@@jeffreyprezalar220of course it does, it's armor is basically the same grade as standard issue body armor, that is to say, stops 7,62 nato on a good day, if even that
@@RiccardoTheBeAstyeah but it could be a bit heavier, as what is the likelihood of airborne troops having to cross a river or something bigger than what they could just drive through? And even if they came up to a river, wouldn't it be easier to hold the riverbank and wait for the enemy counterattack over it?
In this Gun Turret an 50 caliber Gattling gun type should also made to provide high volume high Firr Power to overwhelm enemy Defence with Secondary Air defence role inbuilt in it
7,62x54mmr, wich is more than enough to chew up infantry. 50 cal is redundant as it has a 30mm autocanon. 50 cal is a "neither here nor there" caliber anyway.
@@henrik_worst_of_sinners fair I thought it was 12,7 mm side cannon. But the more I think about it, it wouldn't make any sense since they already have a 30 mm automatic anti-material cannon.
@@norbertaronvarga5361 the .50 caliber is exclusively 12,7mm. Therefore all the cannon diameters you listed don't apply. 406 mm is a WW2 naval gun type battery. It's ludicrous to call that a .50 cal. No the .50 BMG is 12,7mm pistol, rifle, MG all same diameter
i wonder what that big cut out in the rear hull is for? probably for the airdrop equipment though it seems like a huge space sacrifice so their would have to be a very good reason for it on a vehicle that had to shave as much weight as possible and where space is at an absolute prmium even more then other AFVs. also the fact most versions can be airlifted and not actually dropped is interesting. as far as i can tell the Russians are the only people who have an actually viable airdropped IFV (though this if more a fire support vehicle). the best the Germans ever made was the Wesel a tiny fire support vehicle little more then a self-propelled 20mm autocannon or tow launcher (and it had to chose one or the other). and the Americans gave us the terribly flawed M551 Sheridan that tried too hard to be a tank and was insanely complex while also having armour so thin as to be pointless. Its interesting when you think about it as the Hind is also unique in that it is effectively a Flying IFV.
You can play for free now in War Thunder! War Thunder is a free-to-play vehicular combat multiplayer video game developed and published by Gaijin Entertainment.
Это великолепные машины, но к сожалению сама концепция ВДВ под вопросом, в связи с совершенством средств ПВО, в том числе переносных. Транспортный самолет просто не зайдет в место высадки десанта. Но если будет решен вопрос с прохождением ПВО и сбросом десанта - такие войска могут перерезать коммуникации, совершить диверсии, глубокие рейды и вообще доставить очень много неприятностей противнику.
The Russians are increasingly making such vehicles, where the engine is in the front.. Seriously. They are now literally in war production. Factories work day and night, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. And they have dozens, if not hundreds of such factories. They try all the variants. And those that perform well in training and even in combat conditions in Ukraine will enter regular production..
Last gen BMP/BMD have triplet armament: 100mm low ballistic rifled bore cannon/ATGM launcher, 30mm high ballistic cannon and 7,62 mm machine gun. 300 rpm or so must be 30mm cannon.
What about him? It has a T-90, 125 mm tank gun on a nearly similar, if not identical, chassis to the BMD-4. It also has amphibious capabilities, as well as the ability to drop everything with a crew by special parachutes directly onto the battlefield. It has weak armor, but makes up for it with its excellent maneuverability and high firepower. The Russians call it a "light tank", which it is to some extent.
You guys should cancel the BMD series and just focus on making more BMP-3's. Airborne operations arn't going to be a thing for you guys in a long time.
why does Russia keep manufacturing old equipment instead of their new equipment designs?? *>edit~//- I fully support Russia and Putin, VIVA Mother Russia🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺-//~*
Vean los PZH 2000 motorizados Alemanes en Ucrania, quedaron inútiles por falta de repuesto, sufrieron "rápidos" desgaste y no soportaron duro "trabajo"
pretty impressive firepower for an airborne vehicle
Very impressive design & firepower for a small vehicle......
Great car ! She showed herself well in battles
No it hasnt it gets hit by 2 40 mm grenades and it goes up like petrol bomb
@@jeffreyprezalar220 yes off course. no military vehicle is invincible. Just like the flop F35 keeps falling out of the sky
@@lexburen5932😂😂😂💀💀💀💀
@@jeffreyprezalar220it holds better than burning abrams cemetery in ukraine
@@jeffreyprezalar220of course it does, it's armor is basically the same grade as standard issue body armor, that is to say, stops 7,62 nato on a good day, if even that
I love it 😍😍😍😍😍
From Indonesian🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
Вещь!!!👍👍👍✊
Браћо са вама смо Србија Русија браћа заувек
Excelente vehículo
🇲🇽🙏🇷🇺
❤️
I wish it incorporates 750 hp engine, APS, ERA Panels at the expense of it's overall weight (even upto 25 tonnes).
The heavier version already exist, it's BMP-3. BMD-4 has to remain light-weight to be air transportable and air droppable ;)
it is an air assault vehicle it is already having to shave weight everywhere it possibly can.
@@RiccardoTheBeAstyeah but it could be a bit heavier, as what is the likelihood of airborne troops having to cross a river or something bigger than what they could just drive through? And even if they came up to a river, wouldn't it be easier to hold the riverbank and wait for the enemy counterattack over it?
I want to see the video of an airdrop with the crew inside. That must be nerve wrecking.
The crew is not inside during an airdrop…
@@Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky Oh yes, "even with the crew inside the vehicle, truly a unique potential"!
@@Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky @Jari Norvanto is absolutely right..
Urraaaa.... From Indonesia 👍👍
Impressionnant 🤩👍
In this Gun Turret an 50 caliber Gattling gun type should also made to provide high volume high Firr Power to overwhelm enemy Defence with Secondary Air defence role inbuilt in it
It has a coaxial 50. Cal already doesn't it?
7,62x54mmr, wich is more than enough to chew up infantry.
50 cal is redundant as it has a 30mm autocanon. 50 cal is a "neither here nor there" caliber anyway.
@@henrik_worst_of_sinners fair I thought it was 12,7 mm side cannon. But the more I think about it, it wouldn't make any sense since they already have a 30 mm automatic anti-material cannon.
Looking away from it's unusability, 50 caliber barrel length, but what caliber? 12,7mm? 20mm? 30mm? 127mm? 406mm?
@@norbertaronvarga5361 the .50 caliber is exclusively 12,7mm. Therefore all the cannon diameters you listed don't apply. 406 mm is a WW2 naval gun type battery. It's ludicrous to call that a .50 cal. No the .50 BMG is 12,7mm pistol, rifle, MG all same diameter
🇧🇷❤️🇷🇺
Will see more of this on the battle front...
The engineer is asking hey how many guns should the turret have designer says yes guns😂
i wonder what that big cut out in the rear hull is for? probably for the airdrop equipment though it seems like a huge space sacrifice so their would have to be a very good reason for it on a vehicle that had to shave as much weight as possible and where space is at an absolute prmium even more then other AFVs. also the fact most versions can be airlifted and not actually dropped is interesting. as far as i can tell the Russians are the only people who have an actually viable airdropped IFV (though this if more a fire support vehicle). the best the Germans ever made was the Wesel a tiny fire support vehicle little more then a self-propelled 20mm autocannon or tow launcher (and it had to chose one or the other). and the Americans gave us the terribly flawed M551 Sheridan that tried too hard to be a tank and was insanely complex while also having armour so thin as to be pointless. Its interesting when you think about it as the Hind is also unique in that it is effectively a Flying IFV.
You can play for free now in War Thunder! War Thunder is a free-to-play vehicular combat multiplayer video game developed and published by Gaijin Entertainment.
Inovasi dan desain yang luar biasa
I hit the Bell
These vehicles need aps badly
Not a Bradley, but not too bad...
Sra, a cuánto cada uno ??
Это великолепные машины, но к сожалению сама концепция ВДВ под вопросом, в связи с совершенством средств ПВО, в том числе переносных. Транспортный самолет просто не зайдет в место высадки десанта.
Но если будет решен вопрос с прохождением ПВО и сбросом десанта - такие войска могут перерезать коммуникации, совершить диверсии, глубокие рейды и вообще доставить очень много неприятностей противнику.
Bundan sonra 😎
Light but has heavy weapons
how about making an btr that is longer and taller than the btr-mdm and based on the bmp-3 chassis
На заставке и на кадрах с выставки в ролике - 4 без М.
where do you put the INFANTRY
I have the same question, no clue.
Behind the gun / auto loader
@@mbtenjoyer9487 where are the doors to the compartment? Is te one on top just behind the turret?
@@Otaku.Pilot-99 behind the turret it’s kinda like a hatch
Xe này chỉ để yểm trợ lính dù thôi còn chở quân là btr bmd
Please do not amazed if TNI AL(INDONESIAN MARINES)Use this Tank for amphibious assault ☺ 💪👍
Thats BMP...this is for airborne troops
US doesn't have something like this
It would be better to move the engine to the front.
The Russians are increasingly making such vehicles, where the engine is in the front.. Seriously. They are now literally in war production. Factories work day and night, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. And they have dozens, if not hundreds of such factories. They try all the variants. And those that perform well in training and even in combat conditions in Ukraine will enter regular production..
tanque aerotransportado , bien
Harris Forges
На экспорт могут делать, а для себя нет?)
Barang ini bagus buat airbone drop didaerah rawan papua yg gk bisa d akses jalur darat...
Kelton Falls
It doesn't it doesn't matter the capability of the vehicle if the crew isn't trained.
A few of these could give most Western tanks a bad day. Rapid fire 100mm would be devastating from sides or rear.
The 100mm gun is low velocity and can't fire traditional anti-tank munitions, but it doubles as a launcher for ATGMs.
Littel Road
105mm Canon best
According the video clip the 100mm gun got a firing rate of at least 300 rpm. Not really 10 rpm as stated by the narrator.
That's the 30mm firing at 300 rpm, not the 100mm main gun.
Last gen BMP/BMD have triplet armament: 100mm low ballistic rifled bore cannon/ATGM launcher, 30mm high ballistic cannon and 7,62 mm machine gun. 300 rpm or so must be 30mm cannon.
Orn Trafficway
Celestine Oval
Fahey Canyon
😉👍❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🤙
Proyección
Becker Road
🇩🇿❤️🇷🇺
Sprut tank??
What about him? It has a T-90, 125 mm tank gun on a nearly similar, if not identical, chassis to the BMD-4. It also has amphibious capabilities, as well as the ability to drop everything with a crew by special parachutes directly onto the battlefield. It has weak armor, but makes up for it with its excellent maneuverability and high firepower. The Russians call it a "light tank", which it is to some extent.
@@ilijaspasojevic7031 I am saying isn't both of them the same thing
You guys should cancel the BMD series and just focus on making more BMP-3's.
Airborne operations arn't going to be a thing for you guys in a long time.
😃
why does Russia keep manufacturing old equipment instead of their new equipment designs??
*>edit~//- I fully support Russia and Putin, VIVA Mother Russia🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺-//~*
Потому что Россия делает оружие для реальной и тяжёлой работы, а не для циркового шоу с клоунами.
That should be... We all see what happens to old cold war era systems in Ukraine.
This isn't old. Is different from older BMPs. It is made for air dropped units.
The equipment inside is more important. They are the latest
Vean los PZH 2000 motorizados Alemanes en Ucrania, quedaron inútiles por falta de repuesto, sufrieron "rápidos" desgaste y no soportaron duro "trabajo"
🇷🇺💪💪💪
Armour should be improved
How does this help you in Ukraine?
It transports soldiers.
Anti america