Rebuilding a Resilient, Inclusive Christ Church Cathedral in New Zealand

On Feb. 22, 2011, a shallow, intense, 6.3-magnitude earthquake struck Christchurch, New Zealand, near the city’s business center district, causing widespread damage and claiming 185 lives. The damage to the city’s buildings and infrastructure was severe, as these structures were already weakened from a 7.1 magnitude earthquake that occurred just five months earlier on Sept. 4, 2010.
Multiple buildings collapsed, roads were cracked, and water mains burst. Christ Church Cathedral-situated in front of Cathedral Square and considered to be the center and heart of the city-suffered extensive damage, to the point where no one could enter it. The cathedral and the square are very important to the people of Christchurch, including the local indigenous Tangata Whenua and Iwi.
But before the earthquake, there wasn’t much of an indigenous presence in the square, so when international architecture and design practice Warren and Mahoney began work on the project, the firm formed a partnership with residents of Christchurch and the area’s indigenous locals, retaining historical elements of the cathedral while rebuilding the square to be more inclusive. Watch the video to learn how Warren and Mahoney succeeded in rebuilding more sustainably, resiliently, and inclusively.
For more great content like this, visit www.autodesk.com/design-make.

[@djilalikraroubi1953]

Hello, I want to ask you regarding the Autodesk Robot program. I am an Algerian university student and this year I am preparing a project for the end of the annual course (Master 2). To submit my project, I must use your program Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis, and I do not have the money to buy it. Would you allow me to take it from the sites? Pirated so I can finish my studies, which will last for 7 months at most? I hope you take my message into consideration and respond to me as soon as possible. Thank you.

[@MicrosoftCircuits]

These guys forgot about the DDOS attack like srsly😂😂

[@rodneypantony3551]

Would Autodesk kindly confirm Rome's port, 200 A.D., was about 40 metres above today's sea levels and incorporate fluctuations in sea levels in all port city construction. You can physically inspect Rome's old port and inspect with ground penetrating radar. Could Scotland's Adrok kindly verify that Rome's port, 200 AD, was about 40 meters higher than today's sea levels?
Background: The natural rhythm for sea levels is about 40 meters +/- over millennia, and of course much greater over tens of thousands of years. Civilizations built on ports end when their ports are high and dry or submerged. Obviously tax payers don't pay for ports designed for such large fluctuations in sea levels. If you check out Troy, and other old ports, it's the same damn thing? I'm writing to Adrok because Scotland always had to be smarter than England in order to survive. Ukraine's new ports need to be designed for fluctuations in sea levels.
We know from old photographs, Icefields Parkway, Canadian Rockies, that massive global warming, measured in centuries, was going on before industrialization, and it's still going on which suggests we'll reach the high water mark, sea levels 40 meters higher than today. Obvious questions are when and how to replace our ports.