Mandatory quarantine still involves only a small percentage of people, sporadically distributed in the society. Compelling vaccination would mean mobilizing people in every corner of a local city or the entire country. The government really wants to avoid any risk on that massive scale.
With regards to China's Foreign Policy, it's far better than their counterpart, the so-called democratic society. Why? Because they adapt the non-interference of the other countries internal affairs while the US Foreign Policy is more on Interference and government change if it opposes their directives, like for example the two party systems of government. They want the countries of the world to follow their two party systems to be member of the free world, otherwise you'll be branded as a dictator or a communist. The two party systems( two party for brevity) is applicable only to the color people government in Asia, Middle East and Africa wherein they could readily apply the colonial mentality of DIVIDE & RULE considering by following such system it gives them the authority or power to interfere with your country internal affairs. That's the "silent" provision when you adapt their system of government.
France isn't a democracy? Why do you say 'so-called democratic society'? Also, are you referring to all democratic societies? They all have different foreign policies. So, it doesn't make sense to say CHina's is better than all democratic societies and then only criticise the US.
@@adambrowne4692 First of all, allow me to define Democracy and Aristocracy. Democracy is defined as the government by the people, usually through elected representatives; practical or social equality as opposed to aristocracy while Aristocracy is defined as a government by persons of the highest rank in the state, or any group regarded as superior. Therefore, we cannot conclude that China is not a democratic society because they practice the so-called one party system. The US cannot really claimed that China is not a democratic society because it did not follow the two parties system imposed by the US. And also, I cannot read something which is not written in the definition of democracy that it should be a multi-party system. Adam, nowhere could you find in my comments that I say France is not a democratic society, I did specifically mentioned that the government of the color people of Asia, Middle East and Africa cannot be considered as democratic society because their government can properly functions only at the behest of the USA, otherwise there would be a regime change if they refused to follow their orders.
@@opiniononly8259 You're missing other important parts of democracy. For a government to really represent the people they need to be able to have the means to express their views, hold the government accountable and have proper legal protection from government interference in their lives. This is something China doesn't have. As for your assumption that Asian countries, Middle Eastern countries and African countries have no agency and only do what the US wants. I call that such BS.
@@adambrowne4692 I've no quarrels or disputes with you when it comes to people freedom to express their views and the government responsibilities or accountabilities to the people of the consequences of their actions, i.e., if we're discussing the history of China during the Mao Era where the whites called the Chinese as the "sick man of Asia" but that's no longer the case now or in accord with facts and reality in the 21st Century under the watch of Xi Jinping when China had lifted 800 M people out of poverty in such a short period of time and became the world's SUPERPOWER on his own right and "perforated" the sky for launching successively their rockets into outer space in search of waters and living things for the survival of human kind in the future ( including you & me). As regards to the BS, I believe you're in a better position to explain it considering that is your specialty and undeniably what you are.
@@jason8434 democracy is not a system of government but democracy is a compromise system. So it say. I believe there's some inconsistency of your statement. Both should be impeached.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #49 КОНЕЦ СНОВИДЕНИЙ [Прибытие Отца] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HYNdtHC9eC0/mqdefault.jpg)
Mandatory quarantine still involves only a small percentage of people, sporadically distributed in the society. Compelling vaccination would mean mobilizing people in every corner of a local city or the entire country. The government really wants to avoid any risk on that massive scale.
0 look
What is the opposite of containment?
With regards to China's Foreign Policy, it's far better than their counterpart, the so-called democratic society. Why? Because they adapt the non-interference of the other countries internal affairs while the US Foreign Policy is more on
Interference and government change if it opposes their directives, like for example the two party systems of government. They want the countries of the world to follow their two party systems to be member of the free world, otherwise you'll be branded as a dictator or a communist. The two party systems( two party for brevity) is applicable only to the color people government in Asia, Middle East and Africa wherein they could readily apply the colonial mentality of DIVIDE & RULE considering by following such system it gives them the authority or power to interfere with
your country internal affairs. That's the "silent" provision when you adapt their system of government.
France isn't a democracy? Why do you say 'so-called democratic society'?
Also, are you referring to all democratic societies? They all have different foreign policies. So, it doesn't make sense to say CHina's is better than all democratic societies and then only criticise the US.
@@adambrowne4692 First of all, allow me to define Democracy and Aristocracy. Democracy is defined as the government by the people, usually through elected representatives; practical or social equality as opposed to aristocracy while Aristocracy is defined as a government by persons of the highest rank in the state, or any group regarded as superior. Therefore, we cannot conclude that China is not a democratic society because they practice the so-called one party system. The US cannot really claimed that China is not a democratic society because it did not follow the two parties system imposed by the US. And also, I cannot read something which is not written in the definition of democracy that it should be a multi-party system.
Adam, nowhere could you find in my comments
that I say France is not a democratic society, I did specifically mentioned that the government of the color people of Asia, Middle East and Africa cannot be considered as democratic society because their government can properly functions only at the behest of the USA, otherwise there would be a regime change if they refused to follow their orders.
@@opiniononly8259 You're missing other important parts of democracy. For a government to really represent the people they need to be able to have the means to express their views, hold the government accountable and have proper legal protection from government interference in their lives. This is something China doesn't have.
As for your assumption that Asian countries, Middle Eastern countries and African countries have no agency and only do what the US wants. I call that such BS.
@@adambrowne4692 I've no quarrels or disputes with you when it comes to people freedom to express their views and the government responsibilities or accountabilities to the people of the consequences of their actions, i.e., if we're discussing the history of China during the Mao Era
where the whites called the Chinese as the "sick man of Asia" but that's no longer the case now or in accord with facts and reality in the 21st Century under the watch of Xi Jinping when China had lifted 800 M people out of poverty in such a short period of time and became the world's SUPERPOWER on his own right and "perforated" the sky for launching successively their rockets into outer space in search of waters and living things for the survival of human kind in the future ( including you & me).
As regards to the BS, I believe you're in a better position to explain it considering that is your specialty and undeniably what you are.
@@jason8434 democracy is not a system of government but democracy is a compromise system. So it say. I believe there's some inconsistency of your statement. Both should be impeached.