Shakib well within his rights to have Angelo Mathews timed out: Michael Vaughan
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- Angelo Mathews became the first batter to be timed out in the history of international cricket. Michael Vaughan & Simon Doull react to the dismissal, on Cricbuzz Live
#angelomathews #shakibalhasan #cwc23 #banvsl #worldcup #odiworldcup #2023worldcup #2023odiworldcup #srilanka #bangladesh
Watch more cricket videos - www.cricbuzz.c...
For more cricket updates and content - www.cricbuzz.c...
For more updates on cricket follow us on facebook -
/
Follow us on twitter to get cricket related news -
/ cricbuzz
If you enjoy this video - then LIKE & SHARE with fellow cricket fans. SUBSCRIBE to Cricbuzz channel for more stories around the game we love!
Can you also pin the video of him talking about Ravi Ashwin running out Jos Buttler. RR vs KingsXI. The video was on Cricbuzz.
No not really... These guys are not human...
Where was the common sense of these Lankans when Mustafizur Rahman was controversially dismissed in the Nidihas Trophy! 0:08
Shakib 100% right... Rules is Rules. Congratulations 🇧🇩
Butler was mankad by mathews
Sakib brought the karma against him
Michael Vaughan's view on Ashwin was different even when he was within his rights to use Mankad rule to out Butler😂
Khud p ati h tb moot nikal jati h inki.
Shakib 100% right...No 1 all-rounder in the world... Rules is Rules. Congratulations 🇧🇩
Remember when shakib was suspended from international cricket for doing absolutely nothing at all,?? where was sprit of the game?? and I remember Michael Vaughan was being such a harsh critic of shakib for not being able to comply with basic cricket rules...
Props to Michael Vaughan for being consistent and he rightly said someone as experienced as Mathews should be aware of this rather simple rule....
All that said I sympathize with Angelo , I wish we could conclude this game under better friendly circumstances
Michael Vaughan point is right…!Angelo should deal the matter in smart way…
He can’t walkway for change the helmet….🤥
@@rubelnet5253 He asked to request a helmet before ending 2 mints. You are saying to face to a baller with a broken helmet (No matter it is a spinner or a fast baller).
Let see in the future, how the cricket rules is applying to India as well. We saw how Koli is made his 49th hundred with a cheating DRS.
This is a shame. This is not cricket.
Imagine these guys response if this happened to Joe root? The English spirit will be on fire.
In Cricket ICC rules the following.... Mankeded, Hit wicket, Obstruction of field, Timed out, Run out, Stump out, Bowled, Caught, LBW as different instances where a batsman is legally out. Thats it.
.
No need to include alien things like sportsmanship in the ICC rules.
.
That you can use in your gully cricket if you are so fussy about it.
.
Cricket is decided by ICC and its umpires.... Not chatsters in YT.
😊😊😊
@@Seventh_Fail_hai_Wodiyes well said .period...this is professional sport at a world stage and not tapeball cricket. So get your gears and equipment in order.
Whether it happened to root, stem, leaf, branch, tree top etc. It is icc who has to answer. So you can sleep meanwhile.
.
Lately Rashid was run out by sri Lanka because he was out of crease. Did english cricket raise eyebrows??? Ok i agree you might have had leaked a little more seeing beautiful Rashid.
.
Get a beer 🍺🍺🍺 and chill yourself. 🤣🤣🤣
Imagine ur reaction if it was done by rohit sharma😂😂
Simon Doull didn't play for England... FYI
if run out of non-striker is called "Mankading" because Vinoo Mankad was the first player ever to appeal for such dismissal in an international match, then this should be called "Shakibing" 😂😂
not shakibing because surname of vinoo mankad was taken to make mankading so it should be called as ALHASANING🤣
In Cricket ICC rules the following.... Mankeded, Hit wicket, Obstruction of field, Timed out, Run out, Stump out, Bowled, Caught, LBW as different instances where a batsman is legally out. Thats it.
.
No need to include alien things like sportsmanship in the ICC rules.
.
That you can use in your gully cricket if you are so fussy about it.
.
Cricket is decided by ICC and its umpires.... Not chatsters in YT.
😊😊😊
@@IronMan-wp2po😂😂
Al hasaning
No..timed out is a rule for long time. Shakib never invented it.
Close to retirement, Angelo Matthews could not have asked for a better gift. He has been immortalized by this incident. His name will forever be remembered in cricket folklore.
Immortalized..... Do you first of all understand what that word is all About and where & why it is used. 🤣🤣🤣
Mathew’s 2014 wickets of butler
@@Seventh_Fail_hai_WodiIt means to preserve
As an idiot, yes.
Indian fans when ashwin does mankading :- its within the rules of the game.
Indian fans when shakib does the same : shame on shakib
Mankading is basically a runout. This here was a technical issue
Nagin dance party se aur kya expect Kar sakte hai ? International player hone ka maturity kabhi bhi nhi hoga.
Rule k chakkar me respect ko Hatao
😂😂😂 Indiots! 😂😂😂
In case of mankading the batter takes undue advantage but here batter is not getting any sort of advantage which can make an impact on result of the game... Get your logic right
Indian here and agree with the comment
When Ashwin does it's np but Shakib then it's bad
Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti hai
Sakib was right considering rules and wining pressure. If it was a bilateral series Sakib wouldn't do that
Listening to people who understand cricket is refreshing. Thank you for unbiased views.
So basically you’re saying the guy needs to put himself in danger to get the moral high ground. It’s not a makad or the Bairstow bullshit. It’s a safety issue.
What they are actually saying is if you’ve got a broken strap first go to the umpires and let them know if they don’t oblige inform the fielding skipper. Then if nothing works take on a slow left arm spinner for one ball with a broken stap in your helmet. You’ve only picked up on a part of what they said to dish them out.
If it is that much of a safety issue then why not check your helmet 😂
Then why not check your helmet before coming out to bat? I'm sure playing a slow left armer for 1 ball with a loose strap wouldn't have killed him.
Bro soo many people faced spinners without a helmet
It is not even about getting oneself in danger, Some Batsmen needs to have everything perfect before playing Ist ball, sometimes even a little strap left open, a button Undone can also put you off.. Angelo shouldn't hav been given out
What to expect from Vaughan😂
That's lack of Sportsmanship by banged desh
As a Bangladeshi i m ashamed for this stupid work, sorry to all cricket fans, plz dont think badly of all our people, even most of our people dont support the stupid work of our team
Hate sakib... Dark cricketer of the era
@decent_KH101 Pakistan se ho kya🤣🤣
@decent_KH101 then Bangladeshi the son of Pakistan
@decent_KH101 BHARAT the father of INDIA
@decent_KH101 Mathews ne sakib ka le li🤣🤣mazza aya
@decent_KH101 The father of father is father🤣🤣🤣what is this.... Are you 2nd pappu
Let's say if it was a fast bowler, are you now supposed to play without a helmet or risk getting time out? WTF?
Here he was facing Shakib not a fast bowler. Obviously a spinner can't hurt you. Completely agree with Simon and Micheal. If the same would have happened in case of fast bowler then yes agree with you but it wasn't that case.
All he had to do was pull out the bowlers run up. Then he could replace his helmet. In anycase i am not sure he was even at the crease within two minutes anyway, regardless of his helmet strap
He was taking wayyy too much time, he should know the rules
@@anupamdevburman6056 spinners have hit people on the head as well .. don’t think umpires made the right decision here
@@ebojfmdboojoh4023 the broadcaster showed 1 minute 55 seconds .. if he took too long originally, then ok
Finally the experts are talking like experts
Imagine Ben stokes getting timed out had Vaughan been saying same thing
Damn right man 😅
All u people had forgotten what Mathew did back on 2014
Damn fcuking wrong
Shakib 100% right...No 1 all-rounder in the world... Rules is Rules. Congratulations 🇧🇩
I think Vaughan is pretty pissed off at Stokes at the moment. With the contract issue and the lacklustre performance of the England team. I think he would have agreed with Shakib and on top of that, asked for Stokes to be dropped permanently.
If michael vaughan and simon doull are saying shakib was well within his right to have Angelo Mathews timed out, then greg chappell and trevor chappell shouldn't have been criticised all this time for the underarm bowling as well
Shakib 100% right...No 1 all-rounder in the world... Rules is Rules. Congratulations 🇧🇩
@@sajibhossain6686 watch the rules change after this....especially if it happens to India or Australia.
@@sajibhossain6686😂
Under arm bowling is against the rules whereas time out is within the ICC cricket rules since around a century!!!
underarm bowling was not against the rules when that incident happened
Vaughan is saying all thls but absolutely no one expects to get timed out and its ridiculous that the laws of the game allows you time out someone that broke a piece of their equipment
Rules are to be followed 🤷
Shakib 100% right...No 1 all-rounder in the world... Rules is Rules. Congratulations 🇧🇩
Matthews disrespected the law and the spirit of the game by not asking the opposition or the umpires
1. Why would you come to bat with a helmet that you didn't even check beforehand?
2. Why would you take that much time to get ready to bat?
3. If you have any problem in getting ready to bat (while it's causing slow over rate) why won't you ask the bowler if he can wait a little?
4. Why don't you just play those few balls without that helmet? The bowler was Shakib who's a spinner!
It's laughable that a man who had these faults was talking about "common sense"!!
Needing a helmet to play a spin bowler for mattews is the real joke.
Michieal vaughon understood he is really legend.. 🥰🥰🥰love From Bangladesh
shakib's decision may be legal.. but it was a disgraceful.
Anything which is legal action can not be disgraceful.
Bhai dekh wo uski Marzi hai and rules follow Kiya.
Legal and Disgraceful cant go together in any competitive sports
if this is legal then its not disgraceful . its the fact .
@@champasama6839Many things are fool. Like dictatorship laws and sedition laws.
Who thinks that SHAKIB did the right thing like me. 👇
Vaughan and Doul are completely missing the point with their spirit of the game examples. Examples of fielders bouncing the ball and batsmen walking on the middle of the pitch are INTENTIONALLY doing it to take an ADVANTAGE. The same goes for non-striker walking before the ball release. Here he is not taking an advantage nor doing it intentionally.
In that case when batsmen try to defend a ball and it goes for a boundary of the outside or inside edge they are not doing that INTENTIONALLY most of the times same case when a batsman hits a straight drive and it hits the bowler and ricochets off to the stumps. None of the aforementioned things are done INTENTIONALLY to take ADVANTAGE. In a cricket match you don't plan for such things you have to take a momentary decision whether to appeal or not
@@vigneshwarnaganathan5016 this is not logical.... all other examples of incidents you mentioned happen when sporting activity is going on, but I. This case timed out happens when the sporting activity is paused, so it doesn't give any advantage to batter
Vaughan did start by saying that the spirit of the game is broken every match.
I would love to see the same discussion from these guys and everyone else if he had got hurt on the 1st ball.smh
You think shakib would've bowled a bouncer or what? 😂
that time shakib bowling , most batsman play spiner without halmet , its very easy face one ball, fair discussion
Ever Heard of a sweep shot genius. during that there is always a threat of having head injury even against spinner
@@WaveRider1989
and just because you guys are bangladeshi or whatever, stop leaning your mind this shallow that you are defending something that whole cricket community is against for.
@@WaveRider1989
Everything is right for Indians not for others 😊
That comment made my head bubble 😜
India always the victims!
I remember that in 2014, after English batsman Josh Buttler was Mankud Out, he told the then Sri Lankan captain Angelo Mathews about it, but Mathews did not listen to Buttler. Then why Shakib will listen to you today!!!
History Repeats itself..
bro you left out the important part where that mathews had warned him 2 times before the incident .
If there was Virat Kohli instead of Anjelo Mathews and if Virat Kohli went through the same scenario what would the umpires do? 🤔🤔🤔 I wonder 🤨
Undoubtedly he will be given out
ikr IMAGINE...
Undoubtedly, Shakib and Co. would be thrown out of the WC!
@@anchalsharma2714 they would've experienced hell like conditions around them
same thing when ashwin did within the rules, he questioned
In Cricket ICC rules the following.... Mankeded, Hit wicket, Obstruction of field, Timed out, Run out, Stump out, Bowled, Caught, LBW as different instances where a batsman is legally out. Thats it.
.
No need to include alien things like sportsmanship in the ICC rules.
.
That you can use in your gully cricket if you are so fussy about it.
.
Cricket is decided by ICC and its umpires.... Not chatsters in YT.
😊😊😊
@TumhareLiyeKafhiHai how much time is timed out
@@drnitlix 2 minutes. Because ICC says the least time taken to cook a dish is 2 minutes. In that much time umpires and fielders can make maggi. 🤣🤣🤣
If Sakib had did this to Virat in this world cup, Indian fans wouldn't allow the Bangladesh team to return to Bangladesh alive!
It’s the same as saying as Israel is within its rights to bomb Palestinians
Michael Vaughan and Simon Doull would have a different take on this if NZ or England were at the receiving end of this meanness.
Vaugan is biased he would have not say this if it was English batsmen
Bangladesh losing their respect
As a Bangladeshi i m ashamed for this stupid work, sorry to all cricket fans, plz dont think badly of all our people, even most of our people dont support the stupid work of our team
Is there a time limit for the bowling/fielding team? If so, Shakib is entitled to do the time out. If they couldn't finish in time, would they not be penalized?
yea, bangladesh would have to pay a fine and also have a fielder inside the circle for the last few overs.
Shakib was right by appealing for the time-out
Obviosuly vaughn will take cheater side , England won the game just like that utilising a flawed rule
When?
@Michael Vaughan - Would you have said the same thing, if Bell was not allowed to bat by Indian team after given RUN NOT; Dhoni/Team were well within their right of "Rules of the Game!!" Experienced Bell should have known that 4 is a 4 only after Umpire declares it
The absolutely baffling fact is that they say that SL appeal "spirit of the game" and all tht but the fact is this isnt that it was a SAFETY ISSUE...the risk is far too great and that is exactly why mathews asked for another helmet because it broke down AT THE CREASE. And then the fact is these people say bairstows wicket in the ashes(which carey stumped) is 'not in the spirit of the game" and all that which is true but that is lawfully OUT..(so just imagine if THIS happened to an english batsmen what their response would be).......but THIS is totally different and it is just mindnumbingly sad that ppl cannot understand the difference between the two...
um when do u need a helmet to face a spinner? if u dont have guts to even face spinner without helmet u shouldnt play cricket
This is a shame for Bangladesh
Before Bangladeshis starts pointing their filthy fingers towards India and Ashwin, Mankading and Timed out are two completely different scenarios.
When it comes to Mankading, The batsman in the non-striker end is getting an unfair advantage as he is more likely to avoid the run out, whereas when it comes to Timed out, there is no unfair advantage coming into play.
But I won't say that Bangladesh or Shakib has brought any disgrace to anything, They are the disgrace!
I mean there is lol... If a batsman is taking more time then there'll ve problem with the slow overates
In 2014, when Mathews was captain, George Buttler was mancadded by Sananayaka, but Mathews did not withdraw it. Shakib is right & its effect Champions Trophy Qualifier is the context so nothing wrong there
Shakib 100% right...No 1 all-rounder in the world... Rules is Rules. Congratulations 🇧🇩
@@sajibhossain6686lauda mera rulws he was there 10 seconds before. if his helmet broke then u want him to get hit in head
@@shabkhet-lo3mo how did you know bro? See official 4th umpire explained on icc official video.
Disgraceful and Wrong decision - He was on pitch within permissible time of 120 seconds. Poor umpiring. Bangladeshi's have right to make an appeal but it's umpire's responsibility to keep an eye on the watch. His helmet's strap came off while taking the guard and he cannot risk his life due to an equipment malfunction so technically he was not out. Bangladeshis always stooped low in gentlemen's game.
Why does your studio extend invitations to individuals with a history of racist behaviour, such as Michael Vaughan? It is crucial to exercise caution when engaging with such individuals due to their potential for manipulation. It appears that Mr. Vaughan's motivation for participating with your team is primarily financial. His critique of international cricketers, particularly Asian players, seems to be rooted in England's subpar performance and their failure to showcase their best cricketing skills. Some might view him as akin to Shakib Al Hasan, both criticized for unethical conduct and regarded as unsuccessful in their endeavours.
ICC have to do something about these 'rules'
You can't have 'rules' that apparently go against the "spirit of the game"
And besides that, bowling teams get penalised because of slow over rate quite harshly.
And so the bowling team only appealed, almost casually and after the umpires got confirmation, they gave the decision which was even cleared up by the fourth umpire during the innings break.
Really not a big fan of this sort of dismissals but the way Mathews and co. is portraying Shakib to be this villain is just ridiculous.
Oh he is the villain alright - ONLY time in 128 years because no one else would even dream of stooping so low - he was turning to face at 1:54 and strap broke (see time stamps from catch to strap break) = equipment malfunction (what was 4th Umpire looking at?)..... I am an Aussie and had nothing but praise for the Bangladesh team - this one action has tainted them - just like Chapples underarm this will never be forgotten - rest of your comment is obviously correct ... ie stupid rule/punishment
After Phil Hughes episode,is it sin to take time for proper helmet, what being expressed by MV is not ethical,what Shakib did was very bad but the role of Ground umpire was worst, Ignorance is a bliss and that should be applied here,Be sporty MV
You missed something. He just simply asked for extra time to the umpire and opposition captain by explaining his situation. What he did was : saw an issue, took decision all by himself and applied it. opposition captain and umpire were like : am i a joke?
Just because BD did it you are calling it unethical
If IND did this you would say it's within the laws
You guys are pure shit
Did you really just compare a slow left arm bowler to a 150 kph pacer?
Absolutely right Vaughny! If its legal in cricket, and you can appeal to the umpires and they give it out, whats the issue here? Even few years ago mankading was not deemed true to the spirit of the game and then Sri Lanka and Indian players (esp Ashwin) started doing it on regular basis and now its a norm! Just because it hasnt happened doesnt mean it shouldnt happen. Use your common sense people.
What are these guys talking about? Not to get you started on the Spitit of the game?? And, time saving - Did we end up saving the time? Mathews was there the entire time! He signaled the dressing room. And, if Shakib (A here to zero) and Co. had an issue, they could have gone to Mathews and Umpires and clarified. And yes, asked umps to stop the clock. That's it!!
Where is the common sense in their laughable logic that Mathews as a batter should plead around everyone to get his equipment changed? And the funniest part - he could have have faced one ball first 😅 So you are effectively saying he can't sweep on the first ball. Keepers are not allowed to keep to spinners without a helmet and Sky does sweep spinners from the word go.
Game awareness?? How on earth a batter could possibly know he would have have all his PROTECTIVE equipments 100% functional all the time. And FYI TO SO CALLED PUNDITS, wardrobe malfunction even happens in a fashion show!
Such a shame! More so these former captains supporting they would have done the same - shows how hollow there careers have been that they would cling to every last one of the dirtiest deed as long as it's not punishable by selling their soul!
So sorry that it happened to a veteran like Mathews! Even listening to this "below the belt" support of these english panelists my heart is all for the "spirit of the game" and incidents like Dhoni calling back Bell!!!!
This sense of hyper professionalism is something I hate in any workplace. Have common sense. We aren’t robots. Dumb analysts.
vaughan is supporter of pakistan now he is supporting bangladesh something like muslim brotherhood
😂😂😂
Racist fck Mediocres giving opnion doesn’t matter to me !! As Indian I feel bad fr Mathews !! Players end up dead due to hardball ? Have u seen what happen to aga Salman when he was facing a spinner ?? he got raccoon eye ?? His quipment his responsibility ? He was there before 2 mins at crease bt then his quipment faulty it’s his fault ?? It can happen with anyone !! Rules should have common sense too !!
Shameless act ❗️
His helmet was broken. You expect a batsman to play with a malfunctioning helmet? Cheap attitude from a cheap team
I think Michael Vaughan doesn't watch enough cricket because his idea of playing the first ball from a slow left arm spinner is pathetic. I remember in an exhibition all stars ll match Shoaib Akhtar came without a helmet because he thought it's a spinner why would he need a helmet? But when the bowler bowled the ball,, it took an awkward bounce and it nearly missed Shoaib's chin. It was a close shave. Here Mr. Vaughan is giving preference to the law above the safety of a human being.
Total stupidity from these two. You can't judge the situation sitting inside room .. Angelo never thought this could happen in such situations and think for his safety first .. If this being a qualifier match then you can think to do this to get advantage but you are already out of this worldcup .. No sportsmanship totally disgraceful cricket from Bangladesh player.
This timed-out is in the rules,why bring the spirit of game into the scene.
At international level players shouldn't be casual in their behaviour like Mathews who didn't inform umpires before going to change his helmet,it was his fault not the other way around.
Ok he is saying play the first ball with broken helmet first ball ,then what if bowler bowls a bouncer or spin bowl turned to his head then concussion takes place see batsmen is playing for cricket not for life so he checked for safety measures ,remember philp huges incident 😢 so its not spirit of the game by bangladesh , rules are rules ,if being rules followed strictly i think 50% of cricket games should be recheck , some rules should be changed 1) upmires call 2) timed out is ok with proper reason 3) over behind its a game not a war
Absolutely disgraceful that these so called experts have chosen Shakib's side. See, when the spirit of the game is considered, we have to keep the actual rules on the sidelines a lil bit. Did Mathews go wrong when he didn't first ask Shakib about it, yes, but should he have been given out, absolutely not.
Lets talk about spirit.what about ashwins mankad Against Buttler?
What nonsense. The rules should ALWAYS come first.
Shakib is number 1 all-rounder of the world, whatever he deicides always gets right.
Supporters of Indian Cricket like yourself have no right to be champions about the spirit of the game when you guys clearly show lack of it over and over again. Stfu!
Shakib 100% right...No 1 all-rounder in the world... Rules is Rules. Congratulations 🇧🇩
Rip spirit of cricket SHAME ON SHAKIB
Men’s cricket is a gentlemen’s game. It is a low blow for spirit of the game.
Thanks mr. Vagun and mr. Simon for understanding the reality.
Sitting in a drawing room on a comfy sofa, making it feel like Matthews was stupid
If that happens to a NZ or Eng players then the story would be different...
So are these guys saying that batters in future should face the first ball even if their equipment is faulty? Will they have to face a fiery fast bowler with a faulty helmet just out of fear of being given timed out?
Angelo didn't face the first ball out of professional trust that such a thing like appeal for timed out won't happen. The trust was broken today.
I also believe that there's a complete breakdown of the relationship between Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. They have no respect for each other. They should play a friendship series or something.
What is there to discuss about it?
Of course sakib has the right to do that, but Matthews also has every right be upset about it and say thise things. 😂😂
How can anyone appeal this?
Srilanka-Bangladesh rivalry extended, maybe good for cricket's for both these countries testosterone crowd
It's good for business 🙃
The commentary I read said he had asked the bangers captain!! What the real story then!
Its all within the law of the game for these guys, until an English batsman is given out in this fashion
Don't accept this rule or today's decision ..
Would they still say so, had Mathews been hit on the head because of the broken helmet?? The so called exoert🤔
I hope Michael Vaughan will say same thing when england player or team will be in limelight in such situations.
you mean like Angelo Mathews did with Jos Butler's mankad out?
@@tasnimshahid8571 Yes if england was involved, vaughan might take their team's side and not rules.
I was under the impression you had two minutes to reach the pitch, once out there you were all good. I have seen many batsmen rush out to the pitch while still putting pads on after losing a few quick wickets in local cricket. They were thinking the same, get out there and you can finish getting yourself ready. He is unlucky I guess, the Bangers are taking no prisoners with that appeal.
Shakib is well within his right 👍
Matter is not what your guys are talking about. Problem is who has had the timer to prove that he spent 2 minutes and was the appeal came before or after the two minutes tome period
Shakib and Angela have been pals over the years, Shakib decides whatever always gets right.. If u question of team-spirit, Angela is also an experienced campaigner, where his cricketing knowledge to bat within 2 minutes despite being so experienced..
Spirit of the game is to best ensure that the loopholes around the laws aren’t misused, and to show comradeship whilst being competitive. Both Michael and Simon, are thinking in binary.
they are not. they are saying mathews should have ask shakib or umpire. he made a mistake
@@enigma2336 buddy. when was the last time such a thing a happened in cricket? Never? Can anyone ever be prepared for such a thing? Highly unlikely. Common Sense should prevail. Shakib wasn’t being overly competitive, but showed Malice!
@@dan_savageMathews didn't ask the umpire or Shakib it's his fault not the other way around
@@enigma2336exactly
But he didn't use a loophole even though it's rare
The law is not worth more than the lives of the players... what are they talking about?? "Safety first"😂
from a slow left arm spinner's ball, a threat of life for a loose strap in the helmet ?
Is he made out of candle ? Too dramatic
So.. you give a rule to ICC that helmet is not required when spinners bowling ... It too dramatic..
I am not surprised vaughn doesn't find anything wrong with this.
I don't agree with Mr Vaughan. Bangladesh wouldn't be in disadvantage if the batter was changing a broken equipment. Allowances would be given to Bangladesh. Factually incorrect comments made here.
Mathews picks the wicket of Shakib and taps his hand signaling "Time's up" for shakib 😉
This is the best explanation and discussion on this matter and people need to understand this.
Their solution about asking Shakib is ridiculous. Let's say Angelo asks them and Shakib agrees and then appeals, he will still be within the rules of the game to be given out. The only solution is this case was for Angelo to have played one ball and then dealt with it. Unlucky for him and Lanka they were handed over this punishment
Don't cry now when England is at receiving end in the name of spirit of the game Mr. Vaughan.
The rules for others not for india
What if Angelo Mathews decides to sweep the first ball, do you think proper wear of the helmet is still not required before his first ball?
why didn't he ask shakib or umpire. his fault
Lol, he did ask to reconsider their decision. Shakib didn't withdraw his appeal, so the umpires declared him to be out.
Rule is Rule. its appreciating that the rule applied and Shakib remembered that unique rule. Before Shakib appeal Umpire was responsible to apply this rule.
shakib was following rule
Lankans are crying every where
Shakib is a loser for rest of his life 😅
ইংলিশ আমি বুঝি না.... 😤
Will the bangladesh captain timeout virat kohli.....Ben Strokes...Williamson....Steve Smith....
Very poor discussion by Simon Doul....
❤❤❤❤ love the guests' reply
Michael is right
What shakib did may be against the spirit of the game but the fact that angelo mathews allowed this to be happened to him is way beyond stupid. I am more angry on his stupidity
Rule is rule❤️❤️🇧🇩
😂😂 looser
And common sense is not so common I guess.
It’s not like Matthews was gaming the system and deliberately delaying the game to put the opposition out of rhythm. These rules are there for that reason only. There was a genuine issue with the equipment and common sense should be exercised and Matthews shouldn’t have been issued with a dismissal.
How do you know he wasn't gaming the system?
@@almahmud6992 it was a mishap, equipment broke…do you think he would deliberately break it just to put the opposition off its rhythm?
Then one thing Mr. Vaughan, If Shakib is within rules, then why did you spoke against Ashwin?He was also within rules.
If you consider SLOW OVER RATE FINE and FIELD RESTRICTIONS, this incident is within law. Matthus failed to prove professionalism, he could ask to Fielding Captain to replace his helmet, even could ask to umpire, but he didn’t. Thanks!
Shakib❤️❤️❤️
So captain can make one out and not out? This is not in shakibs hand. It was law.. What's wrong following law.. Shakib is getting blamed for following law..does that mean law is against spirit of the cricket..? Emotional junk Mathew.. His career is timed out..
Thesetwoguysaredefendingtheindefensibleandtheyaretaikingnonsensetheydonotknowthewordsportanship
The reason i believe Shakib was at fault here is because umpires asked him two times if he wanted to withdraw the appeal and he said NO.
Bcz Ban team mankaded a NZ player and later they also call him back for so called "spirit of the game" which costed them very expensive boundaries
I think michael vaughan did not WATCH THE MATCH😂😂😂 BROTHER batsman reached the crease before 3min. As in the rule book....helmet broke in the crease...
You seriously give ur opinion without watching the match lol....
Timed out alongside Mankad are against the spirit of the game
Nonsense.
Timeout and mankad are well within the spirit of the game
Both rules are in the laws of the game. So, every player/captain has the right to exercise that. Simple suggestion if people don't want to see such things is that batters should come on time and non striker should be inside the crease. As simple as it is.
@@aniruddhamungekar8663 I have learned only one spirit of the game which is playing within the laws of the game and shaking hands after the game. That's it.
@@anupamdevburman6056 yeah bro .
These 2 rules are there for some reason.
Without mankad the Non striker can run half the pitch before the ball is bowled .
And without Timeout Batsman can enter the ground after even half an hour after the previous batsman is dismissed.
If bowlers obliges to the discipline of bowling behind the crease line
And if he goes even an mm forward the crease line is penalized with No Ball .
The Batters should do they same accept the rule as it is rather than being a cry baby
@@aniruddhamungekar8663 i know they are the rules of the game but what if it happens in a world cup final, what then
why she is hosting this show?