Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts - Yamato And A Half
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 лис 2019
- 3 triple 18 inch guns? Pfff. Go bigger or go home. We're building Yamato baby, only bigger, better and much more deadly.
Mission: The Modern Battleship
Get the game here: www.dreadnoughts.ultimateadmi...
=============================
Social/support
----------------------------------------------------------
Gain monthly perks by supporting me on Patreon: / stealth17gaming
Livestreams: / stealth17gaming
Join my Discord: / discord
Send in your Wargame replays: www.stealth17gaming.com/send-m...
=============================
Patreon Supports
Colonel Brendryen
Lt Colonel Elfwyn
Major Moleeman
Major Carbohydrate
Major Weber
Major Chung
Major Metzger
Captain Morscher
Captain Meyer
Captain Jack
Captain Tam
Captain Pulliam
Captain Iceman
=============================
Cheers,
Stealth - Ігри
![Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts - The Super Bismarck (Alpha 10) [Battleship]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HtlWvbz7Rws/mqdefault.jpg)
Admiral: We need a new ship with marine diesel engines.
Architect: ok.
Admiral: it needs to run on coal.
Architect: *visible confusion*
*visible confusion*
Sir, I’m an Architect
Shipwright: God the admirals drunk again.
Diesels original prototype used coal dust as fuel and coal-water slurry can be used in even modern industrial diesel engines with relatively modest modifications.
Why an architect, why not engineer?
"The Yamato had 3 of these gun... I have 5" the BIGGEST flex
9 guns 3 turrets. 15 guns 5 turrets.
@@malnutritionboy
15 main guns...overkill.
I read “I have 5" as “I have 5 inch"
Captain of the Alfonso(to the gun crews): DO YOU SEE THAT DREADNOUGHT?
Crew: Aye sir!
Captain: *I DON'T WANT TO*
*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*
*FIREEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!*
@@paulfrancistorres7144 Meanhile the deck crew of the enemy dreadnought: what are those bright lig- AH FUGK
18 inch shells: prepare for surprise butt $ex
@@warbirdgaming8091 Would be more like - ''Cosa sono quelle lu* AAAAAA'' :) And on the Alfonso - ''Disfruten que muchachos calientes de pasta'' :D
Itsa mea Alafonso-a
"We don't even know what we're firing at"
Wreckage. You were firing at wreckage.
That cruiser went up like the HMS Hood
He did that TWICE. TWICE
Yes!
Which one?
My great-grand uncle fought on the ship....he was the spotter...responsible for spotting incoming targets...rip
Too soon.
20:32 Witness the last moment of a cruiser captain's life before a nuke hit on top of his head.
Jesus christ, that is overkill and a half...
Thatsa Lotta Damage...
@Victor Wilson FLEX TAPE CAN'T FIX THAT
@Victor Wilson WE'LL NEED FLEX SEAL FOR THIS
How did he destroy the rudder with a hit amidships damn
The Alfonso XIII super battleship, the top secret weapon of the Spanish navy and why UK was so keen on keeping Spain neutral in WWII.
"Alfonso-class, The Pride of Spanish Armada."
@@hanselsihotang NOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH ARMADA-QUISITION!
@@airplanemaniacgaming7877 "Pride of a Nation, a Beast made of steel...", Wait wrong ship.
THE BISMARCK IS NO MATCH FOR THE ALFONSO XIII! NOW SPANISH SCIENCE IS THE GREATEST IN THE WORLD!
There was actually a Spanish dreadnought named Alfonso XIII, of the España Class. Although in reality it only displaced 17000 t, not 90000 lol
About your ship from this video, I can say this: "when you have fifteen eighteen-inch guns in the broadside under the control of a good fire control system, they do not report contacts, they report destroyed opponents!"What to do, here instead of accuracy, statistics begin to work...
that cruiser blowing up was just like the Hood when she went up. Fireball hundreds of feet in the air.
and only 2 survivors..........if even for that cruiser!
You all might think coal-fueled diesel engines are a ridiculous thought, but "diesel" is, first and foremost, an ignition technique, named for it's inventor. Engines that use this technique - heat generated by the compression of the fuel and air inside the cylinder - can, however, be made to run on pulverized coal. The much greater surface area of coal dust vs. an equal volume of coal in chunk form allows much more rapid combustion. Coal dust is, in fact, downright explosive.
Sailing broadside on to a battleship armed with 18inch guns? Thats a padallin
I'm Gay Ayy, a Mighty Jingles reference! Now THAT’S a paddlin’!
The benefit of the secondary tower being directly behind the main tower is so the funnels go behind so the smoke does not decrease accuracy from da towers
Al: Hey DD wanna see a magik trick? You will disappear in a blink of an eye
DD: Hell yea... Wait wtf!
One shell man!!!
thats what i call a thanos shell
And so, the Alfonsso class battleships became the catalyst for naval air power, for they were otherwise unstoppable.
*Laughs in Carrier*
If we get aa in this game
Alfonso will be even more deadlier
With radar and other equipments the aa’s will fill the skies with bullets with the accuracy of a sniper rifle
@@zagreus1249 There's nothing you can fit on a single ship to stop a determined aerial attack
Overtoast
Its a game
Not real life
Probably some stupid shit might happen
Or maybe some lucky shots
@@zagreus1249 if they go for realism, a large enough air attack will gut the ship, even with amazing AA
That sort of broadside could probably be heard on the Richter magnitude scale!
Here we see the super battleship Alfonso XIII. Perhaps the single most powerful and dangerous ship ever built.
Excepy for the one made later by @History Guy Gaming, WHICH IS THE EXACT NUMBER OF GUNS AND EXTERIOR DESIGN! (Except for a few differences I forgot.)
wyland nares l
Petty Officer (U.S Navy)( Sees allot of lights in the sky in the day): what are those Captain?
Captain: BRACE FOR IMPACT!!!!
Nothing happens
I imagine small shells can still kill and wound crew? What are the chances of that happening?
@RyanJosepher small very small
34:39 My face when 15 18" shells going straight toward my little dingy
What on earth are destroyers trying to accomplish by getting into a firefight with a BB with greater armor, greater range, and greater firepower? You'd think if they were brave enough to do that, they'd at least make an effort to try to swarm in and get at least one torpedo salvo each.
Are they trying to snipe the crew through the windows on the BB's island?
They're obviously WoWS DD mains lmao
@@kurumi394 as a DD main i can tell you i send in my torps as soon as i know they are in range
obv, they have snipers onboard, duh
Brave Italians sailing to their death, to try and save the Italian navy from the mighty Alfonso XIII
o7
Me looking at those extra spaces for turrets: you have 18 inch and 7 inch guns already, why don't you put some AAA there?
The next moment: more secondary
Very fitting that we get Yamato as intro card indeed, you're gonna die to waves of aircrafts
There aren't any AA guns in this game nor aircraft... :/
@@thebushwolf710 There will be, according to a post on Steam Forums, but it won't be a thing on release day either. My assumption is that we're getting them by 2021
@@hanswang7891 Still, no need to think about that if its going to be something in the far future. But if that still is the case than I cant wait for Aircraft carriers :D
For the AA variant, just replace those 7" guns with 5" DP guns and give them VT fuze shells. Throw up an impenetrable wall of explosive death.
@@zuthalsoraniz6764 why not keep them as 7 inch and just make new AA ammo?
I hope they add CV's to the game so you can actually make the yamato but with a much better AA armament and get rid of it's only weakness
I don't think more AA guns will help. Though, maybe we can have Yamatos protected by two Shinano!
@@ziavanzaa.r6335 that was literally her biggest weakness. She didnt have any mid range AA guns so there was a window where aircraft attacking the ship were basically safe.
@@MudkipsAreEpicWin yes, but then we have to accept the fact that, even with more amount of AA guns, the ones shootings are still human. Not fire systems. And, no matter how many amount of AAs, she was still swarmed with a lot of planes that a gunner could not handle. AA probably won't matter, but air superiority will be the winning game.
Yep, imagine the amount of AA fire this ship, but with every single secondary slot housing a triple 5" turret firing proximity-fuzed HE shells would put out. Not to mention the insane number of Bofors guns that would fit on her!
@@ziavanzaa.r6335 I never said more AA, I said a better set up. She still had a pretty fearsome AA setup, not to mention AAA was never very effective at actually shooting down planes to begin with. Sometimes you get a hit, usually it just scares the fuck out of the pilot, which can cause them to miss their drop.
WG: Alright bois we've found a new blueprint for a paper SN BB
The story of the legendary battleship
Alfonso XIII
"there seems to be something wrong with our bloody ships today" intensifies
"I''m not going to put too many secondary guns on this."
Yeah ok
When placing turrets the keys R & T can be used to rotate them, so you could rotate that centre turret using R & T but like everything in the game its glitchy.
If you need more weight and have funds, use Semi Oil or Oil as it's a lot lighter than coal bunkers. I do this at times and it can really help if you need 500+ tonnes extra.
Four single barrels, pretty but useless. Classic Italian design.
But all those cannons would ruin the beautiful lines and weigh them down when they need to run away or switch sides
Well of course, all those cannons would just ruin the beautiful lines and weigh them down when they might need to run away or switch sides
@@weldonwin Italy did not switch sides, it's a common misconception. I can explain it to you if you want.
@@anzacwashington7050 Firstly, suing for peace is different from surrendering. Secondly, whilst it is true that the Head of State did not change, you have to remember that Italy was a parliamentarian monarchy, where power was held by Parliament and the PM, not the Monarch. Therefore, to state that the political line of Italy should have stayed the same after Mussolini was overthrown would be erroneous, as it would imply that it was decided by the Monarch and not by Parliament. Lastly, while it is true that the Italian army was badly equipped in both world wars, I feel like its contribution is highly underestimated, as the British like to do with other nations. If on one hand the Italian army was outmatched by the Austrian one in ww1, on the other hand it still managed to hold a large portion of the Austrian army and four German divisions, which after 191ü could have been used to break the Western front open (there were only 10000 americans there at the time, the main body of reinforcements was yet to come). As for ww2, the fact that the Maori battalion was outnumbered is of marginal importance to me: the British troops on the African front were equipped with heavy artillery and tanks which the Italian troops were not capable of piercing, thus making the Italian numerical advantage useless. On the other hand, Italian and German troops were badly supplied, especially in regards of Rommel's Afrikakorps, as most supplies were directed towards the Eastern front. Italian troops were still capable of proving themselves fighting, like in the battle of El Alamein, where the division "Folgore" was finally destroyed after 3 days of combat, during which the soldiers hid in the sand with Molotov's and jumped on Matildas passing by to blow them up, or in the Easter front, where the mountaineer divisions (Alpini) were encircled by the Russians and fought their way out of the pocket.
@@anzacwashington7050 Italy was very much not an absolute monarchy, be it as a constitutional one (Statuto Albertino) or with parliament overruling the king, but the decision were very much not taken by the king alone. For example, prime Minister Giolitti before ww1 had a plan to prevent Italy from entering the war: Parliament would rule that Italy was to stay neutral, the king would abdicate (so as to be freed from the promise made in the London Pact of 1915), thus making the new king free to let parliament do its bidding. As for Italian leadership in ww2, I do agree that it was bad, save from a few cases, as most generals were nominated not because of their skill, but their loyalty to the regime.
There was something bloody wrong with the AI's ships that day.
Those destroyers held off until the main battle force was destroyed, instead of closing it for a torpedo attack. And using 12 cm guns at 10 km range? Against that monster? Close in for the kill, overwhelm the defences. That was a lemming train of World of Tanks proportions.
57thorns that's the way I'd play it. Hell if the torpedoes didn't hit I'd order the DD's to ram it. I'm probably going to lose them anyway so may as well
spacewolf6 Panic does that to even the stoutest captains, after all, something you never met, Firing shells so heavy that the “Battleships” of your convoy are almost detonated with HE shells....terrifying.
I understood that reference
@@firestorm165 I don't think they would get that close. He was killing everything within 10km with one salvo. Five DDs are not bullrushing that beast for a ram, they won't last.
.the only chance they had was torps at maximum range....but even if you slowed down the bear, his fire control and 18's just ruin your day
If it had cage masts you could have called it a Tillman 4-2
Aka The USS Second Amendment Rights
weldonwin I liked to call it the Freedom Bringer Battlewagon.
@@USMValor-jc5xu Or if you are into Warhammer 40K the USS *WAAAAAAAAAAGHHH!!!*
What I'm hoping we see in the future, is To see when ships get turrets damaged or Destroyed, We See guns Jammed in postion, plus, when detonated, shrapnel flies about, plus, I already Have seen it in previous videos, but, ships possibly more dynamically split, I can understand that can cause problems with frames, but Think of it like, wherever the ship was detonated, that section now is missing.
If you want an idea of what it was like to fight at sea in WWII i suggest Neptune's Inferno by Hornfischer. In short, terrifying.
So in conclusion, despite the air power... the Alfonso is more powerful than the Yamato is self in BB vs BB wise :/
Am very well impressed, am speechless :)
Stealth: here come the pretty lights
Me: yeah pretty lights of doom
Every 18" shot is like getting hit with Thors Hammer
I have a VERY important question!: Is there a follow camera for shells?! If not, PLEASE recommend this to the devs!
This is still my favorite of your videos. I'd give a lot of money to have a scale model of the Alfonso.
It's also my most watched video ever.
I wonder if they'll add campaign where we get to alter the events of WW2. Build a mega ship for Germany or Japan and turn the tide against the British and American fleets etc. Or vise versa and sink Bismarck before he can sink Hood
Imagine a campagin where naval airpower never took off. So with CV's being primarily recon platforms, imagine what the secondary batteries are gonna be like.
@@Sorain1 well the Battleship would remain as the heart and shield of the fleet. They would just get bigger and bigger
@@phantomwraith1984 the bigger the better.
Tea and medals will be waiting back at port for that crew
Tea will be served on board once they have buffed that damaged barbette. But medals are always welcome.
Probably with a side of churros too.
They're Spanish, so Sangria and Medals
weldonwin with a side order of sopapilla cake
18.1” 460mm guns
13:00 So it's a Tillman with upgraded propulsion. :-D
You're one of the few Dutch YT's I can listen to without cringing too much on the English pronunciation :') . Nice vid.
Seems to be one of the few Dutch people who actually knows how to be human. I've known a few Dutch online and they turned into real pricks. High respect to Stealth for keeping things neutral while focusing on the game without going all SJW, as Dutch people are now known for doing.
I'm watching one video after the next from Stealth. +1
@@jensreimers6625 laughs in Québec
I couldn’t tell he’s Dutch
Hell, I thought it was an Irish accent
You could have follow your first idea of placing the secondary tower on the back and leaving the central turret in between the two towers, a more logical design and it might have helped with weight distribution.
Secondary towers don't weigh that much. Besides, the ship was perfectly balanced now
Also u could of put the funnels behind the second tower if u put that behind the main tower so the smoke from the funnels don’t get in the way
I wonder if they will add the crew as a factor to the game, after all, if HE shells will knock out the entire crew it does not matter if the ship is damaged
If it becomes too complicated then it'll become unplayable, as other games have become. I hope some things are kept simplified so you can hop in and play without too much stressing. But yeah, you're correct that a ship without a crew is just a husk.
@@ArcticuKitsu I agree that if it would be too complicated it won't appeal to the casual player, but I am sure they can make a very simple manpower factor like ships in total war games
HULL BREAK.
Second. Also truly a pinnacle of the world engineering. Engineers of Stealth Shipyard have outdone themselves again
I built the Ultimate Iowa class.....be interesting to see it go up against this.
After going around the tube and viewing other UA:D videos, I have to say that you're one of the better ones. I'm so glad that you know the terminologies and put actual care and effort into building the ships.... One of the UA-cam stared at the aft-torpedo and said "oh the auto builder put a tri-torpedo in the front!" And proceeded to suicide all 8 of his torpedo boats by driving them into the enemy BB thinking they have an angle to release the torps..... Sigh
Makarov The Plat Arch warhammer did a couple of vids on UA:D and they were great to watch as well. Like I said on his vid listening to his commentary was like listening to my old history teacher again. One part teacher, two parts storyteller and three parts comedian. I blame him for my utter obsession with history today
Tortuga's videos on this and Rule the Waves 1 and 2 are really good.
Who was it?
What if it was half a Yamato. UCHUUUUU SENKAN HALFATOOOOOO!!!!!
Wait till they shoot the positron shock cannons at the enemy fleet
26:35: One hit, one kill.
It occurs to me, that this could have been done much more cheaply with a poorly armored battlecruiser.
The captain of the Alfonso your cruisers cannot repel firepower of this magnitude
For me the Spanish version of yamato will be the most super weapon in the Spanish empire especially in a modern era for having a fire power in a highest level
Talk about implying the IJN doctrine of stuffing as much firepower into a single ship as can possibly fit.
30:21 just throw HE shellz.
People: Not all men love guns!
Me, an intellectual: if you don't love guns, you are not a man.
36:06 That's one hell of a 5" gun though... "at a range if a thousand kilometres..." 😳
NOW that’s a paddelin
YAMATOSTEIN!
or maybe FRANKENMATO...
"oooh that bounced off" *ship proceeds to go to brazil*
It’s super satisfying to watch ships get insta killed with the 18 inch AP salvo
Fuso class battleship I woulds say kinda resembling it tho.
Have a feeling your Chanel is about to blow up keep posting content on battleships plz. I found you on the first page of my suggestion page. You know with UA-cam how older videos randomly get a lot of love. Well that’s happening with you gl man.
Thanks for the info :). I've seen a big increase in views and subs lately.
26:39 it's over 9000!!!
Álvaro de Bazán is being proud of that battleship
This entire fight was the equivalent of clubbing seals.
23:45 moments before disaster cought on camera
Commander : The Alphonso XIII requires every crewmen to wear sunglasses at battlestations.
Sailor : For the sun ?
*Exploding BB in a distance flashes the whole ship and, for a second, shines so bright the sun itself goes to hide in shame. The sailor stands shaken.*
Commander : Not quite, son.
*Commander puts on sunglasses after ship explodes - CSI Miami theme starts*
@@Stealth17Gaming That's it, you just won my heart, I'm subscribing right here, right now.
I actually want to be on the Alfonso XIII when the guns go off, just to feel what it is like.
After the first few salvos, you'd prolly be almost willin to dive overboard to get away from them.
@@bubba9384 Might still be worth it
@@UtterlyShagged If you were close enough you would die from the shockwave, if not, your eardrums won't be feeling too good.
if the USS New York had 18 inch guns. This is basically what you did
Just bought this game. Can't wait to try it out.
Hope you'll like it!
In my personal opinion, a battleship should never sacrifice speed if the choice is between armour and armament, yeah, it shouldn't be to flimsy like the Kongos and it shouldn't be too soft knuckled like the Scharnhorsts but being able to dictate an engagement is key.
Agreed. In this game I've had the AI just run away from me one too many times. That's why I lean towards building faster battleships.
Would be fun now to see this as a close quarters fight.
I can't wait to play this game!
23:31 That poor cruiser 😂😂😂
You could put 18 in twin turret on each side can’t you ?
(Really like you content)
Yes I could have, but that would mean 1 less gun in broadside firing.
Something that seems weird to me is that the number of guns in a turret doesn't look like it changes the size of the turret. It changes it's displacement and cost, but that's it, having a single or double gun turret takes up the same deck space as a triple gun turret.
Stealth17 Gaming oh I see
Nutty31313 that true
@@Stealth17Gaming could you stagger them diagonally for cross deck fire, or is that just not allowed?
Incredibly impressive!!!
18' inch shells are a bitch to get hit by as the AI ships proved today, I wonder what the poor captains of those ships thought upon seeing the hail of doom heading towards their ships?
Even if every shot missed, the ship would still need to return to port for some bio clean up....
Reminds me of Warship Gunner 2. What a fun arcade game that was!
Light cruiser captain: ah lovey day to be out on ocean an-- (Explosion hit ship and rocking it to stern).
Battleship captain: ah we are fucking screwed soon!
It was like a pistol vs a nuke they never had a chance.
The BC that sunk to flooding looked like a fuso class
Shouldn't all or nothing armor reduce hull weight? At the very least it should be the lightest armor choice since it's not armoring the entire ship.
It does dosnt it? AoN adds weight only to the deck armour, while turtleback adds to the entire armour belt.
We don't even know what we are shooting at.
Turns out the worlds largest factory trawler was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
"At a range of a thousand kilometers, it has four point nine inches of penetration."
O_O That DD has a railgun! (I know, I know, but funny verbal mistake anyway.)
23:44 Italian Captain: Mama? *(KABOOM!!!)*
wonder how well a battleship with an armor belt made of tungsten rather than steel would perform tungsten is much more heavy than steel but its also leaps and bounds stronger under both tension and compression than steel, you'd have been able to make the belt much thinner than it would be if made from steel while still retaining the same amount of protection
The Alfonso seems to be what happens when the Spanish empire doesn't spend all the treasure they stole from the new world in one place.
Conquering new lands from cannibals for Christianity isn't stealing. 🤗
20:27 I yelled this pretending to be the ship's captain:
*HIT THE DECK*
Stats for the Alfonso XIII class of battleships:
Displacement: 88,000 tons
Main armament: 18” triple gun turrets x5
Secondary armaments: 7” triple gun turrets x6, 5” double gun turrets and 3” double gun turrets x8
Belt armor thickness: 17”
Top speed: 25 knots
Ratings for the Alfonso XIII class of battleships:
Main firepower: Excellent
Main gun accuracy: Excellent
Secondary firepower: Very good
Secondary gun accuracy: Poor
Armor: Good
Speed: Slow
Manuverabilty: Fair
Damage control: Very good
In conclusion: The Alfonso XIII class of battleships is a very formidable enemy, one that few captains, brave or stupid, would dare to engage. With its withering firepower and accuracy at ranges once unheard of, there are few ways of countering this menace of the seas. One way is by use of naval air supremacy from aircraft launched by aircraft carriers and constantly bombarding it with bombers. Another, more suicidal way is by use of destroyers and torpedoes. This, however may subject the destroyers to both main and secondary battery fire, leading to almost certain destruction. In short, this ship is most effectively countered by aircraft bombardment; however, should one’s fleet encounter this monstrosity of a battleship without an aircraft carrier, it would almost certainly mean a highly decisive victory for the Alfonso XIII class, with the complete and utter destruction of said fleet.
I would mounted some trops behind the tower just to distrect the formation of the enemy.
You Hooded that cruiser
Best channel ever
This is basically the navy side of the halo
This game looks awesome
Hood moment on that cruiser
edit: those cruisers*
Ships looks like a toys:D
I hope they make a game with AC carriers, the anti aircraft would look amazing
gotta love a Spanish 5-turret Yamato
Ammo detonation damage: ITS OVER 900000000000000000
At 34:10 Imagine being a Crewmember of that ship, I probably would be pissing myself.
Accurate representation of the new US Railgun