6:50 Julio, to me it seemed horrible that you interrupted Daniel at this spot. He was talking about how his view of Mike Matusow has really diminished over the past 18-months, and may have gone into more detail if you had allowed him the opportunity. Instead, you interrupted at that point to mention that Mike made it to heads-up with Hellmuth at the LAPC. I wish you had waited several seconds to determine whether or not Daniel had said all he wanted to say on that subject. Or, in general, if he wanted to talk more about the issue of people in the poker community who owe him money, and he hasn't felt they've been honest about things. I've listened to a few of these - Jason Koon, Scott Seiver, Andrew Lichtenberger, Mike Sexton, and Jean-Robert Bollande. Overall I've found them very enjoyable and think you do a good job. Thank you for this free content. I think, however, you could make them better if you gave your guests more of an opportunity to respond to your questions, rather than rushing to interject your point of view during the conversations.
Daniel should do dmt. He could play with the elves. I think they'd be able to see his whole cards though. For real though I can't imagine how he would play after that. At least mushroom lol
Daniel is about to go into a very interesting story about Mike Matasow. Interviewer: "Mike Matasow got heads up in a tournament." Could you have picked a worse time to interrupt a guest? And could have picked a more banal, uninteresting subject to interrupt him with? Jesus.
6:50
Julio, to me it seemed horrible that you interrupted Daniel at this spot. He was talking about how his view of Mike Matusow has really diminished over the past 18-months, and may have gone into more detail if you had allowed him the opportunity. Instead, you interrupted at that point to mention that Mike made it to heads-up with Hellmuth at the LAPC. I wish you had waited several seconds to determine whether or not Daniel had said all he wanted to say on that subject. Or, in general, if he wanted to talk more about the issue of people in the poker community who owe him money, and he hasn't felt they've been honest about things.
I've listened to a few of these - Jason Koon, Scott Seiver, Andrew Lichtenberger, Mike Sexton, and Jean-Robert Bollande. Overall I've found them very enjoyable and think you do a good job. Thank you for this free content. I think, however, you could make them better if you gave your guests more of an opportunity to respond to your questions, rather than rushing to interject your point of view during the conversations.
He always interrupts the players
@@habibbasma7880 absolutely agree
Why don't you put the link in the description as well as the video?
Daniel's smart ways! Thanks for sharing
Anyway I can get the transcript to this interview so I can use it in a college English paper ?
yes
"everytime I tap my wife I gotta see your name" - ROFL ROFL ROFL 33:47
Great interview!
woahh that story about Stu gave me chills. Something supernatural there
Don't do Molly? I've done a few mollysssss.
Daniel should do dmt. He could play with the elves. I think they'd be able to see his whole cards though. For real though I can't imagine how he would play after that. At least mushroom lol
Eddy who? Idk how to spell his name...
Daniel is about to go into a very interesting story about Mike Matasow.
Interviewer: "Mike Matasow got heads up in a tournament."
Could you have picked a worse time to interrupt a guest? And could have picked a more banal, uninteresting subject to interrupt him with? Jesus.
Stop asking worst bad beat they've dished out. Makes them appear like a fish/donkey and they don't remember
he has never done anything wrong, just ask him, full of himself