whats crazy is the car is released in 2013 or so, the design team has to think so far ahead in trends and what not, the level of design being release in 2010 versus the conceptual design in the same year
Great my pleasure to show my sketch drawing to Flavio Manzoni masterpiece designer at the last MotorShow in Geneva. Ferrari La Ferrari Top Class Project!
i guess Im randomly asking but does any of you know a tool to log back into an Instagram account?? I was stupid lost the login password. I would appreciate any assistance you can give me!
I know this is an old comment, but still relevant today. As you can see here ua-cam.com/video/vuEMhfD0eCI/v-deo.html , Lamborghini’s design language aims to a more solid, “mono” body design. They also use far more sharper lines and geometrical forms. On the contrary, Ferrari’s designs aim to a more curvilinear and detached form.
This gentleman looks very penetrating. Which calls to my mind, such concerns as industrial espionage or staffing issues even, More so with the auto industry being as globalized as it now is. But isn't such high levels of excellence, strictly dependent on resources at hand, including developmental times, raw talent/expertise and projected goals (stated expectations), either relating to individual projects or as standard practices of companies (i.e, work culture) in general? With all other inputs, although sometimes necessary, really serving a detracting and delimiting role to the final product?
+toobad Development of LaFerrari started many years before anyone saw a GT. LaFerrari is 2013 car, Ford GT will be 2017 car. If there's a company which copy anything, it's Ford as always. Look how they stole the Aston Martin's design on the latest models.
+Radek Vinš i agree. also some elements of the two 1:1 models look oddly similar to p1, even the front of the profile drawing at 0:41 has a front end that looks similar to p1. i wonder if some of these designs was leaked before they want them to go public.
@@popeyeisgood No, one thought can be thought by many people. Of course it's easier if you know the thought you wanne be thinking. It's a central part of design to think things further, so if everybody start's with the same base knowledge, of the designs that are already out there, it's easy to take the next step in the same direction. You see it also alot in science - especially back in the day: People proofing things, that already been proofen, because they weren't aware of that the proof already existed, because it's been publisched in a different country in a different language for example. For example, the Gaussian elimination, for solving linear equation systems, named after it's „inventor” mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss, was already known to the Chinese some 2000 years before. Another example: Differetiaton of functions was independently developed by Newton and Leibniz. Even the internal combustion engine, many people worked on that independently, it was just the next logical step. What i can think of, is that maybe some designers changed their employer, from McLaren to Ferrari or the other way around. But similaritys in design can verry possible be there without anyone spying on someone or something getting leaked.
Hi, Jesus has die on the cross for our sins and rose back from the death on the 3rd day to justify us. Believe in Jesus like your LORD and SAVIOR and you are saved.
Weak-sauce. When I look at these beautiful concepts versus the final product, I can only sneer at it. I can't believe this design is intended to bridge the 10 year gap to Ferraris next Halo car. In comparison to the P1, Huayra and the 918, this looks pretty boring and less exciting.
In my opinion, the LaFerrari is by far the best of all the cars you mentioned (at least design-wise, not talking about performance). Many McLarens look all similar and they're just designed for speed, which is fine for a performance car, but absolutely lack elegance and style. Porches are just boring...and the 918 is not much different from the other even tough is a great car. The only one that gets close or might be better is the Huayra because it has extreme attention to details and a very original yet elegant design
whats crazy is the car is released in 2013 or so, the design team has to think so far ahead in trends and what not, the level of design being release in 2010 versus the conceptual design in the same year
Muito bom
Brasíl
Great my pleasure to show my sketch drawing to Flavio Manzoni masterpiece designer at the last MotorShow in Geneva. Ferrari La Ferrari Top Class Project!
i guess Im randomly asking but does any of you know a tool to log back into an Instagram account??
I was stupid lost the login password. I would appreciate any assistance you can give me!
@Milo Juan Instablaster =)
How necessary was it to have that music playing in the background?
As necessary as I wanted it to be ;)
I want that F150. Its soooo very gorgeous.
It’s completely amazing
Where is Pininfarina?
Can we get a new video about new Ferrari F80
Very nice.. thnx
Maybe a sound engineer could help get rid of that horrible background noise.
They need to make a revert back to classic designs. Instead of the futuristic, sharp lines sort of style. Beginning to resemble Lamborghini.
I know this is an old comment, but still relevant today. As you can see here ua-cam.com/video/vuEMhfD0eCI/v-deo.html , Lamborghini’s design language aims to a more solid, “mono” body design. They also use far more sharper lines and geometrical forms. On the contrary, Ferrari’s designs aim to a more curvilinear and detached form.
これは、日本車では、真似できない！保守的過ぎるのが日本の車だ！流石、フェラーリのデザイナーだ！
Mobil jepang tidak suka meniru.
Mobil jepang cuma bisa juara dakar, juara WRC, juara WEC...
This gentleman looks very penetrating. Which calls to my mind, such concerns as industrial espionage or staffing issues even, More so with the auto industry being as globalized as it now is. But isn't such high levels of excellence, strictly dependent on resources at hand, including developmental times, raw talent/expertise and projected goals (stated expectations), either relating to individual projects or as standard practices of companies (i.e, work culture) in general? With all other inputs, although sometimes necessary, really serving a detracting and delimiting role to the final product?
Whats new, now, Flavio ? :))
honestly i thought pininfirina designed the laf
Brasíl
this reminds me the rx7 in Tokyo drift
0:43, ford GT sketch. Probably a coincidence.
+toobad Development of LaFerrari started many years before anyone saw a GT. LaFerrari is 2013 car, Ford GT will be 2017 car. If there's a company which copy anything, it's Ford as always. Look how they stole the Aston Martin's design on the latest models.
+toobad flying buttress is not Ford GT unique feature. Many Ferrari's had that before, 599 for example.
+Radek Vinš i agree. also some elements of the two 1:1 models look oddly similar to p1, even the front of the profile drawing at 0:41 has a front end that looks similar to p1. i wonder if some of these designs was leaked before they want them to go public.
@@popeyeisgood No, one thought can be thought by many people. Of course it's easier if you know the thought you wanne be thinking. It's a central part of design to think things further, so if everybody start's with the same base knowledge, of the designs that are already out there, it's easy to take the next step in the same direction. You see it also alot in science - especially back in the day: People proofing things, that already been proofen, because they weren't aware of that the proof already existed, because it's been publisched in a different country in a different language for example.
For example, the Gaussian elimination, for solving linear equation systems, named after it's „inventor” mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss, was already known to the Chinese some 2000 years before. Another example: Differetiaton of functions was independently developed by Newton and Leibniz. Even the internal combustion engine, many people worked on that independently, it was just the next logical step.
What i can think of, is that maybe some designers changed their employer, from McLaren to Ferrari or the other way around. But similaritys in design can verry possible be there without anyone spying on someone or something getting leaked.
Ma per favore...
🌳🪽👈👍
Hi, Jesus has die on the cross for our sins and rose back from the death on the 3rd day to justify us. Believe in Jesus like your LORD and SAVIOR and you are saved.
Tisi _ Amen !
Ferrari, bring back pininfarina please
Weak-sauce.
When I look at these beautiful concepts versus the final product, I can only sneer at it.
I can't believe this design is intended to bridge the 10 year gap to Ferraris next Halo car.
In comparison to the P1, Huayra and the 918, this looks pretty boring and less exciting.
YOU HAVE A BAD TASTE IN DESIGN THEN.
In my opinion, the LaFerrari is by far the best of all the cars you mentioned (at least design-wise, not talking about performance). Many McLarens look all similar and they're just designed for speed, which is fine for a performance car, but absolutely lack elegance and style. Porches are just boring...and the 918 is not much different from the other even tough is a great car. The only one that gets close or might be better is the Huayra because it has extreme attention to details and a very original yet elegant design
delbroox I like Trabant 💗
this guy can talk for ages and still not say anything
I guess it does sound like that to someone who doesn't want to, or straight up can't, understand.