USA vs China Fighter Jets | Balance Of Power | Insider

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 тра 2024
  • The US claims China has been stealing US technology to make their own copycat of the F-22 Raptor, known as the J-20 Mighty Dragon. We compare the stealth, accuracy, and radar technology of the two fighter jets.
    MORE BALANCE OF POWER VIDEOS:
    US Forces vs Houthi Militia In The Red Sea | Balance Of Power | Insider
    • US Forces vs Houthi Mi...
    USA vs China Aircraft Carriers | Balance Of Power | Insider
    • USA vs China Aircraft ...
    Comparing USA and Russia's Best MLRS In Ukraine | Balance Of Power | Insider News
    • Comparing USA and Russ...
    00:00 - Intro
    00:20 - Why Compare the J-20 and F-22?
    01:00 - 5th Gen Fighters
    02:17 - Stealth
    03:49 - Radar
    05:53 - Accuracy
    06:50 - Missiles
    08:05 - Jet Engines
    09:52 - Balance Of Power
    11:03 - Credits
    ------------------------------------------------------
    #china #military #insider
    Insider's mission is to inform and inspire.
    Visit our homepage for the top stories of the day: www.businessinsider.com/
    Insider on Facebook: / insider
    Insider on Instagram: / insider
    Insider on Twitter: / thisisinsider
    Insider on Snapchat: / 2708030621
    Insider on TikTok: / insider
    USA vs China Fighter Jets | Balance Of Power | Insider

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @haldern501
    @haldern501 18 днів тому +1009

    "we don't know much about china's fighter jet.. but ours is WAY better"

    • @evechristmas5248
      @evechristmas5248 17 днів тому +63

      😆😆

    • @weihonglee5330
      @weihonglee5330 17 днів тому +103

      wasted about 8 minutes of my time for this UA-camr-level info.

    • @simonk5571
      @simonk5571 17 днів тому +24

      Yeah it sounds dangerous to be complacent and then surprised later

    • @hoabach1579
      @hoabach1579 17 днів тому +38

      This is a Forest Gump thinking - wishful thinking 🤣

    • @brostelio
      @brostelio 17 днів тому +1

      Well yeah

  • @FraserzhuEd
    @FraserzhuEd 14 днів тому +155

    Ukraine war is Chinese drones fighting Chinese drones😂😂

    • @jianningxu
      @jianningxu 8 днів тому +1

      that's the great work of DJI

    • @SomeoneFromBeijing
      @SomeoneFromBeijing 2 дні тому

      Peak capitalism brought to you by China: selling non-weapons that can be used as weapons, to both sides.

    • @user-bb2ho3wc5p
      @user-bb2ho3wc5p 2 дні тому

      ​@@jianningxuDJI无人机是民用的

  • @blolee-gc1sr
    @blolee-gc1sr 11 днів тому +59

    as a chinese millitary engineer worked for glory PLA AIRFORCE i can tell you one secrect: J20 burns coal

    • @user-zz3wj7dq4h
      @user-zz3wj7dq4h 10 днів тому +2

      lmaoooo

    • @angellim9465
      @angellim9465 9 днів тому +2

      The US wants to believe that J-20 uses water to run their engine. 😅😅😅

    • @kkxxgff
      @kkxxgff 7 днів тому +2

      As a China engineer who has worked in the military industry for 20 years, I am responsible to say that what he said is right.😅

    • @blolee-gc1sr
      @blolee-gc1sr 6 днів тому +2

      @@kkxxgff nice to meet you comrade

    • @user-vo5px7qb5k
      @user-vo5px7qb5k 6 днів тому +1

      What he said is true, he used raw coal imported from Australia

  • @IrfanKhan-nu6iu
    @IrfanKhan-nu6iu 14 днів тому +123

    If Chinese tech is so inferior why US is so worried about Chinese advancements in this area

    • @ShaKa-Ri
      @ShaKa-Ri 12 днів тому +6

      They’re not!

    • @THOTH_v
      @THOTH_v 11 днів тому

      China knows for its copy paste and low quality products.
      Just like iphone and huawei

    • @BOT-ye6tj
      @BOT-ye6tj 11 днів тому +23

      It's normal for you to feel confused, this is a unique way of thinking among Americans. They can do things like thinking that China's economy is collapsing while thinking that China's trade is threatening the United States. Watching European countries like Germany and France strengthen their investment in China, while shouting for foreign investment to escape China, or doing things like using a victorious stance to escape from Afghanistan.

    • @kaimanyu586
      @kaimanyu586 11 днів тому

      @@ShaKa-Ri yeah, it's not like the US is crying literally 24/7 and 365 days a year about China...
      For somebody who is not worried at all, they whine an awful lot about China...
      But thats what losers always do, whine and cry about the winners...

    • @simonyang540
      @simonyang540 11 днів тому

      @@BOT-ye6tj just lie use media very easy.

  • @chrissscottt
    @chrissscottt 18 днів тому +287

    So vague. The only thing he was specific about was the cost of the missiles.

    • @oddyneo
      @oddyneo 18 днів тому +2

      More secrets is better. imo,.

    • @TellenJones
      @TellenJones 18 днів тому +9

      F22 lags behind J20 and F35 in terms of avionics as it's yet to be equipped with EODAS and EOTS. To make it worse, it's hard to upgrade F22 b/c it lacks of an open architecture.

    • @oddyneo
      @oddyneo 18 днів тому +7

      @@TellenJones They updated that??? So what yours point?

    • @KC_Smooth
      @KC_Smooth 18 днів тому +2

      ⁠@@TellenJonesThe F22 is currently getting its avionics upgraded, so it being “hard” to upgrade doesn’t matter since they have a plan in place.

    • @saeeddali3145
      @saeeddali3145 17 днів тому +2

      welcome to the world of the military, everything is an estimate.

  • @albertverduzco
    @albertverduzco 12 днів тому +45

    So if we don't know much about the J20, how can you claim the F22 is the best and better than the F22?

    • @geraldkohar
      @geraldkohar 11 днів тому +10

      US government has a very high pride and dont want their tech to lose to China. So they will have to claim F22 is better no matter what, even if the facts tell otherwise, because their pride will crumble if they have to admit it. So that's why they make this kind of video to make such statement without doing any deep or thorough research.
      So is F22 better than J20? My answer is: could be, but I think we can only know the answer for real after they face each other in real combat, fought by at least 5 different very good fighters. Until then, let's just say they are tied.

    • @korloff4955
      @korloff4955 10 днів тому +3

      that is American's trait

    • @Mikael-np9im
      @Mikael-np9im 9 днів тому +2

      Made in US vs Made in China

    • @kkxxgff
      @kkxxgff 7 днів тому

      This can cover up the corruption of defense funds, otherwise they will ask you that you spend so much money but you can't achieve your goal, and you will not be given any funds in the future. You will wait for your share of funds to be handed down from top to bottom to continue corruption and legal corruption.

    • @AtemerusRhayli
      @AtemerusRhayli 3 дні тому +1

      i dont see anyone trying to go after the F-22. Ask the Iranians in their obsolete F4 Phantoms what happened.

  • @Pwj579
    @Pwj579 18 днів тому +358

    The F-22 has combat experience vs Chinese spy balloons

    • @logic-ally
      @logic-ally 18 днів тому +30

      J20's combat experience vs

    • @MMA-gb6to
      @MMA-gb6to 18 днів тому +65

      @@logic-ally well, it scared F35 off in west pacific, LOL

    • @liamspencer4941
      @liamspencer4941 18 днів тому +16

      @@MMA-gb6to Nah, also that's not really experience.

    • @christopherdrew6997
      @christopherdrew6997 18 днів тому +9

      @@MMA-gb6toyes it scared it off LOL

    • @FixedGearFox
      @FixedGearFox 18 днів тому

      @@MMA-gb6to No, no it did not. The 35 wasnt *allowed* to engage. Go post your 50cent army bs elsewhere.

  • @OldSkuleNerd
    @OldSkuleNerd 18 днів тому +151

    I lost count of how many wrong statements are being made lol wow

    • @knowingyourmind
      @knowingyourmind 18 днів тому +4

      Ok, Bozo. Give three. Explain them, and then back them up with relevant data.

    • @OldSkuleNerd
      @OldSkuleNerd 18 днів тому

      @@knowingyourmind well ok. 1- it takes more than the ability to detect an aircraft and a missle to shoot down any fighter much less an f22 you have to have high frequency relay data to develop a probability/kill ratio high enough to justify the launch other wise you are firing blindly… many low frequency radar sets can detect any object in the sky but to have an P/K solution to hit a moving object you need a high frequency as the object is moving in angles and speeds that require multiple adjustments in real time,
      Most countries have the ability to detect an f35 or even an F22 as in they know it’s there but to plot an intercept…. Even we can’t do it… we tried that the Aegis system which is basically the best we can offer currently was able to plot only THREE PK SOLUTIONS. In over 200 engagements with F35 in drills and none with F22
      That’s one… and it’s documented…
      2-the J20 has the rear cross section and heat signature of an SU37 as it’s power plant is identical to it so on a patriot battery, THAAD, or aegis it roughly looks like a Fiat 500
      3- canards do not generate lift they provide stability due to cross section forces at low speed with a clipped Diamond wing which is the F22 it’s very unstable the f22 overcomes this the same way the B2 and B21 overcome the flying wing design with 3 computers that just made slight aeronautical adjustments in real time…. The J20 cannot do this so similar to the Euro typhoon it has canards to stabilize it… resulting it higher radiation crossection
      Btw the f22 has a computer onboard that has one purpose… to not let the pilot do any flight path change that will cause the aircraft to imply G forces which are lethal to the pilot
      That’s three all are unclassified data presented by the Airforce and joint nato command after evaluation of the F22 program cancellation in 2017

    • @damianodonnell5844
      @damianodonnell5844 18 днів тому +7

      J20 can super cruise without afterburners, the missile types both fighters carry and the radar cross section of both jets

    • @just_some_bigfoot_hacking_you
      @just_some_bigfoot_hacking_you 18 днів тому

      Ok Mr. engineer, clearly u can do better professional assumptions, now make ur own video then.

    • @wolfskid15
      @wolfskid15 17 днів тому +9

      @@knowingyourmind F-22 isn't the most advanced stealth fighter, the F-35 is. Stealth isn't necessarily a planes ability to be detected but targeted at range. While both stealth fighters, the roles of each aircraft and how they achieve those goals are very different. There's three

  • @damianodonnell5844
    @damianodonnell5844 18 днів тому +192

    Did these guys do any research? J20 can super cruise without afterburners since last year with their new ws-15 engines and they are far more reliable than the previous ws10 engines

    • @waisinglee1509
      @waisinglee1509 18 днів тому +8

      The J20A isn't projected to deploy until 2025. Maybe even later if the new WS-15 engines don't work out.

    • @user-fs9kc1vo4o
      @user-fs9kc1vo4o 18 днів тому +4

      涡扇10c就可以超音速巡航了

    • @KC-vx7gj
      @KC-vx7gj 17 днів тому +10

      @@waisinglee1509 That's your wishful thinking

    • @waisinglee1509
      @waisinglee1509 17 днів тому +4

      @@KC-vx7gj Go and do some research.

    • @johnlucas6683
      @johnlucas6683 16 днів тому +6

      Oh really? Has seen actual combat? Any real world experience? Russian military also looked good on paper until it attacked Ukraine.

  • @tanjim4487
    @tanjim4487 18 днів тому +96

    The new WS-15 is a supercruise capable engine and China has already fitted and flown J-20s with ws-15 engine. Of course, this analyst ignored that LMAO

    • @user-rl7mt4gh3o
      @user-rl7mt4gh3o 16 днів тому

      china is a nation of copycat

    • @user-wh9er8pe9n
      @user-wh9er8pe9n 14 днів тому +2

      This cannot be said, try some way to fight the enemy with the art of language

    • @user-ov3lm9nm2g
      @user-ov3lm9nm2g 12 днів тому

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 11 днів тому

      Ws15 is not operational service

    • @UniversalPlaysPage
      @UniversalPlaysPage День тому

      dude the raptors engines were made in the late 80s its 2024 NGAD our 6th gen aircraft will be flying by the time china starts producing the f35 counter.... the j31 which is a copy cat aircraft

  • @yizhong1214
    @yizhong1214 18 днів тому +50

    You’re American of course you would say that!

    • @johnlucas6683
      @johnlucas6683 16 днів тому

      I mean, what has china proven? Russian military also looked good on paper until it invaded Ukraine and revealed how incompetent "the 2nd most powerful military in the world" is.

    • @user-rl7mt4gh3o
      @user-rl7mt4gh3o 16 днів тому

      im american china is a copycat of all nations ripping off things

  • @huotianxian8267
    @huotianxian8267 13 днів тому +9

    His conclusion is largely true between the J20 enter the service in 2017 and F22. It is a remarkable win for the U.S , considering F22 entered the service back in 2005.
    However, J20 has an advantage that , it continued to be produced and improved overtime while F22 production line was closed permanently. There are several iterations after the first batch of J20, notably the new engines WS15 and rumored GaN AESA, this accompanied by the increased production pace (100-120 per year) and better ranged Air to air missile (PL15) . The conclusion of this video may not be so true now.

  • @saworieza
    @saworieza 18 днів тому +9

    Apples Vs Oranges ....

  • @watainiac627
    @watainiac627 18 днів тому +58

    I'm sure there's no way this would have been published if we thought China's were superior to ours, and there's also undoubtedly info they aren't sharing here in a public video, but it's still interesting just to hear some interesting tidbits about fighter jets.

    • @youtuberabbithole6002
      @youtuberabbithole6002 18 днів тому

      America has been way behind China in technology for a very long time imo. I just read an article about China being more advanced than America in 37 out of 44 key technologies researches. Probably why the government pushes the UFO/alien stories so hard because they don't want to admit China is in our airspace.

    • @user-ii7zr3bj9c
      @user-ii7zr3bj9c 18 днів тому

      Watch out you backyard! Chinese Immigrants joint by other Asian ethnics groups are building their new country inside of America!

    • @LiberRaider
      @LiberRaider 18 днів тому

      First of all FALCON PUNCH!!! great pfp. 2nd, I feel like I've seen a few videos that point out where we have weaknesses and where China has advantages. I don't agree that UA-cam would block content that makes the US look vulnerable but maybe naive.

    • @Booz2020
      @Booz2020 18 днів тому

      Dassault Rafale: Please hold Ma 🥖

    • @ryanthomas6063
      @ryanthomas6063 18 днів тому

      There was an individual who spied on the development, who was from China. So, I would back you to say that they weren't superior.

  • @KC-vx7gj
    @KC-vx7gj 17 днів тому +48

    1. When he talks about Radars he should be talking about how powerful the radars that those jets carry, not how difficult they can be detected by other radars. That's still stealth. J20 has the most advance gallium-based radar.
    2. Speaking of maneveurs, he said he didn't have too much data and he said Chinese jets are unimpressive. If you have not enough data, you shouldn't be so conclusive, let alone, so subjective.
    3. He is wrong about the engine too. J20 has been equipped with a new and far more power engine WS15. He needs to get his data updated.
    All in all, he speaks from many subjective opinions based on outdated data, and neglects many key elements. Not a quality video.

    • @nuckerball1259
      @nuckerball1259 17 днів тому +1

      In respect to maneuverability, The ws15 hasn't replaced the ws10 yet, its still very early on in limited adoption. Even then, by looking at the j20s aerodynamic design, its gonna lose a dogfight to the f22 which has much lower wingloading and thrust vectoring. We havent seen thrust vectoring applied to the ws15 equipped j20s yet.

    • @strangewayfaringstranger
      @strangewayfaringstranger 15 днів тому +1

      "One of its earliest versions of a domestically designed engine, the WS-10A, regularly broke down after just 30 hours of use.
      The main difficulty lies in the metallurgy and machining. A single engine on a civilian Boeing 747 airliner, for example, has at least 40,000 parts. Temperatures in that engine can reach as high as 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit, and its fan blades can spin well over 3,000 times a minute during an hours-long flight.
      Blueprints for such an engine can be copied, but the secrets to producing and shaping metal parts that can withstand those temperatures and spin at such tremendous RPM over thousands of hours - not to mention external factors like wind resistance and corrosion - without breaking aren't easy to find."

    • @anthonyk423
      @anthonyk423 15 днів тому

      The new engine for the jet is still in testing and is not even working so what are you talking about. In that case the US could bring the NGAD fighter into the comparison. Also the Chinese don’t have a radar better than the F35 or F/A22. China boasts about its mighty dragon but won’t even give details or its radar cross section

    • @gedwards1968
      @gedwards1968 13 днів тому +1

      Buddy you have no idea what you're talkin bout. In the future keep your comments to yourself, youd seem much smarter and don't comment on something you have no idea what your talkin bout. You need to do research before you start giving opinions and facts on things. I am a f22 designer so i should know but nice try pretending you know what your talkin bout​@strangewayfaringstranger

    • @dddddh1
      @dddddh1 12 днів тому +2

      J-20 is the most agile fifth-generation aircraft, and will eventually be on the turbofan 15, now the air combat is not close combat, will not give you the opportunity to close up. The J-20 is ahead of the F22 in terms of avionics and situational awareness, and its air-to-air missile PL15 has a far greater range than the F22's AIM120 and has a dual-pulse engine. As for the f35, the biggest enemy of the f35 is not the J-20, but the anti-stealth technology and modification potential. The J-20 is also the first in the world without stealth, but the f35 is embarrassed, even because of the common shock of the tail can not supersonic cruise. Then, all the actions the F22 has done, the fourth generation can do. The maneuvering performance of the f22 displayed by the j20 at the Zhuhai Air Show in 2022 simply cannot be done, and there are videos of that day everywhere. Americans like to brag, at the beginning also said that the f22 lift coefficient 2.0, when the Chinese really built the j20 lift coefficient 2.0, only to find that the f22 only 1.5 lift coefficient.

  • @joshcyz
    @joshcyz 17 днів тому +6

    F-22: the balloon killer

    • @xweifu4117
      @xweifu4117 4 дні тому

      One hundred percent, trustworthy

  • @OldSkuleNerd
    @OldSkuleNerd 18 днів тому +21

    His wording and lack of technical knowledge makes me think he was a plumber in the navy

  • @meh27143
    @meh27143 18 днів тому +63

    I'm more curious about how much of the data both fighters are reliable vs. educated guesses. All countries lie and should lie about their weapon capabilities both overselling and underselling them for various reasons. As well as the fact that I'm sure Chinese government has more detailed info on American weapons and vice versa, but those details are never getting leaked to the public. So it feels like there's not even a point to comparing these fighter jets. Because even beyond their capabilities, their numbers and usage also factor into things. Cause if there is to be a China-US conflict, it would happen with an invasion of Taiwan next door to China, rather than both countries bring all their stuff to middle of nowhere and decide to fight on equal terms.

    • @user-ii7zr3bj9c
      @user-ii7zr3bj9c 18 днів тому

      Watch out you backyard! Chinese Immigrants joint by other Asian ethnics groups are building their new country inside of America!

    • @johndroyson7921
      @johndroyson7921 18 днів тому +2

      No no. China has the USA beat for sure... wink*

    • @xxPlaceboxx
      @xxPlaceboxx 18 днів тому +1

      dont be shy shina

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 18 днів тому

      china knows the US FAR better than the US knows china thats for sure. For starters chinese people can understand what you people say in english but you can't understand a lick of mandarin.

    • @mtmadigan82
      @mtmadigan82 18 днів тому +1

      Your along the right lines here, sort of. Everyone lies about their military, but differently. Because they are similar we'll group together china/russia. Those 2 lie and have been seen adding zeros behind different equipmet. Just grossly overstated. Theres a lot of reasons but comes down to a few points. Selling military equipment. That is a very large part of their economy. This goes to countries unable to secure western weapons due to money, sanctions, barred by political concerns. They don't have anyone else to turn to. The chinese are more entrepreneurial. Through various methods of aquiring/stealing western designs and reverse mfg them. To the best of their abilities. When you look at commerical ip theft and the quality of those, it doesnt inspire confidence. But they go to intl arms shows, get booths next to western defense companies and sell copies of theirs at a fraction the price, but with exaggerated capabilities. They may look like ours, but arent even close real world. Getting back to the org question, theres 3 answers. To sell arms, to show their citizens they are superior, and last info warfare with the west. Bluffing to keep everyone at bay. I think russias experience in ukraine has exposed a lot of this already. But they both still benefit by lying all over the place with any chance they get. Heres were the us differs. We undersell our secrets. Speed of aircraft carriers, range of missiles, rockets, planes, armored vehicles etc etc. this is evident in some items in ukraine. Like when they dropped 10 russian aircraft in a week. You think they moved a patriot battery across a hundred plus miles of the most covered land on the planet? Course not, the russians just found out those sams have a bit longer legs than we ever said. So yeah we lie. Its just different than the guys bragging how elite and unstoppable they are. We do because we can lure more in easily to eliminate.

  • @JuanMitt
    @JuanMitt 18 днів тому +115

    Guy says that there are little known about the J-20 and concludes that the f-22 is superior... Lol

    • @droneybaloney6964
      @droneybaloney6964 18 днів тому +7

      You don't have to know much about a sloth to understand that it's not going to outrun a cheetah. In some cases basic observations can tell you a lot.

    • @ritaawudey4451
      @ritaawudey4451 18 днів тому +2

      So how long do we wait, before China publishes the Full capabilities? We use capabilities to rate planes or jets, f-22 is better untill we get the full features of j-20.

    • @user-hi6hl5pz5t
      @user-hi6hl5pz5t 18 днів тому

      @@droneybaloney6964

    • @user-kd3pq3jt9v
      @user-kd3pq3jt9v 18 днів тому +8

      an India-style conclusion. 😂😂😂

    • @raidenj1295
      @raidenj1295 18 днів тому +1

      @@droneybaloney6964And that’s why the J 20 is better than the crash 35

  • @mochen9282
    @mochen9282 15 днів тому +7

    1) J20 has much better radar (GaN AESA). During the time F22 was developed, GaN radar hadn't invented yet.
    2) J20 has better electronic. The chips on F22 was intel 586 level.
    3) J20 has better missile. Before deployment of AIM-260, USA dont have a missile that can match PL15. In the mean time, PLA already has the PL17 ready.
    4) J20 certainly can supercruise. The WS10C engine currently equipped on J20 already has the supercruise capability not to mention the WS15.
    5) F22 lacks EOTS and EODAS, which are crucial when facing stealth fighter.
    6) J20 has much larger range.
    The only short comings of J20 I can think of are:
    1) J20 does not have autocannon
    2) J20 does not have the 2D TVC Engine which affect maneuverability. Due to the canard design, maybe J20 does not even need a TVC engine.
    both of them are less important in BVR fighting.

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 11 днів тому +1

      AIM26) could fit inside internal weapon bay while PL-17 doesnt...hihihih

  • @activisteady3451
    @activisteady3451 18 днів тому +7

    That’s Starscream

  • @BlueRam15
    @BlueRam15 13 днів тому +2

    The glaring lack of research by the speaker woke me up from my half-asleep state.

  • @wolfskid15
    @wolfskid15 17 днів тому +5

    The F-22 isn't even the most advanced American stealth fighter. The F-35 while less cool looking and less famous than the F-22 is 10 years newer with more advanced systems. The U.S military also has nearly six times as many F-35s as it does 22s so in a potential conflict between the U.S and China a fight between F-35s and J-20s is a much more likely fight. The AirForce is working on restarting production of F-22s and wants a modernization program but that is a long way.

    • @user-ew5eh2co5p
      @user-ew5eh2co5p 12 днів тому

      Only 29% of F35 is operational, another tax pit.

  • @user-vw8ex6kn6b
    @user-vw8ex6kn6b 18 днів тому +7

    I thought the retired naval officer could give more detailed data, but it seems that I expected too much.The key Gan radar EOTS EODAS is not mentioned, and the latest mass production of J20 is WS15 engine with higher thrust than higher thrust.😂

    • @anthonyk423
      @anthonyk423 15 днів тому +1

      It’s also been reported that the new engine is far from reliable and has had failures with one being at an air show 😂

    • @user-vw8ex6kn6b
      @user-vw8ex6kn6b 15 днів тому +2

      @@anthonyk423 That was ten years ago, and now all technical obstacles have been overcome.😂

  • @DorianMorla
    @DorianMorla 11 днів тому +1

    I worked at Lockheed. I practiced the viper drill bit and sold 600 units.

  • @behere146
    @behere146 17 днів тому +2

    The reality is that the F22 has been discontinued a long time ago, one less when one is broken, and the J20 is being mass-produced. I can understand the American mentality from this comparison.

  • @noneintel2119
    @noneintel2119 18 днів тому +16

    May be he is an INSIDER who knows more than we. One thing I do know F22's max speed is March 2.2 and J20's max speed is march 2.5. Again I got those info from youtube. J20 has greater range to reach. Only way to find out which is better is to have a real fight, airplane to airplane. It seems to me this guy was living in the year 2000 and got no ideas of the latest technology in J20 comparing to 20 years old f22 without any updates.

    • @JeremiahAnunnaki
      @JeremiahAnunnaki 14 днів тому

      Well you don't know as much as you think. The f-22 does get updates. It's getting enough updates with the most recent to strap an f-35a to its back (in a funding sense)

    • @ShaKa-Ri
      @ShaKa-Ri 12 днів тому

      2.5? We’ll see!

  • @user-yy9hk9od9u
    @user-yy9hk9od9u 18 днів тому +4

    It's not even a close comparison.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 17 днів тому

      Yes.
      The odds are in favor of J-20 as it holds the latest technology as per international standards.

  • @hasibulhasan1897
    @hasibulhasan1897 14 днів тому +2

    says an american analyst

  • @Loong199
    @Loong199 12 днів тому +1

    Why people still comparing an 2000s fighter with 2020s fighter...

  • @MassimvsPrimoMeridio
    @MassimvsPrimoMeridio 14 днів тому +9

    Funny how everyone in the internet are seasoned military personnel with tons of combat, and strategic experience and s#*7 but in real life less than 1% of population actually joined the Military 😂😂😂.

  • @bf799
    @bf799 15 днів тому +11

    Oh My God! Are you sure the J-20's maneuverability is mediocre? LOL

    • @ShaKa-Ri
      @ShaKa-Ri 12 днів тому +1

      Yes

    • @edwwong1003
      @edwwong1003 11 днів тому

      Obviously our commentator is outdated

  • @D1KHEAD808
    @D1KHEAD808 17 днів тому +1

    Like a ship displaces water a plane displaces air.
    You just gotta know what to look for.

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 17 днів тому

      noise .... dont forget that

  • @gabedarrett1301
    @gabedarrett1301 16 днів тому +3

    Very general statements were made; little comparison was done. Disappointing...

    • @anthonyk423
      @anthonyk423 15 днів тому

      That’s because one is operational and has been for 20 years and the other is still in testing

  • @TAIWAN_PROVINCE_CHINA
    @TAIWAN_PROVINCE_CHINA 13 днів тому +3

    In military industry there's no patent rights, before accusing others of stealing, it's better for you to keep your drawings in a safer place.

  • @melvinmora5729
    @melvinmora5729 16 днів тому +6

    F-22 was developed decades ago and their pilots are very experienced, us has 180 something fully operational and also the us 6th gen fighter is almost fully operational

    • @jha2866
      @jha2866 15 днів тому +1

      你也许是从外星来的,对地球不太了解

    • @shuaiguo
      @shuaiguo 13 днів тому +1

      But one thing for sure: the J20 production rate is increasing rapidly, while the F22 production line has long been dismantled, gone, done, forever.

    • @NadeemAhmed-nv2br
      @NadeemAhmed-nv2br 13 днів тому +1

      @@shuaiguo So, US 6th gen fighters have already been flown

    • @Loong199
      @Loong199 12 днів тому

      ​@@jha2866你伟大的主席知晓你用UA-cam吗😊

  • @murset3
    @murset3 18 днів тому +9

    So you are speaking at length about the F22 but know very little about the Chinese plane. Does this make sense to you???

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 17 днів тому +3

      even more dumb to repeat a RSC of the f22 the size of the golf ball. if it is.. it wouldn't register on the radar

  • @AlvaroALorite
    @AlvaroALorite 13 днів тому +2

    Jeez...half a million dollar per missile is crazy!

    • @user-cy3ts5xt6c
      @user-cy3ts5xt6c 11 днів тому

      lol and they used 2 to shoot down the so called spy balloon (even more hilarious is that the 1st missile fired, actually missed the balloon) 🤣🤣

    • @AlvaroALorite
      @AlvaroALorite 11 днів тому

      @@user-cy3ts5xt6c add to that the operational costs of deploying that jet in the first place. well spent tax payer money, I guess hahahaha

    • @user-cy3ts5xt6c
      @user-cy3ts5xt6c 11 днів тому

      @@AlvaroALorite the high production and maintenance costs together with outdated tech is probably what contributed to the F22 not being built anymore.

  • @Challenging_bias
    @Challenging_bias 18 днів тому +1

    The sheer number advantage is gonna be the deciding factor.

    • @KC-vx7gj
      @KC-vx7gj 17 днів тому

      The F22 has stopped being produced while J20 is projected to produce over 1000 by 2030

    • @lyft4238
      @lyft4238 17 днів тому

      ​​​​​@@KC-vx7gjlol that's because they are retiring it for the NGADs(spoiler: it won't)
      Anyone else retiring their fifth gen fighters for 6th gen?
      Soo a 6th gen going up against a 5th gen wouldn't be much of a threat now does it.
      Also the US is already looking at 7th gen tech

    • @ShaKa-Ri
      @ShaKa-Ri 12 днів тому

      @@KC-vx7gjYou China is gonna produce a bunch of big, fat aircraft that can be tracked and targeted by fourth generation fighters,of which the west has thousands?😂

  • @obinnaukoha1380
    @obinnaukoha1380 18 днів тому +3

    So the SU-57 is not considered to be a 5th gen stealth fighter?

    • @LSmoney215
      @LSmoney215 18 днів тому

      Eff the su57

    • @nuckerball1259
      @nuckerball1259 18 днів тому

      Its not a stealth fighter thats for sure. If a 5th gen needs to have the attributes of f22, f35, j20. Then no.

    • @user-fs9kc1vo4o
      @user-fs9kc1vo4o 18 днів тому

      @@nuckerball1259 J-35

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock 17 днів тому

      It is the least stealthiest of 5th gen fighters and it's radar isn't that great.

    • @lyft4238
      @lyft4238 17 днів тому

      4.5

  • @CulturalXplorer19
    @CulturalXplorer19 18 днів тому +8

    Wait until he realises the new variants of the J-20 are equipped with the WS-15 engines. These engines have the ability to do super cruise without afterburner, and they are way more powerful.

  • @pyroromancer
    @pyroromancer 12 днів тому

    "....manoveravility is not important... Of"
    The YF23 should have been chosen. Just looking at that thing was inspiring

  • @fredschnerbert1238
    @fredschnerbert1238 18 днів тому +1

    A bit picky maybe
    *Radio waves have wavelengths of 1 m up. The frequency at 1 m is 300 MHz.*
    *Microwaves have wavelengths of 1 mm (millimeter) to 1 m. The frequency at 1 mm is 300 GHz.*
    *Modern RADAR uses microwave, not radio waves*
    *TBMD uses SPY-1B/D*

  • @Redswipe
    @Redswipe 18 днів тому +51

    Seeing those huge canards on a stealth fighter is hilarious

    • @levelazn
      @levelazn 18 днів тому +25

      see american stealth fighters on chinese radar is even funnier

    • @garrettfulks2932
      @garrettfulks2932 18 днів тому +23

      @@levelaznFunny joke just not reality.

    • @user-ii7zr3bj9c
      @user-ii7zr3bj9c 18 днів тому

      Watch out you backyard! Chinese Immigrants joint by other Asian ethnics groups are building their new country inside of America!

    • @Issavibe3
      @Issavibe3 18 днів тому

      Remember when how those canards managed to sneak up on a couple of F-35 over the south china sea ? 😂 now that was hilarious given that the F-35 was supposed to be " undetectable "

    • @DylanFan
      @DylanFan 18 днів тому +3

      they have little affect on stealth in this particular application

  • @Foxtrot672
    @Foxtrot672 18 днів тому +8

    Keep in mind the F-22 is 14 years older than the J-30 and its replacement is already in the works for 2030.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 17 днів тому

      J-20 holds far modern technology than F-22.
      F-22 is being retired, J-20 is not.
      China modifies jets than original ones.
      They did the same with Russian jet copies.
      Chinese J-11, J-15 and J-16 are far more superior than their Russian counterparts.

    • @strangewayfaringstranger
      @strangewayfaringstranger 15 днів тому +1

      Except they fail at making jets.

    • @joseaaronleojeruta2122
      @joseaaronleojeruta2122 15 днів тому +1

      ​@@strangewayfaringstrangerwho?

    • @Mike-bt3ki
      @Mike-bt3ki 13 днів тому

      @@strangewayfaringstranger The Chinese are getting better at it, they've come a long way

    • @youngsoolee1349
      @youngsoolee1349 13 днів тому

      @@Mike-bt3ki Getting better, but not even close to the American level.

  • @J3scribe
    @J3scribe 16 днів тому +1

    China's J20 is really good at flying in formation at airshows.

  • @XiyuYang
    @XiyuYang 8 днів тому +1

    J-20 is better and here is why.
    A reasonable deduction is that J-20 and F-22 are near-peer fighters, J-20 would be better in some aspects, F-22 would be better in some others. However, as of this moment, there are far more operational J-20s (at least 270, still in production) than F-22s (187, not counting the losses over the years, and already out of production for 14 years), and the USAF won't be able to deploy all its F-22s to the Pacific theater, while the PLANAF could focus their J-20s in one region.
    And that is exactly why the US won't risk a direct military conflict with China in the Pacific theater, the best outcome for the US is a pyrrhic victory, one that would definitely cost it the global influence (or whatever left of that) it still possesses right now.

  • @Chzt123
    @Chzt123 18 днів тому +11

    F-22 tells j-20, I should call you mini-me

    • @bioberliner
      @bioberliner 14 днів тому +2

      j20 is much bigger

    • @Chzt123
      @Chzt123 14 днів тому

      @@bioberliner 🙃 referring to mighty power and technology

    • @Zar_Zieg
      @Zar_Zieg 13 днів тому

      I’d call the j-22 Quasimodo but that would be too insulting to him.

  • @jetli740
    @jetli740 18 днів тому +5

    this guy seriously out of date, and still repeat f22 RCS the size of a golf ball, does he have the evidence?

  • @redjacc7581
    @redjacc7581 12 днів тому +1

    Attack helicopters and CAS are redundant in a near peer confrontation, unless you accept huge casualties.

  • @redfirekla
    @redfirekla 10 днів тому

    The F-22 is so advanced with a radar corss section of a honey bee we should make new more modern versions of it, at least a 1000 units.

  • @harshitsingh3915
    @harshitsingh3915 18 днів тому +3

    Please put metric figures on screen. The world uses metric, not Imperial.

  • @getblacked1351
    @getblacked1351 17 днів тому +2

    That twin engine is screaming "im not stealthy" 😂 add when it use afterburners

  • @sodazman
    @sodazman 18 днів тому +19

    The goal of China isn't to invade other countries, but primarily to ensure its own safety. If you look at the history of China, you'll find that they don't invade other countries. People talk about Taiwan but even the US acknowledges that Taiwan is a part of China.
    The US doesn't have the capabilities to defeat China in a head to head should it happen, despite having superior hardware at this point. What the US really should be worrying about isn't having bigger guns, but the economy and the wellbeing of its people. Being $35 trillion in debt means time is running out. The interest alone is in excess of $800 billion a year.

    • @Jewdah18
      @Jewdah18 18 днів тому +5

      This is super disingenuous. For much of modern history China was to poor/weak to have an expeditionary force and was being conquered/controlled by Japan and Western Powers. As they become richer, stronger, and nationalistic, its not clear what they'll want to do.
      The U.S. doesn't recognize Taiwan for the sake of stability in that region but it is the main provider of arms to Taiwan. Japan and the U.S. will absolutely support Taiwan over China because Taiwan has TSMC.
      Technically no nuclear powers have the ability to defeat each other given how destructive nukes are but there is no evidence that China has the capabilities to defeat a U.S. led alliance (Japan, South Korea, Philippines and others) that uses all of the tech in the U.S.'s arsenal.
      The entire world's economy rests on the U.S. navy ensuring that international waters stay international to ensuring safe shipping lanes for trade. Also military innovation and production helps the economy.
      The US debt is atrocious but most of it is owned internally and most of the foreign debt is owned by allies. With the U.S. still being the reserve currency of the world and the strongest country, it is not so clear that time is running out.
      Meanwhile pay no attention to China's population pyramid which is definitely not a ticking time bomb.

    • @funafei5225
      @funafei5225 18 днів тому +4

      So what you are trying to selling is that China should remain poor/weak, so it's clear that a poor/weak China can not do anything to others, but the others can do anything to China.
      Such a gangster logic.

    • @Jewdah18
      @Jewdah18 18 днів тому +3

      @@funafei5225No. I'm not saying what should happen, I'm just giving the facts of what has happened and what that means going forward.

    • @sodazman
      @sodazman 17 днів тому +2

      @@Jewdah18 It really isn't the job of the US interfere with other countries through the weapons trade. It's done so for the past few decades extensively in the middle East, South America, Cuba, USSR, Thailand and now Taiwan, Ukraine and Palestine. The result is millions of unnecessary deaths (Close to 5 million deaths post 9/11). Some countries like Laos are still littered with millions of bombs left by the US decades ago. The only reason the US is interfering is for its own interests. When it was convenient, the US actually funded China to fight against Japan.
      China was actually one of the wealthiest countries in the 18th century and was neither poor nor weak - accounting for up to 30% of the world's GDP. They have also surpassed the US in GDP parity by 30% today and removed its entire population from poverty.
      I frequently travel to both the US and China for business and I can tell you from my own experience that the US is decades behind in terms of development. Look at the rail infrastructure and it's like the US is living in the stone ages. I'm from Australia but I lived in NYC in the Jersey area for 5 years of my life (I studied in NYU) and every time I go back I see so much more poverty. The place where I used to rent is now surrounded by tents with homeless people. Meanwhile the government is shipping 200 billion dollars worth of weapons to Ukraine. I don't think this is the right direction.

    • @Jewdah18
      @Jewdah18 17 днів тому +1

      @@sodazman My point about weapons was in response to your assertion that the U.S. should focus solely on the economy. The U.S.’s complicated history in sharing weapons doesn’t change the fact that developing and manufacturing weapons tremendously helps the U.S. economy. Especially if those weapons contribute to U.S. maritime supremacy which guarantees safe shipping lanes and lower global trade prices.
      I also think that it is easy to be cynical about the U.S. only interfering for its own interests. Obviously, it is in American interests for Ukraine to remain sovereign and weaken Russia, but the people of Ukraine still deserve freedom. As bad as Iraq was, the U.S. invested a ton of money in trying to create a democracy (which also was in America’s interest). The will to do the right thing can be there even if the reality doesn’t allow that to happen.
      China throughout history has been one of the wealthiest/strongest empires. But starting in the 19th century till now there have been many foreign countries that have imposed their will on China. Those events still influence how China acts today. While China is way less impoverished than they were 30 years ago, China’s current GDP per capita is ~$12.7k whereas the U.S.’s is $76.3k.
      I agree that the U.S.’s infrastructure is bad and needs massive investment but looking at the rail system is not fair. Most Americans would rather drive or fly and have never cared about having trains.
      Poverty in the U.S. is an embarrassment, but it’s wrong to think that it is should stop aid to Ukraine. Many of the weapons that the U.S. gives Ukraine are either prebuilt and/or about to expire. I guess a homeless person would be less homeless in an Abrams tank, but I don’t think that’s a good idea.

  • @dingmingzou9866
    @dingmingzou9866 17 днів тому +1

    Next one: NGAD vs J20

    • @Bangy
      @Bangy 10 днів тому

      Same story as, B21, AIM260, and LGM30 replacements.
      A whole lotta hype, a whole lotta delays, not a whole lotta plane.

  • @tuffgong5162
    @tuffgong5162 15 днів тому +1

    We don’t know much about the J-20… Proceeds to tell us everything about the J-20 including video😂

  • @user-wx2el5jy2t
    @user-wx2el5jy2t 18 днів тому +7

    F-22 is better

    • @MMA-gb6to
      @MMA-gb6to 18 днів тому

      my grandma is better than F-22

    • @christopherdrew6997
      @christopherdrew6997 18 днів тому +6

      @@MMA-gb6towow good come back LOL

    • @user-wx2el5jy2t
      @user-wx2el5jy2t 18 днів тому

      @@MMA-gb6to it depends on what

    • @garrettfulks2932
      @garrettfulks2932 18 днів тому

      ⁠@@MMA-gb6to😂😂😂😂😂😂such a strong comeback. “My Grandma is better than the F22, “ how many social credit points did you get?

    • @user-hk1um4ig7p
      @user-hk1um4ig7p 18 днів тому

      @@garrettfulks2932 As I understand it, the points earned should be lower than shooting down a balloon with an F22. But not by much. Go for it, man!😂😂

  • @akka2011hk
    @akka2011hk 17 днів тому +4

    This guy analysis is meant for kintergarden audiences who know nothing about the J20 and F22A. First of all the new J20B w WS15 engines w higher thrust to weight ratio and overall thrust than the PW119. WS10C engine can allow the J20A to supercruise at M1.5 and the new WS15 can allow the J20B to supercruise at M1.8. Besides the guy didn't mention the F22A doesn't helmet mounted sight, can't do network warfare, doesn't have ETOS and Long range infra red detection capabilities..... etc which the J20 have crucial in combat against stealth aircrafts. J20 radar w much more advance T/R modules than the APG77 used by the F22A hence has longer detection range and better anti-jamming capabilities. Besides the PL15 has 50% more range than the AIM120D which means the J20A/B can detect and shoot down the F22A long before the raptor can detect and fire upon the J20, The USAF is betting on NGAD against the J20 and that tells U which is better. LMAO!!!

  • @AZ-hj8ym
    @AZ-hj8ym 14 днів тому +1

    F22 are retiring while J20 are deploying 10:11 and upgraded. That says enough.

  • @HadeerAnnie
    @HadeerAnnie 18 днів тому

    These materials are top-notch.

  • @Mel-Mou
    @Mel-Mou 18 днів тому +4

    French Rafale 🇫🇷 >>>>>

  • @MoCan2
    @MoCan2 17 днів тому +2

    This guy gives info what can be easily googled

  • @user-cy3ts5xt6c
    @user-cy3ts5xt6c 11 днів тому +2

    lol western subjective bias against the J20 - by your own admission, you said you don't know much about the J20 and it's all your own guestimates, so how can you fairly compare without knowing all the technical specs of both aircraft??

  • @christiangarcia5348
    @christiangarcia5348 18 днів тому +2

    0:54 Bro is talking out his butt. Air superiority fights job is not to knock out air defenses, its solely to destroy enemy fighters and to deny the enemy the ability to use the sky. An f22 will never have the job of attacking a sam site. Thats for multirole, ground attack, and electronic warfare aircraft to do.

  • @geulssae
    @geulssae 18 днів тому +25

    We have a saying in Korea: "F-22 is for fighting aliens"
    F-22 >>>> J-20

    • @user-ii7zr3bj9c
      @user-ii7zr3bj9c 18 днів тому

      Watch out! Chinese and other Asian ethnics groups are building their new country inside of America!

    • @Booz2020
      @Booz2020 18 днів тому +2

      Slava TSMC 🇹🇼 Heroyam TAIWANese 🦾

    • @peianghe2466
      @peianghe2466 18 днів тому +17

      We have a saying in china as well: Korea is No.1 country in the universe...

    • @ragnarokws2670
      @ragnarokws2670 18 днів тому

      Korea is universal thief 😂

    • @geulssae
      @geulssae 18 днів тому +3

      @@peianghe2466 just brush your teeth first, ok?

  • @Striker_USA
    @Striker_USA 11 днів тому

    Bro wheres the SU 57, I get it I hate the enemy but the SU 57 is terrifying unlike the wood built J20s.

  • @kornfed81
    @kornfed81 18 днів тому +8

    I'd like to know why only 29% of our F35s are operational.

    • @MS-wz9jm
      @MS-wz9jm 18 днів тому +1

      Thats not important, what's important is they look cool so we can claim how amazing they are, doesnt matter that they dont work most of the time 🤣

    • @lyft4238
      @lyft4238 17 днів тому +1

      "Appear Weak when Strong"

    • @user-cy3ts5xt6c
      @user-cy3ts5xt6c 11 днів тому

      bec they're so unreliable - prone to many accidents and crashes

  • @corey9200
    @corey9200 18 днів тому +29

    I'm gonna give you a hint, the one that's better isn't a stolen copy of the other loool

    • @richardmackenzie1878
      @richardmackenzie1878 18 днів тому

      Americans think everything China has is stolen, even as the Chinese out perform you guys in so many different technologies. It's gonna be a sad day when you realize how behind you are.

    • @levelazn
      @levelazn 17 днів тому +1

      the one thats better doesn't have a budget of 1 trillion

    • @Boom-eo8ht
      @Boom-eo8ht 17 днів тому +3

      @@levelaznhow is that better? 🤣

    • @raydeemed
      @raydeemed 17 днів тому

      ​@@levelazn you saw the senate hearing were they said that a small bag probably 1 pound of nuts and bolts used in the so called superior one cost $8000😂😂😂😂 literally the same bag with exact contents cost less than $20😂😂

    • @darkboard5556
      @darkboard5556 17 днів тому

      ​@@Boom-eo8ht no corruption

  • @theflyer1
    @theflyer1 17 днів тому

    Art Of War - 'Never underestimate your enemy'.

    • @tedwong7037
      @tedwong7037 12 днів тому

      that's chinese philosophy, american art of war is we r no. 1

  • @ronaldwang9838
    @ronaldwang9838 16 днів тому +3

    The F-22 lags far behind the J-20 in all technical capabilities, such as Stealth(J-20 has used next generation lefthanded metamaterial stealth material), Maneuverability(WS-15 engine performance data is ahead of F-119 engine), Supercruise(1.8 Mach super cruise speed, Maximum speed 2.8 Mach, even 2.55 Mach only with WS-10C engines), Advanced avionics, including low-probability-of-intercept radar (LPIR)(latecomer advantage with third generation semiconductor gallium nitride technology), Networked data fusion, enabling situation awareness on the battlefield(Latecomer advantage, Radar, IRST, EOTS, EORD). And air-to-air missile dual pulse solid fuel engine technology, the PL-15 has a far greater range than that of the AIM-120D.
    The core processor of the F-22 uses a 500nm technology node PowerPC 603 chip, while the core processor of the F-35 uses a 90nm technology node PowerPC 7448 chip. The core processor of the J-20 is reportedly based on a 28-40nm process chip. The first GaN radar prototype for the U.S. military produced by Raytheon was first installed and tested on April 29, 2021. Therefore, both the F-22's APG-77 radar and the F-35's APG-81 radar are second-generation semiconductor GaAs technology radars. The APG-77 has 1956 T/R modules with a peak power of 20 kW, while the APG-81 has 1676 T/R modules with a peak power expected to be lower than 20 kW (due to second-generation GaAs technology). The J-20's KLJ-5 radar has approximately 2200 receive/transmit T/R modules, with a power output of around 100 kW as reported by the State media CCTV, which can only be achieved by third-generation semiconductor GaN technology power devices. This implies that under equivalent other conditions, the detection range of the J-20 radar could be 50% greater than that of the F-22 and F-35 radars. Consequently, the original plan of the U.S. military to start upgrading the core processors TR-3 and radar APG-85 for the F-35A Block 4 Lot 15-17, which was accelerated to 2023, has now been postponed again, and it is uncertain when the upgrade will enter service.
    According to CCTV data, the fuel consumption rate of the turbofan WS-15 without afterburner is 0.67 kg/daN/h, and the fuel consumption rate with afterburner is 1.98 kg/daN/h. The fuel consumption rate of the turbofan WS-10C without afterburner is 0.85 kg/daN/h, and the fuel consumption rate with afterburner is 2.2 kg/daN/h. The fuel consumption of the F119 without afterburner is 0.9 kg/daN/h, and with afterburner on it is 2.4 kg/daN/h.

  • @4esttube
    @4esttube 18 днів тому +3

    Considering the F-22 struggled again a Chinese balloon, I wouldn't underestimate the J-20

    • @nickhanssenmediagroup
      @nickhanssenmediagroup 18 днів тому

      How did it struggle?

    • @ianduffy5176
      @ianduffy5176 18 днів тому

      Lol it didn't struggle what are you talking about, shill?

    • @user-cy3ts5xt6c
      @user-cy3ts5xt6c 11 днів тому

      @@ianduffy5176 the 1st missile fired totally missed the balloon, numbnuts 🤣🤣; the pilot had to get closer to the balloon to fire the 2nd missile. 😂😂

    • @Alexander-vo4gv
      @Alexander-vo4gv 19 годин тому

      @@ianduffy5176 they shot 2 missiles, the first one missed lmao

  • @neilnacorda8846
    @neilnacorda8846 16 днів тому +1

    im not even sure why this two are in the same sentence. just for a sake of making an article, something to talk about?

  • @s-digits5242
    @s-digits5242 18 днів тому +1

    The one from the US is the best ... said the US Navy Veteran.

  • @willpaddack2798
    @willpaddack2798 18 днів тому +3

    The j20s rcs is alot higher compared to the raptor. The chinese h20 bomber isn't much better. India radars were able to track the j20

    • @funafei5225
      @funafei5225 18 днів тому

      WOW 😲
      That's incredible!

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock 17 днів тому +1

      Too bad you lack the knowledge to know Lunenburg lenses exist. Any stealth fighter can be detected

    • @willpaddack2798
      @willpaddack2798 17 днів тому

      @@_Chad_ThunderCock you know there is a difference between detect and track wumao

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock 17 днів тому

      @@willpaddack2798 Itd be embarassing for the Indians if they weren't able to track a stealth jet that had it's Lunenburg lenses on

    • @willpaddack2798
      @willpaddack2798 17 днів тому

      @@_Chad_ThunderCock you have no idea what your talking about 😂

  • @dineshkumar-ug2kt
    @dineshkumar-ug2kt 18 днів тому +3

    Original vs Copy

  • @tawandaJerry
    @tawandaJerry 11 днів тому

    J 20 hasn’t seen any combat while F22 is being phased out for being outdated and too expensive to update making way for the NGAD

  • @LawJolla
    @LawJolla 11 днів тому +1

    Poor explanation. All stealth fighters can be located by low band radar arrays. But they are hard to get a weapon’s grade lock.

  • @raihanrudro1823
    @raihanrudro1823 18 днів тому +6

    We have to admit that, china is doing very well considering how late they have started working on these stealth fighter jets. Russia and US is the first runners and china is the latecomer but growing very fast.

    • @TrekCannon
      @TrekCannon 18 днів тому +4

      They bootleg very well😂

    • @davedice4688
      @davedice4688 18 днів тому +2

      Hahahahahahaha no. They’re still so far behind it’s almost funny.

    • @JigilJigil
      @JigilJigil 18 днів тому

      F-22 is 30 years old and the cheap knockoff J-20 came in existence 20 years later, and the best part is China is not even able to match US 30 years old US military technology, that's how far behind they are.

    • @rohinanand540
      @rohinanand540 18 днів тому +3

      ​@@davedice4688dum dum tell me why usa hasn't won a war since ww2 ?
      y'all are better at small ops like extraction or capture ... but idk there's some flaw there that you haven't won an actual war since ww2 ... that too in ww2 battle of stalingrad changes the course ... so stop overestimating .... if there were no nukes Russia is practically undefeatable ... well nukes then so mutual destruction... why haven't us of a has not won a war

    • @tmclaug90
      @tmclaug90 18 днів тому

      ​@@rohinanand540the US beat Iraq twice. They had a large army. Technically they beat the Soviets too in the Cold War.

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 18 днів тому +4

    The actual matchup would surprise you. F22s were designed in the 90s with 90s era computers and sensors. They are out of production and are steadily being retired meaning their numbers will dwindle while J20s are still being built and improved upon.
    The latest version of the J20 has 360 degree infrared sensors that can passively detect other stealth fighters without even having to turn their radars on. Its the same tech used in the F35 which has beaten F22s using just that method.
    J20s also have a modern datalink which allows it to spot targets for each other and other PLA fighters, F22s have to rely on their own radars to engage targets meaning they can't remain radar silent when attacking.
    Finally, the age of the airframes also makes a massive difference. Stealth coatings age just like anything else. Worn stealth coatings from 2 decades of use are significantly less stealthy than something fresh out of the factory. Not to mention the J20 was designed using much more modern stealth coatings after seeing the headaches the F22 causes when it comes to maintaining said stealth coating.

    • @nuckerball1259
      @nuckerball1259 18 днів тому +1

      Well basically if the j20s infrared search can pick up and achieve lock on an f22 before the f22 can lock and launch on it, then yes. Impossible to say for sure because we don't know the real stats of these vehicles. They are very different in design philosophy, with j20 being more comparable to the f35.

  • @Christmas12
    @Christmas12 День тому

    But the J-20 does supercruise contrary to how it is portrayed here, and it is equipped with more modern sensor array equipment more in line with the F35, moreover there are more operational J-20s and it is currently in production so there are even more on the way, the F22 might be more be a be slightly better machine but that difference probably won't count for very much

  • @travisfubu9053
    @travisfubu9053 10 днів тому +1

    We do not know much abotu china's but we have determined that ours is better because our government said so
    Trust me bro I am a defense editor

  • @GO6iX4OUR
    @GO6iX4OUR 18 днів тому +3

    F-22A

  • @cody1964
    @cody1964 18 днів тому +6

    these kinds of videos always attract the chinese bots lol
    no one should lose sleep over China's J20

    • @Chup-os2uf
      @Chup-os2uf 18 днів тому

      Americunt bots are dog talking non stop about Chinese stealth jets!! 😂😂

    • @abhinavd_lol
      @abhinavd_lol 16 днів тому

      Yup the comments are full of em. One bot even commented that China hasn't invaded anybody. They have invaded India, Bhutan, Nepal multiple times.

    • @anthonyk423
      @anthonyk423 15 днів тому

      Besides China. Easy to steal the blueprints from other countries but a lot harder to build them espically when China can’t make advanced chips on their own. That’s the real reason Xi wants to invade Taiwan for its advanced chip making tech and they’d have blueprints at just about every advanced chip.

  • @qianzhou5340
    @qianzhou5340 17 днів тому +1

    F22 is i386 in the last century and stops production. Where is the comparison?

  • @jasonyau326
    @jasonyau326 День тому

    F22 have not been produced in almost a decade while China is just ramping up production of the J20. There were less than 200 F22 produced due to high costs. China just has to make more Jets to try to overwhelm their adversaries. Plus the issue is not just how much the jets costs but how much it costs to keep them flying.

  • @simchak8225
    @simchak8225 18 днів тому +4

    First

  • @ideajin20sh
    @ideajin20sh 8 днів тому

    The comparation itself evidences FEAR

  • @MAC_GAINZ
    @MAC_GAINZ 18 днів тому +1

    Depends on the PILOT! 🙄🙄

  • @Dats_Mark
    @Dats_Mark 18 днів тому +3

    too bad the F-22 was so expensive that they scrapped most of the orders for hundreds of them and redirected into variations of the F-35

    • @davedice4688
      @davedice4688 18 днів тому +1

      That’s wasn’t why they scrapped the remainders

    • @Zakna
      @Zakna 18 днів тому +2

      nope. Soviet collapses so the US had no reason to make F22s anymore.

    • @davedice4688
      @davedice4688 17 днів тому +1

      @@Zakna such a simple and correct answer. And so easy to find. You’d wonder why so many have so much trouble finding it…

  • @KevsEpisode
    @KevsEpisode 18 днів тому +3

    Fun fact about J20. In the west China Sea in year 2022, Philippines Air radar defense detected this aircraft in 180 nautical miles in bajudimasinlok island territory of the Philippines. And it was intercept by the Philippines Air Force, by a 4th generation fighter jet which is FA-50. And you know what's more funny our aireal radar defense was bough in the Japan way back in year 90's, and they proclaiming that this is a 5th generation stealth fighter jet even the pilot of the FA-50 have a picture of the jet while intercepting it very stealthy good job China. 😂😂😂

    • @domokun845
      @domokun845 18 днів тому +1

      Google Luneburg lens, please.

    • @raptors9779
      @raptors9779 18 днів тому +2

      Fun fact, Philippines airforce don’t have any F16 at this moment. Philippines is in the process of financing them but do not have them yet. My guy is making up stories in his mind to beat China 😂

    • @KevsEpisode
      @KevsEpisode 18 днів тому

      @@raptors9779 sorry it was FA-50 not F-16 and we bought it from South Korea

    • @Wvk5zc
      @Wvk5zc 18 днів тому

      Pinoy loves to make up stories and brag while infact they have nothing to be proud of.

    • @aburetik4866
      @aburetik4866 17 днів тому +1

      and 15 minutes later, your mom waked u up for breakfast

  • @kk66
    @kk66 14 днів тому

    How could you lead to that conclusion with all those comparisons?

  • @ddong9643
    @ddong9643 15 днів тому +1

    A design of fighter jet with canard stolen from the one without it. Lmao😂

  • @knowingyourmind
    @knowingyourmind 18 днів тому +1

    462s. Them's my boys (and girls). 46270, back from 78 to 89.

  • @GGY-yh6li
    @GGY-yh6li 12 днів тому +1

    Outdated data, subjective opinion, 10 minutes wasted...
    You demonstrate your fear when belittle your opponent

  • @RangKlos
    @RangKlos 13 днів тому +1

    Epitome of low quality UA-cam content

  • @robertotomas
    @robertotomas День тому

    I totally can appreciate all that this presentation indicated, but I have to say that these two fighters will never face each other. In the exceptional case that they were to face each other, both sides would be using lasers to remove all air engagement from the area

  • @tashiyann3262
    @tashiyann3262 18 днів тому +1

    I know that both had great capability but the cost would be so much higher to the United States in war and China had a much cheaper and faster benefit.

  • @sergiobowers6930
    @sergiobowers6930 18 днів тому

    Surely both countries and others have weapons none of us know about.

  • @kibo_nbgd
    @kibo_nbgd 11 днів тому

    Raptor needs upgrades. A really impressive jet, which appeared at the wrong time! I would rather say that the F-35 can be compared with the J-20

  • @tashiyann3262
    @tashiyann3262 18 днів тому +1

    I know that both had great capability but the cost would be so much higher to the United States in war and China had a much cheaper and faster benefit overall without counting china tech