Downstate federal judge rules Illinois assault weapons ban unconstitutional

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 302

  • @the2ndcoming380
    @the2ndcoming380 2 місяці тому +277

    Chicago doesn't get to determine how we live our lives down state.

    • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
      @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 2 місяці тому

      Rifles are very, very rarely used in crime. These people want to disarm Americans.

    • @That-Will-Do-It
      @That-Will-Do-It 2 місяці тому +18

      Yessir. Election results show that 600K people in Cook County made the difference in turning it blue. Chicago is purple now. Aside from a couple of the surrounding counties, the rest of state is as red as Texas.

    • @sp4859
      @sp4859 2 місяці тому +2

      @@That-Will-Do-It Totally agree

    • @TheSpartanVault
      @TheSpartanVault 2 місяці тому +2

      💯‼️

    • @JohnWalsh2019
      @JohnWalsh2019 2 місяці тому

      ​@@That-Will-Do-Ityes sir facts!

  • @TrueAmerican-my5nd
    @TrueAmerican-my5nd 2 місяці тому +103

    Just because some little girl is scared, doesn’t mean I should have my constitutional rights trampled over. My rights don’t end where your feeling begin!

    • @LeavingReviews
      @LeavingReviews 2 місяці тому +9

      Maybe she should get training and learn how to use a gun for protection if she is so scared.

    • @donwyoming1936
      @donwyoming1936 2 місяці тому

      If you were a student of history, you'd know the 2A was adopted so local governments can raise militias to keep rioting peasants in check. It was never meant to give us unfettered access to firearms. Quite the opposite

    • @Grabthattass
      @Grabthattass 2 місяці тому

      @@LeavingReviews children shouldn’t need gun training they should be safe from guns

    • @Sarcasmarkus
      @Sarcasmarkus 2 місяці тому +2

      ​@@Grabthattassif the average law abiding citizen were allowed to practice their rights unincumbered then the criminals and crazies wouldn't have much of a chance to mess around, fafo would prevail.

    • @NorthernNorthdude91749
      @NorthernNorthdude91749 2 місяці тому

      @@Grabthattass You're never safe, so you should be armed.

  • @shawndonovan216
    @shawndonovan216 2 місяці тому +80

    time to vote JB out of office

  • @stevenphillips3466
    @stevenphillips3466 2 місяці тому +95

    Where are the laws by Illinois to get illegal guns from the gangsters instead of harassing law abiding citizens

    • @jonlloyd3020
      @jonlloyd3020 2 місяці тому +1

      Because gangsters don’t unalive children in schools.

    • @irreverentgentleman3745
      @irreverentgentleman3745 2 місяці тому +14

      @@jonlloyd3020. Just outside as collateral damage in the streets..

    • @Silent_Ears
      @Silent_Ears 2 місяці тому +4

      @@jonlloyd3020 wow, UA-cam wont allow my post to you about who does the most shootings.

    • @knine8154
      @knine8154 2 місяці тому

      ​@jonlloyd3020 Don't know who constantly votes to stop protecting schools do you?

    • @knine8154
      @knine8154 2 місяці тому +4

      ​@@Silent_EarsThey have tripled down on the censorship

  • @mandibarcena6667
    @mandibarcena6667 2 місяці тому +51

    1:47 That is a joke right? How in hell did the ban have any affect in Chicago gang shootings? It did not!!!

    • @JohnWalsh2019
      @JohnWalsh2019 2 місяці тому +3

      ZERO. It only hurts people that want to enjoy our God given rights.

  • @jacksmith2983
    @jacksmith2983 2 місяці тому +51

    The gun law doesn't stop criminals. Only infringement on law binding citizens.

  • @PowderedToastMan661
    @PowderedToastMan661 2 місяці тому +112

    I’d like to ask the young woman how this law will keep criminals from committing crimes with guns. It only affects law abiding gun owners. It turns law abiding, responsible gun owners into criminals for simply exercising their constitutional right.

    • @muratbura19
      @muratbura19 2 місяці тому +1

      @@PowderedToastMan661 do you need an automatic to shoot a deer?

    • @jg0107
      @jg0107 2 місяці тому +14

      @@muratbura19 Do you need a computer or smartphone to express your opinion?

    • @UrbanGardeningWithD.A.Hanks14
      @UrbanGardeningWithD.A.Hanks14 2 місяці тому

      It won't. Any more than creating laws against cars to stop criminals like Ted Kennedy from killing people with sedans. These people simply don't know what they are talking about.

    • @PowderedToastMan661
      @PowderedToastMan661 2 місяці тому +6

      @@muratbura19 To own an automatic weapon in the United States you have to obtain a federal firearms license. I don’t have one of those so I’m only legally allowed to own semi automatic guns, revolvers, and black powder guns.

    • @PowderedToastMan661
      @PowderedToastMan661 2 місяці тому +8

      @@muratbura19 Besides all that there’s nothing in the second amendment that says anything about what arms I’m allowed to bear, or what guns are needed when hunting.

  • @icharus
    @icharus 2 місяці тому +126

    Victims of gun violence don’t get to decide which Constitutional rights I get. The ban is a slap to my face as a responsible and law abiding gun owner.

    • @donald2665
      @donald2665 2 місяці тому +20

      There is no such thing however as "Gun Violence". No Firearm fires its self, unless there is a defect in design. There is only "Human Violence". The Label "Gun Violence" was a Master Class in propaganda when crafted by the anti-Firearm anti-Bill of Rights Fanatics. There also only "Victims of Human Violence" . Respectfully however I do agree with much of what you stated, as a gun owner.

    • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
      @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 2 місяці тому

      The Left loves to pander to dumb dumbs. That's the bulk of their voter base.

    • @carbonfiber8071
      @carbonfiber8071 2 місяці тому +4

      @@donald2665 Sig Saur enters the chat...

    • @donald2665
      @donald2665 2 місяці тому +2

      @@carbonfiber8071 Respectfully, I did briefly think of that when I made my comment, and have since modified it to reflect what you mentioned. Much of the on-line comments I have made or responded to have been the results of on line comments and conversations on line with a wide range of US Marxists (Both young Men and Women), Bolshevik Socialists, one ANTIFA Member from 5 years in the past going forward, and all were Americans and all were with owners of AR-15 Rifles and similar. The 33 year of age ANTIFA Member five years ago was from either WI or MN, and had even been former Army - and he was self admitted ANTIFA: His quote to me was "We on the Left Love our Guns, and we have MANY!" I've received many interesting comments from the rest and gathered that all of them would NEVER register or surrender so much as a Rusty Butter Knife to ANY Governor, President, or combination there of. To The Republic, and The Bill of Rights, which We The People just made a Statement in Support of with our Vote for Trump. .

  • @alexandersheppard1997
    @alexandersheppard1997 2 місяці тому +91

    SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

    • @thelogicaldanger
      @thelogicaldanger 2 місяці тому

      Unless you are Hunter Biden....I don't see any of you supposed "gun right" advocates standing up for his right to own guns.

    • @brandond6724
      @brandond6724 2 місяці тому +4

      MEANS SHALL NOT!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @gunsandsilver
      @gunsandsilver 2 місяці тому +1

      Say it louder the people in the back.

  • @PINEYWOODSREBEL
    @PINEYWOODSREBEL 2 місяці тому +45

    In common use for lawful purposes, can't be banned per Bruen. Just a matter of time, especially since Trump prevailed.

    • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
      @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 2 місяці тому +10

      TBH, I don't even care what the SCOTUS says. Not one tiny bit. I don't need those people translating the Constitution for me. I can read. There shouldn't even be any discussion on the Bill of Rights.

    • @Charlie8-io9mq
      @Charlie8-io9mq 2 місяці тому +1

      Weird how much alike abortion & higher gun controls are alike

  • @MX109MX
    @MX109MX 2 місяці тому +29

    “…shall not be infringed.”

  • @Nontactical1014
    @Nontactical1014 2 місяці тому +9

    That lady this is a slap in the face of every gun violence victim no it getting passed was a slap in the face of every person in that state who's rights where stolen from them

    • @topangasmith2030
      @topangasmith2030 2 місяці тому +2

      @@Nontactical1014 yea people being able to protect themselves with firearms is so bad right?

  • @matthewlee9728
    @matthewlee9728 2 місяці тому +16

    id like tyo point out that kentucky has a very low violent crime rate and almost no state gun laws vermont one of the 3 safest states has had permitless carry since 1792 adn its been permitless open carry in ky since the 1800s and recently became permitless cocnealed carry

  • @waters18
    @waters18 2 місяці тому +55

    Pritzker rules dont over ride the constitution. Pritzker should think about his health instead of overturning this law 🤣 🤡

    • @KerryLondon-gp1rz
      @KerryLondon-gp1rz 2 місяці тому

      Israel and USA Owned by the Church 🇮🇱🖤🇺🇸

    • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
      @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 2 місяці тому

      Deport him back were he came from!

    • @tr4l1975
      @tr4l1975 2 місяці тому

      Looks like he was assaulted by to many large capacity buffets, with assault forks and spoons.

    • @gnosticnight
      @gnosticnight 2 місяці тому

      He is morbidly obese and should spend his time working with trainers and dietitians rather than concocting new ways of disarming law-abiding citizens in the name of "public safety."

    • @georgerucker9263
      @georgerucker9263 2 місяці тому +4

      Cant think about health sitting in a donut shop

  • @cvillefarmer
    @cvillefarmer 2 місяці тому +14

    "pain and trauma doesnt over ride my rights"

  • @tubekxb
    @tubekxb 2 місяці тому +7

    Most shootings in IL are with handguns, not rifles.

  • @carbonfiber8071
    @carbonfiber8071 2 місяці тому +17

    Because it is unconstitutional.

  • @montecraig7032
    @montecraig7032 2 місяці тому +6

    Reducing gun violence is not a legal argument to keep the ban. The second amendment is about the citizens being armed with weapons that are useful in warfare.

  • @NosebergEatzbugsVonShekelstein
    @NosebergEatzbugsVonShekelstein 2 місяці тому +53

    Yeah because some roly poly teenage girl is somehow an expert on constitutional law..

  • @iwishpeoplecaredagain
    @iwishpeoplecaredagain 2 місяці тому +18

    No infringement on my 2nd amendment

    • @thelogicaldanger
      @thelogicaldanger 2 місяці тому

      Unless you are Hunter Biden....I don't see any of you supposed "gun right" advocates standing up for his right to own guns.

  • @WilcoxNotreallythere
    @WilcoxNotreallythere 2 місяці тому +7

    Our government is oit of control and unamerucan.

  • @stevenphillips3466
    @stevenphillips3466 2 місяці тому +17

    SO what is an assault weapon ?

    • @aliclarke3105
      @aliclarke3105 2 місяці тому +4

      @@stevenphillips3466 all weapons....thats why they were made......

    • @carbonfiber8071
      @carbonfiber8071 2 місяці тому +5

      @@aliclarke3105 They are used to defend people every day...

    • @carbonfiber8071
      @carbonfiber8071 2 місяці тому +3

      @@aliclarke3105 Way more for defense according to the CDC's own numbers.

    • @lylemcdermott2566
      @lylemcdermott2566 2 місяці тому +2

      @@stevenphillips3466 the ones that go boom boom. Guns are scary.

    • @georgerucker9263
      @georgerucker9263 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@lylemcdermott2566yea scary to nutless wonders

  • @torinwulfren9463
    @torinwulfren9463 2 місяці тому +19

    Using the term “Assault Rifle” doesn’t further influence the public to support your ideals of banning ArmaLite Rifles (not “Assault Rifles”) for sport, hunting and/or security. Not your choice what other people can do with what they own, regardless how much you like/dislike it.
    The term “Assault Rifle” originated from Adolf Hitler for the Sturmgewehr 44 machine gun so if people wanna unconsciously alter the term for their benefit, have fun.

  • @carbonfiber8071
    @carbonfiber8071 2 місяці тому +11

    Someone explain to that girl that people use guns to defend themselves and their families EVERY DAY.

    • @JohnWalsh2019
      @JohnWalsh2019 2 місяці тому

      Du m b a s s e z can't understand truth and logic.

    • @kdsuibhne
      @kdsuibhne Місяць тому +1

      @@carbonfiber8071 guns in the hands of civilians are more often used to save lives than to commit unlawful homicide.

  • @DonaldWheelis-xb1lu
    @DonaldWheelis-xb1lu 2 місяці тому +12

    I have had it with the million different versions of the 2A. It has to be one version to be held for all states. Anything different from the way it is written is a violation of my god given rights.

  • @Saint7474
    @Saint7474 2 місяці тому +3

    The ban doesn’t help anyone who is following the law the criminals are not following those same laws why should we suffer

  • @scott2228
    @scott2228 2 місяці тому +3

    So sad that Illinois has to live under Chicago’s thumb.

  • @donald2665
    @donald2665 2 місяці тому +2

    Recommend careful planning and implementation of "Dispersal of Assets" to keep one's firearms and all accessories and ammo in numerous secure, remote and undisclosed locations to keep them all safe well into the coming years.

  • @georgerucker9263
    @georgerucker9263 2 місяці тому +3

    We dont care about your feelings. Your feelings dont stop my rights

  •  2 місяці тому +1

    So is there a time limit for when we can start purchasing lower receivers on the internet again?

  • @teglaprbambaluftlaurvafhen5449
    @teglaprbambaluftlaurvafhen5449 2 місяці тому +9

    A man. How is it that the weapon is blamed? Is it cheaper to prosecute the firearm.?.......space cadets

  • @echo_94
    @echo_94 2 місяці тому +2

    Feelings do not overstep our constitution remember that

  • @garycampbell5297
    @garycampbell5297 2 місяці тому +8

    Outstanding news

  • @adrianwilson7193
    @adrianwilson7193 2 місяці тому +3

    Supreme ruling? Our rights come from GOD. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

  • @dubdollatv3474
    @dubdollatv3474 2 місяці тому +4

    It’s to many guns in Chicago and To many kids got em already don’t even matter at this point

    • @monke6776
      @monke6776 2 місяці тому +1

      @@dubdollatv3474
      It’s too, not to. Too is used to mean “in addition to” and to refer to amount. If I have too much of something, I’d use too. To, on the other hand, refers to a thing or a verb. I would go to the store, to buy apples.
      Here’s a sentence which incorporates all three.
      I went to the store, and bought two too many apples. Notice the difference?

    • @stevenphillips3466
      @stevenphillips3466 2 місяці тому +5

      B lack kids ...the media wont dare say that

    • @monke6776
      @monke6776 2 місяці тому +1

      Furthermore, if you were to say what you said, but properly, here’s how it would sound.
      “There are too many guns in Chicago, and too many kids have them already. It doesn’t even matter at this point.”
      Read this compared to yours and ask yourself how you would rather sound.

    • @JohnWalsh2019
      @JohnWalsh2019 2 місяці тому

      ​@@monke6776neat story bro so how about gun rights?

    • @monke6776
      @monke6776 2 місяці тому

      @@JohnWalsh2019
      Poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop

  • @mr.wiggles1909
    @mr.wiggles1909 2 місяці тому +1

    Imagine if people were as outraged about constitutional rights being taken away as much as abortion.

  • @barbless_hook78
    @barbless_hook78 2 місяці тому +2

    We all know its unconstitutional. No need for a judge until its time to prosecute the drafters and signers of these bills. Carry on.

  • @djreggieduffleduffle3488
    @djreggieduffleduffle3488 2 місяці тому +1

    Unconstitutional thank you judge never said a better word

  • @eddielee5238
    @eddielee5238 2 місяці тому +1

    Just another reason to have a Northern Illinois and a Southern Illinois ...

  • @JasonIsaac-wh9km
    @JasonIsaac-wh9km 2 місяці тому +1

    A win for the Constitution. Stop infringing on rights in our Constitution.

  • @prgmr5057
    @prgmr5057 2 місяці тому +1

    When seconds count, the police are just minutes away.

  • @davidcalderon9051
    @davidcalderon9051 2 місяці тому +1

    Powerful move by the judge.

  • @glitch_skunkogen
    @glitch_skunkogen 2 місяці тому +3

    heres what they arnt telling you they have a 30 day hold on the stay assault style weapons is a buzzword assault rifle is a select fire rifle the ar15 is simi only and the ar15 isnt high powered grandpas 30 06 hunting rifle is though

  • @Barbrady007
    @Barbrady007 2 місяці тому

    My senior year we had someone bring a gun to our school and this is not a slap in our face as the lady tries to say. We want our gun rights back.

  • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
    @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 2 місяці тому +13

    That Billionaire foreign Governor has to go!

  • @donald2665
    @donald2665 2 місяці тому +4

    There is something I have to say to all the anti-firearm Citizens, but which is sometimes mentioned by others - and that is these Laws and Edicts are directed at Law Abiding Citizens ONLY. Criminals have no respect and no fear and absolutely no obedience in obtaining the firearms you seek to ban. A Lot of weapons are coming across the Southern Border of Mexico, where weapons are smuggled into Mexico from Eastern Europe, South America, and Asia, along with fentanyl, and Glock Switches from factories in China. The Petty Dictator Governor of Illinois is another divisive anti-Bill of Rights and anti-2nd Amendment Fanatic.

  • @PhukYewtoob
    @PhukYewtoob 2 місяці тому +1

    Finally got our rights back!

  • @SparkShiftYT
    @SparkShiftYT 2 місяці тому

    Rights vs Emotions.
    Rights should win every time.

  • @simplytrolling6869
    @simplytrolling6869 15 днів тому

    Sorry yall, I’m late to the party but just wanted to say… I have never imagined nor thought of a firearm assaulting anyone to be possible.

  • @GonnaRunAmuck
    @GonnaRunAmuck 2 місяці тому

    Dont leave your house if you are too scared to go anywhere you dont feel safe.

  • @theghost065
    @theghost065 2 місяці тому +1

    They should've left it how it was

  • @youknow9092
    @youknow9092 2 місяці тому

    Being a victim of a crime, is not justification to violate the constitution or our civil rights as Americans.

  • @MrTee-de7to
    @MrTee-de7to Місяць тому

    The Second Amendment is about self defense not hunting.

  • @Islamic-palestine186
    @Islamic-palestine186 2 місяці тому +2

    Finally 🙏

  • @STANDIEMCSTILLE
    @STANDIEMCSTILLE Місяць тому

    Law abiding citizens are the only ones hurt by these ridiculous laws. Criminals are unaffected. Your feeling do not dictate my life and freedoms.

  • @whattheshep6814
    @whattheshep6814 2 місяці тому +1

    Shall not be infringed

  • @ambla23
    @ambla23 2 місяці тому

    Shall NOT be infringed!

  • @rneal63
    @rneal63 2 місяці тому +6

    For every day this unconstitutional law has been in place, JB should be fined $10 million dollars per day from his personal money.

  • @adrianrivera1962
    @adrianrivera1962 Місяць тому

    Something is wrong with that girl.
    Youre not the only one who has gone through that trauma and some cant afford to move to a HOA neighborhood amd we have to protect ourselves.
    She is so close minded to her own scenario

  • @jaredf4453
    @jaredf4453 2 місяці тому +6

    Good it's completely unconstitutional

  • @andrewvonvogt2856
    @andrewvonvogt2856 2 місяці тому +1

    This is nutty there is no such thing as a assault weapon assault is a physical attack think about that wish these stupid idiots would look up the word in the dictionary

  • @4catsnow
    @4catsnow 2 місяці тому

    Politicians out there that can't process the fact that legal gun owners aren't wired to atone for the sins of others misbehaving with guns.. And every now and then, along comes a judge adamant about recognizing the Constitution...

  • @johnwestervelt7454
    @johnwestervelt7454 2 місяці тому

    All laws against firearms ,attachments are illegal. The constitution limits the Governments,not the people

  • @RalphyRalphHookem
    @RalphyRalphHookem 2 місяці тому +10

    MAGA

  • @neatdolphin5351
    @neatdolphin5351 2 місяці тому +1

    I hope it lasts cause I am buying one the second its possible and keeping it. Come and take it feds.

  • @Maxx7teen
    @Maxx7teen 2 місяці тому +13

    LETSS GOO when Trump is back everything goes back right thank you 🙏ofn grave

    • @MrBigspendn
      @MrBigspendn 2 місяці тому +1

      It also takes us citizens.

  • @toddparsons2980
    @toddparsons2980 2 місяці тому

    I believe Illinois is still a state of the U.S.A. and is provided all the protections under the Bill Of Rights.

  • @Erichhh
    @Erichhh 2 місяці тому

    It's not a second amendment right, it is an inalienable right. The second amendment is just a reminder of that to would-be government tyrants. And even with that reminder, Pritzker still didn't understand it.

  • @yonisalinas8714
    @yonisalinas8714 2 місяці тому

    Smh this law is ridiculous, how are criminals going to have better weapons than us citizens trying to protect our families, the criminals get assault rifles from other states regardless, nothing has changed since his law was approved.

  • @Lokenhp
    @Lokenhp 2 місяці тому

    Freedom!

  • @-3as504
    @-3as504 2 місяці тому

    Assault?
    Assault stick?
    Assault table lamp?
    Assault broom?
    Assault book?
    Assault backpack?
    Assault pencil?
    Assault car?
    The list goes on and on.
    Get a grip CBS.

  • @michaelrizzo4946
    @michaelrizzo4946 2 місяці тому

    Freedom is scary, deal with it!

  • @kennethmeeker6369
    @kennethmeeker6369 2 місяці тому +1

    They’ve already appealed this decision lol 😂
    It’s a done deal tho but some simple wording and they’ll reinstate another gun ban under a different title it’s never ending.

  • @MichaelDespairs
    @MichaelDespairs 2 місяці тому

    Stop calling them assault weapons! These are home defense weapons assault weapons are fully automatic. These are only semi-auto.

  • @sungkim742
    @sungkim742 2 місяці тому

    Democrats should start with passing a law that only Democrats are banned from buying "assault" rifles or guns in general. See how that works out.

  • @daltonknazavich7136
    @daltonknazavich7136 2 місяці тому

    There is not such thing as an assault rifle

  • @IchigoTheQuincy
    @IchigoTheQuincy 2 місяці тому

    So the big defender for the ban is a child… this is who they’re sending to fight this?

  • @pigpaul
    @pigpaul Місяць тому

    SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!
    🇺🇸🫡

  • @Shane_Diesel_2010
    @Shane_Diesel_2010 2 місяці тому

    What’s an assault weapon 🤔

  • @wwj14
    @wwj14 2 місяці тому

    before Lexington and Concord: note: you may only carry a half powder horn of powder and ONLY three muske t balls! its the law!!!

  • @DarkAgony
    @DarkAgony 2 місяці тому

    Pritzker sucks! Give us our rights back!

  • @exposeevil5492
    @exposeevil5492 Місяць тому

    😂 what can they appeal? They don't understand historical tradition of 1791? Acting in open rebellion against the constitution

  • @MrGringoman80
    @MrGringoman80 Місяць тому

    Of course its unconstitutional. Everyone knows that just a lot of people are not honest.

  • @joe352001
    @joe352001 2 місяці тому

    OK so don't blame the person but blame the gun.

  • @bradlybaldwin2609
    @bradlybaldwin2609 2 місяці тому

    Yay!!!!!! Don’t ban them! Semi autos are great fun. lol but that’s it!

  • @DanielKellyful
    @DanielKellyful 2 місяці тому

    This is not disrespectful for overturning it, it's unconstitutional that they banned the weapons in the first place, the 2nd amendment give all Americans the right to own guns, now should maybe a more through background check and other certain measures be put into place to reduce the chances of guns being placed into the wrong hands sure but banning them I say again is unconstitutional.

  • @marioallen6380
    @marioallen6380 2 місяці тому

    Never have principalities defeated Yahweh!!!

  • @jakeola10
    @jakeola10 Місяць тому

    California and Washington next

  • @adrianwilson7193
    @adrianwilson7193 2 місяці тому

    Our Natural Rights come from GOD.
    not man. Self - defense is a NATURAL RIGHT. " SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED".

  • @Dimka43
    @Dimka43 2 місяці тому

    The girl says" we all know how much pain destruction and chaos these assault weapons can bring". I don't know if she's aware of the pain chaos and destruction that a 8-inch kitchen knife can bring..! Somebody can go into a crowd stop 100 people before anyone even notice who is doing it because it's silent and deadly! But AR Style* (I'm sure no one on the left even knows what that means) a rifle make someone shot in the crowd it's so wild with that everyone is aware of what's going on plus it's big you can't hide it like you can hide a knife... So after one shot somebody can either tackle him down someone with a concealed carry can take him down (if you are in the red state) (if you're in the blue state and then everyone will scatter and scream making it easier for the law breaking criminal).. so yes if you're going to argue guns make sure you know more about it turn the guy defending it otherwise you just sounds stupid. 🍻 Love and unity all the way! 😉

  • @juanhernandez2781
    @juanhernandez2781 2 місяці тому

    Oh shut up with your feelings

  • @keuntalatham
    @keuntalatham 2 місяці тому

    JB Pritzker Gotta go

  • @maddog45auto66
    @maddog45auto66 2 місяці тому

    J b pritzker better be ready for donald j trump broke hill straight and pritzker up

  • @angeloplanes8497
    @angeloplanes8497 2 місяці тому

    😂 gun grabbers are trying to cope with constitutionally protected rights.

  • @thomastherriault8632
    @thomastherriault8632 2 місяці тому +2

    Trump train already running Pritzger off the tracks, all Aboard!!!

    • @brandond6724
      @brandond6724 2 місяці тому +1

      CHUG A CHUG WHOO WHOO!!!!

  • @jeremymccage9213
    @jeremymccage9213 2 місяці тому

    Duhh

  • @Jjason601
    @Jjason601 2 місяці тому +1

    It’s not going to stop nothing people just going to go to other states and buy them

  • @JohnWalsh2019
    @JohnWalsh2019 2 місяці тому +3

    HAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHA! Sorry gov tubs you lost and will continue to. Not even your family's billions can make you a winner.

  • @Jaylay-2390
    @Jaylay-2390 2 місяці тому

    Let’s goooo

  • @nancystutes1869
    @nancystutes1869 2 місяці тому +2

    I'm just wondering y ppl who aren't in the military or at war need such high powered weapons? What do u plan to do with them? Hunt? I think that would be overkill. I'm really just wondering.

    • @FingersFew
      @FingersFew 2 місяці тому +7

      I actually do hunt (coyote)with mine. However I think you have bought into the lies of the media. The 2nd amendment is not about hunting. I’m a 36 year law enforcement officer and I support the right to bear arms for everyone. I’m appalled that I’ve been placed into a special class because of my career. To me it’s the equivalent of saying only people who have a computer science degree can own computers. This law is unconstitutional and needs to be abolished. I prefer dangerous freedom over safe slavery.

    • @georgerucker9263
      @georgerucker9263 2 місяці тому +3

      Stop wondering it will give u a headache. If someone breaks into your house who are you calling and why.

    • @georgerucker9263
      @georgerucker9263 2 місяці тому +3

      Stop asking questions and do your own research. If you want to have a real conversation based on actual facts we can do that. If you want a conversation about your feelings talk to yourself

    • @JTank11B
      @JTank11B 2 місяці тому +3

      @@nancystutes1869 No one needs a reason to own one. We are allowed to own one because the 2nd amendment says we can own one.

    • @georgerucker9263
      @georgerucker9263 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@JTank11B 😂😂😂 or 10