How and when should PET scans be used? What do they show?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 25

  • @roselucht4583
    @roselucht4583 2 місяці тому +2

    I had invasive lobular breast cancer and I also have Bcell Non Hodgkin’s lymphoma in my bone marrow . I just finished 4 courses of two kinds of Chemo therapy 4 weeks ago.
    Also diagnosed several years ago with congestive heart failure as I had SOB (ischemia) and thickening of my heart muscle. So in order to be cleared to have surgery (mastectomy) I needed tests of my heart. One of the tests my cardiologist ordered was a CT PET scan.
    My insurance just told me 6 months after the fact that test wasn’t needed and they won’t be covering the cost!! Help! Any suggestions?

  • @CristinaSB73
    @CristinaSB73 Рік тому +3

    What does no FDG avidity on a pet/ct scan mean?

  • @eoinc9511
    @eoinc9511 Рік тому +5

    I’m being advised to give my 3 year old daughter a PET scan , it’s for genetic information rather than anything to do with cancer.
    She has a rare genetic mutation and I’m extremely concerned about giving her radiation.
    I read that it’s basically the equivalent of 3 years worth of atmospheric radiation, which would mean that at age 3 she would be given her entire lifetime so far worth of radiation.
    Please help allay my fears, I would do this if her life was at risk but it’s not.

    • @HTUMyeloma
      @HTUMyeloma  Рік тому +1

      Hi! Please send us an email to support@healthtree.org, and our team will help you!

  • @vijyantmehrotra8119
    @vijyantmehrotra8119 Рік тому +1

    Very nicely explained dear

  • @bonniemoerdyk9809
    @bonniemoerdyk9809 2 роки тому +6

    Can PET scans be used to help diagnose other diseases like some Autoimmune diseases? I've had numerous medical problems for decades, with a lot of abnormal blood, urine, x-ray, ect. tests but never have been given a definite DX.

    • @micah7685
      @micah7685 2 роки тому +1

      The more ionizing radiation you let them exspose you to the worse your health will get. Permanent cell death and dna damage each ct and xray that is done. They are radiating the hell out of people with all this so called preventative and safe diagnostic imaging. Not worth it unless you are in the ER and affected and in a life and death situation

    • @bonniemoerdyk9809
      @bonniemoerdyk9809 2 роки тому +3

      @@micah7685 ! thank you so much! I keep putting off getting mammograms. I've had about 10 of them and quite a few chest x-rays....why keep pumping myself with dangerous stuff. They also want me to get another colonoscopy, I've had 3, and they were all fine. I'm so done with all that. Yep, preventative care has gone crazy!

    • @micah7685
      @micah7685 2 роки тому

      @@bonniemoerdyk9809 one ct scan destroyed my healthy gi function and endocrine system. They don't even warn you about the risks up front

  • @johnsjohnye8100
    @johnsjohnye8100 2 роки тому +3

    If the person undergoing PET SCAN, coughs or moves during the procedure then do we have to repeat the procedure...?

  • @danajo1234
    @danajo1234 2 роки тому +7

    Why are PetScans recommended before/AFTER RADIATION TREATMENTS within 3-4 months after?

    • @Alpha_7227
      @Alpha_7227 Рік тому +2

      I'm a public patient in Australia. I had a PET scan once they diagnosed my oesophageal cancer to see if it had spread to other organs but both my radiotherapy and chemotherapy oncologists said there is little value in redoing PET scans again, they can gauge what is going on by completing a CT scan of my chest and pelvic region. I also have routine bloods as I am undergoing immunotherapy. If I had private insurance I guess I could demand a PET scan.

  • @FabieDeGuzman
    @FabieDeGuzman 3 місяці тому +1

    Can a diabetic type 2 and high in cholesterol patient be pet scan or

  • @Mood_Gaming
    @Mood_Gaming Рік тому

    What radioisotope do you recommend for chronic low level infection like hepatitis c or HIV? zirconium? Gallium 67?

  • @diablominero
    @diablominero Рік тому +6

    The short half life doesn't make the radioactive isotope not dangerous. The low dose makes the radioactive isotope not dangerous. All else being equal, a substance with a shorter half life is more radioactive and therefore more dangerous. For example, iodine-131 has a half-life of 8 days and is used to deliberately damage the thyroid gland via radiation burns, whereas bismuth-209 has a half-life of 20 quintillion years and is used to kill bacteria by the oligodynamic effect with no need to worry about radiation.

  • @BobRiley
    @BobRiley 8 місяців тому +1

    Did you need to have a biopsy before you had a PPET scan

  • @bamaakavincent2055
    @bamaakavincent2055 2 роки тому +1

    Which detector is least to be used in pet imaging

  • @vijyantmehrotra8119
    @vijyantmehrotra8119 Рік тому

    I am 52 year old from India

  • @micah7685
    @micah7685 2 роки тому +8

    These are being ordered and reckomeded left and right and mostly in unnecessary situations. They are not worth the damage they do to your body

    • @luanharford4372
      @luanharford4372 2 роки тому

      When are they necessary?

    • @Alpha_7227
      @Alpha_7227 Рік тому +2

      Both my radiotherapy and chemotherapy oncologists said that there is little value in doing follow up PET scans after surgery or chemo/radiotherapy; a CT scan gives them enough information as well as routine bloods. By the way I don't have private health care in Australia, if I did my guess is I could demand it.

  • @BettyHamm-g8m
    @BettyHamm-g8m 2 місяці тому

    Well this is to much to keep taking these tests