Beethoven's Unfinished Piano Concerto no. 6 in D major (Unv 6/Hess15): the ultimate completion

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 кві 2021
  • For score and more info:
    ceesnieuwenhuizen.com/project...
    Beethoven wrote 256 bars of the Sixth Piano Concerto, spread over 30 pages. The handwritten version of this is kept in the Berlin State Library. In addition, there are 114 pages of separate sketches preserved in various other libraries. For more than 5 years Cees Nieuwenhuizen studied detailed digital copies of all these scores and sketches to get a complete picture of the material. The sketches and the scores are interesting and extensive.
    The score, as Beethoven left it to us, is not a musical reduction but rather a rough ‘concept’. Beethoven made such concepts at a very early stage, capturing the most important information about the entire part: key, modulation, form, dramatic twists, solo parts etc. Such a rough concept cannot be turned into a playing version without a proper degree of additional input, it needs some ‘additional’ composing. Therefore, we prefer not to speak about a ‘reconstruction’, but rather about a ‘playable work based on material from Beethoven’. All of Beethoven’s material is used unaltered, the rest is completion. That distinction is important, because similar compositions are easily presented as an ‘unknown Beethoven’, which does not do justice to Beethoven. We will never know what Beethoven exactly had in mind with this concert, but Cees Nieuwenhuizen sure managed to create an exciting piece of music!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @JFrameMan
    @JFrameMan 3 роки тому +7

    golden underrated content.

  • @melvynmsobel210
    @melvynmsobel210 2 роки тому +1

    Fascinating glimpse into Beethoven's thinking and processing! Thanks for a chance to hear this marvelous "work."

  • @jlpicardUSS1701e
    @jlpicardUSS1701e Рік тому +5

    Great performance! Finally a great reconstruction done with the Great Maestro in mind and following in his passion and verve of composing majestic sounding music for generations to come. I can't have enough of Beethoven's genius. I am thrilled at the idea that someone could actually find the right key to the maestro's heart.
    Much different than the shabby execution of the fragmentary 10th Symphony that sounds as if an inexperienced schoolboy amused himself to attempt to emulate the genius that was Beethoven, instead of closely following Beethoven's fury and strength in music. If Beethoven has to be performed, it has to have passion and risk taking to be involved in it.
    And here one can clearly listen and taste such an unbridled and unconditional passion that Ludwig van Beethoven had in his heart and in his inner mind.
    Bravo to all the performers of this wonderful "coda" of the grand master of music, and thank you for having done so! Ludwig would be proud...

    • @Upstream-music
      @Upstream-music  Рік тому +1

      Thank you for these lovely words, we are really proud of this reconsruction. Also we are happy to announce it will have it's world premiere this year. Due to Covid it was cancelled a few times, but it looks like it will happen in August this year, in Amerika.

    • @LoveandLight13789
      @LoveandLight13789 Рік тому

      @@Upstream-music Wonderful news! I am so glad it will happen. I believe it should be with Krystian Zimerman or not at all.

    • @classicallpvault8251
      @classicallpvault8251 Рік тому

      @@Upstream-music Somebody should attempt to take the thematic material and process it into a slow movement and a rondo to finish it off.

  • @laurahelenaxou1834
    @laurahelenaxou1834 2 роки тому +4

    Wow, finally a version that sounds like a real concerto!! It seems to me that Nieuwenhuizen used both Beethoven's 4th, 5th and violin concertos structural ideas in order to (re)construct this one, I felt some of the 4th concerto ideas specially at the cadenza, well, I don't know very well neither music nor composition, I just like to listen to the great masters' music, but I felt even some of Tchaikovsky's ideas specially at the very end, I must to confess that I didn't like too much the conclusion (the very last notes), I expected more, it sounded somewhat weak to me, but it is infinitely better than the Cook's reconstruction "forced" last notes, I think Beethoven would make more "ostentatious" last notes (combined with piano), these last notes sounded to me like the WoO 4 concerto's last notes. While Cook's reconstruction is throughout forced and lacks "strenght", "will", specially at the tempo, (some of the performances of that version just "stretch" it from a 13 minutes piece to a 18 minutes one by slowing it down, it becomes boring and even disgusting to listen to), Nieuwenhuizen version, however, is beautiful, very strong, deep, finely composed and tuned, at least to me, it does justice to Beethoven and matches his ideal, so this version is very welcome and refreshing! Thank you very much, Cees Nieuwenhuizen, may God bless you as He already blessed your musical skills! 💖💖💖

  • @nelsongustavodeoliveirales9488

    Awesome

  • @mirrors1
    @mirrors1 2 роки тому +3

    Bravo!

  • @tomapopovici7423
    @tomapopovici7423 2 роки тому +3

    This version is better than Nicholas Cook's from the '80's. It is a complete sonata form, which the other is not.

    • @Upstream-music
      @Upstream-music  2 роки тому

      You are right, it is more of a compositional reconstruction than purely musicological. Cees Nieuwenhuizen is also primarily a composer and has also had to add elements in various places to be able to call it a complete and playable reconstruction.

  • @valentinvargas8219
    @valentinvargas8219 6 місяців тому

    That's to musically monster performers,of elevated romantic spirit,my brothers.😮😮

  • @PianoTechSupport
    @PianoTechSupport Рік тому +4

    I have listened to the first 5 minutes and I cannot remember anything from it.

  • @shamusmcdonald3459
    @shamusmcdonald3459 6 місяців тому

    Is this done by AI?

  • @user-vz4fy8uw9y
    @user-vz4fy8uw9y Рік тому

    Who wrote the cadence?

  • @giovanniguglieri5287
    @giovanniguglieri5287 2 роки тому +1

    Chi suona ?

    • @geigenatelierbrusch469
      @geigenatelierbrusch469 2 роки тому +1

      Ci sarebbe veramente. interessante saperlo.

    • @fulviopolce9785
      @fulviopolce9785 2 роки тому +1

      È musica "elettronica" ?

    • @helmutlocatelli4070
      @helmutlocatelli4070 2 роки тому +1

      E soprattutto - chi ha scritto questa robaccia? Beethoven si rigirerebbe nella tomba.

    • @Gabrimedde
      @Gabrimedde 11 місяців тому

      @@helmutlocatelli4070 perchè? la prima parte del brano è scritto dallo stesso beethoven. solamente l'ultima, piccola parte è stata completata dal musicologo, pianista e compositore olandese Cees Nieuwenhuizen, divenuto tra l'altro famoso proprio per le sue trascrizioni delle opere di beethoven.

  • @MrMusicker
    @MrMusicker Рік тому +9

    Doesn't sound a bit like Beethoven. No wonder he never completed it. Just scraps of thematic material.

    • @monteverdi1567
      @monteverdi1567 Рік тому +2

      It reminds me of that spurious completion of the 10th symphony-- Beethoven's sketched ideas connected by other material 'shoehorned' into it. The description of this effort I think is accurate: Beethoven sketches with ideas drawn from other concertos to fill it in. I actually found the cadenza to be the most convincing part, but those are by definition improvisations of the performer.

    • @tonkaGuy888
      @tonkaGuy888 Рік тому +1

      Agree. More Mozart than Beethoven.

    • @plastique45
      @plastique45 Рік тому

      R/Woosh

    • @aaronschaefer
      @aaronschaefer Рік тому +1

      This music is nice, but Defiantly not Beethoven, NO one will be able to create what Beethoven was looking for. If it was not identified with Beethoven I would never know that this is supposed to be Beethoven's.

  • @user-og7hi7ck2u
    @user-og7hi7ck2u 10 місяців тому +1

    this is no beethoven.