Assuming the wiki's timings are correct (Reaper 32s, Reactor 36s), 3 Reapers or fewer (from a single Barracks) are better with basic Barracks, 4+ is better with Reactor first. There wasn't a moment in this match where you built up 3 Reapers from a single Barracks that wasn't reinforcing the front lines or otherwise contributing to the attack. There could be an argument for a hybrid Reactor (1 Reactor 2 normal Barracks), but like you said, it is so momentum based it likely would hurt more than help.
the reactor takes more than a minute to pay off. by then ling speed is finishing and its much harder to get drone damage. better to snowball with naked rax
@@kaiser2261 Yeah that's what I was saying, there never was enough downtime to mass Reapers that aren't in use, for the breakeven point to even matter.
How can I join live feed ? When is it streamed?
It's on twitch (in desc)
I usually stream twice a week, most typically on Monday and Thursday roughly between 2 and 6 pm CEST ^^
Hit him some reapers to trick him, then, when the time comes hit him with even more reapers. That's my favourite type of strategy 😂
Being 'unpredictable' is the key, so your enemy can't predict your next move.
This looked like a campaign mission, lol
I'm starting to miss the cam. Will we see you again soon?
Always worth staying up to see a uThermal upload
When you make a challenge against pro, I feel like they accept the challenge and don't try to win with straight counter unit. Really fun to watch.
he had no time or money for a transition, so it was not him accepting a challenge, he just tried to survive however he could and…. failed.
Mark! I'm so glad you pulled this build out! I do it every time I play sc2
The pain was great but the satisfaction was greater. #MASSREAPER #uwu #sc2
You did? You naughty naughty boy
That guy aint no pro, a pro would’ve been like: “All this guy makes is reapers, time to tech switch”
I wonder what would happen if you added an scv pull at 5:30 with the 11 reapers, maybe pull like 5
Assuming the wiki's timings are correct (Reaper 32s, Reactor 36s), 3 Reapers or fewer (from a single Barracks) are better with basic Barracks, 4+ is better with Reactor first. There wasn't a moment in this match where you built up 3 Reapers from a single Barracks that wasn't reinforcing the front lines or otherwise contributing to the attack. There could be an argument for a hybrid Reactor (1 Reactor 2 normal Barracks), but like you said, it is so momentum based it likely would hurt more than help.
the reactor takes more than a minute to pay off. by then ling speed is finishing and its much harder to get drone damage. better to snowball with naked rax
@@kaiser2261 Yeah that's what I was saying, there never was enough downtime to mass Reapers that aren't in use, for the breakeven point to even matter.
@@mizark3 ah i misunderstood
@@kaiser2261 Yeah I certainly coulda phrased it better, my bad
Grim reaping at its cheesiest!
So why did he stop doing the facecam? His was one of the few I actually liked because his reactions were fun.
What happened to the face cam? :c
going for mass lings was probably his downfall
Well it was a good map to play surrounds, but uThermal Reaper micro is just too good.
@@DanielScholtus Well Thermy schooling young and old
Just a casual mass reaper build
Humiliation
thx gg
This is badass
Good game.
Let's go
First
There is always one bellend.
First!