China-Russia relations: "Limitless friendship" but not unconditional alliances?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
  • China and Russia hailed their friendship as “without limits” but is the relationship also unconditional? CNA’s East Asia Tonight dive deep into the challenges facing the China-Russia partnership.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 129

  • @karayursa
    @karayursa 14 днів тому +13

    CNA more like CIA

    • @kennyng2289
      @kennyng2289 11 днів тому

      US Congress allocated $500 million to media to spread propaganda on China. CNA is a media.

  • @secretfountainofyouth9765
    @secretfountainofyouth9765 14 днів тому +11

    Did you noticed both Russian Central Bank and Finance Minister are in China? This is not a typical visit among head of state.

  • @minervasheryl4748
    @minervasheryl4748 15 днів тому +14

    "Limitless friendship" but not unconditional alliance. Sounds exactly like how new PM Lawrence Wong just described Singapore's relationship with both the US and China.

    • @LonganLee
      @LonganLee 15 днів тому

      There is nothing limitless. It's just a flowery way of speaking. Language is a promiscuous bitch

    • @who52au
      @who52au 15 днів тому +5

      BS Singaporean will drop their " pants " if the email came from Washington !

    • @LonganLee
      @LonganLee 15 днів тому +1

      @@who52au SG self-interest is related to relying on USA military munitions for defence?

  • @jrkr7357
    @jrkr7357 15 днів тому +12

    Today, the grapes Modi has eaten all tasted SOUR,
    and Modi no happy

  • @waynegore5291
    @waynegore5291 15 днів тому +12

    Ally is the anglo-saxon concept meanning gangsters.
    Paterner is friendship and win-win.

  • @bobafett5757
    @bobafett5757 14 днів тому +3

    *Limitless friendship means no limit relatonship and that sum up to unconditonal alliance that means they both have each other back through good and bad times so dont mince what its meant to be*

  • @bobafett5757
    @bobafett5757 14 днів тому +7

    *Salute both Russia and China for showing their big balls to the whimsical multibipolar Western world*

  • @resnica3557
    @resnica3557 15 днів тому +13

    Is CNA convinced that anyone other than the anchors paid by the CNA does NOT speak English at all? "Limitless", "unconditional", "friendship", and "alliances"? Why not also incorporate "ostentatious" and "pompous," as well as "stupidity" and "idiocy" in your title and your narratives? By the way, there is this thing called "thesaurus."

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 13 днів тому

      the title is actually brilliant in describing how China see the relation. China knows history, it knows the that world wars started because countries were forming alliances and becoming blocs. thus it does not seek alliances. this is the reason why Singapore cannot fullying side with China, because China will not protect anyone, alliances is liabilities can China does not wish to be involved in the liabilities of other countries. Russia is a key partner for Russia and there is no limited to "cooperation" with Russia. if all 4 word are the same, why would we need 4 word? it just a question of if you are smart enough to understand the difference.

  • @johnny-ih5es
    @johnny-ih5es 15 днів тому +13

    Speculations and more speculations by the experts. There's no concrete evidence.

  • @PutraMing
    @PutraMing 15 днів тому +30

    CIA covert operation with Singlish news propaganda channel 😂😂😂

    • @ssrae-2229
      @ssrae-2229 9 днів тому

      Singapore is pro-US led wests, opposed to China because of Geopolitical and Economic RIVALRY Period:

  • @factstruths8387
    @factstruths8387 15 днів тому +21

    That s your opinion. No need to boast about allies etc like gangsters.

  • @simonwei1131
    @simonwei1131 15 днів тому +20

    The joint cooperation between China and Russia has a positive effect from the perspective of the world situation. It balances world power. It plays a balancing role to achieve world peace and avoid greater wars.

    • @gf5617
      @gf5617 14 днів тому

      so you speak your mind, do they in Russia or China???☠

  • @playerish
    @playerish 14 днів тому +2

    The West always have concern about Chn Rus here and there. When would they have no concerns?

  • @kene4478
    @kene4478 15 днів тому +2

    In Bahasa , we call it
    TTM "Teman tapi Mesra"

  • @rian4104
    @rian4104 15 днів тому +2

    No need for formal defense alliance. The national security interest of both country won't allow either country to be destroyed by the West. In other word they will not stay neutral if either country face existential threat because it will also put their own security at risk. History shows how China interfere in Korea and Vietnam war against Western power. This non formal alliance will stay for at least couple of decades because both the West and Russia already close the door for reconciliation. This non formal alliance will only weaken if the US allow Russia back into Europe family. But it will never happen, because strong and united Europe means US lost its influence, it is also the reason for the Ukraine war.

  • @vincecarlo
    @vincecarlo 15 днів тому +8

    The Enemy of My Enemy is DEFINITELY My Friend

    • @LonganLee
      @LonganLee 15 днів тому

      Just that there is no definite but only self-interest. Never say never. SG also can be united with JB as a federation, theoretically speaking

  • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
    @kaimingraymondchoi9909 14 днів тому +1

    Thanks to United States. China and Russia resources in terms of food, minerals, technogy, human power, market, security threat from other nations etc. are extremely complimentary to each other. The list is endles. When these two countries work close together, It will easily add another 1.5% to 2% to both countries GPD. For example, China could easily mobilize several millions people to Russia to turning unused land into something valuable. Another important element to this cooperation is that many other nations shall have greater confidence to join and cooperate with these two world powers. United States contribution to this cooperation is immense. Thanks to Biden. Without the Biden administration this cooperation could not possibily come to fruition so quickly.

  • @daffyduck4195
    @daffyduck4195 11 днів тому

    The Brookings Institute said the China-Russian relationship documents do not state "unlimited" or "without limits" but were Western media terms.

  • @johnny-ih5es
    @johnny-ih5es 15 днів тому +4

    During the Mao's era, the two countries had signed mutual friendship treaties and the Soviets had transferred technologies and assisted in China's development.
    Beijing remains committed to the treaties.

  • @SeaJay_Oceans
    @SeaJay_Oceans 13 днів тому

    Our thoughts and prayers go out to the Jinping family... such a sudden and unexpected loss.
    Betrayed by those he trusted. Very sad ! 😞

  • @LonganLee
    @LonganLee 15 днів тому +4

    What is Limitless friendship? Its in english thats for sure. Is it absolutely Limitless? Nothing is. Language is spoken in many context , as metaphor, figuratively, literally or tongue-in-cheek or lying.

    • @thefourthrabbit9516
      @thefourthrabbit9516 15 днів тому

      In Chinese it is "无上限“, which means there is no upper limit. However, it says nothing about a lower limit. Obviously, the Chinese can keep the level of military cooperation pretty low so as not to provoke the West too much.

  • @jejalam2
    @jejalam2 15 днів тому +1

    兄弟 - if you can't see thru!

  • @vulgarisopinio
    @vulgarisopinio 14 днів тому

    The Oxford university “expert “ should have known that Russia is the 4th and not 16th trading partner.

  • @ptaeiy
    @ptaeiy 14 днів тому

    Can't wait for China to launch the USA Cultural Year in China.

  • @user-vj4sn1hk3n
    @user-vj4sn1hk3n 15 днів тому +1

    Absolutely

  • @ericteng7725
    @ericteng7725 15 днів тому +5

    Why pour cold water on a hot topic?

  • @hamkaling4458
    @hamkaling4458 15 днів тому

    U young ..read more bout history. During US onslaught in Korean war trying to install puppet regime in Korea, Russia as Soviet Union cannot do much because their economy etc weak. And so Russia couldn't help Korea, so then China help Korea. But US was almighty...
    Not sure now

    • @icu17siberia
      @icu17siberia 14 днів тому

      actually, Russians flew Migs in defense on North Korea. Give them some credit

  • @Yuegang23Zhang-wk6xx
    @Yuegang23Zhang-wk6xx 12 днів тому

    Chian want keep nuetral between Russia and Ukrain. China has no crital nor praise about Russia.

  • @onexoxtoo
    @onexoxtoo 15 днів тому +3

    Limitless friendship cause China had given 910,000 sq km of land to Russia. Lol. Ultimate sohai China.

    • @krollpeter
      @krollpeter 14 днів тому

      yea that one I also don't understand. The secrets of friendship, or so.

    • @krollpeter
      @krollpeter 14 днів тому

      They run after a small island that actually never belonged to them. But that vast chunk of land of the size of Germany and France combined ... really, no?

  • @ryanwalters6184
    @ryanwalters6184 15 днів тому +2

    The tail is wagging the dog in this relationship.

  • @PutraMing
    @PutraMing 15 днів тому +10

    CIA propaganda channel 😂😂😂

  • @safe4862
    @safe4862 15 днів тому +3

    US pushed these two countries together

  • @markmilan57
    @markmilan57 13 днів тому

    With the arrival of Russian friendly hand toward China will definitely calm the trouble water and it would definitely boosts the Singaporean economy as well.

  • @stevehoe5017
    @stevehoe5017 15 днів тому

    The China as biggest manufacturing country needing huge supplies of fossil fuel & gases energy n rich source of materials which Russia have plentiful making the relationship interdependent n complimentary. Both China's and Russia leadership wisely choosing to cooperate together for mutual gains.

    • @icu17siberia
      @icu17siberia 14 днів тому

      I thought china was pushing "green technology"

  • @anthonysmith7913
    @anthonysmith7913 15 днів тому

    C’mon, stop envying 😂it’s not funny anymore

  • @PerriBelcourt
    @PerriBelcourt 15 днів тому +2

    Russia North Korea Iran

  • @hairypancake4425
    @hairypancake4425 14 днів тому

    Cope

  • @nickpope8056
    @nickpope8056 14 днів тому +1

    🇨🇳🇷🇺👍👍👍

  • @LonganLee
    @LonganLee 15 днів тому +6

    Russia proved what a "Democracy" can be. And that every country can be a different democracy. So a lousy democracy is not fault of the concept of democracy but the implementation by each country.
    China can also claim to be a democracy or even allow voting. The result can also be effectively the same, a One Party Rule.
    All this is possible because there is no single Democracy. Its as varied as the number of countries that exist.
    Language is such that white can be said to be a form of black and vice versa

    • @ericteng7725
      @ericteng7725 15 днів тому

      Yes, and the collective west harps on their version of democracy. They present their "Western democracy"as the gospel truth. In fact, going forward,their democracy will be the damnation of the human race!

    • @ericteng7725
      @ericteng7725 15 днів тому +1

      True!! Well said. And the collective west, just arrogantly harps on their version of democracy. Western democracy as they call it. They praise it and swear by it like it's the gospel truth. In fact, going forward, this "Western democracy " will be the damnation of the human race.

    • @normantan7796
      @normantan7796 15 днів тому

      Why China got the unwanted one part rule? It's because the other party run to Taiwan and refused to return to the mainland and now have an idea to go independent which the other party in China won't allowed. They got no cofident of winning if they return to the mainland but at the very least TRY and return to fight another day. The runaway will forever be runaway cowards afraid of getting kill. But Mainland China party already changed, they wanted re unification and not killing the other party if they return to offer as another party to the one party in China.

    • @lawrencepak1917
      @lawrencepak1917 15 днів тому +1

      Agreed totally. The Western version of democracy is bloodied in wars, crime, genocide, etc. We need a new version of democracy, one that is defined by China based on mutual respect and mutual benefit.

    • @LonganLee
      @LonganLee 15 днів тому

      @@lawrencepak1917 Democracy is not defined properly that's the point. Every country is different so, if every country adopt a different version of democracy, it won't work also. For all countries to adopt a one china policy it won't work also.

  • @nextlastChang
    @nextlastChang 15 днів тому +5

    We hold Chinese 🇨🇳 Xi Jinping accountable for damages caused by the Russian invasion
    because of his *"no limits"* support for Putin.

    • @Lucky-kb4hd
      @Lucky-kb4hd 15 днів тому

      滚远点,有你什么事儿

    • @EasternKalogeros
      @EasternKalogeros 15 днів тому +2

      Same old BOT from the same old bot farm with same old BS

    • @nicholasfooong.
      @nicholasfooong. 15 днів тому +1

      ​@@EasternKalogeroswhen chang comments, the ci na ba bi are on suicide watch 😂

    • @EasternKalogeros
      @EasternKalogeros 14 днів тому

      @nicholasfooong. darling.... gracious me, try harder next time. To be a comedian, you will still need some training......

  • @saimaqadir935
    @saimaqadir935 13 днів тому

    Mr putin all muslim world with you good luck

  • @Kilimanjaro5896
    @Kilimanjaro5896 15 днів тому +1

    Xi should claim back the territories lost to Russia first of all. Then and only then will friendship be limitless 😂😂😂.

    • @icu17siberia
      @icu17siberia 14 днів тому

      he'll get around to it...bear trap

  • @ArabicReja973
    @ArabicReja973 15 днів тому +3

    The consequence of a Russian win in this invasion is too great.
    - Russia 🇷🇺 can not win. Neither can China!

    • @who52au
      @who52au 15 днів тому

      Suck it up then !

    • @EasternKalogeros
      @EasternKalogeros 15 днів тому +1

      Bot bot bot ..bs..bs..bs

    • @MrNeversweat
      @MrNeversweat 15 днів тому

      The Russians or president Putin have different definitions on winning this war, they don't have the appetite to destroy and occupy kiev, a win for them is a Ukraine that is disarmed and got nothing to do with NATO to guarantee Russia's peace and security

  • @chrisck3405
    @chrisck3405 15 днів тому

    Oxford the underwear ?

  • @TomJerry-qv5eh
    @TomJerry-qv5eh 14 днів тому

    USA and their sanctions 😂😂 ❤ CCP ❤RUSSIA ❤IRAN ❤N.KOREA ❤PAKISTAN