The 747 did exactly that, it mowed the grass. I have a pretty big yard, so I'm considering getting a 747 to mow it in the future, it seems quick and efficient.
No doubt a bit of damage to the aircraft as well. After the rather loud bangs you can glimpse a few pieces of sizable ground equipment flying up, just missing the flaps and trailing edge of the wing. If you pause the video and step frame by frame (< > keys) you can see some large chunks of yellow steel flying past the window. Close call.
Virgin's A330 landing at SVD does this. It's quite exhilarating as a passenger. This it is because the gate is close to the threshold. They could do a longer landing, but then they would have to taxi all the way to the end of the runway, turnround, and taxi back.
The brakes on modern planes have to be strong enough to stop a fully loaded plane from takeoff velocity *with* the engines still at full forward thrust. See the video on the 777's rejected takeoff test on YT.
That 747 incident was apparently at Minneapolis St Paul (KMSP) runway 17 which is 147ft (44.8m) wide which is pretty standard and about the minimum a 747 can operate from.
The first video was a departure off of runway 17 at KMSP this past Sunday. The runway was previously shut down for a while - not entirely sure why (I didn't read the NOTAM), but apparently some grass was laid around the runway following the completion of the work. Typically from what I've seen, heavy departures are done on 12R/30L because it's the longest runway that they usually have in service, with the occasional A330 departure from 17, but I've never seen a 747 on it! Either way, the new grass didn't like the high trust takeoff the 747 used! I noticed today that MSP now has a NOTAM stating "MSP RUNWAY 17/35 CLOSED TO FOUR ENGINE AIRCRAFT"
Probably wasn't from the engines, they still wouldn't be hanging over the edge of the paved section, but an example of how powerful the wing vortices can be.
@@jp7585 There are many airports, such as Rotterdam Holland, that have runways less than 8000 ft that regularly take 747s. MSP Runway 17 was built from the start to meet all standards for Design Group V, which includes the 747. Jumbos, especially those from the west cargo area, do often use 17 for takeoff if they're only carrying a medium size load. As others have written, this wasn't a case of operating a plane on a marginal runway ...It was just a matter of fresh sod not having been given time to settle and root.
Nice to see a flight out of MSP. As a kid in college I used to love having lunch parked by the old barracks and watching Northwest 747s & DC9s take off.
I love spotting 💗 My first granddaughter was born in July. My daughter knows I adore planes and kept threatening to name her DC9 😅 She ended up naming her...Piper ❤❤❤ Close enough. She won't change her middle name to Cub, though. 😣
Like the short landings. Dropped into San Diego tonight and pilot missed the mark, had to get on thrusters and brakes really hard. Always fun landing here.
I expect in the first clip, there was newly laid sod adjacent to the runway. Sod takes a few weeks to knit into the soil. It can always be laid back down. Green side up this time, boys!
We had a 747 land at Grissom AFB IN. When it taxied off the parking spot, the ramp behind it was lifted right out of the ground. It was a 20 foot square chunk of concrete a couple of feet thick. Since the 747 would be routinely parked there, we had to rebuild that section of the ramp.
If you are approaching at a certain angle and your tail passengers can see the incoming tarmac, i’d say that to be cause for a quick regret clap. At least they’re not turning on their phones.
@@CapStar362 I imagine around that for the A320. Probably more like 125 to 135 when light. It’s what the B737 does and even the B747. It’s been a few years for the 74, but I recall 124 KTS for landing. What is that in MPH? Probably around 150, right? U made me look it up. 🤣. 124 KTS is 142.6 MPH.
As I'm just a passenger of planes, not a pilot....do the training simulators that Pilots use put them in situations where they have to negotiate cross winds?...and if so how severe are the testing wind patterns? I only ask out of curiosity after seeing that Astana Airbus A320 literally coming in almost sideways for a landing @ 1:53! That was some serious flying technique from the cockpit crew! Cheers From The Clouds In Ohio
@@jimmiller5600 Appreciate the feedback Jim! I figured there was "some" training on crosswinds and the like but wasn't sure how far the teaching part could go in a simulator compared to actually flying in those gusts of wind. The power to just toss those behemoths around is really incredible. Salute!
I´m a private pilot. Every pilot start to learn to land in crosswinds since they start flying small planes. Crosswinds are a part of flying. Actually, the technique used to land in crosswind in small planes is not that different to the one used in airliners.
@@TheStuport The kicker is that airline pilots have over 1,500 hours (approx) of experience before starting at a regional airliner as a co-pilot. After another thousand or two more hours and promotion to Captain they move up to the mainlines as a Co-pilot again. That's 2,500 to 3,500 hours in total, with the first 1,500 generally in piston aircraft which are light in both weight (stability) and thrust.
@@fastica Thanks so much for commenting on this Federico! It helps connect the dots for a cleared picture of what training is all about for pilots...private and commercial! Ciao From Ohio
Many years ago, around 1973, the USAF was converting a 747 into the E-4A airborne command post. The contractor was located at a municipal airport. Although many jet aircraft used the runway previously, when the E-4A took off those huge engines peeled off parts of the runway pavement. The once on line video is no longer available unfortunately.
Wow, that plane was all the way off the runway in the grass and the pilot managed to bring it back. Give that man a raise! Or let him be the chief instructor for passenger playing top gun School. 🇺🇲👍🏻👀
That pilot made a major mistake : He accepted to land with way to much of a crosswind. He should have aborted that landing and DEMAND to be directed to another runway more in line with the prevailing wind. The air controller was negligent by directing the landing to that runway, and the pilot reckless to accept and proceed with that uselessly dangerous landing.
You made one grave error. You forgot that youtube is full of people who (think they) know everything about everything and fucking LOVE to remind the world.
I just don't know about that last landing in the video. Extreme crab angle to port. Manages to land, but wind is so fierce it weathervanes the airplane into it, thereby causing the excursion to port? I mean, I'm not the greatest armchair pilot, but seems this is why they have alternates... Edit, for posterity and stuff: a) I have a directional dillema in my brain, when I say or type the left-right thing in question, whether it be left/right, east/west, or in this case, port/starboard (which I am being told quite vociferously in the replies is wrong, so my bad, won't happen again) and even Empty/Full if the gauge is oriented that way, I'll often without even noticing get it backwards. I absolutely meant starbo...er, right. Stupid brain. It's irritating and still goin' on years later and I have no idea why. Probably some kind of childhood trauma when trying to give directions... :p So both my faux pas are now explained, and sorry for the mess. *flips coin to barkeep*
If they’d have stopped any quicker I’d expect to see the pilots get tossed through the windshield. Jk. I’d be more concerned about the condition/wear of the brakes. Obviously it was a test so hopefully they were looked over
@@Skarry Airbus has a production plant in Britain, but Britain only holds a minor share in Airbus. In legal terms the civil aircraft division of Airbus is French, while the Airbus Group is Dutch. But in effect the governments of France Germany and Spain own most of the shares. And a small detail about supporting local economy: A A320 built in Alabama has more american work going into it than a Boeing 787 ;)
"you may have heard the engines making a strange noise just now. please rest assured that everything is fine, and we will continue with our flight as planned. the attendants will be along shortly to serve you your in-flight meal, which tonight is roast chicken"
The 747is a trip. We were doing crew training at the old Minot AFB in Montana and it snowed like hell and we used it as a snow blower cleaned off the whole ramp clean as a whistle.
During the same time the crew did a low pass, 50' agl and that was one of the most awesome things I ever expierenced. You could feel the pressure wave coming off the airplane.
@@ray076NL I know, but whats flying looks like dirt from the surrounding ground, not asphalt from the runway/pieces from the lighting... that's why im confused by the tittle.
2:32 This can happen during those "smooth landings" that people love to see. Taking your time before touchdown = less runway to slow down. Ryanair knows better.
When I read 747 destroys runway, I thought it would... I witnessed a REAL runway being destroyed during an airshow at Daytona Beach in the mid 80s by a Marine Harrier! It was hovering over the west end of the main runway - which had just been repaved. Suddenly chunks of asphalt blew into the air! There was concern by the Marines that the Harrier was struck, but the only damage was to the newly paved runway. The runway remained open but shortened. The airlines had to land several flights in Orlando and bus pax to Daytona until they adjusted their loads for the shortened runway. No video exists but I was a reporter for the ERAU newspaper and was taken out to see the damage and got photos... Long since lost...
In the comments, there is a link to submit videos. These videos are around the world, not possible for one person to film them all. Probably knows quite a few people to record stuff just in case, and send the videos their way as well for us all to enjoy.
@@ChristopherBurtraw if you go to most of the videos by original link, you will find "3 Minutes of Aviation" And a comment similar to - 3 Minutes of Aviation 6 days ago Stunning captures! May I feature a part of this video in one of my next episodes? Of course with a link back to your original video. Cheers! Eurofilms - Planes & Aviation 6 days ago Yes of course ^ ^ At least 3 Minutes - ASKS to use the videos unlike a dozen other channels just pulls them and the owner finds out and gets into a email war about it.
1:30 the coherent 150 kt motion of all the atoms in the airplane is converted into 2,000 mph random motion of atoms in the brake pads (assuming steel, carbon would be faster).
@@MrSchwabentier well the velocity goes as 1/sqrt(mass) of atom/molecule at fixed T. Radiated heat goes as T**4, so double the temp, and get 16x the radiation.
The SA 747 received no damage and continued to Singapore. The bird, however, received considerable damage and did not continue its flight.
But he did have to return to the runway though. A little over here, a little over there, and some way over there !
@@MatthewPettyST1300 MAY DAY MAY DAY MAY DAY I've been sucked through an engine and need to return to the airport immediately. I can land everywhere.
UNFORTUNTATELY BIRD WAS INJURED
@@Tker1970 In fact, it did land everywhere.
@E Van Which it did, but immediately spat it out. Must have been a bad flavor!
Airport management: "We need to mow the grass next to the runway."
747: "What grass?"
The 747 did exactly that, it mowed the grass. I have a pretty big yard, so I'm considering getting a 747 to mow it in the future, it seems quick and efficient.
@@brulaapgaapmeester8052 would be cleanup the "mow-ed grass"
And that, boys and girls, is why you never use sod adjacent to a runway.
Love the clapping on that final landing, followed by the clatter as it went off the runway. Oh well, any landing you can walk away from...
Reserve all clapping until, you're at the gate.
After veering off runway the landing gear could collapse and intrude into passanger cabin or cause a fire.
No doubt a bit of damage to the aircraft as well. After the rather loud bangs you can glimpse a few pieces of sizable ground equipment flying up, just missing the flaps and trailing edge of the wing. If you pause the video and step frame by frame (< > keys) you can see some large chunks of yellow steel flying past the window. Close call.
Another happy landing
Clapped too soon 😄
The a330 stopped really quick without reverse thrust, really impressive.
Virgin's A330 landing at SVD does this. It's quite exhilarating as a passenger. This it is because the gate is close to the threshold. They could do a longer landing, but then they would have to taxi all the way to the end of the runway, turnround, and taxi back.
poor mechanics that have to replace the brakes..bad for maint
@@lutomson3496 it was a test flight
@@lutomson3496 and poor cleanup crew needed to unstick the captain from the windscreen 😂
The brakes on modern planes have to be strong enough to stop a fully loaded plane from takeoff velocity *with* the engines still at full forward thrust. See the video on the 777's rejected takeoff test on YT.
“Hold your applause until the aircraft has come to a complete stop”. 😬
atleast taxi speed keep an eye on where the plane touched down as well💀💀
@@big_man_ank1768 well close enough
Exactly. You’re still sitting on top of 2 flames and a couple thousand tons of kerosene
that a330 neo landing was butter
The grass is coming up in rectangular shapes, they clearly just laid sod down not thinking of this issue. The runway was unaffected (less sod debris).
But people don't click on "grass near runway is damaged by plane" as much as "plane destroys the runway"!
I'm thinking they probably had to have the runway swept before the next take off, could be costly for the next airline otherwise.
That’s exactly what I thought!! More importantly, it was SUPER EXCITING IT WAS MY AIRPORT & such a great of the Minneapolis skyline.
They did just lay down the sod. And I had no idea that I had done that.
That’s why you don’t clap
Lol hold the clapping til you are at the gate
Or just don’t clap. Imagine if someone clapped every time you just did your job
@@rileyfitzsimons8875 lol
🧐🤨
@@rileyfitzsimons8875 It boosts my ego, I like it.
That 747 incident was apparently at Minneapolis St Paul (KMSP) runway 17 which is 147ft (44.8m) wide which is pretty standard and about the minimum a 747 can operate from.
It is at Minneapolis, the video says
@@veronicafleitas412 technically the airport is at Fort Snelling, and physically closer to St. Paul than Minneapolis
And unlike the title implies, the runway is not in any way destroyed.
"Destroys The Runway" overdramatic much OP? Good lord. It blew away what looks like freshly laid sod. 🙄
@@deltalou8987 It did. They had just laid new sod around the runway, and now have to lay it all over again.
1:03 Must have been one of those massive dragonflies :P
I captured that video 😌 It was a bird strike actually.
@@Aakarsh350 he was joking 🙄
@@mark675 yeah I got that 😂 but that Dragon fly was huge too🤣 Even I was scared of that
@@Aakarsh350 Great video!
First I looked at the crow flying nearby, then the engine strike, then the dragon fly 😂
The first video was a departure off of runway 17 at KMSP this past Sunday. The runway was previously shut down for a while - not entirely sure why (I didn't read the NOTAM), but apparently some grass was laid around the runway following the completion of the work. Typically from what I've seen, heavy departures are done on 12R/30L because it's the longest runway that they usually have in service, with the occasional A330 departure from 17, but I've never seen a 747 on it! Either way, the new grass didn't like the high trust takeoff the 747 used! I noticed today that MSP now has a NOTAM stating "MSP RUNWAY 17/35 CLOSED TO FOUR ENGINE AIRCRAFT"
Probably wasn't from the engines, they still wouldn't be hanging over the edge of the paved section, but an example of how powerful the wing vortices can be.
Thank you for that!
Runway 17 is almost exclusively for 757-200 or smaller. That 747 must have been nearly empty. Runway 17 is only about 8000 ft long.
@@Jimorian Or just the sheer amount of air pushed downward by the wings in order to produce lift.
@@jp7585 There are many airports, such as Rotterdam Holland, that have runways less than 8000 ft that regularly take 747s. MSP Runway 17 was built from the start to meet all standards for Design Group V, which includes the 747. Jumbos, especially those from the west cargo area, do often use 17 for takeoff if they're only carrying a medium size load. As others have written, this wasn't a case of operating a plane on a marginal runway ...It was just a matter of fresh sod not having been given time to settle and root.
Nice to see a flight out of MSP. As a kid in college I used to love having lunch parked by the old barracks and watching Northwest 747s & DC9s take off.
I love spotting 💗
My first granddaughter was born in July. My daughter knows I adore planes and kept threatening to name her DC9 😅
She ended up naming her...Piper ❤❤❤
Close enough. She won't change her middle name to Cub, though. 😣
My dad is a Gopher! Chem Engineering in late 60s.
"aaah bordstrike, bordstrike"!! -Indian man
Thats me😂😂
@@Aakarsh350 Happy Bordday!
@@iviewthetube i said Bird strike 🥱 listen carefully
@@Aakarsh350 Ha, ha. I appreciate your sense of humor.
@@iviewthetube 😵💫😵💫
Turned that landscape into Minecraft reality
Like the short landings. Dropped into San Diego tonight and pilot missed the mark, had to get on thrusters and brakes really hard. Always fun landing here.
Dropped into is definitely the correct descriptive terminology for landing in San Diego.
I expect in the first clip, there was newly laid sod adjacent to the runway. Sod takes a few weeks to knit into the soil. It can always be laid back down. Green side up this time, boys!
When the 747's were new in the early 1970's it was quite commonplace to see them ploughing furrows into the earth on take-offs.
an airbus a380 can do the same thing though🤣
@@raven4k998 the a380 wasn’t introduced until 40 years later so that’s irrelevant lol
We had a 747 land at Grissom AFB IN. When it taxied off the parking spot, the ramp behind it was lifted right out of the ground. It was a 20 foot square chunk of concrete a couple of feet thick. Since the 747 would be routinely parked there, we had to rebuild that section of the ramp.
Looks like even the mass of concrete had to succumb to aerodynamics 😂
Couldn't help but laugh when they clapped whilst still going at hundreds of miles per hour
Clapping while the plane is drifting off the runway was pretty funny
If you are approaching at a certain angle and your tail passengers can see the incoming tarmac, i’d say that to be cause for a quick regret clap. At least they’re not turning on their phones.
The airplane doesn’t do “hundreds” of miles per hour when landing. 🤪
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 whats typical vRef for landing of a A320 - isn't it around 130-140 Kts? that's what....... 150-160 ish in MPH?
@@CapStar362 I imagine around that for the A320. Probably more like 125 to 135 when light. It’s what the B737 does and even the B747. It’s been a few years for the 74, but I recall 124 KTS for landing.
What is that in MPH? Probably around 150, right?
U made me look it up. 🤣. 124 KTS is 142.6 MPH.
Moral of the Astana story: Don't release your seatbelt until the aircraft comes to a complete stop... and neither do clap.
As I'm just a passenger of planes, not a pilot....do the training simulators that Pilots use put them in situations where they have to negotiate cross winds?...and if so how severe are the testing wind patterns? I only ask out of curiosity after seeing that Astana Airbus A320 literally coming in almost sideways for a landing @ 1:53! That was some serious flying technique from the cockpit crew! Cheers From The Clouds In Ohio
The answer is "yes" for crosswind sim training. There are also numeric limits on acceptable cross or tail winds for each aircraft.
@@jimmiller5600 Appreciate the feedback Jim! I figured there was "some" training on crosswinds and the like but wasn't sure how far the teaching part could go in a simulator compared to actually flying in those gusts of wind. The power to just toss those behemoths around is really incredible. Salute!
I´m a private pilot. Every pilot start to learn to land in crosswinds since they start flying small planes. Crosswinds are a part of flying. Actually, the technique used to land in crosswind in small planes is not that different to the one used in airliners.
@@TheStuport The kicker is that airline pilots have over 1,500 hours (approx) of experience before starting at a regional airliner as a co-pilot. After another thousand or two more hours and promotion to Captain they move up to the mainlines as a Co-pilot again. That's 2,500 to 3,500 hours in total, with the first 1,500 generally in piston aircraft which are light in both weight (stability) and thrust.
@@fastica Thanks so much for commenting on this Federico! It helps connect the dots for a cleared picture of what training is all about for pilots...private and commercial! Ciao From Ohio
Many years ago, around 1973, the USAF was converting a 747 into the E-4A airborne command post. The contractor was located at a municipal airport. Although many jet aircraft used the runway previously, when the E-4A took off those huge engines peeled off parts of the runway pavement. The once on line video is no longer available unfortunately.
My Dad flew the E-4. E-4B at that time. Stationed at Offutt.
And Kelsey gets his moment on 3 minutes!
Fresh grass chunks..... let's get into it.
My thoughts exactly - lol!!!
Freshly laid sod.....coming up!
My name's Kelsey, I'm a 747 pilot, and my channel, 74Gear, is all about gardening.
2:14 hard landing but thats about the best outcome that could have happened thankfully. hope there were no injuries
Guy : birdstrike!! birdstrike!!!
Pilot : Quiet please, I know.
I am that guy😂💎
Nice avatar!! But now I want a nice Chianti! 🍷
Nothing more beautiful than a 747 takeoff.
Thanks again for another wonderful video 3MoA!
1:11 indische Version mit Ökoterroristen umzugehen^^
Clapped too early on that last one 🤪😂😂😂
The 747....
My favourite airplane of all time💖
Excellent video!😸
Noooooo! Kelsey creating content?
Glad I'm not the only one thinking that 😂
Hahahahaha!
Wow, that plane was all the way off the runway in the grass and the pilot managed to bring it back. Give that man a raise! Or let him be the chief instructor for passenger playing top gun School. 🇺🇲👍🏻👀
That pilot made a major mistake : He accepted to land with way to much of a crosswind. He should have aborted that landing and DEMAND to be directed to another runway more in line with the prevailing wind.
The air controller was negligent by directing the landing to that runway, and the pilot reckless to accept and proceed with that uselessly dangerous landing.
You made one grave error. You forgot that youtube is full of people who (think they) know everything about everything and fucking LOVE to remind the world.
Current MSP NOTAM regarding RWY 17 (the one with the ripped up sod):
MSP 10/368 MSP RWY 17/35 CLSD TO FOUR ENGINE ACFT 2210261747-2211302300
Now that's what I call putting the power to the ground!
Clap clap clap clap 'Yayyy ... uh oh'
Luckily no one was injured while watching this video.
Great video! Amazing content!
I just don't know about that last landing in the video. Extreme crab angle to port. Manages to land, but wind is so fierce it weathervanes the airplane into it, thereby causing the excursion to port?
I mean, I'm not the greatest armchair pilot, but seems this is why they have alternates...
Edit, for posterity and stuff: a) I have a directional dillema in my brain, when I say or type the left-right thing in question, whether it be left/right, east/west, or in this case, port/starboard (which I am being told quite vociferously in the replies is wrong, so my bad, won't happen again) and even Empty/Full if the gauge is oriented that way, I'll often without even noticing get it backwards. I absolutely meant starbo...er, right. Stupid brain. It's irritating and still goin' on years later and I have no idea why. Probably some kind of childhood trauma when trying to give directions... :p
So both my faux pas are now explained, and sorry for the mess. *flips coin to barkeep*
PORT?
@@fallguy747 Ha! Right? Nautical term, and yet still incorrect. Right is starboard.
We don’t use port or starboard.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 the proper way to say it would be "the bow of the ship plowed to the starboard side and then the parking anchor was dropped"
@@Bren39 sounds about right.🤣🤣
Just the sheer weight and size of the queen of the skies tears up the runway as she soars higher into the heavens
Let’s just appreciate that butter landing
Channel: 3 Minutes of Aviation
Video: 2:51 Am I A Joke To You
For the A330, I kept thinking GOOD GOD reverse thrust! Glad it was just a test! 😁
If they’d have stopped any quicker I’d expect to see the pilots get tossed through the windshield. Jk. I’d be more concerned about the condition/wear of the brakes. Obviously it was a test so hopefully they were looked over
Atlas: Hey airport, SOD OFF!
Boeing fan due to local economy.... That Airbus max breaking was REALLY impressive!
Being an American & saying something positive about Airbus is treasonous. Boeing All the away!!! Airbus=❤️ for Commie comrade
@@Mrs.Doubtfire007 Airbus is British... Right? Really I should be a supporter of McDonald Douglas and TWA but...
@@Skarry Airbus has a production plant in Britain, but Britain only holds a minor share in Airbus. In legal terms the civil aircraft division of Airbus is French, while the Airbus Group is Dutch. But in effect the governments of France Germany and Spain own most of the shares.
And a small detail about supporting local economy: A A320 built in Alabama has more american work going into it than a Boeing 787 ;)
Awsome! Thanks for sharing.
At 2:18 it once more proves that you should not clap (if at all 😉) bevor the plane has come to a complete still stand.
Nice video!!
2:18 they clapped too soon...
"you may have heard the engines making a strange noise just now. please rest assured that everything is fine, and we will continue with our flight as planned. the attendants will be along shortly to serve you your in-flight meal, which tonight is roast chicken"
Extra servings & extra fresh tonight, folks!!!
The last video of plane going off runway..
if I were on that flight, would be last one off, so other people wouldn't see my "messy" pants!
😅🤣😂
cheers for the pilot controlling that excursion. sounds like signals/lighting might've gotten a bit bent. good vid
yo this set of clips were insane this time around
And that is why you should NOT clap after landing. Don't clap at all during the flight ;-)
Atlas Air paint is the best
1:10 it was a bird. on my 60" tv i could see a tiny speck get sucked into the engine.
The 747is a trip. We were doing crew training at the old Minot AFB in Montana and it snowed like hell and we used it as a snow blower cleaned off the whole ramp clean as a whistle.
Except that Minot is in N Dakota, not Montana. Has been since 1957.
Everyone: Claps
Air Astana pilot: And I took that personally
During the same time the crew did a low pass, 50' agl and that was one of the most awesome things I ever expierenced. You could feel the pressure wave coming off the airplane.
I said left!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣
AHHHH Budslight Budslight!
1:07 Is that massive dragonfly using ACAS, or it just a show off?
That moment when you already clap, when you are not even close to lower speeds
2:18 Klatschen sie ruhig, meine Damen und Herren, klatschen sie ruhig! 😂
the a320 landing was butter
The power of the queen of the skies
How is that runway destroyed?
well, if you have a hairdryer and a stack of cards your be able to blow those away, same principle only much bigger hairdryer
@@ray076NL I know, but whats flying looks like dirt from the surrounding ground, not asphalt from the runway/pieces from the lighting... that's why im confused by the tittle.
@@solarius14 could be concrete of slabs of gras.
EXACTLY!!! FAKE NEWS!!!
Lindo vídeo 👏👏👍
2:21 When you celebreate to early!
End Vidoe be like: Thank you for flying Ryanair i Hope you have a good holiday
That Atlas tearing up the shoulder reminds me of a Taco Bell burrito going through my digestive system.
At my age, life goes by fast enough. . . these don't help. Fastest 3 minutes always.
2:18 never celebrate too early
"Yes, flight attendant? I'd like to take my clapping back please?"
Great...thanks!!
Lucky that sod didn't get sucked INTO the engine 😮
*Liked the guy on the cellphone recording the vid saying "Om Imma locka-a pasta"*
The 747 taking off from MSP wasnt on a narrow runway. it has been used by NW and DL 747s for decades.
EXACTLY!!! We launched the the -400 for crying out loud!!!
Pilot: “ah shit landing clappers? Well, guess we gotta follow protocol..”
Impressive stop
Love from China!
The applauding in the last video stopped uncomfortably…😂
2:21 when you want to get to the gate the fast way in Microsoft flight simulator
The Atlas airline livery is so gorgeous ! Is it a freight company or a charter one ?
2:32 This can happen during those "smooth landings" that people love to see. Taking your time before touchdown = less runway to slow down. Ryanair knows better.
thank you
When I read 747 destroys runway, I thought it would... I witnessed a REAL runway being destroyed during an airshow at Daytona Beach in the mid 80s by a Marine Harrier! It was hovering over the west end of the main runway - which had just been repaved. Suddenly chunks of asphalt blew into the air! There was concern by the Marines that the Harrier was struck, but the only damage was to the newly paved runway.
The runway remained open but shortened. The airlines had to land several flights in Orlando and bus pax to Daytona until they adjusted their loads for the shortened runway.
No video exists but I was a reporter for the ERAU newspaper and was taken out to see the damage and got photos... Long since lost...
1:06 Got to give a shout out to that big ass Dragonfly.
Aircraft cat to be checked before dispatching aircraft in an airport cat ( runway width …)
Boeing narrow runway operations is a good book also.
2:19 Never celebrate too early.
Might have been a bit premature with the applause. 😎
fantastic Queen of the skies
Even tho the pilot veered off the runway massive kudos for him to commit to the landing. Must have been extremely difficult
No runway destroyed!
I wish your videos were longer!
The Queen of the Skies does what she wants, when she wants!
A bird strike is definitely 'no damage' - the engine will need to be inspected.
Do you film these clips yourself and your collaborators from around the world, or do you take them from the Internet?
In the comments, there is a link to submit videos. These videos are around the world, not possible for one person to film them all. Probably knows quite a few people to record stuff just in case, and send the videos their way as well for us all to enjoy.
@@Vortechtral thank you kitty
Look in the description, the channel links to every video's original link when available.
@@ChristopherBurtraw if you go to most of the videos by original link, you will find "3 Minutes of Aviation" And a comment similar to -
3 Minutes of Aviation
6 days ago
Stunning captures! May I feature a part of this video in one of my next episodes? Of course with a link back to your original video. Cheers!
Eurofilms - Planes & Aviation
6 days ago
Yes of course
^ ^ At least 3 Minutes - ASKS to use the videos unlike a dozen other channels just pulls them and the owner finds out and gets into a email war about it.
@@CapStar362 yep, asking and giving credit, two reasons I support this channel for sure!
Dude sends out his pigeons in the morning, sets up his camera and waits
1:30 the coherent 150 kt motion of all the atoms in the airplane is converted into 2,000 mph random motion of atoms in the brake pads (assuming steel, carbon would be faster).
its a very complex composite material. It offers much more braking power than any car brake material.
@@MrSchwabentier well the velocity goes as 1/sqrt(mass) of atom/molecule at fixed T. Radiated heat goes as T**4, so double the temp, and get 16x the radiation.
anything on the korean air incident the other day?
You should make a video about korean air flight KE631 that overran the runway in Mactan Cebu airport