I can respect a person that can also learn from other peoples mistakes without having to make them all by themselves. A long time ago I heard something that has served me well for decades and that is " I will learn from others mistakes because there is no way I will live long enough to make them all myself."
there's no need to delve into the darkness for some people, and that is the most effective way to never give way to it. they are still genuinely good people, that is not suddenly nullified due to them not being offered the path of darkness. All forms of good is situational: if faced between life and death, would you save yourself or someone else? and furthermore if you did save yourself was this actually innately selfish in not wanting to live with the guilt of having lived while the other sacrificed themself? ... and so on with other similar introspections. such an argument could be made. but is being good a matter of actions rather than thoughts, what ultimately transpires? I have a strange sphere of judgement for it myself: - good intent, good effect on society (depends on how you define it**) = obviously a good person - good intent, bad effect on society = bad person - bad intent, good effect on society = good person - bad intent, bad effect = bad person People will not remember you for what you wanted to do and intended to do, but for what you actually did. A good person does good for society, technically. A fulfilled person who lives a good life is not necessarily a good person. But to live ones life according to what is most important to them is the most important thing. Being a good person does not matter when you are dead. Hero stories do inspire us though. But antihero stories also intrigue us, which tells us a lot about how we perceive evil as interesting meanwhile shun it in society because of the potential negative impact it has on ourselves. In the end, it's just mitigating potential damage to ourselves. Though of course living our most fulfilled lives while being able to bring others closer to their most fulfilled lives is the most ideal scenario. ** I say by the degree of outcropping well-being spready to others + fecundity of the benefit; if choosing between a benefit of people but negative impact on others, I weight the negative impact twice as much; 50x as much if uninvolved parties that were dragged into it for the sake of a seeming 'greater good'; really, a greater good is a tough prediction anyways, which is why this doesn't really work on a wider scale and i have this seemingly high multiple for weighting in this specific case
Yes but the MARRY JAIN HERO, somehow never needs to clime out of hell.. As she is somehow born perfect! Hence the new HERO TYPE, that is now being given to society! The Democrat party and Liberal party, have both said, "Problem will now be solve, as we have now put a women in charge!"... Funny part is said problems have never got solved.. Worse Yet people are now acting like they have been let down. Are are getting madder by the minute.. Were if a man was in charge they would likely not have got their HOPES UP, to the same level! So in the END the MARRY JAIN HERO, type has harmed women more than anything! But giving they an Idea they can not live up to! Yet having a society that expects them to be such a HERO TYPE!
I can respect a person that can also learn from other peoples mistakes without having to make them all by themselves. A long time ago I heard something that has served me well for decades and that is " I will learn from others mistakes because there is no way I will live long enough to make them all myself."
there's no need to delve into the darkness for some people, and that is the most effective way to never give way to it. they are still genuinely good people, that is not suddenly nullified due to them not being offered the path of darkness. All forms of good is situational: if faced between life and death, would you save yourself or someone else? and furthermore if you did save yourself was this actually innately selfish in not wanting to live with the guilt of having lived while the other sacrificed themself? ... and so on with other similar introspections. such an argument could be made. but is being good a matter of actions rather than thoughts, what ultimately transpires? I have a strange sphere of judgement for it myself:
- good intent, good effect on society (depends on how you define it**) = obviously a good person
- good intent, bad effect on society = bad person
- bad intent, good effect on society = good person
- bad intent, bad effect = bad person
People will not remember you for what you wanted to do and intended to do, but for what you actually did. A good person does good for society, technically. A fulfilled person who lives a good life is not necessarily a good person. But to live ones life according to what is most important to them is the most important thing. Being a good person does not matter when you are dead.
Hero stories do inspire us though. But antihero stories also intrigue us, which tells us a lot about how we perceive evil as interesting meanwhile shun it in society because of the potential negative impact it has on ourselves. In the end, it's just mitigating potential damage to ourselves. Though of course living our most fulfilled lives while being able to bring others closer to their most fulfilled lives is the most ideal scenario.
** I say by the degree of outcropping well-being spready to others + fecundity of the benefit; if choosing between a benefit of people but negative impact on others, I weight the negative impact twice as much; 50x as much if uninvolved parties that were dragged into it for the sake of a seeming 'greater good'; really, a greater good is a tough prediction anyways, which is why this doesn't really work on a wider scale and i have this seemingly high multiple for weighting in this specific case
Very prophetic.. thank you for posting.
whats her name?
Claire.
Yes but the MARRY JAIN HERO, somehow never needs to clime out of hell.. As she is somehow born perfect! Hence the new HERO TYPE, that is now being given to society!
The Democrat party and Liberal party, have both said, "Problem will now be solve, as we have now put a women in charge!"...
Funny part is said problems have never got solved.. Worse Yet people are now acting like they have been let down. Are are getting madder by the minute..
Were if a man was in charge they would likely not have got their HOPES UP, to the same level!
So in the END the MARRY JAIN HERO, type has harmed women more than anything!
But giving they an Idea they can not live up to! Yet having a society that expects them to be such a HERO TYPE!
I disagree. Goodness is a gift from God. Embrace it.
doubtful this gal knows much about the Creator
Why is she on oxygen? I hope she's OK, seems like a nice lady.
She passed a few years ago. She has a UA-cam channel somewhere.
what's with the nose hose? This is a young girl who thinks she has a life's worth of wisdom. Laughs