Here is why T-15 is the best IFV in the world - T-15 Infantry Fighting Vehicle

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 кві 2020
  • - Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder
    Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.
    Patreon: / redeffect
    T-15 is an Infantry Fighting Vehicle made on the new Armata platform developed in Russia. While many IFVs don't have good protection and rather focus on mobility, T-15 and a few other IFVs don't. That is something that makes them unique, but there are many other things that make T-15 unique...
    Sources:
    btvt.info/7english/armata_bmp/...
    btvt.info/1inservice/bmbumer.htm
    btvt.info/2futureprojects/arma...
    gurkhan.blogspot.com/2015/06/1...
    gurkhan.blogspot.com/2017/11/1...
    gurkhan.blogspot.com/2019/06/1...
    gurkhan.blogspot.com/2017/01/1...
    gurkhan.blogspot.com/2015/07/b...
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @RedEffectChannel
    @RedEffectChannel  4 роки тому +100

    >>>Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder
    Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.

    • @theblackbandit2703
      @theblackbandit2703 4 роки тому +3

      Make a video on Hard kill APS currently developed by Israel, Germany, Russia..

    • @sovietunion8158
      @sovietunion8158 4 роки тому +3

      We liked the video very much
      Can you please do one on German Lynx KF-31 & KF-41 IFVs as well ?

    • @Anni-wn9dl
      @Anni-wn9dl 4 роки тому

      Make a video on Chinese vt4.

    • @PR1ZR4K_svk
      @PR1ZR4K_svk 4 роки тому +4

      They should add T14 Armata in war thunder (R.I.P American tanks)

    • @jovin2005
      @jovin2005 4 роки тому +2

      Arjun vs Leopard 2 please

  • @91plm
    @91plm 4 роки тому +1522

    I'd rather use the T-15 as an MBT rather than Arjun. XD

    • @Xcelcior6780
      @Xcelcior6780 4 роки тому +97

      😂true that

    • @rakaipikatan8922
      @rakaipikatan8922 4 роки тому +224

      Man, I rather use 90 mm Sherman than Arjun

    • @firma_quia_verum
      @firma_quia_verum 4 роки тому +175

      Jajaja, brace yourself from patriotic indian

    • @parasnaradiya2608
      @parasnaradiya2608 4 роки тому +38

      And i will use Naag missiles against any tank in the world,
      Wy to use expensive tanks when you can hunt the enemy down beyond their sight

    • @utaMAN12345
      @utaMAN12345 4 роки тому +99

      @Vyrex420 no

  • @OltsuSuomesta
    @OltsuSuomesta 4 роки тому +497

    Last time I was this early the IS-3 was scary

    • @lemonhaze715
      @lemonhaze715 4 роки тому +14

      1945?

    • @lycoris7890
      @lycoris7890 4 роки тому +1

      XD

    • @utaMAN12345
      @utaMAN12345 4 роки тому +26

      Still is to me

    • @pvtnewb
      @pvtnewb 4 роки тому +17

      Before HEAT-FS and ATGM spam

    • @astafzciba
      @astafzciba 4 роки тому +14

      Still remember the nightmare of going against is-3 with my tiger 2.

  • @kazari_390
    @kazari_390 4 роки тому +441

    You forgot the most important thing about t-15: It is dummy thicc

    • @dr_birb
      @dr_birb 4 роки тому +3

      U meant fat

    • @aleksisdanielsekks3051
      @aleksisdanielsekks3051 4 роки тому +60

      Thicc*

    • @MrDaniyil
      @MrDaniyil 4 роки тому +20

      and a sound of its tracks keeps alerting the guards!

    • @woodonfire7406
      @woodonfire7406 4 роки тому +3

      @@dr_birb no no, Kurganet is fat

    • @hoshyro
      @hoshyro 4 роки тому +29

      Extra thicc Ruski IFV
      Only the sexiest designs from Motherland )))

  • @marpso1480
    @marpso1480 4 роки тому +282

    I need to do my homework but this is more important

  • @GenScinmore
    @GenScinmore 4 роки тому +119

    "softer armored ground vehicles"
    Bradley: *Nervously Sweating"

    • @willthorson4543
      @willthorson4543 4 роки тому +10

      Then it laughs in tow2b.

    • @lazarjovanovic4388
      @lazarjovanovic4388 4 роки тому +26

      @@willthorson4543 it can't kill the t15

    • @ItsRawdraft2
      @ItsRawdraft2 3 роки тому +17

      @@willthorson4543 Good luck with that. The Ataka outranges the TOW2B, not to mention the double layer of APS.

    • @gamingrex2930
      @gamingrex2930 3 роки тому +9

      Bradley, the awkward IFV/troop transport that can’t carry too many guys due to the insane fire power it carries.
      At this point i’m still confused as to why america doesn’t just make a dedicated troop carrier and dedicated light tank separately.

    • @potatojuice5124
      @potatojuice5124 3 роки тому +6

      @@gamingrex2930 makes more sense to use something like a more modern m113 as troop transport and the Bradley as like support

  • @sovietchadster907
    @sovietchadster907 4 роки тому +62

    Red Effect is the least biased channel on UA-cam, thats why he never did a Bob Semple review. 10 minutes of him saying 'excellent' would be too suspicious

  • @evanmcc1877
    @evanmcc1877 4 роки тому +338

    I think you should cover ifvs and other non mbt vehicles. Lots of interesting vehicles like bmpt terminator, centauro, stryker, marder etc.

    • @maxim6088
      @maxim6088 4 роки тому +8

      Terminator is a beast! And the centaurp would be my pick for a daily driver tank!

    • @casbot71
      @casbot71 4 роки тому +9

      They may not be as "sexy" as a MBT, but they are *_vital_* for the military.
      Just ask all those MBT's that went into Chechnya without infantry support…
      And for current Western military operations of the past two decades, they have had more utility.
      A MBT is the tip of the spear, but a spear is more than just a sharp point.

    • @jirehlin9078
      @jirehlin9078 4 роки тому

      U also ca0n add in singapores bionix and terrex

    • @steelgear3876
      @steelgear3876 3 роки тому

      Add the Namer to this list. Now that’s a heavily armoured IFV

    • @kousand9917
      @kousand9917 2 роки тому

      Oh God the centauro I'm having flashbacks to war thunder but yes that thing is amazing

  • @sherlocksinha2435
    @sherlocksinha2435 4 роки тому +450

    So a Arjun cant pen this thing from the front , has more armor than the arjun too so.

    • @parasnaradiya2608
      @parasnaradiya2608 4 роки тому +7

      Sir guns don't kill only the bullets do,
      Nag missiles on arjun can bring the shit out of this machinary

    • @ledzik1893
      @ledzik1893 4 роки тому +103

      @@parasnaradiya2608 Laughs in APS

    • @parasnaradiya2608
      @parasnaradiya2608 4 роки тому +4

      @@ledzik1893 nag is a top attack missile 😂 😂

    • @ledzik1893
      @ledzik1893 4 роки тому +84

      @@parasnaradiya2608 And T-15 have softkill APS against top-atack missiles

    • @parasnaradiya2608
      @parasnaradiya2608 4 роки тому +3

      @@ledzik1893 what about one after another missile nd no tank is invincible, ..... ATGM, sabot, lg bombs etc etc

  • @sadcide1165
    @sadcide1165 4 роки тому +194

    War Thunder players: pls no

  • @Rohrkrepierer
    @Rohrkrepierer 4 роки тому +819

    NATO: Nice tank you got there.
    Russia: Thanks.
    NATO: How many do you have?
    Russia: 3

    • @lukapintaric6312
      @lukapintaric6312 4 роки тому +350

      How many will you have by the 2025?
      Russia:If all goes well..10

    • @smolcat7896
      @smolcat7896 4 роки тому +12

      Lol true

    • @AllThingsCubey
      @AllThingsCubey 4 роки тому +118

      At least next gen Russian armour is notably superior, as a reason for the low production numbers. The Su57 fighter is still 10-15 years behind aircraft like the F-22 and F-35, and hasn't entered service yet, with only 12 prototypes and a single "production" model which crashed and was destroyed before it was delivered.

    • @maggyyolokraut1941
      @maggyyolokraut1941 4 роки тому +65

      ohhh the tragedy of the Russian arms industry...........

    • @QualityPen
      @QualityPen 4 роки тому +53

      Maggy YoloKraut Not so much the arms industry, more an underdeveloped economy.

  • @neme9906
    @neme9906 4 роки тому +84

    Me:*sees RedEffect upload*
    My finger:I am speed

  • @dmitriyparfenov
    @dmitriyparfenov 4 роки тому +138

    Edit: There are newer pictures of Kurganets with Epoha combat module, which includes a 57mm grenade launcher (LShO-57 low ballistics cannon), 4 Kornets and 8 newest small size Bulat ATGMs. As far as new combat modules go, it can be installed on T-15.

    • @Guhonter
      @Guhonter 4 роки тому +1

      Could you post the link please, I'd like to see :)

    • @dmitriyparfenov
      @dmitriyparfenov 4 роки тому +16

      @@Guhonter OK, searched the internet and found only Kurganets IFV (2 front most vehicles) with this module from Victory Parade 2020 training in Alabino in late March. But as far as modern russian combat modules go, I'm pretty sure it can go onto T-15.
      ic.pics.livejournal.com/bmpd/38024980/7898035/7898035_original.jpg

    • @rakaipikatan8922
      @rakaipikatan8922 4 роки тому

      Didn't they also say the T-15 can be armed with 57 mm gun? Or it just only prototype? Anyway thanks for the info.

    • @dmitriyparfenov
      @dmitriyparfenov 4 роки тому +8

      @@rakaipikatan8922 There is a T-15 in the video armed with AU-220M module. The module is itself armed with a high velocity 57mm gun.

    • @rakaipikatan8922
      @rakaipikatan8922 4 роки тому +1

      @@dmitriyparfenov I'm sorry I didn't watched till the end XD. On other notes why Russia have both Kurganets and T-15? Do they want to replace airborne IFV too?

  • @TheJumpersap
    @TheJumpersap 4 роки тому +96

    " Depends on how well this video does i might make a video about german puma" nerver have i clicked on the likebutton as fast as i did now :D

  • @johnclement189
    @johnclement189 4 роки тому +98

    Allied Nation : You really have alot of new tank stuffs huh. How many?
    Russia : It ain't much but it's honest work.

    • @christiandauz3742
      @christiandauz3742 4 роки тому +8

      Allies wished they they had the T15 during WW1

    • @brigadier3596
      @brigadier3596 4 роки тому +15

      @@christiandauz3742 They wished to have ppsh41 during the first crusade

    • @maxim6088
      @maxim6088 4 роки тому +3

      why do you call them (probably NATO) allied nations?

    • @christiandauz3742
      @christiandauz3742 4 роки тому

      @@maxim6088
      They were called Allies in both World Wars

    • @maxim6088
      @maxim6088 4 роки тому +6

      @@christiandauz3742 bruh, who? the USSR (now Russia) was an allay too

  • @Alpostpone
    @Alpostpone 4 роки тому +43

    You could've just said:
    "Armor."
    /video

  • @justingries
    @justingries 2 роки тому +8

    I mean... sure, in theory? So far, however, they appear to be available in the same numbers as unicorns and dragons.

  • @schlirf
    @schlirf 4 роки тому +27

    Former American 19D/K here: The '15 is a nice system and well designed. In comparison to the BMD/BMP/PT series vehicles it is a remarkable improvement both in firepower and protection. However (you were expecting that word to pop up), the issue is Infantry protection and deployment, as opposed to the cost of weapon system. Wars regardless of which nation conducts them, usually end up using the cheapest equipment available to successfully accomplish the job. When the battle taxis start costing Millions of anything but Lira, the problems start. Otherwise, excellent video!

    • @Frontline_view_kaiser
      @Frontline_view_kaiser Рік тому +10

      Good job perfectly describing the battlefield Situation in Ukraine, where BMP-1 and Humvees have more impact than BTR-4 and T15

    • @Forbidden_Word
      @Forbidden_Word 9 днів тому +1

      Bro I read that as Former American 19K/D.
      Like bruh, what do you mean former? And how'd you get a 19 kill streak 🤣

    • @schlirf
      @schlirf 8 днів тому

      @@Forbidden_Word Pissed off my First Sgt, Reg.CSM,Squadron CSM, and my platoon daddy all in one day?

  • @djigojira_fpv7540
    @djigojira_fpv7540 4 роки тому +111

    I simple man,
    I read T-15,
    I click faster then blitzkrieg

  • @zinox9262
    @zinox9262 2 роки тому +3

    This thing is fucking scary. I'd capitulate when I saw this landship rolling towards me on 70kmph full throttle. *scary, very scary* 😨

  • @viking197
    @viking197 4 роки тому +117

    Noob Simps: Arjun is best multi tank role it also is best IFV, TD, LT, MT, HT, MBT and more

    • @Simon-zf6uw
      @Simon-zf6uw 4 роки тому +49

      It is also the best attack heli and fighter jet.

    • @pencilgaming1233
      @pencilgaming1233 4 роки тому +34

      It can be submerged and it can deploy torpedoes for naval warfare

    • @viking197
      @viking197 4 роки тому +30

      Totally forgot about that and also its turret rotation is so fast it lifts it off the ground defying the gravitational pull of the earth

    • @jonahhekmatyar
      @jonahhekmatyar 4 роки тому +25

      There is discussion among the Indian airforce to replace their fighter aircraft with Arjun as well

    • @daninquin2732
      @daninquin2732 4 роки тому +25

      @@viking197 it has Aircraft carrier capabilities too

  • @doodskie999
    @doodskie999 4 роки тому +14

    How much armor do you want comrade?
    Yes

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 3 роки тому +1

      Three times as much needed to stop an auto Cannon round but not enough to stop an anti-tank missile or main gun round

    • @Phantom-bh5ru
      @Phantom-bh5ru 3 роки тому

      @@jamesricker3997 that upper front plate looks like a automatic ricochet anyways

    • @bluecedar7914
      @bluecedar7914 3 дні тому

      Or an anti-armour FPV drone.

  • @ikill-98
    @ikill-98 4 роки тому +26

    I want ot see T15 with 152mm gun just like the prototype (if u know what iam talking about )
    It well be the best tank destroyer ever

    • @niko7626
      @niko7626 4 роки тому

      ikills 98 pffff

    • @saint_alucardwarthunder759
      @saint_alucardwarthunder759 4 роки тому +1

      It wasn't prototype of T-14 though, it was a different tank. It's Object 195, and before that were also several 152mm objects like Obj.477

    • @yanuchiuchihaanimegamesand3907
      @yanuchiuchihaanimegamesand3907 4 роки тому +1

      KV-2: AM I a joke to You? *Sneezes*
      The Himalayas: *has left the server*

    • @kskeel1124
      @kskeel1124 4 роки тому +1

      You mean the "mock ups" that were driven in the parade??? lol

  • @ilhamhannani645
    @ilhamhannani645 4 роки тому +9

    enemy radio voice : *ricochet,ricochet,RICOCHEET!!!*

  • @AsgardVenture
    @AsgardVenture 4 роки тому +63

    Great job as always! Would be really nice to see a similar video for the PUMA IFV. Especially interesting would be the way in which Germany deploys IFVs within their armor doctrine. I’m not an expert on this, but what I mean is the separation in mobilized infantry (Panzergrenadiere) and the light infantry (Jäger) and how the mobilized infantry always operates together with MBTs. Maybe you could show how that affected the development of the puma.

    • @rakaipikatan8922
      @rakaipikatan8922 4 роки тому +1

      Wait what? So what are the purpose of the Jäger wing if they are separated from the combined arms doctrine, like low intensity combat or asymmetric warfare? Thank you.

    • @namesurname624
      @namesurname624 4 роки тому +8

      doesn't everyone else do this too? no one sends mbts on their own

    • @AsgardVenture
      @AsgardVenture 4 роки тому +18

      Name Surname don’t quote me, I’m not an expert on this field, but for example the US Army uses IFVs more like battlefield taxis. The infantry and the MBTs are usually paired together, but they follow different objectives and they kinda support each other, but they are not inherently one unit. In the German doctrine there are two kinds of infantry and the Panzergrenadiere are always attached to a tank unit, they rarely operate as a single unit. So in a way they don’t use the infantry to sweep up after the tanks breached trough the area, but the infantry moves in side by side with the MBTs. That’s why German tanks don’t have ERA and I would guess that’s also a reason why the Puma isn’t the best IFV to fight other MBTs, since it doesn’t need that when always has the fire support of a Leopard at its side.

    • @AsgardVenture
      @AsgardVenture 4 роки тому +5

      Rakai Pikatan they are the paratroopers (Fallschirmjäger), the mountain troops (Gebirgsjäger) light light infantry (Feldjäger) and maybe some more. They are usually more specialized and not used in wide open combat but in their special designated role.

    • @JTSIN
      @JTSIN 4 роки тому +10

      Having served as a gunner on Marder A3 I think mechanised infantry is the better translation. The analogy of the IFVs as purely a battle taxi is selling it a bit short. You basically have battle groups of IFVs who’s purpose is primarily driven by the environment. That can be troop protection and fire support like in the ISAF mission, ie battle taxi. Against a more capable enemy this could be that, but also anti MBT missions (Marder was equipped with Milan) or using the 20mm gun against other IFVs, lighter targets such as trucks and infantry (Marder had 2 types of ammo - one armour piercing, the other one HE or even anti aircraft (crude, but depending on enemy equipment still effective against transport fixed wing and helicopters).

  • @Sinni64
    @Sinni64 4 роки тому +10

    The interesting part about IFVs is, how they work together/are connected with the Infantry they are transporting.

  • @Floris_VI
    @Floris_VI 4 роки тому +58

    Please make 9ne on the puma too, i loved this! Also, this seems like it would be a crazy expensive ifv compared to others

    • @phil__K
      @phil__K 4 роки тому +4

      I wouldn't be surprised if its USD cost is comparable to western equivalents

    • @nemisous83
      @nemisous83 4 роки тому +3

      biggest issue with Puma is the current production unit operated by Bundeswehr doesn't have ATGM launchers integral to the turret in fact the Spiker ATGM launcher tested by the Bundeswehr was pretty much a box that was ADHOC tacked onto the side the turret.

    • @skipsvk1134
      @skipsvk1134 4 роки тому

      That why it will be prototype untill it becomes obsolete. russian do not have golden rublles to buy them.

    • @user-tk5jx4ih4g
      @user-tk5jx4ih4g 4 роки тому

      @@nemisous83 where is the problem? They don't have to be integral as they can just bolt them on if needed.

    • @nemisous83
      @nemisous83 4 роки тому +1

      @@user-tk5jx4ih4g that's like saying its okay if a tank has no armor because it will be added on later. As it stands the Bundeswehr doesnt have any Puma's with ATGM launchers

  • @ernstbusch179
    @ernstbusch179 4 роки тому +19

    I'm scared of this ifv and I would love to see the video about the puma

  • @muhammedhamza6940
    @muhammedhamza6940 4 роки тому +4

    Thanks you bro I was waiting for this for a long time make more

  • @kisscola
    @kisscola 4 роки тому +9

    I would highly enjoy a future Puma video!

  • @Simon-zf6uw
    @Simon-zf6uw 4 роки тому +1

    This video is great. Keep up the good work, man 👍

  • @vladimirvojtaml
    @vladimirvojtaml 2 роки тому +34

    Extremely impressive IFV I'd say it's even better than the Puma because of the versatile nature and being more spacious.

    • @T33K3SS3LCH3N
      @T33K3SS3LCH3N Рік тому +14

      And by know we know why Puma is what it is rather than T-15.
      Because Puma is actually in service and undergoing the typical painful bug fixing process of modern APCs, while T-15 remains a paper tiger with little prospect of seeing operational readiness in the 2020s or ever.

    • @TheDemigans
      @TheDemigans Рік тому +2

      @@T33K3SS3LCH3Nhey, they now have T-15 Armata’s in Ukraine!
      Somewhere… maybe… if they get to the front before they break down in parade formation… it was supposed to be ready in 2015 right? And now the date of the first batch was supposed to be the end of 2023? How likely would that be with the ongoing sanctions and production of all the other vehicles? And would there ever be enough volume of them to even matter no matter what kind of T-15 you build?

    • @kyrazek3912
      @kyrazek3912 11 місяців тому +1

      @@TheDemigans ... if you are refering to t 14 ''breaking down'' on parade it didnt happened

    • @TheDemigans
      @TheDemigans 11 місяців тому

      @@kyrazek3912 ua-cam.com/video/o89BYp95Qiw/v-deo.html
      Ok so it didn’t happen, but Russia says it did happen but as part of an evacuation drill in the middle of a parade. So who am I going to believe here? Russia with such a poor excuse, you who says the opposite of Russia (because they don’t deny the breakdown just that it was part of it) or I believe that a T-14 broke down during the parade.
      Occam’s razor anyone?

    • @FutureGohanGlazer
      @FutureGohanGlazer 9 місяців тому

      @@TheDemiganswait wait wait you watch this channel but think the T-14 broke down in the parade?

  • @chickenboi693
    @chickenboi693 4 роки тому +96

    Gotta love them russians

    • @vanukas8783
      @vanukas8783 4 роки тому +10

      Oh those Russians...

    • @ultron2-465
      @ultron2-465 4 роки тому +1

      Tohtori Vanukas RARA RASPUTIN

    • @vanukas8783
      @vanukas8783 4 роки тому +1

      @@ultron2-465 Lover of the Russian queen

    • @ultron2-465
      @ultron2-465 4 роки тому +1

      Tohtori Vanukas there was a cat that really was gone

    • @vanukas8783
      @vanukas8783 4 роки тому +1

      @@ultron2-465 ra ra Rasputin

  • @vipluvster007
    @vipluvster007 4 роки тому +20

    Hi Red Effect Team,
    Request a video review of Sprud-SDM1 Light Tank against Chinese ZTQ-15 Light Tank. Thank you for keeping us updated with these world class products.

  • @warmbreeze7996
    @warmbreeze7996 4 роки тому

    Excellent content m8, and excellent vehicle too. Can't wait for others IFV videos

  • @groovyboy1584
    @groovyboy1584 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this amazing video AGAIN!
    Redeffect is one of the most underrated video-maker ever.
    He is the person who knows how to get and how to keep the people’s attention.
    Keep doing the good work and have a nice day RedEffect!

  • @dearadolfh8744
    @dearadolfh8744 Рік тому +6

    best ifv but one problem. It is made in modern Russia

    • @yaya_is_real
      @yaya_is_real Рік тому

      " As of May 2023, the T-15 Armata has not entered service and the program status is unknown."

  • @RedShocktrooperRST
    @RedShocktrooperRST 4 роки тому +19

    I wonder about T-15's weight. 55 tons seems heavy for an infantry fighting vehicle.

    • @davideb.4290
      @davideb.4290 4 роки тому +5

      Basically It Is heavier than some of their MBT s

    • @Ravasempai
      @Ravasempai 4 роки тому +19

      I agree, It is basicly a tank. With all that weight and kit, the cost must be astronomical. I cant see regiments of these coming across the northen plains in mass. More like only being equipted to elite units.

    • @user-le8wr4yz6q
      @user-le8wr4yz6q 4 роки тому +2

      it is more like a movable bunker that is supposed to survive in urban conditions/

    • @timokocian4769
      @timokocian4769 4 роки тому +1

      RedShocktrooper T-15 is heavier than the T-14, T-14 is an MBT and T-15 is only an IFV

    • @dr_birb
      @dr_birb 4 роки тому +1

      @@timokocian4769 kinda pepega if u ask me.

  • @blackarrow7536
    @blackarrow7536 4 роки тому

    From previous 1 years. I am intrested To see your infarmative videos. I learn a lot from you .THANKS YOU😎❤❤ KEEP it up.

  • @utaMAN12345
    @utaMAN12345 4 роки тому +11

    More ifv please, do puma

  • @Sebastian-yl7nq
    @Sebastian-yl7nq 4 роки тому +7

    I'd love to see a video on the new German Puma!
    It's really sad how many people just bash it and hate on it "because reasons" ... while completly ingnoring all the officials and Marder IVF crews praising this vehicle.

    • @IIMoses740II
      @IIMoses740II 4 роки тому

      What kind of hate is thrown at the Puma? I'm not familiar with it and am genuinely curious.

  • @stobrecanin
    @stobrecanin 4 роки тому +7

    Great vid 😍
    Do a puma next please 😅

  • @mohammadsaida4603
    @mohammadsaida4603 4 роки тому

    Nice video with clearly explaining thanks 👍

  • @kraken-sx2ys
    @kraken-sx2ys 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the video!! :)

  • @robertking3090
    @robertking3090 2 роки тому +3

    its a bmp 3 with sprinkles on top. I can put sprinkles on a turd and call it chocolate ice cream too.

  • @yashsingh3126
    @yashsingh3126 4 роки тому +3

    Great video as always, thank you so much for illustrating the information for us, waiting for your PUMA video, can you please do another video on Israeli NAMER APC?

  • @_OpFor
    @_OpFor 4 роки тому

    These new IFVs being made are so cool. Cant wait to see what else is made in the future

  • @anythingbutcash
    @anythingbutcash 4 роки тому

    Thank you for your hard work. I love your videos.

  • @maggyyolokraut1941
    @maggyyolokraut1941 4 роки тому +21

    tbh it looks like a pimped and maxed out BMP-1

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 3 роки тому +4

    Looks an impressive vehicle, and with the 57mm gun it will be a formidable foe!

  • @rancor6858
    @rancor6858 4 роки тому

    Keep doing these please there really cool. Tanks are cool but nice to learn about other armored vehicles

  • @johnlansing2902
    @johnlansing2902 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the video ..... yes that looks to be a truly great vehicle

  • @iananderson1848
    @iananderson1848 4 роки тому +11

    The Russians have always made excellent AFV. Battle tested and a deep history of use in a multitude of environments and missions . From an Aussie fan.

  • @billhanna2148
    @billhanna2148 4 роки тому +4

    Thanks for another excellent video 👍 and I am SO HAPPY that you are considering doing another IFV like the Puma💪👍🤓
    🤔 But I think the closest vehicle to the T15 is the Israeli Namer and not the Puma ..in my limited opinion.

  • @MrMarvin96
    @MrMarvin96 4 роки тому

    Nice video :)
    I'm really exited on the german Puma video

  • @omargreen3078
    @omargreen3078 4 роки тому

    Excellent work 👍

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 4 роки тому +8

    If you don't count an MI-24 as an IFV =D

  • @Flecktarn108
    @Flecktarn108 4 роки тому +4

    "didnt want to cover other armored vehicles, since there isnt really much to talk about" wait.. what ?

  • @evilestwheat8266
    @evilestwheat8266 4 роки тому

    Thanks so much red also I love ur content

  • @shayannn6385
    @shayannn6385 4 роки тому +1

    Thabks for content
    I had question
    So how many bullet(round)57mm gun carry ?in this ifv or BMP-3

  • @merkavamkivm5156
    @merkavamkivm5156 4 роки тому +17

    Can you make a video on the Israeli "aitan" IFV? (Merkava mkII hull with a 40 mm atuo-cannon)

    • @johnkenley4687
      @johnkenley4687 4 роки тому +4

      ??? the closest thing they have to anything named "aitan" is the Eitan AFV , however its a new vehicle separate from the merkava entirely as it's a wheeled fighting vehicle and its only optionally installed with a turret with a gun of unknown caliber. The closest thing the Israeli's have to what you described is the namer IFV equipped with the 30mm autocannon turret, but nothing the Israeli's use is equipped with a 40mm.

    • @merkavamkivm5156
      @merkavamkivm5156 4 роки тому +2

      @@johnkenley4687 yeah, I have miss-writen a the name, and 40 with 30...
      (Actually the aitan program uses multiple platforms, the most promising platform, is the namer heavy APC and the namer IS a merkava mkII hull.....)
      But I understand the Confusion.

    • @billhanna2148
      @billhanna2148 4 роки тому

      I was going to say that I thought the Isreal top dog tracked IFV was the Namer..a completely zero crew safety compromise vehicle that stood alone in my opinion.. until this BEAST T15😎

    • @johnkenley4687
      @johnkenley4687 4 роки тому

      @@merkavamkivm5156 the namer is a merkava Mk 4 hull, not a Mk 2

    • @merkavamkivm5156
      @merkavamkivm5156 4 роки тому

      @@johnkenley4687 yeah, It's not my day today :(

  • @FranciscoGonzalez-ki7km
    @FranciscoGonzalez-ki7km 2 роки тому +3

    What good is it if you only have some prototypes?

    • @Sveta7
      @Sveta7 2 роки тому

      You have to start somewhere?

    • @juntingiee2602
      @juntingiee2602 2 роки тому

      @@Sveta7 if they have to start somewhere they are still stuck at the start XD

    • @imightbearacist6613
      @imightbearacist6613 2 роки тому

      @@juntingiee2602 what?

  • @nathaniel5756
    @nathaniel5756 4 роки тому +2

    looking forward to the puma video!

  • @ala1990
    @ala1990 4 роки тому

    need more vids like this please

  • @agnetaklausen9131
    @agnetaklausen9131 4 роки тому +25

    Puma! Puma! Puma! Puma! :)

  • @chrisfoster555
    @chrisfoster555 4 роки тому +5

    55 tonnes . . .
    Good lord

    • @princessapplestrach6327
      @princessapplestrach6327 4 роки тому

      Going 70kph .....

    • @einar8019
      @einar8019 4 роки тому

      @@princessapplestrach6327 yes so does a leopard 2, abrams and so on and their 65 tonnes(strv122)

    • @juliuss2056
      @juliuss2056 4 роки тому +1

      They are Main battle tanks though, not infantry fighting vehicles lmao

  • @TADP0LE9806
    @TADP0LE9806 4 роки тому +1

    I'd be interested to see more IFV vids. I'll watch any AFV video in general really, doesn't just have to be tanks :)

  • @mecadragoon
    @mecadragoon Рік тому +2

    would the ammo being only in the turret limit the capacity?

  • @jestemzpolski8558
    @jestemzpolski8558 4 роки тому +7

    Where is intro?

  • @cccc285
    @cccc285 4 роки тому +5

    W-wait... There's a modern puma?!

    • @FirstDagger
      @FirstDagger 4 роки тому +7

      I guess you have been living under a rock. Schützenpanzer Puma is in service with the Bundeswehr since 2015.

    • @cccc285
      @cccc285 4 роки тому

      @@FirstDagger apperently so, more of an WW1 and 2 person so that's probably why

    • @JjjCDsjsjshs
      @JjjCDsjsjshs 4 роки тому +3

      @@FirstDagger puma is in service but as far as i know its not combat ready yet. Too many technical issues...

    • @shashanksekuri7231
      @shashanksekuri7231 4 роки тому +2

      @@cccc285 there is only one puma we know and love....also known as the
      *SCHWERE PANZERSPÄHWAGON MIT 7,5 CM SONDERKRAFTFAHRZEUG 234/4 PANZERABWEHRKANONEWAGON*

  • @persistentapparartionkitty5830
    @persistentapparartionkitty5830 3 роки тому +2

    Santa scratches his head every time he reads my Xmas list!

  • @g_op694
    @g_op694 4 роки тому

    Good look into the vehicle, acctualy learned more abt it. If you ask me i think doing reviews on IFV's is also quality content :)

  • @niko7626
    @niko7626 4 роки тому +31

    I would say the Puma is better when you look at the changeable armor, the high technology built in it and more numbers than t-15. Its also intergrated in the german way of how the tanks, Panzergrenadiers and other armored forces work with each other.

    • @MykolaSternenkoDroneBoyHoleMan
      @MykolaSternenkoDroneBoyHoleMan 4 роки тому +13

      Puna is top of the class. But I do think T-15 has more modularity as it was built around it. It's a lego on tracks. Technology should be decent on Russian one as this was priority. And how do German system work? Russia already using battle management systems and it was also one the reasons Russia went to Syria to test it (battle management systems, not IFVs)

    • @JjjCDsjsjshs
      @JjjCDsjsjshs 4 роки тому +6

      I think the puma has no aps system yet. As long as this is the case my money is on the t15. But maybe they will add trophy or a hopefully a german aps system later on

    • @henriks2708
      @henriks2708 4 роки тому +3

      so an ifv is better because it's produced in more numbers?

    • @antimatter4733
      @antimatter4733 4 роки тому +4

      I don't think the number in existence influences how good a tank or ifv is, if that was the case the M3 would be the best ifv

    • @firma_quia_verum
      @firma_quia_verum 4 роки тому

      @@antimatter4733 make sense

  • @orangecat3021
    @orangecat3021 4 роки тому +4

    Make a video on Singapore’s armored vehicles like Bionix, Hunter, Bronco etc

  • @kobusdowney5291
    @kobusdowney5291 4 роки тому

    Nice! Glad you are covering more than tanks. Please do more light vehicles, such as South Africa's Rooikat.

  • @BenVaserlan
    @BenVaserlan 4 роки тому

    There is a video called "T-15 Armata HIFV: New 57mm Kinzhal Turret & See Inside the Hull" - that goes well with this very good video by RedEffect above. :)
    The 57mm turret shown at "Army 2019" is different from the one shown at "Army 2018". I compare the turrets side-by-side in the video.

  • @timokocian4769
    @timokocian4769 4 роки тому +5

    Damn boi he thicc

  • @gr1mrea9er82
    @gr1mrea9er82 2 роки тому +3

    Never proven in battle, less than 30 in existence. What are the data points for your assessment of referring to it as the best IFV in the world ?

    • @mbtenjoyer9487
      @mbtenjoyer9487 2 роки тому +6

      The vehicle stats

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 Рік тому +2

      @@mbtenjoyer9487 But even the stats don't make it the best IFV in the world, that's the funny part.

  • @MatoVuc
    @MatoVuc 4 роки тому +1

    I would quite like it if you could do an as detailed as possible report on the Boomerang and Kurganets-25. I pretty much know everything I need to know about the BMP and BTR series thus far, but you seem to always have cool unseen info on these new russian vehicles

  • @maximecarpentier9597
    @maximecarpentier9597 4 роки тому +2

    I would be interested in a puma video too

  • @julianfitz806
    @julianfitz806 2 роки тому +4

    "Suppricing" that we dont see this paper tiger in Ukraine. PErhups it was just a paper tiger

    • @rogue__agent5884
      @rogue__agent5884 2 роки тому

      Why would they send it in when it’s in low numbers

    • @julianfitz806
      @julianfitz806 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@rogue__agent5884 We are 2 years and a military buildup later. Still the number is to low to use it in the (hopefully) only major war of the century = paper tiger

    • @rogue__agent5884
      @rogue__agent5884 2 роки тому

      @@julianfitz806 1 russia isn’t mass producing them because there factories are still busy making stuff for export
      2 they don’t to lose export customers by only focusing on there own army and not focusing on export
      3 it’s hard to produce because this is one of the most expensive tanks in the world
      This tank It’s Quality over quantity

    • @imightbearacist6613
      @imightbearacist6613 2 роки тому +2

      @@julianfitz806 the thing isnt approved for production, like the T14, just because you see it in a parade, doesnt mean its in service

    • @thekristler6865
      @thekristler6865 Рік тому

      @@imightbearacist6613 yep like the Abrams X, it was shown but not produced or in service

  • @matyasvasnovsky6934
    @matyasvasnovsky6934 2 роки тому +3

    Nice vehicle. As for usual it is rather technological demonstrator due to Russias inability to manufacture basically anything...

  • @MrScaryplayer
    @MrScaryplayer 4 роки тому

    Love the video, you should do one on the Puma

  • @user-oi8nm1sy1d
    @user-oi8nm1sy1d 3 роки тому +1

    I love how he says "very good"

  • @ghostmourn
    @ghostmourn 4 роки тому +3

    "Building a prototype is easy, mass production is hard." How many have been made? You notice that we keep seeing all this amazing boutique hardware from country's but they never go into mass production? Your good opinion should not be so easily given, it should be earned.

    • @ArghastOfTheAlliance
      @ArghastOfTheAlliance 4 роки тому +2

      Geez, are you a high school yankee patriot getting triggered about anything Russian made? The video is about purely technical considerations of the design itself, not about operational or economic ones. Chill the hell down.

  • @dreamcrusher112
    @dreamcrusher112 4 роки тому +4

    Russia has some pretty good vehicle designs but they are just too poor to realise them lol

    • @einar8019
      @einar8019 4 роки тому

      yeah, russia is gonna have like 100 of them at most

    • @utaMAN12345
      @utaMAN12345 4 роки тому +2

      Russian can't print unlimited money like the US does, and it ain't the soviet union so it can ignores other problem and just focus on military

    • @nemisous83
      @nemisous83 4 роки тому

      @@einar8019 if that, the plant to build Armata series hasnt even been built meanwhile Russia just signed a contract for T-90M, T-72B3M, T-80BVM, BMP-3M and BMPT-72 so its safe to say Armata series will likely be shelved and the tech retrofitted to the listed tanks.

    • @bezahltersystemtroll5055
      @bezahltersystemtroll5055 4 роки тому

      maybe we can do a crowdfunding

  • @e.r95
    @e.r95 3 роки тому

    So futuristic and epic👌👌👌

  • @DJGuppy321
    @DJGuppy321 3 роки тому +1

    I'm really hoping the American OMFV and MPF projects are successfully developed and adopted. I'd love to see them on the channel someday.

  • @andrewholdaway813
    @andrewholdaway813 4 роки тому +7

    Looks like a massive ungainly monstrosity to me.
    Only a handful of them? What a surprise.

    • @andrewholdaway813
      @andrewholdaway813 4 роки тому

      @vann tedd
      Good, should make easy meat should the occasion arise.

    • @yanuchiuchihaanimegamesand3907
      @yanuchiuchihaanimegamesand3907 4 роки тому +1

      @@andrewholdaway813 You do realize that it's on par with, if not better than, the Puma?

    • @andrewholdaway813
      @andrewholdaway813 4 роки тому

      @@yanuchiuchihaanimegamesand3907
      I am judging it in absolute, not relative, terms.

    • @einar8019
      @einar8019 4 роки тому

      @vann tedd lmao, russias economy is in the shitter

    • @einar8019
      @einar8019 4 роки тому +1

      @vann tedd theyve planned 100 if theyre gonna hit 1000 theyre gonna have to wait till like 2100

  • @Jackulator77
    @Jackulator77 2 роки тому +4

    Not a single second I am believing this thing does well in real conditions! Ukrain war revealed, that:
    1.) Russia has not much modern equipp - they went into that war with utterly old stuff and even the fewer modern ones lacked most capabilities it was said they got (example : Reactive armor - it was either not properly installed or simply didn't work..).
    2.) Russia proved, that all their most modern eqippment didn't work as supposed under real conditions (best example: encryped communication - it didn't work in ukrain so they had to use unencrypted radio or mobile phones!)
    3.) all highend systems use modern chips that russia can't and isn't producing themselves - they can not get these in high numbers especially since the sanctions are in place
    4.) russia totally lacks money to produce modern equippment, they can hardly keep the old stuff rolling!
    Puma is the most advanced IVF on the market - I wouldn't even put the T15 into top 5.

    • @Creppystories123
      @Creppystories123 2 роки тому +1

      They have allot of modern equipment

    • @imightbearacist6613
      @imightbearacist6613 2 роки тому +2

      Puma is the most advance IFV in the world, its so advance it cant carry infantry over 6ft tall lmao

    • @Jackulator77
      @Jackulator77 2 роки тому

      @@Creppystories123 proof? Wjere is it? The most important war they fight of the last 30 years is all old stuff that gets blown up by old RPGs... So where is it "if" they hafvfe it?

    • @Creppystories123
      @Creppystories123 2 роки тому

      @@Jackulator77 They have both old and new equipment

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 2 роки тому +1

      @@imightbearacist6613 Puma can carry Infantrymen over 6ft tall. However the mine protection seats require a little bit more clearance above the head to work most efficently, so the German Army put a height restriction.
      *The T-15 doesen't have mine protection seats to begin with* . In fact it probably doesen't have any mine protection at all.

  • @guanjun1178
    @guanjun1178 4 роки тому +1

    It would be great if you included IFV and APC platforms for review on your channel.

  • @richardbradley2335
    @richardbradley2335 4 роки тому +2

    its bloody huge.

  • @Abluemoon9112
    @Abluemoon9112 Рік тому +3

    This video age like milk lol.

    • @Fred_the_1996
      @Fred_the_1996 Рік тому +1

      why exactly?

    • @Abluemoon9112
      @Abluemoon9112 Рік тому +3

      @@Fred_the_1996 the T-15 does not exist that is why. It has yet to be fielded and battle tested. You can't call something the best when it doesn't even exist. We now know the Russian MOD exaggerates the spec of their weapons and red effect is an idiot for making those videos.

  • @rawpotatofella9654
    @rawpotatofella9654 2 роки тому +3

    So why haven’t we seen these in Ukraine???

  • @FACKnHEAD1
    @FACKnHEAD1 4 роки тому

    I love IFVs and small light tanks. The idea of them is really interesting to me

    • @billwhoever2830
      @billwhoever2830 2 роки тому

      This is not a light vehicle, it's a super heavy apc, when operating with your best troops in the most dangerous environments

  • @kasrkin519
    @kasrkin519 4 роки тому +1

    What is the vehicle behind T15 at 2:16?

  • @ethanmac639
    @ethanmac639 Рік тому +3

    t-15 is better than the puma

    • @germanboy7673
      @germanboy7673 Рік тому +2

      On paper

    • @cartman19892
      @cartman19892 Рік тому

      Puma at least exists. T15 is just a paper tank for parades

    • @ethanmac639
      @ethanmac639 Рік тому +1

      man i cannot wait till i see the T-15 HIFV absolutely demolish western ifv's in WW3! they are saving the for WW3 smart guy! DRRRR🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤

    • @chrishansen456
      @chrishansen456 Рік тому

      @@ethanmac639 I hope you are a casualty of WWIII.

    • @thekristler6865
      @thekristler6865 Рік тому

      @@chrishansen456 I feel like he was being sarcastic and perhaps being a loon but a death threat isn’t very fond of you, perhaps you might die in it too ( if you are in a targeted city by ICBMs then perhaps)

  • @bobincognito6239
    @bobincognito6239 Рік тому +5

    I don't really get how a vehicle which will never be produced (so never exist) can be considered as the best at anything.
    I also strongly disagree that this could be the best IFV. An IFV purpose isn't to be as protected as a tank and honestly the war in Ukraine showed how inexistant russian quality is.

  • @Wick9876
    @Wick9876 6 днів тому

    "We will have to see how their production will develop in the future. That will be all" and so it was.

  • @tim8938
    @tim8938 Рік тому

    This video aged like fine milk, so many T15/T14 driving around with working APS