Resident Evil 3 Review - The Rise of S.T.A.R.killer
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- A review of Capcom's greatest/worst remake (depending on how blinded by nostalgia or how much of a Call of Duty shooter dudebro you are)
Support: / nerrel
Discord chat: / discord - Ігри
The texture pack I was using for the original RE3 is the RE3SHDP mod. You can find it here: www.reshdp.com/re3/
Just to ask. What would you say is your favourite of the PS1 trilogy?
Fans doing more to preserve and improve the classic RE games.
You'd think Capcom would've done a HD remaster for current consoles and pc of the classic RE games.
@@Gruntvc the pre rendered backrounds are sadly lost in time due to them using sgi hardware to render said backrounds witch isnt suported by modern hardware
@@Gruntvc In short: No
Long story: Capcom only cares about money and not about quality.
THANK YOU.
It's actually quite funny how in the first remake they turned Mr. X into Nemesis, constantly and unpredictibly stalking you, and THEN in the second remake turned Nemesis into Mr. X, appearing only in scripted places and mostly leaving you alone.
Shit, that made me laugh. Too true.
good point.
@@panterxbeats i think the bigger point is they shouldnt have nemmified Mr. X
Well you’d imagine capcom would give all the budget and time to the re4make. Hopefully they take the criticism of 3 into 4
@@at0micl0bster lol thats what I thought about the criticisms of 2. I think they at least did better with the music and keeping the save room theme but thats about it.
BUT HOW MANY TWERKING TINGLES NERREL
WE DEMAND THE SEXY TWERKING THAT GIVES US THE TINGLES
NERREL! NERREL!? FUCKING ANSWER US NERREL
8 kooloos out of a full Limpah
THERE IS ALWAYS 1 MISTAKE NERREL!
8/10 *******
Gotta love how the main character is thrown about like sacks of potatoes and all that happens is she gets slightly confused and upset as a result.
The Rocket Launcher doesn't even hurt or knock you around that much from Nemmy.
He is firing moderately fast potatoes.
thelastgogeta rocket jumping, man
The amount of times Nemesis has his hands on you and doesn't kill you is comical.
He's just fond of Jill and wants to give her a hug 😁
I mean like could just snap your neck but nah lets just beat it under its dead is his approuch.
That’s the same exact thing I said when Mendez just held Leon by his neck and didn’t kill him, or when mr x did the exact same thing. Or when mr x didn’t attack Claire and sherry in the elevator
@@kujo4388 Mendez can be forgiven because he has an ego and thinks Leon can’t hurt him, unlike nemesis who’s sole goal is to kill these specific people as efficiently as possible to show off how lethal he is
Flashbacks to the "Throwminator" from _Salvation._
Well technically we cannot even call Nemesis a STARS killer because according to the Remake he doesn’t actually kill any STARS members. In the original he did but in the Remake he didn’t.
yeah it was very disappointing Brad didnt die from him. That scene was so impactful AND on top of that Jill doesnt even go back to the RPD, no Nemesis window crashing. There was a lot of missed potential once again with this.
2020 Remake Nemesis: 0 STARS kills and utterly fails to be scary. Wears a trash bag on head and shoots off into the sky like a mutated spider man.
1999 Nemesis: Is slowly built up by encountering Brad in RC, before he makes a grand entrance in front of the RPD and kills Brad. Basically an organic Terminator. Iconic leather outfit.
Yeah, even Resident Evil Apocalypse Nemesis is laughing at 2020 Remake Nemesis. Apocalypse Nemesis has the highest STARS kill count too lol.
i thought it strange that Brad got bit by a random zombie early on. I was expecting him to just get killed by nemesis. but apparently he also got bit in the original so i guess that part was the same.
THANK YOU for mentioning that bit about how happy Claire was when seeing Leon. I remember when playing that bit that she comes across as a complete psycho.
it doesn't help that her mocapping face animations are Uncanny Valley as fuck
Tentacular That’s because she needs Leon to help her continue the Redfield bloodline.
Remake Claire is not PS1 Claire, same as Remake Jill isn't PS1 Jill. They share the same name and role as those characters but their personalities and designs are all Off.
She was really thirsty in that scene.
I thought these remakes could make decent live action movies. But good god not the remakes ive been waiting 20 years for.
It seems like REmake 1 was the way to go in terms of making remakes.
Not enough giant spiders in these last two REmakes
RE1 Remake 2002 was handled by the original creator, Shinji Mikami. He wanted to make a remake that surpassed and expanded content from RE1 1996. He accomplished that and tgat remake is still highly regarded.
That's not the case with RE2 Remake and especially RE3 Remake. Their more reboots, not remakes.
REmake 1 is so good! I never played the original RE1, but I have played REmake a bunch of times. It is my overall favourite Resident Evil game and one of my favourite games of all time. I give it a 10/10 without question!
REmake 2 and 3 aren't really REmakes, but rather REinterpretations. Playing them is completely different from playing the originals and they can't be considered replacements. Both products are very different and different people will prefer different ones. However REmake 1 seems to have completely replaced or improved on everything from the original RE1, making it largely unnecessary to play the original unless you are nostalgic or curious. That's a true REmake. Pokemon Heart Gold & Soul Silver is another that jumps to mind.
@@Gruntvc I liked re2r. I think it will be fondly remembered. I don't don't think the same will be said for this. I also don't think Jill's strong independent woman persona will age well either from this remake, I enjoyed her banter all the same for the most part
@@mezzuna i dont think she comes across as a "strong independent woman" bit-character, i think she comes across as initially suspicious of the people that were hired by Umbrella and otherwise determined. Also i think how well re3r is remembered will be determined by how well re4r is executed if that is the next release
This remake sounds kind of half-hearted. I don't get the point in trying to update a classic for a new generation if you're not going to put in the elbow grease, Capcom
They're not trying to update a classic. They're trying to take advantage of nostalgia in an effort to make easy money.
@@abstractdaddy1384 And they failed miserably on that front too
They should have just remade the backgrounds in full 3d and made it a 1st person game
It's not really a remake from what I'm hearing.
@@libertyprime69 Thing is...it's called "Resident Evil 3"...so it's pretty much setting itself up for comparison with the original.
2:01 "I can't believe you committed suicide. How could you have committed suicide?"
... I see what you did there >_>
Lol Neil Breen?
I can't pull you outta this one, bud.
I didn't understand, can someone explain that "joke"?
@@sanglish18 It's a reference to a scene in the Neil Breen masterpiece film, "Fateful Findings".
@@libertyprime69 Oh I see, thanks for explaining. I normally don't watch any movies
The game was rushed to hell. I mentioned my concern when it was first announced but somehow people didn't have issues with a full blown remake being announced only a few months after the previous one when REmake2 took about 4 years to make.
Both games were being developed at the same time, but RE2re team did not make this game, it was from another team from Capcom.
"Resident Evil 3 was under development for approximately three years prior to its announcement in 2019.[6][7][8] Development was handled by Capcom and its subsidiary K2 Inc, with assistance from Redworks and M-Two, the latter being founded by former PlatinumGames CEO Tatsuya Minami".
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resident_Evil_3_(2020_video_game)
@@jt4560 I am aware but I honestly find that hard to believe. So much content was scrapped
@@Melkac Things can take time, especially when a lower team is working on something, Working with new engines can be very time consuming and making sure the game can run stable. I would say their limitations of 3 years are what caused parts to be cut out and things could have been re-written. Not excusing the cut content but I'm thinking this was the team's first run with the new engine, which is common and it can cause loner development time.
Considering it runs on the same engine it didn't bother me they made it so quick. I have the same complaints as everyone else, but I'm happy Capcom is still interested in making these games.
The more these remakes come out the more I wish they were just like REmake 1 from the gamecube....
I mean why weren't they in the first place, right? The whole reason people wanted RE2 to be remade was because of how great RE1 remake was in every way. Why would capcom take such a different route in remaking the other games? Why do people support and praise the changes in a way that makes the originals seem like they were never adequate?
That was incredible, wasn't it? These games just don't seem in that league, and the lack of music/fixed cameras/atmosphere/important sections just can't be ignored. I'm surprised that RE1 Remake hasn't been remade, and maybe even RE4 will one day :(
@@Poseiden2
I think it stops at 3. Maybe code veronica might get the same treatment. Maybe not though considering resident evil 3 remake was made along with resident evil 2 remake because of how similar the originals were. Code veronica is a bit more riskier because the demand for that game to be remade wasn't as high as 2 or even 3.
But yeah RE4 is gonna be left alone Im sure of it.
@@dalgusmaximus4557 i think capcom needs to take a step back and look at what square is doing with FF7R, which I've heard nothing but good things about.
@@TheLegendOfLame
I haven't played the original or the remake of ff7 but I did play a bit of the ff7 demo. The gameplay and music is fun but the game's set pieces and action sequences are a little ridiculous translated into modern gameplay.
They turned the nemesis in this game into what Mr X was in the original RE2. That was the big issue. Especially after seeing Mr X being so formidable
Just like my last girlfriend, this game is great looking, fun to play with for a few hours but ultimately shallow.
It she a witch because you just burn her alive
Don't you mean "but ultimately hollow"?
I don't think you can call a blow up doll a girlfriend...
@@KnightSquire Quit talking about yourself.
Guys who mention girlfriends in chat are usually referencing imaginary women
@@dreamcaster100 that's bullshit! I have multiple blow up dolls... I ain't ready to settle down with one.
You can definitely tell Nerrel was unemployed because he's uploaded twice in one week.
Hope you're doing alright friend.
It's nice to hear someone who actually played the 1999 game and knows it. A lot of people never mentions how randomized the original game was because they probably never played it more than once or at least not back to back. I think Upscaled RE3: Nemesis on Dolphin is the better option short of an RE 2002 style remake which will never happen anyway.
Doesn’t even kill a single stars member in this
Right??
-Brad Vikers dies
@@SillyCoyotee Yeah, but he's referring to Nemesis. Nemesis doesn't even kill a single stars member. Like he did in the original.
yeah the stars killer who doesn't kill any stars, sure
@@SirPonnd That's accurate tho. I mean Nemesis was easy to dodge. I dont think I ever died to Nemesis in the remake. He was kind of a bitch
Here i was thinking you were gonna tear this game a new one....... But you stayed in a less pessimistic perspective and focused on the game's intents and departures.
Quite a contrast from most of the cynicism and comparative bitching i seen from other players so far.
Well Played Nerrel, just as i like it, tough but fair.
-Thats what i like about Nerrel , he sticks to his own perceptions rather than bandwagoning or exclusively subverting everything like most comment section lobotimites think-
That RE1 Suit was the Cherry ontop of your Ice Cream
Most people: The Resident Evil 3 Remake is way too short.
Me: *Glances at my playtime after my 5th playthrough*
*21 hours*
Yep, that's true.
I'm only on my third playthrough and already have 24h... I guess I just suck xD
Or maybe I'm too conversative with ammo...
Sure but it is longer than the gem it is based on and as long as one run of REmake 2 or even REmake 1.
It is CVX that doubled (well, not quite) the base length of campaigns.
yeah i mean no offense but i was really really taking my time with this game and die quite a bit playing on standard and my playtime was like 5h40m
@@residenteviltalk same here
@@residenteviltalk Yep me too.
All I wanted out of REmake 2 & 3 were more games that were on par with the 1st remake. It's the pinnacle of this series: taking everything about the original game and refined it without compromises to gameplay. It thrusted you into that mansion to decide how to survive it. And that's what I find so offensive about REmake 2 & 3, their unwillingness to fully immerse players into the survivor role.
Resident Evil, at it's best, is a game about player-driven decision making in a consequence-filled environment. It's a game that asks players to face the unknown with only a finite amount of healing items, ammo, inventory space, and ink ribbons: your means of saving. Not even the ability to save your game is exempt from that fact. A ballsy choice of the devs. Also keep in mind that you'll be doing this without autosaving, spelled out objectives, interaction icons, excessive tutorials, or that insulting/pandering map that keeps track of all things interactive for you.
What makes REmake 2 & 3's outcomes all the more tragic for me is that I see a lot of potential within for greatness. Maybe the devs misunderstood the franchise's core appeal? Maybe the massive budget AAA games get is a blessing and a curse that forces compromises to maximize profit? I can't forgive them either way. I could go into deeper detail, but don't have the time to do so in a comment. Someday I will.
I've had this pent up frustration since REmake 2 released. A lot of people give it huge praise and I wanted to be one them. Yet the flaws are far too apparent to ignore for, what feels like only, me. It's a very isolating feeling to bear. I can only hope there are other conflicted RE fans that find my comment to confirm that neither of us are alone in our feelings.
RE6 almost killed this franchise I grew up with. I'm afraid that REmake 3 will succeed.
PrideOnInsightGamer I miss soooo much the survival aspect of these games and agree with everything you said, resident evil became so recognized for its great survival and scarce resource management what they did to RE3 remake feels like an insult to the franchise and capcom really owes some respect to Jill and nemesis, after all these classic characters made resident evil relevant as a franchise. I'm so sad about this, at least re1 remake exists so I'll have to play that
I'll say I'm biased as a guy who thinks that really loves RE2make and prefers it to the original, but even still I can totally respect the opinion that these two games aren't good remakes in the way the first one was, but I don't think it's fair to say that at least 2, but also even 3 at times completely miss the point of this franchise's core appeal. In fact, the less scripted way a lot of things are handled I think improves it.
Not only are all of the elements you mentioned still a focus in RE2make, with the only thing I'd call "gratuitous" being the ink ribbons but even then I used up most of them, but if anything I thought the way a lot of encounters like the lickers were handled made the situation much more engaging than the original.
As opposed to being a scripted, cinematic walk towards obvious danger up ahead, you're often thrust without warning into staring down a lot of the game's new enemy types without any sort of meaningful pause with stuff like a cutscene to try and "scare" the player before the actual gameplay starts. I think in that regard it's hit the nail on the head of a survivor a lot more because instead of focusing too hard on characters constantly crossing paths or stupid decisions logistically it's more about the player choosing the best way to survive and proceed with the situation when wrenches are constantly being thrown into your plans surprisingly.
Basically I get the comments like atmosphere and all of that, but I think from a game play standpoint these two games have done well to capture the spirit of the original's limited mobility and meaningful decision making in every encounter without going too resident evil 4 to the point where it feels like you have an endless amount of options in every situation, but RE3 definitely feels a bit too linear and generous with ammunition, and I don't feel like those parts get enough credit.
So basically "If you are going in expecting nothing but a mediocre game that just has some references to og Resident Evil 3 you are in for disappointment"
For the most part I enjoyed it but man, I'm really disappointed with how trivial they made Nemesis.
The torn in half image with the dialogue had me in stiches, lmao
4:17 “it’s mostly just gross” makes me utterly fall apart with laughter and i don’t even understand why
The problem was that the "B" team was developing this, and it was clearly more rushed to ensure it didn't get too close with the release of RE8 and still felt fresh with RE2 remakes release. I understand why they did it but I was super disappointed cause I was looking forward to RE3, but on the PlayStation 4. "RE6 lite" really is the best description. I enjoyed the game but was just disappointed by the largely cut corners and lack of content, especially the clock tower and expanded city.
I really like you're perspective of these games being bad remakes but being good games as they are. RE3 Remake was totally rushed though which is a shame. They could have at least put in more areas to increase the length.
2:00 lol, nice one
Yeah, I noticed that. What is that a reference to?
@@SirPonnd one of neil breen's awful movies. i think its called "fateful findings".
here's the scene either way ua-cam.com/video/dOV3xTJ9UgE/v-deo.html
I played the original many many times, that when I see this game I have no necessity to play it whatsoever
You are missing out, it brings a new perspective just like how RE2 Remake brought a new perspective
@@baez1301 bringing new perspectives doesn't mean they are good.
Metroided R34 no, but in this case it is
@@IwenPulgar maybe for RE2 but for RE3 no
if you don't mind paying for a 5-7 hour game you should give it shot. it may be a completely different experience from the original but its still very fun
As Nerrel has said if a remake isn't superior in every way to a game made 20 years ago then it can't really be deemed a total success - ReMake was a complete improvement on the original RE1. How can an RE3 game with missing areas, almost inaudible music, less atmosphere and a forgettable(!?) Nemesis be a complete improvement? And the use of OTS camera always seems to turn these games into a kind of RE4/RE6 hybrid.
PS - looking at this review - has the 'objective' marker returned? That's all we need, another one-time survival horror title when you're constantly being ordered around!
Thank you Nerrel for uploading more in this boring time. I find your videos incredibly rewatchable, but I must admit new content is appreciated, because instead of this I'd be rewatching the same reviews about the SNES controller, your motion controls saga, the emulation stuff, and all the Zelda and Metroid videos. Or, I'd be rewatching them more than I already am.
Also if you haven't already, I recommend you try out Monster Tale for the DS. The game is all about traversing this world of monsters run by children that stumbled into it, with a monster of your own who can transform , each transformation with it's own unique ability. It was the game that introduced me to metroidvanias, and has pretty good reviews on metacritic, would love to see your take on it.
@@flippinfluff6778
That game sounds fun. Ima look it up on ebay maybe...
I was pretty bummed when I finished the game so quickly in standard and ran thru it much faster in hardcore. nightmare, however, is a scary beast. I just started feeling confident about playing the game and they reshuffle items and throw WAY more enemies at you. it rly is a good replay value for that one.
That is a very sneaky Neil Breen reference. Very good. Well done.
The developers said that they'll never go back to the fixed camera angles ever again, because they think that we have moved long past that now. As for this remake, I prefer it's atmosphere over the previous one. I'm mostly a sucker for eye candy, and I love how the game made Racoon City pop out. It's pretty rare to see horror look this way. There were some parts that did give me a good scare here and there, but it seems that 7 scared me more. I was surprised that we didn't get to the part or the clock tower (which I forgot about until you brought it up), but I still liked the changes here. As for the zombies, I don't think that recycling them from part 2 was THAT BAD of a thing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't this game suppose to take place at the same night as 2, but just in a different time? So I think it would make some sense to see the same zombies in this one. And before I forget, the zombies in the background that you pointed out reminded me of the news anchor from RE6!
These games aren't canon, right? Because I just can't for the life of me see REmake 2 Leon eventually becoming Re4 Leon, I just can't.
Also Code Veronica doesn't need to be remade. Not that it's perfect or anything (it's the 2nd weakest classic RE) but it doesn't need to be reimagined because the visuals still hold up.
He went under secret service training inbetween 2 and 4
@@yaboil7774 I meant Leon as a character, not his skills as a fighter.
wth, re3make is almost 3 years old?
this decade is flying by
This continues the trend of resident evil being the most consistently polarizing franchise in gaming. Honestly I assume 8 and the heavily rumoured 4 remake will be just the same. If and when they do remakes if Code Veronica and RE1 and 0 this will repeat itself.
Honestly I've had enough of them rehashing games. Just make something fucking new for god sakes...
Speaking of reused assets, the orange car Jill hits Nemesis with at the beginning of the game is actually Ethan's car in RE7 with a recolor.
I died at "Could you please stay 6 feet apart please!"
2:01 nice Neil Breen Reference
You do have to ask on why capcom decided to remove the replayable elements of these reimaginings. 2 by taking away a proper A and B scenerio. 3 making taking away the braching choices
4:40, You should've said "I did not add these sound effects."
easily the most underrated channel right now
I didn't mind the change that much,what really bother me is the fact of how linear the game became,now its just a corridor shooter with zombies...
1:59 how did I not notice this fateful findings reference my first time watching this video
I hope that someday Capcom ACTUALLY remakes RE2 and RE3.
I mean... just look how perfect REmake1 is.
At 2:01, is that a Neil Breen reference? Fateful Findings?
Dude you are killing it with your reviews and editorials. Great content. Keep up the fantastic work.
Fuck man. I was so hyped for a new survival horror
I know this sounds random but i really like the sound of your voice
Automatically hears Wild side playing in head every time when Jill and Nemesis are running around.
8:26
Gamingbrit: "Goddamnit dude stop passive agressively bullying me!"
Nerrel always be criticizing games 😂 that's why i like this channel
One of my favorite critics personally
Yeah, it's almost likes he's a game critic or something.
RE2 took me about 28h to get the Platinum Trophy (including post launch content), while RE3 took me 21h but honestly, I had almost 3x as much fun. My biggest criticism lies less with the game and more with Capcom's decision making. This should've been a 40$ standalone expansion to RE2 and slightly longer but they decided to instead put resources towards a multiplayer game they could monetize.
One thing we can all surely agree on was that Jill was awesome in this game. Hope they keep her face model and voice actress for future games
Since nerrel forgot to rate this one I guess I'll do it:
I give this game 8 twerking tingles and a surprised Pikachu out of 10.
Nerrel you told everybody we banged after your RE review even though I specifically told you not to
yeah, your channel is good.
By the way, I understood that you enjoyed the game, but still seemed that you didn't showed enough what you thought of its strengths
It would be cool if these remakes came with the full versions of the original games too. It would definitely add more value.
2:00 I wonder if there are any existing comments pointing out the Fateful Findings reference lol
4:41 lmao I needed that laugh this is the most honest truthful review I've seen on this platform good job as always
While I don't agree with many points you make (Mr.X being annoying, being flush with ammo, remake 2 stradling the line, etc.) I like that you articulte your points without pointing groups of people out.
I personally love RE2 remake WAY more than RE3. From how you need to memorize surroundings, mangage resources more, worrying about Mr. X, I liked it all more than RE3 short and pretty scripted campaign. I've played through every difficutly of RE2 and made sure to get the highest rank possible on it. I did the same with RE3, but nowhere near the amount of time was spent or enjoyment had.
Also, when you mentioned that over the shoulder shooting would always lead into shoot outs, the RE3 remake was indeed made by a different team within Capcom. I believe it was M2 that did RE3 while Capcom Divison 1 did RE2. They must have had different ideas on how to make the game.
I'm not against a more action focused RE game; I feel that Resident Evil 3 was too short for this type of game, though. Had it had more set pieces, more open level design, had a bit more length to it, it could have been better. As is, it's a highly scripted, onrails, quickly done adventure. If you want to be actiony, that's fine, but I need more control and I definitely need the game to be longer, more than anything else.
I’ve watched this video a number of times and I just finally caught this gag at 2:01
Man, I didn't even play the original resident evil 2 and I was still mad about the B campaigns. Like, wtf is with that tease, telling us "it's what the other character was doing during their campaign!" and then just have it be literally identical with slightly harder puzzles and more aggressive enemy placements, but with one initial tiny deviation of how you get to rpd. I mean, they tell you its at the same time, but don't explain why all the puzzles have reset, items respawned, doors relock, destroyed stuff get fixed, etc.
I was more hyped for this game than I’ve been for any other game in a long time. It was fun, but it wasn’t nearly as good as I’d hoped. It made re2 remake feel like a better more substantial game and I was hoping for the exact opposite. At this point I’m really really hoping for single player DLC
The original will always be the best . This game was a slap in the face for the old g who played the original
As more of an admirer of the series, remake 2 got me really interested in the series. Despite older fans misgivings, I loved remake 2. It had this incredibly classy and highly produced feel.
The remake of 3 just never gave me this impression and coupled with it's quick release, it didn't excite me whatsoever. There was something about the story of remake 3 that I felt off-putting, particularly the characters. Maybe someone could help me put my finger on this lol
Holy fuck that opening, oh my god what have they done.
Probably the best review of this I’ve seen.
I don't give a shit about this game, I just really enjoy your videos.
I'm beginning to think Nerrel has complex thoughts about the Resident Evil series...
Man. You take 2 months to upload and now you post weekly. What is this shit?
Thanks :) I love your videos
How could they Fuck this up so badly? Why did they rush it out? I thought this game was going to be longer & better than 2. I could forgive the removed areas if they had choices at least. How disappointing. Maybe they will add like a 30gb patch ehhhhhh?
They cut way too much stuff out of the game. Removed costumes, removed entire sections of the game, and (the worst offense in my opinion) they removed Mercenaries. The game just does not offer enough content unless you are interested in 100% completion.
Compare that to RE2 Remake which gave you 4th Survivor, Tofu, Claire/Leon’s campaign (depending on who you did first), as well as the A/B scenarios (even though those were half lacking)This game gives you...more difficulties...that’s it. compare it to 2002 REmake which offered costumes, Invisible Enemy, the realistic Item Box, One Dangerous Zombie, etc...An 18 year old game offers more variety than a $60 game in 2020 and that is stupid
9:23 The man's voice, the audio, anyone knew from what movie?
The fucking Neil breen reference
These character models are really popular...
Personally I loved the intro sequence. You never get a real gauge of how strong Nemesis is in the original. But seeing him burst through walls, floors, and using a part of a wall as a battering ram displays his raw power. In the original he just ran, slang his tentacles everwhere, and shot rockets. That's it. The intro set a precedent that he's not Mr.X. He's not mostly going to just be kind and open doors. Which is what you assume what he does in the original since none of the doors or walls are destroyed in the original. He goes through a window in the RPD and that was about it.
That said, I did feel like this game was scarier than the original. Especially on Nightmare mode when Lickers show up when you don't expect it and the Hunters were a force to reckon with. I HATED running into a Hunter because they can just end you in a one hit kill that isn't easy to avoid. And then Nemesis sprints even faster on Nightmare. Giving you much less room to breath. RE2 was really only scary when Mr.X was coming after you. Other than that, it felt very action oriented. At least to me it did. The G mutants in the sewer weren't scary. They were just annoying. And it made the sewer level suck.
Capcom pretty much forced them to release this game as is, so i don't
think they were able to accomplish everything they wanted.
I also think they had actually started working on the clocktower but when they were told
the game was coming out they scrapped it, why else would we get an out
of place prop in the subway station called "clocktower monument" , and there is an area straight up named "clock
tower plaza.I think they wanted to stick it around the part where you
surfaced from the under ground section before the second Nemesis fight.
I intently nerf myself in the game by choosing hardcore the first time and removing Hud elements, it's a way to sorta get that element of survival horror in there. Alot of ammo is wasted because of inaccurate panick shots, and ammo is very hard to find as well. Getting poked also hurts bad.
I DIDNT EVEN FUCKING KNOW YOU COULD MASH A TO ESCAPE ZOMBS.
If only they left ink ribbons in there in harder modes.
Good review Nerrel. B Rank.
The settings allow you to make it a "Hold" input to lower damage from enemies. A nice addition for accessibility, though it loses a bit of the thrill.
@@thelastgogeta So thats it. I fully support accesibility options, like that.
@@MarkVegaX Yeah, I actually watched a streamer (DevilNeverCry) who previously dismissed it but seemed to appreciate it during Inferno mode for consistency especially as you die super fast.
Options are mondo cool.
6:54 These are really just the same area with a new coat of paint.
This remake is the opposite of the Final Fantasy 7 Remake in that FF7 padded an eight hour section to be nearly 40 hours while RE3 idea of trimming the fat was amputating a whole arm(content like the park and Clock Tower).
2:00 holy shit, them backgrounds are crisp as fuck, i just finished the game on GameCube and most backgrounds were a blurry mess, how did you?
I think they can expand what they have with DLC. Different endings,different routes,more stuff to unlock like costumes and mercenaries mode.
They should've added that from the start, especially given how short the game is.
@UFHoee I didn't say you should pay for it lol
2:01 lol! What?!?!
It's a reference to Fateful Findings (2013)
I wouldn’t say resident evil 3 remake is more repayable than resident evil 2 remake, when you in re 2 remake can play it once, and then see it from the characters perspective in the b scenario. I felt like i had to play re 2 about 4 times before i saw everything it had to offer, while i saw everything re 3 had to offer in one play through.(note that i do love both games, but re 3 remake is definitely a step down form the re 2 remake) and last but not least mr.x in re 2 remake is a fantastic reimagining, since he adds tremendous tension, and encourages you to learn his behavior, and how to hide from him, but it also adds a new survival horror element since you have to consider if it is worth the ammo, AND alerting mr.x when shooting a zombie. And the re 2 remakes removel of the fixed camera was a bit disappointing at first, but the tradeoff ended just being better gameplay where the player are given more engaging ways to interact with the environment. This makes resident evil 2 remake the definitive way to play resident evil 2 in my opinion. On the other hand, with resident evil 3 remake nemesis was transformed into a scripted set of events and never felt mensing or scary. With all the things that was cut from the 3rd remake i would say it doesn’t replace the original game as i was hoping it would, making it a bit disappointing. My only hopes are that resident evil 4 remake will get the same care and love the first 2 remakes got.
2:00 love that Neil Breen reference
2:01 is that a fucking neal breen reference!?
Nerrel, mod list for you getting your old resident evils to look like that?
It's a fine game but I do hate the way Jill's face looks! I miss Julia Voth
0:24 *WHEN YOU FEEL MY HEAT*
Steam had a sale on Resident Evil Games this last weekend. I got Resident 2 Remake and Resident Evil 3 Remake for $29.95 and then I bought Resident Evil 0 to 7, plus RE Revelations 2 for about $30..So I bought pretty much every mainline Resident Evil Game for less than $60. I mainly bought the bundle for the Resident Evil 0 & Resident Evil 1 Remakes/Remasters, and for Resident Evil 4..I played through Resident Evil 3 and it was kinda meh. I ended the game with a ridiculous amount of ammo and weapons.
The game definitely looks great on PC. I have a Ryzen 7 3700X and an ASUS Dual Evo 5700xt..It looks killer on high settings, especially the lighting and shadows.
The RE2 zombie moans in the credits was perfect haha!
Hey Nerrel, what version of the original RE3 is this footage from? It looks so sharp and clean. I want to replay it but don't want to play a blurry version.
What is up with those high res original RE3 shots?
4:40 jill's "bitch can't even swim" line would have really drove it home here
I really wish some gaming programmers would start a kickstarter of Resident Evil 3 Classic Mode game where it gets the same remake style of Resident Evil 1 for the game cube.
Glad I waited and got this on sale for like $26 around Halloween last year on Steam.The advent of playing around with character mods is about the only thing that can keep this game interesting for me.
Ah, another video from Ner "8 out of 10" Rel.
I still believe that survival horror works best with clunkier tank controls and fixed camera angles
That Neil Breen reference caught me off guard lmao