Are you looking to buy a Toyota Sequoia, Nissan Armada or any new vehicle? Go to carconfections.com/new-car-quotes to get the BEST price and access to invoice pricing information!
Good comparison. Nissan is the clear winner. The black and white interior as the only color choice in the Sequoia is a major fail. There should be at least a black and or tan interior option Unlike the Armada, the Sequoia doesn't offer a second row bench seat, which given the fact that many of these will be family haulers is a poor choice. I'd gladly give up the 3 mpg advantage the Toyota offers for the non-hybrid complexity of the Nissan. The interior of the Nissan is much more premium. I hope Nissan can survive as a company. Toyota needs competition because this generation of Sequoia is mediocre.
You didn't even mention the biggest drawback of the Sequoia: since they want back to a live rear axle, it now has the worst 3rd row and access to the 3rd row in the segment. Haven't personally driven all of them, but fairly positive it has the worst ride quality is well.
@@kendrickdelosreyes5381 It is a drawback and the use of the addtional shelf behind the third row is a clumsy attempt to increase usable space. A friend of mine considered a Sequoia Platinum and we took it for a test drive. It moved well, but he ride quality was medicore. She went with a Tahoe. They had a Capstone on the lot and we looked at that. It was a beautiful red, but openingthe door she said no way to the interior color combo. It just looks weird.
@@kendrickdelosreyes5381 Toyota fans would convince you the horrible reliability is the reason to live with the Sequoia’s twin-turbo V6 regardless of being worst in class everywhere other than power number and fuel economy. I’m convinced Toyota thinks Americans are dumb sheep that will keep them in business forever so they don’t have to invest nearly as much as their competitors. So far, Americans are proving them to be correct.
With the great interior of the Armada, you'll have a comfortable place to sit while waiting on a tow truck to pick you up after mechanical breakdown. But, Nissan is nicer and more class, I have just had amazing reliability from our toyotas and lexus vehicles, including a sequioa. Not so good luck with the other manufacturers.
Armada for me! As with the QX80 and LX, it’s a smack down. The Sequoia doesn’t even have the reliability advantage that it used to have with its defective Turbo V6 engine that is in the recalled Tundra and LX!
You can even get the Nissan for a few thousands off MSRP. The Nissan just looks better and tougher. The sequoia seats not folding down is a biggg oofff. The armada is a now a patrol that is rebadged, Nissan will never mess up this truck because it’s a legacy truck. The patrol has an insane cult following on the Middle East. The Japan government will never let Nissan die because it’s a legacy brand also. I am not worried, I actually bought some stock in Nissan because I like the direction Nissan is going now. The armada and frontier is the best in their class.
I'd still consider the Tahoe/Yukon to be king of the segment, but the Armada is a solid redesign by Nissan and absolutely crushes the Sequoia. It's not even close.
Before watching the video, i was thinking, Sequoia, hands down. After watching it, I'm like, dang... If i was in the market I'd probably be leaning toward the Armada. Nissan really stepped their game up!
Reliability and resale value should go out the window since Toyota has engine failures with this new engine. This is the issue no one ever sees or thinks about. The reason why Toyota even has good marks for reliability is they have 13 years to perfect drivetrains and platforms and simply the reason why people had 5 spd transmissions in a 2023 4Runner and rear drum brakes on a 2023 Tacoma TRD Pro... Its insane . But the second they change and launch new products, we have engine failures (they say have been fixed but theres documented proof that some people that got their engines replaced are still experiencing the same failures) in the Tundra/Sequoia and Lexus line, along with new 2024 Tacoma transmission issues. Meanwhile, Nissan's twin turbo V6 in the new Armada will most likely be more reliable as is it related to the GTR engine and that has been around for 17 years (since 2007).
@@ShiftinAt8600 I 100% agree. I would love for the Car Confection brothers to list specific resale value as it relates to models, vs the brand itself. The RAV4, Corolla and Camry carry the resale modeling for Toyota as a whole, and if we are using the 5-yr metric as the basis, a ton of that data includes the previous-gen Tundra, 4Runner, and Taco, which were almost always on top due to legendary reliability in powertrains. Now we Tundras with significant engine issues, Tacomas with transmissions that are breaking on auto journalists, so inevitably unreliable for consumers, and so on. Tundras were being turned away by dealers on trade because they knew they couldn't make as much money on them on resale due to the engine issues.
Not just becoz of battery placement..it is because of ancient solid axle instead of IRS ..cost cutting...never ever by new Toyota's from 2012 Camry....full of cheap plastics on any vehicles which gott redesigned after that
Armada for me. Two reasons - we have 2 dogs and they at least could be comfortable in the Armada. And the Armada has auto AWD, just like my Tahoe. It makes a huge difference.
As I've previously stated, it remains a huge mystery why Toyota decided to revert back to a solid axle design for the Sequoia(and please spare me the offroading argument, as GM(Z71), Nissan(PRO4-X), and Ford(Timberline) found a way around that while protecting their IRS suspension), which we all know is wayyy cheaper to produce than a multi-link IRS. With the Tahoe obviously setting the pace for the class, Toyota decided to revert back to the 90s versus following the path it set in 2008 with that IRS-equipped SUV. The packaging of the Sequoia is just unacceptable and the GH will definitely be the better choice for families that don't plan on doing a ton of towing or have a Tundra on standby. I was generally shocked by the poor road-going composure, ride quality, and body structure quakes of the Sequoia, again, reminding of the 90s big SUVs. Hop out of a Sequoia and into a GM triplet and it's a night and day difference. The Nissan is a quantum leap over the 2024 model in terms of tech and interior refinement. The styling will have to grow on me, but overall I'm impressed. The Nissan 5.6 V8 was a BEAST of an engine, if a little thirsty but super reliable. It will be missed. Nissan based this engine off of the hall of fame GT-R engine(obviously many components are different, but overall the design theme is similar), so hopefully it proves a worthy replacement.
Because Toyota doesn’t know how to compete. All the fangirls who say they’re more competitive than any other brand in existence are getting a rude wake up call. And this will not end well for them at all
Armada all day. You Toyota cultists have begun to get a rude awakening I wonder if the famous Toyota hater is laughing at everyone who is disappointed with the sequoia even though you likely laughed and insulted me when I said the sequoia is the most catastrophic redesign in a bad way.
Definitely the Nissan Armada for me. Toyota makes great products, but even aside from me being a Nissan fan all of the practical comparisons would make it a clear choice for me. Also when it comes to reliability Nissan has been doing a lot more turbo charging than Toyota, I wouldn’t hesitate to trust and expect a reliability from Nissan’s twin turbo V6.
The Armada comes out further ahead for a number of reasons. The resale and reliability stuff is meh for me, i wouldnt give out points for that but its all good.
Armada 100%, but would also 100% wait until the future of the company is certain. Imagine buying a $70k+ vehicle only for the manufacturer to cease to exist as we currently know it.
For sure! The Nissan lineup has some great options like the Rogue and the Altima, but if you're into something sportier, the Nissan Z is pretty awesome! As for the Toyota Sequoia, it’s a full-size SUV that's perfect for families or if you need a lot of space.
“As for the Toyota Sequoia, it’s perfect for families or If you need a lot of space”. I bet you didn’t even watch the video. Almost every family is looking for Escalade, Yukon, Armada, QX80, Expedition or the best selling Tahoe. The sequoia’s max cargo capacity is only 86 compared to 97 in the armada/qx80 and almost 120+ in the GM vehicles. The cargo capacity in the sequoia is the EXACT same as a Honda Pilot and even less a Toyota grand Highlander!
It's nice to see some positive comments about Nissan's for once. So many people dismiss them as a lesser Japanese vehicle but they actually have and still do make some really nice vehicles.
@@CarConfections Tahoe is actually should be considered as max 6 or 7 seater as there is no headrest on middle 3rd row seat..with recent refresh also Tahoe,GMC,Cadillac did not take care of that.pathetic .
Holy sheet! Cars have gotten so expensive! BTW, thanks so much for all your very informative reviews. You both offer the most outstanding presentations.
The Armada is clearly the better vehicle. I am not sure why Toyota made the decisions they made... frankly with all of their full-size SUVs. They are all way too compromised in some way. Meanwhile Nissan/Infiniti completely nailed it with the Armada/Patrol/QX80 when you consider their financial situation. I really think this new Armada is going to gain quite a bit of market share in this class. Also, the fact that the Armada is getting 20mpg+ in the real world in some reviews kinda makes the hybrid in the Sequoia not that much of an advantage, especially considering how much cargo room it eats up.
Oh Nissan, you don't know how long I waited for you to have second row sliding seats and an actual good third row! The design is really appealing as well even though everyone tells me Nissan are bad when it comes to engines.
How is not having a powered running board makes it harder to get in when it’s always there? I don’t understand that logic?🤔 I love the Armada for its styling and luxurious looks on the inside and Toyota for the reliability. In this case I’m rolling with the Armada
Have you considered that a 14 years old car may affect the value ? 2024 Armada is the same as 2010 Nissan Patrol, it’s normal that it will lose value because it’s an old vehicle
Armada PRO-4X for me. I was looking into the Sequoia, but for me the 2nd/3rd row comfort, cargo space, technology, and interior quality are better in the Armada. Resale value historically been worse for the Armada, but this is not a watered-down Patrol. This is the real deal.
Videos like this need the word “affordable” in quotations. These are far from affordable and that armada is no different 😭. If u get the base trims yeah. But these fully loaded SUVs without luxury badges are digging in the pockets of many
Quality and resale value, Toyota as a whole is higher than Nissan, however with their complex hybrid engine I’m putting my money on the GTR engine on the Nissan and much more cargo area and better handling and ride
I’m a Toyota guy but if I was going full size witch I will in 3 years I’m sale my 2023 Toyota tundra for a Nissan armada I’m wait till all the flaws are gonna be set with Nissan then go buy a brand new one and trade in my truck for the platinum reserve in white
bros - me want the NISSAN. okay now I'm gonna watch this juicy comparison vid. the interior of the Armada is lux - no patio furniture surfaces ( lol ) thanks guys, this was a good one.
I OWNED 2 ARMADAS BECAUSE OF THE OPEN WINDOW IN THE TAILGATE SINCE THEY HAD DISCONTINUED IT I SWITCHED TO THE SEQUOIA ALSO THE TURN RADIUS I TAKE THE SEQUOIA HANDS DOWN
The sequoia could be a better choice if it was a little bit more room behind the the 3rd row and cargo area I think Toyota should reevaluate the sequoia and make it bigger if they want to be successful in the full-size segment
You guys forgot to mention or score the new technology nissan added to the armada. It can sense if someone is hot or cold and increase their cooling or heat.
lol! No. Wow. Not very informed I see. Armada is a rebadged Nissan Patrol…which we should just be calling it that. But it’s what it is. Patrol’s classic competition is the Land Cruiser. Not the Sequoia. From a size standpoint, this makes sense today. But from a ruggedness, quality, reliability, maintenance, and off-road overlanding capability standpoint, the Patrol has been the Land Cruiser challenger. The QX80 is simply the upscale brand version of the Patrol, much like the Lexus LX trim version of the Land Cruiser has been. Oddly, the Toyota flagship has been the Land Cruiser though. Not really the Lexus. The identity of the Land Cruiser overshadows the Toyota badge…and really the Lexus as well. Patrol has essentially done the same. The luxury brand is posh, not really better or more premium in the case of these two…though the jury is still out on the current Land Cruiser/LX. So if you want to pay more for posh, but not capability or premium components, go ahead. The Patrol is the prestigious “brand” identity in this case. And in the US, we strangely call it Armada. 🤷🏻♂️
nissan should be able to win this one Toyota did horrible job with sequioa expect for exterior. everything else on the totota is not good big outside small inside. rides like a truck bouncing around, tech is outdated on new vehicle and interior looks like a cheap truck with poverty buttons everywhere even on platinum model. I ended up buying 24 expedition because the outgoing ford did everything better than a fully redesigned toyota. New Armada was not out so I couldn't compare but interior pictures alone looks miles ahead of a sequoia interior. My only concern with Nissan is durability. I bought a 16 Murano platinum new for my mom, and around the 5-year mark with 30k miles on It; the leather seats and door panels started splitting, and it has trim pieces that have come unglued. meanwhile my 16 f150 with 160k on still looks new inside. my 08 Pontiac leather seats finally show 1st tear after 16 years and this was stiching coming loose not rip in leather. basically, I think Nissan uses cheap parts in their vehicles because i think seats are bonded leather like cheap leather sofa.
Nissan/Infiniti appears to be in come-back mode, and with the Honda merger….this will give the conglomerate the full size body-on frame SUV’s Honda lacked.
The sequoia is nice but not for 8 hours. We took our aunts capstone on a 8 hour trip to South Carolina. It’s by far the worst in the segment which it comes to space and packaging 2nd row and back. The cargo space is absolutely terrible because we needed the 3rd row. Is about as bad as our 3rd generation Highlander. And the weirdest part I find is the 2nd row seats not being able to move foward. That creates a big issue because the cargo space is bad. So you’d think that if the 3rd row moves foward, the 2nd row will too. It’s backwards. The cargo “management” system isn’t very manageable when you have 6 people in total. Moving away from that independent suspension was the worst idea possible because it’s Toyotas “largest” suv but it doesn’t stay true to that title. I feel like getting a grand Highlander is the better investment for people looking at a sequoia.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Are you looking to buy a Toyota Sequoia, Nissan Armada or any new vehicle? Go to carconfections.com/new-car-quotes to get the BEST price and access to invoice pricing information!
Good comparison. Nissan is the clear winner. The black and white interior as the only color choice in the Sequoia is a major fail. There should be at least a black and or tan interior option Unlike the Armada, the Sequoia doesn't offer a second row bench seat, which given the fact that many of these will be family haulers is a poor choice. I'd gladly give up the 3 mpg advantage the Toyota offers for the non-hybrid complexity of the Nissan. The interior of the Nissan is much more premium. I hope Nissan can survive as a company. Toyota needs competition because this generation of Sequoia is mediocre.
You didn't even mention the biggest drawback of the Sequoia: since they want back to a live rear axle, it now has the worst 3rd row and access to the 3rd row in the segment. Haven't personally driven all of them, but fairly positive it has the worst ride quality is well.
@@kendrickdelosreyes5381 It is a drawback and the use of the addtional shelf behind the third row is a clumsy attempt to increase usable space. A friend of mine considered a Sequoia Platinum and we took it for a test drive. It moved well, but he ride quality was medicore. She went with a Tahoe. They had a Capstone on the lot and we looked at that. It was a beautiful red, but openingthe door she said no way to the interior color combo. It just looks weird.
@@kendrickdelosreyes5381 Toyota fans would convince you the horrible reliability is the reason to live with the Sequoia’s twin-turbo V6 regardless of being worst in class everywhere other than power number and fuel economy. I’m convinced Toyota thinks Americans are dumb sheep that will keep them in business forever so they don’t have to invest nearly as much as their competitors. So far, Americans are proving them to be correct.
Nissan will survive, if just as the Kia to Honda’s Hyundai
Nissan Amanda for me over Toyota sequoia both are good but the exterior and interior of the Amanda captures my attention
*Armada
With the great interior of the Armada, you'll have a comfortable place to sit while waiting on a tow truck to pick you up after mechanical breakdown.
But, Nissan is nicer and more class, I have just had amazing reliability from our toyotas and lexus vehicles, including a sequioa. Not so good luck with the other manufacturers.
Both are good, Armada is clearly better.
200% Armada for me!
Armada for me! As with the QX80 and LX, it’s a smack down. The Sequoia doesn’t even have the reliability advantage that it used to have with its defective Turbo V6 engine that is in the recalled Tundra and LX!
@@limitedreach4446 tha ingen recalled is only on tundra non hybrid
same engine as Tundra and we all know how reliable it has been.
You can even get the Nissan for a few thousands off MSRP. The Nissan just looks better and tougher. The sequoia seats not folding down is a biggg oofff. The armada is a now a patrol that is rebadged, Nissan will never mess up this truck because it’s a legacy truck. The patrol has an insane cult following on the Middle East. The Japan government will never let Nissan die because it’s a legacy brand also. I am not worried, I actually bought some stock in Nissan because I like the direction Nissan is going now. The armada and frontier is the best in their class.
Nissan Armada easily
I'd still consider the Tahoe/Yukon to be king of the segment, but the Armada is a solid redesign by Nissan and absolutely crushes the Sequoia. It's not even close.
I own a Sequoia and my seats fold down flat
Tahoe is not king I'll take it on any day in my Sequoia 24 valves double over head cam
@@josephwatson2711 ... it's all good bro. Just an opinion.
The Sequoia seats do not fold flat? Sent those engineers back to school!!
Armada is better in every way.
Before watching the video, i was thinking, Sequoia, hands down. After watching it, I'm like, dang... If i was in the market I'd probably be leaning toward the Armada. Nissan really stepped their game up!
A lot of people saying that Sequoia has a lot of plastic inside
Reliability and resale value should go out the window since Toyota has engine failures with this new engine. This is the issue no one ever sees or thinks about.
The reason why Toyota even has good marks for reliability is they have 13 years to perfect drivetrains and platforms and simply the reason why people had 5 spd transmissions in a 2023 4Runner and rear drum brakes on a 2023 Tacoma TRD Pro... Its insane .
But the second they change and launch new products, we have engine failures (they say have been fixed but theres documented proof that some people that got their engines replaced are still experiencing the same failures) in the Tundra/Sequoia and Lexus line, along with new 2024 Tacoma transmission issues.
Meanwhile, Nissan's twin turbo V6 in the new Armada will most likely be more reliable as is it related to the GTR engine and that has been around for 17 years (since 2007).
@@ShiftinAt8600 I 100% agree. I would love for the Car Confection brothers to list specific resale value as it relates to models, vs the brand itself. The RAV4, Corolla and Camry carry the resale modeling for Toyota as a whole, and if we are using the 5-yr metric as the basis, a ton of that data includes the previous-gen Tundra, 4Runner, and Taco, which were almost always on top due to legendary reliability in powertrains. Now we Tundras with significant engine issues, Tacomas with transmissions that are breaking on auto journalists, so inevitably unreliable for consumers, and so on. Tundras were being turned away by dealers on trade because they knew they couldn't make as much money on them on resale due to the engine issues.
Could you point us to the evidence that replaced engines are still facing issues?
Opinions are not facts. Nissan is no competition to Toyota. Nissan is also inefficient. Always was, always is.
@@quinty26 and so they deserve to go out of business.
Excellent comparison of two solid options!
Next do the 2025 Expedition vs 2025 Tahoe/Suburban when yall get your hands on one and then do an epic showdown between the 4 of them.
Sad day when even Nissan takes out Toyotas' current cost cutting business strategy.
Agreed. Nissan is now better than Toyota. What a world we live in where Toyota and Lexus are far worse than Infiniti
As a Toyota fanboy I’m skip sequoia and go for armada or qx80 😢
Toyota really messed up with putting a battery in it causing it to have the space issues
Should have done what they did with the tundra give it either gas or hybrid better 3 row car whould have been a success
Not just becoz of battery placement..it is because of ancient solid axle instead of IRS ..cost cutting...never ever by new Toyota's from 2012 Camry....full of cheap plastics on any vehicles which gott redesigned after that
Armada for me. Two reasons - we have 2 dogs and they at least could be comfortable in the Armada. And the Armada has auto AWD, just like my Tahoe. It makes a huge difference.
The Sequoia doesn’t have auto/part time 4wd?
Nissan V6 is excellent, and with twin turbo's I'm starting to get GTR vibes.
These objective comparisons have gotten so good! Great video
Thanks!
Hey you guys are great…my brothers and I grew up rebuilding old muscle cars….cool to share with each other….your reviews are all great
As I've previously stated, it remains a huge mystery why Toyota decided to revert back to a solid axle design for the Sequoia(and please spare me the offroading argument, as GM(Z71), Nissan(PRO4-X), and Ford(Timberline) found a way around that while protecting their IRS suspension), which we all know is wayyy cheaper to produce than a multi-link IRS. With the Tahoe obviously setting the pace for the class, Toyota decided to revert back to the 90s versus following the path it set in 2008 with that IRS-equipped SUV. The packaging of the Sequoia is just unacceptable and the GH will definitely be the better choice for families that don't plan on doing a ton of towing or have a Tundra on standby. I was generally shocked by the poor road-going composure, ride quality, and body structure quakes of the Sequoia, again, reminding of the 90s big SUVs. Hop out of a Sequoia and into a GM triplet and it's a night and day difference.
The Nissan is a quantum leap over the 2024 model in terms of tech and interior refinement. The styling will have to grow on me, but overall I'm impressed. The Nissan 5.6 V8 was a BEAST of an engine, if a little thirsty but super reliable. It will be missed. Nissan based this engine off of the hall of fame GT-R engine(obviously many components are different, but overall the design theme is similar), so hopefully it proves a worthy replacement.
Because Toyota doesn’t know how to compete. All the fangirls who say they’re more competitive than any other brand in existence are getting a rude wake up call. And this will not end well for them at all
The Toyota chassis is shared across other models. It's a global off roading, solid axle chassis, meant to last.
Armada all day. You Toyota cultists have begun to get a rude awakening
I wonder if the famous Toyota hater is laughing at everyone who is disappointed with the sequoia even though you likely laughed and insulted me when I said the sequoia is the most catastrophic redesign in a bad way.
Armada all day. It’s the only one that can legitimately compete with the Americans from Japan
Definitely the Nissan Armada for me. Toyota makes great products, but even aside from me being a Nissan fan all of the practical comparisons would make it a clear choice for me. Also when it comes to reliability Nissan has been doing a lot more turbo charging than Toyota, I wouldn’t hesitate to trust and expect a reliability from Nissan’s twin turbo V6.
I hope you can feature a comparison between the new Nissan Murano and Toyota Crown Signa.
Coming soon!
I wouldn't consider either over the new Tahoe/ Yuokon or Expedition but the Nissan is better between the two.
The Armada comes out further ahead for a number of reasons.
The resale and reliability stuff is meh for me, i wouldnt give out points for that but its all good.
That Armada can actually go toe to toe with the Lexus LX.Most say it drives more like a luxury car
Armada 100%, but would also 100% wait until the future of the company is certain. Imagine buying a $70k+ vehicle only for the manufacturer to cease to exist as we currently know it.
For sure! The Nissan lineup has some great options like the Rogue and the Altima, but if you're into something sportier, the Nissan Z is pretty awesome!
As for the Toyota Sequoia, it’s a full-size SUV that's perfect for families or if you need a lot of space.
“As for the Toyota Sequoia, it’s perfect for families or If you need a lot of space”.
I bet you didn’t even watch the video. Almost every family is looking for Escalade, Yukon, Armada, QX80, Expedition or the best selling Tahoe. The sequoia’s max cargo capacity is only 86 compared to 97 in the armada/qx80 and almost 120+ in the GM vehicles. The cargo capacity in the sequoia is the EXACT same as a Honda Pilot and even less a Toyota grand Highlander!
Your car reviews are top-notch. Always informative and fun to watch!
Thank you! Happy New Year!
Nissan Armada 👍🏻👍🏻
You are amazing, big overview.
I love that you noted Toyota’s stupid subscription service. It should earn a .5 deduction because of how consumer unfriendly it is.
It's nice to see some positive comments about Nissan's for once. So many people dismiss them as a lesser Japanese vehicle but they actually have and still do make some really nice vehicles.
Great video. Would love an Armada and Tahoe comparison.
We'll have to put that on our list of comparisons to do, thanks for the suggestion!
@@CarConfections
Tahoe is actually should be considered as max 6 or 7 seater as there is no headrest on middle 3rd row seat..with recent refresh also Tahoe,GMC,Cadillac did not take care of that.pathetic .
Both are great but Nissan is the way to go it’s a very good car ❤
And this particular case, even the Nissan’s engine is more proven than the Toyotas as of right now
100% Facts!
Nissan armada is best suv segment car in USA in terms of technology and driving experience
Holy sheet! Cars have gotten so expensive! BTW, thanks so much for all your very informative reviews. You both offer the most outstanding presentations.
Thanks so much!
If you need usable 3rd row, the only option here is Nissan. Sequoia 3rd row is only for kids.
The Armada is clearly the better vehicle. I am not sure why Toyota made the decisions they made... frankly with all of their full-size SUVs. They are all way too compromised in some way. Meanwhile Nissan/Infiniti completely nailed it with the Armada/Patrol/QX80 when you consider their financial situation. I really think this new Armada is going to gain quite a bit of market share in this class. Also, the fact that the Armada is getting 20mpg+ in the real world in some reviews kinda makes the hybrid in the Sequoia not that much of an advantage, especially considering how much cargo room it eats up.
Superb comparison I've been waiting for. You guys are excellent with unbiased and knowledgeable reviews. Cheers
Thanks, we appreciate that!
Oh Nissan, you don't know how long I waited for you to have second row sliding seats and an actual good third row! The design is really appealing as well even though everyone tells me Nissan are bad when it comes to engines.
Nissan has generally had solid engines. It was more so the CVTs (transmissions) that were the problem.
Armada! I love the Sequoia looks but the third row and cargo space is not practical at all . Also Nissan has a proven engine base off the GTR
Nissan came out punching with their 2025 models
Love your comparison drives
THE DARK BULE LOOKS GOOD!
How is not having a powered running board makes it harder to get in when it’s always there? I don’t understand that logic?🤔 I love the Armada for its styling and luxurious looks on the inside and Toyota for the reliability. In this case I’m rolling with the Armada
When they're power deploying, they are wider (so you don't have to turn your feet sideways) and lower to the ground
After 2.5 years and 33kmiles, my new Platinum Armada is appraised at half the price.
Something to consider!
Have you considered that a 14 years old car may affect the value ? 2024 Armada is the same as 2010 Nissan Patrol, it’s normal that it will lose value because it’s an old vehicle
@@abdulazizalmnsor2237 lmao the same could be said for the Sequoia, have u looked at the resale value of both?
One thing you should have mentioned is that the Sequoia has a part-time 4WD system (functional only at low speeds) compared to the Nissans full-time.
Great comparisons and great job!
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!
The Nissan Armada IMO is a better overall option. This vehicle will do well.
Armada PRO-4X for me. I was looking into the Sequoia, but for me the 2nd/3rd row comfort, cargo space, technology, and interior quality are better in the Armada. Resale value historically been worse for the Armada, but this is not a watered-down Patrol. This is the real deal.
outside USA, the Patrol resale value depreciation is almost the same with the Land Cruisers
From my point of view the Armada wins by a huge margin against the Sequoia. However, I prefer the QX80 even more.
Armada better
Videos like this need the word “affordable” in quotations. These are far from affordable and that armada is no different 😭. If u get the base trims yeah. But these fully loaded SUVs without luxury badges are digging in the pockets of many
$87,000 for a car mind blowing !
I mean you could get the base model
Have you done Armada vs Tahoe yet
Quality and resale value, Toyota as a whole is higher than Nissan, however with their complex hybrid engine I’m putting my money on the GTR engine on the Nissan and much more cargo area and better handling and ride
Both are excellent.
No way in hell I'd buy any Toyota with that 3.4 TT V6 in it. That engine has a terrible reputation at this point.
I’m a Toyota guy but if I was going full size witch I will in 3 years I’m sale my 2023 Toyota tundra for a Nissan armada I’m wait till all the flaws are gonna be set with Nissan then go buy a brand new one and trade in my truck for the platinum reserve in white
bros - me want the NISSAN. okay now I'm gonna watch this juicy comparison vid. the interior of the Armada is lux - no patio furniture surfaces ( lol ) thanks guys, this was a good one.
What vehicle were u guys sitting in with the red interior
I OWNED 2 ARMADAS BECAUSE OF THE OPEN WINDOW IN THE TAILGATE SINCE THEY HAD DISCONTINUED IT I SWITCHED TO THE SEQUOIA ALSO THE TURN RADIUS I TAKE THE SEQUOIA HANDS DOWN
with the hybrid is it true that when driving below 40 kmh the hybrid works but when driving over that speed the gas kicks in
Nissan Armada is clear Winner❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉
When is Toyota gonna realize that space behind the third row is needed
The sequoia could be a better choice if it was a little bit more room behind the the 3rd row and cargo area I think Toyota should reevaluate the sequoia and make it bigger if they want to be successful in the full-size segment
They won’t. They’ll probably discontinue it. This is one of the many examples where Toyota doesn’t known how to compete
The Armada is perfect with those fold over rear seats so I can stretch out and take a nap
Nissan Armada I got one it’s an 2005 but she rides damn good
Nissan Patrol/ Armada 🎉
I’ll buy the new, redesigned Armada.
Great review. I'd rather just buy 8 2003 Sequoias before I get either of these 😂
You guys forgot to mention or score the new technology nissan added to the armada. It can sense if someone is hot or cold and increase their cooling or heat.
You mean American heavyweight (Sequoia) vs Japanese heavyweight (Patrol/Armada)
Armada for sure!😊
So Armada is a rebadged QX80!
lol! No. Wow. Not very informed I see. Armada is a rebadged Nissan Patrol…which we should just be calling it that. But it’s what it is. Patrol’s classic competition is the Land Cruiser. Not the Sequoia. From a size standpoint, this makes sense today. But from a ruggedness, quality, reliability, maintenance, and off-road overlanding capability standpoint, the Patrol has been the Land Cruiser challenger.
The QX80 is simply the upscale brand version of the Patrol, much like the Lexus LX trim version of the Land Cruiser has been.
Oddly, the Toyota flagship has been the Land Cruiser though. Not really the Lexus. The identity of the Land Cruiser overshadows the Toyota badge…and really the Lexus as well.
Patrol has essentially done the same. The luxury brand is posh, not really better or more premium in the case of these two…though the jury is still out on the current Land Cruiser/LX.
So if you want to pay more for posh, but not capability or premium components, go ahead. The Patrol is the prestigious “brand” identity in this case. And in the US, we strangely call it Armada. 🤷🏻♂️
Toyota sequoia All day long you can keep that Nissan.
One Made By Japanese humans at the Yukuhashi Kyushu plant while the other in the states
3 year lease or car hire=the Armada
For a 25 year investment and longevity= Sequoia
I don't like the Armada's gear shifter...but apart from that I like everything about it.
The amount of complexity in the sequoia to get only 3 more mpg is ridiculous. I know it's combined but that's insane.
it's to have more power and the i-Force Max twin trubo v6 hybrid emits less harmful pollutants per mile driven than a traditional twin-turbo V6.
nissan should be able to win this one Toyota did horrible job with sequioa expect for exterior. everything else on the totota is not good big outside small inside. rides like a truck bouncing around, tech is outdated on new vehicle and interior looks like a cheap truck with poverty buttons everywhere even on platinum model. I ended up buying 24 expedition because the outgoing ford did everything better than a fully redesigned toyota. New Armada was not out so I couldn't compare but interior pictures alone looks miles ahead of a sequoia interior. My only concern with Nissan is durability. I bought a 16 Murano platinum new for my mom, and around the 5-year mark with 30k miles on It; the leather seats and door panels started splitting, and it has trim pieces that have come unglued. meanwhile my 16 f150 with 160k on still looks new inside. my 08 Pontiac leather seats finally show 1st tear after 16 years and this was stiching coming loose not rip in leather. basically, I think Nissan uses cheap parts in their vehicles because i think seats are bonded leather like cheap leather sofa.
Going for the Amanda!
It's the Datsun in Pro4x for me!
The Nissan Armada for me
Nissan Armada all day every day
The sequoia fumble is just hard for me to fathom.
Why not go another 10-15k and get the new Infinity qx80 ? They seem to be priced too high for this segment
Armada for the win!
Sequoia
This is what Im waiting for, if tge Armada beats the Sequoia it will definitely beats the LC300,
Armada is clearly the winner
Nissan/Infiniti appears to be in come-back mode, and with the Honda merger….this will give the conglomerate the full size body-on frame SUV’s Honda lacked.
The sequoia is nice but not for 8 hours. We took our aunts capstone on a 8 hour trip to South Carolina. It’s by far the worst in the segment which it comes to space and packaging 2nd row and back. The cargo space is absolutely terrible because we needed the 3rd row. Is about as bad as our 3rd generation Highlander. And the weirdest part I find is the 2nd row seats not being able to move foward.
That creates a big issue because the cargo space is bad. So you’d think that if the 3rd row moves foward, the 2nd row will too. It’s backwards. The cargo “management” system isn’t very manageable when you have 6 people in total. Moving away from that independent suspension was the worst idea possible because it’s Toyotas “largest” suv but it doesn’t stay true to that title. I feel like getting a grand Highlander is the better investment for people looking at a sequoia.
Although Toyota has a history of reliability, the Armada leads for full size SUV’s.