@@threeamigoshk Yes i do and I also have the Canon R their first edition into the mirrorless pond. I have shot some baby pictures and man the colors pop and very crisp...I'm perfectly happy with this camera
Canon color science, doesn't disappoint for sure! I am hoping to do some wildlife and portraits in the coming days to get a good grip on the features of this camera 😁
I'm confused basically I have plan of getting R6 mark 2 just 4 months used with RF 24-105 4L and RF 100 2.8 + 256 GB card 300MB/s In 3465 USD. On the other hand R5mark2 is 4265 USD. I also don't have any lens. There are 2 options first is buy the 2 lens with R62 or 2nd option is R52 with Rf50 1.8... later on I'll upgrade my lens 24-105.. is it worth to sacrifice more money. I want 4,5 years future safe. If you're in my place what you'll do?? Is it good offer or suggest me any other option!! I don't have any gear now .. I used to have 5dmark3 in 2016... But I changed my field as currently working in the restaurant business industry. I want to target small restaurants and small businesses for social media and products photography, as I have planned to give free 30 sec, 1 min reels for Snapchat, tiktok and Instagram. Just to build my portfolio on Instagram and other platforms. Plus I'll do street photography as I'm living an expat in Saudi Arabia. I belong to Pakistan.@@richmal50
Currently testing it, somehow not sure if i am seeing this but 4k60p sraw is considerably sharper than 4k60 raw , currently researching why this might be. I actually like the 4k60p sraw somehow 😅
thats the thing at standard no log, it looks muddy to me compared to 4k sraw.. which is making me scratch my head, my understanding is like yours that 4k sraw is downsampled /lineskip but if you didn't tell me which one is which.. i would say the 4k sraw looks oversampled to me! which is crazy.. I will share a short tonight to show this, will let you know once is up
@@truthseeker6804 ua-cam.com/users/shortsee4FnBUbDeU just posted a short on this. You can see the Sraw is sharper than 4k 60 standard neutral profile but has some moire (standard profile looks okay but a bit muddy from what i can see) while 4k fine (being oversampled) has a better sharpness and quality.
Definitely is lol.. I do wonder how much it affects to be honest, I will test the 4k 60 and let you know, maybe is not noticeable and it wont matter ( thats all i can hope 😅)
Yes it was worth it for me to buy this camera
I couldn't agree more. Did you also had the Mark I ?
@@threeamigoshk Yes i do and I also have the Canon R their first edition into the mirrorless pond. I have shot some baby pictures and man the colors pop and very crisp...I'm perfectly happy with this camera
Canon color science, doesn't disappoint for sure! I am hoping to do some wildlife and portraits in the coming days to get a good grip on the features of this camera 😁
I'm confused basically I have plan of getting R6 mark 2
just 4 months used with RF 24-105 4L and RF 100 2.8 + 256 GB card 300MB/s
In 3465 USD. On the other hand R5mark2 is 4265 USD. I also don't have any lens.
There are 2 options first is buy the 2 lens with R62 or
2nd option is R52 with Rf50 1.8... later on I'll upgrade my lens 24-105.. is it worth to sacrifice more money. I want 4,5 years future safe. If you're in my place what you'll do??
Is it good offer or suggest me any other option!!
I don't have any gear now .. I used to have 5dmark3 in 2016... But I changed my field as currently working in the restaurant business industry. I want to target small restaurants and small businesses for social media and products photography, as I have planned to give free 30 sec, 1 min reels for Snapchat, tiktok and Instagram. Just to build my portfolio on Instagram and other platforms. Plus I'll do street photography as I'm living an expat in Saudi Arabia. I belong to Pakistan.@@richmal50
i read in sraw 4k60p is downsampled
Currently testing it, somehow not sure if i am seeing this but 4k60p sraw is considerably sharper than 4k60 raw , currently researching why this might be. I actually like the 4k60p sraw somehow 😅
@@threeamigoshk randomly deciding what to downsample and lineskip. check standard neutral profile no log.
thats the thing at standard no log, it looks muddy to me compared to 4k sraw.. which is making me scratch my head, my understanding is like yours that 4k sraw is downsampled /lineskip but if you didn't tell me which one is which.. i would say the 4k sraw looks oversampled to me! which is crazy.. I will share a short tonight to show this, will let you know once is up
@@truthseeker6804 ua-cam.com/users/shortsee4FnBUbDeU just posted a short on this. You can see the Sraw is sharper than 4k 60 standard neutral profile but has some moire (standard profile looks okay but a bit muddy from what i can see) while 4k fine (being oversampled) has a better sharpness and quality.
Is the 4k 60 line skipped?
Unfortunately it is, which is an odd one.. it can do 8k 60 but 4k 60 it cant. 😅? I
@@threeamigoshk lol. Typical Canon move. Still a great camera though.
Definitely is lol.. I do wonder how much it affects to be honest, I will test the 4k 60 and let you know, maybe is not noticeable and it wont matter ( thats all i can hope 😅)