Bumping and Grinding into Trouble
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 тра 2023
- The plaintiff and defendant met through a social club and became close friends. The plaintiff sold the defendant her car and the contract said the defendant would make all the payments, but then she stopped paying, so the plaintiff is suing for breach of contract. The defendant is countersuing for a refund on the car.
- Розваги
The Plaintiff kept saying, "No, No, No, No, No, No!" And Judge Mathis said back, "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah!" I was hollering!!!😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
I really thought they were going to run to each other and hug after reminiscing over the deceased son. 😢
Same here.
@@dFreemZ Exactly what I thought! Pleased to know I wasn't the only one!
So did I !!!
pluntiffa was gonna run up on a azz whoopn 😬
Ryte
As soon as she said Social club, I knew it was finna be some drama
Exactly...a bunch of mess. Not interested.
With friends like that I prefer to have enemies… lol!
How does someone get to use a car for 16 months for free? Makes zero sense! It’s so annoying when judge Mathis asks a question then don’t let them talk and yells over them then yells his judgement before they can even finish arguing their case. No other judge would have ever let her get 5k back when she used the car everyday for 16 months! Thank god she don’t have to actually pay the 5k judgment n the show pays it!
How??? Literally because the plaintiff agreed to pay the defendant back. JM was only enforcing the agreement that the plaintiff had made with the defendant
She should have gone to judge Judy aint no way
I agree that he should not have given her the money back because she used the car but I understand he was only enforcing the last written agreement they made. My position is that why didn’t she just give her the account number? all she had to do was follow up every month and make sure she paid it on time. I think that the payment probably was 250 and not 350 and she was making her a little pocket change and did not want her to know. Paying parking tickets have nothing to do with paying the car note to the finance company. And the defendant still has the car so obviously, it’s not being repossessed. sounds like a messy azz friend got in between them about this car. Not sure about that part.
I agree, he should atleast knocked some of the money the plaintiff owes off,considering the defendant had the car for 16 months..
@@maxxpopp2373 exactly! Seemed real fishy! The defendant found out that the plaintiff was getting over on her and the plaintiff felt guilty and agreed to give that lady her money back because she knew she had overcharged her from the beginning!
Partying seven a week and don't seem understand why they're losing their children to gun violence....♻️
EXACTLY,👍🏾👏🏿
sounds like defendant still partying. cause that’s where she claims she got the latest scoop bout what “skittles“ 😫 had done with her /them vehicle payments. and i’m so aggravated bout that 😫 wtf kinda parties is yo married azz always at?
That’s a heartless statement. I hope nothing ever happens to one of your family members. The culprit was the person that shot her son.
@supercayana When you hear the same stories over and over, you have to start looking at someone else besides the "culprit" ♻️♻️♻️
@@supercayana If you're out partying almost 7 days a week, you certainly aren't providing quality parenting and home environment for your children. You're basically leaving them to be raised by strangers and the streets if you're so preoccupied with partying. That's a sure way to get the streets to take your kids life, either from prison for living that street live, or being eliminated in street violence.
This is sad. They used to be such close friends.
Your friends is your enemies
Only became friends because of tragic deaths of their sons. Not really a genuine friendships.
@@tjbooker9948only the defendant had a son that died. @danquahk830 they were really only "friends" as they call themselves, because of a social group.
@@mikeprice8307 NO false friends are enemies.
@@tjbooker9948 Just my opinion, but this financial arrangement that they had would be enough to break family members apart. I just can't see taking over someone else's loan without knowledge of the finance company. Driving a car that you assume your "friend" whom you are paying is paying it to the finance company. Bad business decision.
All the problems started with a gossip from a mutual “friend” she met in a party.. and now, they about to kill each other. Be careful who you reveal your business to.
Actually, I think the problem started with their agreement about the car from the beginning. I know there may have been credit-type circumstances but paying for someone else's car loan was not a good move. That was okay, but the legal and financial arrangement should have been more clear and solid. (i.e. defendant paying directly to the finance company giving plaintiff proof each month). I wonder about the insurance and upkeep arrangements too.
So she got to drive the car for 16 months for free?
Yes, when the plaintiff stupid self agreed to pay her all the money back!
According to the plaintiff's say so.
I can’t believe he let that slide. That could have been a promise she decided to take back. That was weird to me
Right. I think about them miles. However, she didn’t add that into the agreement and courts goes by black and white
That big ol chick gonna knock Skittles to the rainbow
🤣🤣🥊
@@elwin38 😩😂
The bigger they are the harder they fall. The Plaintiff should've clocked her. The Defendant was ALL mouth. Guaranteed I would've knocked her out cold and shut that BIG mouth up with the quickness - LOL!!!
Why would you say that? Because she’s BIG?
Please don’t ever start gambling ma’am. You’d lose everything. Size means nothing. She couldn’t even make the plaintiff flinch! She was standing calmly next to Doyle WAITING for her to connect so she could grab a leash and walk the dog!
😂😂😂😂😂
The defendant ungrateful AF
How so? Askin for information, not necessarily disagreeing with you.
@@sereneamani1713 that's extremely disingenuous of you to say. You've been under every single comment talking about how the ungrateful defendant is right. And how it's all the plaintiffs fault. You came to this comment to ONLY disagree 🤣🤣
Extremely ungrateful because clearly she couldn't get a car on her own 🙄 then she too old to be listening to gossip, wtf. She wanted smoke with the Plaintiff, clearly. She's jealous even though she's the one who was getting married. If the Plaintiff hadn't lost her cool in the text and agreed to that BS, she would've won.
They should have taken this case to Judge Judy.
I was thinkin the same thing, Judge Judy wouldn't have gave the defendant nothing.
Judy would’ve said defendant rented vehicle
I be trying to watch her. I just can’t for some reason.
@@Mr21022102 same 😂😂
There's many judges in their real-life jurisdiction that they could have taken the case to. Judge Judy is a better judge in the opinion of SOME people.
I believe everything the defendant said. It doesn’t make sense for someone to make consistent payments and then all of a sudden stop. If the plaintiff had nothing to hide, why not let the defendant pay or write a check to the finance company? Because that car was on the verge of repossession!
Exactly! Everybody stuck on the plaintiff's looks but baby girl was being foul towards the defendant from the beginning and I believe she agreed to give the defendant her money back because she knew she had been caught and the defendant knew she had been taking money from her
@@Melissa-ii2ix facts!!!!
The plaintiff stated that in order for the defendant to deal with the finance company she would need the plaintiffs SS#…I wouldn’t give out mine either..defendant should have refinanced it and gotten it in her own name..she could have made the check out to them though and given to the plaintiff
@@slbostick8471 well the plaintiff agreed to give the defendant back the money for a reason. Probably because the plaintiff was making the defendant pay extra for the car the entire time and felt guilty once the defendant called her out on it
It's all here-say between both the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff is saying that the defendant was late for many of the car payments and never sent money for the late fee. The defendant is going by here-say regarding the car being on a repo list. So the bottom line is the defendant had the chance to go obtain a loan and pay the lady in full. I don't like her attitude after needing the plaintiff for so much & after having such a beautiful person in her life when she was really down.
So sad because the defendant will never find another person that cares that much ever again. Life doesn't go like that.
Look at Doyle face at the end
They had him💩🧱
@@freereign911 😂
😂 This is the comment I was looking for.
Doyle like “alright you to ratchets better not start fighting, come on” 😂 at the end.
Almost everyone is a ratchet, because blows may be passed when it comes to money on any socioeconomic level.
Can Doyle EVEN stop a fight?
I don’t think they’re ratchets.
Why would she get her money back when she had access to the car for months....what kind of ruling foolery is this????
Skittles about to taste the rainbow. LMAO ... The defendent got the $5,600 because the plaintiff agreed to give it to her if she returned the car. That's the deal she struck. Also, she should have just gon ahead and gave the woman the info to the finance company, or at the very least sent her the payment confirmations after she paid the note. It's not unreasonable for someone to want to make sure the payments are being made, especially of there are allegations of a potential repo.
Your comment is so sensible!
Poor Doyle, y’all don’t pay him enough👀😬
So she got to use the car free this whole time ?
Looks like it!
Don’t make sense
Because the plaintiff agreed to the terms. Had she not agreed to pay the defendant, JM most likely wouldn't have made her pay
The plaintiff agreed to give all of the defendant money back after the return of the vehicle. JM only enforce the agreement.
Yes but she agreed to it so that’s her fault.
Wow they a mess. First they crying over the son passing then act a fool in court. Wow. Just ratchet and classless
Ratchet and classless. Describes most of the U. S. A, if not the world.
Plantiff : No, no , no , no
Judge : Yeah, yeah , yeah , yeah
😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why do some Women feel like they can claim Men they were never in a relationship with and try to block their friends from dating the man, and to top it off this lady is married and still haten. Because you like someone that doesnt like you does not make them off limits
Truth 😊
Plus nobody owes anybody unless they married
BUT the defendant didn't CLAIM the man. What you are saying makes all sense though. However, the so-called girl (or man) code has a place. If my "friend" indicates interest in someone, I would step back. But things happen and people become attracted to one another. However, in this case, this was a minor situation one night at a club from what I understand. So, it shouldn't have been a big deal.
@@beb5407 This situation was soooo minor, unless I am something. The plaintiff is making a big deal over nothing in that particular situation.
Why was the defendant so angry? She won her case all that heavy breathing and smack talking was not necessary
Exactly. Be outta breath before landing the first punch in a fight she’d lose! You’ve already used 90% of your energy by huffing and puffing and smack talking. What else you got?
@@squawprincess she sounded like she was outta breath just standing there talking. Idk why some people think size matter I done seen big girls get dropped before tf lol
@@thesavagery6696 exactly. Hard too!
I can just tell she’s a bully because even after winning the case she still wanted to fight on national tv in a court setting.
@@squawprincess a HUGE bully. And the judge granting that money to her over a text argument which was not valid, it's like loan sharking. I can't believe he did that..smh..
Big girl was finna tear shorty up out there with Doyle 😂😂😂
I guarantee she wasn’t. She didn’t have the plaintiff shook at all.
I can’t stand when big people try to intimidate people with smaller frames. Being built like the capital building does not mean you can fight!
The plaintiffs actions tells me all I need to know! I’ll put my $$$ on the plaintiff. She never flinched, not one bit.
Kind of like when a person is loud talking a bunch of hoorah gets the beat down of their life by the silent one!
@@squawprincess Dang. What happened to you?
@@sereneamani1713 idk. Explain what you mean?
Y do she have to pay when defendant drive the car for months tf outa here
I wouldn’t give her nothing catch me n traffic 🫣🤷🏽♀️
I see both sides of the argument. The problem is the plaintiff agreed to pay her back all the money 🤦🏾♂️😂
BOTTOM LINE & POINT BLANK
She was built like a champ
It doesn't make sense to pay the defendant any money, she didn't drive it for free
It doesn’t. But the plaintiff wrote up an agreement to do just that and submitted it to the judge and wanted it enforced. She is the one that should’ve never told the defendant, I will give you all your money back in exchange for that car. this really leads me to believe that the payment that she was charging the defendant probably was not the payment that was due to the finance company and she did not want her to know. I think she was making her a little bit of pocket change off the car. maybe hundred dollars extra each month which ain’t much but hey she bout was doing it
@@maxxpopp2373 it's kind of like enforcing loan sharking. It's one-sided and unethical which is why no judge will enforce. People signed contracts and make an agreement to pay back ridiculous amount of money. But THIS judge letting the defendant be able to drive a car for free for a whole year, because the plaintiff signed a ridiculous contract that is also one-sided and unethical is a garbage move🤷🏽♀️
That’s messed up….
She the plaintiff shouldn’t have to pay the defendant back the entire $ 5,600.00
The plaintiff should have argued that the defendant owes her for rental for the west and tear and usage of the car for the 16 months it was in her possession.
Exactly! Why should she get back 5000 after driving the car for over a year??! Horrible judgment
Yessss exactly what I was about to comment! Judge Mathis don’t ever want to let anyone talk and talks over them then yells his judgment before she could even finish defending his case. Luckily she don’t have to actually pay the 5k and the show pays the judgment!
The plaintiff is to blame! She STUPIDLY agreed to those terms!
JM ruled on the agreement, which is the fault of the plaintiff!
She agreed to pay the $5,600
I know what happen mam you ain’t gotta tell me.. I been around 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 JM swear he know everything 😂😂
About a man that you weren't even dating and you are married??? That defendant is missing a few screws in reference to losing her friendship about the "bouncer".
The defendant is NOW married. She wasn't THEN. Many people are missing screws in this society, because this kind of thinking is rampant (fighting over relationships and non-relationships).
@Serene Amani well that's obvious, but it's clear at the time of the club incident that he was not her dude, and it was just a dance. Just silly.
@@urluvizmyluv1999 Right ! The guy wasn't even interested in her, and she's mad at her friend because they both liked each other? Getting mad about something like that is childish. The defendant needs to grow up 😂😂
@@urluvizmyluv1999 I agree, it was silly
It was silly... but that kind of thing shows character... one thing I'd never do is talk to or flirt with a guy that my friend dealt with in any capacity. Cuz like why? Lol. And there have been several that tried and all got shot down point blank. My fave line was "Nah, we don't get down like that." And I found that really easy to do. So I do question women who do that kind of thing. All that said It sounds like there were a number of reasons why they fell out. It would be overboard to have this much drama over that one situation
This situation is 😔 they were such "Good Friends", this is what happens when messing with friends over 💰 or a car, sometimes family
No, this is what happens when you don't write and enforce the contract properly.
They weren't friends. They just had a tragedy in common. Some people don't comprehend what friendship really represents.
When the show started they Say they were friends but I guess with friends like this who need enemies
@@wandabellamy6120 that's true they were friends. the judge making the plaintiff pay is like enforcing loan sharking. People agree to the ridiculous amount of money to be paid back but no judge will enforce it bc it's one sided and unethical. That ungrateful defendant got to use a car for free just because the plaintiff made an agreement that is also one-sided and unethical. Judge Judy wouldn't have tolerated that🤷🏽♀️
I was the bouncer they're referring to. Was the best night of my life. 🤣🤣🤣
This comment is all 🧢!! Actually, I was the bouncer that the litigants were talking about in the club that night, and the other commentor was working coat check that same night!! Bet 💯%!! ⚖️
@@isiahwarner3087 Facts!!!😂😂😂
😂
I was done when the defendant stating that they called the plaintiff "skittles"😂. Y'all too grown for this. Stop it. 😂
Lmao😂😂😂
There's a reason she never met her husband 🤔
Good point!
He did exactly what every Judge will do when there is a written agreement. This is a pure example why people should stop doing Hood agreements! I worked in the legal field for over 16yrs….it’s always the same thing! We agreed verbally! No Judge is going to take a verbal contract. Always put it in writing….even through a text, email, on a napkin or even toilet paper! And if you make a new arrangement/agreement, put that in writing also! When she said okay, I’ll give you your money back that was the new amended contract. This is a good lesson to learn! Here’s another free lesson for you…..if a person puts the car in their name and then gets mad and wants to take it from you….that is called an illegal repossession! You can sue them for ALLLL your money back! You can not repo a car unless the payment has been late at least 90 days, thats 3 months straight, in a row. Example: if I pay you August, and miss September and October, then November, then miss December and January, that is still not 90 days straight! And also, if you let someone move in with you, and you decide to put them out……you must go to court to evict them. You can’t just get mad and say get out! Nope! That’s called an illegal eviction. Best things are do not give cars to people without a written contract….and if you let someone live with you do not allow them to receive mail at your house. Write a month to month contract! Okay…..there’s your free legal information. Stop practicing Hood Law‼️😮
When did a verbal agreement become HOOD law? 👀
@@jew-el1 when you didn’t get it in writing….you see how it worked out. A verbal agreement is nothing but your word against mine 😵🤭✌️
Thats not a fair judgment at all. Basically she got to drive a car for free. Thats BS. Judge Judybwpuld have never allowed that. I do not agree with JM decision
The clothes these young mothers wear..especially to court!
She didn't want tht car , she wanted that money 😅
Defendant..is so ungrateful..she tried to help her and this is her repayment..she drives her car for free..KARMA
But why did the plaintiff agree to this agreement? Something may be missing to our eyes.
The plaintiff stated that in order for the defendant to deal with the finance company she would need the plaintiffs SS#…I wouldn’t give out mine either..defendant should have refinanced it and gotten it in her own name
So she basically had a car for 16 months for FREE. Judge dead ass wrong. Should have only given her half back
That would have invalidated THEIR agreement.
Fellas fast forward to 9:28… you’re welcome. The plaintiff can have ALLLLLL my money !! 🥵🥵
The plaintiff is talking too tough for the defendant to not do something to that car before she gives it back.
Another case where he doesn’t listen. Spent too much time on “background “ and not enough on the actual subject.
As a woman this happens everyday where friendships end over a man.
True. I've seen men fall out for the same thing, but not as much as women (IMO). A lot of issues between men over seemingly other reasons of boil down to a dispute about their women.
Women should compete for good men.
@@tom11zz884 no
@@susiesolangesimpson2828
Then be prepared to stay single...lol
@@tom11zz884 I’m not single. Sorry.
Why the plaintiff wearing that outfit to court?
This is soo funny and hilarious. At first, they started with friendship and comforting each other. The court room was quite due to her son's death, even judge Mathis, was even sobered. Apparently, it was just the beginning of the Sharlock Holmes movie. The woman in blue dress just became a dragon. Even after the judgement, mehn mehn mehn. She was about to deck the first punch. It went from shedding tears to unleashing the dragon. There is a saying that goes like this "From frying pan to fire".
Typical women
The defendants looks like the type to think she’ll win by default because of her size! She probably grew up as a bully! Size means nothing! Notice how at the final thought moment at the end with Doyle, when that linebacker tried to make her flinch, my girl the plaintiff didn’t budge! She’s definitely about that life and STAY READY!
I’d put my money on the plaintiff YALL!
If Sister linebacker keep playing with folks like HER (based on size) she’s bound to be picking herself up off the ground with her back dirty! 🤷🏽♀️
@@squawprincess the plaintiff is the bully. Her mouth is too slick. I dont see the defendant as the bully but I’m 5’7 and my height has afforded me diff experiences.
@@squawprincess You are right 👍. I can concur on the statement you made. She stood her ground and not show any sign of weakness.
@@squawprincess "looks like the type" = the epitome statement of bias and prejudice (literally pre-judgment without substantiation) based on personal thought and/or personal experience, etc. Your statement demonstrates more about who you are and where you come. BTW you and I probably come from the same place - culturally, etc.
Hey, Judge Mathis Family!!❤❤
Shawdy in the red got sumin back there 😂
The plaintiff got a tough shape....sheesh..
They needed to put a cloth over that lady iin the blue dress like they do in church cause her dress is too short for court TV. That's more like her club dress.
So that lady drive a car for 16 months for FREE? Putting wear and tear on it, getting tickets and getting all of her money back? Chile…
I don’t understand how Judge Mathis let her drive for free these cases I’ve seen the other TV Judges tell them they can’t benefit more. The owner of the car was not compensated
Doyle loves the petty fights 😂😂😂😂😂
Big girl woulda tore Skittles behind up they was " Friends" Really DHO 😂😂😂
Why would you say that? Because she’s big?
So being big means you can carry a fight????? 🤔
Not where I’m from 😂
The bigger you are the deeper your print in the dirt 🤷🏽♀️
@@squawprincess chi please don't take it personal eye can give my opinion just like you Have A Great Day
@@jillcabler2186 not offended at all. I have no horse in this race and I don’t know these folks. You have every right to your opinion and I have every right to start a conversation by asking a question but if you don’t like conversation starters just say that. I’ll see myself out 😄
Be blessed
Their behavior was ridiculous. Every one talking over the other in court of all places. It made me dizzy.
People with children can't party every night of the week...children will definitely be Neglected.
Good job cameraman 🫡
You nasty 😂
No cap lol
So the defendant receives all her money back,even though she rode the car for 16 months, over a text argument.Thats some b.s and the judge could have considered that fact,but it's obvious he didn't like the plaintiff..
why are ppl still doing this ??
Why ppls think that 10 day grace period doesn’t mean late grace period is they not reporting the car to credit bureau
Judge Mathis got me hollering and hollering 😂
The plaintiff was not making the payments as agreed upon. She was wrong for that. She owes the defendant.
The officer be 3 chill like ..ya ok
Doyle needs back up.🤣
GET DRUNK ???????
Defendant loses her son to gun violence then gets sued by her so called friend here in court. I don't care if it's a friend or family you can't do anything for anyone. No loaning at all.
Its usually not a good idea, but it can be handled properly. The litigants didn't handle it well from the very beginning of the arrangement.
That's exactly what I was thinking!
If they lived in Texas that car would have been removed rain, shine, sleet, snow, ice storm, tornado, hurricane, etc etc. 😂🤣Texas repo drivers work 24/7 365 days a year!
The defendant looks like the type to think she’ll win a scuffle by default because of her size! I HATE FOLKS LIKE THAT! She probably grew up as a bully! Just because you’re big and burly don’t mean you can fight! Size means nothing! Notice how at the final thought moment at the end with Doyle, when that linebacker tried to make her flinch, my girl the plaintiff didn’t budge! She’s definitely about that life and STAY READY!
I’d put my money on the plaintiff YALL!
If Sister linebacker keep playing with folks like HER (based on size) she’s bound to be picking herself up off the ground with her back dirty! 🤷🏽♀️
You really have a thing about large people. It's typical though. You really must have a thing since you repeated this comment.
@@sereneamani1713 I repeated the comment because it’s ignorant to think that simply because a person is big they can fight!
Do you agree? Or like many other commenters on here you think size matters?
You don’t watch wrestling or extreme fighting do you? 😉🤣
@@sereneamani1713 btw. Is there something wrong with repeating a thought??
I mean, YOU did it! 🤣🤣🤣
Thanks for the laugh though smh
Facts....she didn't move ... Not once 😂
They about to go to jail before they leave the court room.
It's sad how material things can break up a friendship not to mention the planiff was there for the lost of her son. This is sad..
The 'Get it Girls'? How simple. A Master Teacher has outlined that a large percentage of blk women don't mature past 14 years of age....most definitely a fact. The 2/3rds club is depressing
Wow! Talking about ungrateful. Stayed with you until your son took his last breath, called to check on you every day after and allowed you to get a car in her name, that you never paid on time. You’re mad about her dancing in the club 5/6 years ago. This is why I don’t want to help anyone do anything anymore
The plaintiff if shouldn't have to pay her anything. If she wants to return the car, then return the car.
The defendant was not entitled to the whole money. It Should have been treated as a car hire
So The Defendant Had The Vehicle Drove It, Got Tickets & Added Miles But Gets The Money She Paid Back 🤔 How Is That Fair - So When I Get Rental Cars I Can Drive It Return It And Get My Money Back Too 😂
why would she not give her the account number to pay direct to the finance company? All plaintiff has to do is contact the finance company each month and make sure she’s paying it on time. The payment probably was 250 and not 350. that’s probably why she didn’t want to give it to her. she bout was making her an extra $100 a month pocket change off that car. Her paying tickets had nothing to do with giving her the account number to make car payments. I am surprised Judge Mathis gave the defendant money back as she used the car. They should’ve never made an agreement to give them their money back and exchange for the car, she should’ve just gave that girl the account number and let her paid directly. Like I said the payments probably wasn’t even $350 and she didn’t want her to know. And it couldn’t have been on Repo list because she still has the car.
The Plaintiff is Gorgeous 🥰🥰🥰🥰. But they both acted HOOD 😮😮😮
Red Wagon 🤪
This what makes it hard to help people. Cause people act entitled.
When will these folks learn not to mix business and friends. I'm glad I don't have to worry about this mess. I don't do friends or business 😏
Get it girl 443 where do they come up with these names 😂
Sounds like a sorority.
She positioned herself so she can be found. Men know those moves too.
She is suppose to be loyal to her friend not some man. When will women learn. Especially black women.
There's a party happening behind the plaintiff.
Facts 💯%!!
12:50.....The first time I actually thought Doyle needed back up with Top Flight security!! The defendant was ready to throw hands with the plaintiff, aka Skittles, outside the courtroom!! Bet 💯%!! ⚖️
What a disgrace. Go from a sisterhood and mourning together to wanting to fight over a blasted car…. Shameful 😮
Ha she think she won lol you have to pay her 5K then u get ur car back lol
Yeahyeahhhyeahhhhhyeahhh yeah 😂
Beginning of this bout had me in tears 😢😢😢😢
when the crawfish episode dropping⁉️
WILL NEVER!!!!!!! KNOW WHY SOME "WOMEN" HAVE TO RESORT TO FIGHTING...VERY UNLADY LIKE AND EXTREMELY FOOLISH!!!
the plaintiff looks very nice, I'm sorry 😞
That body is insane
Yea that thing is stacked
Maroon dress got cake back there
Money does terrible things to people
Plaintiff thick ❤
Judge mathis a mess 😂😂😂😂
Plaintiff looking good tho lol