They miss clicked

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • [Streamed Live on 22nd November, 2023]
    Stream: / joshuaschmidtygo
    Main Channel: / @joshuaschmidtygo
    VOD Channel: / @joshuaschmidtvod
    Twitter: / gamebreak0r
    Channel managed by: Tyl0o | / tyl0o
    #JoshuaSchmidt #stream #yugioh

КОМЕНТАРІ • 510

  • @tehy123
    @tehy123 10 місяців тому +102

    Konami in Duel Links: try not to hit URs because it hurts players too much financially
    Konami in Master Duel: try not to hit URs because it helps players too much financially

    • @thepoweroftheweed2215
      @thepoweroftheweed2215 10 місяців тому +6

      Nah in Duel Links too it would help players, they ain't opening a box three times if a card is at two

    • @Flomdcho
      @Flomdcho 10 місяців тому +7

      Komoney: how do we make the most money

    • @FrostReave
      @FrostReave 10 місяців тому +1

      Like the fact that Konami seriously think they can manage the game without hitting UR's is ludicrous. Konami needs to stop jumping at the short term profits for the long term. I half blame the community that continues to reward Konami for this nonsense too. Any other playerbase would have revolted by now.

  • @WilliFR
    @WilliFR 10 місяців тому +74

    Konami saw 1 guy played 1 game with 3 diameter, won, never played 3 diameter ever again and in the stats they saw "Diameter at 3 has 100%WR? we need to do something"

  • @razielfaustus9733
    @razielfaustus9733 10 місяців тому +9

    Ngl the fountain hit is pretty pog

  • @pieromorantearenaza4801
    @pieromorantearenaza4801 10 місяців тому +155

    MD players: complaining about Konami using the ban list as a way to amplify profits.
    DL players: First time?

    • @HunterStiles651
      @HunterStiles651 10 місяців тому +9

      Even the TCG has always had this problem. It's like getting mad at the tides for sinking your boat. And this banlist was pretty good all things considered.

    • @LightshaverConstellation
      @LightshaverConstellation 10 місяців тому +6

      The tcg has this problem much worse. Md is honestly generous enough with gems that I am surprised they make profit.

    • @xTxCxMx
      @xTxCxMx 10 місяців тому +15

      @@LightshaverConstellation the MD whales whale HARD, and the people who aren't whales but want to play every new deck make them an alright chunk of change too. But like, look at the cost if a full royal rare deck.

    • @brago900
      @brago900 10 місяців тому +6

      Literally every card game does this. Magic bans entire boxes every time they release a new box, at least in Yugioh only specific cards are hit.
      This way you can at least continue playing the decks you like, in magic you can't even do that.

    • @Fighterman481
      @Fighterman481 10 місяців тому +5

      @@brago900 I think you're misunderstanding how Magic's meta works. Magic isn't like Yugioh, where archetypes are xenophobic; often you'll see decks like "red-green aggro" or "black-white sacrifice" or similar. Those decks aren't the type that are wiped out by a set being legal, they may lose a few tools, but they're not getting banned wholesale by any means. And even in decks that revolve around one specific card or interaction, if that card goes out of rotation then that's really not much different than, say, Yugioh banning the dragon rulers.
      Plus, you can just go play Modern or Pioneer or Pauper or Legacy or one of the many other formats that don't rotate (and yes, those all see play, it's not like Time Wizard format where it's just a sideshow)

  • @codynelson7575
    @codynelson7575 10 місяців тому +200

    I can think of worse hits to mathmech...Addition, Substraction, Magma, Division, Link Disicple, Runick Tip

    • @IyoMaestro
      @IyoMaestro 10 місяців тому +33

      Ban Final Sigma it is simply too strong in Mathmech!

    • @al2PRO
      @al2PRO 10 місяців тому +11

      ​@@IyoMaestrolmaoo 🤣🤣 can't deal with towers over there 👀?
      Answer: white woman jump scare

    • @SenHnk
      @SenHnk 10 місяців тому +29

      Runick tip would indeed be an extremely bad bit for mathmech

    • @cvubini
      @cvubini 10 місяців тому +10

      bro dont give them ideas what will i do if final sigma is at 1 and my opponents kashtira unicorn banishes it??? I can't think of any monster I can make with 3 mathmechs that would win me the game

    • @lordofgarbageprogenitoroft4147
      @lordofgarbageprogenitoroft4147 10 місяців тому +1

      😅😅😅

  • @Control_Devil
    @Control_Devil 10 місяців тому +82

    this reminds me exactly of that one time i searched for diameter instead of circular with cynet mining

    • @SenHnk
      @SenHnk 10 місяців тому +1

      Did you have circular in hand already?

    • @cvubini
      @cvubini 10 місяців тому

      no they were just bming probably before going for game@@SenHnk

    • @nigerianprinceajani
      @nigerianprinceajani 10 місяців тому

      Propably after Imperm on D'Alembert

    • @happo6449
      @happo6449 10 місяців тому

      I sometimes do that when I open another mathmech lol

    • @zackmhuntr25
      @zackmhuntr25 10 місяців тому

      Hey Lois

  • @prestonbeaulieu4379
    @prestonbeaulieu4379 10 місяців тому +80

    If you think this is the worst MD banlist, you should really look at the first couple MD banlists. It would be good content

    • @HunterStiles651
      @HunterStiles651 10 місяців тому +24

      Pretty much yeah. This banlist may not have gone as far as Josh would like, but at least it didn't look at a format that was basically unplayable and declare "This is fine. This format does not need any major course correction." This is what last month's banlist, which WAS worse banlist ever material, should've been.

    • @stardust9470
      @stardust9470 10 місяців тому +25

      Conq to 1 and Analyser to 2 when the problem cards were floodgates and Block Dragon.Laolao to 2 when the problem was VFD and Long Yuan to 2 when the problem card is Protos

    • @hurrdurrmurrgurr
      @hurrdurrmurrgurr 10 місяців тому +4

      VFD to 1!

  • @verbalengine95
    @verbalengine95 10 місяців тому +102

    Banning sigma would have been funny

    • @sahilm483
      @sahilm483 10 місяців тому +2

      GIGACHAD

    • @soulevans7588
      @soulevans7588 10 місяців тому +3

      That would be a sigma hit indeed

    • @krnova5
      @krnova5 4 місяці тому +1

      no

  • @Salacavalini
    @Salacavalini 10 місяців тому +95

    As a Labrynth player, the best way to hit the deck is to ban EEV and Dimensional Barrier. Keeps the deck playable while getting rid of non-interactive auto-win cards that result in non-games.

    • @VixYW
      @VixYW 10 місяців тому +9

      They're still way too good without the insta win BS.

    • @dantevic
      @dantevic 10 місяців тому +30

      @@VixYW ash hurts them hard.

    • @airbomb24
      @airbomb24 10 місяців тому +8

      eev is prettyyl toxic ngl

    • @VixYW
      @VixYW 10 місяців тому +1

      @@dantevic Yeah, but the timing needs to be perfect, and sometimes they'll summon the monster that forbids response to their traps (dunno if it's lovely or lady) before activating the trap you needed to Ash. So it doesn't hurt them as hard as it hurts other decks.

    • @dantevic
      @dantevic 10 місяців тому +14

      @@VixYW its lovely and 99% of the time they need the trap to summon her, so you can just ash it. Only lady can be SS from the hand easily.

  • @spicymemes7458
    @spicymemes7458 10 місяців тому +17

    Im here just to watch Josh punch the air over Diameter

  • @youtubeenjoyer7279
    @youtubeenjoyer7279 10 місяців тому +71

    as much as possible they dont want to refund UR dust imo
    that's why the hit seems to miss.

    • @tripleaaabattery8480
      @tripleaaabattery8480 10 місяців тому +5

      There have been lists where they hit like 5 UR cards

    • @yuseifudo6075
      @yuseifudo6075 10 місяців тому +24

      ​@@tripleaaabattery8480this is not what generally happens

    • @youtubeenjoyer7279
      @youtubeenjoyer7279 10 місяців тому +9

      @@tripleaaabattery8480 that's why i said "as much as possible" 😅😅😅

    • @trizard1186
      @trizard1186 10 місяців тому +14

      The only reason they limited cynet mining is because most got it from the salad structure deck

    • @dahnavonpippen6547
      @dahnavonpippen6547 10 місяців тому +4

      I’ve been saying this from the start and Tear confirmed it for me. I knew the Purrely hit would be Delicious, my friend, or a cat off of rarity alone. I knew this from release. I figured if kash became meta, they would hit Shangri and birth.

  • @brago900
    @brago900 10 місяців тому +4

    Two common patterns are:
    1. They do not ban cards that they believe will affect the sales of the boxes that are currently available.
    2. They don't like hitting high rarity cards so they try to juggle to avoid it until the hit becomes inevitable (sometimes the juggling surprisingly works and sometimes it doesn't).
    In general, since the banlist is monthly, they have much more room to experiment with alternatives to the hits given in TCG and OCG.

  • @othonn_
    @othonn_ 10 місяців тому +15

    I feel the real problem is that we dont have dev blogs or smth where they explain their thought process. I've come from LoL where we have extended dev blogs about pretty much every aspect of game, so we may not agree with them but at least we know why they are doing things. Even Marvel Snap has small blogs after every patch...

    • @xCorvus7x
      @xCorvus7x 10 місяців тому +4

      That would indeed be great, although it's already pretty neat that whatever you write them about actually seems to get an answer.

    • @danha3107
      @danha3107 10 місяців тому +2

      LoR also has at least small dev notes on balance changes, absolutely goated team and card game

    • @milesandrews6711
      @milesandrews6711 10 місяців тому +4

      The problem is that if they were to do this it would be extremely transparent what they want out of the Banlist
      It's like MBT said, they can't exactly write
      "We want money" under the explanations to why a card is banned

    • @xCorvus7x
      @xCorvus7x 10 місяців тому +1

      @@milesandrews6711 They can circumscribe that though, e. g. say that a change is supposed to make the game more varied.
      When they speak of balancing who says that they don't mean their profits?

    • @milesandrews6711
      @milesandrews6711 10 місяців тому

      @@xCorvus7x if they were to argue that hitting diameter instead of circular was to make the game more varied noone would believe that shit
      Actually noone would buy it
      That's the problem, some of their hits are so ridiculous that the only reasonable way to justify them is "we want money"

  • @258thHiGuy
    @258thHiGuy 10 місяців тому +36

    The Drident unlimit scared me for 0.2 seconds until I remembered that Ratpier, Broadbull, _and_ Barrage are all still banned

    • @jimtsap04
      @jimtsap04 10 місяців тому +12

      Lowkey ratpier could go to 1 yesterday tho

    • @mikaela5938
      @mikaela5938 10 місяців тому +2

      Rat not being at 1 is really weird, having an Armageddon knight in that deck is fine

    • @RazielTheUnborn
      @RazielTheUnborn 10 місяців тому

      I feel if Fenrir can be at three, Ratpier can go to semi limited or unlimited.

    • @258thHiGuy
      @258thHiGuy 10 місяців тому

      @@RazielTheUnborn Fenrir is at 2

    • @zigzag321go
      @zigzag321go 10 місяців тому

      Rat could probably go to two and become a very good, but not a broken card.

  • @Blackopsspartn
    @Blackopsspartn 10 місяців тому +7

    Honestly I’m a bit surprised they didn’t put diameter to 2 first

  • @gubigubigubigubi
    @gubigubigubigubi 10 місяців тому +37

    Whats crazy to me is how they are just like
    Drident from 1 to 3 totally fine 0% chance this comes back to haunt us.
    Then they are like
    HMMMM Tempest to 2 just incase.
    Like wtf Tempest is a pack filler common card why are we being so careful with the dragonrulers 😂

    • @centurion2396
      @centurion2396 10 місяців тому +13

      PTSD from 2013 that never healed

    • @joshmountain9705
      @joshmountain9705 10 місяців тому +5

      Dragon link. That deck can and will abuse rulers if able.

    • @centurion2396
      @centurion2396 10 місяців тому +17

      @@joshmountain9705 i remember that when MBT did the unbaning 2/3rd of the banlist, quantal didn't bother putting any of the rulers, the bystials are just a strictly better option and apart from tidal and redox, the other 2 dragon rulers are trash by today's standard.
      Tidal is a foolish burial that needs you to open another water monster which won't happen in dragon link and redox is a reborn that needs you to open an earth.
      Playing the baby dragons doesn't let you use their secondary effect either since they need to discard.
      The rulers were a XYZ and beatstick strategy, they won't combo well with dragon link.
      Weirdly enough, they would combo amazingly with kashtira, all level 7 and arguably the best ruler, redox, is an earth that can banish fenrir and start combos.

    • @gubigubigubigubi
      @gubigubigubigubi 10 місяців тому +4

      @@joshmountain9705 dragon link is gonna dragon link with or without the rulers. if either need to be hit its just dragon link lol

    • @joshmountain9705
      @joshmountain9705 10 місяців тому

      @@centurion2396 makes sense. I remembered seeing them used in one of those tournaments too but checking now it was pre bystial. I think Konami's paranoia is rather founded though. The rulers are very clearly old design philosophy.

  • @pnak0tic
    @pnak0tic 10 місяців тому +5

    "We need to hit Mathmech, we should limit the metal robot with a red background, this will be a big hit"
    "Ok boss, consider it done"

  • @masterdon187
    @masterdon187 10 місяців тому +21

    As a fellow runick (sprite and naturia) enjoyer with a royal finish fountain, was waiting for this video all day

  • @TimothyGod
    @TimothyGod 10 місяців тому +6

    2:29 something important note about cynet mining being at two now, it is also a structure deck card, so people like myself who bought 3 decks, can't dust their third cynet mining, unless konami lets us. What a nice hit, thanks for wasting my gems

  • @jacobcoates7987
    @jacobcoates7987 10 місяців тому +7

    Woah dude dont joke about arianna at 1 thats the only real normal summon in the deck.

    • @SenHnk
      @SenHnk 10 місяців тому +10

      Or saying that a welcome trap should go to one, basically killing the whole grind game of the deck. Lab is actually pretty fragile to hits, that's why I'd rather see the trap floodgates gone.

    • @Robbbbinator
      @Robbbbinator 10 місяців тому

      They can hit the other lvl4 Ariane to 1, that would be fine.

    • @ccc2839
      @ccc2839 10 місяців тому

      the problem with Lab isnt Lab cards is the 3 D barier

  • @ObeliskTGS
    @ObeliskTGS 10 місяців тому +1

    "They miss clicked"
    Pretty much how I feel every time Sunseed Genius Loci isn't hit.

  • @-Knave
    @-Knave 10 місяців тому +25

    Konami refusing to acknowledge it's the floodgates that are the problem cards in Runicks for the 100th time.

    • @johnnycapote9817
      @johnnycapote9817 10 місяців тому +15

      No the field spell is the problem. U draw 3 on my turn and your turn goofy

    • @beenthroughnam3747
      @beenthroughnam3747 10 місяців тому +5

      bruh the runick cards themselves are the floodgates

    • @lucaslennan3356
      @lucaslennan3356 10 місяців тому +11

      Bro they're 15 Instant Fusions and a draw 3 on both turns, they're stupid.
      That said yeah ban all the floodgates.

    • @atrum613
      @atrum613 10 місяців тому +1

      I don't think you understand the definition of floodgate@@beenthroughnam3747

    • @phstingray205
      @phstingray205 10 місяців тому +5

      @@beenthroughnam3747literally lying lol

  • @TheKonjodan
    @TheKonjodan 10 місяців тому +3

    With salad getting these retrains of different cyberse cards. I am waiting patiently for "Fire Circular" or something like thaz

  • @jarom1144
    @jarom1144 10 місяців тому +5

    Super happy about the fountain hit. Nobody likes playing against runick or its variants. Its not fun watching your opponent shuffle their interruptions back, and draw 3. Likely new interruptions. Every turn. As a quick effect. And likely protected from destruction.

  • @cameronrobertson9800
    @cameronrobertson9800 10 місяців тому +2

    I don't play master duel so I'm not sure what the Mathmech lists look like there but Diameter in the TCG would actually be an impactful limit. If you don't want to get nibbed diameter + a name is the only consistent way to avoid it. In a format with 3 circular, it also means if alembertian gets negated laplacian won't get a negate when summoned with superfactorial. Personally I also perform this limit rather than what happened in the TCG. Mathmech players were saying since mystic fighters (and especially after ROTD) that the deck didn't have any starters, which was what was holding the deck back because the rest of the cards were already pretty good but you needed 2-3 cards to do anything

  • @nosparkss
    @nosparkss 10 місяців тому +5

    I loooooveee Mathmech

  • @technotenor0487
    @technotenor0487 10 місяців тому

    This might be an explanation but not a justification is such a good way to say it

  • @kuma9239
    @kuma9239 10 місяців тому +9

    Fountain to 1... The world is healing. Josh is still trying to justify drawing six.

  • @258thHiGuy
    @258thHiGuy 10 місяців тому +5

    Semi-limiting purrely cards hurts way more than semi-ing a different archetype because you can't ever reveal all 3 copies with my friend

  • @ramondewilde05
    @ramondewilde05 10 місяців тому +4

    Realisticly whats the issue w labyrth like outside of eev and barrier (which arent labs fault)
    I dont rlly see what the issue is like yh it can play or turn 0
    If u wanna make that less consistent semi limit or limit clock

  • @TheIncinerator12
    @TheIncinerator12 10 місяців тому +1

    once you realize they were hitting winrates and look at all the cards on the list, the list makes a lot more sense.

  • @raizen4597
    @raizen4597 10 місяців тому +1

    At least you didnt have to deal against 6 circular but only 5 😂.
    Love the thumbnail so much ngl.

  • @fuzzythoughts8020
    @fuzzythoughts8020 10 місяців тому +11

    Prediction: next pack includes dispater and labrynth butler

    • @dimas-yr8un
      @dimas-yr8un 10 місяців тому +1

      pretty sure someone in dkayed’s stream mentioned it would be mannadium but dunno where he got that leak tho

    • @xCorvus7x
      @xCorvus7x 10 місяців тому +2

      @@dimas-yr8un They've already keept as waiting quite a bit for the final wave of cards related to Albaz.

    • @dimas-yr8un
      @dimas-yr8un 10 місяців тому +1

      @@xCorvus7x yup it could be possible

  • @NightyKnight09
    @NightyKnight09 10 місяців тому +1

    If coder is right Stovie actually makes sense since a lot of people in lower ranks will surrender after a stovie activation so its win rate might be higher than big welcome so they hit that instead of

  • @domenoryx3466
    @domenoryx3466 10 місяців тому +1

    konami would be the kind of person whom would rather lose all their limbs than to make a proper banlist

  • @SuperSilver316
    @SuperSilver316 10 місяців тому +4

    No one gonna say anything about the Pokémon Colosseum OST

    • @theomnigamer9177
      @theomnigamer9177 10 місяців тому

      I was going to say Gale of Darkness since it’s in both, but yeah. Still great music.

  • @TheDocperian
    @TheDocperian 10 місяців тому

    I can't believe we have a rival for the May 2022 one that limited Conq and semi'd Analyzer, Cobalt Sparrow, Rocksies, Fraktal, Torn Scales, Fusion Destiny and Laolao for MD's absolute most out of touch banlist

  • @leodeleon3990
    @leodeleon3990 10 місяців тому +10

    rip

  • @DeathlyBioShock
    @DeathlyBioShock 10 місяців тому +1

    Based pokemon colosseum music

  • @Mr.Stitch
    @Mr.Stitch 10 місяців тому +3

    This whole banlist was like "hey guys, we made a banlist but didnt really feel like doing anything so we made some useless hits, also D-link is slightly worse"

  • @ApollousasBear
    @ApollousasBear 10 місяців тому

    2 Quick Launch and 2 Chaos Space. Stop Konami, my poor dragons are gonna starve :(

  • @gungnir382
    @gungnir382 10 місяців тому +1

    CIRCULAR WILL NEVER DIE!

  • @salexpie
    @salexpie 10 місяців тому +1

    Diameter hit actually does matter a lot imo, at least for the pure mathmech strategy. Significantly hurts the follow up which was one of the things I liked about it as a pure deck.

  • @KFC-Warrior
    @KFC-Warrior 10 місяців тому

    The exodia example was a great way of explaining the prior point.

  • @KFC-Warrior
    @KFC-Warrior 10 місяців тому +2

    I wouldn't pick on the cynet mining hit that much, end of the day its potentially going in the right direction on the banlist at least i.e. to one.

  • @vergillives9890
    @vergillives9890 10 місяців тому +1

    Pot of desires is always at 2 anyways

  • @YouHadBeenH2Owned
    @YouHadBeenH2Owned 10 місяців тому +1

    If they really didn't want to hit circular, banning diameter would at least remove the negate from superfactorial.

    • @armandonoriega681
      @armandonoriega681 10 місяців тому

      Pure Mathmech (that no one actually plays) need the omninegate, so a better hit would be Laplacian. The OTK Mathmech strategy (originally intended for the deck) doesn't rely on Laplacian, but cards like Circular and Diameter are essential.

    • @milesandrews6711
      @milesandrews6711 10 місяців тому

      ​@@armandonoriega681the OTK strategy is not the intended way to play Mathmech, who told you that?
      The deck was always meant to set up superfactorial to slow your opponent down with Laplacian and then follow up with the OTK
      Blind second dosent work because Mathmech doesn't have good board breaking tools(ironically other than Laplacian)

    • @armandonoriega681
      @armandonoriega681 10 місяців тому

      @@milesandrews6711 Of course it is, just read the effect of ALL the Mathmech cards, not only the cards that are currently used. You have to do the math so that you can win with a single attack of its real boss monster, Geomathmech Final Sigma. All Mathmech cards have effects that 1) modify the attack 2) change the number of attacks or 3) special summon, all what is needed to OTK.
      Laplacian and the trap are the option if you are forced to go first cause they give you disruption, or follow up if you summon Magma or Alembertian instead. The boardbreakers are obviously non engine, just like in any other deck (lightning storm, harpies feather duster, kaijus, forbidden droplett, red reboot), but even Magma and Laplacian could help for that.
      Link climbing is NOT what the deck is intended for. It has no link names and it needs the extra monster zone to apply the most important effects in the OTK calculation (unnaffected boss Final Sigma, double attack of multiplication, double number of attacks of Nabla, Half attack of division). And that is why Mathmech is the most unique cyberse deck; its strategy is based on Synchro and XYZ summon, not link climbing like any other cyberse deck.

  • @larrycapija3570
    @larrycapija3570 10 місяців тому +3

    I'm like 70% convinced that the banlist in md is generated bye an algoritm.

  • @ave4622
    @ave4622 10 місяців тому

    Stovie semi was such an amazing joke hit. It's hilariously ridiculous.
    I'm pretty sure everyone knows at this point that the banlist team are Lab players.

  • @Rikako_
    @Rikako_ 10 місяців тому +2

    glad MD doesn't take the boring approach even tho we know why they do this

  • @tommoex
    @tommoex 10 місяців тому +3

    They are definitely using win rate rate when played, they spammed the win rate of cards during worlds when played, but agreed yugioh does not work this way. I was also going to say Exodia shows this is bad logic if this is the case.

  • @akichan4168
    @akichan4168 10 місяців тому +1

    Next they will limit Superfactorial.

  • @MrBones-td6qn
    @MrBones-td6qn 10 місяців тому +4

    Konami needs to be forced to sit down with prominent community members and made to do interviews fully explaining their reasoning for all banlists.

  • @Rabidragon9241
    @Rabidragon9241 10 місяців тому +14

    RIP Fountain

    • @DonMarzzoni
      @DonMarzzoni 10 місяців тому +12

      Thank God rot in hell

    • @Rabidragon9241
      @Rabidragon9241 10 місяців тому +4

      @@DonMarzzoni nooooo

    • @VixYW
      @VixYW 10 місяців тому +6

      @@DonMarzzoni Say what you will about it, Runick was a great engine if you had it and wanted to save gems and crafting materials on events. It worked with almost anything, filling up spots for any missing cards that you wouldn't need to craft, and there's no good replacement for it in the game as of now. Maybe when we get the Horus engine, but that's so far off...
      Ah... I miss the pure Runick deck without any floodgates that was playable for... what, 2 months before they hit the good quick play spells? It was such a fun do or die deck.

    • @vergillives9890
      @vergillives9890 10 місяців тому

      Fountain is fine safe in the packaging

    • @ShonenGoon
      @ShonenGoon 10 місяців тому

      ​@@VixYW Konami is stupid af for hitting runick again

  • @kenja0685
    @kenja0685 10 місяців тому +1

    They hit Stovie because they want less targets that can be bounced by Big Welcome, and they wanted less Turn 1 set up to exist. I think Chandraglier should have also taken a hit to lower the consistency further, but they're probably waiting for the final wave of support in Butler.

  • @ducky36F
    @ducky36F 10 місяців тому +3

    Master duel loves their semi-limits huh? 😂

  • @colossaldonut5190
    @colossaldonut5190 10 місяців тому

    Cynet Mining semi-limit is 5-head. Most people got that card from the Salamangreat Structure Deck so they can't dismantle it.

  • @davescott4473
    @davescott4473 10 місяців тому +1

    This was on purpose just to make Josh angry

  • @reirei_tk
    @reirei_tk 10 місяців тому +23

    MATHMECH BEST DECK LET'S GOOOOOOOOO

  • @StrangeSynergy
    @StrangeSynergy 10 місяців тому

    They took out my boy... My beautiful boy diameter... He didnt event do anything wrong...

  • @Chackothewacko
    @Chackothewacko 10 місяців тому

    Hand trapping the rank 4 and if they had raw diameter you stopped nothing. This diameter to one helped with those scenarios

  • @alphu5
    @alphu5 10 місяців тому

    ohno not my 1 copy of Diameter 😢

  • @shaedeymamlas5496
    @shaedeymamlas5496 10 місяців тому

    Next banlist, sigma to 2, superfactorial to 2

  • @Flomdcho
    @Flomdcho 10 місяців тому

    Konami will keep hitting consistency instead of ceiling for a few reasons
    It continues the power creep that forces people to either play daily for gems or buy gems to get new decks that keep up
    It gives bad players a chance to beat good players simply because of hand draw RNG
    And
    It creates a dopamine loop with people chasing the high of a blowout win rather than boring repetitive games

  • @aquaenjoyer1612
    @aquaenjoyer1612 10 місяців тому +1

    maaaaan i was starting to enjoy fur hire runick spright Sadge

  • @Solemn-boost
    @Solemn-boost 10 місяців тому +4

    Me when the click misses

  • @emperorshun4750
    @emperorshun4750 10 місяців тому

    Cant wait to see his reaction to the Toy cards that search Circular :)

  • @Leonardo.ohime.i
    @Leonardo.ohime.i 10 місяців тому +1

    thye greedclicked

  • @nigamnation
    @nigamnation 10 місяців тому +2

    Miss clicked? What about mr clicked?

  • @daedalus5253
    @daedalus5253 10 місяців тому

    25:33 Joshua Schmidt: „Wir schaffen das“

  • @gepapa3633
    @gepapa3633 10 місяців тому +4

    you are undervaluing the diameter hit quite a bit. While it isn't the most impactful hit it still hurt pure mathmech quite a bit since it removes their best turn 3 follow-up/top deck and it makes the deck more susceptible to d.d. crow or the bystials since now you can snipe it at the end phase to remove the omni negate.
    That being said this is a pretty bad limit that only hurts pure mathmech while not affecting it's most unfair aspect which is its turn 1. And worst of all there was such a perfect hit they could have done which didn't involve limiting circular, that being banning Sigma.
    This mostly kills mathmech use as an engine in other cyberse decks, it stops it from being a 1 card combo, it leaves Mathmech at a better place than it was pre-circular and it's an SR so Konami avoids giving out UR points.

  • @TheTaintedWisdom
    @TheTaintedWisdom 10 місяців тому +3

    10:49 - Restricting the maid over Stovie would've been one of the WORST hits to Labrynth if you wanted to limit its power. Stovie works going 1st OR 2nd, despite not being able to get monsters can still get the Field Spell if need be, summons itself, can be used to summon Chaos Angel, can still trigger its effect once on the field, *AND* triggers the recovery effect of Cooclock! Meanwhile, Arianna can search Lady, Draw a card, and summon a monster... but won't be able to search if your opponent has Ash... or Imperm... or Veiler... or Droll if you used Extrav/Prosperity 1st. You know? Only SOME OF THE MOST UBIQUITOUS HAND TRAPS IN THE ENTIRE MOTHERFUCKING GAME???
    12:18 - I barely see Runick *PERIOD!!!* It's total bullshit!!!
    Konami Employee 1: "Hey, Kashtira is literally everywhere and has no bans despite having cards banned in *BOTH* formats, has the single most powerful form of removal in the game, can lock down your zones, has a walking Macro summonable from the Extra Deck that gets back materials for its most powerful effect by just playing the game, and can recover literally any monster as long as your opponent isn't ALSO playing it, should we do something about it?"
    KE2: "NAH! In fact, why don't we shit on some other decks that haven't seen any play whatsoever?"
    KE1: "JUST AS LONG AS WE DON'T BAN SPRIGHT ELF! OKAY?!? WE CAN'T MAKE SENSE BY BANNING A CARD SO CLEARLY BROKEN WE NEEDED TO BAN IT IN BOTH FORMATS! I'M FUCKING SERIOUS!!! WE *CAN'T* MAKE *ANY* SENSE!!!!!"
    KE2: "I know, this is literally the 31,044,013th time you and every other person here has said that, we all know the rules. But I was thinking we shit on something *_other_* than Spright this time? Since we basically have "Runick but better in literally every" way in Purrely, (nice job on making it even more insufferable by making them cats by the way) I was thinking we could take a massive shit on Runick and give a light tap on the wrist to Purrely just to rub AIDs infected blood in the wound?"
    KE1: "That's stupid, nonsensical, and cruel. I fucking love it! Meet you at 5 for the usual puppy torture murder sesh?"
    KE2: "You know it buddy! Oooh, make sure you put in a good word with the boss during your meeting on Thursday, I really want to get on Satan's good side."
    13:01 - I thought this was Circular for the longest time (i.e. until I was writing this comment just now) because I have more than 2 brain cells and didn't allocate the focus and brain power necessary to look more closely at something that *MUST* have been Circular. And here I thought I was being comedically hyperbolic with the above bit...

    • @ayham613
      @ayham613 10 місяців тому

      I’m a labrynth player and I will tell you hitting arianna would’ve been worse
      Cause yeah stovie summons itself
      But arianna literally searches anything so if you open arianna 1st turn is always better than opening stovie
      and yeah hitting stovie kind of make it more rare to full combo turn 0 but overall not very big of a deal

  • @armandonoriega681
    @armandonoriega681 10 місяців тому

    Imagine to draw the two Purrelys 🥴 even drawing one of them limits the plays. Maybe we should start looking at cards like Monster Reborn or Kinka-Byo to have more excavations with Purrely.

  • @vergillives9890
    @vergillives9890 10 місяців тому

    Dragon link rarely uses quick launch when bysteels exist

  • @azharzhya1305
    @azharzhya1305 10 місяців тому

    Not bad for filling the banlist.
    Some cards are released to increase the power of some decks and reduce the consistency of some decks as well.
    Even so, it's still funny because there are worse cards to ban but they choose cards with a lower ratity which obviously don't have much impact in the deck itself, but it's a different story if they ban the worse cards.
    This reminds me of when the "tearlament" cards were released.

  • @doorto6152
    @doorto6152 10 місяців тому +1

    I think the diameter hit makes alembershen a chokepoint for the superfactorial line?

    • @armandonoriega681
      @armandonoriega681 10 місяців тому

      Still they cand send it to the graveyard with Terahertz

    • @brandongriffin6154
      @brandongriffin6154 10 місяців тому

      ​@armandonoriega681 less it get banish before hand. Worse case they won't get the neglect

    • @doorto6152
      @doorto6152 10 місяців тому

      @@armandonoriega681 hmm, yeah that’s a possibility. So it’s still 1-for-1 for one card for one less negate (no microcoder or fusion monster spell negate)

  • @D4PPZ456
    @D4PPZ456 10 місяців тому +14

    I feel like they should start unlimiting the Adventure cards. They aren't making anything broken at full power but they will allow rogue decks to have a chance.

    • @1stCallipostle
      @1stCallipostle 10 місяців тому +1

      I'm gonna be real dawg, I still dont know what the hell they do

    • @jimtsap04
      @jimtsap04 10 місяців тому +5

      ​@@1stCallipostlethey basically just make a token, a level 7 that can omni negate, and an equip spell that can bounce things at the cost of not using effects on normal summoned monsters

    • @1stCallipostle
      @1stCallipostle 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@jimtsap04When reading them some time ago, i caught literally none of that.
      So good to know

    • @thyme3972
      @thyme3972 10 місяців тому

      Adventure Tenyi immediately becomes something to think about at that point.
      Tomahawk is legal, auroradon is legal, and so is denglong. No halq hurts, sure, but you gotta remember that Kashtira cards pretty much make getting 7’s on the field really easy.

    • @ccc2839
      @ccc2839 10 місяців тому

      adventurer tenyi is so much worse than just playing swordsoul since halq banned@@thyme3972

  • @SuperMophie
    @SuperMophie 10 місяців тому

    I don't know, I feel like they didn't

  • @flappy7305
    @flappy7305 10 місяців тому

    I love the background sound of the game pokemon xd in your videos

  • @KixMusaid
    @KixMusaid 10 місяців тому

    Hear me out.. now stay with me.. ban Maxx C..

  • @ThienNguyen-lk6xd
    @ThienNguyen-lk6xd 10 місяців тому

    Fountain at 1, be grateful that they didn't do that 10 months ago coward free win

  • @jps_user20
    @jps_user20 10 місяців тому

    People had been talking on the MD subreddit to BAN diameter to make mathmech lose 1 negate. But instead they just limited it, wtf

  • @brutalnobody5240
    @brutalnobody5240 10 місяців тому

    Banlists are forgivable along as we get monthly banlist

  • @xenonim
    @xenonim 10 місяців тому

    If konami MD don want to hit circular. The card there must hit will be sigma to 1 copy, because sigma is main combo pieces. Banning sigma will automatically make circular from being 1 card combo to 2 card mathmech combo, and completely kill superfactorial combo from XYZ laplacian.

  • @shakeweller
    @shakeweller 10 місяців тому +1

    Both welcome traps should have gone to 1. Circular to 1. And Chaos Ruler needs to go

    • @kbthegoatw
      @kbthegoatw 10 місяців тому

      Bro just want Lab to be unplayable ☠️

  • @minhkhangtran6948
    @minhkhangtran6948 10 місяців тому

    >A well-balanced game attract more player.
    >Yugioh
    Well there's your problem

  • @verbalengine95
    @verbalengine95 10 місяців тому +2

    Having a second copy of diameter is really good for follow up so it does hurt their grind game a lot

  • @Ragnarok540
    @Ragnarok540 10 місяців тому

    The MD banlist has a clear objective: Make decks bricky, and therefore give even the worst decks wins sometimes because they bricked less than the opponent.

  • @chocolatepotato5469
    @chocolatepotato5469 10 місяців тому

    I think the banlists in masterduel are generated by AI that reads the success rates of cards. then the devs alter it slightly to not remove staples that are just good not too broken.
    Next banlist they will ban diameter....

  • @bruskydu
    @bruskydu 10 місяців тому

    They finally free Tri-Brigade after almost 2' years

  • @devonsmith621
    @devonsmith621 10 місяців тому

    the guy how makes the ban list is a labrynth player obv

  • @arrownoir
    @arrownoir 4 місяці тому

    Should’ve banned fountain. It’s still being abused by decks.

  • @simonius01
    @simonius01 10 місяців тому

    What be a better hit to mathmech other than limiting Dia or Circular? I don't see a hit that would do just little more

  • @thepinms
    @thepinms 10 місяців тому +3

    Ban all pots!

    • @CrisisCore62
      @CrisisCore62 10 місяців тому

      Really?

    • @Xero-rr2ol
      @Xero-rr2ol 10 місяців тому

      Yes.@@CrisisCore62

    • @CrisisCore62
      @CrisisCore62 10 місяців тому

      @@Xero-rr2ol pot of bénévolence, pot générosity, pot of aquisiti, pot of riches, pot of dichotomy 😂

  • @VillyIsThatYou
    @VillyIsThatYou 10 місяців тому

    I'm new to Master Duel and Purrely is my first deck so I'm happy to see the hits are pretty minor, I expected Sleepy to be hit but I understand now that they don't like to hit UR's so I guess the draw 6 combo still survives! Hope Epurrely Noir comes out soon!

  • @NemesisUmbral
    @NemesisUmbral 10 місяців тому

    Considering the explanation for the bans especially Fountain and Diameter, is it really the case that the ones behind the banlist actually play the game? Or is there this mythical “Konami Quota” that is looming over them on what to hit or slap on the wrist? Hence the avoidance of URs getting hit.

  • @Malister23
    @Malister23 10 місяців тому

    Lab doesnt need any hits in a bo1 format,maybe the clock to 1 but besides that the archetype is okay to exist.The floodgates the deck plays though can go and rot on the banlist forever.Also ban circular mathmech decks are literally one boring combo nothing else

  • @SamuraiXKdubs
    @SamuraiXKdubs 10 місяців тому

    Mathmech used to be rogue in MD, did Mathmech even top in the Duelist cup?

  • @renaldyhaen
    @renaldyhaen 10 місяців тому

    Paper player always forget this game have monthly banlist. Unlike the paper when you can only get a banlist 4-6 months once. Suddenly make a deck weak is a bad way to "balance" the deck in Master Duel. Because we all know next month, the dev will drop 1-2 new banlist to weakens some decks again.
    .
    Maybe we can keep it "fresh" if Konami can release a new impactful deck every months too. But because we usually get an impactful deck in 3-4 months. I think the dev want to slowly changes the META until the new impactful decks released.
    .
    Skill Drain and Gozen already limit. I think it is fair for a non-searchable cards in limited list. Personally I like to hit Hugin (limit) to balance all variant. Limit Hugin mean less access to the field spell (and multiple draws), less consistent Non-OPT backrow (floodgates) protection, and less extender or opening for combo variant. Fountain limit will make the pure version fragile. This don't really impactful for combo version, because the Fountain in combo variant usually just become "cherry on top" after they make a good board, and they can still play if the Fountain banished or gone.

  • @isaiahshepard289
    @isaiahshepard289 10 місяців тому

    Yes hit stovie
    Like chandraglier doesn't exist accomplishing the same exact thing...
    Ashed my Arianna, Araine, Welcome and Big welcome
    Banish lady and lovely
    But Stovie reborn pitch the nothing in my hand
    Whoa too far
    That choas angel you banished off of extrav might come up