I can't believe how quickly this has become routine. They've gone from a room full of loud woops and cheers to 3 people giving a couple of claps. Amazing.
It won't happen. Guarantee it. They just want to keep stringing you along with false hope. If they really had ever made it, and they are consistently going to Mars right now, the moon should be no problem. They should be able to duct tape an iPhone to the side of that stupid thing and send us back all kinds of amazing shots of the Earth from the Moon, but they never do. There's always some technical reason why they couldn't make it, even though they essentially live streamed the moon landing 50 freaking years ago. They are just giving you false hope, and then there will be some technical issue and they will string you all along for a few more years until they try again, and there's another technical issue. And if they do make it they will send you back, get ready for it, pictures of dirt and rock right in front of the lander, that you only will think is the moon because they tell you so. No shots of the lunar sky, no shots of the Earth from the Moon, just dirt and rock. Yay.
If it’s in space hauling butt to the moon what’s all the white particles at the end of the video and why are they floating in different directions at that speed??? Anyone have some insight?
With Artemis missions, NASA will land the first woman and first person of color on the Moon, using innovative technologies to explore more of the lunar surface than ever before. We will collaborate with commercial and international partners and establish the first long-term presence on the Moon. Then, we will use what we learn on and around the Moon to take the next giant leap: sending the first astronauts to Mars.
The guy doing the countdown is diluting the moment! SpaceX needs to hire one of those old guys who did for the space shuttle! You got to add some spice..
Fantastic! Let's look to the future! It feels so good that there is something positive on our planet. Putin and co... can continue to fight these shitty wars and drive their own country more and more to ruin. I am for the future, technology can solve everything! All the best for this mission!
@@xanderortega4359 I mean, it’s achievable but at that point of adding the ability to refuel/ rendezvous you would just build a stage that launches ontop of the heavy with fuel already on board. Apollo style/lunar rendezvous is still the best method we have for the moon
@@Cafaura the iss refuel from the spacecraft that docked with it to adjust and correct its orbit, maybe all we had to do was just add a module dedicated to store the fuel, just enough to boost the spacecraft to get to lunar orbit and back
They would run out of fuel. Wait, you believe the most efficient trajectory is just magically overhead/straight up? Why? You could learn (what am I thinking? learning is anathema to you 🤷♂️) that rocket-scientists don’t simply want to reach ‘space’; they can actually do that using much less fuel. What most rockets really want to do is enter the Earth’s ‘orbit’. A rocket must curve its trajectory post-launch, if it wants to enter the Earth’s orbit. If it didn’t do that and continued to go straight up, it would eventually reach a point where its fuel would run out and, most likely, it would end up plummeting back to Earth like a stone
Good thing I'm not 7 years old and know about the firmament or I would've believed this but rocket curves to avoid the firmament and then the camera switches so many times 😢
You are scientifically illiterate and enmired in conspiracy-poopvomit. Problem is, once you willingly joined that human-caterpillar mind-cult, there is probably no way out…
No, this is unmanned. It will be doing precursor work for the next human landing, which is presently scheduled for 2026. It won't surprise me if that slips though. The last human landing was, of course, in 1972.
My personal opinion is that probably all viewers of this video don't need to hear from a SpaceX spokesperson that is reading from a script and not doing that very well. She sounds nervous. We know what's going on..
I thought i had got away from the talking head that continues to state the obvious, Anyone point me in the direction of a site that does not insult your brain? please
it's not a real video. or rhey edited it for some other reason.. bit it's 100% edited. you can take a screen shot of the flame and make it brighter.. than its obvious what has been added to the video..
The launch is visible to thousands of people for hundreds of km in every direction (yes, I know you said 'or they edited it' but you kicked off with 'not real').I didn't personally see the launch, but I satellite spot. I catch a few every clear night, where they're predicted to be. I've done triangulation measurements ( via scale drawing, or using simple trig) with the help of friends or relatives a few hundred km away, and measured these object’s heights and groundspeeds - these always come out as hundreds of km and km per second respectively. I've caught a couple of the bigger, lower altitude ones (including the ISS) through my telescope and they look as expected. And, getting a bit more technical, I used a radio set and a directional antenna to follow the signals produced by several of them, across the sky, so they are definitely machines in communication with the ground. All the above is repeatable by anyone, has been many times. Don't take my word for it, go out and try it.
The launch is visible to thousands of people for hundreds of km in every direction. As for the satellites: I satellite spot. I catch a few every clear night, where they're predicted to be. I've done triangulation measurements ( via scale drawing, or using simple trig) with the help of friends or relatives a few hundred km away, and measured these object’s heights and groundpeeds - these always come out as hundreds of km and km per second respectively. I've caught a couple of the bigger, lower altitude ones (including the ISS) through my telescope and they look as expected. And, getting a bit more technical, I used a radio set and a directional antenna to follow the signals produced by several of them, across the sky, so they are definitely machines in communication with the ground. All the above is repeatable by anyone, has been many times. Don't take my word for it, go out and try it.
I can't believe how quickly this has become routine. They've gone from a room full of loud woops and cheers to 3 people giving a couple of claps. Amazing.
The same thing happened to the maned moon missions.
”There’s nothing routine about going to the moon I can vouch for that.”
Gets harder to muster enthusiasm for launching junk into the ocean
@@jacksonfurlong3757What junk is that?
@@jacksonfurlong3757 You failed to notice that the boosters do NOT go into the ocean? Where you been?
Falcon 9 is such an amazingly reliable rocket 🚀
What a game changer
Sadly, It'll be outdated in the next 10 years. Nasa is currently building a nuclear powered rocket engine.
@@kushmorejames8164 Nasa is useless.
Clear. Specially if you compare with starship
@@kushmorejames8164 everything has its time
This paved the way for for future tech
What will this do on the moon ?
Can't wait to watch the moon landing
Yeah, let's certainly hope this one has better luck than Peregrine or SLIM.
It won't happen. Guarantee it. They just want to keep stringing you along with false hope. If they really had ever made it, and they are consistently going to Mars right now, the moon should be no problem. They should be able to duct tape an iPhone to the side of that stupid thing and send us back all kinds of amazing shots of the Earth from the Moon, but they never do. There's always some technical reason why they couldn't make it, even though they essentially live streamed the moon landing 50 freaking years ago. They are just giving you false hope, and then there will be some technical issue and they will string you all along for a few more years until they try again, and there's another technical issue. And if they do make it they will send you back, get ready for it, pictures of dirt and rock right in front of the lander, that you only will think is the moon because they tell you so. No shots of the lunar sky, no shots of the Earth from the Moon, just dirt and rock. Yay.
Congratulations! ❤
If it’s in space hauling butt to the moon what’s all the white particles at the end of the video and why are they floating in different directions at that speed??? Anyone have some insight?
This is so exciting
I'm from Brazil Brasil 🇧🇷
Saludos desde Nuevo Laredo Tamaulipas Mexico, excelente articulo periodístico, gracias. 🙄😁🙂👍✌✊🤝🤝🤝☮♾🛡🏁
I wonder how proud Elon is about this particular launch. I can not even imagine the feeling. Legend
This is so exciting. Big fan of the Saturn V mission.
We still have many steps to take.
Beast engineering
With Artemis missions, NASA will land the first woman and first person of color on the Moon, using innovative technologies to explore more of the lunar surface than ever before. We will collaborate with commercial and international partners and establish the first long-term presence on the Moon. Then, we will use what we learn on and around the Moon to take the next giant leap: sending the first astronauts to Mars.
Whatt time will spac X landing on moon
The 22nd, there's a link in this video for the info
Is that a propellant leak at 8:21 ? (Top, of picture, jetting from the manifold thingy)
No. AFAIK, nominal behavior as per previous launches.
The guy doing the countdown is diluting the moment! SpaceX needs to hire one of those old guys who did for the space shuttle! You got to add some spice..
Space 99 tv series to startup again? This is awsome! watch out for Marvin on the moon.
I love old people.
Is this a 4 day moon flight path? Unlike the last attempt from Vulcan rocket?
Lander is expected to land on February 22nd!
Goooo SPACEX 🙌🙌🙌
Please make it
wath was it 3:57 ?
Bom dia a todos. Brasil
Why does it look like it's on fire?
Saw the booster come down. Was absolutely wicked
I’ve got to do that someday. The videos look amazing indeed. Those booms followed by the roar of those engines slowing it down. Incredible
It hit me on the head
Why is commenting so mute?😢
Fantastic! Let's look to the future! It feels so good that there is something positive on our planet. Putin and co... can continue to fight these shitty wars and drive their own country more and more to ruin. I am for the future, technology can solve everything! All the best for this mission!
Finally, the 1950s have begun!!
????
Godspeed
What cant they use falcon 9 on manned missions
Weight of payload is too much. Need a heavy lift Iauncher.
I don’t see why falcon heavy can’t do it though
@@Cafaura how refueling in space?
@@xanderortega4359 I mean, it’s achievable but at that point of adding the ability to refuel/ rendezvous you would just build a stage that launches ontop of the heavy with fuel already on board. Apollo style/lunar rendezvous is still the best method we have for the moon
@@Cafaura the iss refuel from the spacecraft that docked with it to adjust and correct its orbit, maybe all we had to do was just add a module dedicated to store the fuel, just enough to boost the spacecraft to get to lunar orbit and back
@@xanderortega4359 test this in KSP! Anything is possible
How come they can’t go stright up for very long? Oh cause there’s no outer space and we are covered by a firmament??
You’re scientifically illiterate.
Or because that's how orbits work
They would run out of fuel. Wait, you believe the most efficient trajectory is just magically overhead/straight up? Why? You could learn (what am I thinking? learning is anathema to you 🤷♂️) that rocket-scientists don’t simply want to reach ‘space’; they can actually do that using much less fuel. What most rockets really want to do is enter the Earth’s ‘orbit’. A rocket must curve its trajectory post-launch, if it wants to enter the Earth’s orbit. If it didn’t do that and continued to go straight up, it would eventually reach a point where its fuel would run out and, most likely, it would end up plummeting back to Earth like a stone
Play Kerbal Space Center it will make sense
🤦🏻♂️
Is this flight manned
No
🎉🎉😮
when moon?
Are semiconductor, submarine cables and communications satellites (LEO) made of silica sand? 🤭
?????? Explain the stupidity.
🎉🎉🎉
No soft landing on moon by traditional (for every action there is an equal amount of reaction).
You do understand the lander has its own engine, right?
@@odysseusrex5908The person you're replying to doesn't understand that, nor do they understand anything even remotely complicated.
@@party4keeps28 Yeah, probably, but I can never quash the old teaching instincts.
Good thing I'm not 7 years old and know about the firmament or I would've believed this but rocket curves to avoid the firmament and then the camera switches so many times 😢
You are proof our school system has failed you.
You are scientifically illiterate and enmired in conspiracy-poopvomit. Problem is, once you willingly joined that human-caterpillar mind-cult, there is probably no way out…
Are you trolling or really that uneducated? 😂
Doing what NASA couldn't.. . Apparently.
Yes, it's part of a nasa mission, but private funding
NASA didn’t send rockets? They didn’t go to the moon?
Once again, doing what NASA can’t.
NASA is part of this mission
Im confused, first human landing in 50 years ?.
When you're dumb everything is confusing.
No, this is unmanned. It will be doing precursor work for the next human landing, which is presently scheduled for 2026. It won't surprise me if that slips though. The last human landing was, of course, in 1972.
@@mikemars5984awww, he’s just pretending to be confused because he thinks the rhetoric is cute and ‘sarcastic’.
Plot-twist: He really is confused 😂
Fa ridere che dopo un certo punto va in orizzontale e non più in verticale Hahaha
Are you trolling or really that uneducated? ^^
My personal opinion is that probably all viewers of this video don't need to hear from a SpaceX spokesperson that is reading from a script and not doing that very well. She sounds nervous. We know what's going on..
Another UA-cam comments rocket scientist
I'm over it space x nasa all this shit needs shut down stop wasting all this money
They spend more on wars in other countries so why not spend on fireworks too 🎉🎉🎉
I thought i had got away from the talking head that continues to state the obvious, Anyone point me in the direction of a site that does not insult your brain? please
Try the Muppet show.
@@jackwood2328 It's time to play the music! It's time to light the lights!
you must be a delight at parties
(LUNR) NASDAQ 👀😁👌😎😉
😂
They claim they sent astronauts to moon in 1950. After 60 years they still struggling to send a rocket to the moon not even without astronauts.😂.
They claim they went to the bottom of the ocean (Challenger Deep) in 1960 in a homemade sub. But in 2023 they can’t reach the Titanic…
it's not a real video. or rhey edited it for some other reason.. bit it's 100% edited. you can take a screen shot of the flame and make it brighter.. than its obvious what has been added to the video..
You could literally see it here in Florida
@@richardwainwright507 i never said the launch was fake. said the video was edited..
You're a fool.
Learn how digital images work and you'll understand why.
The launch is visible to thousands of people for hundreds of km in every direction (yes, I know you said 'or they edited it' but you kicked off with 'not real').I didn't personally see the launch, but I satellite spot. I catch a few every clear night, where they're predicted to be. I've done triangulation measurements ( via scale drawing, or using simple trig) with the help of friends or relatives a few hundred km away, and measured these object’s heights and groundspeeds - these always come out as hundreds of km and km per second respectively. I've caught a couple of the bigger, lower altitude ones (including the ISS) through my telescope and they look as expected. And, getting a bit more technical, I used a radio set and a directional antenna to follow the signals produced by several of them, across the sky, so they are definitely machines in communication with the ground.
All the above is repeatable by anyone, has been many times. Don't take my word for it, go out and try it.
bullshit... video like this i make in a basement.
The launch is visible to thousands of people for hundreds of km in every direction. As for the satellites: I satellite spot. I catch a few every clear night, where they're predicted to be. I've done triangulation measurements ( via scale drawing, or using simple trig) with the help of friends or relatives a few hundred km away, and measured these object’s heights and groundpeeds - these always come out as hundreds of km and km per second respectively. I've caught a couple of the bigger, lower altitude ones (including the ISS) through my telescope and they look as expected. And, getting a bit more technical, I used a radio set and a directional antenna to follow the signals produced by several of them, across the sky, so they are definitely machines in communication with the ground.
All the above is repeatable by anyone, has been many times. Don't take my word for it, go out and try it.
And there it is Deniers Suk
You're a loser. Give the phone back to your mummy.
Go on then, show me.
Do please, by all means, post a few. Or even one?
Very racist company
Wtf?