@@mac2626 its isn't that great but its made in india and technology transfer has helped defense ecosystem of the country also they were upgraded with french night visions indegenious turrets tot and modifying designs are not something americans or germans would allow so the best option
@@mac2626 Why? The tank is still good, it's just that the thoroughly corrupt Russian army fails to maintain them properly along with bad planning and poor morale. The tech itself is just fine.
Missed the largest operator of T 90, India Currently operates 2078 T-90S 'Bhishma' which were procured in three separate orders. Also most armor and active protection systems shown in the video are now replaced with much better systems and there is a remote controlled weapon station in the new version. Update : (After the ukraine war situation, with out a effective Active protection systems & proper coordination between infantry effectiveness of T 90 is questionable.)
Abramham tanks has only been used against third world poor countries were their only attacking equipment is old RPG's....so not a correct comparision smarty pants.
Besides, the Ukranians have recieved modern anti tank Javeline missiles, at that point it wont matter if its a T90 or an Abraham, both will get toasted. So thinkg before you start commenting next time.
@@servercookie6470 Wrong. Abrams (there's no h) crew can survive top attack, especially since the Javelin (note the spelling, again) is US made, they have obviously tested their own systems against each other. The rubbish Russian T-90, as we have seen in Ukraine, just cooks off and the crew are dead. Check your facts before being so cocky to others.
@@mauricetoussaint7283true but if the t90 slaps an abrams with an apfsds round its all over same for the abrams against the t90 thats what it comes down to but we might never witness that
Every tank is fantastic until you shoot it with an anti tank weapon in a place where the armor is not sufficient to stop it. The Javelin for example, would destroy any main battle tank around today, including the Abrams, T90's, Leopard 2's, etc. Impossible to add enough armor to the roof to stop one. Tanks are a very risky weapon in modern war, until there are reliable active countermeasures in place like the Israeli trophy system, anti tank weapons will always be able to stop them.
@@sexyitalian891 True. I would hate to be in a tank when there's javelin type weapons around. On the other hand it's not too much fun walking around in the open when an enemy tank takes aim at you either.
@@sexyitalian891 There a video by the UA-cam channel BattleOrder that does a fantastic job on discussing the tactics of weapons like the Javelin. They are not perfect. Tanks are still very useful. But my comment was only pointing out the common critique of the Abrams being a "gas-guzzler" and needing a robust supply line to be effective while it's claimed the T-72 and T-90 have no such weaknesses. It's clear now that the Russians have poor logistics and struggle to fuel their own tanks while the US has had no such trouble despite fielding the "inefficient, old, heavy, loud, and gas-guzzling" Abrams.
@@chaosXP3RT I don't think they struggle to fuel their vehicles it has a lot to do with the type of war being waged. They took an enormous amount of ground in the first days of the war so as to overwhelm and take as much territory as possible to consolidate with. The difference between Ukraine and Iraq is 1, Ukraine is 40% larger, and 2, its flat, and Russia is fighting against near parity in terms of technology. The Iraqi army and the insurgents in Iraq and Afganistan couldn't have hoped to be as well equipped or well trained as the Ukrainian army. Needlessly shitting on a military because you disagree with the war does no good. Looking at it objectively we can see that on a modern battlefield, no conventional army would stand up well under the same circumstances. The battlefield has vastly changed since 20 years ago. Mobile phones with satellite internet connections, drones, etc, can all tell the positions of people, there's no hiding for any of the forces on the ground on either side. My point I'm trying to make is that if you put America in the same scenario trying to invade Ukraine as it is now, they'd be suffering a lot of the same setbacks and losses. Their best M1 Tanks and Bradley IFV's would be turned into death capsules for the crews fighting against javelins and modern ATGM's. Any blitzkreig style warfare is going to leave vehicles unfueled. Support vehicles cannot keep up, its just not possible, they blitz, consolidate and move up logistics, establish chains, and continue. On the modern battlefield, at least for no, anti tank weapons have far outpaced the tank. No tank, not the most advanced Abrams, T90, Leopard 2, etc, can resist modern anti tank weapons by an enemy resilient enough to use them.
There are addons for some tanks, at least NATO ones, that get screwed on top of the turret and allow the tanks to drive through meters of deep waters...looks funny...otherwise you need pioneer troops to make a makeshift bridge. Oh wait, and a fuckton of logistics I guess. Seems the Russians did forget about that. Given how the war progresses, this video doesnt seem to have aged so well, or not? ;-)
0:43 This image of a tank is a huge mistake on author's part in the video, as that isn't T-72BU, but a separate radically different rival tank project, called OBJECT 187 which wasn't selected as the winner of the tender.
@@Jimbeam1990 It does matter, as Object 187 was so ahead of its time, its technologies led to the 4th generation of tanks. All UkroNazis are getting fucked by Surovikin in ukraine and the popcorn 🍿 never tasted more sweeter, while watching all of U.S. vassals turned to fertilizer on tv and YT.
Its because they are stupid how many abrams tank got blown up during wartime? Pretty sure maybe 1 and the others were friendly fire or mechanical failure if the US was operating these tanks the loss rate would be signifcantly lower as proven
It was two Bradleys and drone support against a single T-90M with destroyed optics but the tank was almost undamaged by the Bradley fire, the crew was fine and they needed a drone to finally destroy the abandoned tank. On the other hand, brandleys are among the most destroyed vehicles on the battlefield since they are not supposed to be used for direct combat but rather to support fire only.
@@shanehiggins4142 dude it was on camera did you not watch the video? they have reactive armor dude show me a T-90 defeated by a rpg on video that's what's BS a rpg wont even take out a modern T-72 lol maybe you mean javelins...
And the T-90 would smoke the ambrams, people just mistake ambrams is a fucking god, no it's only a tank and like all tanks it explode, the only giustification we use is "ThE aBrAms WhaS aLReADY uSED in ComBaT!1!1!" Yeah used in gulf war against eraly cold war era
@@boom9256 Pretty sure them being with Nato automatically denies any military sales between Russia and Poland, so they couldn't buy Russian tanks even if they wanted to, no?
As tank's they're fine and are operating as a tank should. Tactical incompetence and poor logistics is what's making them look bad. Any tank, no matter what make will be a death trap without proper support and maintenance. It's been proven time and time again, since WWII yet some people have a hard time learning how to use them effectively and instead choose to use them for blunt force.
that's info is based on CNN lmao !! in reality is the javelin anti tanks head a big failure against russian tanks . they needed to hit one tank two or three times for it to explode lol . plus the russian in couple of days made a big armor cage for the tanks that protected them from the jev and it did work pretty good lol
@@skdfdjkdfjkd yeah i know it's hard for Americans and some Europeans aka British to accept the truth lol . instead of calling it cap do some research use your brain and stop beleving whatever the Western media tells you !!!! peace out
@@stabilis8895 the Tree Trunk 😹, Since Javelin was based on Infrared to lock-on but Somehow Russia used a Tree Log to conceal the Heat...and that’s why
proven in ukraine, 500-700 tanks were shot down. 80% of them were shot down by ex-soviet anti-tank guns. about 5 shots of javelin are seen in the network. about 60 of nlaw. but ukrainian propaganda makes western anti-tank guns seem like they work very well.
@@ka-52alligator39 Where are you getting your number of 10-15? There are 17 photo/video confirmed destroyed, damaged, or captured T-90s as of April 13, 2022. That is the absolute minimum and there are probably more. Check out Oryxspioenkop's list.
@@subverted only 1 loss of a T-90M tank so far, and at least over a hundred of these have been deployed to ukraine. In fact, this T-90M was scuttled by another Russian tank to prevent capture. Nobody claimed the T-90A was particularly good, it was merely a stopgap designed to be able to incorporate future upgrades just like the original M1 for the far better T-90M
@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here How are you defining "loss"? 🤣 At least two have been captured, two have been destroyed, and 3 more damaged just going off of the photo/video confirmed stuff.
@@subverted two destroyed? Lol good luck getting any evidence for the second one. And captured do not count, since these are not hull losses but rather have been simply abandoned by its crew
As of 20 April 2024, Oryx blog had documented that Russia had lost at least 125 T-90s since the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (visually confirmed), including 38 T-90A (of which 25 were destroyed, 1 damaged, 2 abandoned, 10 captured), 1 T-90AK (1 captured), 8 T-90S (7 destroyed, 1 abandoned) and 78 T-90M (42 ...
It seems that the Russians would use the German-style wedge formation in a frontal attack. They would put (T-95S) T-14 Armata with its heavy armor in the middle and ahead of other tanks because it has the best capacity to absorb the anti-tank fire. Next to a couple of T-14's, there would be T-90's and even farther back and on the sides, there would be other tanks.
You are wrong! The Russians have long used fabrics as 125mm sniper rifles. they support infantry advances with tanks or suppress fire positions. And they have learned to do it superbly. Today they use a technique - a tank carousel. I wouldn't want to be the opponent that this technique is used against.
@@KS-xo3oh and yet Russia is winning a harder battle than anything the USA has ever faced since WW2 USA usually just kills every living thing with massive air strikes before their delicate gender non binary troops tip toe in. Couldn't have them breaking a nail after all.
First I was like why the hell everyone barking at him for Indian T90?? After the video iam too be like-- Hey u forgot India, India is the largest operator of T90 even more then that of Russia!! Funfact-- India has been operating T90 even before Russia.🥂 How could u forget That!!🤧
the T-90 is a russian post-soviet tank, not indian. Just because india uses more of them then russia, (considering they bought them from russia) doesnt make them the inventors of it.
@@skibididopyesdop My bro u need to do some research Just Watch T90 Documentory.. After 1991 India helped Russia just like Soviet did for us in 1971. Many projects were funded by India. Even some of them were never used by India. Funfact-- Su30mki is also used By India even before Russian made it for themselves.
@@hmmmmn6770 yeah and you should not, as it is not fully true. T-90 was designed as Object 188 in the USSR without any indian involvement. So was original T-90 produced without any indian involvement. Only in 2001 India got formally involved as the country bought 310 T-90S "Bhishma" tanks. Most important novelity was the new welded turret, the development of which was funded at least partially by the indian order. This allowed the russians themselves to buy T-90As and market T-90SA / T-90. Yet, india had nothing to do with T-90 back in 1991.
@@slooob23 I get what you're saying. They'll be reduced in significance for sure. But they'll be around, especially for combined warfare offensive actions when they are, you know, actually covered by mechanized infantry and air support. Furthermore outside of confined urban areas it becomes harder to plug them. Open fields and deserts are probably scenery where the tank will still shine.
@@deevictrage-k8778 one t-90m destroyed, another captured in perfect conditions after the crew escaped. Russia is not sending them for the fear to loose them? Cause at this point is obvious that they are needed, and if are not sent are either not useful or not existing
@@solosamurai3365 dude only 12-13 have been destroyed stop reproducing propaganda. Yr sources are the Ukrainian ones who also say they killed 10000 Russian soldiers? lol only stupid guys like you believe this west shit info. Those Russian tanks (like the German one, leopard 2) made ISIS life's a living hell in Syria, they could not destroy them even with RPGs or anti tank missiles. What makes you think Ukrainians can do anything rather than cry for help in the west and propaganda.
Cough, cough, please pass me the up-graded Javelin and other ATMs that you haven't yet heard about. And no, they are not (yet) being used in Ukraine. Tanks are a waste of money and just toys for the boys. Tanks for the memories.
@@gustorel3041 Not funny at all, Ukies and NATO shills love to share gore stuff and laugh, showing their true faces once again. It's not funny laughing at either sides, but whatever, normies are gonna norm. The ammo storage is the reason why the turrets are flying off the tank.
Don't forget, T90 has a very good "Self-destruction mechanism", When it gets severely damaged, It's will blew up and didn't let the enemy any chance to captured it...
@@deevictrage-k8778unfortunately there are dozens pictures of T-90A being obliterated and even a recently deployed T-90M having its turret popped off too.
@@beans5762 read what I wrote. I said dozens T-90A. I know there's only 1 T-90M destroyed and after that very bad first impression, the Russian no longer deploys T-90M in the frontline.
Three months after this video was released it is obsolete. Ukrainian defenders using the Javelin missile against T-90s in the Russian invasion have aimed it to the left or right of the T-90 thereby defeating the Shtora defense suite. A number of T-90s have been destroyed as a result. One of the secondary results of Russia's Ukraine invasion will likely be a further reduction of Russia's already dismal export of military hardware.
@@servantofchrist2483 no one stupid enough to believe the russian propaganda and in fact you completely failed in Ukraine . Now you have nothing to do but crying like a baby lol . Poor pro-russia boys ?🤣🤣🤣
Oh boy, the Javelin can take out any tank as all tanks have a weak spot at the top, FYI idiot, the tank was proven and seen action in Syria and modified , now who lost more tanks?, Russia or Ukraine, the answer is Ukraine.
@shinji1264 if that thing is so advanced, them Bradley's should have been taken out a mile away. 25mm cannon vs what 105-125mm cannon on the Russian tank. It literally sat there and didn't respond to the shots at all.
@@Real_Crunkzilla lol easier said than done. What's a lot of ppl fail you understand is numbers wins wars. Not only that but tanks are obsolete proving that bigger isnt better. A modern army should consist of drones, apvs, manpads, lots of artillery and units such as himars to strike specific targets
@@shinji1264One, it was a 2v1, not a 3v1. Two, tanks are not useless. Look at a platforms strengths. Not its weaknesses. So long as a tank can perform a role that no other platform can, it is not obsolete. You just think they're obsolete because Russia sucks at using them. Armchair generalship at its finest.
@@bastikolaski8111 T90 is basically a T72 with a few upgrades. It has the same flaws. The T14 is newer, but they are scared of sending them in incase the Russian troops ditch them and do a runner lol, they don't have many. Though NLAWs and Javelins won't have any issues with them either.
And a 1 day life span... You think you can shoot down a tank and casually walk away ? They are always supported from all sides. The moment the javelin is shot and the position given up, that place would be pancaked to the ground instantly.
Yeah. So many pictures gathered by oryxspioenkop showing T-90A and even T-90M with their turrets popped. Russian tanks only do wonder in their brochures and biathlon (talk about which, its champion of 2021 biathlon was just recently obliterated in tank duel) Shtora and Arena APS couldn't do any jacksh*t in real life. Those who bought these pos should definitely ask for refund. They are being scammed super hard 😂
Congratulation!! You're able to attract Indian audience in the comment section without having the words "India" or "Indian" in your video title.
What? lol
@@Empriction comment below lol
Agreed lol....
Lmao
Yess
You forgot to mention India as a primary customer for the Tank, which operates over 2000 of them.
Also, Egypt bought some too.
Egypt bought the M1A2 Abrams too
I bet you’re wishing that India,hadn’t bought over 2,000 of these glorified T-72’s now? What a terrible waist of you’re nation’s money!!!!
@@mac2626 its isn't that great but its made in india and technology transfer has helped defense ecosystem of the country also they were upgraded with french night visions indegenious turrets tot and modifying designs are not something americans or germans would allow so the best option
@@mac2626 Why? The tank is still good, it's just that the thoroughly corrupt Russian army fails to maintain them properly along with bad planning and poor morale. The tech itself is just fine.
@@Maverrick2140 Those are T72 , Russia has kept all T-90 along with main brigade that protects kremlin in Moscow
Javelin: oh my .. look at that😍
Meanwhile Russian Sniper :- omg look at that guy holding Javelin🤡
@@sidk4696 Meanwhile A-10 Warthog :- omg look at that russian sniper in the snow😏😏
@@amogus7617 meanwhile S-400 :- Omg look at that slow A-10 🐷
@@amogus7617 zsu-23s on fucking trucks managed to shoot a-10s 😹
@@leonrothier6638 Meanwhile infantry :- nice truck bud😏
T-90 can throw off a turret very quickly and efficiently and turn itself into a convertible. This is its special feature.
Hardly the case for the T-90M variant
Actually India has 1657 t90 out of total 4300 tanks and under licensed production it is made in Tamil Nadu, India.
america might wanna buy/upgrade some lol
exactly
Russian designed and Indian made, no wonder nobody wants them.
@@Thiterest1 Russian designed ain’t too bad, but I can agree when it comes to Indian made
sctually the tank parts are made in russia and assembled in india. no hate
Dude India is the largest operator of t-90 outside Russia.
Including Russia
i am sorry for india but think positive, the pakistan tank is one of the worst in the world
Missed the largest operator of T 90, India Currently operates 2078 T-90S 'Bhishma' which were procured in three separate orders. Also most armor and active protection systems shown in the video are now replaced with much better systems and there is a remote controlled weapon station in the new version.
Update : (After the ukraine war situation, with out a effective Active protection systems & proper coordination between infantry effectiveness of T 90 is questionable.)
Yeah India was missed out lol
India and Egypt use large fleet of this tank
Iraq has around 80 T-90S and T-90SK tanks purchased in 2016
bro i have a question do india operated t90 have APS ?
@@over3429 yes
finally not biased video, keep up
The suckiest thing about all the T series of tanks, including all the versions of the T-90, is their awfully slow reverse speed.
Except T-84
Talks about the T-90 uses a lot of footage of the T-72b3 than of the T-90 and doesn't make any distinction between T-90 variants
Pretty sure we know how big a piece of junk these are now
Abramham tanks has only been used against third world poor countries were their only attacking equipment is old RPG's....so not a correct comparision smarty pants.
Besides, the Ukranians have recieved modern anti tank Javeline missiles, at that point it wont matter if its a T90 or an Abraham, both will get toasted. So thinkg before you start commenting next time.
@@servercookie6470 Wrong. Abrams (there's no h) crew can survive top attack, especially since the Javelin (note the spelling, again) is US made, they have obviously tested their own systems against each other. The rubbish Russian T-90, as we have seen in Ukraine, just cooks off and the crew are dead. Check your facts before being so cocky to others.
@@mauricetoussaint7283true but if the t90 slaps an abrams with an apfsds round its all over same for the abrams against the t90 thats what it comes down to but we might never witness that
And yet this thing was decimated by two American Bradley troop carriers.
Half of the footage is T-72B3 and B3 variants, I think I even saw some T-95 footage towards the former half of the video
"The M1A2 Abrams uses too much fuel! It's trash!" - Russian who cannot fuel his own tanks
Every tank is fantastic until you shoot it with an anti tank weapon in a place where the armor is not sufficient to stop it. The Javelin for example, would destroy any main battle tank around today, including the Abrams, T90's, Leopard 2's, etc. Impossible to add enough armor to the roof to stop one. Tanks are a very risky weapon in modern war, until there are reliable active countermeasures in place like the Israeli trophy system, anti tank weapons will always be able to stop them.
@@sexyitalian891 True. I would hate to be in a tank when there's javelin type weapons around. On the other hand it's not too much fun walking around in the open when an enemy tank takes aim at you either.
@@sexyitalian891 There a video by the UA-cam channel BattleOrder that does a fantastic job on discussing the tactics of weapons like the Javelin. They are not perfect. Tanks are still very useful. But my comment was only pointing out the common critique of the Abrams being a "gas-guzzler" and needing a robust supply line to be effective while it's claimed the T-72 and T-90 have no such weaknesses. It's clear now that the Russians have poor logistics and struggle to fuel their own tanks while the US has had no such trouble despite fielding the "inefficient, old, heavy, loud, and gas-guzzling" Abrams.
@@chaosXP3RT I don't think they struggle to fuel their vehicles it has a lot to do with the type of war being waged. They took an enormous amount of ground in the first days of the war so as to overwhelm and take as much territory as possible to consolidate with. The difference between Ukraine and Iraq is 1, Ukraine is 40% larger, and 2, its flat, and Russia is fighting against near parity in terms of technology. The Iraqi army and the insurgents in Iraq and Afganistan couldn't have hoped to be as well equipped or well trained as the Ukrainian army.
Needlessly shitting on a military because you disagree with the war does no good. Looking at it objectively we can see that on a modern battlefield, no conventional army would stand up well under the same circumstances. The battlefield has vastly changed since 20 years ago. Mobile phones with satellite internet connections, drones, etc, can all tell the positions of people, there's no hiding for any of the forces on the ground on either side. My point I'm trying to make is that if you put America in the same scenario trying to invade Ukraine as it is now, they'd be suffering a lot of the same setbacks and losses.
Their best M1 Tanks and Bradley IFV's would be turned into death capsules for the crews fighting against javelins and modern ATGM's. Any blitzkreig style warfare is going to leave vehicles unfueled. Support vehicles cannot keep up, its just not possible, they blitz, consolidate and move up logistics, establish chains, and continue.
On the modern battlefield, at least for no, anti tank weapons have far outpaced the tank. No tank, not the most advanced Abrams, T90, Leopard 2, etc, can resist modern anti tank weapons by an enemy resilient enough to use them.
Abrams is just slow boar nothing more and its so big its jsut an easy target it was only succesful since US used it against sandal boys
Apparently to defeat it you just need a bridge over a river. Then it becomes a submarine.
Or you just need one of the new Leopard 2As and you're good to go
Turns out all that ERA is useless against tandem warheads as well, who knew lmao
Lack of maintenance, and empty fuel tank, and mud can also defeat them.
There are addons for some tanks, at least NATO ones, that get screwed on top of the turret and allow the tanks to drive through meters of deep waters...looks funny...otherwise you need pioneer troops to make a makeshift bridge. Oh wait, and a fuckton of logistics I guess. Seems the Russians did forget about that. Given how the war progresses, this video doesnt seem to have aged so well, or not? ;-)
@@RetroAmateur1989 just like any tank.
And it goes up like a "jack in the box" just the same, taking the crew with it.
Common mistake it was not T-72BU. T-72BU existed only in blueprints. T-90 is in the basic Object 188.
Yeah . The video is not so good.
Still got destroyed in ua easily
@@nicolbolas8758 u think so ? :D
@@thakuranuraganand738 think? war in front of my eyes
@@nicolbolas8758 youtube ? :D
0:43 This image of a tank is a huge mistake on author's part in the video, as that isn't T-72BU, but a separate radically different rival tank project, called OBJECT 187 which wasn't selected as the winner of the tender.
so what should be then what else or how should they think
@@marutkumar46 what the fuck does that even say
Doesnt matter all russian tanks get fucked by ukraine!
@@Jimbeam1990 It does matter, as Object 187 was so ahead of its time, its technologies led to the 4th generation of tanks. All UkroNazis are getting fucked by Surovikin in ukraine and the popcorn 🍿 never tasted more sweeter, while watching all of U.S. vassals turned to fertilizer on tv and YT.
@@StefanBlagojevic You do know that u russians are the nazis xD
These are now call Jack-in-The-Box tanks
🤣
Orks toasters they said.. lol and smh...
Its because they are stupid how many abrams tank got blown up during wartime? Pretty sure maybe 1 and the others were friendly fire or mechanical failure if the US was operating these tanks the loss rate would be signifcantly lower as proven
US Bradley has entered the chat
It was two Bradleys and drone support against a single T-90M with destroyed optics but the tank was almost undamaged by the Bradley fire, the crew was fine and they needed a drone to finally destroy the abandoned tank. On the other hand, brandleys are among the most destroyed vehicles on the battlefield since they are not supposed to be used for direct combat but rather to support fire only.
@@Aaronreacher and yet here we are...
Bradley will be banned from war
since it is overpowered ;D
Completely missed T-90MS & T-90M, the latest variant.
When making such videos it is good also to talk about the disadvantages & weak points of the system under discussion as well.
It loses to Saint Javelin
its Russian made and therefore had no wekpoint.
@@Zoonjseur funny
@@illiasharenda3322did it hurt right ?
wow hit with a tow and emerged unscathed thats insane! those crew members must have had some headaches though.
Total BS... Ukrainians are taking them out with base RPGs...
@@shanehiggins4142 dude it was on camera did you not watch the video? they have reactive armor dude show me a T-90 defeated by a rpg on video that's what's BS a rpg wont even take out a modern T-72 lol maybe you mean javelins...
@@shanehiggins4142 No, ukranians aren't taking them out haha. You're falling for the propaganda, I'd suggest turning the tv off.
@@shanehiggins4142 Got some video proof of a RPG taking out a T90?
Maybe a T72...
@@shanehiggins4142
The Abrahams tank would smoke that thing
And the T-90 would smoke the ambrams, people just mistake ambrams is a fucking god, no it's only a tank and like all tanks it explode, the only giustification we use is "ThE aBrAms WhaS aLReADY uSED in ComBaT!1!1!"
Yeah used in gulf war against eraly cold war era
😂
Hi, i brought a Javelin to a fight 🤣
I'm sure a lot of countries are reevaluating their usage of Russian tanks after this month.
Oh yea, poland is replacing their soviet designed junk for abrams now
@@boom9256 Pretty sure them being with Nato automatically denies any military sales between Russia and Poland, so they couldn't buy Russian tanks even if they wanted to, no?
As tank's they're fine and are operating as a tank should. Tactical incompetence and poor logistics is what's making them look bad. Any tank, no matter what make will be a death trap without proper support and maintenance. It's been proven time and time again, since WWII yet some people have a hard time learning how to use them effectively and instead choose to use them for blunt force.
@Dkmasteris poland had t 72 from communist times, and they developed their own domestic variant. They are now phasing them out.
inform yourself. No T90 were destroyed in Ukraine, T72 were destroyed in Ukraine. The protection of T90 do a good job
St. Javelin turned this tank into essentially a death trap.
St. Javelin would turn most tanks into a death trap.
lol, it is TOW not Jave. Most of T90 can avoid Jave by Shtorna 1
that's info is based on CNN lmao !! in reality is the javelin anti tanks head a big failure against russian tanks . they needed to hit one tank two or three times for it to explode lol . plus the russian in couple of days made a big armor cage for the tanks that protected them from the jev and it did work pretty good lol
@@deathnote2526 bullshit lol
@@skdfdjkdfjkd yeah i know it's hard for Americans and some Europeans aka British to accept the truth lol . instead of calling it cap do some research use your brain and stop beleving whatever the Western media tells you !!!! peace out
well that didn't age well
because?
@@bastikolaski8111 St. Javelin
Why?
When I look at all the tanks in the world and I could pick one from whatever country, I probably would take the T80U. A beautiful machine
Tractor: hold my beer!😅😅
🤡
Poland just bought 1,000 K-2 black panthers from South Korea.
INDIA has 2000+ T-90
Exactly
Actually India has 1657 t90 out of total 4300 tanks
@@lordisback1947 no it's 1950's(something) and with 464 more T90MS on order.
T90MS is way more advance then our counterparts.
@@rajatdani619 1950 when you include the 464 t90 tanks and training and reserve ones also
@@lordisback1947 how?? Do u have any source?? Cause retired military Gen said we had 2000 of those.
Javelin and NLAW have signed in:
Russian MBT’s have left the chat:
Wow u don't know javelin so useless at Ukraine ?
@@Nbmstr2000 your mom did you wrong smoking crack when she was pregnant with you
@@Nbmstr2000 Based on what?
@@stabilis8895 the Tree Trunk 😹, Since Javelin was based on Infrared to lock-on but Somehow Russia used a Tree Log to conceal the Heat...and that’s why
proven in ukraine, 500-700 tanks were shot down. 80% of them were shot down by ex-soviet anti-tank guns. about 5 shots of javelin are seen in the network. about 60 of nlaw. but ukrainian propaganda makes western anti-tank guns seem like they work very well.
I was saving up for one of these as a daily driver, but with the current gas prices i think ill go for a kia kicanto instead.
Get a m4 sherman with a mine sweeper its my daily driver
this vid did not aged well
come on, it aged well, they are overall nice tanks, strong enough to take the entire Ukraine in less than a month, isn't that amazing?
@@strongindependentblackwoma1887 wait we are barely in the second week and saying Ukraine is taken over is bit of a overstatement lol
@@strongindependentblackwoma1887 you wish
Well it seems to eat javelins
A cheap tank that burns 🔥 pretty good from what hear of.
Skip the market BS and cut to the chase how does it hold up against a jav or nlaw?
No tank stands up to those threats well.
Maybe time for an updated video and retrospective seeing how these are toast?
10-15 t-90s were hit or captured. this is a normal loss for the t-90. despite its active use for almost 2 months
@@ka-52alligator39 Where are you getting your number of 10-15? There are 17 photo/video confirmed destroyed, damaged, or captured T-90s as of April 13, 2022. That is the absolute minimum and there are probably more. Check out Oryxspioenkop's list.
@@subverted only 1 loss of a T-90M tank so far, and at least over a hundred of these have been deployed to ukraine. In fact, this T-90M was scuttled by another Russian tank to prevent capture. Nobody claimed the T-90A was particularly good, it was merely a stopgap designed to be able to incorporate future upgrades just like the original M1 for the far better T-90M
@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here How are you defining "loss"? 🤣 At least two have been captured, two have been destroyed, and 3 more damaged just going off of the photo/video confirmed stuff.
@@subverted two destroyed? Lol good luck getting any evidence for the second one. And captured do not count, since these are not hull losses but rather have been simply abandoned by its crew
Apparantly Uralvagonzavod is running out of chips.
so what, they will take them out of their dishwashers and broadroasters. no problem
I've come from the future, this tank is actually shieet
As of 20 April 2024, Oryx blog had documented that Russia had lost at least 125 T-90s since the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (visually confirmed), including 38 T-90A (of which 25 were destroyed, 1 damaged, 2 abandoned, 10 captured), 1 T-90AK (1 captured), 8 T-90S (7 destroyed, 1 abandoned) and 78 T-90M (42 ...
Dinner for Bradley
Тебе с дивана виднее😅
Finally a non biased Video
I am highly sure that T-90 and T-72BU are two completely tank.
And now we see "famous" T-90s in fire 😂😂😂😂
It seems that the Russians would use the German-style wedge formation in a frontal attack. They would put (T-95S) T-14 Armata with its heavy armor in the middle and ahead of other tanks because it has the best capacity to absorb the anti-tank fire. Next to a couple of T-14's, there would be T-90's and even farther back and on the sides, there would be other tanks.
You are wrong! The Russians have long used fabrics as 125mm sniper rifles.
they support infantry advances with tanks or suppress fire positions.
And they have learned to do it superbly.
Today they use a technique - a tank carousel. I wouldn't want to be the opponent that this technique is used against.
@@juryfilatov4520 Nope. They use different tactic these days. Getting wrecked and cooked or abandoning and running away.
@@zbynekII Nonsense propaganda
@@Aden_III It is very usual for western propagandist. lol, Ukraine president is crying now.
@@KS-xo3oh and yet Russia is winning a harder battle than anything the USA has ever faced since WW2
USA usually just kills every living thing with massive air strikes before their delicate gender non binary troops tip toe in. Couldn't have them breaking a nail after all.
US already has this tank, they studied it it came to conclusion that this tank is a JOKE
this has not aged well ...
The only thing I see from the thumbnail is the Russians some how turned Johnny 5 from Short Circuit into a tank
First I was like why the hell everyone barking at him for Indian T90??
After the video iam too be like-- Hey u forgot India, India is the largest operator of T90 even more then that of Russia!!
Funfact-- India has been operating T90 even before Russia.🥂
How could u forget That!!🤧
the T-90 is a russian post-soviet tank, not indian. Just because india uses more of them then russia, (considering they bought them from russia) doesnt make them the inventors of it.
@@skibididopyesdop My bro u need to do some research Just Watch T90 Documentory..
After 1991 India helped Russia just like Soviet did for us in 1971.
Many projects were funded by India. Even some of them were never used by India.
Funfact-- Su30mki is also used By India even before Russian made it for themselves.
@@rajatdani619 shit i didn't know that
@@hmmmmn6770 yeah and you should not, as it is not fully true. T-90 was designed as Object 188 in the USSR without any indian involvement. So was original T-90 produced without any indian involvement. Only in 2001 India got formally involved as the country bought 310 T-90S "Bhishma" tanks. Most important novelity was the new welded turret, the development of which was funded at least partially by the indian order. This allowed the russians themselves to buy T-90As and market T-90SA / T-90. Yet, india had nothing to do with T-90 back in 1991.
@@rajatdani619 u expect us to believe that India designed T90 when India can’t even properly design the Arjun tank lmao
and guess what the Russian just abandoned this in Kharkiv
As we've seen not very powerful vs a slow propeller driven Turkish drone and handheld British NLAWs that turn each man into a mobile tank of his own.
All tanks are becoming obsolete, not just this one
@@slooob23 no tanks aren't gonna be obsolete. It's just that now we know that they aren't indestructible
@@slooob23 I get what you're saying. They'll be reduced in significance for sure. But they'll be around, especially for combined warfare offensive actions when they are, you know, actually covered by mechanized infantry and air support.
Furthermore outside of confined urban areas it becomes harder to plug them. Open fields and deserts are probably scenery where the tank will still shine.
@@randominus2641 Just like how cavalry hadn't became 'completely' obsolete all the way till early 19th century.
what about india ...india also use t 90
With the amount off popped t90a and t90m in Donbass it's safe to say that her turret is lit with fyre as usual because she's still just a upgraded T72
Those aren't T-90s, they are just regular T-72s...they haven't sent a single T-90 yet
@@deevictrage-k8778 one t-90m destroyed, another captured in perfect conditions after the crew escaped. Russia is not sending them for the fear to loose them? Cause at this point is obvious that they are needed, and if are not sent are either not useful or not existing
@@deevictrage-k8778 how many T-90 get fucked now?
How powerful is the Russian T90? Powerful enough to get complete disabled by a 25mm auto cannon...fucking joke
Tanks are great IF you control the air around them, last place I would want to be if the A10 is flying!
A lot of these tanks have been destroyed in Ukraine since the start of Russia's invasion last week.
Minimum of 12 destroyed or captured as of March 5, 2022
@@subverted Some Ukrainian farmers were having joyrides with these tanks on the field hehe
@@subverted Over 20... They are being taken out with base RPGs... They break down easily... Etc
@@solosamurai3365 dude only 12-13 have been destroyed stop reproducing propaganda. Yr sources are the Ukrainian ones who also say they killed 10000 Russian soldiers? lol only stupid guys like you believe this west shit info. Those Russian tanks (like the German one, leopard 2) made ISIS life's a living hell in Syria, they could not destroy them even with RPGs or anti tank missiles. What makes you think Ukrainians can do anything rather than cry for help in the west and propaganda.
@@shanehiggins4142 Yea it's propoganda, you dunno what's really happening there!
Cough, cough, please pass me the up-graded Javelin and other ATMs that you haven't yet heard about. And no, they are not (yet) being used in Ukraine.
Tanks are a waste of money and just toys for the boys.
Tanks for the memories.
Javelin - hold my beer...
Bayraktar says hi
bradley: really ❓🤣
These Tanks are seen destroyed across Ukraine by Mother's with Javelins.
Sure, and Iraq still has Weapons of Mass Destruction. You believe in UFO's too?
Yep, there are images of blown up Russian tanks and trucks all over Ukraine, especially around Kiev. They have no chance vs modern AT weapons.
@@BlatentlyFakeName but not of T90. The footage you see were russian or ukrainan T72.
Hello I am from the future to answer the question in the title. The T90, it turns out, is not very powerful
Main combat tank (MBT). nice abbreviation there
One thing you forgot which is very important. India 🇮🇳 operates more T90 tank after Russia.
and now that t90 is proving its abilities in ukraine, they are regretting their choice....
No ours are way more upgraded and powerful with best systems in worlds
No regrets... Its best tank of india
@@akashnag2645 its armor is too light, the systems... Well, for sure is better than having to use smartphones for communications and navigation
@@giancarloga8850 yaa.. But when u have israel and France systems in it... Then its like an iphone best in the market
Very poor information. India has more than 2000 T-90 MBT. Make it correct.
😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣 The T 90 is the world champion at the Turret Vault event, Javelins are sending T90s turrets to the sky 🤣🤣
I guess Russia found a more cost effective way of sending people to space.😂
10-15 t-90s were hit or captured. this is a normal loss for the t-90. despite its active use for almost 2 months
hahaha so funny, forgot to laugh.
@@pbluma Not so funny, but it's true.
@@gustorel3041 Not funny at all, Ukies and NATO shills love to share gore stuff and laugh, showing their true faces once again. It's not funny laughing at either sides, but whatever, normies are gonna norm. The ammo storage is the reason why the turrets are flying off the tank.
MBT :MAIN COMBAT TANK ::DRAGON CELTIQUE.
Well that t-90s not fared very well in Ukraine up against our javelin anti-tank missiles might just as well via 10 can
It’s not that bad out of the 2000 tank losses theydve had only 61 are t90
Don't forget, T90 has a very good "Self-destruction mechanism", When it gets severely damaged, It's will blew up and didn't let the enemy any chance to captured it...
One wonders why they are not in service and the reason may be that they don’t want them to look bad because they’re being sold abroad🎉😢
They're in service, being destroyed in Ukraine😏
The thumbnail variant of the tank looks like a beast.
India has 1600 operational and 450+ordered t90 tank
@Деревенщина из Сибири - Абакан ya then America javelin shock by russian tank with israel and france in it...illusion...indian t 90 bhishma
How did u miss T-90 Bhishma in India? That is like missing the elephant walking.
India manufactures these tanks under license and also operates over 1500 of these tanks
10mil usd each, easily defeated by a 0.2mil javelin
Or by 0,02mil NLAW
You think that's bad look at SAMs and MANPADS vs aircraft lol
no thats not truth
Light, reliable, portable & deadly infantry-carried scoot&shoot missiles, with 1000 meter range, make these awsome vehicles obsolete... Oooops!
The ones being used are the basic T-72s not T-90s
@@deevictrage-k8778unfortunately there are dozens pictures of T-90A being obliterated and even a recently deployed T-90M having its turret popped off too.
@@hardy2051 maybe they had set up some good traps to destroy such modern tanks, pretty sure they are being helped by someone else too
@@hardy2051 lmao what??? Only 1 t90 has been destroyed till now
@@beans5762 read what I wrote. I said dozens T-90A. I know there's only 1 T-90M destroyed and after that very bad first impression, the Russian no longer deploys T-90M in the frontline.
Three months after this video was released it is obsolete. Ukrainian defenders using the Javelin missile against T-90s in the Russian invasion have aimed it to the left or right of the T-90 thereby defeating the Shtora defense suite. A number of T-90s have been destroyed as a result. One of the secondary results of Russia's Ukraine invasion will likely be a further reduction of Russia's already dismal export of military hardware.
Shtora doesn't counter javelins by nature, something to to with their lock on to the tank.
Javelin are pieces of junk dude ,useless 😂😂 they are good only in cnn and other satanist western media (propaganda)
@@servantofchrist2483 didn’t relize you lost over a thousand tanks just because of Javelin ? 🤣🤣🤣
@@servantofchrist2483 no one stupid enough to believe the russian propaganda and in fact you completely failed in Ukraine . Now you have nothing to do but crying like a baby lol . Poor pro-russia boys ?🤣🤣🤣
Oh boy, the Javelin can take out any tank as all tanks have a weak spot at the top, FYI idiot, the tank was proven and seen action in Syria and modified , now who lost more tanks?, Russia or Ukraine, the answer is Ukraine.
Javelin Food.
lol but it got clapped by a 25mm bushmaster chain gun.
3v1 tho
@shinji1264 if that thing is so advanced, them Bradley's should have been taken out a mile away. 25mm cannon vs what 105-125mm cannon on the Russian tank. It literally sat there and didn't respond to the shots at all.
@@Real_Crunkzilla lol easier said than done. What's a lot of ppl fail you understand is numbers wins wars. Not only that but tanks are obsolete proving that bigger isnt better. A modern army should consist of drones, apvs, manpads, lots of artillery and units such as himars to strike specific targets
@@shinji1264 Only one Bradley
@@shinji1264One, it was a 2v1, not a 3v1.
Two, tanks are not useless. Look at a platforms strengths. Not its weaknesses. So long as a tank can perform a role that no other platform can, it is not obsolete. You just think they're obsolete because Russia sucks at using them. Armchair generalship at its finest.
A tank is only as powerful as its crews 🥳
Glorifies a terrible tank with weaknesses to grenades and drones.
What a waste of time.
And the Javelins and NLAWs are eating these poor T90s for breakfast. lol
@@lenini056 People from 3rd world nations don't know that, they keep sniffing Russian propaganda. It is laughable
Now everyone can see what shit it really is😂
Waiting for the T100 soldiers to come out
T90 Dumpster Fire...
what a monster. will wipe the floor with leopards and abrams
joke.
No but kornets and mines will and artillery
Except that the Shtora-1 countermeasure system is in fact crap.
Not working so well against those NLAWS and Javelins in Ukraine I see
Maybe it is fault of sunroof 🤣
they are workin well. No T90 were destroyed in Ukraine. In footage you see destroyed T72
@@bastikolaski8111 Care to edit your comment now?
@@mensax8054 this was right at the moment, so? And now destroyed six.
@@bastikolaski8111 agreed 💣💥☠⚰🇺🇦
Javelin and Nclaw join the group
These T-90s are fuel guzzlers don't forget, they only get about 3 miles to the NLAW.
Hahaha
Its so powerful....it can send anyone inside... to space ...along with the turret
No one can beat t-90 or its brother....t-72
Answer: it’s not
lmao
Real Answer: It's fine
(Any tank is vunerable to top attack weapons, and ambushs without infantry support).
Never heard a synthetic Texan voice before, almost got me yehaaaaaaaw 🤠
manhole covers from this tank fly farther than other Rusian tanks after a hit by anti-tank Ukr missiles? :D
Great target for the A10
Tunguska: hey food
No match for Bradley
The many vulnerabilities of this tank would be shown if it were in service and it’s not because they are being sold abroad
Well this didn't age well. Russia's tanks are getting trashed.
there is little information, there is more T72 in the video than T90. Not a word about the number of T90s in India. So-so video
Less powerful than a Ukranian with a disposable missile launcher and a day training
no. No T90 was destroyed until now. And many ukraine ATs were killed by T90
@@bastikolaski8111 T90 is basically a T72 with a few upgrades. It has the same flaws.
The T14 is newer, but they are scared of sending them in incase the Russian troops ditch them and do a runner lol, they don't have many. Though NLAWs and Javelins won't have any issues with them either.
And a 1 day life span... You think you can shoot down a tank and casually walk away ? They are always supported from all sides. The moment the javelin is shot and the position given up, that place would be pancaked to the ground instantly.
Yeah. So many pictures gathered by oryxspioenkop showing T-90A and even T-90M with their turrets popped. Russian tanks only do wonder in their brochures and biathlon (talk about which, its champion of 2021 biathlon was just recently obliterated in tank duel)
Shtora and Arena APS couldn't do any jacksh*t in real life. Those who bought these pos should definitely ask for refund. They are being scammed super hard 😂
@@hardy2051 no. The tanks do a good job