Arrhenius Equation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @dragonlady1970
    @dragonlady1970 11 років тому +4

    Agree 100%. That's the mark of a GOOD teacher. That's why I come on UA-cam, lots of average teachers out there...

  • @akhilr123456789
    @akhilr123456789 12 років тому +5

    Keep going mate!!! This channel is a boon for all the folks who finds chemistry tough !!!
    Well done

  • @zainabsafi2063
    @zainabsafi2063 10 років тому +16

    Thank you soo much for all of these videos. I am studying pharmacy..and i have learned chemistry just from you..you are the best.

  • @garvisamariya2706
    @garvisamariya2706 11 років тому +3

    these videos really help a lot. thank you very much

  • @FSTK
    @FSTK 10 років тому +1

    I was interested in the Arrhenius relationship wrt the decay rate of magnetic material that is found in tapes and hard drive disks such how the temperature of the surrounding environment can impact the integrity of the data stored for long-term preservation since it is becoming more and more practical to use magnetic disks in order to store data, as opposed to optical solutions. It is good to recall this kind of video in study. :)

  • @lazypunk794
    @lazypunk794 13 років тому +4

    one mistake. u said 6M conc would remain same at all temp. however conc changes with change in temperature as molarity is temperature dependent.

  • @gogog5783
    @gogog5783 7 років тому +6

    A big thumbs up from this guy! Keep at it and maybe you'll find a cure for the common cold!!!!! :)

  • @brian_mcnulty
    @brian_mcnulty 8 років тому +6

    So, how do I calculate both the frequency factor and the activation energy? I have k and T so far and some data I used to get the rate laws. I'm stuck here.

    • @TheDuvee6
      @TheDuvee6 8 років тому +2

      Draw a graph that relates lnk vs 1/T. The slope is activation energy. Sub into
      lnk = -activation energy/RT +lnA and solve for A.
      A is frequency factor

    • @marinbagaric4755
      @marinbagaric4755 5 років тому

      u dont need to draw a graph. Take: Ea = [-R*ln(k of T1)/k of T2))] /(1/T1) - (1/T2). i hope u understand it

  • @abhisheksharma2060
    @abhisheksharma2060 9 років тому +5

    well taught thanks !!!!!!!!!

  • @Yaveyta
    @Yaveyta 12 років тому +1

    You are awesome!!

  • @Loren_Shaw
    @Loren_Shaw 13 років тому +2

    Very helpful

  • @hatimali7872
    @hatimali7872 4 роки тому +1

    thank you so much it was really helpful and reduced the problem.

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  4 роки тому +3

      You're very welcome! Thanks for watching! 😀

  • @Yoyimbo01
    @Yoyimbo01 12 років тому +1

    Hey guys, I'm doing a lab report on the reaction H2C2O4+KMnO4+H2SO4. We had some beakers whose solutions varied in their temperature. On another we added the catalyst manganese sulfate and observed that that reactions time to complete equaled that of around 34 degrees C. I thought that if I could calculate the energy that the reaction + 34 degrees made, then I would have the activation energy for the catalyst. Can I use the Arrhenius equation and if so, how do I find what order this is in?

  • @climax7260
    @climax7260 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much!

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  3 роки тому

      You're very welcome! Thanks for watching 😀

  • @kinza7549
    @kinza7549 9 років тому +1

    this is GREAT

  • @anuu5553
    @anuu5553 4 роки тому +1

    very helpful!

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  4 роки тому +1

      Glad it was helpful! Thanks for watching!

  • @abhinavsreesancp
    @abhinavsreesancp 11 років тому

    You are a real help

  • @tacos394
    @tacos394 11 років тому +1

    thankyou for sharing!

  • @skyewindsor9418
    @skyewindsor9418 12 років тому +3

    And paying a small fortune to be taught by these teachers while UA-cam is free! Very sad indeed

  • @finisher3012
    @finisher3012 9 років тому +5

    Molarity IS a temperature dependent term!
    molarity is no. of moles/litre. As you increase the temp. the volume increases, thus decreasing the concentration.

    • @b_08_amitkumarsahu90
      @b_08_amitkumarsahu90 7 років тому

      yes u r right sir

    • @b_08_amitkumarsahu90
      @b_08_amitkumarsahu90 7 років тому

      but why should temp dependence lie on k plz tell

    • @umarirshad1445
      @umarirshad1445 6 років тому

      Only with the gaseous phase reactions. If liquid phase(with no phase change) is there, then its independent.

  • @marinbagaric4755
    @marinbagaric4755 5 років тому +1

    An example calculation would have been very useful, please

  • @farefouse
    @farefouse 6 років тому

    It's not really a constant if it changes.

  • @emilyallouise
    @emilyallouise 8 років тому +2

    How

  • @CandiceGabrielle2012
    @CandiceGabrielle2012 11 років тому

    when do we use 0.008206

  • @brucelaw3137
    @brucelaw3137 10 років тому +6

    there's a mistake in the video, Ea should be in unit J/mol

    • @bwibwi5
      @bwibwi5 10 років тому +2

      It's really the same thing.

    • @fatihahaider7165
      @fatihahaider7165 8 років тому +4

      bruce law i think u not known that j can be converted to kj by dividing it with 1000.

  • @Mingno.
    @Mingno. 12 років тому +1

    my blood calculator can't calculate the equation for me. DAMN, I WONDER WHAT GONNA HAPPEN IN EXAM :"( but anyway, GREATLY APPRECIATED VIDEO :D

  • @MeistroJB
    @MeistroJB 12 років тому

    Maybe. Point well taken. I would add another factor: the online lectures are specific single topics. Classes have broader scopes set by the accredation 'gurus' (read: traind apes). The big picture usualy come at the cost of sacrificing deapth.
    Mostly we go to school for the wallpaper (the diploma - supposedly our ticket out of starvation) and we do the online lectures for deeper insight (and fun). (between me and you - many teachers, e.g. my H.S. chem teach, are drunk and should be fired)

  • @shanthala1345
    @shanthala1345 2 роки тому

    Thank you

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  2 роки тому

      You're very welcome! Many thanks for watching 😀

  • @babalooj
    @babalooj 13 років тому

    thank you!!

  • @balghari123
    @balghari123 8 років тому +4

    that diagram is for exothermic reaction not for endothermic...

  • @belulbereket2431
    @belulbereket2431 7 років тому

    thank u so much!!!

  • @nick011894
    @nick011894 11 років тому +1

    2 People failed their chem test.

  • @mistree0007
    @mistree0007 8 років тому +3

    waht i came for is how the reaction rate actually varies with increase n decrease of temperature. no video is about that. everyone is just explaining what each term in equation stands for :-(

  • @cooltop1
    @cooltop1 12 років тому

    @drmariawaris
    lmao exactly right lol.... my teacher was explaining this topic for a staggering 5 hours... -,- and nothing went into my head lol... all the students were like what?? :/ and then i said USE UA-cam lol...........................and they were like NYC IDEA. I am never coming to school again

  • @ryandyc
    @ryandyc 10 років тому +4

    AP CHEM FTW!!!!!!!

    • @MegaDeathadder
      @MegaDeathadder 7 років тому

      What is ap chemistry? Im learning this for basic chemistry lol

  • @Toni-vo3bi
    @Toni-vo3bi 11 років тому

    will you please just sit my exam for me :)
    Thanks

  • @Danray233
    @Danray233 11 років тому +15

    STOP SAYING KELVINS!!

    • @keeganmaloney3440
      @keeganmaloney3440 10 років тому +2

      who cares? we know what he means, that is the purpose of language.

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  10 років тому +10

      That's what they're called, dude.

    • @keeganmaloney3440
      @keeganmaloney3440 10 років тому +1

      I think he was saying that it shouldn't be plural, but who cares right?

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  10 років тому +4

      Oh I certainly don't care. That's for sure. But that's interesting to me, because I've always heard it pluralized with an "s".

    • @MrSokkrokker
      @MrSokkrokker 10 років тому +3

      ***** It's like saying 39 Fahrenheits