NASA: Alright, we're gonna build a helicopter. Got it? Danny2462, wiggling the throttle on a probe until it reaches exponential acceleration and spins at 14 million RPM, shredding the planet and opening a wormhole to let out the space Kraken: "A helicopter? That's cute."
No, it’s 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000a0l0m0s0t0t0he0r0e00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 times over
1:25 It might just go from “calcualte air flow speed and pressure and shit to find the amount of air produced” when it’s open to just “check if there’s inakeAir in this part” when closed. And only when it’s closed does infinite fuel tell the game “yep there’s intakeAir in here”
I agree. My guess is that when it is closed, the game treats it as a fuel tank for air rather than an intake, so the produced air can actually go into it. That may not be the case though
fun fact: you made me buy this game three years ago. even now i cannot escape the feeling of screwing around in sandbox games honestly tho, thanks for the cool content
Too much deploy angle makes the blades stall. It's tricky. I love the "nonsense" on the intake air deprived message. :D I think closing the intakes makes the game think they've been closed since Kerbin, and thus still have stored air. Eventually, it'll probably run out. If you fit 2 high-capacity inputs and use a KAL-1000 running continuously in a loop, briefly toggling them open, (but not at the same time,) I think you'll have continuous air forever. EDIT: Or maybe it just makes the intakes tanks for the air coming from the negative engine. That's more likely in that it's not such a crazy bug.
Danny! if you want to make a low-effort 2 spin thing helicopter, put another motor on another but the one that is spinning ontop needs to be opposite of which way the bottom one is spinning, it needs to have 2x the RPM aswell basically: (really horribly drawn ASCII propellers) ----------[::::[]::::]--------- -> any RPM you want ----------[::::[]::::]---------
NASA achievement with "Ingenuity": - first non-rocket flight on other planet Danny2462 achievement with "Trial and Error": - first non-rocket hopping on other planet - first non-rocket flight on other planet - first jet-powered flight on other planet - first barrel roll on other planet - first ballistic missile launch on other planet - first failed ballistic missile flight on other planet It's clear who has the better method here.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"
Thumbnail was misleading. Eyes popped out of my head when I read "Ingenuity Outsourced", and the grid layout on my subscription page didn't show "Outsourced to Kerbals". Unsure if that was click bait... Enjoyed none the less! :)
@@Danny2462 but the "look at my patrons" thing replaced the cool old outros :( if you value your patrons go replace kerbal and part names randomly with patron names :)
@@Danny2462 nonsense, a simple script is all you need and you won't need to update the patreons list in editing, you have the list just feed it to a script :>
Yes. JUST like Nasa. Well. Nasa from 1960. But still. And yes. 1960 NASA has LOTS of similar stories. Really. The number of crashes and explosions they had are....astronomical. See what I did there?
If you think that was shorter than it should've been, that's because I had to cut a lot out to salvage the video, it happens 🤷♂️
Okay
just un-short the video
nah it was just right
No problem dude 🙂
hey danny which mods do you use?
*NASA:* Alright, we're gonna build a helicopter. Got it?
*Danny2462, already designing a guided missile:* ...What?
NASA: Alright, we're gonna build a helicopter. Got it?
Danny2462, wiggling the throttle on a probe until it reaches exponential acceleration and spins at 14 million RPM, shredding the planet and opening a wormhole to let out the space Kraken: "A helicopter? That's cute."
if danny was the ceo of a space company the universe would've probably ended 16 times over
only 16?
16 16 16
Danny:I am a kraken hunter!
Me:makes falcon 9 and shoots the kraken
No, it’s 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000a0l0m0s0t0t0he0r0e00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 times over
Pretty sure
danny: *disappears for 2 years*
also danny: *uploads once about every 3 weeks*
no come on it was one year not two
right? 👀
@@Danny2462 what's the difference in the scale of the universe?
@@pauulthefair a year
@@Ethan-lx1vv To be fair everyone lost a year
Danny versions is the best!
1:25 It might just go from “calcualte air flow speed and pressure and shit to find the amount of air produced” when it’s open to just “check if there’s inakeAir in this part” when closed. And only when it’s closed does infinite fuel tell the game “yep there’s intakeAir in here”
I agree. My guess is that when it is closed, the game treats it as a fuel tank for air rather than an intake, so the produced air can actually go into it. That may not be the case though
Sounds about right to me
Even now Danny still cant make a functioning helicopter
Genuinely impossible
@@Danny2462 me with a working helicopter: i can feel the power
I've built a munbase but never made a spaceplane
aerodynamics is hard
I can barely launch rockets ever since they updated the aero model
@@ENCHANTMEN_ Ironically I’ve built a working SSTO but can’t build a Munbase.
@@polishkerbal6920 huehue mine also works :P
Danny: Generates oxygen for a jet engine on Duna
Elon: *teach me*
just tell the engine to make negative thrust, it's easy
They used the MOXIE on the rover
@@alexsiemers7898 ^ this
Hello Josh, you can't escape me!
@@Danny2462 CLEARLY
I love the airwolf music at the beginning
Hey - at least he didn't destroy the planet this time.
fun fact: you made me buy this game three years ago. even now i cannot escape the feeling of screwing around in sandbox games
honestly tho, thanks for the cool content
I love hearing that people got the game because of me! Thank _you!_
Airwolf theme. Nice.
Off course!
Why didn’t nasa just send a jet fighter with closed intakes?
The Airwolf theme at the beginning, though...
New idea: Airwolf, but outsourced to Kerbals
Oh god, no.
@@ThePandoraGuy Oh hell yeah
I second that, Airwolf in KSP would be grand
@@lockheedx33 But im afraid of the things that might.....will happen.
@@samspeed6271 Hazard-ish made Airwolf, I want to see what chaos Danny could create with his own Airwolf.
0:45 That wasn't flying; that was falling with style.
Gotta love the airwolf theme song
Indistinguishable
The best screw position is 5 degrees + -
it is not logical but it works
I like the inclusion of the air wolf theme at the start.
Damn, those sound effects! The editing quality's just skyrocketing ;)
IT GOES BRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Damn, that Airwolf theme ... oh, the nostalgia
0:32 rip mouse
Why didn't nasa do it like this? I mean... THIS IS JUST GENIUS!
You guys should join his discord, it's lit
Good job danny
FBI bouta bust down Dannys door and commandeer his computer for NASA.
I worked on one of the chips that was used in Ingenuity, and I'm surprised it wasn't a more Kerbal flight.
I love explosions...
At first i was like :o
But then i am like :0
I couldn’t even tell the difference!
Too much deploy angle makes the blades stall. It's tricky.
I love the "nonsense" on the intake air deprived message. :D I think closing the intakes makes the game think they've been closed since Kerbin, and thus still have stored air. Eventually, it'll probably run out. If you fit 2 high-capacity inputs and use a KAL-1000 running continuously in a loop, briefly toggling them open, (but not at the same time,) I think you'll have continuous air forever. EDIT: Or maybe it just makes the intakes tanks for the air coming from the negative engine. That's more likely in that it's not such a crazy bug.
I tried making a caption video. I now fully understand your upload schedule.
Never boring with u Danny!
Now that’s a professional!
Wehen Danny makes helicopters, everyone in an 100 mile Radius starts to prepare for the worst
(Or if he makes ANYTHING)
Honestly, the helicopters seem to be some of Danny's safest inventions.
100 miles? Try a few lightyears! I've seen his flat Kerbin video. XD
@@eekee6034 oh that's right, he ruined the observeable universe once
This is the most accurate ingenuity I've seen. the other ones, for example matt lowne's, is just a rotor with a probe core and battery.
I'm really really happy you're still making uploads. I'm sorry the algorithm hasn't been kind :(
Patreon makes the algorithm beating me up hurt less!
@@Danny2462 So true!
I have yet to make a functioning helicopter in KSP, but damn I kinda want to try and do my own Ingenuity now!
*It is a good day to be not dead!*
Pow! You are dead.
this is a certified tf2 moment
I am dead!
Danny! if you want to make a low-effort 2 spin thing helicopter, put another motor on another but the one that is spinning ontop needs to be opposite of which way the bottom one is spinning, it needs to have 2x the RPM aswell
basically:
(really horribly drawn ASCII propellers)
----------[::::[]::::]--------- -> any RPM you want
----------[::::[]::::]---------
Electric guitars start playing
Ingenuity: *My time has come*
Im glad that Danny uploads every few weeks, after he took off a year.
The return of the king!
I can't quite explain why this is entertaining me, but it is.
According to UA-cam statistics this video is amazing
According to me I agree!
Remember, UA-cam statistics are never wrong!
YelloWool/SpiritOfTheLaw music feels especially well chosen for stock props lol.
New vid pog
NASA achievement with "Ingenuity":
- first non-rocket flight on other planet
Danny2462 achievement with "Trial and Error":
- first non-rocket hopping on other planet
- first non-rocket flight on other planet
- first jet-powered flight on other planet
- first barrel roll on other planet
- first ballistic missile launch on other planet
- first failed ballistic missile flight on other planet
It's clear who has the better method here.
Danny: *crashes helicopter*
Also Danny: Just like NASA!
Is that a threat, or…
My god, they modded an empty Needler to fly.
Sadly there are no helicopters in simple rockets 2
I see what you did there with that intro!!!
"Well, it works in Kerbal Space Program"
No... wait...
Yay! You are back!
This is actually Elon Musk's secret gaming channel and he's quietly dissing nasa.
doge to the moon
Patience bravery inteligy perservance kindness justice determination
That was a lot better than the real one
Nasa Actually uses KSP to test their rockets
I'm pretty sure Mars in this game has no air.
So you are doomed from the beginning.
Accurate af
Can you explain the glitches used? How did you overclock the throttle and how did you get an air breathing engine to work on Duna?
here ya go, it was a 3-part project: ua-cam.com/video/zwZFZv9Ifo4/v-deo.html
**Danny:** "Haha, helicopter go brrrrr
**Helicopter:** **Does not go brr**
**Danny:** "........F$&K IT, GUIDED MISSILE TIME, WOOOOOOO!!!!"
when it didn't go brrr, I felt that
It did too go brr! Just like a lawnmower! Sadly, those don't fly either. (And now that I've said this, I'm afraid I may have given Danny an Idea)
Why is 1:05 making me choke so much?
Ingenuity’s deranged cousin.
The kerbal way is the best way
What are your first plans for KSP2? Use nuclear rockets to fry kerbals? Make something that will feed the kraken? Or normal gameplay?
This is why I don't use propeller blades and instead use heli blades.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"
Mind making a playlist containing these "Outsourced to Kerbals" videos?
Can you upgrade it to be Airwolf, because the the first set of music hints at it
I get the impression there is a reason Danny2462 and Elon Musk have never been seen in the same room
hey danny what mods are you using?
True kerbal
try the ducted propellers
1:38 YEEEEEEEEEEAAAH like REAL BRUTAL MAN LETS SHIT IN PANTS YEEEEEE WOOOOO
Danny: *time warps and bends space time*
Also Danny: “just like NASA”
Sorry but what?
Yooooo poggers
Homie has been doing this for 9 years...
Crazy man
Did they patch the glitch that gives you infinite thrust because I can’t replicate it
Stupid NASA. Should've just overclocked their engines for infinite fuel...
In Situ Resource Utilization?
More like... air... creation...
Moxie!
Thumbnail was misleading. Eyes popped out of my head when I read "Ingenuity Outsourced", and the grid layout on my subscription page didn't show "Outsourced to Kerbals". Unsure if that was click bait... Enjoyed none the less! :)
nah just can't fit that many words on the thumbnail
Still missing the old outro music with funny outro cards, and i hate the "look at muh patreons" :(
patrons must be cherished at all costs
@@Danny2462 but the "look at my patrons" thing replaced the cool old outros :( if you value your patrons go replace kerbal and part names randomly with patron names :)
@@dimitar4y that is a very impractical suggestion
@@Danny2462 nonsense, a simple script is all you need and you won't need to update the patreons list in editing, you have the list just feed it to a script :>
NASA? More like ASSA amiright?
how tf did you manage to get a jet working on duna
by not being NASA
also ua-cam.com/video/zwZFZv9Ifo4/v-deo.html
What graphics card do you use?
Sapphire Pulse 5700 XT
I use the Intel UHD Graphics 620.
GeForce RTX 2060 here
Yes. JUST like Nasa. Well. Nasa from 1960. But still.
And yes. 1960 NASA has LOTS of similar stories. Really. The number of crashes and explosions they had are....astronomical.
See what I did there?
aaaa
am i actualy first...
aaaa
embed fail on discord
[Algorithm food]
very good i kiss u on the cheek
Ksp’s Propeller’s suck. Change my mind.
35 mins
not first
FIRST
Too short video
Agreed
Same
First