The good dinosaur should've gotten the wall e treatment, little to no dialogue, just a human boy and a young dinosaur finding out they aren't that different
*The Good Dinosaur (actual version) score* Animation: 6 (while the backgrounds are not my absolute favourites, they still got the job done to be the closest thing to making TGD feel like a Pixar film with the power of modern CGI to make it look believable. If only the character designs, even if they were stylized which is fitting for a Pixar film, matched the photorealism of the film’s atmosphere) Story: 3 (to give it credit where credit is due, at least Arlo and Spot shared a touching bond... which could’ve been more if the movie were less disappointing) Characters: 4 (the only ones I really did like were the tyrannosauruses, but if only they had more screen time) *5/10 (it’s not the worst Pixar film, but it’s close)*
The scene where Spot explains what happened to his family and Arlo responds in kind about his father, all with little dialogue, was a tiny glimpse into what could've been
3:00 I'm sorry, but, this is objectively false. A vast majority of environments and stories being told in the Cars universe relates to both American and Automotive history, especially in regards to things like NASCAR, as American Automotives are a very rich culture that has a long history behind it. Radiator Springs for example is directly inspired by actual dying cities and routes from Route 66, the Piston Cup is a parallel to Grand Prix trophies, a large amount of cars are even voiced by racing or driving legends, and more. Obviously you could tell these stories with humans driving cars, but why not make it with sentient cars? That's just a lot funner and creative as it's very interesting to bring to life the various personalities of automobiles, like how Sally is a Porsche, despite originally being planned on being a Mustang, due to the fact that Porsches are a lot more feminine. Even little things like making tractors cattle is really interesting and creative. There isn't a point to overthinking it. by that, I mean, Car lovers tend to imprint personalities onto their vehicles, based on their condition, age, etc., in the same way that a child would imprint personalities onto their toys, so it makes sense to a certain degree as to why they would tell very human stories with anthromorphic cars; it's basically a romanticized story of what would happen if a car lover's cars actually were sentient, and the personalities we imprinted onto them became their actual living personalities. A way you could look at it is that it's effectively a human story of the driver's ambitions, told from the perspective of their cars. They obviously don't have to literally BE Cars, but if you think the franchise is bad for that reason, then you are missing the point of it, and the creativity factor of the franchise would be exceptionally dull if it wasn't using anthromorphic cars. Ironically, your mentality of "them being sentient cars has to actually be relevant to the plot" is something that lead to Cars 2, which is easily the worst movie in the franchise by a very large margin, by making various plot points explicitly depend on them being Cars. Even you attest to this. In Cars 3, keeping what I said in mind about it being a theoretical driver's ambitions told from the perspective of the Cars themselves, Lightning McQueen is getting old because he's an old NASCAR model. He isn't literally an old man; he is, instead, an outdated model being replaced by far more advanced technology than him. This is exactly what happened to Doc previously. This plot point is very clearly presented, I'm genuinely not sure why you missed that. Doc died because, in reality, even Cars stop working after a while. Doc was a 70 year old Hudson Hornet. There is only 19 Hudson Hornets left in real life due to the reality of automotives aging and deteriorating, and those 19 Hudson Hornets are requiring constant heavy maintenance to stay running. It really isn't a stretch to assume Doc simply succumbed to age and lack of maintenance considering they chose to live in the Desert for their last couple of decades. I think the real shortcoming is that there is far fewer passionate car lovers than toy lovers and such, especially with young people. These movies were made for car lovers who are passionate about cars and want to see their beloved hobby and inanimate objects they care about be brought to life. But, because of this, it kinda failed to find it's target audience since it was a Pixar film marketed towards kids. Cars 2 tried to address those two issues by both being explicitly made for kids and also directly tying the fact that they are cars into the plot, which sounded good on paper, but it ultimately fell completely flat by alienating it's existing fanbase, and Cars 3 was made to properly provide a send-off to the people who "got" it and really latched onto the movies. Even the characters themselves are testaments to Automotive History and every car brand was very deliberately picked, because every car in the movie needed to have a very rich and deep history behind it. I personally have a passionate fondness for vehicles. So Cars really stood out to me as an incredibly creative idea that brought beloved vehicles to life and showcased their history and what kind of personalities they would have if their drivers had their personalities imprinted into them. Of course it leads to all the funny hypothetical questions like "Where did all the humans go", "Why are these cities made for cars", etc., but if you ask that question seriously, and criticize the film for it, then you have missed the point of why it's the way that it is, y'know?
Theoretically, if someone were to stubbornly keep making replacement parts, a car could last forever. How many parts were left original, of course, would be in question
@@Appletank8 Well, theoretically, if you continued to replace humans with new organs, they could continue to live. Rich people are buying blood from young people. People recieve heart, kidney, blood marrow transplants. Still, people die of old age/heart disease/heart attacks/kidney failure/etc.
RoninHD that’s because unlike human organs car parts can theoretically be mass produced. Just dig up some Materials and boom, car parts. Also unlike human flesh metal decays slowly and can be taken out of the fixed and put back in. So yeah they at least would have a longer life span than a humans. If we believe that car WW|| happened around human WW|| than Sarge was only be 77 which is way to soon. In this essay I will
@@theteethburglar4716 Okay, but think about this. If you are constantly replacing the parts of a car, and you eventually replace every part of the car, is it the same car?
I know, but what's even worse, in the series Cars on the Road they have a monster truck. Do we even need to imagine how messed up that would be if we had an equivalent of a monster truck event in our world? (Well, okay, we do have an equivalent in our world, and it's called... a monster truck event, but you know what I mean. If we had a more exact 1-to-1 representation of what a monster truck event would be like in the Cars universe. Trucks roaring through a morgue, limbs and guts... Never mind.)
@@matthewmitchell3457 I suppose the human equivalent would be some fucked up Olympics where all enhancing/doping drugs and even body modifications are allowed and encouraged
In McQueen's defence, he was becoming outdated, and thus, getting old. The film plot already says that he can't keep up with the other racers who are fresher, more updated and better performing.
How are these cars born? Or made? I love cars but cars leavs you with more questions than anything else and it shouldn't even be that deep of a movie. XD
@@HadHadHad-A I think something like Robots? Where parents order a baby from an autoshop, adopt, then as they grow older they get upgrades and new parts.
@@crowthewicked8344 because “making the baby is the fun part” is an underrated line in animated movie history. And yeah that’s always how I assumed car babies are made
Exactly, Cars' concept isn't necessarily about cars, it's about a race driver learning to overcome his ego. Automobiles is a theming that simplifies the movie's concept and makes it more distinct. The second film was weird because it was trying to make a spy movie around the theme of cars.
According to transitive property, Tim McGraw's emotional rocker "Highway Don't Care" is a warning that life itself does not care about you. But he does, he does.
no one who enjoys the cars franchise thinks the worldbuilding is great lol, believe it or not, but people can enjoy a story without thinking too much of the complex world around it
@@tomascoelho5562 but cars 3 asks us to think about stuff like how is lighting mcqueen old which requires knowledge of motorsports which most kids don’t care about
For what it's worth, most cars "die" when they have parts breakages that'd be too expensive to repair, and get abandoned/ crushed. Not exactly a concept that'd work for the cars universe without a bit of existential horror
I like the mileage idea for universe aging. Could also make a certain part, like their engine, their "soul" which cannot be replaced; kind of like a human can't replace their brain.
@@farmerboy916 Funny enough, There is actually concept art for dead cars and a rough draft of a scene to go with it. It's been a long time since I've seen it but I remember it being really unsettling.
The thing about these movies is very clearly the writers didn't expect anyone older than ten to take a deeper look at them. Because if they did, they would have needed to consider that the locations all being 1:1 to real locations suggests that history is relatively unchanged. Meaning that there very well could have been a car Holocaust, a car Cold War, and a car 9/11.
I shit you not, in the spinoff movie Planes, there's literally a character who's a World War II veteran. They even show a flashback of him being a soldier during WWII. So yeah, Car Hitler probably existed. Now I wonder what type of Car he was.
The existence of the pope mobile implies that Catholicism exists in the Cars universe, which implies that there was a car Jesus who died on the cross for our vehicular sins.
In the Cars movies, the characters can be arrested for speeding. And since they are LIVING cars, it would be the same thing as getting arrested for running too fast.
Meanings behind the Cars movies: Cars 1: Slow down. Enjoy the simple things in life. Cars 2: *absolutely nothing* Cars 3: Accept to be yourself and acknowledge times are changing
I always thought Cars 2 was saying we all have our uses. Mater figured out the real villain when most people, even McQueen, thought he was a dumb hick.
Olive Oil I remember watching shark tales I had the dvd. Personally didn’t like it. Though it was a part of my childhood and I know it’s nostalgic to people
The unlucky tug actually brought up some good points in his big retrospective of these movies, like how cars 3 gives an actual purpose to them being cars, and how cars 2 is the reason why the world is confusing. It’s a good watch, I recommend it. I’m not saying it’ll change your mind about these movies, but it does answer some questions about these movies.
@@finaliestexactly. The whole point of the animation medium is to be more creative, more quirky, more abstract, etc. If you make every character a generic human being, that completely defeats the purpose, and you may as well have made it live action. It would've genuinely made the story more boring
@@pirate_cove_manI rlly like mr crab man schaff most of the time but this is easily his worst video ever. It gets so much wrong and this is probably the main video that tarnishes the whole franchise cause of how much insane terrible shit cars 2 did (dispite every thing with McQueen and the music being amazing)
Gabriel 2020 because cars just isn’t as good as the other Pixar films. The storyline is generic, the characters are pretty forgettable, and the soundtrack is meh. It isn’t a bad movie at all but it can’t possibly compare to movies like toy story, the incredibles, ratatouille, wall-E, Up, and even monsters inc
I watched the Cars franchise last month and it was far better than I expected it to be. You say that there’s no emotional moments but when he’s starts “fading fast” in Cars 3, it was a feeling of sadness that all sports fans have felt. Last year I watched Cristiano Ronaldo, a soccer icon for 20 years, play for Manchester United and he was so bad it was genuinely uncomfortable to watch. There’s nothing worse than that as a sports fan and that Cars 3 scene demonstrated it perfectly. That scene is used constantly on twitter too whenever a player has gotten too old.
Let's not forget doc Hudson's origin as a whole and radiator springs and how it died off. Lightning giving up the win so he could help strip weathers finish his last race was wholesome as hell
Honestly, the way I’ve always thought about it is that cars are appealing to kids. If Cars was made with humans, I think kids would be less interested, and this is important for more reasons than just money. I learned a lot from this movie as a kid about pride, not judging others, and living your life for more than just personal gain. If it was humans, I would have gotten bored and not cared when I was younger. So while being cars is far from integral to the plot, and this movie is far from like a masterpiece, that always counted for something to me
@@sheko1515 He's got alot more points then just that it's universe dosen't make sense and though I love Cars he's got a point Plus it's his opinion, trust me he knows what "unironic enjoyment" is
@@rommix0 Cars age faster when they're not used. Just the same way that a person who sits and does nothing will grow fat and their body decays. A car that sits without being driven experiences more rust and corrosion, gets eaten by miss and bugs and rodents, rubber parts decay, fluids separate and deteriorate, etc. Cars suffer from neglect more than all but the most outrageous abuse. Not unlike a child.
What they meant by McQueen "getting old" in the third one, in my opinion, is that the world of racing had evolved and it was all about high-tech, as shown by the antagonist and the training sequences, so he was obsolete.
I mean cars do get old in our world. You don't keep a car for very long, they wear out. Lighting is supposed to be an athlete and usually athletes retire at their late thirties so it makes sense.
Also think to the olympics. The older veteran who's still at the top of their game, but still can't compete with the new crowd, because the newer competitors get stronger and crazier every year
Buuuuuuut why didn't McQueen ever try to like change his engine or something, it's not like there's a rule against that. All of his "training" was pretty much useless for increasing speed
This was the first movie franchise that introduced me to Pixar as a whole. I agree to an extent that some aspects of the trilogy don't make a lot of sense, but I can't bring myself to dislike this franchise. It is just too nostalgic.
Fact: Cars 3 had a deleted flashback scene where Lightning and Doc were having a race when Doc started to collapse and die. It was deleted because it was too sad. Edit: Thx for the likes 💚
*Cars 4* A brilliant inventor creates a new transportation method: The Human. The Human is a giant nude person that crawls across the ground quickly. Hundreds of cars can enter a human through the mouth and are stored throughout it's body. It uses its massive size and ability to climb around and over obstacles to become the new hot transport method. Thousands of humans are constructed. They crawl across the world. There is no plot. It is just absolutely fucking horrifying. *Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.* Edit: *ć̶̫̓ ̵͇̫͒a̷̟̎͝ ̶̡̡͌r̶̛̥̅ ̵̩͔͘s̴̺̩͛̂*
This is beyond words. I have no way to express the feeling, which is somewhere between happiness and a slow painful death. This is the most underrated comment of the 21st century.
While watching this video I thought: "if the locations and story gotta revolve a logical point of the plot and be relate to them (toys, dragon-human, etc), why does kung fu panda works then? Theyre animals, living in a human society, doing human-only things. But the realization came, kung fu panda isnt about them being animals, is about them being KUNG FU FIGHTERS first and then being animals. As we see in the trilogy, the animal part of them is used just in po, with the extinction of the pandas, as a plot point. All the other characters' animal parts are only there to enchance their human attributes, the fierce lady is a tiger, the jokester is a monkey, the old and wise master is a turtle. Kung fu panda works cause it revolves around the Kung fu part instead of the panda part, allowing scenes, scenaries and stories that are related to kung fu warriors and heroism.
All the furious five are based off of kung fu styles. Specifically the Tiger Style the Mantis style the Monkey style the Crane Style and the Viber style.
Cars 2 does genuinely have a reason for the characters to be cars. It's so upsetting. The idea of a gas being used as a secret explosive could only exist as such a big threat IN cars
"How did doc Hudson die?" Either rust or some sort of engine failure and an inability to find parts (like in planes 2) since the Hudson company hasn't existed since like the 50s or 60s
Planes 1 was not a good movie, but at least it wasn't terrible. However, it was forgotten. Planes 2...well, it was pretty bad. And yes, I watched both of these movies.
Regardless if cars doesn’t make any sense, and that they didn’t need to be Anthro car, but I still loved it and I prefer the cars over humans driving cars. I think it’s unique and artistic
That’s an ignorant point he made, it’s an animation and when it comes to designing characters, you should be as creative as you can! Cars was a huge success too, imagine if every cartoon and cgi movie was 100% realistic, it’d be boring. If it has entertaining characters and a plot worth watching (which is subjective to a point) then it’s good enough.
@@MrEggBoi I absolutely love Cars and Cars 3, Cars 2 was alright but it didn’t really fit in with the rest, personally I think it should’ve been a spin off movie or something else. I really enjoyed the animation quality in 3 though it’s amazing how the technology has improved, Idc how old I am Cars is one of my childhood favourites so I’ll always love those movies. ❤️
Planes would have worked so much better as a Video Brinquedo ripoff, and I truly mean that. The story was just so abysmal that I still have trouble recognizing it as actual Disney media.
But in Cars 3 it was shown that Lightning was getting older not because of him looking different, but the racers around him being newer model cars. You can still keep older cars in top shape while them also being outdated.
Film Reviewer's: WTF IS CARS!?!? Kid's from 2006 and Under who are now in love with cars: You dare roast thy giver of a hobby!? For those of you who don't get it, when I was a kid, this movie is was got me in love with racing and cars.
I like how he doesn't get cars getting old,I'm a young car lover and i know that over time cars lose horsepower,becomes less aerodynamic,and the product of the future will become faster overall
I think the idea of dinosaurs becoming the dominant sapient species on Earth is an interesting concept, It's a shame Pixar didn't go further with the idea. They essentially just made another, "Boy and his Dog" film
Was searching for this but now I regret it, cause I do not know, whether the Cars Version of Batman should be Batcar or Batmobile and whether that version has its own Batmobile.
In the first movie, the story is told from the perspective of a racing car as an allegory to people in big cities "racing their lives" instead of slowing down, and taking the time to enjoy a longer, more curvy road just for the scenery. that's how the story benefits from being told via sentient cars
I think the "how can you tell hes aged?!?!" thing is really stupid Im sorry. The entire plot of the movie is that hes become surrounded by newer and faster cars that *look* sleeker and newer and faster. Its very clear that hes an older model by this point. Its less about how hes "aged" and about how hes outdated compared to his peers
@@sydssolanumsamsys Well to be fair, as a drivetrain of a car ages, while subtle; Loss of power starts to become an ever increasing problem exponentially getting worse with age. Aside from a worn engine and transmission, we can assume his suspension is showing wear and tear (bones lmao) as he isn’t quiet as agile and he was previously. So while the age thing isn’t apparent it’s showing signs.
Cars 1: racing Cars 2: an intense spe-thriller about bringing money into the oil and gas industry through ruining the electric side of racing Cars 3: racing
Another thing about toy story is that they even have a reason to have a personality because what do you do with toys as a kid? You give them their own personalities
I will say cars can have their own personalities. Mine most certainly does. She can be a real brat, acts up alot, prefers to sit than be driven unless its been a few days and she needs a blowout, and i have to make deals with her to do things so she gets me where i need to go (usually getting me back home)
"Why are they cars?" Little kids like toy cars. Oh look a movie where your cars have personalities. Now the little kid can connect more with their favorite toy cars! Just my theory.
Same reason toy story is about toys. To sell toys. Inside Out was good but I doubt it cracked the number of toy sales Cars did. I don't think I've ever met a kid who loved it and wanted to be an emotion when they grew up, but you know how many kids love Cars? You're just shitting on something you don't really get that was never really for you to get in the first place.
@@crowthewicked8344 Well, in Planes, there's a character that's literally a flying car, and he says that he's "one of six flying cars ever BUILT." Therefore, the cars are built. Edit: OMG, thanks for all the likes.
@@Kerbydragon but then there's this weird line from the forklift truck lady, who's talking about two twin planes: "I heard they used to be one plane and were separated at BIRTH." DISNEY EXPLAIN
if you believe the pixar theory then i know a good video by a youtube channel called supercarlinbrothers in the video they made a theory where the cars kind of wake up relative to when the humans got them. video they explain this:ua-cam.com/video/dEfULfbCZms/v-deo.html
IMO, the first movie Cars movie is an unironic masterpiece! Shit on the sequels, spin-offs, and TV shows all you want, but the first movie is just a really warm, cozy, nostalgic movie about an asshole having a turnaround! 🏎🏆🏁
7:52 what they mean by old age is not that they biologically get older and lacking energy, but getting older in comparison to the other cars which are more advanced and optimized. McQueen is just as fast as he's always been, it's just that everyone else is now faster. Think of ut this way, the person who held the 100m dash record in 1920 by default was very fast, but it was only fast in comparison to other racers in that time period. As time goes on, things like a rubberized track are created, techniques like starting off with feet on blocks were discovered, and health and diet is generally improved, making it easier for everyone to be faster and thus making it easier and easier and eventually inevitable for someone to break it.
I'm pretty sure, in Cars 3, they explained that old age was related to being outdated. Newer cars had more efficient engines, streamlined designs, etc. All his opponents were more advanced. There is only so much you can do to improve an old car without making it a whole new car by replacing all its parts. McQueen had to retire because he couldn't keep up with automotive innovation. I'm pretty sure Doc's death can just be excused as a dead car. One that just doesn't turn on or work anymore.
Cars 1: never forget your small town roots, always try to appreciate the little things in life Cars 2: you shouldn't push away your friends just because they're annoying (maybe? Idk it's a bit hard to find one for 2) Cars 3: someday, you won't have quite the same pep in your step that you used to, but when that day comes, you can always be a beacon of knowledge for the next generation
I can understand that Cars 2 was a terrible sequel and it dishonoured the franchise, but when I was a kid it was super engaging for me and it had a somewhat plot. I feel like Cars 2 is a movie that can pretty much only be enjoyed by kids and adults will always find its flaws. But also, Cars 2 was one of the first PIXAR movies I had ever watched, and to date I associate this movie with PIXAR. I have too many memories with this movie to actually start hating it. I don’t really understand the guff it gets. So honestly, I appreciate Cars 2 more than Cars 3 because of nostalgia.
@@fogernelion1949 I suspect the OP's point was that the video says that Toy Story is conceptually sound "because toys are alive" and Cars is not conceptually sound because "cars aren't alive in real life" and this is a flawed argument as you already have noted.
The longer I watched, the more sure I was that this video HAD to be ironic, I even went and checked if it was uploaded on April 1st. There's another comment that explains this way better than I ever could, but Schaff seems to have completely missed the point of Cars, being a love letter to NASCAR, and US car culture, which is so unusual for him. Also, imo it's silly to judge this movie harshly for not following the same formula as all the other ones, almost as silly as a movie about talking cars 😉
They always show these cars living in complex environments yet I still don't understand how the hell they can even do basic tasks like picking up a brick.
Did anyone ever wonder how weird Piston Cup is? Like, imagine if there was a running competition called Quadriceps Cup, and the winner would get a trophy shaped like a quadiceps? (it's the big muscle on the frontside of your thigh that does most of the work when running)
I just want to say the only thing about Toy Story 4 that upset me a bit was that Bonnie previously promised Andy she'd look after them, but she tossed Woody aside later 😭 I know she's a kid and that's what they do, but damn, still hurt me
there's so much wrong with toy story 4 but like as a big fan of toy story that weirdly felt like such a betrayel, because of how contrived it is. I want to also say "I know she's just a kid" but it's so clearly a made up aspect just to prompt the 4th movie (which is just a cash grab) that it detracts from the quality of the toy story 3 ending which is the worst sin imaginable.
@@mr.preston1632 there's so many things I was just listing my main reason. it is a shame because the animation is fucking gorgeous and it makes me sad that so much work went into a movie with an ill conceived story.
And, it makes sense that Woody realises it's pointless to try to make Bonnie happy. She promised she'd look after him, and then lost interest in him. It becomes obvious his purpose of being a toy left with Andy, and that he'd have to forever fight to get that same kind of attention from Bonnie. I'm honestly glad Toy Story 4 was made, even if so many people were against it. It shows that it's okay to not fulfil the function you were "built" for. Woody found a new life he never thought possible. It's inspiring.
Schaff talking about how the cars being cars serves no purpose made me realize how solid the concept of Thomas and Friends is. The original concept was literally "If an engine had a face, what would it say?" The first few seasons of the show use this concept wonderfully by keeping everything grounded in reality. The stories revolve around things like engines forgetting to pull certain trains, engines refusing to pull freight trains and getting in trouble as a result, certain railways shutting down, etc.
@@alex.g7317 It’s fairly easy to make a show about anthropomorphic animals without thinking too much about how everything else works. The same can't be said for vehicles.
Are you talking about when they turned that car at the start into a visible metal cube for all the children to see, or are you talking about when they made that muscle car speed that fast that he blew up, I'm sure that in Care 2 there's more counts of murder which I've not noted.
if the cars franchise has a million fans, I am one of them. If the cars franchise has 10 fans I am one of them. If the cars franchise has one fan, that one is me. If the cars franchise has zero fans, then I am dead.
I think that the original Cars movie wasn't about taking a premise like "what if cars were alive" and running with it. It was a love letter to the old highway system and old Route 66, en era of American culture that was uniquely American, and that ended far too quickly.
Exactly! I feel like so many people miss this key idea about the first Cars movie. I loved the original cars as a kid, and so did my parents. Because they loved the homage it was paying to that old, classic American highway culture and the attention it called to those old towns that flourished from it but soon deteriorated once it left our society.
One thing above all else is it was designed to appeal to NASCAR fans. It’s literally a NASCAR movie where the main aspect of a NASCAR race, the cars, are the main characters. The human aspect is removed entirely.
In the scene where Lightning McQueen is being held in court, there is a painting that depicts a line of cars strolling out of a factory after being created, which (evidently) confirms that the cars species is manufactured. It's interesting because, for all of the questions that fans have held about the universe over the years, no one seems to bring up this detail.
So do the factory owners just own the rights to BIRTH ITSELF? Or more disturbingly, is it just one factory that builds cars on its own? Like, it doesn't have a face like the cars and planes and boats, it just _does,_ and will for all eternity. If there are multiple factories, does that make the painting equivalent to a painting of a woman giving birth? If my scp-esque factory theory is true, does that make it a painting of *_GOD?_*
@@KyrieFortuneMaybe it could be a visual interpretation of the creation of life, with the factory representing God, like Michelangelo's The Creation of Adam. Huh, interpreting the painting figuratively gives us an explanation for the painting, but taking the painting literally lets us theorize explanations for the car species', and disturbing ones at that! And disturbing theories are FUN!
The painting on the left shows a car version of Justitia, the Roman godess of justice, which implies a car equivalent of the Roman empire and its mythology
As an astronomy Nerd, we do not know what object killed the dinosaurs. Both asteroids and comets can impact Earth, and they have roughly the same effect. If the impactor had water, and some of that water had been captured in cristals, like zircon cristal, and some of those cristals had survived the impact, we could collect them and analyse the deuterium concentration of the water. As the deuterium concentration is different in asteroids and comets, we could then know what impacted the Earth. But that's a really big "If" and I don't think such a study was ever attempted. Oh god I'm giving this way too much thought.
Yeah, the plot revolved around the world becoming more advanced and leaving him behind, not that he himself was aging. Just how Doc was an older car and that communicated his "age" or whatever. I'm not that invested in the Cars universe but that was s u p e r obvious.
Props for making the comment before I needed to. Machines get old and outdated, and eventually break. I guess I was wrong for assuming that was common knowledge. I agree with the video that you can't really tell at a glance Lightning is "older" in the 3rd movie, but that's because you're supposed to infer that from the story's context. Like all the times they call him old, and all the times he worries about not keeping up with newer competitors. Which is the whole movie.
Why couldn’t lightning get a new engine or better tires or something? Cars can get better parts for themselves and there are plenty of ways to improve an old car.
@@pjdixon6199 The problem is that brings into effect the Ship of Theseus theory. If a car keeps getting its parts replaced and eventually gets all its parts replaced, is it still the same sentient being, or is it a totally new one? Did Doc get all his parts replaced and become a totally new person? What if someone managed to bring together most of his old body parts and rebuild him; would that be Doc? And if it is considered to be Doc and/or has Doc's sentience, would it be considered a medical procedure or straight-up necromancy?
@@DetectiveNyx They explored that a bit in Planes 2. I'm sure they could've pushed the concept a little further in Cars 3 as well (heck, maybe even Cars 2, and there's even a deleted scene from Cars 1 exploring that a bit too), but they didn't take as many risks as Planes in that regard. Which is quite surprising to me.
When Schaffrillas Productions makes a review on Shrek Forever After, would it be "Why Shrek Forever After is an Underrated Masterpiece" or "Why Shrek Forever After is Flawed Yet Underrated".
When Cars 2 came out I thought each installment in the franchise was going to be based on a different type/genre of movie. 1st movie was racing/slowing down, 2nd movie was spies, maybe the 3rd movie would be full blown romcom. I thought it would have been funny and interesting to see each movie be a different genre but with the same characters.
I’m just disappointed that, in all three movies, we never saw a car wipe it’s tears with its windshield wipers.
I saw that on Ted 2
Yeah but where would they come from? Window sprayers? Hmmmm... "I'm not crying, I'm just washing my windows!"
The level of genius displayed here is unprecedented
@Ruby Taylor that quote would actually work really well if they were to do that though...
@@kittvskarrkr6074oh my god??$?$?$??
The good dinosaur should've gotten the wall e treatment, little to no dialogue, just a human boy and a young dinosaur finding out they aren't that different
That would have made it way better!
That's honestly what I thought the film was going to be
*The Good Dinosaur (actual version) score*
Animation: 6 (while the backgrounds are not my absolute favourites, they still got the job done to be the closest thing to making TGD feel like a Pixar film with the power of modern CGI to make it look believable. If only the character designs, even if they were stylized which is fitting for a Pixar film, matched the photorealism of the film’s atmosphere)
Story: 3 (to give it credit where credit is due, at least Arlo and Spot shared a touching bond... which could’ve been more if the movie were less disappointing)
Characters: 4 (the only ones I really did like were the tyrannosauruses, but if only they had more screen time)
*5/10 (it’s not the worst Pixar film, but it’s close)*
Oooh that would've been better. I don't hate it as much as other people do but still
The scene where Spot explains what happened to his family and Arlo responds in kind about his father, all with little dialogue, was a tiny glimpse into what could've been
In 10 years people will be talking about how horrifying the live action remake of cars looked.
I'll be Prepared
oh no
ua-cam.com/video/PHCFDJdWJpw/v-deo.html
Gagemcninja 🚗🚙🚐🚚🛴🛺🚖🚜🚑🚒🚓🚛🚜🛵🏍🚘🚎🚌🚙🚕🚔🚘🚍👁👄👁
go ahead and r/whooosh me
Cars is already sorta "live action". Animation is realistic and there's no real living animals, soooooo
3:00
I'm sorry, but, this is objectively false. A vast majority of environments and stories being told in the Cars universe relates to both American and Automotive history, especially in regards to things like NASCAR, as American Automotives are a very rich culture that has a long history behind it. Radiator Springs for example is directly inspired by actual dying cities and routes from Route 66, the Piston Cup is a parallel to Grand Prix trophies, a large amount of cars are even voiced by racing or driving legends, and more. Obviously you could tell these stories with humans driving cars, but why not make it with sentient cars? That's just a lot funner and creative as it's very interesting to bring to life the various personalities of automobiles, like how Sally is a Porsche, despite originally being planned on being a Mustang, due to the fact that Porsches are a lot more feminine. Even little things like making tractors cattle is really interesting and creative. There isn't a point to overthinking it.
by that, I mean, Car lovers tend to imprint personalities onto their vehicles, based on their condition, age, etc., in the same way that a child would imprint personalities onto their toys, so it makes sense to a certain degree as to why they would tell very human stories with anthromorphic cars; it's basically a romanticized story of what would happen if a car lover's cars actually were sentient, and the personalities we imprinted onto them became their actual living personalities. A way you could look at it is that it's effectively a human story of the driver's ambitions, told from the perspective of their cars. They obviously don't have to literally BE Cars, but if you think the franchise is bad for that reason, then you are missing the point of it, and the creativity factor of the franchise would be exceptionally dull if it wasn't using anthromorphic cars.
Ironically, your mentality of "them being sentient cars has to actually be relevant to the plot" is something that lead to Cars 2, which is easily the worst movie in the franchise by a very large margin, by making various plot points explicitly depend on them being Cars. Even you attest to this.
In Cars 3, keeping what I said in mind about it being a theoretical driver's ambitions told from the perspective of the Cars themselves, Lightning McQueen is getting old because he's an old NASCAR model. He isn't literally an old man; he is, instead, an outdated model being replaced by far more advanced technology than him. This is exactly what happened to Doc previously. This plot point is very clearly presented, I'm genuinely not sure why you missed that.
Doc died because, in reality, even Cars stop working after a while. Doc was a 70 year old Hudson Hornet. There is only 19 Hudson Hornets left in real life due to the reality of automotives aging and deteriorating, and those 19 Hudson Hornets are requiring constant heavy maintenance to stay running. It really isn't a stretch to assume Doc simply succumbed to age and lack of maintenance considering they chose to live in the Desert for their last couple of decades.
I think the real shortcoming is that there is far fewer passionate car lovers than toy lovers and such, especially with young people. These movies were made for car lovers who are passionate about cars and want to see their beloved hobby and inanimate objects they care about be brought to life. But, because of this, it kinda failed to find it's target audience since it was a Pixar film marketed towards kids. Cars 2 tried to address those two issues by both being explicitly made for kids and also directly tying the fact that they are cars into the plot, which sounded good on paper, but it ultimately fell completely flat by alienating it's existing fanbase, and Cars 3 was made to properly provide a send-off to the people who "got" it and really latched onto the movies. Even the characters themselves are testaments to Automotive History and every car brand was very deliberately picked, because every car in the movie needed to have a very rich and deep history behind it.
I personally have a passionate fondness for vehicles. So Cars really stood out to me as an incredibly creative idea that brought beloved vehicles to life and showcased their history and what kind of personalities they would have if their drivers had their personalities imprinted into them. Of course it leads to all the funny hypothetical questions like "Where did all the humans go", "Why are these cities made for cars", etc., but if you ask that question seriously, and criticize the film for it, then you have missed the point of why it's the way that it is, y'know?
Dude… Thank you. 🙏
You absolute fucking legend. I couldn't have put it better if I had an entire year to write it lol
Great analysis! I usually really like Schaff but this video was a massive L on him
Thank you for saying what all of us feel. Glad I wasn’t the only one who thought this video was off
A+ comment
This video isn’t called “Give us the Shrek 4 Review” as we discussed
We’ve been tricked, backstabbed and quite possibly *bamboozeled*
*THAT WAS HIS MISTAKE*
I feel betrayed
Us*
We hack the cars and riot at dawn
"Cars don't die of old age"
Have you ever had a car?
Theoretically, if someone were to stubbornly keep making replacement parts, a car could last forever. How many parts were left original, of course, would be in question
Appletank8 yeah but at that point it's the ship if Theseus. Or, car...
@@Appletank8 Well, theoretically, if you continued to replace humans with new organs, they could continue to live. Rich people are buying blood from young people. People recieve heart, kidney, blood marrow transplants. Still, people die of old age/heart disease/heart attacks/kidney failure/etc.
RoninHD that’s because unlike human organs car parts can theoretically be mass produced. Just dig up some Materials and boom, car parts. Also unlike human flesh metal decays slowly and can be taken out of the fixed and put back in. So yeah they at least would have a longer life span than a humans. If we believe that car WW|| happened around human WW|| than Sarge was only be 77 which is way to soon. In this essay I will
@@theteethburglar4716 Okay, but think about this. If you are constantly replacing the parts of a car, and you eventually replace every part of the car, is it the same car?
When there's no "That was his mistake" joke in the video
*THAT MISTAKE WAS HIS*
HIS MISTAKE WAS THAT
*_M I S T A K E H I S T H A T W A S_*
*WAS HIS MISTAKE THAT*
I thought he would say it after saying “it’s not the worst movie ever “
MISTAKE THAT HIS WAS
The concept of a demolition derby in a world of sentient cars feels like an underground bloodsport
The first rule of Fast Club
I know, but what's even worse, in the series Cars on the Road they have a monster truck. Do we even need to imagine how messed up that would be if we had an equivalent of a monster truck event in our world? (Well, okay, we do have an equivalent in our world, and it's called... a monster truck event, but you know what I mean. If we had a more exact 1-to-1 representation of what a monster truck event would be like in the Cars universe. Trucks roaring through a morgue, limbs and guts... Never mind.)
@@matthewmitchell3457 I suppose the human equivalent would be some fucked up Olympics where all enhancing/doping drugs and even body modifications are allowed and encouraged
Demolition derbies and monster truck events are the Cars universe equivalent of what happened in Roman Colosseums in our world.
@@matthewmitchell3457 Monster trucks aren’t new, they’ve been in the movies since the first one
I think this entire franchise was built upon the idea of "hey the front grill of a lot of cars kind of look like faces"
I think this quite often actually lol they either look like they're smiling or really pissed off
Fun fact : Cars are actually designed that way for some reason. I think the guy making the concept of how a car would look was smokin' something.
Arent the headlights supposed to be eyes
@@arutezza yeah but that would be too weird looking for a kids movie
@@trisle2764 i mean pop up headlights already look a lot like eyes
In McQueen's defence, he was becoming outdated, and thus, getting old. The film plot already says that he can't keep up with the other racers who are fresher, more updated and better performing.
That's why the argument of cars dying doesn't make sense. In the real world cars get older, slower and eventually break down
How are these cars born? Or made? I love cars but cars leavs you with more questions than anything else and it shouldn't even be that deep of a movie. XD
@@HadHadHad-A I think something like Robots? Where parents order a baby from an autoshop, adopt, then as they grow older they get upgrades and new parts.
@@crowthewicked8344 because “making the baby is the fun part” is an underrated line in animated movie history. And yeah that’s always how I assumed car babies are made
@@jacklyynch I don't think it neeeds an explanation, it's a concept that made my childhood, but making it realistic would kill it completly.
They should have called Cars 2 "Mater: A Car's Story" and Cars 3 "Cars 2"
Cars 2 could be a good spin off.
Mater: A car wars story
Iokepa Gyarados cars 3 was actually kind of decent though
Or how about "Cars 2: Mater's Big Adventure"!! XD
Cars 2 is a good spy movie, just a bad movie movie.
Cars 1 could be argued as having a car theme. 2 was just a thrill for kids with little to no plot. 3 was missed opportunities and pain
to be fair 3 was in a rough spot after 2 so it actually would have been a miracle if the story was impactful in the first place
Exactly, Cars' concept isn't necessarily about cars, it's about a race driver learning to overcome his ego. Automobiles is a theming that simplifies the movie's concept and makes it more distinct.
The second film was weird because it was trying to make a spy movie around the theme of cars.
Elaborate on the third point. I don't agree and I wanna hear how you think it's missed opportunity.
@@5usp3c7 a lot of the deleted scenes are a good start, they help flesh out Cruz and change the ending in a unique way.
Cars 1 was a masterpiece, the others were complete garbage
8:34
"It doesn't have any quotable meme phrases!"
the movie: "Am I a speed to you?"
And don't forget, "He did what in his cup."
kachow
Get outta here you bronie I don't want cancer today
@@peoplewhoroleplayincomment4000 You dropped this. *hands clown license*
@@edwardboland8957 I'm not joking Mr. *Edward*
Remember, life is a highway. And can result in a horrible crash.
Nice
I'm putting that on a tshirt
According to transitive property, Tim McGraw's emotional rocker "Highway Don't Care" is a warning that life itself does not care about you. But he does, he does.
Relatable
And you are the accident that happened on it
I want a Cars prequel, where we see cars become sentient and slowly kill off all humans and take over the world.
Detroit: become human, but cars
Rise of the planet of the cars
Yes
That would be rated pg-13 or rated R
LMFAO
I like how Schaff is just detailing why the Cars franchise is nonsensical and pointless and everyone’s just like, “Well… I liked it!”
I dont 🗿
i did enjoy the first movie (never watched the other two) when i was younger but i acknowldege the franchises is not that good
no one who enjoys the cars franchise thinks the worldbuilding is great lol, believe it or not, but people can enjoy a story without thinking too much of the complex world around it
Exactly people not using reason and using nostalgia just like fans of disney’s dinosaur
@@tomascoelho5562 but cars 3 asks us to think about stuff like how is lighting mcqueen old which requires knowledge of motorsports which most kids don’t care about
That NordVPN plug was smooth
Just like the street that Lightning McQueen paved in Cars 1 🚘
Macro why you so cool
Macro why you watching this vid.
Ya noob
And they said infinity war was the greatest crossover
Lmao
Wow.Guess my and Macro's taste are similiar.
"How do cars die"
Hutson went to many miles without an oil change and McQueen is going on 200,000 miles
For what it's worth, most cars "die" when they have parts breakages that'd be too expensive to repair, and get abandoned/ crushed. Not exactly a concept that'd work for the cars universe without a bit of existential horror
@@farmerboy916 Well, that does sound a lot like how privatized healthcare works, such as that of the US.
EGBrandan Ironically, that is one of the few ways you could make them being cars actually interesting and relevant.
I like the mileage idea for universe aging. Could also make a certain part, like their engine, their "soul" which cannot be replaced; kind of like a human can't replace their brain.
@@farmerboy916 Funny enough, There is actually concept art for dead cars and a rough draft of a scene to go with it. It's been a long time since I've seen it but I remember it being really unsettling.
“Cars aren’t alive in real life.”
Boy, do I have a revelation about toys for you.
WHAT?!
What do you mean?
So all my hot-glueing was for nothing!?
You can't prove that.
Lol, good joke...
The thing about these movies is very clearly the writers didn't expect anyone older than ten to take a deeper look at them. Because if they did, they would have needed to consider that the locations all being 1:1 to real locations suggests that history is relatively unchanged. Meaning that there very well could have been a car Holocaust, a car Cold War, and a car 9/11.
How come other pixar films were written intelligently
I shit you not, in the spinoff movie Planes, there's literally a character who's a World War II veteran. They even show a flashback of him being a soldier during WWII.
So yeah, Car Hitler probably existed. Now I wonder what type of Car he was.
@@sukriti7213probably a Volkswagen
@@sukriti7213 Probaly a Volkswagen or Mercedes
The existence of the pope mobile implies that Catholicism exists in the Cars universe, which implies that there was a car Jesus who died on the cross for our vehicular sins.
In the Cars movies, the characters can be arrested for speeding. And since they are LIVING cars, it would be the same thing as getting arrested for running too fast.
Usain bolt would have the death sentence by now
In real life, it would he an amazing feat to kill someone by running into them. Not as hard for living cars.
Vulcan
THANK YOU I WANT TO KISS YOU NOW!
Something something sonic joke
Arrested for speeding? when? in which movie? I watched all 3 movies *several* times and i NEVER seen that
Meanings behind the Cars movies:
Cars 1: Slow down. Enjoy the simple things in life.
Cars 2: *absolutely nothing*
Cars 3: Accept to be yourself and acknowledge times are changing
I always thought Cars 2 was saying we all have our uses. Mater figured out the real villain when most people, even McQueen, thought he was a dumb hick.
Cars 2:I LOVE KILLING I LOVE MUDER!
Warband Seven İnsan yea its haha i am spy i kill people
Cars 2 : COCAINE IS EXTREMELY FUN !!!!
Cars 2: Anyone can be a hero, no matter who you are
Schaffrillas: "why cars is a conceptually bad franchise"
My inner 6 year old self: how dare you?
I relate to this so much
Although lightning can be a savage unrest or character , throw francise is nostalgic. I like his savage personality
Same dude
Cars is not bad you liers 😡😡😡
Olive Oil I remember watching shark tales I had the dvd. Personally didn’t like it. Though it was a part of my childhood and I know it’s nostalgic to people
The unlucky tug actually brought up some good points in his big retrospective of these movies, like how cars 3 gives an actual purpose to them being cars, and how cars 2 is the reason why the world is confusing. It’s a good watch, I recommend it. I’m not saying it’ll change your mind about these movies, but it does answer some questions about these movies.
Yes yes excellent counter argument, both sides have great points but I do think Tug made a MUCH better discussion on Cars as a franchise
I agree Especially Since He Actually Brings A Point For Cars 1 He Said It's Much More Creative With Cars Then Humans
@@finaliestexactly. The whole point of the animation medium is to be more creative, more quirky, more abstract, etc. If you make every character a generic human being, that completely defeats the purpose, and you may as well have made it live action. It would've genuinely made the story more boring
@@Nic_2751 Agreed
@@pirate_cove_manI rlly like mr crab man schaff most of the time but this is easily his worst video ever. It gets so much wrong and this is probably the main video that tarnishes the whole franchise cause of how much insane terrible shit cars 2 did (dispite every thing with McQueen and the music being amazing)
Cars 1: good film
Fans: what happens now
Disney: jAmEs BoNd
Ok Warden
Cars 1: mediorce film.
Gabriel 2020 because cars just isn’t as good as the other Pixar films. The storyline is generic, the characters are pretty forgettable, and the soundtrack is meh. It isn’t a bad movie at all but it can’t possibly compare to movies like toy story, the incredibles, ratatouille, wall-E, Up, and even monsters inc
Glctc Thnkr Yeah. I explained basically the same but a YT robot deleted my comment.
@@glctcthnkr8059 Minecraft: Lost Hero is better than this movies. But Cars 1 is great
No no no, this was supposed to be called "Give us the Shrek 4 review"
I feel scammed.
I feel catfished
I feel abandoned
Unsubscribed
I’m embarrassed, I don’t trust no one around us-
When Schaff doesn't actually name the video "Give us the Shrek 4 review" 😡
U N S U B S C R I B E D (jk)
When you steal the top comment
Shaft?
Give us Cars 2 review
how do car have sex thank
I watched the Cars franchise last month and it was far better than I expected it to be. You say that there’s no emotional moments but when he’s starts “fading fast” in Cars 3, it was a feeling of sadness that all sports fans have felt. Last year I watched Cristiano Ronaldo, a soccer icon for 20 years, play for Manchester United and he was so bad it was genuinely uncomfortable to watch. There’s nothing worse than that as a sports fan and that Cars 3 scene demonstrated it perfectly. That scene is used constantly on twitter too whenever a player has gotten too old.
Let's not forget doc Hudson's origin as a whole and radiator springs and how it died off. Lightning giving up the win so he could help strip weathers finish his last race was wholesome as hell
Honestly, the way I’ve always thought about it is that cars are appealing to kids. If Cars was made with humans, I think kids would be less interested, and this is important for more reasons than just money. I learned a lot from this movie as a kid about pride, not judging others, and living your life for more than just personal gain. If it was humans, I would have gotten bored and not cared when I was younger. So while being cars is far from integral to the plot, and this movie is far from like a masterpiece, that always counted for something to me
D
respect
I can confirm this theory because i can say that i was the biggest cars fan you could ever hear about when i was young
that is correct sir
well said
intellectuals: explaining what makes Cars work and not work
me: haha red car go vroom vroom
Lol
Exactly this guy doesn't get it
@@sheko1515 He's got alot more points then just that it's universe dosen't make sense and though I love Cars he's got a point
Plus it's his opinion, trust me he knows what "unironic enjoyment" is
@@Yougotcaged102 There joking tho.
@@Yougotcaged102 chiilll duude it's called sarcasm
"Cars 3 was the good one, right?"
Gets ad about pain killers.
How appropriate
Nice
I got the ip vanish ad instead
@@eazyone83 same
Sonya Brennan I got an ad about drink driving......
I got an ad about hot pepperoni pizza from dominos
For those unaware he was in a car accident this morning. Two of his buddies died and James is in crit
Apparently James has woken up and is no longer in critical condition, but his brother and his friend didn't make it...
This is really sad and I hope the James can get better
@@BenJPics9925 wdym?
Wait for real? Bruh.
“How do cars age and die?”
Are you serious? Have you never actually heard of a car before this?
This.
They age by humans using them. They don't age by themselves.
@@rommix0 they… They drive around on their own. Parts break down. Metal rusts
@@rommix0 These cars are literally using themselves. Of course its gonna be worn down. Even a stone on mountain will still break down.
@@rommix0 Cars age faster when they're not used. Just the same way that a person who sits and does nothing will grow fat and their body decays. A car that sits without being driven experiences more rust and corrosion, gets eaten by miss and bugs and rodents, rubber parts decay, fluids separate and deteriorate, etc. Cars suffer from neglect more than all but the most outrageous abuse. Not unlike a child.
What they meant by McQueen "getting old" in the third one, in my opinion, is that the world of racing had evolved and it was all about high-tech, as shown by the antagonist and the training sequences, so he was obsolete.
I like Movie Concepts.
I mean cars do get old in our world. You don't keep a car for very long, they wear out. Lighting is supposed to be an athlete and usually athletes retire at their late thirties so it makes sense.
He'd be...
_Worthleeeess_
Also think to the olympics. The older veteran who's still at the top of their game, but still can't compete with the new crowd, because the newer competitors get stronger and crazier every year
Buuuuuuut why didn't McQueen ever try to like change his engine or something, it's not like there's a rule against that. All of his "training" was pretty much useless for increasing speed
In the Cars universe, "NordVPN" would be called "FordVPN."
Justin Hill whhyyy
Surprisingly they haven't made that a joke for now until they make a 4th one of course
@@brgan557 am i the only one who has a memory of watching cars 3 way before 2017 and was surprised cars 3 was cars 4 when it came out.
Jesus Chrysler.
Imagine viking cars
This was the first movie franchise that introduced me to Pixar as a whole. I agree to an extent that some aspects of the trilogy don't make a lot of sense, but I can't bring myself to dislike this franchise. It is just too nostalgic.
Fact: Cars 3 had a deleted flashback scene where Lightning and Doc were having a race when Doc started to collapse and die. It was deleted because it was too sad.
Edit: Thx for the likes 💚
pretty ironic coming from the company who has made several sad films in their past
They are COWARDS for deleting that >:0
*Minion whaaaa meme* 🍌
That doesn’t even make sense.
Despite the fact that literally their next film is about dead guys.
*Cars 4*
A brilliant inventor creates a new transportation method: The Human. The Human is a giant nude person that crawls across the ground quickly. Hundreds of cars can enter a human through the mouth and are stored throughout it's body. It uses its massive size and ability to climb around and over obstacles to become the new hot transport method. Thousands of humans are constructed. They crawl across the world. There is no plot. It is just absolutely fucking horrifying.
*Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.*
Edit: *ć̶̫̓ ̵͇̫͒a̷̟̎͝ ̶̡̡͌r̶̛̥̅ ̵̩͔͘s̴̺̩͛̂*
This is beyond words. I have no way to express the feeling, which is somewhere between happiness and a slow painful death. This is the most underrated comment of the 21st century.
Oh my god
You monster
......................... I have no comment on this.........
teacup salamander I need this
While watching this video I thought: "if the locations and story gotta revolve a logical point of the plot and be relate to them (toys, dragon-human, etc), why does kung fu panda works then? Theyre animals, living in a human society, doing human-only things. But the realization came, kung fu panda isnt about them being animals, is about them being KUNG FU FIGHTERS first and then being animals. As we see in the trilogy, the animal part of them is used just in po, with the extinction of the pandas, as a plot point. All the other characters' animal parts are only there to enchance their human attributes, the fierce lady is a tiger, the jokester is a monkey, the old and wise master is a turtle.
Kung fu panda works cause it revolves around the Kung fu part instead of the panda part, allowing scenes, scenaries and stories that are related to kung fu warriors and heroism.
I'd imagine someone's defense will be like "its Dreamworks, we can give them a pass on logic since its not Disney/Pixar."
YES! BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ANTHROPOMORPHISM!!
All the furious five are based off of kung fu styles.
Specifically the Tiger Style the Mantis style the Monkey style the Crane Style and the Viber style.
@@athan13590 *v i b e r s t y l e*
Also, in real life snow leopards (Tai lung's species) are predators of giant pandas and red pandas, so that's a nice little detail i'd say
Cars 2 does genuinely have a reason for the characters to be cars. It's so upsetting. The idea of a gas being used as a secret explosive could only exist as such a big threat IN cars
"Toyr R Us- ooh, too soon."
Joke's on you, we still have Toys R Us in Canada.
How!?
@@reaperandgrim According to Wikipedia, the Canadian branch was sold to a third-party who's kept it going.
@@hyperdimensionbliss at least they are not ALL gone
Guess I'm going to Canada
I saw one on my trip to Canada a few weeks ago. It was coooooooooooool
"How did doc Hudson die?"
Either rust or some sort of engine failure and an inability to find parts (like in planes 2) since the Hudson company hasn't existed since like the 50s or 60s
I absolutely LOVE that you are referencing Planes 2 as if that is a movie any of us have had the privilege to know of its existence.
Planes 1 was not a good movie, but at least it wasn't terrible. However, it was forgotten. Planes 2...well, it was pretty bad. And yes, I watched both of these movies.
Hold on is planes 2 a fucking movie
now, get ready for
Trains
Boats is next.
“What comes into mind for cars?”
Me: *N A S C A R-*
Finally, someone who speaks English in this kind of world.
thank you
There’s only one race, the human race. *slaps* WHAT ABOUT NASCAR
*no no,he's got a point*
I N D Y C A R
Regardless if cars doesn’t make any sense, and that they didn’t need to be Anthro car, but I still loved it and I prefer the cars over humans driving cars. I think it’s unique and artistic
EXACTLY
That’s an ignorant point he made, it’s an animation and when it comes to designing characters, you should be as creative as you can!
Cars was a huge success too, imagine if every cartoon and cgi movie was 100% realistic, it’d be boring.
If it has entertaining characters and a plot worth watching (which is subjective to a point) then it’s good enough.
@@hijackedmemes6988 that’s what I was thinking
@@MrEggBoi I absolutely love Cars and Cars 3, Cars 2 was alright but it didn’t really fit in with the rest, personally I think it should’ve been a spin off movie or something else.
I really enjoyed the animation quality in 3 though it’s amazing how the technology has improved, Idc how old I am Cars is one of my childhood favourites so I’ll always love those movies. ❤️
@@hijackedmemes6988 same here, cars was so fun to watch and I honestly still enjoy it
"Talks about Cars"
*DOESN'T MENTION PLANES*
Planes is even worst than cars 2
It's about a plane who has fear of heights
Why we don't make a movie about a boat afraid of water?
Planes would have worked so much better as a Video Brinquedo ripoff, and I truly mean that. The story was just so abysmal that I still have trouble recognizing it as actual Disney media.
I would pay to watch the boat movie tbh.
The less said about Planes, the better.
what about a car afraid of the ground so hes a nervous wreck
His voice said "Ka-chow"
But his heart said"End me now"
My .45 says ka-pow
Oh shit that’s deep
667th like hahaha
Jesus this feels like a slimesicle quote
Garrett Marzo deep, man.
Ok i need to give you props, that sponsorship was probably the most natural and not forced one ive ever seen
ikr, this is so much more enjoyable !
Surprising considering it's NordVPN. That shit is everywhere.
It seems you've missed Alpharad's Dunkin' plug.
@@yakov9903 yes that one was great also
very dom you just haven’t watched any Linus Tech Tips videos that dude’s got a ton of those
2:30 don’t forget their base camp, a literal child’s bedroom, a hive of creativity and imagination
"But Cars 3 is the good one, right?"
*long pause*
*car dealership ad pops up*
Can’t believe you didn’t call it ‘give us the shrek 4 review’
Unsubscribed
He posted Cring.Lirerally Unwatchable.
I,myself are not thrilled.
I agree, he is testing our patience
Damn it you beat me to it
It's sad :(
But in Cars 3 it was shown that Lightning was getting older not because of him looking different, but the racers around him being newer model cars. You can still keep older cars in top shape while them also being outdated.
@Monte
The whole "You can do your best and still not succeed" phrase comes to mind.
@@potmeetkettle That sounds deeply realistic
Yeah but then how did Doc Hudson die?
Julia Robinson car cancer
@@joliecrusoe387 Rust....?
"Why are they cars?"
Because humans are boring and it's fucking cool
"None of the themes are car related"
I guess car racing doesn't exist then
Car races are done by humans 🤦🏾♀️ there’s no reason for them to be cars because a story about car racing could be done with humans, see turbo
Like did you watch the video, he literally says this?
Also by themes he means stuff like a feeling of inadequacy and growing old
@@chrysoz9031 them being cars is objectively more interesting than them being just humans
@@themolasser9110 but why though
Friendly reminder that Car Hitler is canonically an actual thing in the Cars Universe.
Callum Sparrow and don’t forget a Car Kevin Spacey
@@PeruvianPotato I think you mean Carsacks
@@ViceAdmiralHoratioNeIson thx
Wait what how
IMO Car Hitler would be a old vw beetle
Film Reviewer's: WTF IS CARS!?!?
Kid's from 2006 and Under who are now in love with cars: You dare roast thy giver of a hobby!?
For those of you who don't get it, when I was a kid, this movie is was got me in love with racing and cars.
I like how he doesn't get cars getting old,I'm a young car lover and i know that over time cars lose horsepower,becomes less aerodynamic,and the product of the future will become faster overall
Me too
i was born in 2001 and i have no fucking idea what this means.
I know this but he didn't try to grasp the concept from the view of a kid
@@alovingdumbass9191 even as a kid I knew cars was bad, but I get what you mean
Schaffrillas: "Good Dinosaur should've utilized how the Dinosaur world interacts with the human world"
Me: like the Flintstones?
I dont like how he bashed the good dinosaur...its a solid film
Asmosis Jones why? I thought it was so boring and pointless
I think the idea of dinosaurs becoming the dominant sapient species on Earth is an interesting concept, It's a shame Pixar didn't go further with the idea. They essentially just made another, "Boy and his Dog" film
@@razkable a solid boring and pointless film.
Asmosis Jones it would’ve worked better as a western type movie with humans, plot-wise, the concept was neat, but they almost did nothing about it
Cars Franchise be like:
Cars: Racing
Cars 2: *B R U H*
Cars 3: Racing
“We live in a car society”
-Jocar
Am I allowed to delete replies to my comment
Was searching for this but now I regret it, cause I do not know, whether the Cars Version of Batman should be Batcar or Batmobile and whether that version has its own Batmobile.
Good one.
Wanna know how got the scratches
Well Im the jocar baby
I'm the Jocar Baby
"What comes to mind when you think of cars?"
Family.
Dom Torreto is proud
Racing
🎶 Aunque digan que soy🎶
Yeah, I remember that one sibling that was super narcissistic and they accidentally got stuck in an abandoned town😁
...
How to start a conversation with a girl:
-1. Hi there!-
2. *Kachow*
How to be original:
You can’t.
Boom roasted
AH GENERAL KACHOWBI
You mean kerchoo right?
Hello there
GENERAL KER-CHEW
In the first movie, the story is told from the perspective of a racing car as an allegory to people in big cities "racing their lives" instead of slowing down, and taking the time to enjoy a longer, more curvy road just for the scenery. that's how the story benefits from being told via sentient cars
I think the "how can you tell hes aged?!?!" thing is really stupid Im sorry. The entire plot of the movie is that hes become surrounded by newer and faster cars that *look* sleeker and newer and faster. Its very clear that hes an older model by this point. Its less about how hes "aged" and about how hes outdated compared to his peers
+ hes an athlete. Athletes retire very young
and cars age. he doesnt (lmao) but even if they were all similar models he could have been old.
@@sydssolanumsamsys Well to be fair, as a drivetrain of a car ages, while subtle; Loss of power starts to become an ever increasing problem exponentially getting worse with age. Aside from a worn engine and transmission, we can assume his suspension is showing wear and tear (bones lmao) as he isn’t quiet as agile and he was previously. So while the age thing isn’t apparent it’s showing signs.
The movie kinda explains it by showing the improvements like Jackson storm
@@gustavrodriguez910 yes ty for the breakdown
People want Shrek 4,
But I want something else
Shrek the Musical. Yes it's real
:Dillon Wingull it exists
Nah man, I wanna see him tackle the Spider-Man musical
I want him to TALK about shrek the musical
@stockart whiteman No no, he means he wants Schaff to TALK about Shrek the Musical
Shrek 4D?
The comment section:
Cars is great: 1%
Cars is bad: 1%
Shrek 4: 98%
Shrek4 50 %
THAT WAS HIS MISTAKE 48%
Seriously, you guys have an obsession with Shrek. I'm very concerned.
@@nicoleberrios4366 What about the 2%
Funny Happy Studios amen brother
Me: Shrek five
Cars 1: racing
Cars 2: an intense spe-thriller about bringing money into the oil and gas industry through ruining the electric side of racing
Cars 3: racing
Another thing about toy story is that they even have a reason to have a personality because what do you do with toys as a kid?
You give them their own personalities
flob ll I suppose some people give their cars their own personalities as well (really not saying Cars is as good of an idea as Toy Story tho lol)
@Paul Martin stop
@JT the problem is that humans don't exist in that world so the cars aren't toys.
Also we as kids hope that could be alive and play with them since we consider them as friends. But I don't see anyone wanting their car to be alive
I will say cars can have their own personalities. Mine most certainly does. She can be a real brat, acts up alot, prefers to sit than be driven unless its been a few days and she needs a blowout, and i have to make deals with her to do things so she gets me where i need to go (usually getting me back home)
"Why are they cars?"
Little kids like toy cars. Oh look a movie where your cars have personalities. Now the little kid can connect more with their favorite toy cars!
Just my theory.
That's literally the reason. Along with the potential toy sales.
A film theory
This is true in every single way
Same reason toy story is about toys. To sell toys. Inside Out was good but I doubt it cracked the number of toy sales Cars did. I don't think I've ever met a kid who loved it and wanted to be an emotion when they grew up, but you know how many kids love Cars? You're just shitting on something you don't really get that was never really for you to get in the first place.
@@sweeety969 there is a lot more comments about cars worse than this buddy,he is just sharing his little "theory"
Okay but like I want to know HOW THEY REPRODUCE I DONT UNDERSTAND IT
Maybe its like Robots, where they build them?
@@crowthewicked8344 Well, in Planes, there's a character that's literally a flying car, and he says that he's "one of six flying cars ever BUILT." Therefore, the cars are built.
Edit: OMG, thanks for all the likes.
@@Kerbydragon but then there's this weird line from the forklift truck lady, who's talking about two twin planes:
"I heard they used to be one plane and were separated at BIRTH."
DISNEY EXPLAIN
@@applebee28 It's possible that being built is the car version of being born.
if you believe the pixar theory then i know a good video by a youtube channel called supercarlinbrothers in the video they made a theory where the cars kind of wake up relative to when the humans got them.
video they explain this:ua-cam.com/video/dEfULfbCZms/v-deo.html
IMO, the first movie Cars movie is an unironic masterpiece! Shit on the sequels, spin-offs, and TV shows all you want, but the first movie is just a really warm, cozy, nostalgic movie about an asshole having a turnaround!
🏎🏆🏁
Schaffrilla: “Cars can’t age”
Rust: “am I a joke to you”
So rust killed Doc Hudson?
Couldn't he just get some good restoration and wash?
Plus what about mechanical problems, if you ever own a car with 100,000 plus miles you know it's pretty much 60+
I thought you were the real Projared for a second and nearly shit myself.
@@hgrubb3317 yes and he blew his engine which is like a heart attack
7:52 what they mean by old age is not that they biologically get older and lacking energy, but getting older in comparison to the other cars which are more advanced and optimized.
McQueen is just as fast as he's always been, it's just that everyone else is now faster.
Think of ut this way, the person who held the 100m dash record in 1920 by default was very fast, but it was only fast in comparison to other racers in that time period. As time goes on, things like a rubberized track are created, techniques like starting off with feet on blocks were discovered, and health and diet is generally improved, making it easier for everyone to be faster and thus making it easier and easier and eventually inevitable for someone to break it.
You can only go so fast before someone beats you to it
@powerstar 2028 worse for the average man, but not for the athlete. People like Tom Brady have super atrict and restrictive diets.
Ok but who is inventing the new and advanced cars?
*Illuminati*
jessie owens ran a world record 10.2 in 1932 which would qualify for the final in the 2016 Olympics
@@ofclown9458 but it no longer would win or even get close to winning.
*Wait, so quick question:*
Does Lighting McQueen have to get _Life insurance_ or _Car Insurance?_
I would say both. Probably. Good point though
My idea was that car insurance was like medical insurance. Injuries, checkups, treatments. Life insurance is probably the same.
Yes
The Avatar people don’t get “human insurance” so car insurance probably wouldn’t exist in their world. Lightning McQueen life insurance gang
Yes
I'm pretty sure, in Cars 3, they explained that old age was related to being outdated. Newer cars had more efficient engines, streamlined designs, etc. All his opponents were more advanced. There is only so much you can do to improve an old car without making it a whole new car by replacing all its parts. McQueen had to retire because he couldn't keep up with automotive innovation.
I'm pretty sure Doc's death can just be excused as a dead car. One that just doesn't turn on or work anymore.
Cars 1: never forget your small town roots, always try to appreciate the little things in life
Cars 2: you shouldn't push away your friends just because they're annoying (maybe? Idk it's a bit hard to find one for 2)
Cars 3: someday, you won't have quite the same pep in your step that you used to, but when that day comes, you can always be a beacon of knowledge for the next generation
You've just done what no one else could do. Perfectly find the moral of the movie made by Hitler called Cars 2
I can understand that Cars 2 was a terrible sequel and it dishonoured the franchise, but when I was a kid it was super engaging for me and it had a somewhat plot. I feel like Cars 2 is a movie that can pretty much only be enjoyed by kids and adults will always find its flaws.
But also, Cars 2 was one of the first PIXAR movies I had ever watched, and to date I associate this movie with PIXAR. I have too many memories with this movie to actually start hating it. I don’t really understand the guff it gets. So honestly, I appreciate Cars 2 more than Cars 3 because of nostalgia.
I get the points but it has nothing to do with.... Cars...
Cars two was such a waste of tax money and time
Cars 2 is probably the one in the trilogy where the characters being the cars have the most meaning as well
I was waiting for a Shrek 4 Review
Like you promised
*Angery Noise*
DJ Tile Turnip technically, he promised the title of the video would be shrek
also I really want a shrek the musical review.
@@mujiescomedy279 he said "Next time baby" about it in his Megamind review, so hes still lying lol
Angry Shrek 4 noise
He can’t, we loves it enough
"Cars aren't alive in real life"
>Toy Story has joined the chat
Monsters aren’t alive in real life either
>Monsters Inc joined the chat
Animated characters aren’t alive in real life either
"Toys are alive in real life"
Are you sure about that?
@@fogernelion1949 I suspect the OP's point was that the video says that Toy Story is conceptually sound "because toys are alive" and Cars is not conceptually sound because "cars aren't alive in real life" and this is a flawed argument as you already have noted.
@@jme6036 >Disney World has joined the chat.
The longer I watched, the more sure I was that this video HAD to be ironic, I even went and checked if it was uploaded on April 1st. There's another comment that explains this way better than I ever could, but Schaff seems to have completely missed the point of Cars, being a love letter to NASCAR, and US car culture, which is so unusual for him. Also, imo it's silly to judge this movie harshly for not following the same formula as all the other ones, almost as silly as a movie about talking cars 😉
It's schafrillas he has sp many bad takes it's unreal
They always show these cars living in complex environments yet I still don't understand how the hell they can even do basic tasks like picking up a brick.
Nigel Joaquin the forklifts seem pretty dexterous
Forkliftes, or they have a hand cart forklift like thing, or in the case of Mater, hook and chain.
@@nickrustyson8124 k but how are they _made_
Life uh....always finds a way.
Maybe they use their tongues
"How did Doc Hudson die?"
He didn't want to be in Cars 2 so he drove off a cliff.
He went to the junkyard and used for scrap
That’s quality
That makes way more sense
😂😂😂😂😂
So would that be self destruction or suicide?
I’m confused, wasn’t the title going to be *_”Give us the Shrek 4 review”_* ??
True
You're right!
OH MY GOD I AM SO SORRY I STOLE YOUR JOKE
Akorn yea I wanted that
@Nikodimos Triaridis no that was my steak
Did anyone ever wonder how weird Piston Cup is? Like, imagine if there was a running competition called Quadriceps Cup, and the winner would get a trophy shaped like a quadiceps? (it's the big muscle on the frontside of your thigh that does most of the work when running)
Wait
Cars 3 is literally just Rocky 4 minus the Anti-USSR semitic
So its worse
The one setting where 'i must break you" would completely deflate as a threat.
Yukicraft it unfortunately doesn’t have a ten minute loop is Sylvester Stalon listing to music and remembering the same four seconds.
Nah, feels more like Talladega Nights
I think you mean anti ussr sentiment
I just want to say the only thing about Toy Story 4 that upset me a bit was that Bonnie previously promised Andy she'd look after them, but she tossed Woody aside later 😭 I know she's a kid and that's what they do, but damn, still hurt me
there's so much wrong with toy story 4 but like as a big fan of toy story that weirdly felt like such a betrayel, because of how contrived it is. I want to also say "I know she's just a kid" but it's so clearly a made up aspect just to prompt the 4th movie (which is just a cash grab) that it detracts from the quality of the toy story 3 ending which is the worst sin imaginable.
@@slightlyoffensivedadjokes so one problem is enough to ruin the movie
@@mr.preston1632 there's so many things I was just listing my main reason. it is a shame because the animation is fucking gorgeous and it makes me sad that so much work went into a movie with an ill conceived story.
And, it makes sense that Woody realises it's pointless to try to make Bonnie happy. She promised she'd look after him, and then lost interest in him. It becomes obvious his purpose of being a toy left with Andy, and that he'd have to forever fight to get that same kind of attention from Bonnie. I'm honestly glad Toy Story 4 was made, even if so many people were against it. It shows that it's okay to not fulfil the function you were "built" for. Woody found a new life he never thought possible. It's inspiring.
@@cynicat74 that was beautiful
Schaffrillas doesn’t seem to realize that real life cars do, in fact, age and break down and eventually die.
No, I'm pretty sure cars aren't alive.
@@deadaccount8054 As a machine.
@@deadaccount8054 cars are alive if you are a car guy
@@deadaccount8054 well not literally but they do 3 words of those happens to cars
@@deadaccount8054 mhm sure grandpa whatever you say, lets get you back to bed
“Why did they have to be cars”
It’s pretty simple, cars are cool, kids live cars, it’s fun to watch, it had never been done before
In other words, Pixar sold out. Also, sentient vehicles have been done before
director: i have a brilliant idea for a spy movie!
coworker: but sir you still have to make the cars sequel.
director: uhhhh
Question of the day:
Which spy movie is worse?
Cars 2 or Spy Kids 4?
Schaff talking about how the cars being cars serves no purpose made me realize how solid the concept of Thomas and Friends is. The original concept was literally "If an engine had a face, what would it say?" The first few seasons of the show use this concept wonderfully by keeping everything grounded in reality. The stories revolve around things like engines forgetting to pull certain trains, engines refusing to pull freight trains and getting in trouble as a result, certain railways shutting down, etc.
it's such a shame mattel did everything in their power to make thomas anything BUT a real life steam engine.
@@becdoesyoutube I hear King K Rool music in this video🎵🎵.
Good point
@@alex.g7317 It’s fairly easy to make a show about anthropomorphic animals without thinking too much about how everything else works. The same can't be said for vehicles.
@Muis! wtf...
But you gotta admit, the murder in Cars 2 was slightly shocking
Henry Yarbrough there was a murder? :o
I didn’t watch it xD
I really did NOT expect that from Cars when I was a kid. That was some deep shit right there
I remember seeing that scene when I was like ten and being SO disturbed by it. wtf pixar?
My guess is that they were trying to incorporate the spy theme by doing that
Are you talking about when they turned that car at the start into a visible metal cube for all the children to see, or are you talking about when they made that muscle car speed that fast that he blew up, I'm sure that in Care 2 there's more counts of murder which I've not noted.
if the cars franchise has a million fans, I am one of them. If the cars franchise has 10 fans I am one of them. If the cars franchise has one fan, that one is me. If the cars franchise has zero fans, then I am dead.
Cars 1: Talladega Nights
Cars 2: Almost every Mission Impossible film
Cars 3: Rocky IV
Cars 4: Ferris Bueller's Day Off
Cars 5: Pulp Fiction
Did I forget the scene in Cars 1 where Lightning McQueen's kids cussed up a storm at the dinner table?
The3diamonds chip I’m ten years old and I’ll beat your ass!
Cars 4: Weekend at Bernies
I think that the original Cars movie wasn't about taking a premise like "what if cars were alive" and running with it. It was a love letter to the old highway system and old Route 66, en era of American culture that was uniquely American, and that ended far too quickly.
and it was originally supposed to be about an electric car trying to fit in with a gas-powered society
Exactly! I feel like so many people miss this key idea about the first Cars movie. I loved the original cars as a kid, and so did my parents. Because they loved the homage it was paying to that old, classic American highway culture and the attention it called to those old towns that flourished from it but soon deteriorated once it left our society.
One thing above all else is it was designed to appeal to NASCAR fans. It’s literally a NASCAR movie where the main aspect of a NASCAR race, the cars, are the main characters. The human aspect is removed entirely.
yea, that’s the main aspect of the movie
@@ortherner it was a very L take by Schafrillas
In the scene where Lightning McQueen is being held in court, there is a painting that depicts a line of cars strolling out of a factory after being created, which (evidently) confirms that the cars species is manufactured. It's interesting because, for all of the questions that fans have held about the universe over the years, no one seems to bring up this detail.
It also might be some kind of allegory of the cars' modern society, like "we're so alienated it's like we're mass produced"
So do the factory owners just own the rights to BIRTH ITSELF? Or more disturbingly, is it just one factory that builds cars on its own? Like, it doesn't have a face like the cars and planes and boats, it just _does,_ and will for all eternity. If there are multiple factories, does that make the painting equivalent to a painting of a woman giving birth? If my scp-esque factory theory is true, does that make it a painting of *_GOD?_*
@@KyrieFortuneMaybe it could be a visual interpretation of the creation of life, with the factory representing God, like Michelangelo's The Creation of Adam. Huh, interpreting the painting figuratively gives us an explanation for the painting, but taking the painting literally lets us theorize explanations for the car species', and disturbing ones at that! And disturbing theories are FUN!
I think people noticed it but they don't want to bring it up because it isn't as interesting as some theories suggest
The painting on the left shows a car version of Justitia, the Roman godess of justice, which implies a car equivalent of the Roman empire and its mythology
“Why are they cars?”
So they could get away with that flashing joke in the first film.
Teacher: why are you laughing?
Me: nothing.
My brain: *the fault in our cars*
good one bro, that was a kneeslapper
Pho change ur profile picture
@@junglistmassiv but why
this was a good one
Pho noodle doesnt deserve that
Disney has been making live action nowadays. Wait until cars get its own live actio-
*STOP.*
*_U H O H_*
This is nowhere it, chief
🎶Lightning McQueen...🎶
🎶Live action machine!🎶
🎶Starring The Roooooock-🎶
_gentle shudder_
As a huge ass dinosaur nerd, calling the asteroid a comet gave me extreme pain-
astronomy and/or astrology, eh?
@@timur5241 If you were genuine: what the heck?
If it is was a joke: lmao 😂
As an astronomy Nerd, we do not know what object killed the dinosaurs.
Both asteroids and comets can impact Earth, and they have roughly the same effect.
If the impactor had water, and some of that water had been captured in cristals, like zircon cristal, and some of those cristals had survived the impact, we could collect them and analyse the deuterium concentration of the water. As the deuterium concentration is different in asteroids and comets, we could then know what impacted the Earth.
But that's a really big "If" and I don't think such a study was ever attempted.
Oh god I'm giving this way too much thought.
those pronated hands and weirdly shaped tyrannosaurus head gave me extreme pain.
Op is 6
finally a video that validates my 5 year old self leaving the theatre in 2005 because i thought cars was so unenjoyable
Wow guys we got ourselves the cool kid here, everyone step away
I think the reason lightning was old was because there were the new, better, faster cars. I thought that was pretty obvious.
Yeah, the plot revolved around the world becoming more advanced and leaving him behind, not that he himself was aging. Just how Doc was an older car and that communicated his "age" or whatever. I'm not that invested in the Cars universe but that was s u p e r obvious.
Props for making the comment before I needed to.
Machines get old and outdated, and eventually break. I guess I was wrong for assuming that was common knowledge.
I agree with the video that you can't really tell at a glance Lightning is "older" in the 3rd movie, but that's because you're supposed to infer that from the story's context. Like all the times they call him old, and all the times he worries about not keeping up with newer competitors. Which is the whole movie.
Why couldn’t lightning get a new engine or better tires or something?
Cars can get better parts for themselves and there are plenty of ways to improve an old car.
@@pjdixon6199 The problem is that brings into effect the Ship of Theseus theory. If a car keeps getting its parts replaced and eventually gets all its parts replaced, is it still the same sentient being, or is it a totally new one? Did Doc get all his parts replaced and become a totally new person? What if someone managed to bring together most of his old body parts and rebuild him; would that be Doc? And if it is considered to be Doc and/or has Doc's sentience, would it be considered a medical procedure or straight-up necromancy?
@@DetectiveNyx They explored that a bit in Planes 2. I'm sure they could've pushed the concept a little further in Cars 3 as well (heck, maybe even Cars 2, and there's even a deleted scene from Cars 1 exploring that a bit too), but they didn't take as many risks as Planes in that regard. Which is quite surprising to me.
hey do they get life insurance or car insurance?
Yes
I dunno, does Mike Wazowski wink or blink?
Rubie Evergreen yes
How do they exist? Are they made or born?
Memeinator yeah
Disrespect. You didn’t call it “Shrek 4 review” shame on you
When Schaffrillas Productions makes a review on Shrek Forever After, would it be "Why Shrek Forever After is an Underrated Masterpiece" or "Why Shrek Forever After is Flawed Yet Underrated".
I actually like Shrek Forever After.
Kieran Stark Recien que the recien y the recien tema que es recien me tr erizo todo bien recien ahora etérea que tengo ganas ni nada r
When Cars 2 came out I thought each installment in the franchise was going to be based on a different type/genre of movie. 1st movie was racing/slowing down, 2nd movie was spies, maybe the 3rd movie would be full blown romcom. I thought it would have been funny and interesting to see each movie be a different genre but with the same characters.