How Ukraine ‘battlefield taxis’ destroyed Russia’s best tank T-90M | War on Tape | Daily Mail
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
- How Ukraine ‘battlefield taxis’ destroyed Russia’s best tank T-90M | War on Tape | Daily Mail
Russia’s ‘best tank’, the T-90M, is designed to destroy other tanks. It should be more than capable of taking out a Bradley Infantry Vehicle, which is a battlefield taxi, designed to take troops in and out of the front. So, how did two Bradley tanks completely destroy a Russian T-90M? We’re going to analyse this battle captured on a drone camera, delve into the archives and speak to an expert to find out.
0:00 What you see here is an American Bradley tank take on Russia’s ‘best tank’
0:39 Breakdown of US Bradley tanks used by Ukraine and Russia’s T-90M
3:08 Ukraine Bradley tank vs Russia’s T-90M showdown
4:34 Ukrainian tank operators explain how they took on a T-90M
6:42 This is not the first time the Bradleys faced off against Soviet tanks
9:26 Military expert reacts to intense Ukraine Russia tank battle
12:10 Does Russia have enough experienced tank commanders?
15:17 How has tank warfare changed over the last 100 years?
17:19 Western armored vehicles vs Russian armored vehicles
18:33 If the West gives enough kit in time, ‘Ukraine will prevail’
#WarOnTape #DailyMailUkraine #UkraineWar #RussiaUkraine #t90 #bradley #tanks
Daily Mail Website: www.dailymail.co.uk
Daily Mail Facebook: / dailymail
Daily Mail IG: / dailymail
Daily Mail Snap: / daily-ma. .
Daily Mail Twitter: / mailonline
Daily Mail Pinterest: pinterest.co.uk/dailymail
Get the free Daily Mail mobile app: dailymail.co.uk/mobile - Розваги
What did you think about the episode? Leave your comments below!
This got debunked a very long time ago...
@@maryginger4877 Explain is it not real???
@@damonstewart70 Tell me, if the Russians claimed to have knocked out an Abrams or Challenger with a BMP - would you also believe that ?
@@maryginger4877 depends on the shells they used and the location of impact. Tanks have very vulnerable points. The main ones being the top & rear
@@maryginger4877 it wasn't really debunked. the title is misleading. the fact is that the Bradley was able to fight off this tank in direct close range combat. by blinding and deafening it's occupants, destroying its external sensors and optics, setting off its ERA and seemingly jamming its turret control mechanisms along with steering. this lead the tank to crash into a tree and remain still further suggesting the extensive amount of damage it received. shortly after a drone was sent as well, but there is no indication that the tank wasn't already out of action. the crew were able to escape but the tank was not recoverable which makes the claim that it was destroyed by the Bradley technically valid/plausible. it was certainly not "debunked."
The Bradley is not a battlefield taxi. It's an infantry fighting vehicle, meaning it's designed to stay on the front and support the troops.
Yeah the M113 is a battlefield taxi
Yeah and over 300 have been sent not 190. Sounds like this reporter is young and getting his info from Facebook mums.
If it's a taxi then surely it would be drove by an Indian
Not everyone has seen the movie obviously. Frasier and Men in Tights guy explained it all.
@@Bessskar / Middle Easterner! 😜
It seems the Bradley was better than some critics led us to believe.
It seems Russian army and Russian weapon are much worse than some “experts” led us to believe
It all depends, there are Bradley units being shot up every day as well, you may just not get to see it
Thank you for calling the Bradley what it is. Make no mistake, it's an absolute work horse and I love that this thing is still lighting up T-90s. But, let's remember that it's 40+ years old and exceeding what it was designed to do. So when I saw that video a few weeks back that 'Russians captured Bradley fighting vehicle!" ...my first thought is that's like a thief celebrating that they went out and stole an 83' Ford Taurus.
@@koki273 if our tanks hit ye then ye stay hit you hit us the crew walk away . orc tanks go boom ! if a fly hits them.........thats real junk nobody is buying them now......nobody, utter garbage like everything russian
Junk that whipped a T90 @@koki273
@@koki273Junk? Then what do you call orcistan's? 😂😂😂😂
T'inquiètes poulet..il n'en reste plus beaucoup des Bradley sur le champs de bataille...ce sont les russes qui gagnent villages après villages la guerre contre l'OTAN...et vos armes miracles vous pouvez vous les enfoncer profond dans votre cul
@@dinglebeeywat does that make a T90
It's not the "Brad"; calling it that does a disservice to General Omar Bradley. It's not a battlefield taxi. That's a reference to armored personnel carriers like the M113 whereas the Bradley is part of a combined arms doctrine. It doesn't have anti-tank "rockets"; they're TOW-II missiles. The 25mm does not remain, "locked on target"; It's gyro-stabilized. The most common version sent to Ukraine is the M2A2 ODS SA, an early 1990's variant.
This is the kind of journalist that tells you the "Bug in the system" came from Shakespeare. He never really researched it or he would know the bug was a moth block a connection. But the other version was in my textbook because they never researched it, just lazy.
Cool video though
Thank you. Yeah, everything about this video is pretty fast and loose. It's a fighting vehicle.
Gun FCS can track a target.
Dude. Soldiers who use them call them brads constantly. It’s a nickname, I’m sure the general would get over it
Wow, those soldiers in the Bradley sure have balls!
i will never have a sack as large as those guys thats for sure
The Bradley does have it's fair share of shortcomings. However the Ukies are resourceful and intelligent so they seem to be learning to play to it's strength now.
correct 100% they adapt and learn......only one winner here and its not the Russians the world is laughing at their kit
@@TalorcMacAllan-ig4rmThats why ukraine has a forced mobilization because they are running out of men? Does not sound resourceful.
Have you seen the bradleys, Abrams and Leopards taken out by cheap amazon drones?
@@TalorcMacAllan-ig4rmRussia is also adapting and becoming better. They made anti-drone armor and more. Yeah, world laughing at Russians equipment, while Russian AK-47 is the most produced gun in the history. Also they made T-72 that one of the most produced tanks in the history. Please, explain to me, how the hell Ukraine is winner??? Russia is coming farther and farther, while Ukraine is heroic retreating!
@@glebb..3416 Have you seen the shed tank getting obliterated by ukie drones of same size?
@@Vlad_Rudalev also the Ak-47 without upgrades and modifications is a piece of inaccurate dogshit.
I wonder if the drone was sending overhead footage to the Bradley which meant it could see the T90 but the T90 couldn't see the Bradley so it could manoeuvre into position.
yes, Ukrainian situational awareness and communication between different units much better.
In reality, the Bradley is waaaaaay more than a battle taxi. What surprised me is that they took down the T-90 without even using their TOW missiles. They must have been very well trained.
It's thrilling that you invite an expert that has actually been in the military and fought in wars.
Bradleys having a Party taxi ;-)
Uber-machina
This video is more then 6 months old and you are still making videos about it...
The sovereign Ukraine is more then 30 years old and Putin is still making a war about it...
wait for the movie.
Yet the both of you are still here watching it😢😂
😅i still find it silly that during Desert Storm they lost most vehicles due to friendly fire.
Russia must be using lada to build the t90m tanks.
Lada still exists? LOL
It seems like Putin's biggest screw up, is caring far less about the crews, than the equipment.
Have to remind people that the T34 was an American design from the Christie model 😅 so they didn't even think of that themselves 😂
The Bradley commander intuition of shootign the tank visions was a cognitive skill he learned from Warthudner.
I wonder why there is so few videos of the CV90? i have only seen one, so that seems to have been a bust.
they use them sparingly like the challengers.....western tanks are too heavy in rain etc so they use them from distance more effectively
cv90 is the same they wont waste them in case its major alert
This best assessment of a fighting armored vehicle comes from surviving, veteran crew members
In that much. Bradleys have earned their battle stars.
Sorry, you make it sound very dramatic, but 2nd Cav didn’t have anywhere near 1000 M1s
I feel like I'm learning all sorts of things about journalism and activism for Ukraine here.
The T90M got destroyed by drones not the Bradley. The Bradley fired nearly a 50 rounds and none penetrated. The turret ring got stuck because of shrapnel. Since the sensors and sights of the T90M got damaged, the crew decided to retreat. It was then hit by nearly a dozen artillery shells and 7 fpv drones and it only managed to damage it. The crew of the T90M got out with slight hearing loss but other than that, unscaved.
The T-34 was a successful tank of WW2, but by its end, the British Centurion was entering service, and was the best tank of the post -War era. It was used by the IDF to destroy a huge invasion by Syria in the 1973 Arab-Israeli war
yip
its always all about the soldier...we dont need to fear the Iwan
nice, informative clip btw
Y'all calling us Ivans, just like the nazi in WW2...
@@Vlad_Rudalev Everyone called you Ivans back then. But that is obsolete and too nice to be fair, you are just orcs
@@Vlad_RudalevNo matter the name, an orc is an orc. Get out of Ukraine. 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦
There are about 3,000 Bradleys still in long term storage. Meanwhile, it's replacement has been approved and pre-production prototypes go into testing next year.
Your Abrams numbers at 73 Easting are off by a large amount..........
Less than 1 minute in and already factual errors. "They've been given 190” - Incorrect, they've been given over 300 (Source: The US Department of State).
Perhaps you weren't aware US passed the Ukraine bill in April, that many had been waiting months for. Bradleys were included and were rushed over increased numbers from "over 200 to over 300".
Bradleys are Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs). They're made to fight tanks. Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs), like M113's and BMPs and BTRs are basically "Battlefield Taxis". Of a few things, the cannon and the fact that they're built to also carry ATGMs is the giveaway. The ones in this video didn't have or choose to use ATGMs.
Amazing
That little box on the side of a Bradley, holds tank killing toe missiles. Bradleys were made to hold their own against tanks
Russia's best tank taken out by a taxi. That just about sums up the orcs equipment. All hype and no substance.
Tanks are obsolete Bradley's or APCS are more valuable than medium and heavy tanks
@@shinji1264 Tell it to hundreds of thoudands of dead yellow & blue soldiers.
@@e-rgames7009 Believe what you want
@@shinji1264 losses come from both side. Undeniable truth
Most smart ukrop
In Iraq the Bradley was responsible for destroying more enemy tanks than the allied tanks did. As well as the two TOW in the launcher the Bradley has extra TOW missiles inside the vehicle and the launcher can be reloaded through a hatch behind the launcher.
Imagine the noise from being in that t90
Just like the so called best air defence in the world the s-300 and s-400s. All hype!!!
U mean patriot right?
@@zxuan1972 Keep reaching
like abrams and chalenger😂
@@koki273 How many Abrams and Challengers have been destroyed in Combat compared to T-Tanks? get a grip on reality Koki fella.
@@bremnersghost948thousands of Russian tanks have been destroyed.
No the active armor is not designed to deflect shells. Its designed to interuppt the jet from shaped charge projectiles.
A tank without infantry is a coffin.
Combined Arms Maneuvering will always defeat Human Wave tactics.
Unless spare parts run out before the enemy runs out of cannon fodder.
Its role as a "battlefield taxi" is secondary, its a Infantry Fighting Vehicle that does double duty as a Armored Personnel Carrier. It appears in some of these fights where a couple Bradley's are taking out tanks they are doing it with just their main gun and not even using their two anti tank missiles. In Iraq they took out more enemy tanks than the Abrams tanks did. The Swedish CV-90 IFV appears to be at least as deadly as the Bradley is as well. These two IFV's have been game changers for Ukraine, with I believe 300 more Bradley's either now there or on their way on top of the almost 200 they already had the Russians are going to be hating life.
I hope they aren't learning anything from this report.
Challengers are in theatre now. Best armour in the Biz.
awesome
If the Bradley had a TOW, it would have destroyed the T90.. they must have already used it
Unless there was brush or foliage in the way that could snag the wires and dump the missile
I thought the TOW had to have a circtem amount of distance? Maybe that is why
@@larryrobinson8556 TOW can be used at that range, after looking again you can see trees and foliage in the way. The TOW would have it's wire snagged and go erratic
Lone tanks get picked off. Tanks that miss 3 shots in a row get picked off also.
i am starting to notice the difference between a T72 and a T90 one pop's it's top the other spins it top silly design faults lol
great video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Its not a Taxi, and the Russian tank was being tracked by drones, and had no support. I am sure they were focused on the drones, and by the time they saw the Bradley they were shooting blind. T-90's are great tanks if they have the trained crew, proper protective armor and support they need. If you would have put an M1 or a Centurion in the same situation of taking fire from both drones, and a couple of IFV's with an inexperienced tank crew, you would probably end up with a blown tank. I have seen videos of successful Russian tank operations where they used t-72s behind a t-62 turtle tank, the difference is that they were supported by infantry, artillery, and helicopters. It was not the tank this time it was the tactics.
Experience of soldiers is something i feel is always lost in raports in most articles , and glad that Expert/ex tanker mentions it , poorly trained troops have very low battlefield value.
That is unfair😢
@6:04 era doesn’t explode when it’s on fire.
I got more info from the Ukrainian tanker than the “expert.” He added zero to the convo.
He’s been playing war thunder? 😂
How could it make it across the border in one piece
State of the art kit?
Don't you mean supposedly state of the art kit.
the poor Russian conscript looking through the t90ms thermals as the Bradley opens fire
It's because of the bush master gun that kicks azz
Ya but in the battle for 73 easting the Bradley's got almost all their kills with their tow missiles, if they only had chain guns it wouldn't have been so one sided
What was the WiFi password again!? 💥🤣
I swear I saw a hit right up the tanks main gun Oo I wonder why the Brad's didn't use the TOW, I'm assuming they were used up, or maybe they were simple too focused on what was already working. Either way, rock on ya mighty Kraine's!!
I heard they were even shooting at it with their HE and not AP, can anyone familiar with how impact works confirm this ?
vlad is embarrassed filmed beside the tall russian men at 9:12
Poor little Bunker Grandpa wants to rule the world, like the little Austrian painter.
Delamain Cab service.
Cuma mimpi kalo bisa menghancurkan tank T90M Rusia
That is one in a 500 case . 😂
T34 was designed and originally built designed in Ukraine
Yes but also, chief designer born in Yaroslavl.
It was designed by a Russian.
@@glebb..3416but originally built and designed on Ukraine
@@International_Corn Designed by a Russian engineer. Build in many countries including ukraine.
Ukraine was a part of the Soviet Union lmao , designed by a Russian and produced in all Soviet states, stop claiming credit.
but did you see how drone outtake bradley
The t-34 was created by Ukraine not russia
There were no sovereign Ukraine neither sovereign Russia at that moment.
There was USSR that included 15 soviet republics (like Ukrainian SSR, RFSSR, Kazakh SSR etc.)
@@user-qi2gq6ef3w that was then this is now
@@user-qi2gq6ef3w yes yes, but the point still stands. The T-34, and earlier tanks like the BT series, were designed and built in Kharkiv, in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, by a company that still exists today as a Ukrainian state company.
The tank was designed by a Russian engineer... The tank was produced in multiple countries. Why are you guys rewritting history lmao.
@@user-qi2gq6ef3w Finally someone who doesn't only recognize Russia as the former Soviet Union. Kids today always fail to acknowledge that the USSR was composed of multiple republics, not just Russia, the name Soviet "Union" wouldn't gonna make sense if its just a single republic.
& they say Video games aren't realistic simulators of war
Ender Wiggins.
Definetely is how you use it.
Örök vita az hogy kinek van jobb fegyvere☝️általában a csata kimenetelét nem az dönti el hogy kinek milyen fegyvere van😃 hanem az hogy kinek a kezében van☝️
Taking out old videos again due to no progress on ground😂?
It’s must be like in tarkov with unity engine for the T-90 gunner--) lot of artificial fog for hidding the global lack of quality
Poorly-Dailey Mail, Only but a month behind with old footage it's basically history now..🙈
12:12 This is where western doctrine has an edge. Yes Russia could absorb staggering casualties, yes China can field so much cheap equipment en-masse, but western doctrine and equipment values safety and survivability of troops and crew. Well trained crews are harder to recoup than material losses and may even be prohibitive or impossible during wartime.
Video games are easy to manipulate
A lot of words for one tank 😂 Advertisement for American Military Industry
Due to the very nasty habit of Russian tanks to kill their own crews then there is no doubt that Russia is very short of any kind of trained tank crews.... On the other hand Bradley and western tanks protect their crews very well, so the vehicle may be lost but the crew live to fight another day.
So... at the end Ukrainians tanks to their Bradleys has won the battle for Avdiivka, right?
Right?
Now that people was a Mexican standoff. 🇺🇦🇺🇸🇺🇦
Sure.
The West should stop sending Bradley’s! If taxi’s are sufficient they should send Mercedes W124 taxis instead…. They are the best taxi’s ever made.
Commander Hamish de Bretton-Gordon here shares his precious experiences. "Ukrainean skills are shockingly well." Thanks.
✌
War Thunder, that's why the Bradley won
ان كان قوة البرادلي مثلما تتكلم لمن السيطرة بارض الواقع كفاكم تمويه
❤🇺🇦
Can the US and Nato intercept the North Koreans deployment while in route to Russia? Can they establish a blockage to stop the deployment?
The DPRK and Russia border each other. North Korean forces will cross that border and take a train through Russia to the deployment area. So, nope, there won't be any interception en route -- not unless the US is inclined to target rail inside Russia; the chance of that is extremely close to zero.
Almost impossible unfortunately, but I really doubt NK will send much in terms of troops. The main issue should we the entire west stopping all tech flowing to this new alliance of China, Iran, Russia, NK, etc. We need to stop helping them in any and all ways.
@@cacogenicist Ukraine can and will though
@@TalorcMacAllan-ig4rm Why would they, the reports of DPRK troops being sent to Ukraine is false.
It didnt destroy the tank the explosions u see are the tanks era going off the tank ran over a mine got disabled then was destroyed by an fpv drone
The tracks were disabled by a drone or mine and then the armour was attacked by a drone before eventually having the same spot being melted by constant fire from the 2 Bradley's.
@@Yisraelamundas if the tracks were damaged it wouldn't have been moving at all. The Bradley's blinded it and neutralised it and a drone finisihed it off.
@@grorme2554 In a more zoomed in video, the tracks are damaged. The Tank is only able to move in circles and very barely forwards due to its bogies.
A drone clearly must have damaged it to stop it from moving so the Bradleys can get it easier, hence why the Bradleys were able to hit the same spot.
And when the Bradley weakened the armour (by shooting it so much, it melted) another drone came in and finished it.
@@Yisraelamundas clearly moving and not moving in circles. Erratic movement due to sensors destroyed.
Bushmaster is no joke!
Yeah you know in front of Russia, Ukraine is nothing without USA and European countries support 😅😅
And yet the Russians move forward
not really lmao
Up over fire shooting Bradley's impossible up over other way over fight
Thanks for keeping me uptodate on the war.
If you really think the T-34 was the best tank of WWII, look at how the T-34/85mm upgrade did against the M4/76mm EZ8 - directly from WWII - in Korea. Not very well. It did kill a lot of Chaffees though.
In Korea the nemesis for the T34/85 was more the M26 Pershing(and the upgraded variant M46) that was designed to fight Tiger and Panther in WW2.
Where are the Abrams? Leopard? Or challengers?
All western tanks failed in combat😂😂😂
And most important the russians are advancing all along frontline.
the vast majority is still in ukrainian service, unlike the russians t90s that get destroyed daily
Bro, russians are advancing like 2km per month, 5 km of frontline in the best case. 3% of ukraine taken in the last year and a half, bro, thats embarassing
Hey oaf. The BRADLEY doesn't have anti-tank "rockets" in its turret. Those are TOW missile launchers. Who was the simpleton who did the research?
TOW missile launchers aren't anti-tank missiles?
The Bradley renamed the Zelensky fascist Shish Kebab.
5:37 Certified War Thunder player. Years of grinding paid off.
Meep meep
This guy obviously has never played WoT or Warthunsder and it shows
lol. i heard the Bradley commander intuition from blocking its visions based form what he learned from Warthunder
its now requirement to have experience in WOT when joining Tank regiment in Ukraine.
All Soviet T34 were made in Kharkiv, Ukraine.