Saturn 5 launched 6 times in 20 months, the last of which was a manned moon landing. That was 55 YEARS AGO. This was also the 6th launch of Super Heavy. It aborted and the only landing it will make it at the bottom of the ocean.
All 6 SolarFlares Launched At Earth, The Day Before Each StarShip Launch?🚀 🛡️ Geoengineering the skies with the MotherShip. 🚀 Shielding Out The SolarStorm 1st Launch 🌞💥 On April 19, 2023, there was a significant solar activity event, with a coronal mass ejection: -EarthSky
Why do some people always have to find fault, complain, and be negative? This was a test flight to gain data to improve for future missions. It was not a failure. Tax payer money was not used, private money is used. The booster being brought down in the gulf was a planned diversion. Some people just have to whine about anything and everything. I appreciate what they are doing.
It's not, this is actually quite late. The original contract was that the starship be ready for the moon early 2024. The project still has not recovered the starship, only the booster which is the easy part in this case, but if they would want to send something further than low earth orbit for example the moon, they would not be able to recover the booster in florida. They are not even close to being ready on time for Artemis and would need to launch rockets for the next 2 years just to accumulate the fuel in space (about 20 successful launches)
@gaypigeon5365 so im not sure where your getting your information (my guess is your ass) but the crewed TEST flight isnt scheduled till September 2025. Actual lunar landing is scheduled sept 2026. The booster is just that, a booster no matter where they are headed the booster will only be used to get the ship to orbit just as its has done and just as it is doing. So they will absolutely be able to catch it exactly as planned. And for the record Artemis 1 was successfully completed in 22 and the orion spacecraft unmaned has already orbited the moon....but keep making things up if youd like.
@@popularreject666 you do understand that landing on the moon will be donne during artemis iii in 2026 using the human landing system wich is a modified version of starship. You still need 20 rockets to bring the necessary fuel to send hls to the moon, this was calculated by destin sandlin (aka smaetereveryday on YT) a rocket engineer... Please continue using ad hominems to flatter your ego instead of doing basic reasearch. You would need 2 years worth of launches, then it should had started in september and we are reaching the end of november. At this rate, blue origin (backup to space x for hls) might be landing with people on the moon before spacex. If the mission doesent get another delay wich is quite plaussible since the nasa budget keeps getting cut.
Absolutely love all the hard work every single one of you that has anything to do with working on this project! Thank you for bringing the future into this generation
🛸👽WE ARE AMUSED DEAR EARTHLING . SOME OF OUR FELLOW INTERSTELLAR BRETHREN ARE GREEN 🧟 WITH ENVY THOUGH ... YES WE ALIENS HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOUR TOO . NarNoo NarNoo .
Booster catch was done last time and had to be called off this time. There is no vertical landing attempt of starship in this configuration until now. I wouldn't call it getting better.
@Hungary_0987 Booster went into the Gulf of Mexico, and the ship went into Indian Ocean. None of them "landed." Which is kind of a critical part of interplanetary missions. Out of 2 missions in this configuration, we have 1 booster catch and no ship landings yet. There will be no green flag for interplanetary missions until they manage to do that consistently.
Somehow i think we gona spent whole first half of this century to get these things right, similar like planes in 20th century, it took 50 years for them to become commercialised and used in a way we know it today. i believe by the time we are all super old lets say 2070/80/90, we gona have normal travel between earth, moon and mars. or maybe even that is to optimistic idk anymore
Once they manage to pull off the journey to Mars (with humans) a few times, i dont see why they couldnt start repeating the process Also, while they use the current process to go to Mars, they could be developing the orbital station to make it even easier for ships to come and go without actually going to earth
Technological capabilities are completely different than when we tried flying people for the first time like AI (machine learning), quantum computing, robotics and automation, 3D printing and manufacturing etc.. when we heard of Moore’s law (1965) for the first time, nobody would believe that 50% of the population in the US would have personal computers in their homes around 1997.. yet 10 years later we had an iPhone in our pockets that was even more powerful than that big box from 10 years earlier.. If you see where we are at right now (catching a rocket from 75km high) I don’t think you have to wait 50 years to jump in a rocket to explore the universe. If you are rich enough right now, I think you can even do it tomorrow tbh 😂
This is like watching a skyscraper landing vertically into the sea. I wish to be able to watch at lease one future launch in person. It will be awe inspiring.
Congrats to all involved. Sure is fascinating to see how far you all have come since the first venture into space. I was a kid when the first humans walked on the moon. I'm old now and won't live to see you complete a Mars mission but I have every confidence that you brilliant people will get the job done. Stay safe and don't give up!❤
The way Elon is exploring tech & space industry is ......amazing !! (Before I wasn't like him at all bt with these successful missions....i totally fanned him now') #keepGoinElon
People apparently don’t realize how close we actually are to making the Starship usable. It went all the way up to 26.500 km/h, to achieve a stable low earth orbit (LEO) it would only have needed to go about 28.000 km/h. So that means we are pretty damn close to harvest the fruits of Starships decade long development.
It actually did achieve an orbit, just not a very useful one. I think it was 208x50km after the in-space relight. Had the engine burned for 2-3 more seconds it would’ve been in an orbit that was stable for a little while
что бы разогнать ракету с 5 тысяч до 26 тысяч достаточно топлива и двигателей второй ступени . Топлива хватает еще и для торможения на последней стадии полета . Почему не используют топливо для более быстрого торможения при входе в атмосферу ? не обязательно до 5 тысяч, 10 тысяч тоже не даст так нагревать вторую ступень ?
No booster catch, no celebration for me, i just waited exclusively for that .... something went wrong, or they did not want to risk failure and then FAA backlash?
I don't understand it says the speed is around 4500km/h for the first 2 minutes and I can see it. Fighter jets fly at around 1800km/h I can hardly see them. Am I missing something?
Size, starship is huge. You can’t easily see a fly zipping around at 40km/h, but you can easily see a bus moving at 100km/h. It’s also far easier to track something that’s accelerating to that speed, than something that starts at that speed - the cameras follow it all the way from the ground, and they are *very* zoomed in. It’s certainly not easy to track rockets, or fighter jets, but it’s possible (source: I’ve taken pictures of both with zoom lenses)
Can anyone please help me in knowing what is that makes the space x rocket launchers different that they emit this kind of "fire", unlike other rocket launchers , in which visibile emitting is just fire...
If you're talking about the rocket exhaust, they're burning methane, as opposed to kerosene like the Falcon 9 and the Saturn V's first stage (basically jet fuel). Some rockets like the Space shuttle and the Delta IV Heavy burn Hydrogen which looks very clear, and some Chinese boosters burn hypergolic fuels, which burn very red/orange and are very toxic. There's also solid rocket boosters which burn aluminum and are ridiculously bright. The SLS launch a year ago lit up the night sky like it was daylight. I highly recommend watching some of these launches. Watch some failures too, there have been some serious fireworks over the years haha.
There was an explosion, but not much damage was done to the booster and it kept floating. It probably sank by now, but they'll definitely take it out of the water
You probably watched Nasaspaceflights coverage. Given how much negative press SpaceX gets undeservedly they probably can’t be bothered showing it for some low rate journalist to make clickbait out of
soft landing is really a good choice in terms of economy and effectiveness. really impressive, hope soon all the launching process will have the same trick applied.
Same reason North Korea always launches their ICBM's into the sea. There is something down there they are trying to kill that they aren't telling us about.
@ these are test vehicles, and as such are not proven to be safe. we know after the fifth flight test that booster catch is possible, so now the goal is to refine the process.
Weirdly enough after the explosion, the booster was still floating there in the gulf. I think the “explosion” was just rapidly vented gas. I had an eyewitness account btw.
I think Starship 7's launch was successfu, They can now catch and land the booster and Starship next lunch for sure. By the look of it, it splashed in the ocean very smoothly. 💪💪❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸
Yeah, not really. Booster catch failed no matter what the reason is. And we are yet to see starship vertical landing in this configuration, which is the most important part of future missions.
To me it looked like they ran out of fuel. Lady says the back burn is supposed to last 30 seconds and as soon as she says that, the engines cut out. They realize they can't make it back to the tower so they land in the ocean.
@@slvrcobra1337you do realise that there is a delay between commentary and pictures don’t you? You could tell that when the ground crew started counting down and it wasn’t in sync with the countdown on screen
@@MiniLemmy That was about a four second delay, and even if it got worse over time, the back burn or whatever only lasted like 40 seconds total, way less than the "over a minute" she said it would take. Now, it's possible something on the ground happened and they just aborted on the spot, but those fuel levels looked insanely low and IIRC they've had consistent problems with that.
"Failures" for rocketry are unavoidable. They lead to further study and eventual breakthroughs for those willing to move forward after failure, same as with everything worthwhile in life. Incredible stuff, and I hope schools all over the US and Canada took time out from teaching kids about gender fluidity to have them watch this inspiring history and technological wonderment.
Cooperation between SpaceX and Roscosmos is needed. The first got super heavy rocket, the second develops nuclear-powered towing vessel. SpaceX would deliver 150 tons of payload to orbit, Roscosmos would drag it to Moon, to Mars etc. "Dreams, dreams, dreams")
Use to be years between significant space launches. Now it seems like just another launch this week. Still very cool to watch.
3 in last 3 days
just another crash
That's what happens when the government isn't running the program.
5:18 on the right side of earth where space begins, you see movement of something.
Saturn 5 launched 6 times in 20 months, the last of which was a manned moon landing.
That was 55 YEARS AGO.
This was also the 6th launch of Super Heavy.
It aborted and the only landing it will make it at the bottom of the ocean.
All 6 Starship launches:
• Starship 1: April 20, 2023
• Starship 2: November 18, 2023
• Starship 3: March 14, 2024
• Starship 4: June 6, 2024
• Starship 5: October 13, 2024
• Starship 6: November 19, 2024
all for one year💀
This is absolute fast pace. Watching this feels almighty and terrify at the same time.
All 6 SolarFlares Launched At Earth, The Day Before Each StarShip Launch?🚀 🛡️ Geoengineering the skies with the MotherShip. 🚀 Shielding Out The SolarStorm
1st Launch 🌞💥 On April 19, 2023, there was a significant solar activity event, with a coronal mass ejection: -EarthSky
Starship 7: November 20,2024
@@tgmtf5963 No it was Starship 6. In which world do you live btw?
Why do some people always have to find fault, complain, and be negative? This was a test flight to gain data to improve for future missions. It was not a failure. Tax payer money was not used, private money is used. The booster being brought down in the gulf was a planned diversion. Some people just have to whine about anything and everything. I appreciate what they are doing.
jelousy deep inside
its something they will never achieve in their lifetime
Amen.
because people are restarted
because it hurts the planet for the no reason focus on aliens we dont need this outdated shit this does nothing for the world
Jealousy 💯
For what's only their 6th flight with Ship is an incredible achievement! Bravo SpaceX! 👏
This is a Phenomenal Momentum!!!!!
It's not, this is actually quite late. The original contract was that the starship be ready for the moon early 2024. The project still has not recovered the starship, only the booster which is the easy part in this case, but if they would want to send something further than low earth orbit for example the moon, they would not be able to recover the booster in florida. They are not even close to being ready on time for Artemis and would need to launch rockets for the next 2 years just to accumulate the fuel in space (about 20 successful launches)
@gaypigeon5365 so im not sure where your getting your information (my guess is your ass) but the crewed TEST flight isnt scheduled till September 2025. Actual lunar landing is scheduled sept 2026.
The booster is just that, a booster no matter where they are headed the booster will only be used to get the ship to orbit just as its has done and just as it is doing. So they will absolutely be able to catch it exactly as planned. And for the record Artemis 1 was successfully completed in 22 and the orion spacecraft unmaned has already orbited the moon....but keep making things up if youd like.
@gaypigeon5365 Sucks that the government is stopping their progress at every corner out of spite. Now they'll be able to make some real progress.
@@popularreject666 you do understand that landing on the moon will be donne during artemis iii in 2026 using the human landing system wich is a modified version of starship. You still need 20 rockets to bring the necessary fuel to send hls to the moon, this was calculated by destin sandlin (aka smaetereveryday on YT) a rocket engineer... Please continue using ad hominems to flatter your ego instead of doing basic reasearch. You would need 2 years worth of launches, then it should had started in september and we are reaching the end of november. At this rate, blue origin (backup to space x for hls) might be landing with people on the moon before spacex. If the mission doesent get another delay wich is quite plaussible since the nasa budget keeps getting cut.
@@Banana_Jesus_the government? I think the exploding vehicles are hampering progress.
That connecting ring (hot staging) has to work so hard! It must be a real work of art in mechanical engineering.
when the splash down is so smooth that there is no splash
Because they cut the part where it went boooom 💥 😂😂😂😂
@@irvinclemente2368 what do you mean, they cut it before splashdown to another camera as it went kabooom
Wow, I'm totally speechless watching all the magnificent......
Brilliant mission! Starship team, thanks for the 6th launch!!🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
The "payload" was too heavy and the booster did not have enough fuel to make it back for the catch/landing
I knew it! It's the damn banana!
❤
It was a toy, so this thing still can't reach LEO even when completely empty? That's...not very impressive, is it?
@@braindecay9477bro didnt catch the sarcasm 😂
Its a damn prototype bro, do better!
man they cut the booster camera too soon
GO SpaceX and Elon! USA!!
7:47 They cut the explosion part.
Yes, very Soviet of them.
Absolutely love all the hard work every single one of you that has anything to do with working on this project! Thank you for bringing the future into this generation
Totally amazing!
Aliens are like damn these guys are getting btr and btr 😂
🛸👽WE ARE AMUSED DEAR EARTHLING . SOME OF OUR FELLOW INTERSTELLAR BRETHREN ARE GREEN 🧟 WITH ENVY THOUGH ... YES WE ALIENS HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOUR TOO . NarNoo NarNoo .
Booster catch was done last time and had to be called off this time. There is no vertical landing attempt of starship in this configuration until now. I wouldn't call it getting better.
@@amitpatilamityes there is vertical ship landing, what are you talking about?
@Hungary_0987 Booster went into the Gulf of Mexico, and the ship went into Indian Ocean. None of them "landed." Which is kind of a critical part of interplanetary missions. Out of 2 missions in this configuration, we have 1 booster catch and no ship landings yet. There will be no green flag for interplanetary missions until they manage to do that consistently.
Nahh, aliens are like, why are these stupid Earthlings still burning fuel? Don't they realize that they are destroying their own planet?
It would be nice to know what happened with the booster
Wind?? Lol
It went kaboom in the ocean, if they can't land it safely they have to blow it up or risk recovering a ticking time bomb.
@@Pigeon_BirbWhy is recovering it from the water any more dangerous than catching it with a giant tower?
It went KABOOM
Somehow i think we gona spent whole first half of this century to get these things right, similar like planes in 20th century, it took 50 years for them to become commercialised and used in a way we know it today. i believe by the time we are all super old lets say 2070/80/90, we gona have normal travel between earth, moon and mars. or maybe even that is to optimistic idk anymore
Once they manage to pull off the journey to Mars (with humans) a few times, i dont see why they couldnt start repeating the process
Also, while they use the current process to go to Mars, they could be developing the orbital station to make it even easier for ships to come and go without actually going to earth
Technological capabilities are completely different than when we tried flying people for the first time like AI (machine learning), quantum computing, robotics and automation, 3D printing and manufacturing etc.. when we heard of Moore’s law (1965) for the first time, nobody would believe that 50% of the population in the US would have personal computers in their homes around 1997.. yet 10 years later we had an iPhone in our pockets that was even more powerful than that big box from 10 years earlier..
If you see where we are at right now (catching a rocket from 75km high) I don’t think you have to wait 50 years to jump in a rocket to explore the universe. If you are rich enough right now, I think you can even do it tomorrow tbh 😂
This is like watching a skyscraper landing vertically into the sea. I wish to be able to watch at lease one future launch in person. It will be awe inspiring.
Beautiful landing! Congratulations Elon! Congratulations Space team!
It exploded 😂😂😂
Guess nobody noticed the booster behind starship after it was already supposed to have splashed down
What do you mean? Timestamp?
Congratulations to Space-X and Elon Musk.
Congrats to all involved. Sure is fascinating to see how far you all have come since the first venture into space. I was a kid when the first humans walked on the moon. I'm old now and won't live to see you complete a Mars mission but I have every confidence that you brilliant people will get the job done. Stay safe and don't give up!❤
It would be amazing to see this live
I live on SPI..seen all 6 live.. it's mid...
@panaderofilms I'm from Australia so I don't know what SPI is or mid,for that matter.
We are still in the dark ages using a full word to explain
You can’t because it’s bullshit...no ones in space no ones ever been in space..it’s all cgi, camera manipulation.
@@NigelBiddell basically he is saying he lives at south padre island and the rocket launch was whatever
@WembyismyGoat thanks I'm not hip with the libs.its probably my natural hair colour
Elon has geniuses working for him
And they can’t stand him
@@SamWilkinsonn just like your mom can't stand you.
@@MyDemon32 why are right wingers all painfully unfunny?
@@MyDemon32 Why are you mad? He's right. Elon is an awkward loser.
More succesfull then you will ever be keep coping @ImpreccablePony
Nuclear like explosion of booster was crazy 😅
The way Elon is exploring tech & space industry is ......amazing !! (Before I wasn't like him at all bt with these successful missions....i totally fanned him now') #keepGoinElon
A few errors. Totally understand.🌼
Bravo Elon and the whole team!!!!
❤Lovely. Make America Great again from malaysia
Why did booster speed increase from zero to 100 km/h as the booster toppled over into the sea?
The GPS must have been at the top of the booster, and as it tipped over, the top accelerated.
Elon smoking a nice blunt with Joe Rogan rn and watching his rocket land
Did they just censored the explosion
People apparently don’t realize how close we actually are to making the Starship usable. It went all the way up to 26.500 km/h, to achieve a stable low earth orbit (LEO) it would only have needed to go about 28.000 km/h. So that means we are pretty damn close to harvest the fruits of Starships decade long development.
It actually did achieve an orbit, just not a very useful one. I think it was 208x50km after the in-space relight. Had the engine burned for 2-3 more seconds it would’ve been in an orbit that was stable for a little while
5:15 right side of screen.. what is this?
Is this a rerun?
No
It was a delight to meet you!
что бы разогнать ракету с 5 тысяч до 26 тысяч достаточно топлива и двигателей второй ступени . Топлива хватает еще и для торможения на последней стадии полета . Почему не используют топливо для более быстрого торможения при входе в атмосферу ? не обязательно до 5 тысяч, 10 тысяч тоже не даст так нагревать вторую ступень ?
You need a lot more fuel for that.
Are we there yet? LFG!!
Nowhere nearly there yet, unfortunately.
No booster catch, no celebration for me, i just waited exclusively for that .... something went wrong, or they did not want to risk failure and then FAA backlash?
It's not about Backlash or anything, cause we know Elon, he doesn't care about it . I think something really went wrong but it's all right, next time
There was a problem in the tower - they didn’t want to risk any costly loss of equipment
[Wild guess] i think they used too much fuel on ascent. Shortened boostback burn to still allow for a water landing.
Comms issue with tower was the cause of the abort
7:31 splashdown to be just looked on IFT 4
how do people believe the earth is flat? it’s clearly not
Oh no. Here they come. Let’s troll the flat earthers lol.😂
Great Launch
I don't understand it says the speed is around 4500km/h for the first 2 minutes and I can see it. Fighter jets fly at around 1800km/h I can hardly see them. Am I missing something?
Size, starship is huge. You can’t easily see a fly zipping around at 40km/h, but you can easily see a bus moving at 100km/h.
It’s also far easier to track something that’s accelerating to that speed, than something that starts at that speed - the cameras follow it all the way from the ground, and they are *very* zoomed in. It’s certainly not easy to track rockets, or fighter jets, but it’s possible (source: I’ve taken pictures of both with zoom lenses)
this is amazing😄
Did something happened to tower 1 during launch?
Yes.
Does anybody have the entire schedule for the next year,in boca raton Texas?
No
Imagine the explosion of the whole base if they said "fuck it, try to catch anyway"
As i was saying only the sitting people dont make mistake .Congrats SpaceX
Flat earthers in denial - 3 minutes 52 seconds...
Awesome job they will get this figured out in no time onto the next
If anything wrong with the booster landing why don't u use a of course i still love you water platform to second catch try ?
Why splash down rather than catching? Anybody please
It was a call from the tower - they didn’t want to take any risks on a decision that could possibly lead to equipment loss
good call to call off the catch
Why take-off form one place and landing different place?
Congratulations Elon and SpaceX team! Truly amazing accomplishment...oh to be there!!
Can anyone please help me in knowing what is that makes the space x rocket launchers different that they emit this kind of "fire", unlike other rocket launchers , in which visibile emitting is just fire...
If you're talking about the rocket exhaust, they're burning methane, as opposed to kerosene like the Falcon 9 and the Saturn V's first stage (basically jet fuel). Some rockets like the Space shuttle and the Delta IV Heavy burn Hydrogen which looks very clear, and some Chinese boosters burn hypergolic fuels, which burn very red/orange and are very toxic.
There's also solid rocket boosters which burn aluminum and are ridiculously bright. The SLS launch a year ago lit up the night sky like it was daylight. I highly recommend watching some of these launches. Watch some failures too, there have been some serious fireworks over the years haha.
This is Gattaca
Didn't know in Florida.I could hear it couldn't see it
Does anyone know what happened to the booster after it landed in the Gulf of Mexico? Was it sunk? Did it explode? Or was it pulled ashore?
There was an explosion, but not much damage was done to the booster and it kept floating. It probably sank by now, but they'll definitely take it out of the water
7:41 the reporter 😂😂
How do the engines survive going from lit to wet in seconds?
Because they’re made of metal
Misleading cover picture.
When does it hit the firmament?
Never, there is none.
Do anyone get chills when you see them space ships take off man I would love to go up there 😢
So how did I watch the booster explode shortly after water landing yesterday and this clip doesn't show it or even mention it????
You probably watched Nasaspaceflights coverage. Given how much negative press SpaceX gets undeservedly they probably can’t be bothered showing it for some low rate journalist to make clickbait out of
It never exploded
This thing didn’t go anywhere? Just up then down? Not even to ISS?
It’s a test that flew to the Indian Ocean.
7:39 SpaceX showed the landing but cut away before it fell over and exploded in a spectacular fireball.
soft landing is really a good choice in terms of economy and effectiveness. really impressive, hope soon all the launching process will have the same trick applied.
Awesome 👏 👏👏🇺🇸❤️
why do they keep crashing these in the sea?
Same reason North Korea always launches their ICBM's into the sea. There is something down there they are trying to kill that they aren't telling us about.
better than crashing on land and destroying property or, worse, killing people
@@reardenbentley9622 but why do it again and again, wisent the idea to land it
@ these are test vehicles, and as such are not proven to be safe. we know after the fifth flight test that booster catch is possible, so now the goal is to refine the process.
@@Nobody-Nowhere so all the material isnt destroyed every scratch and bump or discoloration anywhere gives information
Best thing about space launch is joining in the count
They deleted the explosion. Shame
Weirdly enough after the explosion, the booster was still floating there in the gulf. I think the “explosion” was just rapidly vented gas. I had an eyewitness account btw.
Did you all see that at 4:33
With much appreciation ❤.
If you plan on going to Mars, better be testing this with double fuel capacity.
UFO just flew through at 6:31 to 6:32. They must have these on radar.
Not sure you can see a video data glitch on radar.
I think Starship 7's launch was successfu, They can now catch and land the booster and Starship next lunch for sure. By the look of it, it splashed in the ocean very smoothly. 💪💪❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸
Then exploded.
Yeah, not really. Booster catch failed no matter what the reason is. And we are yet to see starship vertical landing in this configuration, which is the most important part of future missions.
where is it going?
Test flight only - no destination yet apart from landing zone and landing zone alternate
I wonder what catch criteria failed...
The weather was outside of docking parameters. That was stated in the clip.
To me it looked like they ran out of fuel. Lady says the back burn is supposed to last 30 seconds and as soon as she says that, the engines cut out. They realize they can't make it back to the tower so they land in the ocean.
@@slvrcobra1337you do realise that there is a delay between commentary and pictures don’t you? You could tell that when the ground crew started counting down and it wasn’t in sync with the countdown on screen
Tower had a few problems caused by the launch
@@MiniLemmy That was about a four second delay, and even if it got worse over time, the back burn or whatever only lasted like 40 seconds total, way less than the "over a minute" she said it would take.
Now, it's possible something on the ground happened and they just aborted on the spot, but those fuel levels looked insanely low and IIRC they've had consistent problems with that.
Why the booster was not catch by the tower... What the meaning landing on land, is that suppossed to be... Very sad...
Absolutely amazing.
Congratulations 🚀👌😁great job, fantastic video material.
Hello from Louisville KY 💕
This is a very Amazing expérience ever... congratulations to spacex team and its Boss
Only 50 km/h loss during hot staging. Looks like record.
It will be a small thing to add a Parachoot on starship to maybe be reusable. Boosters are perfected
Parachutes can’t sufficiently slow down a booster of this size, and salt water corrosion would significantly impair starship’s ability to re-fly
7:48 you can see the real spash...
"Failures" for rocketry are unavoidable. They lead to further study and eventual breakthroughs for those willing to move forward after failure, same as with everything worthwhile in life. Incredible stuff, and I hope schools all over the US and Canada took time out from teaching kids about gender fluidity to have them watch this inspiring history and technological wonderment.
Deceleration is brutal.
Thank you 🙏 🦋🌈✨🕊️🚀
Why the hell it's day time and the sky is dark🤔🤔🤔
God bless Elen Musk and all the people working tirelessly, so hard to make this happens.
Fantastic elon
He didn't do anything lol, it's the engineers who do the work. All he does is tweet.
Where is the mouse
fish eyes everywhere
Haven't seen a single fish in the video, what are you talking about?
@ about you
BROWNSVILLE TEJAS | CAMERON COUNTY.... AREA HAS AWESOME HISTORIC WESTERN COWBOY SOLDIERS TX AVENUES .....
Cooperation between SpaceX and Roscosmos is needed. The first got super heavy rocket, the second develops nuclear-powered towing vessel. SpaceX would deliver 150 tons of payload to orbit, Roscosmos would drag it to Moon, to Mars etc. "Dreams, dreams, dreams")
Thankyou
It was extraordinaire .🐚💪🏽