Red dead 2, elder scrolls 3-5, MW2&3, The force unleashed 2, Ac2-Black flag, the Witcher 3, The walking dead season game 2&4, fallout 3,4, new Vegas, plenty of great sequels
Its because chess focused on adding new modes instead of sequels. I think 5d chess is its first sequel and while i think its really good its a sequel to chess in the same way oceans 8 is to oceans 13, as in it was a good thing but i think putting it in the same universe as its predecessors did more harm than good.
I've never understood the mentality that game publishers/developer's have with firing a load of your staff that worked on the first game for example and then bringing in new ones for the sequels, well I know the real reason why ... money but, Having an unstoppable team of workers that work around each other is where passion thrives in my opinion and in turn create great sequels and goals.
Old guys are annoying and want raises and benefits and hours. New guys are fresh outta college and desperate for a buck to pay off loans, way cheaper and easier to manipulate and abuse.
@@boygenius538_8 100% agree, dont worry , I knew the answer to it tbh because like I said money , cheaper to employ part time workers than keep someone that will want a raise after a few years. Unfortunately it happens in all industries
The old bioware team especially writers were quite good... I mean whoever was the creative genius behind star wars old republic stuff and jade empire and dragon age 1 and mass effect... Man bioware team was hot back then shooting out ips
Its an strategy used by companies and comporations, not only in the games industry but in every branch. They will always refresh the people who works inside
The funny thing is that from a technical standpoint keeping the original devs is potentially many times more profitable, but because it requires a bit more down payment, (as in they pay in the short term a bit more) they stupidly shoot themselves in the foot and go under, its a bit ironic when we know as well that one or two failed games isn't gonna tank those studios, its interesting that the smaller and less successful studios are more likely to keep old blood. Also part of the point of AAA publishers was suppose to be to compensate for flops without guaranteeing the company went under.
@@Peanut83176 He asked when a DLC can be considered an expansion. Expansions back in the days (grandpa mode on) lasted at least that much. Otherwise they were considered as simple add-ons
I’m surprised you didn’t mention Devil May Cry. That’s a rocky sequel history. 1 was… different. 2 was a dumpster fire. 3 was godlike. 4 was controversial. And 5 was a beautiful return to form. Oh. And I guess DMC was… okay…
Angels in Bible 1: "prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrpupupupprprrrrrrrrprprprprrprprprprprp" Angels in Bible 2: " I am the servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the Flame of Anor… The dark fire will not avail you! Flame of Udûn!"
@@hudsondunn8385 There's this recent meme about the actual biblical representation of angels. They're not the romanticized version of a Serafín, but odd looking amorph amalgams of wheels and eyes, and we all know that now because of a meme.
@@thetrashmann8140 the gameplay is amazing too. Exploring the mojave is a great time. Bonding with companions is a great time. Finding unique solutiond to quests based on you characters skillset is wonderful.
Honestly, bioshock 2 is probably one of my favorite games of all time, I liked the 1st one and most people I think hold that one in higher regards, but idk something about the 2nd for me had this irreplaceable sadness and vibe. Beat the whole game only using the drill on one play through lmao.
I’m so glad someone agrees Bioshock 2 is absolutely fantastic! The whole idea of playing as a Big Daddy, the storyline that is so closely connected to the characters- including the main character… honestly amazing.
I played 1 and then infinite. I enjoyed all of bioshock 1, but didn't really like the shield system in infinite. You could just go run and gun in bioshock 1, but then in infinite you're just hiding behind cover the entire game waiting for your shield to regenerate.
@@boygenius538_8 It is a different universe though, they rebuild the lore every time. Most amount of final fantasy sequels is FF13 having 3 games altogether.
The best though :Assassins Creed or Ubisoft games in General. They all follow the open world generic formula and AC series hasn't changed barely since AC III
@@Speer788 AC now is nothing like AC was years ago. It is much more open world RPG than stealth assassination game these days and has been this way since Origins.
@@venge1894 I will says just like Revelations (4th game at the time), Valhalla is the 3rd game with this new style and it's already stale imo. Either that or it's just boring on it's own making is AC3 levels of boredom lol AC3 imo was so bad I skipped Rogue and Black Flag only to return with Unity. Origins made AC to feel fresh again for me, then Odyssey surprisingly surpassed it for me, but Vahalla is full stop Ubisoft formula...time for revamp..not 4 more games using this basic Ubi engine
Most bullshit thing I’ve ever played or seen. Im able to turn my brain off and enjoy something, but when you pretend your deep and you just aren’t it does not work at all. If “train go boom” was all it was it’d be way better.
"Change is hard to sell" Resident evil 3 remake as of recent comes to mind. It was not as well received as the second game because they straight up removed some portions of the game in order to speed up development whereas the second game had more time to be fully cooked. WoW's cataclysm expansion was not well received by majority of the player base because it took away some portion of its identity away from the players. What was a game that you grew up playing for a few years is no more and instead you have something else in place. Runescape going into evolution of combat had the same reaction from the players as well. Half the player base had quit basically over night. Look at how well iphones sell every year. It's more proof that people want the same old item with as small change here and there. The overall product has to remind them of the one they are giving up for the new one. People, as a whole, do not like change in general. If something is completely different to the point where you no longer recognize it, it's a total turn off and the consumer is not going to be interested in learning the new product and buying it. This whole push for constant change in video games, is the result of reviewer critique. If a game is not changed all that much, the reviewers point it out and the developers take that feed back and try and reinvent the wheel in a formula that has already been proven to be favorable with the player base. But the players' voice is not what's heard here. It's their wallets, hence the vote with your wallet phrase. This also means that there is a divide between how professional critic people think about a product and it's actual consumer. Because the critic may not even devote all their time to learning the lore and game play of a game as generations go by and sequels are released and lore is added in. They sit down to play a game knowing virtually nothing about it. They're not a hard core fan. They just judge based on first impressions.
Speaking of critics. Is there a game that critics hate but fans love? Usually I find games that critics and fans like, or games that critics say it is average but fans hate with passion.
RE3 remake certainly came too soon after 2, and with a shitty multiplayer nobody wanted. If they do a RE4 or Code Veronica remake they better not fuck it up.
This is why I consider "professional" critics' opinion on anything to be factually invalid. Game series survive longer when developers listen to customer critique versus listening to critics who know less than nothing on video games.
I thought Call of Duty games were never about continuing the story of the previous one I thought every Call of Duty game was an isolated story. I had no idea that Black Ops 2 even continue the story of Black Ops 1 I thought it was its own story
@@jebreski then again bo1 is kinda it’s own story sure it ties into waw but you don’t need waw to play bo same with bo2 though they took it too far with bo3
The original Modern Warfare trilogy had stories that directly tied with each entry. Infinity Ward is doing the same thing again with the new Modern Warfare games.
Imagine being a Game Developer and all your blood, sweat and tears from 3 years of work result in a huge pile of garbage because marketing pushed to hard.
In my opinion game developer is one of the best and one of the worst jobs. You can give people a game which they use to get out of their bed moods. But then people in suites step up and tell you "change that", "this content will be a DLC" and blablabla. Then in the end some people hate your hard work.
@Eli Cosner Not pushed by the media? They pushed the Agenda driven envelope if you ask me talk about forced down peoples throats. Thats if people even swallowed the purchase after the reveals of said Agenda drives?
It is more complicated than that. I would say the lead design/dev/director is responsible how the game turns out. Dont get me wrong I would love to blame marketing for the monsoon season but...you know
@@bombomos I should tell you that their is a secret apple behind the ark in the temple that unlocks a secret boss and it is damn near impossible to beat
@@viniciusdias5887 well there's alot of stories "cut" from thr bible and borrowed from other works. The gospel of judas for example is super trippy but interesting for example.
@@viniciusdias5887 I too believe in ridiculous stories that contradict scientific facts simply because they're really old and I was told to believe them like a good sheep. Superman is my Messiah.
I think you could have talked more about story-driven franchises. A lot of these don't end, and they should, what's the point of a story if it never ends? That's a big problem with movies nowadays, most of the top-sellers are old stories that came back for no reason other than because the name sells. I hope video games never reach this point.
I dunno, theres alot of contenders for that such as MW2, Me2, Halo2, Bo2, Sonic 2 and if you include 3rd entries and further it gets even larger with Halo3, UT3, TES:IV and V, to name a few.
@@venge1894 allthough I love all the games you mentioned, I believe Borderlands 2 definitely is the best one. as it, in every single way, improves apon the original. The sequels you mentioned are still in contention with their previous titles on which one is the better game.
No joke, this video may have been about games but so much of what ActMan was saying also applied to the Disney sequels, specially when he talked about how how important it is to innovate without alienating your audience. Disney somehow failed spectacularly by refusing to innovate all the superficial aspects of the sequels (same setting, same story, same spaces ships, same character archetypes except worse) while at the same time taking fundemental Star Wars elements and altering them beyond recognition (Luke Skywalker, Force lore, Palpatine's death). They managed to capture the worst of both worlds and it ends up making the sequels only Star Wars in name. It has lasers, lightsabers, and spaceships but it doesn't feel like Star Wars, just a hollow shell. And that mades me so indescribably sad. :-(
-Improve on what made the original awesome. -Don’t toss out everything about the original and make it around a completely new story game and engine. 🎩 🐍 no step on SNEK!🇺🇸🇭🇰
@@shalindelta7 the point of halo 4 was to show. "Hey look its Microsoft here making Halo on a better engine. This is a guarantee that this sequel will be good. Wow the grass is damp!" See what I mean?
@@shalindelta7 reach was good for it's medium graphics. The cutscenes were some of the best back then though. Games should only focus on engines if they improve gameplay not graphics
Yeah, there’s a definite issue where companies just try to superficially copy other franchise’s successes. Like I’m a massive fan of Assassin’s Creed. Ubisoft is obviously tired of making AC games, they don’t wanna do it anymore. But AC makes a lot of money. So when they make their historical action RPGs, instead of making a good action RPG they try to do an action RPG with AC mechanics and premises and it ends up hurting the action RPG experience. Like the best thing to do is to divert the IP. Have your historical action RPGs and cut out all the AC fat, build up that IP and give those games their own identity. Then revisit the AC franchise on occasion and focus on what made AC, AC.
Yeah if I remember origin completely fucked to the assassinations with the introduction to the completely unnecessary levelling system that made the signature mechanic just not work on certain enemies because if the Leviel difference as well as artificially limit the areas you can do missions in because lower levels don’t dole out enough XP and no matter your skill going to a higher level just destroys you
D1 was basicaly made last sec with another story in mind but changed all of it without reworking much, you get codes to read up the lore online, so all the plot of the game was not in the game.
Yes it is. Dude Destiny’s story was so bad that I had no friggin clue who Zavala, Cayde 6, or Ikora even were. So when Destiny 2’s trailer came out, I didn’t know or even really recognize these characters because all they did in D1 was provide you armor and gear and spoke to you over an intercom when you did a patrol, that is literally it. I payed little to no attention to the story at all, had no idea what I was doing or what was going on, the gameplay and the combat is the only thing that kept me going.
BEST LINE EVER /SARCASM There was even an exotic pulse rifle released for the Year 2 expansion The Taken King called No Time To Explain in reference to this line! HAHA SO FUNNY
@The one and only exotic Butters it also had a few codex entries about what happened after the bo2 but in order to read them you would have to know there's a codex
To be fair Dragon Age 2 had a much shorter development because EA didn’t care about quality and forced it out early. Basically, it had a KOTOR 2 development sent out to early to make money.
Hey man, hearing all these old soundtracks from my childhood while you were explaining everything brought me to tears. Thanks for that and the message.
Bungie: We make Halo to be accessible to newcomers, but familiar to long-time fans. The story is compelling, well-written and makes the player feel like they're in the universe and their actions have a lasting impact on the world. Activision: haha train go boom
Agent 005 I’d argue that there has been both improvements and problems, 2 steps forward and one step back. In the long run sure they’re still managing to stride ahead of their wrongdoings, but only to some degree. They have an entire studio less of help, and they’re also having some other developers work on a different project entirely. They don’t have as much manpower on Destiny as fans and haters alike would wish to think. I personally enjoy Destiny 2, I still enjoy the experience no matter how “bad” it gets.
@@LordVader1094 so its becoming repetive and we already get the guy is wishing for the NV Review but spamming the same comment over in other comment sections of other videos might get annoying?
I wish Dark Souls 2 enough time to develop fully, it has such a troubled development and it was intended to be way better, so much cool cut content can be found, and it had the most creative ideas out there, still one of my favorite games
Well we'll see how elden ring will turn out, and luckily it seems that game had a pretty healthy dev cycle. Its cool that its borrowing tons of ideas from ds2.
As much as I love that they focused a lot of attention on the relationship between Chief and Cortana, what they meant to eachother. it ate away immersion and continuity. You can't simply tell us that is was nanobots that changed and upgraded Chief's Armor, then tell us to go buy the books to completely understand what the hell is going on. Books are bonus stories. Not ripped out content that should've been in the game in the first place.
i hope 343 doesnt want us to read a book to understand the huge amount of story that happens between halo 5 and infinite, because infinite is really good but the story doesnt give enough exposition imo... im personally hoping for a prequel campaign as either chief or one of the other spartans
@@HULKHOGAN1 PS player I'm guessing? Halo Infinite was good. Don't know anyone that hated it who actually played it. Good campaign and decent multiplayer, although I'm not into fps shooter multiplayer. Oh, and normal people quit arguing and fanboying ps vs xbox by the time they're 15. I'm guessing you're not quite there yet.
@@kyledavis4325 Infinite has a bland, lifeless open-world, void of any incentive to explore, terrible characters whereas the Bungie games are renowned for amazing ones, cheaply made lazy cutscenes and little to no epic set-piece moments.
When I get excited about a sequel, all I want is 50% the original experience I fell in love with, 25% tweaks/improvements on those said original things, and 25% of something new. This is why Dark Souls had me hooked for every new game even though they really weren’t all that different (other than the map and some slight changes in mechanics/the meta).
Sequels have kinda become hit or miss in the sense that some rely on a brand name for popularity points, while others try to capture the essence of what made the predecessors amazing.
Despite everything dragon age 2 had against it the story itself and and characters are still really good, you can tell the devs did care about their work and did what they could in 2 years, the game was always a little overhated because of the controversy
Yes, I actually liked Dragon Age 2 and after a couple playthroughs...it's actually my favorite, mainly because the Hawke and his companions have the best chemistry and their happy-go-lucky vibe from one adventure to the next was done very well. The thing is that 2 is split into three acts that all could've been their own game, Hawke getting their fortune, the Qunari's attempted takeover, and the beginning of the Mage Rebellion. But since they were all in one game they weren't really given room to breath as their arcs aside the Mage Rebellion since it was the main problem and theme throughout the game. Yes it sucks that they were lazy on the map designs and changed the Darkspawns' design, which was a horrible decision, but then they made the Qunari fucking awesome and made them better than just, "really tale humanoid." Too bad they changed their culture lore a bit though, and then copletely retconned it in Inquisition. I liked the picture Sten had painted of Qun, why they changed it so that it seems more like he misinterpreted parts of it was dumb. But yeah DA2 has a lot of pros to it, it's just a shame it has just as many cons.
@@masterchiefpettyofficerspa3646 on a character and story level yeah, but presentation and technical, GTA5 without a doubt. I think they focused too much on the LA parody angle for gta5 and having 3 playable characters meant you can't really have a more personal story like Gta4 or RDR2.
@Master Chief Petty Officer Spartan John-117 For story, characters, and gameplay, absolutely. But in terms of game world, GTA 5 stomps on 4. My biggest issue with 4 was that the world just felt so lifeless that there wasn’t much point in exploring. Compare all the things you could do in San Andreas to 4 and you realize just how much was taken out. Bare bones customization for outfits, cars, property, houses, random encounters, etc. GTA V took more inspiration from SA which meant exploring the world was actually an adventure instead of a chore. It’s not that 4 didn’t have them, it’s that they were a pale comparison to SA and by extension 5.
There are franchises that I get fatigue even from someone mentioning them, like Assassin's Creed or Call of Duty -franchises. Then there are franchises that never tire me out no matter how much I play them, like The Legend of Zelda or Metroid -franchises for example. What is the biggest difference between them? The first group gets new releases annually and the devs are afraid of trying new stuff (nor they don't have time for it), while the second group only has 1-2 games per console generation and every game tries something new while sticking to its roots at the same time.
It's a different philosophy on why you green light a game: Nintendo: Is it a new experience? Does it have its own identity or a defining feature? EA, Ubisoft, etc: We need more money with little risk, how much can we recycle for a new installment and get games sales + new micro transaction economy?
Naeem Wicomb I’m the same but with call of Duty with the exception of advanced movement. For assassins creed I hope they go back to their old mechanics after Valhalla. What are your thoughts on the old and new mechanics?
Halo had to be my favourite franchise, I played the campaign numerous times. When halo 4 came out I only made it to the 4th chapter and I know why now.
Pretty sure that the protagonist “Jesus” doesn’t even show up in the first book, and God totally is inconsistent between the books. New Testament writers overstepping their bounds again
Bold move killing him off in the beginning of the sequel...is what I would say if they didn’t do it from four different perspectives and then keep mentioning him so much after he died.
@@bradcarver8127 I don't know who the fuck got the idea of killing him off like that, but they need to get fired, hope they never worked on another holy scripture ever again.
Eh. In name only. Each new numbered FF entry is a completely different game set in a completely different universe. By definition, they’re not sequels.
@@macdhomhnaill7721 he was saying about numbered sequels, not direct because if we count direct, Megaman would far surpass any franchise cause Classic goes into X series and that goes into the Zero series and ends with ZX and ZX Advent (and supposedly Legends happens after all of them)
Best sequel to me was Spyro 2: Riptos Rage and Spyro 3 Year of the Dragon. Each time definitely improved upon each other and both were way better than the first (plus tom kenny as Spyro was a huge improvement) 😊
Being serious tho, Bible 2 was less about the lore and more about the characters. A step in the right direction. Still waiting for Bible 3 or at least some DLC. Just hope they dont add pointless microtransaction.
@@MintyLime703 limited use salvations and decanonized spin-offs and sequels? Now I see why some fans changed sides to the kickstarted sequel/reboot called Koran
Agree with pretty much everything in this video. I'm so happy you made this. Also i have some suggestions for game reviews: Fallout: New Vegas, Age of Empires 2 Definitive Edition, Warhammer 40k: Space Marine.
@@christophersalinas2722 "...and He sat on a boulder, gazing upon the land and what man hath becometh, and said 'Oh fuck this, I got better things to do' as he returned to complete his Witcher 3 run."
So I won a PS4 from a contest got the game took up half my space on it from the "free to play" part of it alone finely saved up enough and spent $80 on it now it tells me I have to spend ~$70 a year just to play multiplayer. f*ck
MechWarrior to MechWarrior 2 had to be one of the he greatest improvements of a sequel I had ever seen. The first was so clunky and the second kicked off a phenomenon back in the day (even if it is mostly forgotten now).
Dark Souls 1: dark and gritty, hard add Dark Souls 2: yeah um, game about souls and a dark and complicated story, nah, what about we turn up the contrast, brightness... *The FarCry 3 Treatment*
@@besnick I unashamedly like Dark Souls 2. DS1 has a compelling story that brought me into the series, DS2 however, is the most beautiful and Majula as a homebase is a glimpse of warmth in a dreary dying world. DS3 has an excellent soundtrack and an explosive ending I'll admit tho. DS2's weakness is it's filler bosses, but Fume Knight and Alonne made up for many of them in the DLC's atleast.
@@alessandroofthemediterranean I do think it has a more distant and mysterious vibe when compared to 1 and 3. I really like that and how there are ancient civilizations without anything know about them and far more vague item descriptions, whilst for instance in 3 the lore fills in far more of the gaps, which does create a seemingly 'deeper' story but I am a big fan of how 2 gives my imagination far more to do and fill in.
This video was awesome. This is why you are one of my favorite gamingtubers. You ACG and Skill Up are my top 3 because of the skill and creativity of your guys videos. Stay awesome Act Man!!!!!!!!!
Mass Effect 2 is truly a legendary sequel, but I do wish the loot system would've made a return, rather than getting ditched entirely. It gave more reasons to explore every nook and cranny
The Act Man: These games are written in a way to allow newcomers to shape the story as if they played the previous games... Me: So the plot can be understandable? Metal Gear Solid series: **sweats profusely**
LOL i made the mistake of playing MGS (i can’t remember which one, i think it was 5) and i was so lost on the story i just stopped caring about it and enjoyed the gameplay. i enjoyed the game, but the story had me scratching my head and just pretending to understand it
The entire Ratchet and Clank franchise has been fantastic, particularly the PS2 and the "big" PS3 releases. I still replay them all the time, can't say that about many other franchises. The "weird" ones they did like All 4 One was also really fun although I understand why some people didn't like them. Crack in Time has a special place in my heart, the entire series had really smooth controls and gameplay but Crack in Time refined that to perfection
Despite all this... a lot of people accused Saints Row 1 and 2 copying off the Grand Theft Auto series. Now with Grand Theft Auto: 5 online they're copying off Saints Row series. Oh... how the tables have turned when it comes to irony.
22:05 Honestly, I can't imagine how amazing could be a sequel for Conker in the current generations. Damn, Microsoft and Rareware are loosing a big exclusive right there, "Conker's Another Bad Fur Day" Talking about Conker, have you mind talking about what happened to Rare/Conker's Franchise? It would be so cool and nostalgic
It has everything to rock. A classic cartoonish +18 game with an alcoholic squirrel with improved game mechanics, fun and diverse Multiplayer and a incredible storytelling. It can be soo good, but idk what the hell happened to Rare
To answer that first question it is because EA bought BioWare in late 2007 / 2008 well into the development of Mass Effect 2 released January 2010, which is also why the end seems rather rushed compared to the rest of the game. Meanwhile Dragon Age 2 was an almost completely designed game under EA's watchful eyes.
Yes sir. Can’t wait for the remastered coming in March. ME is just go good, makes me want another ME. But we gotta wait 4 years for ME4 hopefully they do it right. Maybe we play as Liara, maybe Shepard.
@@Seb318 i don't think making the player play liara is a good idea. She's already an established character, the whole rpg aspect of mass effect wouldn't work for her.
What about the resident evil series Like how the older games are survival horror with a fixed camera, and how 4 changed the series into a action game with a third person perspective and 7 turned the series back to survival horror with a first person perspective
@Big Boss not just me metacritic does the talking last of us 1 story is way better than 2nd story but last of us 2 gameplay is way better than the first one
Big Boss no the story is bad. What’s the point of making a sequel to a game with a completed story arch? The revenge story arch itself shouldn’t have been stretched to an entire game’s length and Ellie doesn’t even kill Abby in the end. There’s no reason she should spare her as she has just trekked months, wasting supplies, losing friends, getting serious injuries, etc just to find one person. 1 memory flashback is probably not enough to have an entire character change happen in a minute and convince themselves that letting someone you’ve wasted tons of supplies on is worth it. It’s even worse that Abby doesn’t just kill Ellie afterward since there’s no reason for her to let someone she know nows is following her to live and on one is going to notice if she does. It’s a post apocalyptic world and no one in their right mind is going to be civilized
Download Opera GX FOR FREE: opr.as/Theactman
Best and Worst game sequels of all time? Which do you pick?
The Act Man I’m an act fan
AYE ACT MAN :D
Shut up
The problem with video sponsorships
Best: Resident Evil 2
Worst: CoD: Black Ops 3
Will we ever get a “the problem with sequels 2”?
Yeah but it's probably gonna ditch the original formula and be based on micro transactions via sponsorships...
Also part 3: the problems with sequels of sequels
meta af
I think I have to now. Will it be better than the first? Flip a coin
@@TheActMan what are your thoughts on dragon age inquisition?
An actually good game sequel: Titanfall 2
(It's been two years, you don't have to argue with it lmao)
Sad it never got the attention it deserved, my fav shooter ever
Borderlands 2 is a great sequel too
@@panuli It really is a good game sequel too
Bo2
I love Titanfall 2 it needs a sequel or attention
Actually good Sequels:
- Team Fortress 2
- Half-Life 2
- Left 4 Dead 2
- Black Ops 2
Truth
Red dead 2, elder scrolls 3-5, MW2&3, The force unleashed 2, Ac2-Black flag, the Witcher 3, The walking dead season game 2&4, fallout 3,4, new Vegas, plenty of great sequels
inFAMOUS 2?
@@bpat9968 Fallout 4... no
Anything with number 2 is mostly great.
No wonder Valve is afraid of number 3 lol.
bruh the game "chess" literally survived years without a terrible sequel, congrats to them 🙏🙏🙏
I think u mean milleniums
Its because chess focused on adding new modes instead of sequels. I think 5d chess is its first sequel and while i think its really good its a sequel to chess in the same way oceans 8 is to oceans 13, as in it was a good thing but i think putting it in the same universe as its predecessors did more harm than good.
Been playing for centuries, never gets old.
@@TribuneAquila fr dont forget about the major updates years ago too. the castling update changed the game fr
This is a Quality comment lol
I've never understood the mentality that game publishers/developer's have with firing a load of your staff that worked on the first game for example and then bringing in new ones for the sequels, well I know the real reason why ... money but,
Having an unstoppable team of workers that work around each other is where passion thrives in my opinion and in turn create great sequels and goals.
Old guys are annoying and want raises and benefits and hours. New guys are fresh outta college and desperate for a buck to pay off loans, way cheaper and easier to manipulate and abuse.
@@boygenius538_8 100% agree, dont worry , I knew the answer to it tbh because like I said money , cheaper to employ part time workers than keep someone that will want a raise after a few years.
Unfortunately it happens in all industries
The old bioware team especially writers were quite good... I mean whoever was the creative genius behind star wars old republic stuff and jade empire and dragon age 1 and mass effect... Man bioware team was hot back then shooting out ips
Its an strategy used by companies and comporations, not only in the games industry but in every branch. They will always refresh the people who works inside
The funny thing is that from a technical standpoint keeping the original devs is potentially many times more profitable, but because it requires a bit more down payment, (as in they pay in the short term a bit more) they stupidly shoot themselves in the foot and go under, its a bit ironic when we know as well that one or two failed games isn't gonna tank those studios, its interesting that the smaller and less successful studios are more likely to keep old blood. Also part of the point of AAA publishers was suppose to be to compensate for flops without guaranteeing the company went under.
But sequel fever isn't unbreakable. Empire strikes back, return of the king and MW2 are some of the best examples
I'd like to add Super Mario Galaxy 2, not as perfect as the first, but still magnificent.
Add bo2 to the list
Resident Evil 2
Uncharted
Fallout new Vegas
Here’s a topic I’m curious about: when is a dlc truly worthy to be considered an expansion?
When it lasts at least longer than 6 hours to complete
@@TheKenji2221 ok, bit too much
@@Peanut83176
He asked when a DLC can be considered an expansion.
Expansions back in the days (grandpa mode on) lasted at least that much. Otherwise they were considered as simple add-ons
When it's Diablo 2 Lord of Destruction, of CCG Zero Hour
Take a look at dying light the following
I’m surprised you didn’t mention Devil May Cry. That’s a rocky sequel history. 1 was… different. 2 was a dumpster fire. 3 was godlike. 4 was controversial. And 5 was a beautiful return to form.
Oh. And I guess DMC was… okay…
@@cypher838 DMC 2 is a terrible sequence and a worst game
imo dmc devil may cry was a good game with a lot of flaws but it wasnt a good dmc game(they massacred my boi vergil)
Angels in Bible 1: "prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrpupupupprprrrrrrrrprprprprrprprprprprp"
Angels in Bible 2: " I am the servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the Flame of Anor… The dark fire will not avail you! Flame of Udûn!"
Ayy midnight. What is up my DOOT!
Can some one explain the joke?
@@hudsondunn8385 angel in Bible 2 is Gandalf
@@hudsondunn8385 yes
@@hudsondunn8385 There's this recent meme about the actual biblical representation of angels. They're not the romanticized version of a Serafín, but odd looking amorph amalgams of wheels and eyes, and we all know that now because of a meme.
The problem with not making “Why is Fallout:New Vegas is so amazing?”
The problem is we’ve been waiting
Because it has a good story and is very immersive (despite it running like shit and not having the best graphics)
@Nagger Oh I know I'm just saying the base game runs like shit
even the dialogue boxes were massive improvement from fallout 3
@@thetrashmann8140 the gameplay is amazing too. Exploring the mojave is a great time. Bonding with companions is a great time. Finding unique solutiond to quests based on you characters skillset is wonderful.
Patrolling the mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter.
"Hey All , Act Man here "
- Act Man
SCOTT
HOWDY, PARTNERS!
The Act Man Are you gonna make a video about Hitman it’s way underrated.
@@Jim-lg8sf hold up
Did you just say underrated?
It was nominated for best action game in 2016 and 2012 and has well received reviews
“Hey All, Scott Here.”
Honestly, bioshock 2 is probably one of my favorite games of all time, I liked the 1st one and most people I think hold that one in higher regards, but idk something about the 2nd for me had this irreplaceable sadness and vibe. Beat the whole game only using the drill on one play through lmao.
I thought the gameplay was way more fun in Bioshock 2. The drill was badass
I’m so glad someone agrees Bioshock 2 is absolutely fantastic! The whole idea of playing as a Big Daddy, the storyline that is so closely connected to the characters- including the main character… honestly amazing.
I played 1 and then infinite. I enjoyed all of bioshock 1, but didn't really like the shield system in infinite. You could just go run and gun in bioshock 1, but then in infinite you're just hiding behind cover the entire game waiting for your shield to regenerate.
Personally, I think Bioshock 2 is the best in the series by a mile.
@@1un4cy honestly if you never played bioshock 2 I’d highly recommend
"Why does Mario Party have so many sequels?"
Square Enix fans: *nervous laughter*
Technically final fantasy doesn’t have sequels, just more games that have the same name.
Resunoit thanks for the definition of a sequel. Even if they aren’t the same story line it’s still a continuation of the universe
@@boygenius538_8 It is a different universe though, they rebuild the lore every time. Most amount of final fantasy sequels is FF13 having 3 games altogether.
Square Enix: What does the word 'final' mean?
*Laughs in Half-Life where the sequels are 1, 2, and A*
"Mario party has the most numerical entries."
Final Fantasy: nervous sweating
FIFA is trying not to be seen over the the corner
Has the way FF names their games not confused customers? When I was a kid I was like "Final Fantasy 10? I never played the last 9" lol
Call of duty with game #17 coming up
literally any sports game: *nervous laugh*
Lol, final fantasy immediately came to my mind when he said that.
“How many possible sequels can you make on the same game with the same rule book?”
COD:*nervous sweating*
The best though :Assassins Creed or Ubisoft games in General. They all follow the open world generic formula and AC series hasn't changed barely since AC III
@@Speer788 How's something like Assassin's Creed Odyssey or Valhalla anything like AC3
@@Speer788 AC now is nothing like AC was years ago. It is much more open world RPG than stealth assassination game these days and has been this way since Origins.
@@venge1894 I will says just like Revelations (4th game at the time), Valhalla is the 3rd game with this new style and it's already stale imo. Either that or it's just boring on it's own making is AC3 levels of boredom lol AC3 imo was so bad I skipped Rogue and Black Flag only to return with Unity. Origins made AC to feel fresh again for me, then Odyssey surprisingly surpassed it for me, but Vahalla is full stop Ubisoft formula...time for revamp..not 4 more games using this basic Ubi engine
@@Speer788 lmao assassin's creed isn't even about assassins anymore. Should be called warrior creed instead
Dead Space 2 is an amazing sequel
Spiderman 2 was an awesome sequel
Halo 3 was one of the best sequels ever made
Spider-Man 2 is yet to come
@@youtubeaccountserio2633 what do you mean?
@@youtubeaccountserio2633 mean movie😅
Halo 3 isn't really a sequel, but it does slap
@@pogethedoge ... what? That doesn't make sense.
I mean I thought Black ops 3’s story made complete sense, here’s a summary: Train goes boom
ThE FrOzEn FoReSt ((when really they were just looking for Canada))
😂
I think black ops 3’s plot has potential, the problem is that it doesn’t really tell it
Yeah u are both right train GO Boom, my fave storyline, it would have been cool if u had to travel throught time to stop a train from exploding
Most bullshit thing I’ve ever played or seen. Im able to turn my brain off and enjoy something, but when you pretend your deep and you just aren’t it does not work at all. If “train go boom” was all it was it’d be way better.
"A bad connection to your fanbase can lead to resentment."
We know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two.
-Todd Howard
The "newest testament"
He saw it on the internet
It just works
16 Times the Detail!
16 times the shit
"Change is hard to sell"
Resident evil 3 remake as of recent comes to mind. It was not as well received as the second game because they straight up removed some portions of the game in order to speed up development whereas the second game had more time to be fully cooked.
WoW's cataclysm expansion was not well received by majority of the player base because it took away some portion of its identity away from the players. What was a game that you grew up playing for a few years is no more and instead you have something else in place. Runescape going into evolution of combat had the same reaction from the players as well. Half the player base had quit basically over night.
Look at how well iphones sell every year. It's more proof that people want the same old item with as small change here and there. The overall product has to remind them of the one they are giving up for the new one. People, as a whole, do not like change in general. If something is completely different to the point where you no longer recognize it, it's a total turn off and the consumer is not going to be interested in learning the new product and buying it.
This whole push for constant change in video games, is the result of reviewer critique. If a game is not changed all that much, the reviewers point it out and the developers take that feed back and try and reinvent the wheel in a formula that has already been proven to be favorable with the player base. But the players' voice is not what's heard here. It's their wallets, hence the vote with your wallet phrase. This also means that there is a divide between how professional critic people think about a product and it's actual consumer. Because the critic may not even devote all their time to learning the lore and game play of a game as generations go by and sequels are released and lore is added in. They sit down to play a game knowing virtually nothing about it. They're not a hard core fan. They just judge based on first impressions.
Speaking of critics. Is there a game that critics hate but fans love? Usually I find games that critics and fans like, or games that critics say it is average but fans hate with passion.
@@takezokimura2571 critics hated the first monster hunter game. fans loved it. that's all I'm gonna say.
RE3 remake certainly came too soon after 2, and with a shitty multiplayer nobody wanted. If they do a RE4 or Code Veronica remake they better not fuck it up.
@@takezokimura2571 critics like tlou2 I think
This is why I consider "professional" critics' opinion on anything to be factually invalid. Game series survive longer when developers listen to customer critique versus listening to critics who know less than nothing on video games.
I thought Call of Duty games were never about continuing the story of the previous one I thought every Call of Duty game was an isolated story. I had no idea that Black Ops 2 even continue the story of Black Ops 1 I thought it was its own story
And technically BO1 tied into World at War. Reznov was a main character in both games
@@jebreski then again bo1 is kinda it’s own story sure it ties into waw but you don’t need waw to play bo same with bo2 though they took it too far with bo3
The original Modern Warfare trilogy had stories that directly tied with each entry. Infinity Ward is doing the same thing again with the new Modern Warfare games.
That's what I want cod to do tbh
Reply 5
Imagine being a Game Developer and all your blood, sweat and tears from 3 years of work result in a huge pile of garbage because marketing pushed to hard.
Pretty much every aaa game for the past decade, save for a handful of absolute gems.
Naughty dog had 7 years...... they weren’t pushed hard by the media almost the entire game is shit
In my opinion game developer is one of the best and one of the worst jobs. You can give people a game which they use to get out of their bed moods.
But then people in suites step up and tell you "change that", "this content will be a DLC" and blablabla.
Then in the end some people hate your hard work.
@Eli Cosner Not pushed by the media? They pushed the Agenda driven envelope if you ask me talk about forced down peoples throats. Thats if people even swallowed the purchase after the reveals of said Agenda drives?
It is more complicated than that. I would say the lead design/dev/director is responsible how the game turns out.
Dont get me wrong I would love to blame marketing for the monsoon season but...you know
The Bible HD Remaster had some sweet 4K Garden of Eden apples, though.
The Bible 2 did to the first one the opposite of what The Last Of Us 2 did to the original TLoU.
I'm glad they made it so that the apple gets realistically bitten instead of using a default bitten apple model!
I heard we are getting an SJW Reboot coming soon. To be honest the framerate looks a little wonky. Apparently it's rushed
Yeah but once you collected all 999 apples, The beast in the last level was way too easy. Broke the game in opinion
@@bombomos I should tell you that their is a secret apple behind the ark in the temple that unlocks a secret boss and it is damn near impossible to beat
When you said "the bible 2" I lost it.
King James V never sleeps
@@ygobe2 big brain meme
And he's right, too, it does retcon stuff.
YOU ONLY GOT THE HOLY BIBLE 2 THAT IS PUSSY SHIT I GOT THE HOLY BIBLE 4 CAUSE I AM TOO GOOD FOR THE HOLY BIBLE 3!
What episode is the Bible turns into Book of Mormon? V?
Rdr2 is a perfect example of a prequel
I like RDR2, but to me, the first redemption game was more fun.
@@Falconhawk3784yeah both were good but I slightly like rdr1 better too. I loved the fast horses lol
I lost my mind when he said, "The Bible 2 retconned a lot of the lore in the original" 🤣
lmao almost missed that.
I mean, I am a Christian and although that is a wrong comprehension of theology, I still find it a funny joke.
@@viniciusdias5887 well there's alot of stories "cut" from thr bible and borrowed from other works. The gospel of judas for example is super trippy but interesting for example.
Im not religious but I still found this funny🤣🤣🤣
@@viniciusdias5887 I too believe in ridiculous stories that contradict scientific facts simply because they're really old and I was told to believe them like a good sheep. Superman is my Messiah.
Speaking of sequels.
When are we getting “Why KOTOR II is awesome?!?!”
We need that video!!
Right after why was the last of us 2 so BAD?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
...
"You have left me an opening!"
Revanchist seriously, it is probably the best Star Wars RPG.
Even with its flaws.
I think it’s better than KOTOR I!
We are concerned that the sequel might not replicate the experience of which the original is known for
I think you could have talked more about story-driven franchises. A lot of these don't end, and they should, what's the point of a story if it never ends? That's a big problem with movies nowadays, most of the top-sellers are old stories that came back for no reason other than because the name sells. I hope video games never reach this point.
Sad Borderlands 2 wasn’t mentioned. That was like the Empire strikes back of game sequels.
I dunno, theres alot of contenders for that such as MW2, Me2, Halo2, Bo2, Sonic 2 and if you include 3rd entries and further it gets even larger with Halo3, UT3, TES:IV and V, to name a few.
@@venge1894 I meant for in the story, and gameplay department because it had tons of more content than last game and the story is much better.
@@venge1894 allthough I love all the games you mentioned, I believe Borderlands 2 definitely is the best one. as it, in every single way, improves apon the original. The sequels you mentioned are still in contention with their previous titles on which one is the better game.
Too bad BL3 sucked ass. At least the spin-off game about Jack was pretty good.
@Cham ngl i thought that game was amazing
Problems with sequels
Disney: I N T E R E S T I NG
Edit : aye thanks for likes
Problems with sequels
Disney: Good thing none of these apply to my works.
Problems with sequels
Disney: I'm gonna pretend I didn't see that
Disney : What's that you guys want sequels you never asked for. Say no more
@@Legion849 Rian Johnson: Hold my alien milk.
No joke, this video may have been about games but so much of what ActMan was saying also applied to the Disney sequels, specially when he talked about how how important it is to innovate without alienating your audience.
Disney somehow failed spectacularly by refusing to innovate all the superficial aspects of the sequels (same setting, same story, same spaces ships, same character archetypes except worse) while at the same time taking fundemental Star Wars elements and altering them beyond recognition (Luke Skywalker, Force lore, Palpatine's death). They managed to capture the worst of both worlds and it ends up making the sequels only Star Wars in name. It has lasers, lightsabers, and spaceships but it doesn't feel like Star Wars, just a hollow shell. And that mades me so indescribably sad. :-(
Woods not having the same voice actor makes me want to die
Dont be an onion
Low key everybody forgets Mason but ight
Am a God dam onion Mason
@@Kingregtabl I’m a god damn onion mason
@Arakius • _ I’m a god damn onion mason
Man the second I hear the map theme from ME2 I’m immediately hit by a tsunami of nostalgia. What a great game.
-Improve on what made the original awesome.
-Don’t toss out everything about the original and make it around a completely new story game and engine.
🎩
🐍 no step on SNEK!🇺🇸🇭🇰
Why new engine ? That's not necessary if the engine used was awesome.
Can't upvote your empire endorsement...
@@shalindelta7 the point of halo 4 was to show.
"Hey look its Microsoft here making Halo on a better engine. This is a guarantee that this sequel will be good. Wow the grass is damp!"
See what I mean?
@@shalindelta7 reach was good for it's medium graphics. The cutscenes were some of the best back then though.
Games should only focus on engines if they improve gameplay not graphics
The Act man
The acting male
The male humanoid Homo sapien sapien who is staging a act of enterteriment
The male human human?
do u guys want me to edit the comment?
@@leonardorivelorivelo9253 *y e s*
@@cranberryjuice3469 alr i edited
the homoeroticosapientertainment device, to make it simple.
I'm a Star Wars character who lives in a world where the Sequel Trilogy exists. I know the pain of a bad sequel better than anyone.
There a sequel to Star Wars?
@@JP_Crimson Yeah. It's called, "Star Peace"
Sequel Trilogy is still better than Disney Trilogy
@@big_gucci_mexicanguy the sequel trilogy *is* the disney trilogy.
- Originals
- Prequels
- Sequels
Hello there
Yeah, there’s a definite issue where companies just try to superficially copy other franchise’s successes.
Like I’m a massive fan of Assassin’s Creed. Ubisoft is obviously tired of making AC games, they don’t wanna do it anymore. But AC makes a lot of money. So when they make their historical action RPGs, instead of making a good action RPG they try to do an action RPG with AC mechanics and premises and it ends up hurting the action RPG experience.
Like the best thing to do is to divert the IP. Have your historical action RPGs and cut out all the AC fat, build up that IP and give those games their own identity. Then revisit the AC franchise on occasion and focus on what made AC, AC.
Yeah if I remember origin completely fucked to the assassinations with the introduction to the completely unnecessary levelling system that made the signature mechanic just not work on certain enemies because if the Leviel difference as well as artificially limit the areas you can do missions in because lower levels don’t dole out enough XP and no matter your skill going to a higher level just destroys you
"I don't even have time to explain why i don't have time to explain." This seriously cracked me up xD Is that really a line in the game?
Yes D1 was poorly written
D1 was basicaly made last sec with another story in mind but changed all of it without reworking much, you get codes to read up the lore online, so all the plot of the game was not in the game.
Yes it is. Dude Destiny’s story was so bad that I had no friggin clue who Zavala, Cayde 6, or Ikora even were. So when Destiny 2’s trailer came out, I didn’t know or even really recognize these characters because all they did in D1 was provide you armor and gear and spoke to you over an intercom when you did a patrol, that is literally it. I payed little to no attention to the story at all, had no idea what I was doing or what was going on, the gameplay and the combat is the only thing that kept me going.
BEST LINE EVER /SARCASM There was even an exotic pulse rifle released for the Year 2 expansion The Taken King called No Time To Explain in reference to this line! HAHA SO FUNNY
Yup
Activision: Here's black ops 3, but its got nothing to do with the last 2.
Everyone: why?
Activision: Train go boom
Tbh they put more effort into the zombies story rather than the campaign
@Leo Hernandez shadows and revelations were to complicated I mean theres a reason chronicles still has people online playing
@@Don11037 how is it complicated
@The one and only exotic Butters it also had a few codex entries about what happened after the bo2 but in order to read them you would have to know there's a codex
To be fair Dragon Age 2 had a much shorter development because EA didn’t care about quality and forced it out early. Basically, it had a KOTOR 2 development sent out to early to make money.
Kotor 2 is amazing
And it was such a shame
And I am petty sure they were developed at the same time as mass effect 2 & 3
DA3 had a lot more time and still turned out to be trash.
Yea I saw a video on that
Hey man, hearing all these old soundtracks from my childhood while you were explaining everything brought me to tears. Thanks for that and the message.
Also I'm subscribing because of this.
Bungie: We make Halo to be accessible to newcomers, but familiar to long-time fans. The story is compelling, well-written and makes the player feel like they're in the universe and their actions have a lasting impact on the world.
Activision: haha train go boom
haha aim down sights go *zoom*
Agent 005
I’d argue that there has been both improvements and problems, 2 steps forward and one step back. In the long run sure they’re still managing to stride ahead of their wrongdoings, but only to some degree. They have an entire studio less of help, and they’re also having some other developers work on a different project entirely. They don’t have as much manpower on Destiny as fans and haters alike would wish to think. I personally enjoy Destiny 2, I still enjoy the experience no matter how “bad” it gets.
@Agent 005 There's still a campaign, you just gotta manually access it through the map menu.
If you're talking about the Halo books made by Bungie then yes. The games are slightly overrated. Especially 3 and Reach.
@@masterchiefpettyofficerspa3646 that's a brave statement
What's your favourite?
I liked reach but I'll hear you out if your willing to reply
*Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for The Act Man to do a "Why Fallout New Vegas Was So Awesome"*
It will come in time, comrade.
May i say this is becoming spammy a bit
@@ScoutTrooperMan So?
@@LordVader1094 so its becoming repetive and we already get the guy is wishing for the NV Review but spamming the same comment over in other comment sections of other videos might get annoying?
@@LordVader1094 so it's fucking annoying
15:04 - "Let's not put any thought into anything"
EA: "Good thinking, you're hired"
HAHA
I wish Dark Souls 2 enough time to develop fully, it has such a troubled development and it was intended to be way better, so much cool cut content can be found, and it had the most creative ideas out there, still one of my favorite games
Well we'll see how elden ring will turn out, and luckily it seems that game had a pretty healthy dev cycle. Its cool that its borrowing tons of ideas from ds2.
@@Red-nl4lk Iam from the future I have good news elden ring is a master piece one of the highest rated game in historic history of gaming 🤰🤱🌈🤸🤙🤜👏💯
For every bloodborne, there needs to be a dark souls 2. Good things in life come in compromises
@@user-yc6dt6iz5x dark souls 2 > bloodborne respectfully, dark souls 2 is a flawed masterpiece.
Dark Souls 2 is still great, imo, but it definitely has issues.
As much as I love that they focused a lot of attention on the relationship between Chief and Cortana, what they meant to eachother. it ate away immersion and continuity. You can't simply tell us that is was nanobots that changed and upgraded Chief's Armor, then tell us to go buy the books to completely understand what the hell is going on. Books are bonus stories. Not ripped out content that should've been in the game in the first place.
i hope 343 doesnt want us to read a book to understand the huge amount of story that happens between halo 5 and infinite, because infinite is really good but the story doesnt give enough exposition imo... im personally hoping for a prequel campaign as either chief or one of the other spartans
@@christopherjones5700 Halo Infinite lol. Another failure of a Halo campaign
The nano bots thing was just insulting.
Nanobots completely changed his armor but they left the damage to his chest piece alone? 🤦🤦🤦
@@HULKHOGAN1 PS player I'm guessing? Halo Infinite was good. Don't know anyone that hated it who actually played it. Good campaign and decent multiplayer, although I'm not into fps shooter multiplayer. Oh, and normal people quit arguing and fanboying ps vs xbox by the time they're 15. I'm guessing you're not quite there yet.
@@kyledavis4325 Infinite has a bland, lifeless open-world, void of any incentive to explore, terrible characters whereas the Bungie games are renowned for amazing ones, cheaply made lazy cutscenes and little to no epic set-piece moments.
Conker Bad Fur Day... 2...
I was not expecting that, you opened a piece of memorie that I almost forgot... childhood and nazi bears!
The Mario if its gonna be a sequel to... bit made me laugh until I cried. I needed that
Bless Your Perfection
When I get excited about a sequel, all I want is 50% the original experience I fell in love with, 25% tweaks/improvements on those said original things, and 25% of something new. This is why Dark Souls had me hooked for every new game even though they really weren’t all that different (other than the map and some slight changes in mechanics/the meta).
"The Titles may be different but the sequels are all the same"
LOOOOL! The Reznov quotes are so good
“Superior , We are running out of time my friend , Can we trust you to lead us to destroy it?”
@@TheActMan I didn't realize I got a reply from you lol yea Reznov quotes are a solid 10/10
“Change is not always progress.”
- Sir Swag 2020
Love sir swag
I have mainly been enjoying games that were made before the year 2010 so yeah progress isn't needed when the setup is already well done
Obligatory political comment nobody wanted
“Lol That’s something the left doesn’t get hue hue”
@@briancooley8777 trump will make gaming great again
Sequels have kinda become hit or miss in the sense that some rely on a brand name for popularity points, while others try to capture the essence of what made the predecessors amazing.
Despite everything dragon age 2 had against it the story itself and and characters are still really good, you can tell the devs did care about their work and did what they could in 2 years, the game was always a little overhated because of the controversy
Yes, I actually liked Dragon Age 2 and after a couple playthroughs...it's actually my favorite, mainly because the Hawke and his companions have the best chemistry and their happy-go-lucky vibe from one adventure to the next was done very well.
The thing is that 2 is split into three acts that all could've been their own game, Hawke getting their fortune, the Qunari's attempted takeover, and the beginning of the Mage Rebellion. But since they were all in one game they weren't really given room to breath as their arcs aside the Mage Rebellion since it was the main problem and theme throughout the game. Yes it sucks that they were lazy on the map designs and changed the Darkspawns' design, which was a horrible decision, but then they made the Qunari fucking awesome and made them better than just, "really tale humanoid." Too bad they changed their culture lore a bit though, and then copletely retconned it in Inquisition. I liked the picture Sten had painted of Qun, why they changed it so that it seems more like he misinterpreted parts of it was dumb. But yeah DA2 has a lot of pros to it, it's just a shame it has just as many cons.
@@leoncoben6983A game with so many cons from the gameplay to the story should never rank among the best games.
@@captainhowlerwilson508 hey many people liked it don't shove your opinion everywhere
Controversy on making the combat garbage lol
Rockstar has the right idea: make every sequel better than its predecessor.
Gta online is still in GTA 5 though
GTA 4 is better than 5 though.
@@masterchiefpettyofficerspa3646 on a character and story level yeah, but presentation and technical, GTA5 without a doubt. I think they focused too much on the LA parody angle for gta5 and having 3 playable characters meant you can't really have a more personal story like Gta4 or RDR2.
@Master Chief Petty Officer Spartan John-117
For story, characters, and gameplay, absolutely. But in terms of game world, GTA 5 stomps on 4. My biggest issue with 4 was that the world just felt so lifeless that there wasn’t much point in exploring. Compare all the things you could do in San Andreas to 4 and you realize just how much was taken out. Bare bones customization for outfits, cars, property, houses, random encounters, etc. GTA V took more inspiration from SA which meant exploring the world was actually an adventure instead of a chore. It’s not that 4 didn’t have them, it’s that they were a pale comparison to SA and by extension 5.
Yet Rockstar has no communication with the community or care about single player expansions
There are franchises that I get fatigue even from someone mentioning them, like Assassin's Creed or Call of Duty -franchises.
Then there are franchises that never tire me out no matter how much I play them, like The Legend of Zelda or Metroid -franchises for example.
What is the biggest difference between them? The first group gets new releases annually and the devs are afraid of trying new stuff (nor they don't have time for it), while the second group only has 1-2 games per console generation and every game tries something new while sticking to its roots at the same time.
Nintendo has been playing the long game for decades. I'm actually curious when EA will cannibalize itself because it didn't hit its numbers.
I can never get tired of AC...
Unless they release something like Odyssey again ☹️
It's a different philosophy on why you green light a game:
Nintendo: Is it a new experience? Does it have its own identity or a defining feature?
EA, Ubisoft, etc: We need more money with little risk, how much can we recycle for a new installment and get games sales + new micro transaction economy?
Naeem Wicomb I’m the same but with call of Duty with the exception of advanced movement. For assassins creed I hope they go back to their old mechanics after Valhalla. What are your thoughts on the old and new mechanics?
@@ProperlyBasic11 ubisoft is very generous with their micro transactions
9:12
There’s a simple reason for all of this Act Man, and that’s because train go boom.
Wut happen when train no boom?
@@TheActMan you realise that you're in a simulation inside a simulation
Firestorm 1101 “EmOtIoNaL ReAlItY”
@@TheActMan train always go boom
@@TheActMan TRAIN GO BOOM, Theres nothing else to it
Halo had to be my favourite franchise, I played the campaign numerous times. When halo 4 came out I only made it to the 4th chapter and I know why now.
Pretty sure that the protagonist “Jesus” doesn’t even show up in the first book, and God totally is inconsistent between the books. New Testament writers overstepping their bounds again
Bold move killing him off in the beginning of the sequel...is what I would say if they didn’t do it from four different perspectives and then keep mentioning him so much after he died.
@@bradcarver8127 I don't know who the fuck got the idea of killing him off like that, but they need to get fired, hope they never worked on another holy scripture ever again.
Jesus just came outta nowhere
I love this comment
The Act Man he seems kinda interesting tho, hope they don’t kill him off...
Can't wait for his thoughts on Marvel's Avengers
Frustration
Sponge man
Title “Why was Marvel’s Avengers SO MEDIOCRE?!”
I can see the title: "Why is Marvel's Avengers so MEDIOCRE!?"
Spider-Ant is it a bad game?
"i believe Mario Party hs the biggest number of sequels."
Final Fantasy: "Am i a joke to you?"
Those arent actually sequels though
Eh. In name only. Each new numbered FF entry is a completely different game set in a completely different universe. By definition, they’re not sequels.
what about cod lol
@@macdhomhnaill7721 he was saying about numbered sequels, not direct because if we count direct, Megaman would far surpass any franchise cause Classic goes into X series and that goes into the Zero series and ends with ZX and ZX Advent (and supposedly Legends happens after all of them)
@@OmegaCoolsterDX What about need for speed?
Best sequel to me was Spyro 2: Riptos Rage and Spyro 3 Year of the Dragon. Each time definitely improved upon each other and both were way better than the first (plus tom kenny as Spyro was a huge improvement) 😊
My childhood😍😍
@@rich4446mine too 😁 still play them all to this day. Hence my PFP 😂
“The Bible 2 retconned a lot from the original”
100 percent agree
That's not really a statement you can agree or disagree with lol
Being serious tho, Bible 2 was less about the lore and more about the characters. A step in the right direction.
Still waiting for Bible 3 or at least some DLC. Just hope they dont add pointless microtransaction.
@@MintyLime703 limited use salvations and decanonized spin-offs and sequels? Now I see why some fans changed sides to the kickstarted sequel/reboot called Koran
"The Bible 2".
Not even a minute and I'm rolling xD
@@jarlbalgruuf7701 the original's characters are much better written
@@kinglattice705 they were more fucked up, but also more realistic.
I mean, who wouldn't want to rape angels?
@@check2765 maybe cause it's the word of God. It also has good mechanics
@@kinglattice705 mechanics?
Bible 1 has a much better story
Agree with pretty much everything in this video. I'm so happy you made this.
Also i have some suggestions for game reviews: Fallout: New Vegas, Age of Empires 2 Definitive Edition, Warhammer 40k: Space Marine.
Why just fallout new vegas and not the whole franchise
This perfectly describes my issues on Battlefield 2042 and this video was made last year and still holds true
“Why?” Because “Train go boom.”
Outcome.....train go boom
That's the only good part
@Bloodied Machete that's not funny because I've heard that countless times
@Bloodied Machete also fallout new Vegas: where's my platinum chip
@Bloodied Machete what's true
Can’t pay attention.
The Man’s grown such a gorgeous beard.
Dude he’s all booked out
That's not a gorgeous beard tho. Keep it real that's a struggle beard.
Yes he has
It gives him POWER. (O'u'O)
wait a whole second what happens when he shaves his beard then
As someone who took classes about the Bible, I laughed so hard. You know what you are talking about.
Watch for Bible 3, coming when Christ returns
@@christophersalinas2722 "...and He sat on a boulder, gazing upon the land and what man hath becometh, and said 'Oh fuck this, I got better things to do' as he returned to complete his Witcher 3 run."
So you slay goblins?
@@gug1297 it's a better position than being the monk.
@@aubreyhuff46 yep
Just found this channel and this was the exact type of content I was looking for.
Imagine making a multiplayer and have 2 second kill barriers
Wait are talking-
Yep you are
So I won a PS4 from a contest got the game took up half my space on it from the "free to play" part of it alone finely saved up enough and spent $80 on it now it tells me I have to spend ~$70 a year just to play multiplayer.
f*ck
Error Name not found What game did you get?
@@Nobody_Imp0rtant What game?
@@BullFrogFace MW/warzone
a bad sequel:
"train go boom"
An awesome sequel:
"That's one less loose ends"
Don't remind me of that Ghosts was more than enough . Black ops 3 is nowhere near hated as much as Ghosts
Ughh... I dont want to summon certain memories. I refuse! Aww shit too late
MechWarrior to MechWarrior 2 had to be one of the he greatest improvements of a sequel I had ever seen. The first was so clunky and the second kicked off a phenomenon back in the day (even if it is mostly forgotten now).
Act Man: Mario Party probably has the most numbered entries.
Final Fantasy: Am I a joke to you?
Madden series
Need for speed: allow me to introduce myself
Ah good to know you are copy and pasting another persons joke, very pog
FIFA: ._.
Call of Duty: :p
dies in Dark Souls 2
Achivement unlocked "this is Dark Souls, get used to it lol"
Dark Souls 1: dark and gritty, hard add
Dark Souls 2: yeah um, game about souls and a dark and complicated story, nah, what about we turn up the contrast, brightness...
*The FarCry 3 Treatment*
@@besnick well, at least the story is still there
@@besnick I unashamedly like Dark Souls 2. DS1 has a compelling story that brought me into the series, DS2 however, is the most beautiful and Majula as a homebase is a glimpse of warmth in a dreary dying world. DS3 has an excellent soundtrack and an explosive ending I'll admit tho. DS2's weakness is it's filler bosses, but Fume Knight and Alonne made up for many of them in the DLC's atleast.
@@ThiccboiSalmon I sometimes think I'm the only one that liked DS2 lore more than the rest. It's the darkest one of the three imo.
@@alessandroofthemediterranean I do think it has a more distant and mysterious vibe when compared to 1 and 3. I really like that and how there are ancient civilizations without anything know about them and far more vague item descriptions, whilst for instance in 3 the lore fills in far more of the gaps, which does create a seemingly 'deeper' story but I am a big fan of how 2 gives my imagination far more to do and fill in.
“What’s your favorite sequel”
No one:
Theactman: “the bible 2
Jesus is back, and he ain’t crucifucking around this time. THE BIBLE 3
@@Xavieus Bible 3, also known as the Qur'an
World War 2 might be the worst sequel then.
@@freewillgrain9 Yeah Germany basically used hacks and the United States used God mode worst plot points ever
@@samuelkibunda6960 yeah and the villain was so unrealistic he was way too one dimensional.
This video was awesome. This is why you are one of my favorite gamingtubers. You ACG and Skill Up are my top 3 because of the skill and creativity of your guys videos. Stay awesome Act Man!!!!!!!!!
"What is this?
A GAME FOR ANTS?!?!"
I love your content! You always come up with great subjects.
Truth
Destiny 2: went free to play, still one of the most expensive games ever.
I've been a destiny fan for about 4 years and I just have to say.
True
really? wow literally has you pay a costly monthly subscription & destiny is expensive??
@@godspeedthe13th microtransactions bruh
@@AleK0451 if your talking about the cosmetic microtransactions that hardly counts since there not required
@@dragonwing4ever i was taking a wild guess if im honest
Mass Effect 2 is truly a legendary sequel, but I do wish the loot system would've made a return, rather than getting ditched entirely. It gave more reasons to explore every nook and cranny
Mass effect will be in my heart forever
I’m surprised he didn’t talk about Rdr2
Same
Isn't that a prequel though? And I thought it was very well received.
Jacob R well he did talk about good sequels like Mass Effect 2
Well I think he said in one of his previous videos he hasn’t played RDR1 or RDR2.
Because Red Dead Redemption 2 isn't a sequel, it's a prequel.
The Act Man: These games are written in a way to allow newcomers to shape the story as if they played the previous games...
Me: So the plot can be understandable?
Metal Gear Solid series: **sweats profusely**
Team fortress 2:
Those games are confusing even with full context
Come on its pretty easy to understand
LOL i made the mistake of playing MGS (i can’t remember which one, i think it was 5) and i was so lost on the story i just stopped caring about it and enjoyed the gameplay. i enjoyed the game, but the story had me scratching my head and just pretending to understand it
@@matthewmccoy7437 You could just read a bit about the lore of the franchise before getting into it.
"Why are we in a car" I'm keeping this quote
We are concerned that The Act Man may be replicating the experience that perfection is known for
I liked where Ratchet and Clank and Jak and Daxter went in the sequels.
the sequels were better by far
@@magical_lizard731 yeah I was more of a ratchet and clank guy. Going commando and sly 2 for me are the best ps2 games iv ever played.
The entire 2000s ratchet and clank games were bangers.
The entire Ratchet and Clank franchise has been fantastic, particularly the PS2 and the "big" PS3 releases. I still replay them all the time, can't say that about many other franchises. The "weird" ones they did like All 4 One was also really fun although I understand why some people didn't like them. Crack in Time has a special place in my heart, the entire series had really smooth controls and gameplay but Crack in Time refined that to perfection
@@hivanberg3681 qq
The Saints Row games experimented with their sequels so much, that they feel different from their roots and how they started.
2 was my favourite. Kinda out there but not batshit crazy yet
Despite all this... a lot of people accused Saints Row 1 and 2 copying off the Grand Theft Auto series. Now with Grand Theft Auto: 5 online they're copying off Saints Row series. Oh... how the tables have turned when it comes to irony.
@Disturbed individual with a dark, troubled past sounds like you're just mad the game decided to be its own game instead of GTA
Saints Row The Third is the best Saints Row, they started with being a GTA clone then it turn into it's own thing.
Still enjoyable at least. Gat out of hell was too short though
Holy shit I've never actually wanted to watch through a whole sponsor part lol
i was a beta tester and, ill say, its gotten so much better than 2-3 years ago. i dont even touch chrome or explorer anymore.
It had my interest, just because it wasn't another Raycon sponsor; it's basically the new Raid: Shadow Legends to me now.
So true
4 words:
Raycon goooood, wires baaaad.
That bit with Dark Souls 2 is probably the best part of the video, and 14:30 is the icing on the cake.
21:24
"What makes a follow up awesome, is if innovations add to the core gameplay, not take it away."
THIS, right here. Great video.
"WHAT IS THIS?!" versus "w-what is this? ?" Is an excellent, succinct gauge for if sequels are good or not.
22:05 Honestly, I can't imagine how amazing could be a sequel for Conker in the current generations.
Damn, Microsoft and Rareware are loosing a big exclusive right there, "Conker's Another Bad Fur Day"
Talking about Conker, have you mind talking about what happened to Rare/Conker's Franchise? It would be so cool and nostalgic
It has everything to rock.
A classic cartoonish +18 game with an alcoholic squirrel with improved game mechanics, fun and diverse Multiplayer and a incredible storytelling. It can be soo good, but idk what the hell happened to Rare
To answer that first question it is because EA bought BioWare in late 2007 / 2008 well into the development of Mass Effect 2 released January 2010, which is also why the end seems rather rushed compared to the rest of the game. Meanwhile Dragon Age 2 was an almost completely designed game under EA's watchful eyes.
He actually mentioned Mass Effect 2!!! YES!!! My favourite game ever!
Yes sir. Can’t wait for the remastered coming in March. ME is just go good, makes me want another ME. But we gotta wait 4 years for ME4 hopefully they do it right. Maybe we play as Liara, maybe Shepard.
Easily top 5
@@Seb318 i don't think making the player play liara is a good idea. She's already an established character, the whole rpg aspect of mass effect wouldn't work for her.
My name’s commander Shepard and this is my favourite review on the citadel
The nostalgia with the runescape backround music is so amazing makes me wana go play runescape
9:18 im hoping for "train go boom"
What about the resident evil series Like how the older games are survival horror with a fixed camera, and how 4 changed the series into a action game with a third person perspective and 7 turned the series back to survival horror with a first person perspective
"See, there is a sequel wasn't as good"
- Joel Miller, breaking the fourth wall in The Last Of Us 2
Agree
@Big Boss we talking about the story cause it's trash and Joel's dead but the gameplay is awesome
@Big Boss not just me metacritic does the talking last of us 1 story is way better than 2nd story but last of us 2 gameplay is way better than the first one
SJW trash.
Big Boss no the story is bad. What’s the point of making a sequel to a game with a completed story arch? The revenge story arch itself shouldn’t have been stretched to an entire game’s length and Ellie doesn’t even kill Abby in the end. There’s no reason she should spare her as she has just trekked months, wasting supplies, losing friends, getting serious injuries, etc just to find one person. 1 memory flashback is probably not enough to have an entire character change happen in a minute and convince themselves that letting someone you’ve wasted tons of supplies on is worth it. It’s even worse that Abby doesn’t just kill Ellie afterward since there’s no reason for her to let someone she know nows is following her to live and on one is going to notice if she does. It’s a post apocalyptic world and no one in their right mind is going to be civilized
In video games, sequels are usually an attempt to broaden the scope of the original and improve engine capability.
You either die a hero or live long enough to see The Act Man make "Why is the Batman Arkham series so awesome"
17:35 - 17.42
I wanna give you a hug. My favourite Mario Party game ever made.