Analysis has a hard time. because there is no informations . But one thing is clear, it carrys a PLAA numbers plate, therefore is a not a prototype on but a production plane.
J-36 is a 6th Generation Stealth Fighter Bomber J-50 is a 6th Generation Stealth Fighter Both are at Prototype stage.. J-36 has three engines . it's still a question mark what the third engine is for..but definitely not because their engines are weak .the third engine serves a purpose... It's the first time China design Trijet configuration..they don't do it for no reasons..
@@calvinblue894 three engines due to the fact that two wouldn't have the horsepower to move this thing. Now it's a couple of tons heavier 6 th gen my arse.
NGAD has been long cancelled due to lack of Supersonic speed, low altitude capability and fly without wingman drone. Its easy to search why its been cancelled.
This is a replica of an American aircraft because it has wings, just like the US copied muskets and artillery invented in China because American artillery still has barrels.
It is a commonly known fact that China steals technology. It is faster and cheaper than developing your own. That said, there are doubtless excellent engineers in China doing innovative research and development. Both can be true at once. Your attempt at a joke, however, just reveals your lack of confidence and is pathetic. Equally pathetic is having to go back a thousand years to single out a Chinese invention to highlight--surely you can showcase numerous more recent technological inventions. Next, we will hear you sing the praises of a water clock. LOL
Joseph Needham a British scientist/scholar researched and wrote several volumes on things Chinese invented. the readers were shocked, then the propaganda began.
Not really, if you go by the theory that China invented a time travelling machine and went 5 years into the future and copied this US stealth technology. But then you have to figure out whose time travelling capabilities did China copy….that my friend is the American exceptionalism paradox for American exceptionalist to figure out
@@sniffybear2500Aiyyo Saar, you don’t understand, no? China, they copy everything, even Indian time-travel technology! They go to 2040, steal American fighter blueprints, but what happened? They couldn’t even touch Indian fighter technology! Why? Because Indian technology is too advanced, Saar. Also, we Indians, very trusting people, yes, but only one time, ok? Second time, we catch you red-handed! After all, Saar, we are from very ancient culture-5000 years of jugaad and intelligence. Who else can do IT support for the whole world and still invent time travel, ah? You tell me!
Made it? Does it properly work is another question, can’t even make your own jet turbines. Relying most on Russia and all of a sudden this? It’s Questionable.
@@tano5352 yes, every thing made in China is CGI and ppt. Nothing is true. China's space station is unreal, high speed railway is not true, 5G network or even 5.5G is not true, quantum satellite is not true, everything related to high-tech is China is not true..... Good.... Happy to know that u believe the above.
Just because you call it a thing, doesn't make it that thing. They bloody thing has 3 engines because they can't generate the thrust from 2, not because it's "the future."
Nice video and presentation. If I understand this right, it’s vertical stabilizer(s) is replaced by drag steering, (skid steering), a kind of clap ailerons. In a right turn only the right clap open up, one up one down, and hence drag spin the plane in a clock wise turn, as the stealth bomber do. At the same time the left clamp stay closed and level. Normally only one clamp operate in a turn. Why do the model in this video let the left and right clamps configured to open in a forward flight?
Thank you for your detailed observation! You're correct in noting the drag-based control approach. This method seen in advanced stealth designs like the B-2 Spirit, reduces radar cross-section by eliminating traditional vertical stabilizers. The use of clamshell-style drag rudders allows precise yaw control without compromising stealth characteristics. Regarding the dual clamp operation in forward flight, it could be a configuration to test symmetrical drag effects, potentially for stability or to simulate specific aerodynamic conditions. In operational settings, asymmetrical deployment is typically preferred for directional control, as you mentioned. Differential thrust, as @ZweiZwolf highlighted, is another critical factor, especially in stealth platforms, for fine-tuning directional adjustments. Together, these systems provide agility while maintaining low observability.
You may be right about the symmetrical drag test explanation. However with together landing gears down, I think the drag on both clamps complementing the gear for one goal, a combined drag to stress the engine under test, at 50% or higher thrust. Also set up to determine a low speed stall speed limit. If so it is a safer plan to use in case the wing do enter a stall, the pilot can close all clamp flaps to recover the thrust sooner than the time it takes the engine to rev up from 1/3 thrust or so. Near stall speed it is easier for the camera crew to capture its flight images.
We should not forget that, J-31 prototype in its development stage eventually became J-35. This unnamed bomber may be China's H-20. As its development continues, new technologies such as hypersonic flight and air superiority capabilities can be added turning it into H-21.😅
need further details about airplant, if it equiped with ramjet (only in theory), it might be a power platform, stealth or not, when it fast enought, who cares ?
of course you care. You don't want to just keep running away from missiles from all direction. You also want the element of surprise, not a bunch of missiles ahead waiting for you. Stealth is a lot more important.
And please do tell which aspect of the 5th. Generation fighter jet of china is not refined enough to qualify them to make the jump to 6th. Generation ?
People can cry about China copying all they want. But in the end, if it's an improvement to what China has, then they became that much more capable. Copying or not.
That is a lot of electrical power being produce on the J36..... China probably going to remove the third jet an add a gas tank or add a smaller electrical turbine to power a solid state laser or rail gun.
USA is worrying now. Being a superpower, one must got impressive air dominance. Things are changing to china's side very rapidly. USA is the loser obviously but it is good that USA will not be involved in war every where every year 😅😅
Let me tell the American experts that I heard the supersonic explosion in October 1, 2024 in my Chinese hometown. They have test flights long before 12/26/2024.
These are a lot of assertions. I'm not saying they are false, but it would have helped to explain their reasoning. For example, what makes you think it uses variable cycle engines? Why do you think it is a command platform? There is nothing wrong in speculation, but I would have preferred to hear arguments in defense of these claims. The tone of the video is quite vague. We don't know a lot at this point, but admitting we don't know would be better than vagueness and unsupported statements.
Ja, drei Triebwerke sind in der Luftfahrt tatsächlich selten. Historisch gesehen gab es Flugzeuge wie die McDonnell Douglas DC-10, die Lockheed L-1011 TriStar und die Dassault Falcon 7X, die mit drei Triebwerken ausgestattet waren. Diese Konfiguration wurde oft gewählt, um eine Balance zwischen Leistung, Reichweite und Sicherheit zu bieten. Heutzutage dominieren zweistrahlige und vierstrahlige Designs, da moderne Triebwerke deutlich zuverlässiger und effizienter geworden sind.
When it comes face to face with the F 22, then see who wins. America has the best fighter jets. Should arrange a show down and let the world know who is better.
Also it depends on the pilots too. Britain has the best pilots and Israel too. The Chinese should improve on their pilots skills. Unless there is a show down nobody knows who is better. The russian su 35 also got show down in Ukraine. So pilot skills is also important.
Вы сначала постройте самолёт на такую скорость, у вас может быть и 50 мах, толку от того, вы всё копируете, привет из Киева, и как там наш Ляонин, и его копии?😂
@@vinterutab2822 Вы все технологии воруете, или копируете, вам никогда не обогнать США, весь рынок сбыта вашего дешевого хлама идёт в Европу и США, вы не высокотехнологическая держава, все технологии в США И Европе, вы зависите от них, как рынок сбыта, и от доллара сша!
It's designed for very fast supersonic up to mach4 ... and with lots of armaments can serve as the deep penetration plane even to near space . Being with tails means it is designed to fly very fast . Yes, can function as a bomber and deep penetration plane.
@@bixudiwon6363 a plane can either be a fighter or bomber OR BOTH as in this case. But my guess is it is more of a new plane that is able to reach near space which will give it longer range , very high supersonic , lots more of ammo, long range and acts as forward AWAC detecting all including stealth. That is my opinion... no one really knows
I'll say the more commonly known US delta wing fighter are the F-106s, they are developed from 102, have less built, but were better known then 102, because they were used as back drop for both F-4 and F-15...
Chinese fighter jet pilots would engage in confrontational maneuvers with their US counterparts every once in a while in real life standoffs over West Pacific, so at least they've got some good training, thanks to the US. They lack the kind of operational experience that the Russians have, but I think they are much more professional than most other air forces around the world. Underestimate them at your own risk
Three engines on the J-36 is a lot of weight for an aircraft. That will be a lot of mass to turn with those little flapperons. With China’s definition of a 6th gen fighter including the concept of thrust vectoring and ultra maneuvering I would bet they’re really going for a new thrust vectoring engine. This thing would certainly need an engine like that. With that in mind, I bet this is going to be one seriously maintenance intensive aircraft. Logistics will probably also be a challenge. In speaking of which does anyone have an idea how well China’s maintenance practices are for their advanced fighters? Do they use primarily contractors? If so with their large quantity of J-20s, this thing, j-35, drones, and their new bombers. I’ll be interested to see if they’re able to keep up maintenance during conflict
I can tell you for sure that it is not possible, because in 2023, China's manufacturing output will only account for 35% of the world's total, and we hope to increase it to 45% by 2030.
It's not a dogfighter, it's a supersonic carrier interceptor. Fast and stealthy from the front, with a large, heavy munitions loadout to strike from far beyond visual range. China's military is all state, no contractors.
China is not like the United States, where the manufacturing industry is hollowed out, so the maintenance cost is no more than half of that of the United States. Of course, the same is true for purchasing aircraft. This way you can understand that the hollowing out of the US manufacturing industry and the large number of talents going to the financial, legal and other service industries are definitely strategic mistakes, and this situation is irreversible. In this competition, the United States is doomed to lose!
Your point about the potential weight challenges of the J-36 with three engines is interesting. China's focus on incorporating advanced thrust-vectoring engines aligns with their stated goals for sixth-generation capabilities, including ultra-maneuverability & advanced electronic warfare systems. Regarding maintenance, China's rapid advancements in aerospace technology suggest significant investment in logistics and support infrastructure. While there isn’t much publicly available data on their maintenance practices, it's worth noting that their military-industrial complex has increasingly integrated domestic contractors & automated systems to manage their growing fleet, including the J-20, J-35, and newer platforms. It will indeed be interesting to see how these systems perform & are sustained during prolonged operations or conflict scenarios.
@VIVIANLIU0310 Ohh... poor baby can't come up with anything so resorts to insults. China hasn't been able to match the F-22 let alone the F-35, they've had all sorts of issues with their turbines (the J-20 is struggling), & you think they're going to leap ahead with an aircraft the size of a block of flats that needs 3 engines to fly? Cool story, bro. 🤡
Experts? And analysis with no information? It is a plane oh opps, actually planes, two of, look like diamond 💎 shape, no yellow paint like the display in the recent Zhuhai show, is this a production model, testing model, demo model. Can't tell you anything more. I am an expert, such a joke
Lol keep thinking that way and you might get a brutal wake up call when you see one in your media and it will probably tge last thing you will ever see if a conflict breaks out...
Does it properly work is another question, can’t even make your own jet turbines. Relying mostly on Russia built turbines and all of a sudden this? It’s Questionable.
They've been building their own jet turbines for years now, they only relied on Russian imports initially because it was cheaper and allowed their fighter jets to be operational sooner. You are so behind in information. They have also built actually working hypersonic ICBMs and other advanced missiles, all of which depend on super advanced engine designs, all of which the US/NATO doesn't have, so there is no reason to believe that somehow China doesn't have the engineering or industrial capacity to build the engines proper to a 6th generation platform... Or whatever they intend to do with "J-36"
J20's maiden flight was like only 12 years ago. I'm guessing they already started at that time the design of this new jet. So they prolly cooking something else already at this point.
China need to show something which selected so as to warn some countries better keep safe distance, they won't show you their most advanced and confidential technology
Three engines, who's engines? Russian's or their own? With Russian it might work they make a good dependable engine as for the Chines engines if it is theirs, they needed three to get it off the ground. They haven't advanced their jet tech as far as the Russians and the US and reverse engineering only goes so far.
China's jet engines, particularly those of the j35 and j20 are much better than the engine of the f35. The j20 does not use afterburners to perform supercruise whereas the f35 can not perform supercruise without using an afterburner
![Как работает Спутниковый Интернет? Разбираем работу Starlink [Branch Education на русском]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RAOAbqRiN4A/mqdefault.jpg)
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Analysis has a hard time. because there is no informations . But one thing is clear, it carrys a PLAA numbers plate, therefore is a not a prototype on but a production plane.
😮
And it's 36011, meaning test plane is the 11th unit in production😔
@@mohdsharkawiluabdullah2256 It should be first prototype of the 2nd iteration.
why that emo？😢
@@freeworld88888 no, it is still prototype, not in production phase
J-36 is a 6th Generation Stealth Fighter Bomber
J-50 is a 6th Generation Stealth Fighter
Both are at Prototype stage..
J-36 has three engines . it's still a question mark what the third engine is for..but definitely not because their engines are weak .the third engine serves a purpose...
It's the first time China design Trijet configuration..they don't do it for no reasons..
@@calvinblue894 three engines due to the fact that two wouldn't have the horsepower to move this thing. Now it's a couple of tons heavier 6 th gen my arse.
@Jonasbarbury If you think the engine is not enough power..why first flight?
That 3 engines due to lack of power is the DUMBEST NARRATIVE EVER..
無尾翼+3發動機，按中國往例編號36011代表已生產11架，其餘就讓美西方慢慢猜吧！
J36 is a next gen platform designed to maximize the advantage of PL17 & YJ12 missiles. Perfect for dominating air and sea past the 2nd island chain.
Now that show China 🇨🇳 is not copycat of the United States 🇺🇲 this model is elite into the future of air power
Our NGAD flew years ago lol.
Looks like the CCP bots are out in force today. LMAO
@@c-chris3065 copy of the U S NGAD that flew back in 2020
NGAD has been long cancelled due to lack of Supersonic speed, low altitude capability and fly without wingman drone.
Its easy to search why its been cancelled.
there is no patent rule for militrary aircraft, whoever copies F-22, lockhead martin cannot sue them out side of US
6th gen is not that much about the exterior shape, but more on the sensors, the AI, and the integration that we can't tell from the pictures here.
China is now a country that can produce any generation fighter jet, Love 💕 China from Pakistan
If you're from Pakistan then you know the crappy weapons systems china has been selling you
I'm so glad you are all 6th gen experts and fluent in Chinese. What would the Pentagon do without you.
Kudos to China 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🥇🥇🥇👏👏👏🚀🚀🚀--👨🏽🦽🌴🦅☕️
360and Chinese doing excellent job
At propaganda you mean?
This is a replica of an American aircraft because it has wings, just like the US copied muskets and artillery invented in China because American artillery still has barrels.
What?
It is a commonly known fact that China steals technology. It is faster and cheaper than developing your own. That said, there are doubtless excellent engineers in China doing innovative research and development. Both can be true at once. Your attempt at a joke, however, just reveals your lack of confidence and is pathetic. Equally pathetic is having to go back a thousand years to single out a Chinese invention to highlight--surely you can showcase numerous more recent technological inventions. Next, we will hear you sing the praises of a water clock. LOL
that was a good one.
😂😂😂
@@caindarin9665 全世界都窃取了英国的蒸汽机技术。全世界都窃取了德国的火箭技术。
good and clear analysis based on current available info.👍
Thanks and welcome
Copycat theory is dead😂
Joseph Needham a British scientist/scholar researched and wrote several volumes on things Chinese invented. the readers were shocked, then the propaganda began.
Not really, if you go by the theory that China invented a time travelling machine and went 5 years into the future and copied this US stealth technology. But then you have to figure out whose time travelling capabilities did China copy….that my friend is the American exceptionalism paradox for American exceptionalist to figure out
Jealousy is hurt it’s not easy for Americans to accept the real facts
@@sniffybear2500Aiyyo Saar, you don’t understand, no? China, they copy everything, even Indian time-travel technology! They go to 2040, steal American fighter blueprints, but what happened? They couldn’t even touch Indian fighter technology! Why? Because Indian technology is too advanced, Saar. Also, we Indians, very trusting people, yes, but only one time, ok? Second time, we catch you red-handed! After all, Saar, we are from very ancient culture-5000 years of jugaad and intelligence. Who else can do IT support for the whole world and still invent time travel, ah? You tell me!
@@good_man4083 the doorman that uttered "The empire would turn Taiwan Strait into hellscape" was unusually quiet after the Zhuhai Air Show.
America : boohoo ! Its not six gen , and you copied it from us , crappy tofu dreg fighter !!! Boohoo ! 😂😂😂😂
Two WS15 and one detonation engine
不知道，但是对于进气道在上方，机动时可能会熄火，所以这可能是一台新发动机，并且没有考虑进行机动，而且新飞机大约需要6-11年才能服役，也就是2030-2035年之间才会服役，新型发动机的可能会很大
@@拳打台独脚踢美狗 高空高速突防时用吧 不像是空优战机。也许真是歼轰机
我觉得背部进气道在巡航或高速飞行后会关闭，三台发动机共用二个进气是可行的。@@拳打台独脚踢美狗
@@拳打台独脚踢美狗热障决定了速度上限，所以三台变循环的可能性是最大的。协和用4台涡喷都能2M巡航飞越大西洋了。
now, American draw the ppt, Chinese made it 😅
Made it? Does it properly work is another question, can’t even make your own jet turbines. Relying most on Russia and all of a sudden this? It’s Questionable.
@@tano5352 yes, every thing made in China is CGI and ppt. Nothing is true. China's space station is unreal, high speed railway is not true, 5G network or even 5.5G is not true, quantum satellite is not true, everything related to high-tech is China is not true..... Good.... Happy to know that u believe the above.
Like was the problem with YF-23... The engine and more...
@richardguttierez9038 u sound like a low IQ redneck
Please Americans don't feel threatened, this is an old aircraft.
fr,korean is the universal no.1
The US Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD ----- 6th generation fighter jet) becomes Next Generation Air Defense.
Sorry for all your analysis…China 6 th generation plane is the best & first in the whole world..congratulations China.
Just because you call it a thing, doesn't make it that thing.
They bloody thing has 3 engines because they can't generate the thrust from 2, not because it's "the future."
@@adamjd7645 How did you know? We, Chinese, we're told by Xi not to tell anyone about that 😮
beautiful aircraft design. More like spacecraft the way it's fly
Nice video and presentation.
If I understand this right, it’s vertical stabilizer(s) is replaced by drag steering, (skid steering), a kind of clap ailerons. In a right turn only the right clap open up, one up one down, and hence drag spin the plane in a clock wise turn, as the stealth bomber do. At the same time the left clamp stay closed and level. Normally only one clamp operate in a turn.
Why do the model in this video let the left and right clamps configured to open in a forward flight?
Don't forget differential thrust for minor adjustments, drag steer for turns.
Thank you for your detailed observation! You're correct in noting the drag-based control approach. This method seen in advanced stealth designs like the B-2 Spirit, reduces radar cross-section by eliminating traditional vertical stabilizers. The use of clamshell-style drag rudders allows precise yaw control without compromising stealth characteristics.
Regarding the dual clamp operation in forward flight, it could be a configuration to test symmetrical drag effects, potentially for stability or to simulate specific aerodynamic conditions. In operational settings, asymmetrical deployment is typically preferred for directional control, as you mentioned.
Differential thrust, as @ZweiZwolf highlighted, is another critical factor, especially in stealth platforms, for fine-tuning directional adjustments. Together, these systems provide agility while maintaining low observability.
You may be right about the symmetrical drag test explanation. However with together landing gears down, I think the drag on both clamps complementing the gear for one goal, a combined drag to stress the engine under test, at 50% or higher thrust. Also set up to determine a low speed stall speed limit. If so it is a safer plan to use in case the wing do enter a stall, the pilot can close all clamp flaps to recover the thrust sooner than the time it takes the engine to rev up from 1/3 thrust or so. Near stall speed it is easier for the camera crew to capture its flight images.
China flew two new fighters.
They can edit frame, body, shape, wings and engine. Whatever need to added or remove.
We should not forget that, J-31 prototype in its development stage eventually became J-35. This unnamed bomber may be China's H-20. As its development continues, new technologies such as hypersonic flight and air superiority capabilities can be added turning it into H-21.😅
الصين عايشه في المستقبل ❤❤❤❤❤
need further details about airplant, if it equiped with ramjet (only in theory), it might be a power platform, stealth or not, when it fast enought, who cares ?
of course you care. You don't want to just keep running away from missiles from all direction. You also want the element of surprise, not a bunch of missiles ahead waiting for you. Stealth is a lot more important.
It's my understanding that if one claims to be sixth gen fighters one has to refine their fifth gen fighters
你是提醒大家,F22在2010年就停止改进了吗?
And please do tell which aspect of the 5th. Generation fighter jet of china is not refined enough to qualify them to make the jump to 6th. Generation ?
If a country claims to have landed on the moon, it should first bring the two people on the space station home.
Great Analysis but we need more on this topic
China 1, Russia 2, US 3. Verdict 2025.
Happy chistmas Gift from Big CHINA.
This looks a lot like the Aurora bomber in Command & Conquer Generals.
People can cry about China copying all they want. But in the end, if it's an improvement to what China has, then they became that much more capable. Copying or not.
Copy from whom? They don't even.have😂
Until it's mass produced on a massive scale like their J-20 and proven itself in war games it means nothing to me.
When l0ser can't compete but full of anger, jealousy and desperation, just simply say, "It's copy."😅
@kinwaisiu9414 fools get cocky and underestimate their foes.
@@bubbalo3388 Deep inside their hearts are broken.🤭
Its mostly a bomber, I guarantee you
For sure. Its size and weapons bay speak to a medium range stealth bomber, not a fighter.
白癡
That is a lot of electrical power being produce on the J36..... China probably going to remove the third jet an add a gas tank or add a smaller electrical turbine to power a solid state laser or rail gun.
tha's not j36 zzz....there is 2 of them
Likely one for air force, one for navy.
Yes it is
Long Live China 🇨🇳❤
And Taiwan.
对于进气道在上方，机动时可能会熄火，所以这可能是一台新发动机，并且没有考虑进行机动，而且新飞机大约需要6-11年才能服役，也就是2030-2035年之间才会服役，新型发动机的可能会很大
I think it may be a hypersonic scram jet engine inlet
A beautiful bird
They dont need your confession so go home n sleep well😂
USA is worrying now. Being a superpower, one must got impressive air dominance. Things are changing to china's side very rapidly. USA is the loser obviously but it is good that USA will not be involved in war every where every year 😅😅
This is getting closer to Ace Combat territory. Where’s the Arsenal Bird
It was shown at Zhuhai 2024.
Let me tell the American experts that I heard the supersonic explosion in October 1, 2024 in my Chinese hometown. They have test flights long before 12/26/2024.
hi, anymore valuable intellegence?
It's got a massive top opening. Radar will see that.
关键他比5代机飞的高几倍，怎么发现？只有在其上方米波雷达才能探测，6代机飞的比5代机高很多
Fly higher than the fifth generation plane. He can hit you, but you can't. ′
Higher...
China proves they have 6rh gen aircraft by doing it. Our govt says they flew a 6th gen demonstrator five years ago...believe our govt?
无数仇恨者、撒谎者闭嘴了，对手也拒绝评论了，不知道说啥了，最后给出一句话，B21是六代机，也有人解释美国十年前就给出来六代机PPT，好吧，美国还是第一
让他们继续像大清一样，不是挺好的吗？大英帝国会因为大清的傲慢而生气吗？不会
美国人是无赖第一。
These are a lot of assertions. I'm not saying they are false, but it would have helped to explain their reasoning. For example, what makes you think it uses variable cycle engines? Why do you think it is a command platform? There is nothing wrong in speculation, but I would have preferred to hear arguments in defense of these claims.
The tone of the video is quite vague. We don't know a lot at this point, but admitting we don't know would be better than vagueness and unsupported statements.
He just got AI to string together all the bs buzz words like it means something.
Click bait or propaganda... either way, pretty pathetic.
The air intakes don't look very big for a plane with 3 engines.
Bro 3rd intake on top near canapy
The third intake is on top near canapy
@@haseebjavedjarral6278 Oh god thanks bro. BRO
US still has the #1 air force in the world, and China is still #3.
Yes USA is always number 1 in the world but India is number one in the universe
USA spend 2 trillions for F35 😂 300 millions by Raptor 2 billions by B21 raider,2 billions by B2 and China create the Futur !😂
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Drei Triebwerke? Das ist rar...
Ja, drei Triebwerke sind in der Luftfahrt tatsächlich selten. Historisch gesehen gab es Flugzeuge wie die McDonnell Douglas DC-10, die Lockheed L-1011 TriStar und die Dassault Falcon 7X, die mit drei Triebwerken ausgestattet waren. Diese Konfiguration wurde oft gewählt, um eine Balance zwischen Leistung, Reichweite und Sicherheit zu bieten.
Heutzutage dominieren zweistrahlige und vierstrahlige Designs, da moderne Triebwerke deutlich zuverlässiger und effizienter geworden sind.
It will replace de JH-7A. It's not a fighter.
Hmmm
😂😂partner“jh”歼轰这个感念已经是一个非常过时的概念了，全世界都在认同这个概念过时，就你们不认同😂😂
For an estimation this video is eerily precise like in its narration.
🇨🇳👍🏼❗️
This is NOT a 6th gen fighter jet, The smaller one is.... That's a Supersonic bomber drone😓
是7代
When it comes face to face with the F 22, then see who wins. America has the best fighter jets. Should arrange a show down and let the world know who is better.
F22 will not see it , It flies higher and faster, F22 got shot down and even not know when it comes the mislle.
Also it depends on the pilots too. Britain has the best pilots and Israel too. The Chinese should improve on their pilots skills. Unless there is a show down nobody knows who is better. The russian su 35 also got show down in Ukraine. So pilot skills is also important.
Just deal with balloon & drones above your military base first then talk about fighter jets.
F22 is old junk 😅😅. How to fight 😅
@@andychen6608 F22= Antique 🤭
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
This planes will anothers copying US 6gen jets? I thinking so.. hahahaha
If you think so well game on you lose 😂😂😂😂😂
What u.s 6th gen
It's made in China it will be a bag of poo
When l0ser can't compete but full of anger, jealousy and deperation, just simply say, "It's copy."🤭
It should be JH-36, thanks.
why?
战斗机在不断变大，F22比F15大，J20比J10大，F15和J10又比F4和J8大，不要用落后的眼光看待新事务。另外，成飞从来没有做过JH
不可能同時出兩架單純殲擊機..
@@RobertRobert-cu7pt有可能这飞机是歼轰，如果网上猜测的中间发动机是循环爆震发动机的话，这飞机可以在亚太空以6 mach速度飞行，纯歼击机没必要这么干，这都是截击机的范围了。再加上这飞机这么大明显是为了携带更多燃油跟大型导弹，比如鹰击，应该还可以携带反卫星导弹，甚至核弹
f-14 tomcat is the best till 2300
ਤੁਹਾਡਾ ਜਵਾਬ ਘਿਣਾਉਣਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਤੁਹਾਡਾ ਦਿਮਾਗ ਸੂਰ ਵਾਂਗ ਬਰੇਨਵਾਸ਼ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਇੰਟਰਨੈੱਟ ਤੱਕ ਪਹੁੰਚ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਣੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ, ਇਹ ਘਿਣਾਉਣੀ ਹੈ। 😂😅😅😅😅
Nahhhhh Bro, they retired it from the navy way back in 2006 and replaced it with never aircraft like the F-35B and C. So, it can’t be that good😅.
美国涡扇风洞最高速度15马赫30毫秒,中国JF-22激波风洞是33马赫40毫秒,开一次驱动功率是三峡的75%,美国起码需要20年才能达到中国现在风洞的水平,这也是中国20年前就有高超音速导弹,美国到现在也没有搞出来的原因,也就是说,美国的6代飞机想要进入太空飞行,起码20到30年后.这还是假设美国国债不爆,还有钱搞研发的情况下,
Вы сначала постройте самолёт на такую скорость, у вас может быть и 50 мах, толку от того, вы всё копируете, привет из Киева, и как там наш Ляонин, и его копии?😂
@@ЮрийКуличев-ж6о 你为什么不关心一下自己的国家？乌克兰被西方人讥讽为欧洲的子宫。反倒是中国人相对很尊重乌克兰。乌克兰不可怜吗？被西方人卖了还要替人家数钱。
@@ЮрийКуличев-ж6о if it wasn't the US your country still in peace right, what is the next plan now😅
@@ЮрийКуличев-ж6о 还活在上个世纪?中国现在每年专利申请量占全世界一半.日本文部科学省的报告:过去三年，在全球被引用次数前10%,前1%的自然科学领域论文数量，中国都是世界第一.来自澳大利亚战略政策研究所的报告,在44个下一代最关键科技领域,中国有37个是世界第一,美国只有7个,现在只是刚开始,未来中美的差距会越拉越大,中国只是回到历史上正常的位置,别忘记了,你们当年是靠着中国的指南针,水密舱,火枪火炮这些技术才控制美洲的
@@vinterutab2822 Вы все технологии воруете, или копируете, вам никогда не обогнать США, весь рынок сбыта вашего дешевого хлама идёт в Европу и США, вы не высокотехнологическая держава, все технологии в США И Европе, вы зависите от них, как рынок сбыта, и от доллара сша!
How would you analyze something you have no information about 😂
It's too big, looks like a bomber
that's why it' s a long range assassinator
A guided missile destroyer with wings
It's designed for very fast supersonic up to mach4 ... and with lots of armaments can serve as the deep penetration plane even to near space .
Being with tails means it is designed to fly very fast .
Yes, can function as a bomber and deep penetration plane.
neither fighter or bomber. it is a new category.
@@bixudiwon6363 a plane can either be a fighter or bomber OR BOTH as in this case.
But my guess is it is more of a new plane that is able to reach near space which will give it longer range , very high supersonic , lots more of ammo, long range and acts as forward AWAC detecting all including stealth.
That is my opinion... no one really knows
why you know so much about the new aircraft in such detail, are you the designer?😜!
Welche Experten, haben doch vorher keine Ahnung von der Existenz des Kampfflugzeuges gehabt. Nachdenken
Bad dreams ..... 😂
Code name.... sitting duck🙄 cool propaganda video 😂
Good 👍
Thanks
It’s “ambition” for sure 🤣
America never made a delta wing? 😂 I say do the research again F-102
I'll say the more commonly known US delta wing fighter are the F-106s, they are developed from 102, have less built, but were better known then 102, because they were used as back drop for both F-4 and F-15...
Appears if they were inspired by the Darkstar
6TH GEN?!?!? Widely acknowledged by WHO?
To be precise, it is just an improved version of j10c, which was confirmed by a general of our country!
Then don’t worry about it then lol
The message to US military stealth experts, who knows what’s 6th generation. Us normal people wouldn’t know stealth if it hit us on our face.
@@hkbennyyeah you are right，JuZuo，yes？
@@donkeykong516 We don't know about coatings and such, but shape is something that can be assessed, and this is pretty good.
Overrated..
Stupidity has no medicine 😂
Over rated by who's standard ? Donald Trump ? Or Sleepy Joe ?
@ go figure..
Another but hurt westerner
🍇😂
You can drive a Mercedes, but if you have no skills in driving all you’re doing is just con jesting the lane. 🤣🤣🤣
Chinese fighter jet pilots would engage in confrontational maneuvers with their US counterparts every once in a while in real life standoffs over West Pacific, so at least they've got some good training, thanks to the US. They lack the kind of operational experience that the Russians have, but I think they are much more professional than most other air forces around the world. Underestimate them at your own risk
Three engines on the J-36 is a lot of weight for an aircraft. That will be a lot of mass to turn with those little flapperons. With China’s definition of a 6th gen fighter including the concept of thrust vectoring and ultra maneuvering I would bet they’re really going for a new thrust vectoring engine. This thing would certainly need an engine like that.
With that in mind, I bet this is going to be one seriously maintenance intensive aircraft. Logistics will probably also be a challenge. In speaking of which does anyone have an idea how well China’s maintenance practices are for their advanced fighters? Do they use primarily contractors? If so with their large quantity of J-20s, this thing, j-35, drones, and their new bombers. I’ll be interested to see if they’re able to keep up maintenance during conflict
China's sixth-generation fighter jets use pulse detonation engines (PED).
I can tell you for sure that it is not possible, because in 2023, China's manufacturing output will only account for 35% of the world's total, and we hope to increase it to 45% by 2030.
It's not a dogfighter, it's a supersonic carrier interceptor. Fast and stealthy from the front, with a large, heavy munitions loadout to strike from far beyond visual range. China's military is all state, no contractors.
China is not like the United States, where the manufacturing industry is hollowed out, so the maintenance cost is no more than half of that of the United States. Of course, the same is true for purchasing aircraft. This way you can understand that the hollowing out of the US manufacturing industry and the large number of talents going to the financial, legal and other service industries are definitely strategic mistakes, and this situation is irreversible. In this competition, the United States is doomed to lose!
Your point about the potential weight challenges of the J-36 with three engines is interesting. China's focus on incorporating advanced thrust-vectoring engines aligns with their stated goals for sixth-generation capabilities, including ultra-maneuverability & advanced electronic warfare systems.
Regarding maintenance, China's rapid advancements in aerospace technology suggest significant investment in logistics and support infrastructure. While there isn’t much publicly available data on their maintenance practices, it's worth noting that their military-industrial complex has increasingly integrated domestic contractors & automated systems to manage their growing fleet, including the J-20, J-35, and newer platforms.
It will indeed be interesting to see how these systems perform & are sustained during prolonged operations or conflict scenarios.
Cool propaganda video. 🥴
😂😂😂 Ur IQ is below the average people, surprising you can use internet. Wow ...
@VIVIANLIU0310 Ohh... poor baby can't come up with anything so resorts to insults.
China hasn't been able to match the F-22 let alone the F-35, they've had all sorts of issues with their turbines (the J-20 is struggling), & you think they're going to leap ahead with an aircraft the size of a block of flats that needs 3 engines to fly? Cool story, bro. 🤡
@@adamjd7645 Ohh... poor baby ,hopefully your health insurance can cover your mental illness🃏
I have come to the conclusion that the CCP is full of poop 😂
就喜欢看你们这种干不过我们只能发疯的样子
Exactly, Ur brainwashed brain and lazy ass make u as dumb as a poop.😂😂😂😂😂
ਤੁਹਾਡਾ ਜਵਾਬ ਘਿਣਾਉਣਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਤੁਹਾਡਾ ਦਿਮਾਗ ਸੂਰ ਵਾਂਗ ਬਰੇਨਵਾਸ਼ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਇੰਟਰਨੈੱਟ ਤੱਕ ਪਹੁੰਚ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਣੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ, ਇਹ ਘਿਣਾਉਣੀ ਹੈ।
Denial
Anger✅
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance
Looks like the muricans have moved on to the second stage of grief😂
We're taking chinas word as to the performance of these new 6 gen. ? Havent we learned anything?
😂😂😂😂 Americans cant swallow this pill
@@eastman69
The pill is hollow. lol
@@eastman69 prove this isn't just another Chinese red pill. Nobody believes china can pull off a tech leap like they say 🤣🤣
Experts? And analysis with no information?
It is a plane oh opps, actually planes, two of, look like diamond 💎 shape, no yellow paint like the display in the recent Zhuhai show, is this a production model, testing model, demo model.
Can't tell you anything more.
I am an expert, such a joke
중국비행기는 다 한국비행기들이다 한국것 모방한거 우주정거장도 한국기술이죠
你在说什么😂？宇宙第一，韩国！
South Korea does not have the technology to manufacture airplanes and aerospace.
@@拳打台独脚踢美狗 우주기술 한자 공자 동아시아문화 군사문화 대부분 고대부터 일본 중국이 한국것모방했습니다 서양도 지금 한국기술문화 따라합니다
@@호롱방不要為了翻譯的流量做這些事
北韓🇰🇵的網軍
Nice AI generated video
Us too AI fuckers
Lol keep thinking that way and you might get a brutal wake up call when you see one in your media and it will probably tge last thing you will ever see if a conflict breaks out...
True. Nothing to see here. Can go back to sleep
精彩的评论😊希望你说的是实话😊
Does it properly work is another question, can’t even make your own jet turbines. Relying mostly on Russia built turbines and all of a sudden this? It’s Questionable.
Dude... Your info are outdated by at least 40 years... XD
WS15
They've been building their own jet turbines for years now, they only relied on Russian imports initially because it was cheaper and allowed their fighter jets to be operational sooner. You are so behind in information. They have also built actually working hypersonic ICBMs and other advanced missiles, all of which depend on super advanced engine designs, all of which the US/NATO doesn't have, so there is no reason to believe that somehow China doesn't have the engineering or industrial capacity to build the engines proper to a 6th generation platform... Or whatever they intend to do with "J-36"
你甚至不能自己独立思考，主要依靠西方主流媒体的虚假信息，然后你突然学会了质疑？这是值得怀疑的🤣🤣
虽然我很喜欢你这样的傻子越多越好，但是你这个有点太傻了。发动机都造不出来，我们造新飞机干什么？拍短视频啊？我们可没有多余的钱像你们那样挥霍。
Never show your cards… China’s biggest mistake.
The US showed the SR-71 early on - that went OK
J20's maiden flight was like only 12 years ago. I'm guessing they already started at that time the design of this new jet. So they prolly cooking something else already at this point.
当底牌过于先进就变成了威慑，威慑就应该光明正大展示出来，就像当年美国有了原子弹之后对日本做的那样
China need to show something which selected so as to warn some countries better keep safe distance, they won't show you their most advanced and confidential technology
😂This is nothingo more that China Lies. Do more research!
Cry and cope my fine, sub-retard friend!!
@@johnsmith1953x You earned your rice for the day, comrade. Well done.
@@caindarin9665 Suck it Mary.
You need to learn to write. Are you a yank? That would explain the lack of coherent English .
It's just a model. It's a second-generation aircraft at most.
When the tempest comes out then you will see a real 6th gen fighter....
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ya let's see when it will be launch and not on ppt lol.
Cringe
Three engines, who's engines? Russian's or their own? With Russian it might work they make a good dependable engine as for the Chines engines if it is theirs, they needed three to get it off the ground. They haven't advanced their jet tech as far as the Russians and the US and reverse engineering only goes so far.
Ignorance! Just search for China's WS-15 and WS10B, they are better than the same level engines of Russia and the United States!
The thrust and durability of Russian aircraft engines are inferior to those of Chinese ones. The Chinese have long stopped using Russian engines!
China's jet engines, particularly those of the j35 and j20 are much better than the engine of the f35.
The j20 does not use afterburners to perform supercruise whereas the f35 can not perform supercruise without using an afterburner
China now use indian engines, they normally will fall apart in 2 years, but only cost $100 per one, I ordered last week, not bad
Lol dude the original j20 had russian engines which was horrendous! China updated the J20s with their own domestically built WS15 engines
Esas görevleri Dünyanın oksijenini bir an önce bitirmek. Onbinlece jet sadece petrol tüketmiyor dimi? Tüm ülkeler oksijeni boşuna bitiriyor.😢
s b
@@高雨-b2c 这就是传说中的环保主义者吧🤣
6th gen says who??
cant even prove a proper 5th gen now theyre bragging about 6th gen?! What a Joke!
they didn't say sheet.
Hope all US generals think the way like you. China PLA is at least 50 years behind of US Army. No need to have a meeting at 4am.
You can think whatever you want, no one cares.
Accurately china said nothing on any jet.😂
蛙蛙不要藏着了
Its basically the 4th gen fighter j-20 refitted with a delta wing. nothing speacial, still a 4th gen at best.
Even if it was. The profile makes it even less detectable by radar and harder to spot.
It's just a model. It's a second-generation aircraft at most.
You continue to fall behind the Chinese because you continue to underestimate the Chinese. Stop crying already, you losers! 😊
@@Huaxiaviewpoint华夏观点 a flying model with a radical design that doesn't have vertical stabilizers. It's a big step.
It's all CGI. Now go back to your mom's basement.
Ah! The Junk 36.
3 engines O-O-O
Come on, it's made in China!
White people arrogance and race discrimination.
蠢屌丝，呵呵，国家通货膨胀高涨，人民苦不堪言的国家取笑中国？！哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈，我相信你就是最穷和最蠢的那一个！
Show uis your italian fighter?
La sale mentalité italiane， IMAO
你母亲用的内裤也是made in China。