and start filming then upload on Tiktok for likes

  • @pontosinterligados
    @pontosinterligados 13 днів тому +1

    Ok UA-cam Channel. Will you inform citizens willing to avoid the war which planet can one escape to? Considering doing so by car

  • @wallaceling6140
    @wallaceling6140 6 днів тому +1

    whatever happens, i just don't wanna be a ghoul 💀

  • @babalsran06
    @babalsran06 14 днів тому +1

    Even aliens are afraid to come earth 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @C1c4da
    @C1c4da 6 днів тому

    I will never understand war.

  • @justinbelk2759
    @justinbelk2759 7 днів тому

    The usa has a nuclear missle defense system but only able to take out about 60% of them

  • @wynetsang
    @wynetsang 14 днів тому

    The End of History and the Last Man by Francis Fukuyama 1992

  • @Pesso317
    @Pesso317 10 днів тому +1

    If we end , we end what can we do ?

  • @Trueknowledgeisfree
    @Trueknowledgeisfree 8 днів тому

    THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE NEVER STOPPED.

  • @eldios831
    @eldios831 14 днів тому +1

    What for...we already have enough to destroy earth 40 time's over....or did we add mars and mercury to the budget

  • @zubrosaworld1530
    @zubrosaworld1530 12 днів тому

    0:20 seconds XD showing Russia 3 times bigger than it really is 🤣🤣

  • @windycitytransit4054
    @windycitytransit4054 7 днів тому

    Why do I always see this as a recent problem?!?!?! Russia doesn’t seem to understand anything

  • @PedroCarvalho-cb5gn
    @PedroCarvalho-cb5gn 14 днів тому

    Shalom
    Para fazer uso do armamento nuclear é preciso sabedoria, agir sem wue gaja condições de revide.
    Shalom

  • @grrlpurpleable
    @grrlpurpleable 14 днів тому +4

    Absolute insanity.

  • @redzisan
    @redzisan 13 днів тому +1

    Because we have half nuts everywhere in power?

  • @DaveNukem
    @DaveNukem 14 днів тому +2

    Bunkers would not be a luxury

    • @nightizzat4574
      @nightizzat4574 13 днів тому +1

      Bunkers with tomb stone above it.

    • @sahibzadasafi1701
      @sahibzadasafi1701 12 днів тому

      😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅​@@nightizzat4574

  • @danielshehta7831
    @danielshehta7831 14 днів тому +1

    It not if, but when

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 14 днів тому

      That might be true if our future was in the hands of world leaders but the truth is that all human governments are very shortly going to be removed by God’s powerful heavenly government, his Kingdom, of which Jesus is the King. (Luke 4:43; Matthew 6:10; Daniel 2:44) Also everyone who causes harm to others will be removed. (Proverbs 2:21, 22) The Kingdom will bring true peace and security and many blessings to earth’s inhabitants. (Micah 4:3, 4; Isa 65:21, 22) Jesus will lovingly care for all the needs of each and every person. Tears of sorrow will be changed into tears of joy. A wonderful future is very near!

  • @pauliewalnuts240
    @pauliewalnuts240 13 днів тому

    Im less concerned with an intentional attack and more concerned with ai ordered launches, false interpretations of attacks causing a nuclear response, or rogue individuals attempting to start war on their own.

  • @ashok3733
    @ashok3733 13 днів тому

    Question why stock up in nuclear? I understand every child competes on how many good toys each other have! But for grown adults it doesn't make sense since 1 nuclear warhead is enough to wipe out everyone and everything!

  • @mathewsthomas5210
    @mathewsthomas5210 12 днів тому +5

    All because of ruthless TYRANTS

  • @selva2412
    @selva2412 14 днів тому +1

    Whoever clicks the button first vs whole world would be result(if anything or anyone survives 😢).

  • @JacobSteinberg75
    @JacobSteinberg75 13 днів тому

    buy your canned foods now brothers. 7 year shelf life. youll be glad you did

    • @Egor_Sagrein
      @Egor_Sagrein 11 днів тому +1

      "и выжившие позавидуют мёртвым"

  • @_ShahriarKabir
    @_ShahriarKabir 12 днів тому

    We all can agree a fact, with the rivalry of US and Russia, we all are going to be doomed even if that is not ours war.

  • @floydstash
    @floydstash 14 днів тому

    Who else is stacking up on cola's and bottlecaps lately?

  • @aldrinfernandez5392
    @aldrinfernandez5392 14 днів тому +1

    We all lose.

  • @SheepofTheShepherd-nu3lz
    @SheepofTheShepherd-nu3lz 14 днів тому

    It could happen