Best Workstation GPUs 2019: Premiere, Blender, & More | RTX 5000 Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2019
- We benchmarked professional Quadro, WX, and gaming cards in workstation applications. This looks at the best GPUs for video editing, Blender, & more.
Ad: Buy EVGA's NU Audio Card on Amazon (geni.us/zUcFp78)
Article: Pending publication
Part of what we're looking at today is the performance of AMD's Radeon VII in video editing workloads, hopefully determining if its 16GB framebuffer actually proves useful in professional workloads. This will be compared and contrasted to other cards, like the RTX 5000 Quadro card, the Titan RTX, Radeon Pro WX 8200, RTX 2080 Ti, and more. Our workstation GPU benchmarks look at the best video cards for professional use, including Adobe Premiere, Magix Vegas, Blender, 3DS Max, Maya, financial and cryptography applications, V-Ray, LuxMark, SolidWorks, SiSoft Sandra, and more.
GPUs TESTED (all links to Amazon):
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000: geni.us/lAZms
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000: geni.us/XYxs
NVIDIA Titan RTX: geni.us/Tvir
EVGA RTX 2080 Ti: geni.us/Vo11
AMD Radeon VII: geni.us/QV3E
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200: geni.us/pXG6
AMD Vega 64: geni.us/RQXnL
And more
Find Rob from Techgage here: / @techgage
We have a new GN store: store.gamersnexus.net/
Like our content? Please consider becoming our Patron to support us: / gamersnexus
** Please like, comment, and subscribe for more! **
Follow us in these locations for more gaming and hardware updates:
t: / gamersnexus
f: / gamersnexus
w: www.gamersnexus.net/
Testing, Editorial: Rob Williams of Techgage
Video: Josh Svoboda, Andrew Coleman
Links to Amazon and Newegg are typically monetized on our channel (affiliate links) and may return a commission of sales to us from the retailer. This is unrelated to the product manufacturer. Any advertisements or sponsorships are disclosed within the video ("this video is brought to you by") and above the fold in the description. We do not ever produce paid content or "sponsored content" (meaning that the content is our idea and is not funded externally aside from whatever ad placement is in the beginning) and we do not ever charge manufacturers for coverage. - Ігри
Find our workstation CPU testing methodology update: ua-cam.com/video/M2zuwfQ1wsU/v-deo.html
And find our fake SD card PSA here: ua-cam.com/video/cBhNLSk0w6w/v-deo.html
You can support GN via Patreon! www.patreon.com/gamersnexus
Find Rob here: ua-cam.com/channels/-Rm-fVvpu3-aSTwG96RmTQ.html
So its better off getting a Vega 64 then professional Quadro
SpecViewPerf is not a good benchmark for SolidWorks performance. Have a look at @PugetSystems testing. They have found no perf diff between low end and high end quadros. www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/SOLIDWORKS-2018-GPU-Comparison-What-Is-the-Meaning-of-This-1112/
Your rationale that it must be a good benchmark because both AMD and nVidia feature it, is faulty logic. They feature it because it yields results suggesting that you should spend more money on more powerful cards. In the case of SolidWorks, this is untrue.
@@charliebrownauDepends on the software you use everyday. There's a lot of CUDA specific stuff out there.
Great to hear from other members of team GN!
Steve was on helium, wasn't he?
lol. I do appreciate Rob from Techgage showing up at GN for some Pro gear test vids. B)
No on LN XD
it sounds like Steve on helium, his balls chopped off and his nose plugged while half being able to pronounce words properly. it's terrible.
They just sped up the audio because of all the burns at Linus' roast
Actually, Steve's voice is also high and it all just comes down to a particular speech habit.
Timestamps
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 RED 8K to 4K 2:49
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 AVC 3:29
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 Playback Framerate 4:01
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 Encode Time 4:43
Autodesk Arnold Jaguar 5:40
Autodesk Arnold Sophie 6:15
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 GT-R 6:56
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Villa 7:27
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 1080p LookDev 8:40
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 4K LookDev 8:55
Blender 2.80.51 BMW Cycles Render 9:24
Blender 2.80.51 Classroom Cycles Render 9:51
LuxMark 3.1 Luxball 10:17
LuxMark 3.1 Hotel 10:50
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Flowers 11:44
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Teaset 12:13
Redshift 2.6.23 12:39
OctaneBench 4.00c 13:03
OctaneBench 2019 RTX 13:34
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 14:23
Autodesk Maya (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K 14:57
Dassault Systemes CATIA (SPECViewPerf 13) 15:35
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks 16:14
PTC Creo 16:33
Siemens NX 17:12
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Cryptography 17:41
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Financial 18:27
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Scientific 19:02
UL Firestrike 4K 19:41
UL TimeSpy 4K 20:00
UL VR Benchmark 20:07
Your a life saver
Thank you so much
Very helpful, thank you!
Strangely enough, all that convinced me how good a deal the Radeon 7 is!
According to AdoredTV and Coreteks that is the reason why they are standing behind in gaming launches.
the radeon 7 is a good deal , thats why :D
But it isnt faster overall compared to its two direct competitors, the 2080 and 1080 ti. Cards that you would say arent good deals, so what makes vega the good deal in this scenario? In fact, anything above a 1660 ti is a bad deal, considering how minimal the performance gains are above that. But out of all the cards here, you single out radeon 7 as the card with the value. Absolutely bizzare.
@@ericliu8434 That highly depends on your workload. And i saw several charts in this video where the Radion VII was actually leading the pack. and that for a similar price as a 2080 and way below a Quadro is quite the bargain. Magicx, Luxmark, parts of Specviewperf Siemens NX etc. In all these the Radeon VIII outperforms the other gamingcards and sometimes even the professional ones which actually makes it quite the bargain. All depends on your workload though.
@@schwarziex3563 Luxmark is a benchmark only, you cant create anything with it. And there were plenty of other applications where the 1080 ti let alone the 2080 were ahead of the radeon 7. I dont believe that any of these aforementioned cards are exceptional value for pro work, but I've yet to see a single rtx 2080 or 1080 ti owner make a point about the pro value their card has. Yet plenty of radeon 7 owners, compensating for the underwhelming gaming performance perhaps? Yeah thats probably it.
Radeon 7 is a jack of all trades at a higher level.
People talk trash about it but in reality its better than most GPU at a broader spectrum of workloads including gaming.
VII has solid performance all around no arguments.
Its the threadripper of the GPU world . Not on top in any one thing but very good at everything.
It does have double precision, useless for gaming, but gold for workload!
Too bad it's too loud and too hot compared to its direct competition.
Don't say "undervolt" because not all of them have equal undervolting capabilities. Out of the box performance with no fiddling is all that matters.
@@jeffreywarf All of them has an auto undervolt button(it takes 1 click to do) and a fan slider that could be adjusted...
What do you mean too hot? My card never goes above 61c ... what you are thinking of is junction temperature which is not representative of real temps.
The reason it's loud is the auto fan mode responding to junction temp instead of letting the real temps go to 70-80c but junction will say its 90-100c
Think of it kinda like the temperature offset on Ryzen X cpu's those high temps are not an accurate representation of what it currently is. There is about a 20-30 degree difference between Junction and real temps.
Just like Ryzen the first time temps got recorded everyone freaked out cause its really high but in reality it wasn't it's just so they can boost their clocks more... no different than radeon VII
@@Thesinistereyes1 is that out of the box performance? No. Because you need to adjust it in wattman. I said NO fiddling. Plus, what if your card won't undervolt? Because a LOT of them won't because of the silicon lottery.
This guy sounds like Nile Red with a cold!
I was wondering why that voice sounded so familiar...!
When did Gamers Nexus hire Nile Red for voice-over work?
I got a good belly laugh from that one. Thanks
I though the same thing I was like wait a minute that sounds like NileRed
Blast it with the heat gun...
The last time I did a video here, people said the same thing. I finally had to check him out, and yeah... I actually agree completely. It's weird hearing myself. His subjects are a little out of my element though ;-)
OH damn, I didn't even realize how similar they sound until I read this. You're right!
Me: Damn, I've been wandering which GPU I should get for my work station....
UA-cam: Gamers Nexus had uploaded a new video
Nice
Illuminati, they're listening!
Not illuminati. It's tech jesus who cares about his people.
Get the Radeon VII best price for performance
So what did you end up getting?
As a 3D artist this video was extremely helpful and I'm beyond grateful. This must've taken an incredible amount of time and money. You guys never cease to impress.
Holy Crap so much work! This is awesome as I'm working on setting up a room of multipurpose machines and this is exactly what I needed to see! Thank you so much!
Damn Radeon VII looks like to be exceptional value most of the times, but yeah AMD its totally a gaming card ^^
Its roughly equal to its two direct competitors, the 1080 ti and 2080 even in workstation task's. So I'm afraid it has no real value advantage even here.
@@ericliu8434 well if you need a gpu for macos then it gets an advantage lol
@@ericliu8434 2080 Ti*
@@FlicX incorrecto
@@FlicX It's a competitor to the 2080, not the 2080ti in games. How drunk are you?
I find it hard to overstate how much I appreciated this video. Great work!
I have a project going on for building a PC for an architect designer and I was confused whether to get gaming gpu or workstation gpu .... This video helped me to get the GPU performance of various cards for various softwares !!
Thank you gamernexus !
thank you for doing this, I dont see a lot of coverage when it comes to workstation benchmarks and coverage.
Nile red is that you? Gj Rob. This was very well done
Didn't know NileRed was moonlighting as a tech reviewer.
my exact thoughts. have my thumbs up.
I reckon there's a bit of Langley from the Lone Gunman on the X-Files in there too!
are you sure the narrator is NileRed?
Steve better get ready for some chemistry lessons now.
Out of curiousity why isn't Davinci Resolve covered in this?
My collection is entirely independent from Steve's, so this is my reasoning, not his. You need the paid version of Resolve in order to unlock all of its performance features. There's a comparison doc on Blackmagic's website showing what's lacking in the free version. 100% of the software I benchmark with is provided by the vendor, and BM doesn't appear to have the same level of interest in benchmarking as other companies do. And it sucks, because its oft-suggested. It could still happen at some point in the future, so don't be afraid to suggest what kind of test is important to you.
So at the very least test the free version. I'm sure if you reach out to Blackmagic Design they will be happy to provide a key.
@@muf1772 I have gone back and forth with the company many times about it. But you are right, I will work on a test for next time.
@rob many thanks! That's so bizzare that they aren't willing to work with you on that. I have a full copy of resolve and it would be awesome to see the key differences in software design and hardware usage betwlween resolve and premiere. Because from what I've seen both programs are completely different animals and utilize hardware in their own way.
Please state the price of the card at the START of the article
and provide price / performance charts.
@Damian Chiliński yeah tell that to my boss
Great Video love to see these workstation tests once in a while
thank you so much for these comparisons. I needed this video badly!
Easily the best pro-focused video you’ve ever done. Kudos for bringing in an expert.
Thank you for including Vegas. It's typically ignored from too many benchmarks. I'm glad it made an appearance and has definitely helped me decide my next GPU.
^ *proceeds to buy a gtx1050*
These benchmarks must of taken ages to compile but thank you for your hard work this really help people that are into workstations a lot.
I love the soundcard ad. It's very funny 🤣
Nice to hear other members of the GN team.
That guy sounds SO familiar. Cheers for having him do a vid!
Do I have to go to PirateBay and download Resolve for you? lol
This guy sounds like NileRed :D
But it’s you
@Techgage well well, didn't expect to find ya here. Could you do some Blender benchmarks using Dual GPU setups? Like Dual 5700, Dual 2060Super. I want to see if midrange dual gpus can outperform top end 2080ti / titan cards.
That's an amazing collection of data and even more amazing analysis of that data. In the future I'd love to see you run your tests against the studio version of Black Magic Design's DaVinci Resolve covering rendering, transcoding and any other GPU intensive jobs. An alternative might be to let us know which of your tests would be most applicable to DaVinci. From some of what I've read, DaVinci "likes" GPUs different from Premiere Pro et. al. Thanks for a first rate channel.
incredibly in-depth video love your, content keep it up !!!
We need a new video on this subject! :) Thank you for your excellent reviews!
wow, radeon vii performed consistently great and it's a far cheaper option than most other cards on the board
Also the hottest card on the market, unless you buy the waterblock for it... Which brings it's price up to around the same as the other cards anyway. xD
Yeah, it's a great card.
@@MyouKyuubi It's not that bad. Temps for this card are measured as junction temps, which are higher. It's still rather hot and uses more power, but it's not as big of a deal as people make it out to be.
Madao the first part is true, but a low-end radeon vii can be found for about $650 and you don't actually need a custom block, just a big enough AIO and airflow over the VRM with maybe some cheap stick on heatsinks. I doubt you could find a 2080ti or any of the rtx quadros for under $900 at this point in time. prices do fluctuate, but amd cards have a habit of becoming much cheaper much faster after launch and then staying that way.
@@KingHalbatorix Well the standard price for R7 is 700 dollahs, right? And if i remember correctly, the waterblock for it is around 100-200 dollahs... I could be remembering things wrong, but anyways, that brings the price of the card, in total, to 900-ish dollahs, which is roughly the price for a standard 2080, right?
2080 Ti's are more expensive than the regular 2080's, 1200 somewhere i believe?
You do get about the same performance as a 2080 Ti, for the price of a regular 2080... so i guess it is technically cheaper with R7, but by no means cheap, lol.
Also, not everybody is as confident in their ability to improvise a cooling block for their R7 without voiding warranty or destroying the card completely. So whilst it is possible to do what you suggested, it's not a reliable, and therefore, not a viable option for your average gamer, for example. So i don't consider it a valid suggestion for the purposes of this argument. : /
I don't care who does these reviews as long as we get to hear Steve's voice even as short as the advert.
BTW i enjoyed this review as well :)
Thank you for the test and review.
Gr8 video like always. Thank you for your hard work.
*YES!* These _are_ the droids i've been looking for.
Love this. Please give us more of this. 🙏
was the radeon VII running the stock gaming drivers or the Pro Driver set?
It's more of a Mode than "the Driver" My Vega FE forces my Vii in to Pro Driver mode.
That was one hell of a review, thats what i like to see; great job!
Yes agreed
Radeon VII is the average man's workstation card it seems. I don't know how the others can compare for the money.
I certainly do not like how this video seems to be talking from the point of having a blank check for all your hardware needs.
@@TheDoomerBlox well because most of these cards will be bought by companies buying maybe 50 or more in one go and they might do thousands of renders every day so they greatly benefit from every 5 to 50 seconds they can get. Also having the better qualifications and tested cards. So there might defenitely be benefits. Heck even a single person who does this as his job will probably get the extra cost out of the more expensive cards
better value for sure, unless you *need* CUDA.
@@WinterCharmVT not if you need but of you can make use of. Because if you can you should it's a very good API
@@TheDoomerBlox When you make money off what you're doing with the hardware you can probably afford a difference like this. Taking a break to upgrade your computer can also be way more costly than it seems.
Thanks for this! Finally, no stupid game benchmarks. There should be more videos like this. You could go more deeper regarding Blender Cycles.. there is so many options/optimalizations available. I would pay for a more detailed analysis by your team!
Awesome video, thanks so much, it's very helpful!
full of information, thank you.👍
👋 Hi Gamers Nexus!
Thank you so much for including Vegas Pro!
For a few months I had been searching the internet regarding GPU information related to Vegas Pro when it comes to timeline and render performance. In my own experience, my RX 460 (lower end XFX model) beat the pants of my GTX 1070 (Asus Strix) when it came to both time by a very noticeable difference, and in rendering by a small margin. When researching the issue, it took a lot of digging to find Magix used OpenCL for accelerating the program. Also, in all my digging, I couldn’t find any charts on the internet that reflected what I was seeing performance wise of a 1070 vs 460 in OpenCL. Well my 460 has crapped out and due to some other things I was looking for another GPU. One that could play ARK Survival Evolved well and have good performance in Magix Vegas Pro. ARK is a poorly optimized game and my friends Vega 56 struggled to stay above 45 FPS on mostly high settings (where I kept my 1070 and got mostly 60 to 80)
I didn’t know how the RTX 20XX cards would perform in Magix and was very hesitant to get one because of how my GTX performed. So I finally decided to take a leap of faith and get the Radeon VII. I don’t have the card yet, but your video came out only a few hours after I bought the card. I felt very reassured when I saw its placement compared to the RTX and GTX cards in your Vegas Pro testing.
Again, thank you so much for including Vegas Pro! 👍
Thanks a lot for the feedback. When I've talked to MAGIX about the issue, it's just been brushed off. NVIDIA's looked into it, but I've again never heard more about it, and I've been going back and forth with both since December. I am at the point where I believe if better NVIDIA performance comes, it's going to be a surprise to everyone.
@@RobWilliamsTG At the very least, Magix did something. When Sony owned the IP, they just let video acceleration go to the way side. From what I found, under Sony, it was so bad that people were buying cards like the GTX 650 because it didn't support any newer cards. In VP 16 Magix added GPU acceleration back in and at least it supports the newer cards, even if it's not quite to the speed some people would like.
I failed to mention, my workflow is 1080p. I don't have any 4K displays. Not that I would ask you guys to change your testing. I only wish to be complete with my comments. AND I'm just happy that you guys included both timeline and render performance for VP :)
I personally will stick with Magix for now because it is a one time fee. Pay it once and I own the program. I don't make any money off of my video editing, so financially it wouldn't be a good strategy for me to pay a subscription to Adobe.
Again, thank you and keep up the good work!
Finally you've switched to Blender 2.8, congrats!
My takeaway from this is that Radeon VII is a fantastic general-use card, not the greatest (except in some cases like Vegas pro) but does well enough in almost everything.
Hard to go wrong with it, especially for its price.
As soon as their is a custom cooler card that is quieter than stock, I will be buting one.
Heck if Raijintek release their new Morpheus first I will just get one of those.
Do more of these please.... incorporating more mid-range gpu will be a good bonus..
Great coverage.
Thank You, this was awesome info
Most excellent. Thanks for this content.
Finally, a use for the Radeon 7!
Excelent video, thank you!
Yay for this content!!
Nothing against Steve, But it was nice hearing a different voice for this.
Maybe next to him was hot muscle naked guy poster and that might intimidated him a bit .
Thanks for covering Blender! :)
Before I watch this video I wanted to say THANK YOU!!
Ok now let me see this beauty
Perfect looovvveee to see more reviews like this.
What a coincidence to find you over here! ;-)
@@Techgage just a tech lover :)
Great benchmarking video, waiting for a long time on a fresh one. I wish you'd include davinci resolve encoding along the premiere cc one, for us that are crossing over. Thank you again
Finally, GN video featuring TechJudas!
Haha, made me laugh out loud.
great video!
Pro drivers with 10 bit Colour Depth also not mentioned with Radeon Vii - As far as Pro Driver vs Regular Driver I haven't been able to see a difference but I didn't really look yet either, other than the obvious Driver overclocking with Wattman.
Nice video. Thank you.
GN, thank you for this video. I've been stuck on the 2080Ti and now my stuck is justified. For both gaming and work... with this info, the 2080Ti for me is the best value card.
Are you from New Brunswick? -A fellow Canadian.....
I'm still under the notion that Vega was gaming second. It proper compute workloads, Vega really comes into its own. The Lightroom "enhance details" makes my Vega work pure magic
Definitely east coast - I was thinking Newfoundland.
Are you a wizard? I am indeed from NB. You are right about Vega... AMD just has to keep promoting it as a gaming card to capture that market. It really is a good jack-of-all-trades card.
Well i've been thinking about building a rig with a 2070, and now I know that it performs quite nicely in arnold. Too bad the ram is still a limiting factor. Good info.
use vegas pro for my YT renders along with an RX580. The actual amount of card usage isn't much but makes a massive difference to the encode time. It nicely makes use of the ryzen cores as well.
Why didnt you run the Radeon Pro drivers for the Vega II to test vs the gaming drivers? EDIT - Is there a way to tell SVP13 to not disable non-native resolutions? I cannot select the 4K tests unfortunately as my monitor is 3840x1080. Is it possible through the debug console to disable non-native resolution support being turned off? It looks like it may be possible but I am not much of a coder so.. For what its worth some of the numbers look wrong after running the benchmark myself on my Vega FE.
Do you have Radeon Pro Image Boost turned on in the Display section of driver settings? It should rescale for you, maybe.
@@ttebroc236 Image boost only "enhances" image quality as far as I have read in the documentation. SVP13 reads your desktop display resolutions and disables anything not available. With an nV card you can get around this using using custom resolutions but the methods with AMD uses to create custom resolutions do not work the same and will not let you get around this.
@@NVMDSTEvil for example I can game at 5k with my Vega FE on my 4k monitor(image Boost resizes down to 4k), the program you have I guess doesn't allow it.
@@ttebroc236 I cant even turn the feature on in Radeon Pro Settings.
"The company today released a clarification on the matter, and explained that while it's true that some Radeon Pro features are being enabled, such as enterprise-grade security, standard feature-set, and Pro-grade driver stability; key features such as 3D application certifications and optimizations are being excluded. These would be the features you pay top-Dollar to buy Radeon Pro or competing NVIDIA Quadro products for." So according to AMD itself there would be no uplift in 3D performance with Pro driver.
As someone who got their undergrad in multimedia production using video and 3D, what I'm amazed by is the fact that 23 years after the question was asked: "Is it possible to have a gaming- AND modeling-capable video card?", the answer remains: "Ehh....kinda, yes...?" All the cores in the world, the fastest memory, inline processing, and the answer is still "well it won't do anything for you in OpenGL applications."
Fantastic!
1080ti still more than relevant yay!
Thanks for testing with Blender 2.80!
A new voice steps into the light!
And it's a good one too!
I like the expansion of the GN testing methodology. I am curious if the SisSoft Sandra Scientific test is representative of the workunits available through BOINC. Also is there an opinion on the Drystone and Whetsone benchmarks that is in built with BOINC?
GAAAMING TESSSTTTT lol, I have an RTX 6000 on the way so thanks for posting this, its hard to find any information on these Quadro cards
idk if there is a way to compare this, but please do this kind of video for IDE like visual studio/android studio ect
amazing work as always guys
This gives me hope for future AMD gpu's.
I am wondering about davinci resolve performance. Else really interesting. Keep up with that kind of content!
for resolve just buy the vega 7, or vega 64 - best bang for bug
You should have added a GTX 580 to the Vegas Pro test, it was outperforming the GTX 1080Ti in render time because it is the last GPU using the CUDA cores that Vegas supports, would have been nice to see if any newer updates might have changed that but I doubt it.
Sony believed Nvidia should pay them or be the ones to recode their software to support their new CUDA codex, not sure if that has changed since Magix took over or if the Nvidia CUDA settings are still openCL like it had been.
Thank you. I just cancelled my Quadro RTX5000 order and replaced it with Titan RTX because of this review!
>Vegas Pro is AMD territory
I've never been happier to discover this. I wonder if the version of Vegas Pro from Humble Bundle will play well with my Radeon VII.
Awesome, thanks! Please add Davinci Resolve to future benchmarks.
This is an excellent video. Do you think the RTX 5000 MAX-Q in the new Razer Blade Studio Edition will offer decent performance for a laptop?
How would the WX 9100 stack up with the rest? Between the WX 8200 and V64, or between the V64 and RVII?
I wish there was an Archicad/Revit section and elevation open test included as well as Lumion/ Twinmotion to give architects an idea of how the GPUs perform.
Why didnt you test the new Instinct cards? Like the Mi60?
Great Coverage from Microsoft Sam
AMD Vega 64 / 56 are really nice cards. I have both and i'am very happy and i got them new for a price that no other card can match them!
So when will you be reviewing that Nu Audio sound card? Funny Ad :D
Audio cards might be outside GN's testing capabilities. I don't believe they have equipment to test things like Signal to noise ratio, noise floor, ect. Not to mention many qualities of a sound card are often subjective.
Informational thank u.
Steve gave away the spotlight
NileRed, is that you? ;) Very similar voice and speaking style.
HAHA! I JUST commented the same thing! I spent half the video thinking, "WHO does this remind me of?!"
Vega. May not top charts in games. But its got no problem throwing punches when work needs to get done
Will you be reviewing the sound card that's advertising on your channel? What does it do for $250 that my $100 Soundblaster Zx doesn't, and why on earth does it have S/PDIF Out on a modern sound card, as optical downgrades hi-res (Atmos/DTS-HA MA etc) audio?
That EVGA sound card ad... totally missed by not putting Steve in a squarish-modern armchair with a floor lamp next to him. (Aka, the Maxell "blown away" ad.)
Best they had was a cheap bluetooth sound bar and a folding ikea chair.... it looses something in translation.
This guy's voice and speech patterns remind me so much of NileRed. Half the video I was thinking, "Who does this sound like?!"
Edit: Apparently I'm not the only one that thought that! haha
This content is great as s lot of viewers will work as well
Who is this new voice? I feel bad for not knowing ... Steve is finally running out of hours in the day.
I believe his name is Rob and he's one of the writers/editors
@@enby-girl5020 -> 0:03 Rob Williams
Riley from LTT
probably making some videos to upload while they are headed to computex.
Computex is coming up, plus Rob sounds like the go to guy for workstation load review
Whenever I see Premiere Pro (or AE tbh) in a benchmark I know that it's software-bottlenecked. For real, it doesn't use more than 6-8 cores, use gpu only for certain effects and codecs. It's the worst at using a computers full performance (as confirmed by this video). Please also test some real high-end applications like DaVinci resolve, which eats GPU's for breakfast, or Lightroom image sequence rendering to TIFF16bit which uses every single CPU core you throw at it.
as a long time premiere and AE user i am very sad to have to agree with this comment :'( adobe really need to get their act together soon, cause this is just getting ridiculous. Im not completly sold on resolve as a viable option to AE when it comes to capabilities and available plugins and resources. but if they can't fix their rendering engine soon they are really gonna loose their relavance, cause rendertimes cost you too.
It'd be cool if you guys tested deep learning tasks within the GPU workstation test batch. Radeon VII's 16gb of VRAM probably makes it a good value against Nvidia cards.
Nice voice! I like it!
This sort of stuff really piques my interest. I guy Titan RTX if you want the best all rounder, Radeon VII if you need cheap.
Can you add some of these workstations tests to the test suite would be very interesting for when a new generation probably Navi launches
While the RTX 5000 is decent, but it honestly makes the Titan RTX look even better for not much more money. Titan once again is a really good card if it is something you actually needs.
The Titan doesn't have ECC and the certified drivers
@@Supcharged Yeah but I feel that it's only important for businesses. Regular people who do both gaming and any type of content creation would be extremely happy with a 2080ti or Titan RTX since it's as good if not better then the RTX 5000 in most tests.
So is it like gaming when you add a second card via NV link, SLI, or crossfire where you don't get perfect scaling? I've been looking for videos on this but I've had no luck.
I ordered a second used 1080ti to help out in some 3d work in blender because I figured that if it needs the extra performance to render it would utilize the second card because its just calculations. I also wonder if SLI would work great with brute forcing Ray Tracing since its on pascal now?