Your views, clicks and money ALL make instantaneous thoughts and feelings to be available to companies immediately. Remember that. Stop watching, stop supporting and unsubscribe to be heard
And what about the taxis on Thursday playtime paid for by ITV? Even the chair woman at the end said to McCall I have to ask these questions otherwise I wouldn’t be doing my job!!! What a joke she was scared of her.
I was bullied as a child and it really hindered and harmed my development. I went on to university and developed an eating disorder because I couldn’t cope in a social environment with new people because my association of people had been built to be that of cruelty and sadism. I don’t believe a word these bosses say. They clearly don’t deserve their positions. I hope they get what’s coming to them and those who were bullied get justiceZ
Really disappointed in the line of questioning from the panel apart from the guy from N Ireland as he was the only one who’s questions made McCall squirm. They allowed her to take over and run the show and waste time by rambling on. I’m an auditor so used to things similar to this and most of this panel were far too soft and almost scared of her. No real evidence supplied, all good talk from ITV and hearsay. Policies and procedures all all very well but were they adhered to?
It’s so rewarding to watch these Bullies squirming, but unfortunately these fools aren’t the only ‘management’ bullying their staff. Strip McCall of her ‘Damehood’ and position and soon. Whoever granted her this needs their head examined.
So if everything was fine, nobody knew nothing, there wasn't evidence... why the runner was asked if he had a relationship with Phillip 12 times?? (minute 11:14) And at the minute 17:10 she called the runner "the child was present"... they knew it and they covered it! And if the runner is using Phillip's lawyers to help him, we will never know what really happened... Minute 19:30 she says, "everybody who knew something could anonymously say something", well Ruth and Dan did it and you didn't listen either! Minute 23:18: why would you continue providing the runner care even after leaving ITV? I wonder if they care so much about all the runners that work for the show... ITV is so generous! They really think that we will believe them...
So what’s the answer to the first question????? I have never listened to such a nothing word salad in all my life. What a waste of time. They got the answers they wanted !! So why was the young man transferred????
The head of TV is arrogant. Specifically after her last comment. She would not take responsibility for anything throughout this investigation. I hope she gets sacked.
CAROLYN was so nervous she drank a gallon of LIQUID and as for kevin well he was all over the place and it was the blonde bird that carried them both 😅😅😅 kevin and CAROLYN need to resign Jesus christ 😅
What I can't understand is why was 'person x' receiving 'a whole series of duty of care' support because of rumours even when they have accepted that the rumours weren't true and person x himself has told them they weren't true.
That is, I get that he needed the support because he was so upset by the intrusion, but their 'duty of care ' should have led them to a much more serious investigation particularly as they were 'alledgedly ' paying for taxis for person x to travel to the studios from Phillip's flat on Friday mornings. Did they not query why he has to travel in from Phillip's London home on Friday mornings when he obviously would have travelled to work, under his own steam, the other 4 days a week. Do all junior staff get taxis paid for to come into work?
I think it was pure luck that this producer took pity on the runner and kept in touch with him - which they are now saying was part of their duty care package.
Hogwash. She refers to an escalation 3 years ago but took no real action. I can't listen to this whitewashing, they too are guilty by proxy. Who does the hiring & firing on the programme? We know Schofield exerted pressure as so many suddenly left. He came out because the teenager tried to sell his story to the newspapers. This is not a grilling or even an enquiry, many people from the show complained & were ignored. Why wasn't a private eye hired to get to the truth, they were seen out together regularly. Sack them. Why was the teen moved to another show without reason. Self serving politics to maintain the status quo. Sack them all.
The strict procedures are for the cameras and the MPs. The reality is different. I worked for another company at the lowest level. When I was a subject of sexual impropriety and complained about this, they got rid of me. There is no one to protect you.
I keep going back to an Oscar discussion panel led by Piers Morgan where Joan Collins said she was confused as to why Phillip had suddenly come out as gay as ‘we all knew for a long time’ (sic). Perez Hilton started to tell her of rumours of inappropriate behaviour but was cut off by Piers. So at the very least it was known for a while that he was gay. There is footage of him having a meal with the young man when he looks under 18 by a UA-camr called Jack Jones celebrating a million followers & he has recently said Phillip begged him not to air the video as it could ruin his career! Something is not right & I can’t believe that Holly ‘his bff’ didn’t know. This runner appeared on stage at an award show- surely that’s not usual?
The very fact employees do not speak freely, speaks volumes. Having multiple systems where people can go to speak freely, speaks volumes. Already sounds toxic 🤮 respect all your staff at any level. I can imagine the ‘tower block Tracey’s’ as the demographic for TM also speaks volumes. If you don’t look after your minions you have no foundation.
I didn't believe a word carolyn said or Kevin 😅 especially kevin 😅 but you could so tell when kyla spoke she was SO NERVOUS AND UNCOMFORTABLE that she was going to fk up? Get the body experts on this PATHETICNESS 😅
an age old tactic, you are asked a simple question, in answer just talk for as long as possible about anything, and that takes up any time to be asked more questions, sturgeon was a master at the game
We are the bosses and we know what’s right. Ah ok then. The end, sod the little guys and gals .. they must know the public don’t fall for this kind of bullsh*t anymore? I don’t understand why they would expect someone to have evidence? The concerns for a minor should be enough for Them to investigate and find the evidence. As she said herself they didn’t ask them outright because they put Philips duty of care BEFORE a minors well-being when he was being groomed. They have been taught very cleverly how to talk the talk. The chair should be bringing them back to reality here and she isn’t
They take no responsibility for anything, disgusting people, not at all nice people, they are cold and you can imagine how bullying goes on in itv, you won't catch me watching them anymore
Did we watch the same show? They aren’t there to be warm. They stated policy. What would you have done differently after being lied to 12 times with no evidence and potentially malicious rumours.
I’m only watching Netflix, Amazon Prime and social media, sometimes Channel4 and Channel5. I do not think I’ll support a system I consider deeply unethical and careless when it comes to mental health. It’s so obvious what they’re doing. Why no mental health professionals were involved in this inquiry? Why Bullism is never discussed with politicians and corporate leaders in the presence of psychologists, mental health experts or counselors? Experts in the field of psychology who can describe bully/toxic behavior and its impact on people from a professional point of view, to make sure that problems are properly dealt with and not hidden or ignored hanging onto duty of care corporate procedures? ….So sad …
Meanwhile, the rest of us underlings who have been severely bullied by HR get no concern for our welfare, no support - nothing! 😡 Og the privilege on view here is obvious!
Interesting how they all have links with ITV. Not sure why McCall said they would have investigated had they had a complaint, only there wasn't any; thought Ruth Langsford made one specifically about the runner.
Full committee has conflicts of interests LOL Nothing wrong there - we're all waiting on hospitality from ITV - I wonder why ITV gave hospitality to MPs?
So arrogant. We listen, but at the end of the day what we say goes. If I was Mrs Flavk I would be feeling incredibly dis-respected right now. Arrogance at its best. Made an absolute laughing stock of the chairwoman right to the very end.
I am sincerely not impressed with the lip service and word salad. Why is there no paperwork/evidence to back up what Dame Carolyn is saying? The surveys conducted...where is the physical evidence/ proof/analysis of these surveys? If Person X stated he was a family friend, why was this not looked into thoroughly/checked and confirmed before appointing him- considering his young age? Kyla in one breath states she did not speak to person X but later contradicts herself. Why is Caroline Dineage chair of this meeting? Does this lady have responsibilty for the Online Safety Bill? How much is this costing TaxPayers? Why is this getting 'looked into' by our MPS and not a Public Independent Body? Why are the MPs not putting their attention on vaccine harms, illegal migrants etc? Blaming the drop in Share Prices on Covid and Ukraine.... I like John Nicolson's questioning; he clearly went off script.🕊
Skilled at avoiding the truth and worming out of difficult questions. General statements. Give examples of other runners who were given show reels, work placements and a place on the stage at awards ceremonies. I suppose they can't because NO ONE was given preferential treatment like this and the response I wouldn't know just doesn't cut it. What would happen if staff didn't want to work overtime for good will to make a show reel for Phillip's young friend , would Phillip get them the sack. ITV bosses/ producers like Frizell were most likely unapproachable and for some unfathomable reason Schofield was allowed to run the show without recourse. Bosses are gaslighting to save their own skins. Questioning should have been tougher.
U are telling loads of lies Carolyns pluss Holly lived in his pocket The young fellow was at awards with philip &Holly she must knew a lot things As for u only 5 years u cant handle ur job this morning closed down 1st of all 😪🫣🇬🇧
Video headline is wrong, it is not grilled but word should "ITV CEO coddle by MPs". Where is the harsh questioning? ITV management knew when the "person x" was being ferried around scum PS home and around the city on their dime. Any competent company will keep a tab on their financials else they deserve to go bankrupt, also when person x was "promoted" when the scandal was about to be exposed the first time means that company wanted to keep a lid on it.
I think everybody is making something out if nothing, a lot of people build work relationships, cos they spend most of their times at work, we would all be out of a job if we all gor sacked for that, just keep your romantic relationships outside work and keep it professional at work and everything will be fine!
SORRY ask child if anything happened them they say no ask that' child 20 years later they tell u a different story so the older person gets help this is a joke
All of their pants are on fire 🔥! We're no further forward and Person X will continue to suffer. Shame on the committee and shame on ITV. Bring on Carol McGiffen and Eamonn Holmes.
You won't see me watching this morning anytime soon or watching any TV channel especially itv and BBC
Your views, clicks and money ALL make instantaneous thoughts and feelings to be available to companies immediately. Remember that. Stop watching, stop supporting and unsubscribe to be heard
So why was Ruth fired after she alarmed you guys?
They know why!!
It was over a different matter not the Philip Schofield & Person X
The panel should have asked why "Person X" was front and centre on stage when This Morning won an award? Do all runners get such opportunities?
And what about the taxis on Thursday playtime paid for by ITV? Even the chair woman at the end said to McCall I have to ask these questions otherwise I wouldn’t be doing my job!!! What a joke she was scared of her.
WE INVESTIGATED OURSELVES AND FOUND NOTHING WRONG🙄THIS MATTER REQUIRES👮♂🚔INVESTIGATION.
I was bullied as a child and it really hindered and harmed my development. I went on to university and developed an eating disorder because I couldn’t cope in a social environment with new people because my association of people had been built to be that of cruelty and sadism. I don’t believe a word these bosses say. They clearly don’t deserve their positions. I hope they get what’s coming to them and those who were bullied get justiceZ
Really disappointed in the line of questioning from the panel apart from the guy from N Ireland as he was the only one who’s questions made McCall squirm. They allowed her to take over and run the show and waste time by rambling on. I’m an auditor so used to things similar to this and most of this panel were far too soft and almost scared of her. No real evidence supplied, all good talk from ITV and hearsay. Policies and procedures all all very well but were they adhered to?
Loved watching her squirm and attitude of a Private School prim and proper and the Highrise Tracys was amazing !! Wouldn't put it past them
Where is the minutes of the meeting
Are we to now go down the route of hearsay
Or
This is My Truth
What is this!?!
Who’s paying for this?
Totally agree felt like a PR exercise for them
Yup, ITV walked away feeling they were no match for us huh
COUGH COUGH ……BS……. The whole panel is lying 😮💨😮💨 watch how they talk !
It’s so rewarding to watch these Bullies squirming, but unfortunately these fools aren’t the only ‘management’ bullying their staff. Strip McCall of her ‘Damehood’ and position and soon. Whoever granted her this needs their head examined.
So if everything was fine, nobody knew nothing, there wasn't evidence... why the runner was asked if he had a relationship with Phillip 12 times?? (minute 11:14) And at the minute 17:10 she called the runner "the child was present"... they knew it and they covered it! And if the runner is using Phillip's lawyers to help him, we will never know what really happened... Minute 19:30 she says, "everybody who knew something could anonymously say something", well Ruth and Dan did it and you didn't listen either! Minute 23:18: why would you continue providing the runner care even after leaving ITV? I wonder if they care so much about all the runners that work for the show... ITV is so generous! They really think that we will believe them...
We don't believe them. They are all covering up. Speaks volumes.
But the people that came forward saying everybody knew, why didn't they say anything at that time, why wait till now?!!!😅
@@callyodmedia2 They did! That's why the enquiry was triggered. Are you not listening. Jobs were lost for speaking up.
She said ‘HR was present’ not ‘the child was present’!
Both Person X & PS denied the affair he was 20 years old when it started
So what’s the answer to the first question?????
I have never listened to such a nothing word salad in all my life. What a waste of time.
They got the answers they wanted !!
So why was the young man transferred????
She directly addressed it after her long winded self introduction. What is your attention span
The head of TV is arrogant. Specifically after her last comment. She would not take responsibility for anything throughout this investigation. I hope she gets sacked.
CAROLYN was so nervous she drank a gallon of LIQUID and as for kevin well he was all over the place and it was the blonde bird that carried them both 😅😅😅 kevin and CAROLYN need to resign Jesus christ 😅
What I can't understand is why was 'person x' receiving 'a whole series of duty of care' support because of rumours even when they have accepted that the rumours weren't true and person x himself has told them they weren't true.
That is, I get that he needed the support because he was so upset by the intrusion, but their 'duty of care ' should have led them to a much more serious investigation particularly as they were 'alledgedly ' paying for taxis for person x to travel to the studios from Phillip's flat on Friday mornings. Did they not query why he has to travel in from Phillip's London home on Friday mornings when he obviously would have travelled to work, under his own steam, the other 4 days a week. Do all junior staff get taxis paid for to come into work?
I think it was pure luck that this producer took pity on the runner and kept in touch with him - which they are now saying was part of their duty care package.
u mean matthew mcgreavey
Do runners get invited to the national television awards 😅😅😅😅 and sit? In this morning crowd 😆 🤣 😂 did yhe other runners get invited???
What a great first question 👍🙈
What a waste of time and money. McCall is incredibly arrogant and ITV unaccountable.
She sacked anyone that spoke up, Ruth Eamonn. Dr ranj stopped going on the program because of it. Dan whooton got sacked for speaking up.
Groomer and his enablers
Their explanation of external investigation by a employee within their own establishment be it a manager or not is comical
Hogwash. She refers to an escalation 3 years ago but took no real action. I can't listen to this whitewashing, they too are guilty by proxy. Who does the hiring & firing on the programme? We know Schofield exerted pressure as so many suddenly left. He came out because the teenager tried to sell his story to the newspapers. This is not a grilling or even an enquiry, many people from the show complained & were ignored. Why wasn't a private eye hired to get to the truth, they were seen out together regularly. Sack them. Why was the teen moved to another show without reason. Self serving politics to maintain the status quo. Sack them all.
Usual misleading answers. They knew!
Was..... There an actual question asked.....answered with out B S .....😒
fire the dame take away knighthood has no deserving qualities to be called a Dame in front of her name
80% of them don't... nothing impressive in having the title nowadays
The strict procedures are for the cameras and the MPs. The reality is different. I worked for another company at the lowest level. When I was a subject of sexual impropriety and complained about this, they got rid of me. There is no one to protect you.
“Grilled” by MPs? 🐂💩
I keep going back to an Oscar discussion panel led by Piers Morgan where Joan Collins said she was confused as to why Phillip had suddenly come out as gay as ‘we all knew for a long time’ (sic). Perez Hilton started to tell her of rumours of inappropriate behaviour but was cut off by Piers. So at the very least it was known for a while that he was gay. There is footage of him having a meal with the young man when he looks under 18 by a UA-camr called Jack Jones celebrating a million followers & he has recently said Phillip begged him not to air the video as it could ruin his career! Something is not right & I can’t believe that Holly ‘his bff’ didn’t know. This runner appeared on stage at an award show- surely that’s not usual?
He was 19 in that video it was taken in 2015 MM is now 27 he does look younger but he was over 18 not underage
@@caroleoneill2872Have you seen the video? He looks like a kid.
And yet we voted in a Prime Minister who has no idea how many children he has. This hand wringing nonsense by the MP's is a waste of tax payers money.
They can't synthese for us they have to spew out all of that higeribiggy speech
Lady in green dress said her dad was a ex presenter of This morning?
Let’s let the Scottish MP run the external investigation, he was fierce - unlike some of the dabblers on there.
I hope the MPs delve deeper and bring some of the ex workers who ITV got rid off cos big bosses didn't like whar they said
The very fact employees do not speak freely, speaks volumes. Having multiple systems where people can go to speak freely, speaks volumes. Already sounds toxic 🤮 respect all your staff at any level. I can imagine the ‘tower block Tracey’s’ as the demographic for TM also speaks volumes. If you don’t look after your minions you have no foundation.
Because if you only have a single stream for speaking up and someone finds that method uncomfortable that’s not good enough.
7 out of 12 of this ‘Committee’ ( talking Shop ). Have worked directly for itv except the’ Chairwoman’ whose daddy worked for it 🙄.
Bias or what. All part of the gang.
Nothing to see here 🤥
I didn't believe a word carolyn said or Kevin 😅 especially kevin 😅 but you could so tell when kyla spoke she was SO NERVOUS AND UNCOMFORTABLE that she was going to fk up? Get the body experts on this PATHETICNESS 😅
an age old tactic, you are asked a simple question, in answer just talk for as long as possible about anything, and that takes up any time to be asked more questions, sturgeon was a master at the game
Everybody is working hard. What does that mean?
lol we said to person x you can do this anonymously, she doesn't even hear her own words
What about piers Morgan for telling truth and miss dame Carolyn firing him on direction on miss Meghan?..
Where's all the paperwork for the reviews????
exactly... lies... that's all this was. One can only hope the rumors that he comes back are not true...
What a sham!
I don’t understand how there is rumours of a relationship between Phil and person X but no evidence. Where did the rumours stem from then
She is lying threw her teeth. She is going around the question
Bullshit they were just trying to save there golden boy
We are the bosses and we know what’s right. Ah ok then. The end, sod the little guys and gals .. they must know the public don’t fall for this kind of bullsh*t anymore?
I don’t understand why they would expect someone to have evidence? The concerns for a minor should be enough for Them to investigate and find the evidence. As she said herself they didn’t ask them outright because they put Philips duty of care BEFORE a minors well-being when he was being groomed. They have been taught very cleverly how to talk the talk. The chair should be bringing them back to reality here and she isn’t
They take no responsibility for anything, disgusting people, not at all nice people, they are cold and you can imagine how bullying goes on in itv, you won't catch me watching them anymore
Did we watch the same show? They aren’t there to be warm. They stated policy. What would you have done differently after being lied to 12 times with no evidence and potentially malicious rumours.
She needs to go
Oh?.."YAWN!"... Lady in the green dress, get on with the grilling!
What a load of baloney. 🇺🇸
Wonder where my comments went? Screen recorded though…..👀👀
Mr. Nicelso... What a guy!!!
Who is he ?
I love it when that Irish chap comes down on McColl. She reminds me of the grand high witch.
I’m only watching Netflix, Amazon Prime and social media, sometimes Channel4 and Channel5.
I do not think I’ll support a system I consider deeply unethical and careless when it comes to mental health. It’s so obvious what they’re doing.
Why no mental health professionals were involved in this inquiry?
Why Bullism is never discussed with politicians and corporate leaders in the presence of psychologists, mental health experts or counselors? Experts in the field of psychology who can describe bully/toxic behavior and its impact on people from a professional point of view, to make sure that problems are properly dealt with and not hidden or ignored hanging onto duty of care corporate procedures? ….So sad …
Meanwhile, the rest of us underlings who have been severely bullied by HR get no concern for our welfare, no support - nothing! 😡 Og the privilege on view here is obvious!
Any one who complained or aired their concerns got the sack so thus the rest of staff are afraid to speak out
Both parties said no and anything else is slander aside from that.
Interesting how they all have links with ITV. Not sure why McCall said they would have investigated had they had a complaint, only there wasn't any; thought Ruth Langsford made one specifically about the runner.
Ruth and dan came forward and were given the boot x
Phillip came out because he knew that his affair was going to be big news
Hogwash of a whitewash
Full committee has conflicts of interests LOL Nothing wrong there - we're all waiting on hospitality from ITV - I wonder why ITV gave hospitality to MPs?
Lies r unbelievable by adults, should be ashamed of youself
So as per usual just another Cover up, oh my god where is the sick bags
So arrogant. We listen, but at the end of the day what we say goes. If I was Mrs Flavk I would be feeling incredibly dis-respected right now. Arrogance at its best. Made an absolute laughing stock of the chairwoman right to the very end.
I am sincerely not impressed with the lip service and word salad.
Why is there no paperwork/evidence to back up what Dame Carolyn is saying?
The surveys conducted...where is the physical evidence/ proof/analysis of these surveys?
If Person X stated he was a family friend, why was this not looked into thoroughly/checked and confirmed before appointing him- considering his young age?
Kyla in one breath states she did not speak to person X but later contradicts herself.
Why is Caroline Dineage chair of this meeting? Does this lady have responsibilty for the Online Safety Bill?
How much is this costing TaxPayers?
Why is this getting 'looked into' by our MPS and not a Public Independent Body?
Why are the MPs not putting their attention on vaccine harms, illegal migrants etc?
Blaming the drop in Share Prices on Covid and Ukraine....
I like John Nicolson's questioning; he clearly went off script.🕊
Holly must have known her and Phillip were thick as thieves.shes just saving her own career
I counted 8 all having been paid or are pId by ITV!!!!DODGY
WHY HASNT ANYONE MENTIONED THE VERY SERIOUS ALLEGATION OF GROOMING… helloooo…..
Simply because there was none
This is NOT an independent enquiry 8 out 12 have all received money hospitality from itv. JOKE!!!! Including chair
Skilled at avoiding the truth and worming out of difficult questions. General statements. Give examples of other runners who were given show reels, work placements and a place on the stage at awards ceremonies. I suppose they can't because NO ONE was given preferential treatment like this and the response I wouldn't know just doesn't cut it. What would happen if staff didn't want to work overtime for good will to make a show reel for Phillip's young friend , would Phillip get them the sack. ITV bosses/ producers like Frizell were most likely unapproachable and for some unfathomable reason Schofield was allowed to run the show without recourse.
Bosses are gaslighting to save their own skins. Questioning should have been tougher.
What is the name of the chairwoman? Thanks
Has she been inhaling a heluim balloon 🎈...
Lygo is contradicting himself pmsl
Lol yes just you two didn't know your a joke. 😂
Shame
Girl behind Kevin looks mad as hell. Who is she?
Itv are a joke and thats why me and more people are not watch TV anymore and have not for years.
U are telling loads of lies Carolyns pluss Holly lived in his pocket The young fellow was at awards with philip &Holly she must knew a lot things As for u only 5 years u cant handle ur job this morning closed down
1st of all 😪🫣🇬🇧
Lie after Lie
One big cover up
Video headline is wrong, it is not grilled but word should "ITV CEO coddle by MPs". Where is the harsh questioning? ITV management knew when the "person x" was being ferried around scum PS home and around the city on their dime. Any competent company will keep a tab on their financials else they deserve to go bankrupt, also when person x was "promoted" when the scandal was about to be exposed the first time means that company wanted to keep a lid on it.
is she still getting paid £3000/ hour while she's here ? that's £6000 luverly juberly a nice little earner
I think everybody is making something out if nothing, a lot of people build work relationships, cos they spend most of their times at work, we would all be out of a job if we all gor sacked for that, just keep your romantic relationships outside work and keep it professional at work and everything will be fine!
He was person x underage and groomed by Phillip
@@karenlauricella4976 He was not underage nor did he groom him
Solute ab….Boks..low….
SORRY ask child if anything happened them they say no ask that' child 20 years later they tell u a different story so the older person gets help this is a joke
He was not a child the relationship began when MM was 20 years old
All of their pants are on fire 🔥! We're no further forward and Person X will continue to suffer. Shame on the committee and shame on ITV. Bring on Carol McGiffen and Eamonn Holmes.
Bullcrap