meanwhile, Carlsen is 2.5 minutes late for a 3 minute blitz game against Kovalev and still wins. (he did not do it on purpose, he was late due to traffic, although if he really wanted to be on time, he would have departed sooner, so while not intentional, it's still his fault) and yeah, he was more than 2.5 minutes late, Kovalev just waited for him for a while and even after that when the officials told him, he started the clock... so basically Carlsen was something like 5 minutes late for a 3 minute blitz and still won
Coming late to a game on purpose as a habit/psychological tool is quite obnoxious indeed. Maybe if everyone treated it the way vishy did, Karpov would've got the memo and knocked it off. Or maybe the zero tolerance thing would've been introduced faster lol. Thanks for that BTW, anatoly hahaha
I worked with someone once who refused to work when his colleague left for a smoke, he would sit with his arms folded instead. Not quite the same though.
Lol well technically he is being just as productive as the smokers. If they take a break every hour or so, it'd be unfair if he couldn't take one as well
@@anamorfoplasis What if someone was hypothetically named a series of indecipherable alien characters completely mysterious to a native born English speaker that was shitposting online late at night
Nowadays there are strict rules on lower rated tournaments how many minutes player can be late and still play, usually only for few minutes is allowed, but not 10 or more like it used to be in old times.Zero tolerance is for very high level tournaments usually . I played on FIDE rated rapid tournament with proffesional GM-s and IM-s and lot of amateurs and there was allowed 5 minutes to be late.
First of all nobody is bigger than the game and your karpov was up against a 5x world Champion Vishy.. So he ain't no boss and should respect the officials and the opponent
dude don't even compare them, they are on different levels, you have a very limited knowledge of the game if you suppose that Anand is somehow ahead of Karpov overall
You don't my knowledge in chess okey. I also consider Karpov as legend,still much ahead than kasporiv . But anand is the mist versatile won championship in all formats . But in classical ,blitz anand is much ahead of Karpov in all the parameters .okey .Karpov luckily won the world championship against him because the authorities were favour of him. But he was truely a legend. What I told is Anand statistics against Karpov much ahead . I consider Tal as greatest of greatest ever ....perhaps equal to Fischer or greater than Fischer,and kramnik creative genius.....pls don't try to evaluate the knowledge . Perhaps you are scholar or I am a fool
@@padip3421 Well, here, you are bringing the match between Anand and 47 years old Karpov as a proof of what? Did I say that it proofed Karpov was better? What stats are you talking about? Anand has never been a really dominant player (in classical chess at least) - look how many tourneys he won being officially a World champion. And Karpov was the best and the most dominant player for 10 years at least (75-85) and then N°2 for 10 years more (he won tons of rapid and blitz competitions too). And being 50+ y.o. he reached the final of the super rapid chess tournament in 2002 which is mind blowing. And you called his stats "bushy" and said he was "far behind VIshy in all formats" - maybe it is not a limited knowledge but something else, I do not know, but it says smth about you for sure.
Sir, it has been mis spelt istead of Vishy it has wrongly spelt bushy. I respect Karpov more than Kasparov defnitley . In Linares chess his unbeaten 11 out of 13 games still a reccord .He was outstanding in his own periond sane Anand . 53 year old Anand defeated kramnik in non castling chess and with Carlson 25 years senior to hinin WCC his double blunders one sure winning chance and other sure draw he thrown away. Kramnik creator of Berlin defence succumbed to the great talents of Anand .. See how many times he missed WCC. He was the only champion won WCC in all formats . But Karpov can face only challenger . Just see the difference . A champion has to face all contenters to face the challenge? Karpov never faced that . In that extend 5 time winner who faced all formats Anand - Tal was the greatest player in the 159 years of world champiionship. Karpov was a legend but Anand was superb .When Karpov and and same age he will outclass Karpov simply but he couldnt to Tal.
@@ajaysabarish9645 How do you know for sure? Karpov didn't care about psychological part of the game. He is the greatest positional player the world has ever seen and the man thought about nothing but Chess and how to suffocate his opponents on the board. Not off it
@@trentarnold2670 actually, Karpov had mentioned in (more than) a couple of interviews in the 1990s that Vishy was slightly weaker in the psychological side of chess. Whether true or not is another debate. But I'm not going to say Karpov is right or wrong for doing that. These little side-games have been a part of chess at the WCC level for a very long time.
Karpov scammed his way into 1998 fide world title win just by beating a tired vishy who won a big knockout tournament for the chance to fight karpov and immediately he had to travel to play karpov and he lost on tiebreaks .karpov was 46 and anand was miles better then.Garry Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik, had refused to participate in the tournament over the privileges being extended to Karpov.he had qualified for the finals by winning a knock-out tournament in Groningen but had to immediately travel to Lausanne to play for the title without a break or time for preparation.. It is like winning the candidates immediately going to play the fresh world fide champion. Kasparov said the same and supported anand on the unfairness
How did Karpov orchestrate those tournament schedules? Did he pay FIDE lots of money a year in advance? Sounds doubtful that he'd take such risks, even if it was possible.
@@JJJMMM1 Read Vishy Anand's book- Mindmaster(that is if you can read). You will get to know how and why that was just politics running the chess at the time
Full Video Link - ua-cam.com/video/S1sKmw2evjU/v-deo.html
"Well not me , Excuse me "- Legend 2021 .
1:11 Anand: Karpov sat down
at the same time Ian sat down
Amazing observation
so ian is karpov..no wonder he is so good
I genuinely thought it was a rerun video of Karpov, the timing was so fine
This made me respect Vishy a little more than I already did.
Anand is a living legend who is being active across generations, we should hear more of his stories, the guy has so much experience
Vishy's humour is very dry would have been a perfect test match commentator
Classical chess is like a test match . Speed chess is like t20
A lot of similarities. Both can last for a ridiculous amount of Time and an quite drawish.
@@sephorapiano9602 tbf draw rate in test has come down a lot
Don't try to push cricket everywhere. Chess is played by more countries than cricket.
@@sephorapiano9602 Well, test matches have less than 30% draw rate lol. These have 99.99% draw rate.
Karpov : "Did that even happen"
karpov giving bribe to vishy bts to forget everything lol
@@riynu7774 Lmao 🤣
Great story by vishy. Nice response
meanwhile, Carlsen is 2.5 minutes late for a 3 minute blitz game against Kovalev and still wins.
(he did not do it on purpose, he was late due to traffic, although if he really wanted to be on time, he would have departed sooner, so while not intentional, it's still his fault)
and yeah, he was more than 2.5 minutes late, Kovalev just waited for him for a while and even after that when the officials told him, he started the clock...
so basically Carlsen was something like 5 minutes late for a 3 minute blitz and still won
vishy is a good and interesting commentator
Coming late to a game on purpose as a habit/psychological tool is quite obnoxious indeed. Maybe if everyone treated it the way vishy did, Karpov would've got the memo and knocked it off. Or maybe the zero tolerance thing would've been introduced faster lol. Thanks for that BTW, anatoly hahaha
I worked with someone once who refused to work when his colleague left for a smoke, he would sit with his arms folded instead. Not quite the same though.
Lol well technically he is being just as productive as the smokers. If they take a break every hour or so, it'd be unfair if he couldn't take one as well
Sounds like the plot for Bartleby: Origins.
@@mridulsharma7994 Ha ha yeah it does, not sure what happened to him, was a while ago now. Take care.
What if someone was named Viswanathan Nepomniachtchi
8 syllables at all, 2 consonants in a row at most. Easy.
Btw “chtch” is one sound. Like long English “sh”.
@@anamorfoplasis What is someone was named Moist von ludwig
@@randomguy9084 So?
@@anamorfoplasis What if someone was hypothetically named a series of indecipherable alien characters completely mysterious to a native born English speaker that was shitposting online late at night
@@randomguy9084 Was that a Tesla reference
Cool story hansal
funny as hell.
Guys where do I watch vishy's live commentary?
I don't think it matters cause you play your move and lets clock ticking
Nowadays there are strict rules on lower rated tournaments how many minutes player can be late and still play, usually only for few minutes is allowed, but not 10 or more like it used to be in old times.Zero tolerance is for very high level tournaments usually . I played on FIDE rated rapid tournament with proffesional GM-s and IM-s and lot of amateurs and there was allowed 5 minutes to be late.
So did Vishy win that game?
😂
probably a draw
Gelfand is still active!!!
Karpov can be late because he is the boss of chess
In that case he need not even turn up for the match.
First of all nobody is bigger than the game and your karpov was up against a 5x world Champion Vishy.. So he ain't no boss and should respect the officials and the opponent
@@universe6735 rsrsrsrs
@@shlokgaur4030 he was referring to a meme 😒 chill
Punctuality is the same whether you're the boss or a servant
Bushy Karpov statitics...Karpov lagged far behind vishi in all formats...
dude don't even compare them, they are on different levels, you have a very limited knowledge of the game if you suppose that Anand is somehow ahead of Karpov overall
You don't my knowledge in chess okey. I also consider Karpov as legend,still much ahead than kasporiv . But anand is the mist versatile won championship in all formats . But in classical ,blitz anand is much ahead of Karpov in all the parameters .okey .Karpov luckily won the world championship against him because the authorities were favour of him. But he was truely a legend. What I told is Anand statistics against Karpov much ahead . I consider Tal as greatest of greatest ever ....perhaps equal to Fischer or greater than Fischer,and kramnik creative genius.....pls don't try to evaluate the knowledge . Perhaps you are scholar or I am a fool
@@padip3421 Well, here, you are bringing the match between Anand and 47 years old Karpov as a proof of what? Did I say that it proofed Karpov was better? What stats are you talking about? Anand has never been a really dominant player (in classical chess at least) - look how many tourneys he won being officially a World champion. And Karpov was the best and the most dominant player for 10 years at least (75-85) and then N°2 for 10 years more (he won tons of rapid and blitz competitions too). And being 50+ y.o. he reached the final of the super rapid chess tournament in 2002 which is mind blowing. And you called his stats "bushy" and said he was "far behind VIshy in all formats" - maybe it is not a limited knowledge but something else, I do not know, but it says smth about you for sure.
Sir, it has been mis spelt istead of Vishy it has wrongly spelt bushy. I respect Karpov more than Kasparov defnitley . In Linares chess his unbeaten 11 out of 13 games still a reccord .He was outstanding in his own periond sane Anand . 53 year old Anand defeated kramnik in non castling chess and with Carlson 25 years senior to hinin WCC his double blunders one sure winning chance and other sure draw he thrown away. Kramnik creator of Berlin defence succumbed to the great talents of Anand .. See how many times he missed WCC. He was the only champion won WCC in all formats . But Karpov can face only challenger . Just see the difference . A champion has to face all contenters to face the challenge? Karpov never faced that . In that extend 5 time winner who faced all formats Anand - Tal was the greatest player in the 159 years of world champiionship. Karpov was a legend but Anand was superb .When Karpov and and same age he will outclass Karpov simply but he couldnt to Tal.
@@kolovikon2118 There are idiots everywhere don't pay attention to them
So he got tilted by something that simple. Your opponent isn't obliged to come "on time". It's his time, he can use it however he chooses.
I hope its sarcastic! Isn’t it
the innaugral move wasn't made, the clock didn't start, karpov did it to pyschologically attack Anand
@@ajaysabarish9645 How do you know for sure? Karpov didn't care about psychological part of the game. He is the greatest positional player the world has ever seen and the man thought about nothing but Chess and how to suffocate his opponents on the board. Not off it
@@trentarnold2670 actually, Karpov had mentioned in (more than) a couple of interviews in the 1990s that Vishy was slightly weaker in the psychological side of chess. Whether true or not is another debate. But I'm not going to say Karpov is right or wrong for doing that. These little side-games have been a part of chess at the WCC level for a very long time.
Not everything someone does is "tilting"
karpov late cause he need to wash his hair. his hair always oily its disgusting
Jeex
Hahahahaha
Karpov scammed his way into 1998 fide world title win just by beating a tired vishy who won a big knockout tournament for the chance to fight karpov and immediately he had to travel to play karpov and he lost on tiebreaks .karpov was 46 and anand was miles better then.Garry Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik, had refused to participate in the tournament over the privileges being extended to Karpov.he had qualified for the finals by winning a knock-out tournament in Groningen but had to immediately travel to Lausanne to play for the title without a break or time for preparation.. It is like winning the candidates immediately going to play the fresh world fide champion. Kasparov said the same and supported anand on the unfairness
Tell me you are Indian without telling me you are Indian:
And how is any of that Karpov's fault, let alone his scam?
@@JJJMMM1 Misterious Indian ways.
How did Karpov orchestrate those tournament schedules? Did he pay FIDE lots of money a year in advance?
Sounds doubtful that he'd take such risks, even if it was possible.
@@JJJMMM1 Read Vishy Anand's book- Mindmaster(that is if you can read). You will get to know how and why that was just politics running the chess at the time