The movie depicts donald raping his ex-wife, which was a claim made by his ex wife during their divorce proceedings. she later stated that she made the rape up because she wanted to make the divorce messier
@@silhouettefilms. she didn’t say the incident was made up. In her 2015 statement she said she felt violated but would characterize it as a rape anymore because Don was running for president at the time and didn’t want to hurt his campaign. Given the fact trumps been found liable for sexual assault and has been accused by over 2 dozen women of rape it seems legit bro.
@@anthonybretti’m out man. He was on epstein island for group fun with kids according to eye witness testimony in a florida court. The victims had to sue for violations of their constitutional rights via a hush order thanks to derschowitz. Hilary molested her marine WH guards. Its a horror film bro. Theyd show the long list of ‘accidental’ deaths in their sphere.
Primary Colors did kind of show him as scummy but not a monster. Kind of treaded lightly. Although I do remember they showed a certain staff member have an "accident" in the movie. But Hollywood will never show you anything about the "real" Clintons.
Before long you'll be able to prompt AI on verifiable facts surrounding the Clintons and making a movie in which you need to apply ever more mental gymnastics to see them as the good guys.
God, just that thumbnail. If Disney were smart, they'd have given us an entire SW trilogy with Sebastain Stan as Luke Skywalker in his adventures after the original trilogy. Or at the very least, James Cameron needs to give us a Terminator Future War prequel that shows the last weeks of Kyle Reese's life and the end of the war against the machines before he goes back in time to protect Sarah Connor.
I would have camped out to see that Stan as Luke in a film adaptation Heir to the Empire. But Disney gave us shit that I didn’t see until it was on cable because it looked too dumb to directly spend my money on.
The one scene they won't talk about, both he and his wife denied it. I believe it was a rumor for years. This scene alone make the movie a hit piece. Wait for it to be the only thing brought up about the movie during promotion. I suspect there are other things in the movie that fit the hit piece definition.
It’s not like it’s some baseless rumour invented out of thin air. His wife didn’t just make the accusation, she described it in exhaustive detail in a sworn deposition. She later recanted. So she was definitely lying at some stage. But it’s an open question as to which bit was the lie: the initial accusation (made in the midst of a bitter divorce), or the recantation (made in the context of having reached an agreement that netted her an enormous divorce settlement)
@@fromchomleystreet still baseless. Both parties say it didn't happen. The film makers have no proof otherwise. Putting it in the movie is just hurt Trump and his campaign. Like the movie it serves no other purpose.
Roy Cohn wasn't just an attorney. He got his start as the lead counsel for Senator Joe McCarthy during the McCarthy Era. He went after communists and gay people in government. He was also a closeted homosexual. After the McCarthy thing went down in flames he moved to New York and ended up becoming a mob lawyer. He was a lawyer at various times for nearly every major crime family in NYC. While he was a mob lawyer, he was also mentoring Trump. And anyone who thinks there weren't connections made between Trump and the mob at this time is a fool.
You know, in 2016 I really thought his campaign was a publicity stunt. I thought "They're Going To Do The Next Season Of The Apprentice Is Going To Be In DC, So He's Pretending To Run For President For A Month Or Two"
Ever wonder why Hollywood don't do biopics on Democrat Presidents? Because they suck and have no sense of humor. Reagan is a biopic, The Apprentice, W., the Dick Chaney biopic, etc.
@@b-zoneonroku2020 Aleksandr Feklisov, a retired KGB agent, said in 1997 when he admitted that he had been Julius’s handler. Feklisov agreed that Julius had passed on military secrets but, “he didn’t understand anything about the atomic bomb, and he couldn’t help us”. Ethel, he said, “had nothing to do with this, she was completely innocent. I think she knew [what her husband was doing], but for that you don’t kill people.”
@@b-zoneonroku2020 Feklisov, who met with Rosenberg frequently between 1943 and 1946, said the execution of Ethel Rosenberg was particularly unfair since, he insisted, she had not actively spied herself.Although Feklisov had the most direct contact with the Rosenbergs, he was not the first Soviet official to confirm that Julius Rosenberg stole secrets. In his memoirs, former Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev wrote that the Rosenbergs “provided very significant help in accelerating the production of our atomic bomb.” Kelkisov gestured impatiently at this notion. “Khrushchev was a silly man - he didn’t understand anything,” he said. Other retired KGB officials who have written more recent memoirs have confirmed that they were spies, but, like Feklisov, they denied that the Rosenbergs had provided any valuable atomic secrets. Feklisov said that in 1944 Rosenberg had given him a radar-controlled proximity fuse, vital in developing the Soviet air-to-surface missiles. But he said that, in his view, stealing this technology was not a capital offense. “During the war, they arrested packs of German spies, and not one was executed,” he growled. Referring to Klaus Fuchs, the German-born nuclear physicist, who was a crucial figure in supplying Moscow with a blueprint for America’s atomic bomb, he added, “Fuchs, who told us everything about Los Alamos, got only 14 years, and there is no comparison in what they did.”
I mean he could play both but woke Disney isn’t gonna make good choices. In fact they work pretty hard to avoid anyhting real Star Wars fans would want. He’s interesting as Bucky as well and should have been the next captain America a cool darker tortured counter point had all this history with Cap and now has become his opposite and yet must take on his mantle like that’s way more interesting than look black bird guy is doing it and he’s defending terrorists and saying they aren’t terrorists and vaguely lecturing people to do better with no specific advice.
Suprised to see a movie about Trump that isn't a hit piece. That alone makes me interested to see it. I don't need it being pro trump, just be a movie that shows him as a human. I don't care about him cheating on his wife since i assume all rich people do that. lol
I was in the appartment of a co founder of croc shoes in telluride who had blow and friends wives over for hedonism and blow. I ended up in a convo with one who was waiting for me to realize what was actually going on in the other rooms. With my married boss no less. I’m married and a good person so i skipped it. But. Yes
Gently disagree. This is a hit piece through and through. Every time we see a sliver of humanity in the on-screen Trump it's followed by a moment showing his evil side. It happens so often that it could be a great drinking game.
That is someone pretending to be what he really isn't. The movie shows how he learned to play act when on stage and with the media to fool next to everyone and intimidate the rest.
It’s a good movie. The SA scene was just bizarre though and kinda lost me. Like up until then I was thinking how good the acting and direction was, after I was just back in the real world. Two people in my screening walked out before it happened and I wonder if that was the thing they were looking for.
When I saw Donald Trump in Home Alone 2, I wanted more! I heard he's in Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. I want to watch it but I guess I can't because I've been told I'm racist.
You had me at this is like Batman Begins 😂👍 The scene you’re alluding to was recanted by his ex wife who has long passed. They should’ve taken that out, but other than that it seems like an interesting watch the way you described it in your review. I’ll consider watching this.
@@Red-zh7vq The claim his ex wife made in a book I believe she later in life said never actually happened. She claimed her ex husband r*ped her. The film decided to depict this even though like I said, she recanted what she said.
@@Fatdecember she never retracted the story. She agreed to stop using the word "rape", and was true to her word; she followed those instructions to the letter, for the rest of her life - but she did not agree to retract the story. The story remained - remains - a part of record. That's why the filmmaker felt it had to be in there; it would be odd not to include it *because* it is in record.
Thank you Alan, thank you Chris, this is why I now like President Donald John Trump, he isn’t perfect, he’s flawed. Just like the rest of us ‘normal people’. Definitely will watch it, even though I disagree with the particulars of, ‘that scene’.
Sorry to disagree. I have never sexual assaulted someone or committed 34 counts of fraud. Nor have I bankrupt multiple casinos, cheated on a wife with a porn star and then pay off said porn star. I have never stole money from a charity. I have never bragged that I can grab anybody by the pussy and they just let me. I have never buried my wife on a golf course I own for tax reasons. Oh and the way Trump talks about his own daughter. I am glad I am not what you consider, normal. Feck that.
The biggest crime is that Disney+ had Sebastian Stan on their roster, and we didn't get a Luke movie with Mara Jade. Instead, we got a hastily miscast and badly fumbled Han origin story.
Not a hit piece?? What?? Are you serious?? It's bloody damning as Hell!! Makes him likeable! What!? No way! Imagine a Kamala Harris movie in this vein. We hate her even more. C'mon! That's why Trump is suing the film makers! Sheese!
Also fun fact Trump was sent to military school after being expelled from his NY private school because of a bad temper! He was never ever meek like this movie portrays.
It tells you bad things he may have done, none of which should surprise anybody. And you shouldn’t care. They go out there way to show a SA though which really rubbed me the wrong way.
I don’t want to see a trump movie. I don’t want to see an Obama or Biden movie. I think I’d like a Perot or Nader biopic, either would be interesting but I don’t trust Hollywood to make it
D.O.A. Who green lit this disaster?? If this movie comes out after Trump is re-elected it makes money!!! Releasing it now was incredibly foolish!!! 20Million loss could have been averted by holding this until February 2025
Not according to me who saw it also. It actually is surprising sympathetic to both Trump and Cohn in certain parts of the film and shows the problem that this bad behavior is a product of American capitalism and what you have to do win at all costs.
@@b-zoneonroku2020 You do understand Trump was convicted of 34 counts of business fraud right just recently. Donald Trump often portrays himself as a savior of the working class who will "protect your job." But a USA TODAY analysis found he has been involved in more than 3,500 lawsuits over the past three decades - and a large number of those involve ordinary Americans who worked for or were contracted to build who say Trump or his companies have refused to pay them. Then add the mountain of swindling his father Fred did. In January 1966, New York state investigators caught up with real estate developer Fred Trump. At a televised hearing of the State Investigations Commission, they asked him about the $21,000 he billed the state to lease a $3,600 dump truck and the $8,280 tile scrapers that actually cost $500 apiece for some of the many developments he built with financial support from the city, state and federal governments. The New York state Department of Taxation and Finance announced Tuesday that it would open an investigation into the Trump family’s shenanigans. “President Donald Trump and his siblings could owe New York state more than $400 million in unpaid taxes, interest and penalties.” Those are public facts. Can't hide from them
Woke. Woke. WOKE. If I do not agree with it, it is WOKE! That word has lost all meaning. And the funny thing is, you never knew the meaning of the word in the first place. You puppet.
Well, that "one scene" was something Ivana wrote about in one of her books...only 2 people in the room, so they're the only ones who would know if it was true or not.
but the movie had to do it to bash trump. A responsible story teller wouldn't put that in as questionable for a biopic. Not seeing this. It's blatant dishonesty while saying the other guy is a liar. Saul Alinksy crap.
@@erjo2567 There is a difference between criticism and being "anti." Everything has been anti-Trump for eaight years, why would they have any reason to assume a Hollywood movie would suddenly be a fair observation? That's not the same thing.
It doesn't matter whether this movie is any good or not. There's many people that are absolutely sick of seeing this guy's name and face everywhere. 20 years ago it might have been interesting movie to check out. Today, if I could go a whole day without hearing his name come up, that would truly make America great.
I'd rather not stick my head in the sand, and it's always good to be informed. But even IF I stopped watching the news, as you can see, it's not so simple to avoid his name coming up in nearly every capacity imaginable (i.e. Film Threat movie review)
@@deeesher Trust me, the news cycle of tomorrow will probably be exactly the same as today. Take a day away from TV and the Internet. I can't promise complete serenity, but it might be close.
Just to be clear, I'm not someone who wallows in news and social media. I very much limit news intake to a few minutes a day at most just to catch the highlights. Even my socials I only spend a few minutes a day on. But there's a cult of people obsessed with him and that's what bothers me most. It's not something you can just avoid despite my best efforts.
@@deeesher "But there's a cult of people obsessed with him and that's what bothers me most". Now ask yourself why (the underlying reasons why ppl are obsessed with him and why it should ever "bother" you in any way, shape or form).
The movie depicts donald raping his ex-wife, which was a claim made by his ex wife during their divorce proceedings. she later stated that she made the rape up because she wanted to make the divorce messier
@@silhouettefilms. she didn’t say the incident was made up. In her 2015 statement she said she felt violated but would characterize it as a rape anymore because Don was running for president at the time and didn’t want to hurt his campaign. Given the fact trumps been found liable for sexual assault and has been accused by over 2 dozen women of rape it seems legit bro.
In light of that, the brief scene is more of a mutual hate sex moment in a failing marriage.
Good question. Not only that, but how about a movie about the real Bill Clinton.
I'm in... as long as its X-rated.
@@anthonybretti’m out man. He was on epstein island for group fun with kids according to eye witness testimony in a florida court. The victims had to sue for violations of their constitutional rights via a hush order thanks to derschowitz.
Hilary molested her marine WH guards.
Its a horror film bro. Theyd show the long list of ‘accidental’ deaths in their sphere.
They have a ton of them on Xhamster
Who should play Vince Foster?
Primary Colors did kind of show him as scummy but not a monster. Kind of treaded lightly. Although I do remember they showed a certain staff member have an "accident" in the movie. But Hollywood will never show you anything about the "real" Clintons.
I hope I outlive the Clintons so I can watch THAT movie.
Before long you'll be able to prompt AI on verifiable facts surrounding the Clintons and making a movie in which you need to apply ever more mental gymnastics to see them as the good guys.
They still protect JFK 61 years after his death so I don't think a Clintons expose is ever happening.
shhh, she's watching. always
@Veteran_Nerd Worry not. I can smell them comming.
Never gonna happen.
God, just that thumbnail. If Disney were smart, they'd have given us an entire SW trilogy with Sebastain Stan as Luke Skywalker in his adventures after the original trilogy. Or at the very least, James Cameron needs to give us a Terminator Future War prequel that shows the last weeks of Kyle Reese's life and the end of the war against the machines before he goes back in time to protect Sarah Connor.
Why are you saying things that are impossible to happen. I know there's an "if" there.
I would have camped out to see that Stan as Luke in a film adaptation Heir to the Empire. But Disney gave us shit that I didn’t see until it was on cable because it looked too dumb to directly spend my money on.
What does this have to do with the Trump movie!
Surprised by this review. I’m definitely more interested in seeing it now. Was pretty sure it was just gonna be a hit piece.
You and me both!
@@FilmThreat Do you think that either actor or the director will lose work for doing this film?
It is, but FT states on their website that they WILL take money for reviews, so! SHILLS! It's a BUSINESS babay!!!!
It’s probably still 70% hit piece. Hollywood ain’t releasing this a month out for no reason.
@@JasonAkersMusicif it's a hit they will.
The one scene they won't talk about, both he and his wife denied it. I believe it was a rumor for years. This scene alone make the movie a hit piece. Wait for it to be the only thing brought up about the movie during promotion.
I suspect there are other things in the movie that fit the hit piece definition.
What scene?
@@cameronscott7304 it is a r@pe scene of his wife.
It’s not like it’s some baseless rumour invented out of thin air. His wife didn’t just make the accusation, she described it in exhaustive detail in a sworn deposition. She later recanted. So she was definitely lying at some stage. But it’s an open question as to which bit was the lie: the initial accusation (made in the midst of a bitter divorce), or the recantation (made in the context of having reached an agreement that netted her an enormous divorce settlement)
@@fromchomleystreet still baseless. Both parties say it didn't happen. The film makers have no proof otherwise. Putting it in the movie is just hurt Trump and his campaign. Like the movie it serves no other purpose.
@@blackrazer22 In light of that, the brief scene is more of a mutual hate sex moment in a failing marriage.
Idris Elba should play BIG MIKE,
Now, I can see why you commented on that. Idris is a dead ringer for Big Mike.
Grow up
@@suspiciousinternetfinds4296 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 … spoken with the skill of a democrat ⚓️❤️⚓️
@@suspiciousinternetfinds4296 Don't cry sweetie.
@@suspiciousinternetfinds4296 Don't cry sweetie.
Roy Cohn wasn't just an attorney. He got his start as the lead counsel for Senator Joe McCarthy during the McCarthy Era. He went after communists and gay people in government. He was also a closeted homosexual. After the McCarthy thing went down in flames he moved to New York and ended up becoming a mob lawyer. He was a lawyer at various times for nearly every major crime family in NYC. While he was a mob lawyer, he was also mentoring Trump. And anyone who thinks there weren't connections made between Trump and the mob at this time is a fool.
You know, in 2016 I really thought his campaign was a publicity stunt. I thought "They're Going To Do The Next Season Of The Apprentice Is Going To Be In DC, So He's Pretending To Run For President For A Month Or Two"
I really thought this movie was about the time during the show he did😂😂😂
It's a Dem hit piece. I'm looking forward to The Little St. James Island movie featuring Bill Clinton's time -share apartment there.
Ever wonder why Hollywood don't do biopics on Democrat Presidents? Because they suck and have no sense of humor. Reagan is a biopic, The Apprentice, W., the Dick Chaney biopic, etc.
That is a good point
Trump talked about his brother on Theo Von and said that’s why he never got into drugs and alcohol.
James Woods plays Roy in a movie from waaay back! I seem to remember it was really good!
except for the sheer lack of accuracy. The Rosenbergs were guilty as sin, Kruschev even said so. The movie claims they were innocent and railroaded.
@@b-zoneonroku2020
Aleksandr Feklisov, a retired KGB agent, said in 1997 when he admitted that he had been Julius’s handler. Feklisov agreed that Julius had passed on military secrets but, “he didn’t understand anything about the atomic bomb, and he couldn’t help us”. Ethel, he said, “had nothing to do with this, she was completely innocent. I think she knew [what her husband was doing], but for that you don’t kill people.”
@@raymondsmith6870 That's not what Kruschev said in his memoirs. He stated that the Rosenbergs out and out gave him the bomb.
@@b-zoneonroku2020
Feklisov, who met with Rosenberg frequently between 1943 and 1946, said the execution of Ethel Rosenberg was particularly unfair since, he insisted, she had not actively spied herself.Although Feklisov had the most direct contact with the Rosenbergs, he was not the first Soviet official to confirm that Julius Rosenberg stole secrets.
In his memoirs, former Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev wrote that the Rosenbergs “provided very significant help in accelerating the production of our atomic bomb.” Kelkisov gestured impatiently at this notion. “Khrushchev was a silly man - he didn’t understand anything,” he said.
Other retired KGB officials who have written more recent memoirs have confirmed that they were spies, but, like Feklisov, they denied that the Rosenbergs had provided any valuable atomic secrets.
Feklisov said that in 1944 Rosenberg had given him a radar-controlled proximity fuse, vital in developing the Soviet air-to-surface missiles. But he said that, in his view, stealing this technology was not a capital offense. “During the war, they arrested packs of German spies, and not one was executed,” he growled. Referring to Klaus Fuchs, the German-born nuclear physicist, who was a crucial figure in supplying Moscow with a blueprint for America’s atomic bomb, he added, “Fuchs, who told us everything about Los Alamos, got only 14 years, and there is no comparison in what they did.”
Written by an MSNBC contributor, directed by an Iranian....sounds legit
The film doesn’t work unless they gave in and humanize the Orange Man a bit, and they do.
He was supposed to play Luke Skywalker not Donald Trump! WTF?
I guess the "force" was never with him
I mean he could play both but woke Disney isn’t gonna make good choices. In fact they work pretty hard to avoid anyhting real Star Wars fans would want. He’s interesting as Bucky as well and should have been the next captain America a cool darker tortured counter point had all this history with Cap and now has become his opposite and yet must take on his mantle like that’s way more interesting than look black bird guy is doing it and he’s defending terrorists and saying they aren’t terrorists and vaguely lecturing people to do better with no specific advice.
@@ComeAlongKay Captain can't be a former assassin
Trump is the new Chosen One. 😂
@@marshallnmoonshine over my dead bodt
When the “Heels Up “ documentary?
It’s on pornhub, in the categories.
donOLD tRump does Inside Edition
@@portiamarie3713 good one 🙄 you voted for Biden and didn’t care his ancient he was . Double standard ? Yeah
@@AverageJoe483 Don't get thing's fukd up lil joe average ... I am a republican👼🏼 ... Not to be confused with a republikkkan
🍊🤡❄️
⛑️👻 🤏🏼🍄
Kamala's documentary will soon be available on adult websites.
How much are we gonna have to bribe Jeremy from Geeks and Gamers to go see it though…?
The should make a sequel with him running for President 🤣
The casting was superb.
Who asked for this? Nobody. How about Hillary C and the case of the red handkerchiefs.
The soundtrack was the best. It’s was a whole vibe
Great review. You're not fired!
Where’s the Joe Biden movie? lol
It's called "Birth of a Nation."
"The Mummy"
Weekend at Bernie's
He's not interesting enough
A Christmas Carol withGeorge C Scott
Have you seen Reagan yet? Or did I miss that review?
He looks like a young ducky from NCIS, but when ducky was in the man from uncle
Jeremy Strong was hilarious.
Without being an ass....
I'll just say that my fellow local MI news reporter, "Critic Lee" or Lee Thomas" gave the movie a thumbs up.
I wonder what that one scene is?
My guess is where Trump gets liposuction.
The Orange Knight Rises
Would love to see a Star Wars spoof of this on SNL or something 🤣
Suprised to see a movie about Trump that isn't a hit piece. That alone makes me interested to see it.
I don't need it being pro trump, just be a movie that shows him as a human. I don't care about him cheating on his wife since i assume all rich people do that. lol
But is he a human with humanity 🧐 nope but he's a human nonetheless.
@@_GarethRossUKYou sound judgmental
I was in the appartment of a co founder of croc shoes in telluride who had blow and friends wives over for hedonism and blow. I ended up in a convo with one who was waiting for me to realize what was actually going on in the other rooms. With my married boss no less.
I’m married and a good person so i skipped it. But.
Yes
@@CScott-wh5yk not judemental its commentary much like the movie is.
Well it shows how he developed his lying style he uses to this day
Pass.
No interest. Real reason why it’s released now. A shame.
Gently disagree. This is a hit piece through and through. Every time we see a sliver of humanity in the on-screen Trump it's followed by a moment showing his evil side. It happens so often that it could be a great drinking game.
@@HollywoodinToto that’s who trump is. He is evil, ya dingus. He doesn’t give a fuck about you or me or anyone else but himself.
Why would I go to this movie when I can watch one of his rallies live on UA-cam?
That is someone pretending to be what he really isn't. The movie shows how he learned to play act when on stage and with the media to fool next to everyone and intimidate the rest.
@@raymondsmith6870 Yes. The movie is at a time when Trump was a Democrat and had Democrat values.
It’s a good movie. The SA scene was just bizarre though and kinda lost me. Like up until then I was thinking how good the acting and direction was, after I was just back in the real world. Two people in my screening walked out before it happened and I wonder if that was the thing they were looking for.
When I saw Donald Trump in Home Alone 2, I wanted more! I heard he's in Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. I want to watch it but I guess I can't because I've been told I'm racist.
James Woods starred in a Roy Cohen Flick. Citizen Cohen check it out
I'm Pro-Trump. I'm a fan since 2016 !
Problem I had with Quaid’s Reagan. Just an SNL caricature. Brosnan should have played him
You had me at this is like Batman Begins 😂👍
The scene you’re alluding to was recanted by his ex wife who has long passed. They should’ve taken that out, but other than that it seems like an interesting watch the way you described it in your review. I’ll consider watching this.
What scene?
What is the scene in question?
@@Red-zh7vq The claim his ex wife made in a book I believe she later in life said never actually happened. She claimed her ex husband r*ped her. The film decided to depict this even though like I said, she recanted what she said.
@@Fatdecember she never retracted the story. She agreed to stop using the word "rape", and was true to her word; she followed those instructions to the letter, for the rest of her life - but she did not agree to retract the story. The story remained - remains - a part of record. That's why the filmmaker felt it had to be in there; it would be odd not to include it *because* it is in record.
I thought both actors were fantastic!
This is a biased political movie.....wow a great endorsement, hard pass.
When they put out a biased Clinton movie I will give this a view.
The movie is from Trumps early life when he was a Democrat with Democrat values.
I totally respect Trump for his straight edge lifestyle.
The movie is about a time in Trumps life when he was a Democrat and had Democrat values.
Alan always goes far too much into detail when he describes a movie. I feel like I don't need to watch the movie no more.
Thank you Alan, thank you Chris, this is why I now like President Donald John Trump, he isn’t perfect, he’s flawed. Just like the rest of us ‘normal people’. Definitely will watch it, even though I disagree with the particulars of, ‘that scene’.
If that's normal for you I pity anyone you have a relationship with.
@@PrivateBenjamin-vw8xy 35 years married … 4 successful kids … all trained in the use of firearms …😉 Private Benjamin, I wish you all the very best 🫡
Sorry to disagree. I have never sexual assaulted someone or committed 34 counts of fraud. Nor have I bankrupt multiple casinos, cheated on a wife with a porn star and then pay off said porn star. I have never stole money from a charity. I have never bragged that I can grab anybody by the pussy and they just let me. I have never buried my wife on a golf course I own for tax reasons. Oh and the way Trump talks about his own daughter. I am glad I am not what you consider, normal. Feck that.
What’s the one part that will make Trump lovers mad?
@@jimmyblood3416 idk I havent seen the movie
Disagree, sounds like a hit piece. It just worked on you.
Saw the movie it was a hit piece
Roy Cone.🤟🏻
cohn oy vey
@@Mattened 🤟🏻
The biggest crime is that Disney+ had Sebastian Stan on their roster, and we didn't get a Luke movie with Mara Jade. Instead, we got a hastily miscast and badly fumbled Han origin story.
Not a hit piece?? What?? Are you serious?? It's bloody damning as Hell!! Makes him likeable! What!? No way! Imagine a Kamala Harris movie in this vein. We hate her even more. C'mon! That's why Trump is suing the film makers! Sheese!
Also fun fact Trump was sent to military school after being expelled from his NY private school because of a bad temper! He was never ever meek like this movie portrays.
It’s definitely a hit piece 👎🏾
It tells you bad things he may have done, none of which should surprise anybody. And you shouldn’t care. They go out there way to show a SA though which really rubbed me the wrong way.
I can't wait to see this movie about Donald Skywalker!
I don’t want to see a trump movie. I don’t want to see an Obama or Biden movie. I think I’d like a Perot or Nader biopic, either would be interesting but I don’t trust Hollywood to make it
Sounds interesting anything related to Trump I would just assume is just hit piece propaganda.
Great Film 👍🏼👍🏼
WAIT, you guys liked this shit. WOW!
Worth seeing! Maybe people saw the title and thought it was about the reality show. It’s not; but very real!
D.O.A. Who green lit this disaster?? If this movie comes out after Trump is re-elected it makes money!!! Releasing it now was incredibly foolish!!! 20Million loss could have been averted by holding this until February 2025
Who says that he is getting elected?
@@banhammer3904 the election results
Does Trump get royalties especially seeing they are using The Apprentice name?
So you basically need to be ambivalent towards Trump to see this
Two movies about former Republican American Presidents that are good. That's nice.
Sounds pretty good and interesting. I will definitely check it out!
FIRST MUST SEE MOVIE OF 2024
Ugh, another woke hit piece.
Not according to Alan, who saw it.
Not according to me who saw it also. It actually is surprising sympathetic to both Trump and Cohn in certain parts of the film and shows the problem that this bad behavior is a product of American capitalism and what you have to do win at all costs.
@@raymondsmith6870 In other words, woke as fuck. HARD pass.
@@b-zoneonroku2020
You do understand Trump was convicted of 34 counts of business fraud right just recently. Donald Trump often portrays himself as a savior of the working class who will "protect your job." But a USA TODAY analysis found he has been involved in more than 3,500 lawsuits over the past three decades - and a large number of those involve ordinary Americans who worked for or were contracted to build who say Trump or his companies have refused to pay them.
Then add the mountain of swindling his father Fred did. In January 1966, New York state investigators caught up with real estate developer Fred Trump. At a televised hearing of the State Investigations Commission, they asked him about the $21,000 he billed the state to lease a $3,600 dump truck and the $8,280 tile scrapers that actually cost $500 apiece for some of the many developments he built with financial support from the city, state and federal governments.
The New York state Department of Taxation and Finance announced Tuesday that it would open an investigation into the Trump family’s shenanigans. “President Donald Trump and his siblings could owe New York state more than $400 million in unpaid taxes, interest and penalties.”
Those are public facts. Can't hide from them
Woke. Woke. WOKE. If I do not agree with it, it is WOKE! That word has lost all meaning. And the funny thing is, you never knew the meaning of the word in the first place. You puppet.
Well, that "one scene" was something Ivana wrote about in one of her books...only 2 people in the room, so they're the only ones who would know if it was true or not.
but the movie had to do it to bash trump. A responsible story teller wouldn't put that in as questionable for a biopic. Not seeing this. It's blatant dishonesty while saying the other guy is a liar. Saul Alinksy crap.
@@michaelbuddyRight ? I can not imagine a man that grabbed women by the 🐈 WOULD EVVA LAY HANDS ON A WOMAN 😤 ...
it's🍊🤡❄️ a muh fukn ⛑️👻 with a 🤏🏼🍄
Ivana knew more than we think!
I am pretty far left and I loved this movie. It was a revelation and really explains how Trump ended up like he is today. Perfect.
Well that was a surprise. How did they even get this movie made if it doesn't eviscerate Trump?
That’s exactly why they were able to, what are you smoking?
MAGA2024
No thanks
Great review!
I wonder if they included scenes of him partying with Diddy and Epstein...
Trump did get hooked on speed aka weight loss pills.
Yawn
My conservative friends won't watch it because they assume it's anti-Trump
Do you blame them?
@@danielcraig9666 it's healthy for everyone to step out of their echo chamber
@@erjo2567 There is a difference between criticism and being "anti." Everything has been anti-Trump for eaight years, why would they have any reason to assume a Hollywood movie would suddenly be a fair observation? That's not the same thing.
It doesn't matter whether this movie is any good or not. There's many people that are absolutely sick of seeing this guy's name and face everywhere. 20 years ago it might have been interesting movie to check out. Today, if I could go a whole day without hearing his name come up, that would truly make America great.
Just don't watch the news, man. Easy peasy.
I'd rather not stick my head in the sand, and it's always good to be informed. But even IF I stopped watching the news, as you can see, it's not so simple to avoid his name coming up in nearly every capacity imaginable (i.e. Film Threat movie review)
@@deeesher Trust me, the news cycle of tomorrow will probably be exactly the same as today. Take a day away from TV and the Internet. I can't promise complete serenity, but it might be close.
Just to be clear, I'm not someone who wallows in news and social media. I very much limit news intake to a few minutes a day at most just to catch the highlights. Even my socials I only spend a few minutes a day on. But there's a cult of people obsessed with him and that's what bothers me most. It's not something you can just avoid despite my best efforts.
@@deeesher "But there's a cult of people obsessed with him and that's what bothers me most". Now ask yourself why (the underlying reasons why ppl are obsessed with him and why it should ever "bother" you in any way, shape or form).
Interesting? You guys are wading into political waters. Isn’t his moniker the ‘Orange Man’ ?🫡 🇺🇸
It's a film. It's their job to review films. Regardless of political views.
@@Keyblader001I thought Film Threat handled it professionally
Go say that on all reviews of this movie.
@@BamBamBigelow.. Plus or minus some gritted teeth :-D
Smh