If we took into account that C1 is the note he was sure of and he used in live choral singing, this comes insane... He probably could hit Bb0 for fun at good day
@@JAC0B_BASS, I am sure his quiet notes could have probably gone even lower than G0. I can only project down to A1 (E1 is my lowest chest note, but not loud enough for a choir), but I am good to B0 with a little bit of fry in a small venue and solo. Imagine if he had learned and decided to use subharmonics! I can reach Eb0 with subharmonics and Zlatopolsky's voice makes me sound like a tenor, lol.
@@lurecyyy between full voice and strohbass theres a hearable difference. I mean when you switch from mod to strohbass you hear that it soubds different. Zlatopolsky did slide from A1 to D1 (we magnify) on one breath with the same volume and same overtones. Its just his voice. Amazing
@@lurecyyy as far as I know strohbass is modal. It’s simply a way of amplifying the note with the trade off of it being a far harsher sound. From what I understand most oktavist use this technique at a certain point.
@Hellcat Bass because physically it was. There are many moments like this one when he enters 0 octave by accident. (Voice cracks and accidential subharmonics)
Those letters refer to the piano buttons. There are notes on piano that start with C, D, E, F, G, A, B and there also the notes between like C# Eb, F#, G# etc. And each note has its frequency so when you for example hit a B3 on a piano, you just hear how high it is or, how low it is. Then you sing along as high or as low as the note is and you know which note you just sung. Shortly saying 😁
Natural notes////Sharps and flats (semitone above or below). C do. C# (do sharp) D re. Db (re flat) D# (re sharp) E mi. Eb (mi flat) F fa. F# (fa sharp) G sol. Gb (sol flat) G# (sol sharp) A la. Ab (la flat) A# (a sharp) B ti. Bb (ti flat)
I wanted to make it since months but I couldn't, finally someone made it, I wish they didn't wrote D1 - C1 instead of C#1 - B0 bc I listen C#1 - B0 I think
@@vocalsvideos458 generally it’s accepted as D1 - C1 as it goes with the key of the piece and it’s sort of pot luck as to what comes up on a tuner. Some people hear it closer to C#1 - B0 🤷♂️ incredible sound either way
Not impressed with how low he can go... I think you're confusing modal impostation of sound with subharmonics and fry. Don't mix the two. To hit a C2 or B1 with that much power and that much resonance and deepness isn't impressive? I would like to hear all these so called basses from accapella live and off mic. They would seem like tenors compared to Zlatopolsky. Most of the accappella ,,basses" are in fact baritones that get on mic and edit afterwards... On mic i have A1 but it sounds like a fart off mic... Just sayin'
Note at 5:59 is just a B1. The recording by Polyansky has no derivations from the written score as far as random oktaving. Also, I can hear him on the B. The F or so is just choral undertones by a well-tuned choir. Also structurally, it makes no sense for the oktavist to end a Russian orthodox piece on the fifth.
@wALkEr-gd9ff not sure what your point is. I wasn't taking about the note. I was asking him how he thought his Octavism skills measured up against the GOAT in general, not about a B1 😅
Talk about hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit. This man's voice is truly divine proof. Shudders my soul to hear him. Looking up all these pieces. ✨👏🏻🕊
Thank you! Thank you! This is a gem! 1:50 the same song Ort sings at "Basso Profondo and Oktavists" (The Oktavism Channel's one)? 2:52 Was that the performance where the singers next to Zlatopolsky were shaken for his voice?
1:50 yeah maybe. I was searching for that earlier but couldn’t find it. If I remember rightly Ort’s version is down to a Bb but I can’t remember off the top of my head 2:52 as far as I remember, there’s no specific performance that the person saying that credited, though I’m sure in most performances Zlatopolsky managed to rumble the people next to him
@@enocjordanabi4207 struggling? No... its powerful sound, Bb1 has never been a problem for him. Maybe its because of recording. Its don kosaken, sometimes zlatopolsky sounds very weird on their cds.
Funnily enough, Zlatopolsky never went lower than, say, Geoff Castellucci, but where Castellucci sounds smooth, soft, and quiet even through the compressor, Zlatopolsky is as loud as a ships horn.
Come on bro, don't think Zlatopolsky CAN'T go that low. What's Geoff's solid lowest note right now? A B0 from Halo Theme(not including brief growl/vocal fry), just half notes below C1, and what Zlatopolsky can do? Sing a C1 like a spaceship about to lift off. Zlapolsky could easily blast those so-called modern "extreme/inhuman" low notes if he wanted to.
Thank you so much finally someone did a vocal range to one of the best singers ever, can you add next to vocal range in the title something like, C1 - F4 (it's a B0 to me)
Yeah I reckon he could put it a bit further in both directions. Consider how amazing Glenn Miller is of an oktavist. In this radio interview he scrapes out a C1/B0 ua-cam.com/video/Aiy_8-7ZRwI/v-deo.html Zlatopolsky had to ability to PROJECT that over an entire choir. What an insane being. Absolute freak of nature
@@matthewdockray9745 glenn mixed it with fry... Still impressive obvously but you know. He showed on one video his lowest chest was barely singed E1. Of course I respect Glenn and he is an amazing low singer I just said it for those who didint know
I like how Mikhail's higher notes show his tonal color, which is more of a bass. No one think I'm actually calling him a bass please, ik he's an okatvist.
I mean, an oktavist is a bass. His vocal classification is a basso profundo, and his role in choral music is oktavist (octaving the bass line). Calling him a bass is completely ok, but I see why it causes problems considering some of the people called “basses” nowadays.
@@boundary2580 It's because majority of modern 'basses' are not natural basses, but rather manufactured basses. They developed that range but the actual voice by nature is not that of a bass. Mikhail is a real low bass. JD Sumner was more of a higher bass. You can hear quite a bit of a tone difference between the two. JD also smoked a lot so I suggest listening to his young voice for that.
@@KajiVocals i was more considering opera and choir than gospel singing. I would consider J.D. a “manufactured” bass as well considering his heavy smoking and naturally fry like voice. Also, I would call most gospel and “acapella” basses manufactured anyway because of the use of the microphone. Not saying he’s a bad bass, just not my taste. Glenn Miller is probably the best example of a true bass voice nowadays, and some of the greats from the past include Cesare Siepi, Ezio Pinza, Samuel Ramey, Hans Hotter, George London, and Kurt Moll. Obviously there are more even today, but those are the ones that I can think of off the top of my head. It’s not just the low notes, but the color and weight of the voice that makes a bass, and a lot of the guys I just named (even Miller at some point) could sing wonderful high Fs and even Gs through great technique. I’m not some kind of bass elitist, but I think it is regressive for some singers to label themselves as something that limits their potential. An example is Bryn Terfel, a ✌️ bass-baritone ✌️ who has wonderful high notes up to a high A but sings lower roles that he really doesn’t sound comfortable in. I think a part of the problem are the shifting definitions of what makes someone a certain voice type because of how high a lot of modern tenors are singing. In the past if you could sing a high G easy enough, you were a tenor. Heavy voice? You were a dramatic tenor. Dark tone? You were a baritone with a good high range. If seems so simple but people became obsessed with being classified as one thing or another and thus began singing roles that their voices just aren’t suited for.
Yeah it does sound a little... disappointing(?) in terms of power and sound. This is a link to the video which doesn’t really have any information on it ua-cam.com/video/clLvIbbwAqY/v-deo.html The site that I found it from listed it as Zlatopolsky’s voice, and Jay said when I was talking to him thathe did help with the creation of the thread on the site, so I’m not too sure. Might be worth asking him 🤷♂️ Thanks for watching
@Steven Criscione tbf his low range does sound quite inconsistent, though that may be more down to the volume he’s allowed to produce in certain dynamics in the music than his actual voice. I agree though that the B1 is strange
@@reubenthomas7907 I know what you mean, i immediately went with no.3 at first but the recording sounds too good to be as old as when Mikhail was younger (even if it was remastered). So, i'm probably thinking, simply not Mikhail. To be honest though, great B1, it's just not how Zlatopolsky would have sounded in my opinion.
@@GeorgeLifterMann ua-cam.com/video/5e9uPtu3wRY/v-deo.html listen after 3:14 , especially to the Ab1/G1 after 3:50 , Zlat was quite young, 36 at the time of this recording. Though definitely sounding like a Basso profondo, he doesnt sound like his usual self.
Mikhail Zlatopolsky has a fantastic voice. I read, that he can sing the C1 but is the C1 the lowest note of his vocal range or can he sing lower? The same question I would like to ask for the F4 is this the highest note of his vocal range? Another question I have is the following: Does anybody know a video, in which nobody else is singing but Mikhail Zlatopolsky or at least where he is singing a solo?
Okay So His lowest and highest RECORDED notes are in this video - the C1 and the F4. It is reported that he once sung a G4 but that was never recorded. He almost certainly had a falsetto range too but that also was never recorded (no need for a huge oktavist to ever be singing in the falsetto range). His C1 was projected over an entire choir, so he undoubtably would’ve been able to sing lower notes, tho with diminished power. I suspect he may have been able to scrape an A0 but this is just a guess. To hear him singing solo there are very few recordings, but ‘lullaby’ was a radio interview that featured just him singing and nobody else ua-cam.com/video/wqAQIuurGe8/v-deo.html
@@matthewdockray9745 Thank you for your answer. It is very unfortunate that his lowest note isn't recorded. But in spite of that I am really impressed of his voice. He can sing exactly two octaves lower than me but I can sing just one octave higher than him. Do you know his highest note in falsetto?
@@vielphantasie2549 I don't remember the video I've seen the comment in, it was like a year ago or more. I only remember, that it was written in russian language and the vid itself also was from some Russian community based chanel. Talking about Zlatopolsky's falsetto,I haven't seen any information/recording of that. Well, we can predict that he maybe could have had something around E5-F5 in head voice/falsetto as this register *usually* extends about 1 octave above chest voice, but that's just my theory, because there are exceptions, some people have 1.5+ octaves in head voice above their highest chest note
Maybe. I originally started making this video starting from F3 and had an F#3 included, but after talking to Jay from the Oktavism channel, I couldn’t confirm it was him singing it so I cut it out. Read the description for more info
Ну, это же даже не пение. А просто хрипота. Смысл песен в ПЕНИИ, т.е. в проговаривании слов (под ноты). А не мычание ... Непонятно, честно, для чего это вообще
1:40 this may not be Zlatopolsky. I’ll update this comment if and when I learn any more
@@pilivon Yes, but Alexander Ort's voice is brighter than that so I doubt it's Alexander Ort
@@danielphendarko2651 Oh, yes, You are right, I've listened Ort once again, this is defenetely not him.
It's Ort when he seems to lose his timing.
Bumbababumbabumbabumbum....
Whoops... E2, B1
too bright to be zlat, sound much closer to alexander bondarenko
Sounds like the note being close to someone's low end of the range, so I doubt it could be Zlatopolsky.
3:47 That’s the scariest fucking lullaby i’ve ever heard
Would scare a kid to death! The bogeyman is REAL & UNDER YOUR BED !!!
That's so dark! But, I get it! That's the best & loudest clip in this vid to me!
@@littleshadow2707 That's actually the same frequency as one of the lowest ship horns in the world
If we took into account that C1 is the note he was sure of and he used in live choral singing, this comes insane... He probably could hit Bb0 for fun at good day
im sure that if he could project C1 over the choir then his lowest quiet note would be around G0 and thats crazy
@@JAC0B_BASS, I am sure his quiet notes could have probably gone even lower than G0. I can only project down to A1 (E1 is my lowest chest note, but not loud enough for a choir), but I am good to B0 with a little bit of fry in a small venue and solo. Imagine if he had learned and decided to use subharmonics! I can reach Eb0 with subharmonics and Zlatopolsky's voice makes me sound like a tenor, lol.
That's the thing, you don't have to be religious, you don't have to be vocal expert. but you can still feel this unique power from a voice like that.
So atheistic
@@Hhjhfu247 So true.
I'm an atheist, and yet I'm still very drawn to sacred music.
@@Satellite_Of_Lovesame.
The GOAT. By far, greatest of all time...
The Shepard of bass!
GOOOOOOOOOLLLLL!!!!!
The awesome thing about the russian oktavists is that they don't have the lowest range, the have the loudest low range.
He had the lowest but we dont know how low he could sing. We know only that he could project C1 over the choir XD
@@JAC0B_BASS I think its full voice? Or maybe strohbass?
@@lurecyyy between full voice and strohbass theres a hearable difference. I mean when you switch from mod to strohbass you hear that it soubds different. Zlatopolsky did slide from A1 to D1 (we magnify) on one breath with the same volume and same overtones. Its just his voice. Amazing
@@JAC0B_BASS alright I assumed that it was full voice
@@lurecyyy as far as I know strohbass is modal. It’s simply a way of amplifying the note with the trade off of it being a far harsher sound. From what I understand most oktavist use this technique at a certain point.
3:09 closure of the ligaments on a note B0
And 7:56 note G0
@Hellcat Bass because physically it was. There are many moments like this one when he enters 0 octave by accident. (Voice cracks and accidential subharmonics)
The C1 WAS a C1. The electric power of his E1 and G1 was and still is unmatched
I don't know anything about b and g and those letter things, but what i do know.. his vocal gives me goosebumps, every single time.
Those letters refer to the piano buttons. There are notes on piano that start with C, D, E, F, G, A, B and there also the notes between like C# Eb, F#, G# etc. And each note has its frequency so when you for example hit a B3 on a piano, you just hear how high it is or, how low it is. Then you sing along as high or as low as the note is and you know which note you just sung. Shortly saying 😁
@@MultiKamil97 dunno why they scrambled the alphabetic order tho xd
@@rxhx Right? Hah
Natural notes////Sharps and flats (semitone above or below).
C do. C# (do sharp)
D re. Db (re flat) D# (re sharp)
E mi. Eb (mi flat)
F fa. F# (fa sharp)
G sol. Gb (sol flat) G# (sol sharp)
A la. Ab (la flat) A# (a sharp)
B ti. Bb (ti flat)
@@ferbmixes8352 but why not in alphabetic order, so confusing
Yo! I’m so excited somebody actually made this video! Amazing video man, keep it up
I wanted to make it since months but I couldn't, finally someone made it, I wish they didn't wrote D1 - C1 instead of C#1 - B0 bc I listen C#1 - B0 I think
@@vocalsvideos458 generally it’s accepted as D1 - C1 as it goes with the key of the piece and it’s sort of pot luck as to what comes up on a tuner. Some people hear it closer to C#1 - B0 🤷♂️ incredible sound either way
Just calmly admiring this man's voice when 3:47 snatched my soul
3.47 frightened the dog.
Это Русский самородок! Златопольский - гений баса! Уважаю☝️
Ничего от русского у него нет. Советский, да
@@НатаН-с7н Не умничай!
@@capitanj.d. больше нечего ответить? То то и оно
@@НатаН-с7н еврей уж тогда, а не советский.
This was long overdue, thanks a million.
Very good video! Thanks for the information in the description aswell. He was an incredible bass.
This man Terrifies me sometimes 😅😳, amazing.
I'm not amazed by how low he can go, it's how loud he sounds.
Not impressed with how low he can go... I think you're confusing modal impostation of sound with subharmonics and fry. Don't mix the two. To hit a C2 or B1 with that much power and that much resonance and deepness isn't impressive? I would like to hear all these so called basses from accapella live and off mic. They would seem like tenors compared to Zlatopolsky. Most of the accappella ,,basses" are in fact baritones that get on mic and edit afterwards... On mic i have A1 but it sounds like a fart off mic... Just sayin'
@@Catalinddm 👍
@@Catalinddm Cool bud. No one cares. 👍
@@josephhobson99 speak for yourself...
@@Catalinddm, I am a low bass and can project an A1... Zlatopolsky was on a whole different level from even a low bass, for sure.
7:17 i dont even have any words, like, just, wow
BIIIIG sound
Sounds like a demon
That’s a G1 over an E major sonority. Interesting.
@@Scholaf_Olz good u like tenors and pp wipers 😑
Note at 5:59 is just a B1. The recording by Polyansky has no derivations from the written score as far as random oktaving. Also, I can hear him on the B. The F or so is just choral undertones by a well-tuned choir. Also structurally, it makes no sense for the oktavist to end a Russian orthodox piece on the fifth.
Xander how do u think you measure up against Zlatopolsky? lol
lol, it WAS a B1 only, based on the fact in that piece.@@JonHop1
@wALkEr-gd9ff not sure what your point is. I wasn't taking about the note. I was asking him how he thought his Octavism skills measured up against the GOAT in general, not about a B1 😅
Talk about hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit. This man's voice is truly divine proof. Shudders my soul to hear him. Looking up all these pieces. ✨👏🏻🕊
Yuri Vichnyakov stated in an interview back in his past that he was able to actually go all the way as high as G4.
Let’s go!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you! Thank you! This is a gem!
1:50 the same song Ort sings at "Basso Profondo and Oktavists" (The Oktavism Channel's one)?
2:52 Was that the performance where the singers next to Zlatopolsky were shaken for his voice?
1:50 yeah maybe. I was searching for that earlier but couldn’t find it. If I remember rightly Ort’s version is down to a Bb but I can’t remember off the top of my head
2:52 as far as I remember, there’s no specific performance that the person saying that credited, though I’m sure in most performances Zlatopolsky managed to rumble the people next to him
2:52 nope. The performance that you are talking about was by Moscow's grand choir. This Bb1 here is a one of Don Kossaken recordings.
@@JAC0B_BASS Thanks!
@@JAC0B_BASS I was wondering why this Bb1 seemed to have a little bit of struggling in there.
@@enocjordanabi4207 struggling? No... its powerful sound, Bb1 has never been a problem for him. Maybe its because of recording. Its don kosaken, sometimes zlatopolsky sounds very weird on their cds.
Funnily enough, Zlatopolsky never went lower than, say, Geoff Castellucci, but where Castellucci sounds smooth, soft, and quiet even through the compressor, Zlatopolsky is as loud as a ships horn.
which makes it that much more impressive
Come on bro, don't think Zlatopolsky CAN'T go that low. What's Geoff's solid lowest note right now? A B0 from Halo Theme(not including brief growl/vocal fry), just half notes below C1, and what Zlatopolsky can do? Sing a C1 like a spaceship about to lift off. Zlapolsky could easily blast those so-called modern "extreme/inhuman" low notes if he wanted to.
Geoffs true lowest chest note is somewhere around g1, zlatopolsky hits c1 over a choir
You cant compare the two singers. Both are unbelievably talented, but in very different ways.
The like/dislike ratio speaks for itself
Thank you so much finally someone did a vocal range to one of the best singers ever, can you add next to vocal range in the title something like, C1 - F4 (it's a B0 to me)
But he once sang A0 by accident
@@JAC0B_BASS When he sang A0?
amazing video! been waiting for this one since you announced it in a comment
Very interesting. I really like your compilations
Thanks for watching
Yuri said that he heard himself zlatopolsky sinigng G4
Yeah I reckon he could put it a bit further in both directions. Consider how amazing Glenn Miller is of an oktavist. In this radio interview he scrapes out a C1/B0 ua-cam.com/video/Aiy_8-7ZRwI/v-deo.html Zlatopolsky had to ability to PROJECT that over an entire choir. What an insane being. Absolute freak of nature
@@matthewdockray9745 glenn mixed it with fry... Still impressive obvously but you know. He showed on one video his lowest chest was barely singed E1. Of course I respect Glenn and he is an amazing low singer I just said it for those who didint know
@@JAC0B_BASS just goes to show how much of a monster Zlat was lol
OHHHH YESSSS!
Zlatopolsky: the man with thunder for a voice.
Fantastic, thank you so much!
Oh god. He had 3 octaves in chest!!!!🤯
3 octaves and a perfect 4th in chest
B1 is a scary ass note. I’m a bass and I can only sing C2
im a high tenor and im not far off, you are a baritone.
Im tenor i cam sing until G1 and D1 easily.....
@@adamirfan6986 send
@@adamirfan6986 It is vocal fry, or you are not tenor, i can do it too) but my supported is f2
@@grannyeyesgameplay5993 i think i'm bari-tenor...
Pure magic!
Even an F3 is a high note for this guy’s standards.
seeing how his speaking voice was around F1 he technically is 'singing up to' most notes and not 'down to'
@@jrk1666 Oh yes I wholeheartedly agree.
I like how Mikhail's higher notes show his tonal color, which is more of a bass. No one think I'm actually calling him a bass please, ik he's an okatvist.
I mean, an oktavist is a bass. His vocal classification is a basso profundo, and his role in choral music is oktavist (octaving the bass line). Calling him a bass is completely ok, but I see why it causes problems considering some of the people called “basses” nowadays.
@@boundary2580 It's because majority of modern 'basses' are not natural basses, but rather manufactured basses. They developed that range but the actual voice by nature is not that of a bass. Mikhail is a real low bass. JD Sumner was more of a higher bass. You can hear quite a bit of a tone difference between the two. JD also smoked a lot so I suggest listening to his young voice for that.
@@KajiVocals i was more considering opera and choir than gospel singing. I would consider J.D. a “manufactured” bass as well considering his heavy smoking and naturally fry like voice. Also, I would call most gospel and “acapella” basses manufactured anyway because of the use of the microphone. Not saying he’s a bad bass, just not my taste. Glenn Miller is probably the best example of a true bass voice nowadays, and some of the greats from the past include Cesare Siepi, Ezio Pinza, Samuel Ramey, Hans Hotter, George London, and Kurt Moll. Obviously there are more even today, but those are the ones that I can think of off the top of my head. It’s not just the low notes, but the color and weight of the voice that makes a bass, and a lot of the guys I just named (even Miller at some point) could sing wonderful high Fs and even Gs through great technique. I’m not some kind of bass elitist, but I think it is regressive for some singers to label themselves as something that limits their potential. An example is Bryn Terfel, a ✌️ bass-baritone ✌️ who has wonderful high notes up to a high A but sings lower roles that he really doesn’t sound comfortable in. I think a part of the problem are the shifting definitions of what makes someone a certain voice type because of how high a lot of modern tenors are singing. In the past if you could sing a high G easy enough, you were a tenor. Heavy voice? You were a dramatic tenor. Dark tone? You were a baritone with a good high range. If seems so simple but people became obsessed with being classified as one thing or another and thus began singing roles that their voices just aren’t suited for.
@@boundary2580 Bryn is more likely to even be a tenor than bass-baritone. It is absolutely not a low voice.
@Steven Criscione The same goes for baritones as well.
do you have links for the songs at 0:35 and 6:20 ? they're incredibly beautiful
0:35 ua-cam.com/video/2QU2V_sFdHM/v-deo.html
6:20 hopefully the one you meant ua-cam.com/video/rohfM1xKKJU/v-deo.html
1:40 is that really Zlatoposlky? Doesn't sound like him in my opinion, any further info would be much appreciated. Great video btw!
Yeah it does sound a little... disappointing(?) in terms of power and sound. This is a link to the video which doesn’t really have any information on it ua-cam.com/video/clLvIbbwAqY/v-deo.html The site that I found it from listed it as Zlatopolsky’s voice, and Jay said when I was talking to him thathe did help with the creation of the thread on the site, so I’m not too sure. Might be worth asking him 🤷♂️
Thanks for watching
@Steven Criscione tbf his low range does sound quite inconsistent, though that may be more down to the volume he’s allowed to produce in certain dynamics in the music than his actual voice. I agree though that the B1 is strange
@@matthewdockray9745 Probably it's
1) A stylistic choice
2) Him having a bad day
3) Him being younger
@@reubenthomas7907 I know what you mean, i immediately went with no.3 at first but the recording sounds too good to be as old as when Mikhail was younger (even if it was remastered). So, i'm probably thinking, simply not Mikhail. To be honest though, great B1, it's just not how Zlatopolsky would have sounded in my opinion.
@@GeorgeLifterMann ua-cam.com/video/5e9uPtu3wRY/v-deo.html listen after 3:14 , especially to the Ab1/G1 after 3:50 , Zlat was quite young, 36 at the time of this recording. Though definitely sounding like a Basso profondo, he doesnt sound like his usual self.
8:47 to me that's a B0 to me he went (C#1 - B0)
@Steven Criscione thank you, I checked it like a year ago or so
@Steven Criscione it's the lowest known note sang without amplification in recorded history
Actually it's between the two notes.
7:28 actually, I'm surprised at how full his voice is.
4:12 6:31 7:05 the best blends #3 sounded like an F though not an E
1:02 = "brooooooooo?"
Спасибо!
Note on your Vocal Range Video,
- On High notes, start at F3, F#3, G3, or G#3.
- On Low Notes, start at A2, G#2, or G2
Well I think that depends on the singer tbh. No point starting Zlatopolsky on an A2 cuz it’s not even remotely low for him
But A2 is low only for a tenor
For the human voice, the low notes are below F2. Even in the Zlatopolsky speaking range, a2 is high for him. His speaking range was probably Eb1-E2
1:01 the power of this c2 is comically insane lol
Now Yuri's vocal range?
E1( sharp)to A4. He sings this in one song. ( Evening bells)
Mikhail Zlatopolsky looks like a cute grandpa but his voice is the most imponent
0:35 Pagliachi
3:49
Mikhail Zlatopolsky has a fantastic voice. I read, that he can sing the C1 but is the C1 the lowest note of his vocal range or can he sing lower? The same question I would like to ask for the F4 is this the highest note of his vocal range? Another question I have is the following: Does anybody know a video, in which nobody else is singing but Mikhail Zlatopolsky or at least where he is singing a solo?
Okay
So
His lowest and highest RECORDED notes are in this video - the C1 and the F4. It is reported that he once sung a G4 but that was never recorded. He almost certainly had a falsetto range too but that also was never recorded (no need for a huge oktavist to ever be singing in the falsetto range). His C1 was projected over an entire choir, so he undoubtably would’ve been able to sing lower notes, tho with diminished power. I suspect he may have been able to scrape an A0 but this is just a guess.
To hear him singing solo there are very few recordings, but ‘lullaby’ was a radio interview that featured just him singing and nobody else
ua-cam.com/video/wqAQIuurGe8/v-deo.html
I've seen a comment from a guy who claimed to have known Zlatopolsky and heard him singing down to A0 live.
Can't tell if it's true though.
@@matthewdockray9745 Thank you for your answer. It is very unfortunate that his lowest note isn't recorded. But in spite of that I am really impressed of his voice. He can sing exactly two octaves lower than me but I can sing just one octave higher than him. Do you know his highest note in falsetto?
@@dmytrotsvyntarnyi799 Thank you for your answer. Do you know in which video you have senn this comment?
@@vielphantasie2549 I don't remember the video I've seen the comment in, it was like a year ago or more. I only remember, that it was written in russian language and the vid itself also was from some Russian community based chanel.
Talking about Zlatopolsky's falsetto,I haven't seen any information/recording of that.
Well, we can predict that he maybe could have had something around E5-F5 in head voice/falsetto as this register *usually* extends about 1 octave above chest voice, but that's just my theory, because there are exceptions, some people have 1.5+ octaves in head voice above their highest chest note
👏👏👏👏👏👏
3:49 4:01 that G#1 x. X
1:20 для себя
Do you know one or more f#3 of him please?
Maybe. I originally started making this video starting from F3 and had an F#3 included, but after talking to Jay from the Oktavism channel, I couldn’t confirm it was him singing it so I cut it out. Read the description for more info
Good stuff
3:51 😳
Almost inaudible lol
@@matthewdockray9745 Yeah, the fundamental was shadowed by those crazy overtones.
4:34 4:59
Gua malah kesini ajh.
3:45 👹👾🥴
Hi, do you know any E2 of him please?
No, I think it's too high for him :P
6:13
5:15
💪💪💪👍
Solo B1 is not zlatopolsky
In hindsight, maybe not
@@matthewdockray9745 maybe? The soloist here barely sings this B1. Zlatopolsky was able to overpower 80 people choir singing B1
6:51 7:06 7:28
5:36 5:45 5:58
Ну, это же даже не пение. А просто хрипота. Смысл песен в ПЕНИИ, т.е. в проговаривании слов (под ноты). А не мычание ...
Непонятно, честно, для чего это вообще
Спасибо!
3:49
7:40
3:49
Спасибо!!!