Is gaming at 30FPS really that bad?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 лип 2023
- With many recent console games releases restricting games to 30FPS I wanted to know what kind of experience people would be having. Can you still game and get a great experience with only 30 FPS on your screen? Let’s find out.
#TechLabUK #PCGaming #30FPSGaming
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @techlabuk
Visit the Website
techlab.tobiasflanders.com/
Follow Us
Instagram: / techlab_uk
Twitter: / techlab_uk
Facebook: / techlab.tf
Twitch: / techlabuk
Join the Community
Discord: / discord
Steam: steamcommunity.com/groups/tec...
Support Us
Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/...
Amazon Affiliate: amzn.to/3GSs29y
OverclockersUK Affiliate: tidd.ly/3B23tGs
CDKeys Affiliate: www.cdkeys.com/?mw_aref=TechLabUK
Fanatical Affiliate: www.fanatical.com?ref=techlabuk - Наука та технологія
Lock the framerate to 25FPS for 3 days. Then play on 30 FPS. Everything will feel butter smooth.
So true i used to play games with 15 fps now 30 fps looks really good but 60 fps makes me dizzy for some reason
y'all Really complaining on 30 fps?? 💀
Try playing at 20 fp and you'll see how smooth 30 fps is
When i was about 14-16 years old. All i cared about was getting top frames without dropping at highest resolutions. As i grew older i realized allc that mindset was doing was tarnishing my love for actually focusing on playing and enjoying games. I would awlays spend money on upgrades I didnt need and tell myself i needed them. It was reallt bad, and then I grew up even more. Im 24 now and dince 18 years old ive been playing half my games at 30fps locked ultra and its fantastic. I dont know how the younger me couldnt handle the lower framerates. But its really not even inching close to how bad people make it out to be. It was weird for the first 3 days of playing 30fps adter playing at 144hz, then my eyes adjusted and now to me 30 and 60 are the best of both worlds. 60 now looks like how 144 did years ago for me. And 30 is well, 30... its noticable but beyond enjoyable and beyond playable.
I think if you're playing a more story driven game on a controller, 30 FPS is tolerable. But in any competitive game, I believe it isn't enough. Great video as always mate!
It's way more than tolerable, we've been doing that forever with like 90% of games (give or take) for like 24 years now. I use to game at like 90fps and over back in 2009 before it was common, and I could barely tell any difference than 60fps. It's gets ridiculous unless you're some teen competing on CSGO, PUBG, Fornite etc. So to me, pointless.
Back when I used to play CS:GO a lot, there was this phase I had where I lowered all my graphics settings to get the game running at 90-100 fps (I was even playing in a 4:3 aspect ratio) because I bought into the whole nonsense of higher fps will greatly improved my gameplay. It did not. I was still getting stomped on in competitive mode.
What did improve my skills with CS:GO was a wired internet connection and actually learning the maps: where to aim, where to throw grenades, communicate with teammates, know the callout spots, etc. I eventually moved my graphic setting back to medium and with widescreen. Average fps then was around 30-35. Your eyes adjust to it way faster than you think.
While trying it for myself on pc, I noticed that using an fps limiter to cap at 30 rather than using half refresh rate in control panel, is considerably more responsive.
And even more responsive is having vsync off while capping at 30 fps. Even when you run the game at 30 hz output rather than rate limiting, having vsync off is very responsive.
As long as you're enjoying the game I think that's all that matters.
And Stray was such a great find for myself. I initially purchased the game for me and the kids to play, only to get hooked on it myself.
I bought it for myself and the kids took it off me lol
@@TechLabUKtry 25 next 50 hz its playable ps2 stable fps days on pal.
Most important thing is to allow your eyes time to adjust when locking the framerate lower. The immediate effect is a shock to the system, but after about 30 minutes of playing I perceive it as smoother. It certainly helps as a fallback when games are poorly optimized. Same thing happens with 60fps if I've been playing a game at 120. I go back and it suddenly looks framey until I give it some time.
What I used to do is cap at 15 play for a very little bit and then cap at 30 and it feels smooth if you are used to 60. I play mostly at 30 now even if i can go higher since it keeps ur gpu usage lower and makea it stable
This is exactly what I was gonna say. I've been playing a lot on my Steam Deck recently, and I spend a lot of time goofing around with the refresh rates to eek the most out of the battery. When you first switch to 30 FPS, it looks chuggy as hell. 10 minutes later, and you don't even notice it anymore. It's made me realize that, moreso than anything, it's a consistent framerate that's most important.
That's not to say that 60+ FPS isn't worth it. If you have the choice, going higher will always be better. It's just that 30 FPS isn't unplayable.
And since we're on the subject, the Steam Deck also made me wonder why it is that we've always been stuck with choosing between 30 or 60. 45 FPS seems to be the perfect happy medium, both literally and figuratively. It's easier to achieve on lower end hardware, easier to keep stable, and feels more like 60 FPS while playing.
True.
Something I feel like is worth mentioning is that it feels a lot different playing a 30fps game with a controller compared to mouse and keyboard
Its coz analogic
Because of mouse jitter that works into the camera movement.
is mnk worse or better then controller?
@@havoc4596 preference. competitively, mnk. Controller will feel a lot smoother tho.
the thing is, if you're already used with more higher fps like 60 or even 120++
then you'll notice the huge difference
when i don't have pc and play on ps4, i'm perfectly fine with 30fps
sitting at a distance and a controller in hand, 30fps is completely playable
You'll notice for the first 10 minutes, then your eyes will adjust.
well most of us grew up playing low framerates on consoles before we got our PCs as adults so we're used to it lol. I didn't get my first real gaming PC until I was like 22 yos. before that I was playing on console.
It’s adding the run to the R3. You have it that way one time and you can’t go back to the old way.
Pc people are just clowns who bought into marketing
Should have used rtss with passive wait turned off and possibly front edge sync for better frame pacing
What's absolutely hilarious is even if it does drop down to 30 frames you're not going to know unless you have the frame counter up.
You need to use Riva Turner RTSS to cap the FPS so those Frametimes are locked. Next you want a Variable Refresh Rate monitor set at 120hz for the best input. The reality is on ps5 on a 120hz display the games will be running at 40 not 30. 144hz set FPS to 36. Off Camera I Play on a 32 inch 4K display 144hz VRR capable Adaptive sync on RTSS Cap at 36 High settings with DLSS Quality 4060ti i3 13100f xbox controller and ingame motion Blur on and every demanding Game there are no issues. 4k low power on a budget.
I have the impression that limiting frames in the game settings are always the best. If it is not comfortable, limiting through the drive might be better for 40 fps or something a little bit higher
You are very correct. To get the best input latency I use the in game frame limiters and if they only have vsync i go to Nvidia control panel or use radeon Chill and those frametimes are beautiful. Animation work is admired even at 30 fps motion blur
My inner snob is about to present itself… yeah, I really struggle with thirty frames. I can even notice a considerable difference between thirty and forty frames. Cool video!
Oh yeah, you can tell a difference. 30FPS is playable but not sure how Console gamers put up with higher resolutions and then forced to 30FPS suddenly due to the game :/
Lowest playable is 45 fps anything lower than that and my eyes feel like they’re in pain 💀🪦
As a console player, I prefer higher visual fidelity at the cost of FPS on single players games. Mutiplayer, minimum of 60 is necessary IMO. On my Series X with my LG OLED I play Warzone at 120fps and its very enjoyable!
Hmm that’s strange to me tbh. I would rather make the game look like roblox on low before I go less then 60 😅 I was borrowing my friends ps5 and couldn’t even play bloodborn or uncharted 4 cuz it was giving me a headache
@@Monkeyman-qt1smskill issue
@@banheart9960 pleb issue
@@Monkeyman-qt1sm i play 30 fps warzone 2 on ps4. The game is Fluid ( oh and i play whit pc player that play like 120 fps) they dont have any Advantaged lol
@@banheart9960 you can lie to yourself all you want. They have every advantage 🤣. Sbmm is working double time to find you lobby’s to compete in🤦🏻♂️💀
While 60fps is ideal, most games are playable between 20 and 45 ish FPS. It also depends on your standards and how bad do you wan to play, I remember I used tonplay WoW on my potato laptop at 8-15 FPS when I was younger 😂. Nowadays I can play most games between 30-60 FPS and even some at high FPS (100+). Tbh the smoothness of movement is really nice and worth more than graphics fidelity. To me the priority for s game goes something like this: FPS (45+), Resolution, G.Quality. If FPS low then I lower the graphics first, if at lowest settings still can't get a dwcen framerate then I lower the resolution slightly and move the quality settings until I get the FPS I want to. Ideally nothing gets lower than 900p, but some games can be played ok at 720p, lower than that and I would just skip the game, is not worth it.
Call me weird, but sometimes i get motionsick in some games where's happening really fast movements. So chopping fps in half sometimes help.
I experience that 30 fps on warzone 2.0 new maps i7 8700. I decided to re ramp my whole rig. R5 5500 with Rx 6600 no more issue worth the upgrade.
This might sound crazy but i think the intended idea of how motion blur works with 30fps on a big TV screen is the user is mostly looking at the center of the screen focusing on the character. Its only when you sit yhe camera and the game really comes to life with the motion blured framerate and animation work with a still camera
My monitor is old and cannot do adaptive sync. I wish radeon has half vsync like nvidia.
As someone who prefers graphics mode, it really depends on the game, the quality of the animation and other features such as motion blur can help a lot.
I have found some games are quite choppy in graphics mode, and these cases, I will use performance mode; while other games look and feel really smooth in graphics mode.
Casual game/story mode type of games yes i prefer 30 fps but for competitive games i prefer 60
I was having lots of trouble keeping steady frames on rdr2 with my puny rtx2045. I was setting all the graphics settings to the absolute minimum and still getting stuttered fps. Once i capped the fps the game looks really good again. Kinda like im playing on a 360 console again, i suppose. But its at least playable and not frustrating.
PS5 is around RX 6700 non XT in terms of gpu power and Ryzen 7 3700X in terms of cpu power. I think the 30fps cap in demanding games is alright for that kind of hardware.. I'm not sure how powerful Xbox Series X gpu is, but i've heard it's a little bit faster than PS5.
I don’t really see how that is the case, maybe I’m just a sucker for choice but I have a 1660 ti and a Ryzen 7 3750 or something in my laptop and have 45 frames in starfield on neon, 60 if I’m inside of a building
With a 6700 idk how it’s even possible to get less then 60 lol
Didn't stop Microsoft and Sony from lying to their customers with their 4k 60+fps claims. Should be criminal...
Didn't stop Microsoft and Sony from lying to their customers with their 4k 60+fps claims. Should be criminal...
The biggest plus to 60 FPS, at least for me, is camera movement smoothness. Panning the camera at 60 FPS is so much nicer than doing it at 30.
I've been a PC/mac gamer since 2001 and I've always aimed for 60-100 fps and anything less I didn't like. I got the Series X last month and I still refuse to play anything under 60 fps. I tried Lies Of P in 30 fps mode and hated it. I've never tried 120 fps but I think 60 fps should be minimum going forward.
Console 30fps uses half vsync, you can use this in nvidia gpu by using nvidia inspector and set the frame rate to 1/2 refresh rate. It will give perfect frame pacing and no stuttering but you have to use controller because input lag with mouse is unbearable
It's a small thing of course, but according to the PC gaming Wiki
The built-in frame rate limiter of the Nvidia display drivers introduces 2+ frames of delay, while RTSS (and possibly other alternatives) only introduces 1 frame of delay
For people who care about input lag it may be useful to know
@@lorenzovertemati4104 i never said to use nvidia frame rate limiter, read again genius, off course using RTSS to lock fps below the refresh rate Vsync limit like for 30 using 29.96 is recommended to further reduce input lag
I've been playing Elden Ring on my PS4 for over a hundred hours, I'm on my third playthrough going for the platinum thropy. Yes it stutter sometimes but not game braking, it's a smooth 30fps most of the time. It's not perfect but it's playable for me.
for me, the only thing make the 30fps pc experience like the console 30fps is when i increased the controller sensitivity in game menu, in any game
My issue is with my LG OLED.. It's fast and smooth but I notice REALLY bad stretching?? If I look at objects and pan left to right, the object doubles and it's very irritating... It's almost like ghosting, but worse in my opinion... Any suggestions? I've basically shut down all the HDR and Dolby and allm on my consoles in other to use my TV to utilize De-jutter.. t helps but it's just not right .. What monitors or TV is capable of playing 30fps smoothly?? And also be able to utilize the newer consoles fully??
I noticed the same issue on my LG CS OLED, when I played cyberpunk, but when I changed the graphics mode to performance it went away
@@ViperGTS737 ditto. Games with that option help big-time, lowering the resolution to achieve that, but I'm ok with that. Fallout 4 luckily had a FPS option before you even fire the game up.. It was night and day difference.
60 is fine. 30 feels rough to me personally. Nice vid .
Nah, back in time it was different approach to games. So we didn't feel that drastically low FPS, because game mechanics was different. But nowadays it is insanely hard to me to hop on 30 fps after 60 fps +. I'm keep struggling to play Bloodborne after DS for example. Not to mention racing games... I'm still trying to enjoy Driveclub with 30 fps... But, when I'm playing PS1 Need For Speed Porsche, which I still have it feels absolutely amazing, because mechanics, graphics and approach to the games was different
I remember getting a Dreamcast and playing Soul Caliber and seeing 60fps. It was like magic to my eyes. My last console before that was the N64, where in Goldeneye it would dip to 14fps. I'll always prefer 60fps or above but for some games 30fps isn't bad.
i believe the problem with 30fps is the slow controler responce...if increase the sensitivity in game menu the experience is much better
Without watching this video 30fps has been the standard for many years and was never an issue as we didn't complain about it. And its a silly debate saying game is unplayable when its perfectly fine
You have no idea… how hard it is to beat Dark Souls 1, 2, and 3 with an FPS BELOW 30! 😭
Depends on the division by refresh rate. On a 165Hz monitor is is a disaster, on a 60Hz screen it's fine. Obviously it's very game dependent. A story driven walking simulator is fine, but something like Doom: Eternal should be illegal at 30fps.
what is a good 30fps monitor
I honestly don't mind games being 30 fps because if the game functions fine, then theres no problem from my end.
I heard that using a controller makes PC games feel much smoother, since a mouse's precision can pick up all the jitters that work their way into the camera movement.
Yes, using a controller does make 30 FPS actually pretty playable, depth of field and motion blur will help too if you enable them but that's up to you.
Personally for me, I don’t think 30FPS is not a bad thing for me. 40FPS is the sweet spot for me. And 60FPS for me is so freaking awesome.
Since making this video I have heard the same from quite a few and it's awesome to hear about people just enjoying gaming without chasing the frames. Also, thanks for the Super
I play or use some games, 30 FPS is enough for me, depending on the game, it's just as fluid as 60 FPS for me, but it doesn't matter with which hardware FSR, DLSS, DLAA, and what the other functions are all called, just like ray tracing and 2K and 4K is at in every game, so I always turn it off by hand because I find DLSS etc. to be useless for me, the same as raytracing, the same and therefore turn off the function because I like the old form better
My main problem with 30 is that I find it genuinely hard to look at as it can make my eyes ache
You should add wattage on afterburner to highlight on of the perk to game @ 30fps especially with a nicely efficient RX 6600 👌Also i got flat frame graph and no stutter on most solo games using RivaTuner instead of ingame option or Radeon Chill.
Most games with a controller don't feel badbat 30fps. Assuming there isn't a problem with the frame pacing. But 40fps on 120rz display is the sweet spot for me.
24fps is typically a cinematic framerate and I use 30fps for filming action-type sequences. It actually looks fine at 30 even with action shots.
for me playing at 60 fps or higher is to save me from motion sickness i was not into consoles when they were capped at 30. and each time a game comes out on xbox series X and ps5 i always always always choose performance mode. no matter what to keep that 60 fps to not get sick. and yes i also have this issue on pc and have to turn off headbob and so on :P
Same. 60 fps is my minimum. Even on my PC/Mac I liked games best in the 60-100 fps. Even though my monitors were capped at 60hz, going higher than 60 just made interaction so buttery smooth and I didn't mind tearing.
30 is fine. I'm still playing retro games like this and they're great.
what can we do with screan tearing at 30 fps?
Usually enabling Vsync on the game help with this. Usually.
Recently played Arkham Knight for the first time on my PS5. That game is a perfect example of 30 fps done right.
This helped remind that 30 fps isn't as bad as i thought. I still think 60 fps is the best middle ground. Ideally games should be optimised to play to 60 fps on pc but if you have older hardware dropping to 30 is an option with up to date hardware should be able to play at least 90 fps on 4k. In the end to will depend but with graphics cards increasing in price so much I find that more focus should be on performance then perfect image quality. Having a good art style direction is much more appealing for both performance and visuals.
if you really want to compare the two you have to have constant 30 fps with motion blur and controller and have to sit bit far from your screen only then you will get the feel of how console player play on 30fps.
Short answer: Absolutely playable, when its locked in an application called River Tuner. But make sure that the game gets 30+ all of the time. Thats what I used to play every games on my 60hz monitor by either locking it to 30 or 40 or 60...Its perfectly playable when its not dropping from our expected value..
I have an RTX 4070 Super TI.. and lately I have purposely been playing games at 30 fps and it actually feels great lol
Yes games are basically broken with 30 fps. Whenever i try it it becomes unplayable instantly. In shooters i can't even land a single hit anymore and i wouldn't call myself a bad player.
Great video - but i want to see more Flight sim locked at 30fps :)😬
Good job you playing it on the PC then :D
@@TechLabUK he'll yeah
What is this FPS counter called?
MSI Afterburner with RivaTuner. I did a video on it previously.
I trued playing RDR2.
I got to the first town and just couldn’t do it anymore.
Feels so old and dated.
Game needs a 60 fps patch like stat.
Xbro here. Yes. My comrades don't seem to mind, but they are blind. My eyes have been opened. 30 FPS is an unacceptable frame rate. I don't care about 4k resolution if the game runs like a flash game. 1080p is what most people have anyways.
After having played at way higher fps, I really can not go back to 30 fps. To me it looks horrible.
It's so stuttery, wdym smooth?
Driver based FPS limiter is crap on AMD. Even some games that have FPS limiters built in arent that good: - frame pacing is often jittery and inconsistent. Instead I recommend using MSI Afterburner & Riva Tuner Statistics Server combo, and limit FPS in Riva tuner (and DISABLE Passive Waiting in RTSS options for best results). Nvidia users can use FPS limiter in Nvidia control panel. but you can't change FPS cap on the fly, you must restart the game, minus that you don't have "disable passive mode" option to begin with. Riva Tuner is the golden standard for FPS cap
I see in the video in game "Stray" that mili-second counter is bouncing like crazy. It should stay at exactly 33.3 ms. Avoid using in game FPS cap with external FPS Limiters. -They don't like to cooperate well.
nothing wrong with 30fps. The only thing is if you taste 60fps or even higher it's hard to go back
After like 3 minutes 30fps look kind of the same as 60 but more motion blur.
If it is a shooter or playing with mouse then 60+fps is the way.
For something not that camera sensitive then i like 30fps no problem.
Frame have to be stable tho,i would prefer stable 30fps over 60 fps that goes down to 55fps during the game.
Stray looks not jittery on my series x what’s going on
Stray is 60fps on consoles, same with doom eternal and The Last of Us Part 1 has a 60+fps mode as well.
i just realized i have been playing games at 15 to maybe 30 fps
Hundreds of millions of console players already proved that 30fps is fine. I don't mind it either. And i have a gaming pc with rx6600xt.
I'd rather not play at all than play at 30 or less
The problem is once u go up u cant go down, i typically expect at least 200 now 😆
IMO 30 fps is fine in most types of games *if* you are using a dual analog controller. I find that turning the camera with a mouse (or with Steam Controller trackpads or Flick Stick) is simply too laggy at 30 fps to be enjoyable. I also find that most first person games (even with a controller) feel a bit too laggy unless I'm running at at least 50 fps.
But in the majority of games I play (mostly 3rd person action-adventure and RPG type games), 30 fps with a controller is totally fine and I'm happy to play that way if it saves me some money.
Yes. Is bad. Anything below 60 is bad.
When limiting Fps with Rivatuner instead and having good motion blur, 30fps is a bit better. 40 is noticable smoother and kinda almost enjoyable
30fps in CS is death
The ideal hz is 666 fps for gayming
Gaming at 30fps is perfectly fine for the vast majority of games and its kind of mandatory for some games with bad pc ports like Elden Ring or those that run on UE4. Capping games that do shader compilation on the fly will drastically help with making the game feel more stable and relying on in-game frame limiters isn't ideal because they don't ever give you consistent frametimes which will make the game feel awful to control and look jittery in motion even if your fps counter is showing a locked 30fps in busy scenes. The video demonstrates this at 4:15 by showing the frametime graph going nuts when turning the camera, granted it doesn't last long but will creep back up the more you play. This is why gamers think 30fps plays and looks like hot garbage on pc but can strangely tolerate it on console. If you limit your framerate with a separate program like RTSS and change the frame limiting mode from async to back edge sync you will get perfectly even frametimes. Using RTSS like this will give you something comparable to console like smoothness.
I have a 6800xt and a 5800x3D which was a hand me down from a friend who needed a threadripper for work. Even with that gpu/cpu pairing I had issues with spellcaster enemies making the game have a stroke. They would cause a very brief but annoying stutter that wasn't due to shader compilation, must be something with the engine idk. Exploring the swamps after the first merchant in Liurnia was hell because that entire first part of the swamp is crawling with mages that cast black/gold bolts constantly.
After about 6 months I reinstalled ER and capped the game to 30 immediately. Sure it took me about 15 minutes to get used to 30fps but it was totally worth it since ER played flawlessly. It almost felt like Fromsoft optimized it pretty well for 30 but they had issues with getting it to run at 60 without issues on all platforms.
And that's a very important point, as much as we want 60FPS on PC, I don't think many devs actually cater to their games running at 30+ because they prioritise consoles. Some games even rely on 30FPS for their physics to work properly.
What people unknowingly hate about 30 FPS is not the actual 30 FPS. It's (un)responsiveness. You have to sweat a bit to make that input lag go as low as possible and this includes a bit of tinker that not everyone does. You have to turn off vsync wherever you see that option, you have to install rtss and use the limiter and not in-game limiters because rtss has super stable frametimes. Sometimes rtss introduces bad tearing no matter what so you need to use in-game limiters or mods where you get stutters but those frametime stutters are more tolerable than tearing or other kinds of stutters and they almost disappear if playing with mouse keyboard instead of gamepad.
60 FPS kills immersion for me most of the time so this is what I do on both steam deck and desktop (controller or kbm).
This is not the ps3/360 27fps era no more and we have so many options and so much freedom. Make that 30 fps rock solid and watch how much more time you spend gaming that one session.
Until Unless you never experienced higher fps
Having grown up with games that dipped below 20 fps, I think a locked 30 fps is nice. 60 fps is just being spoiled.
That’s wild 30 makes my head hurt lol
Hello, my name is Sebby and I play all my PC Games at 30fps when possible.
30 fps is more than enough for me and im limit almost every game i play at 30 fps because of stable fps . My pc not be able to keep 60 fps stable for new gen games at max settings
for me user low end laptop
30 fps is already great even
It does depend on the game for me. Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom's performance doesn't bother me.
"I was going to test a competitive title but I dont' have any installed".. do you not know how to install games? huh? why is that a roadblock
All I have to say is vr is locked at nothing less then 90 sooo
If you're sticking with the 360 or ps3
As a person who owns a pc and console, this is not at all indicative of how console plays. 30fps feels way different on actual console hardware.
"On actual console hardware"
Consoles don't have their own custom hardware like they did back in the day, it's literally an APU with GDDR6 memory, better specs and less brandwidth. And still, that has nothing to do with how they feel. And 30 FPS feel the exact same, they feel better if you plug a controller since it adds input LAG and set Half V-Sync at 60 Hz which is what the consoles use, it will be the same, or better, since you'll be able to keep a more stable framerate. I played GTA5 yesterday on my old PS4 with some friends... not really a good experience with the performance, I was able to enjoy the game but the performance was and felt horrible, and they're no different from PC unless you decide to use K&M, because it's not comfortable if you use that because of the mouse's camera movement being even more choppy.
If I want stable fps at high graphics settings, it will be perfect for me.
30 is fine with a smeer of motion blur, I don’t know what’s with other people!!
Motion blur polishes it alll!!!!!!!!!
Zelda Ocaria of Time runs at 20fps..... If that was playable, everything above that is
On my oled tv 30 fps is absolutely unplayable. On crt it is fine.
Just watching this video gave me a headache 😂
Nope, I would never pay $1000 dollars or more for a PC that becomes worthless after a short period of time. And depreciates like crazy. I have a One X which does beautiful 4k 30fps (some 60fps) gaming. Something you'll pay like $1000 or so to do on a PC. Most in the range can barely do 1440p Ultra. Also the Series X/PS5 for WAY less are much better deals. I like casual PC gaming as I have a 1660 TI in my Dell Inspiron which works just fine and never overheats. Which is great considering it's not even a GAMING PC. I get sick of all the tests, and benchmarks. Maybe I've lost my NERD (then again I'm 48) not 18. lol
Bro if I get 30 fps in game iam more than happy...
TBF I generally don't mind as long as the game is good lol
yes...
In shooters if your even vaguely competitive you are going to get owned by the sweaty teen gods out there with lightening reflexes at anything less than 90 fps. 120 is what I try for as the minimum 1% and don't care what the game looks like to get it because death screens look bad no matter the graphics settings :)
Well I did play comp in Halo Infinite back when it came out, at a smooth 20-25 FPS, and did not have any issues getting to the top of the scoreboard in both comp and normal multiplayer matches
Having the game run at 40 fps but drop down to 30 should be a better experience.
Definitely playable I'm okay with it especially for console gaming but 60 fps obviously better
Idk why it feels so bad and slow on pc but very smooth on ps4 wtf 😂
TBH It's the way games are configured and setup on the consoles. I love consoles gaming and never really care about FPS when doing it.
They feel the same. Actually they feel awful on most PS4 games because they're very unstable with lits of drops. They feel better mainly because K&M at 30 FPS feels a lot worse than 30 FPS with controller. They're fine on PS5 tho, and the extra input LAG consoles have also helps.
@@accountteam9859 stable 30fps experience can be playable and enjoyable . in pc or some games on ps4 it won’t be a stable 30fps it will drop from time to time which makes it look slow and unplayable .
30 fps can be smooth. Stop using Framecap in the Game. Use just the Driver settings or Afterburner/Riva Tuner. Youre Frametime is out of hell in your test.
Yes it is
It’s a PC nerd problem really lol. Average console gamers I think just don’t notice this. I think it has to blatantly bad like stuttering to slow loading but if that’s not happening then it’s fine.
No, console players do notice that too, especially if you've been using the performance mode at 60 FPS. 30 FPS will feel horrible because you've been playing at double the framerate and latency will increase a lot. It's not unplayable, we used to play at 25 FPS at 50 Hz on the PS2, after all, but it's not something you aren't going to notice.
@@accountteam9859 it's just you
Yapping
@@kingsgaming2265 You're the only one yapping.