incredibly naive "drama"-rethorical thinking. The reason everyone is jumping ship is clearly and stated numerous times the oposite: OpenAI and Sam Altman are pursuing AGI at all cost, at the cost of security for pure profit, and thats why all the leaders are jumping ship, simply because its not only a villainous attitude Sam Altman has on this, but its also dishonest and deceitful towards anyone involved in business with his approach, but your "conclusion" is magically the oposite and most complex non-plausable scenario : That somehow all of those ship-jumpers are hiding the "true" reason, which is AGI is not even close and they just mislike Sam Altman trying now to cash in and head for the hills, despite of every single one of them trying to warn the public and the world in general of OpenAIs dangerous aproach and that theyre even moving the goal post further and further to avoid having to admit that theyre about to reach AGI very soon if they havent already internally. Like any technical machine learning engineer will be able to tell you, and they all say the same: Even without any breakthrough in reasoning or machine sentience, compute and synthetic data alone scaled up will alone be enough to perfectly simulate general intelligence enough to cover any subject or matter we humans have and will encounter for a couple hundred years at the least. It doesnt have to be -real- AGI if compute alone can >simulate< AGI at human level, it just wont be able to reach true AGI at a superhuman level with that method alone. Simulated /parroting human level "AGI" is more than enough to be able to do any cognative and intellectual or academic human job at PHD level without hallusinations given enough compute. Youre also falsely phrasing what newly-quitted UA-camr David Shapiro said as reasons for quitting: He was confident AGI will be reached very quickly now, and that there are so many competent people in that field now both developing it and covering it in media that he feels he has nothing unique to offer on the subject enough to be worth his time and energy, and that AI or tech has never been his main interest to begin with - nature and human health has always been his love-child and thats what he wants to pursue with his wife on his other original UA-cam-channel. Its clear that you guys clearly have very little technical competence about the subject youre trying to narrate, and that youre falling into the classical Dunning Kruger-trap of trying to make sense and re-interpret matters you simply do not understand well enough.
incredibly naive "drama"-rethorical thinking. The reason everyone is jumping ship is clearly and stated numerous times the oposite: OpenAI and Sam Altman are pursuing AGI at all cost, at the cost of security for pure profit, and thats why all the leaders are jumping ship, simply because its not only a villainous attitude Sam Altman has on this, but its also dishonest and deceitful towards anyone involved in business with his approach, but your "conclusion" is magically the oposite and most complex non-plausable scenario : That somehow all of those ship-jumpers are hiding the "true" reason, which is AGI is not even close and they just mislike Sam Altman trying now to cash in and head for the hills, despite of every single one of them trying to warn the public and the world in general of OpenAIs dangerous aproach and that theyre even moving the goal post further and further to avoid having to admit that theyre about to reach AGI very soon if they havent already internally.
Like any technical machine learning engineer will be able to tell you, and they all say the same: Even without any breakthrough in reasoning or machine sentience, compute and synthetic data alone scaled up will alone be enough to perfectly simulate general intelligence enough to cover any subject or matter we humans have and will encounter for a couple hundred years at the least. It doesnt have to be -real- AGI if compute alone can >simulate< AGI at human level, it just wont be able to reach true AGI at a superhuman level with that method alone. Simulated /parroting human level "AGI" is more than enough to be able to do any cognative and intellectual or academic human job at PHD level without hallusinations given enough compute.
Youre also falsely phrasing what newly-quitted UA-camr David Shapiro said as reasons for quitting: He was confident AGI will be reached very quickly now, and that there are so many competent people in that field now both developing it and covering it in media that he feels he has nothing unique to offer on the subject enough to be worth his time and energy, and that AI or tech has never been his main interest to begin with - nature and human health has always been his love-child and thats what he wants to pursue with his wife on his other original UA-cam-channel.
Its clear that you guys clearly have very little technical competence about the subject youre trying to narrate, and that youre falling into the classical Dunning Kruger-trap of trying to make sense and re-interpret matters you simply do not understand well enough.