This camera still rocks in 2021. I bought one, it felt down by my fault and the screen ribbon was defective :-( but I like this camera so much that I bought another one and sold the other one on ebay for repair. I really hope the person who bought it can save his life.
Interestingly, the On-Off switch is an ancient design, almost identical to the original Olympus OM-.1 (and similar to the OM-2 also). I think it was intended to give the retro look and echo those great film cameras.
I think the problem with your sideway shift is that you're recording in 25p. If you're gonna pan a lot, i think it's no brainer to use 60p. I think the same issue often happens in action cam, thats why people opt for action cam that can do 60p because they pan a lot. They also eliminate the jumping sequence because of the pixel binning, which makes it much smoother.
+neti neti I don't find it uncomfortable to reach as long as you are holing the camera with both hands. If you use the right hand only, you can loose some grip when you press it.
First visual impressions on buying one- solid beautiful and very good quality. One small criticism is the grip or lack of. And as it's fairly weighty, i put my finger underneath to compensate and the edge is too sharp. So therefor I will look at a good half case and hope this helps
Hi, I am thinking about buying this camera on black friday for myself. It seems like a great option for me. But you mentioned in the video that sony and ? can't remember have a few better cameras? do you mean better at the same price point? or better and in a higher price bracket? I would be interested in them if they are around the same price point.
+Melissa Labadie I can't remember mentioning Sony in the video. I mention the old E-M10 that is still on the market and more affordable for users on a tight budget. The E-M10 II is an excellent choice to start with m4/3 and gets some nice features from both the E-M1 and E-M5 II. The only Sony alternative would be the a6000: better sensor and AF but lacks some interesting things such as the 5-axis stabilisation. The EVF is also better on the E-M10 II.
+dhnnylil G80 if you also want excellent 4K video, mic input and other interesting video settings. X-T10 for its lovely colors, E-M10 II for its 5-axis stabilization, small size and extra features. The G80 is the most complete as it has 5-axis stabilization and tons of extra features too.
Does the EM10 Mark II outputs CLEAN HDMI? I'm going to use it mostly for video so it matter for me. Unfortunately, all reviews are photo oriented so this spec is kind of left out. Thank you for answering sir!
is this any good for action sport. ? i have a sony hx300 bridge camera, its good but takes ages to ready for next pic, worse when using multi fps. . ? i dont want to go slr. . i like the compact omd with proper eye viewfinder
+pmay222 it works ok in good light and with slow or medium fast subjects (runner for example). If you need to shoot indoor in less light, it will struggle more.
Just got the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II. One of the things I noticed is a very noticeable lag/jerk when using the EVF. I tried a couple of different lenses (the 14-42 kit lens and 45mm prime) and they both do this. The jerking/lagging goes away when I switch to the Simulated Optical Viewfinder. I'm wondering if this is an issue with the camera in general that may be fixed with some future firmware update or if its a specific defect that requires exchanging the camera, as the jerk/lag is very annoying when using the EVF. Did you notice this when you were using the EVF?
+Peter Schulman I didn't notice any particular jerk/lag with my sample. I tried all the different settings concerning the EVF and find it to be excellent, not excessive time lag and not other relevant issues.
+Peter Schulman I have the same EVF jerk problem; occurs in high constrast lighting or low light. Did you ever resolve the problem; I'm wondering is it a hardware problem or an issue with this camera?
When you make adjustments to the aperture or shutter speed and ISO does this show on the screen and viewfinder how it will look when Ive taken the photo?
Would it be wise to buy the mark I if it’s my first camera? And will I still be able to take similar long exposures with the mark I as compared with the mark ii? Thanks great video by the way
The mark I is a good camera, if you find it at a good price go for it. The stabilisation is not as good as the mark II (3 axis vs 5 axis) but you have the same long exposure features.
Would you put the video quality of the G7 above the Sony RX100M3? That is the current camera that I am using, however I have to return it to a friend in the upcoming weeks. I'm shooting 1080p for the most part so that is my focus.
+Frost Tech I haven't compare the side by side. The RX100 M3 is a stunning compact camera but the G7 has definitely some advantage on the IQ department (larger sensor). Also you can add more lenses later on or use the 4k capabilities of the camera.
Hi Mathieu, was wondering whats the difference between the 14-42mm EZ and the ii R lens? Do you think it's a must buy, or would you recommend to go for a prime lens like the 17mm/25mm? Hope to hear from you soon! :)
+Justine Q the main difference is that the EZ version has an electronic zoom (you can choose between three zoom speeds in the menu). It is also more compact when powered off. The 17mm prime is definitely superior concerning the optical quality. A zoom lens is alway more versatile but If you like prime lenses, the 17mm works really well.
+Justine Q personally I prefer the field of view of the 17mm. With the 25mm I often wish for something wider especially when travelling or in the streets. With the 25mm however it is easier to take environmental portraits (useful if you have a family and kids you want to photograph).
Hi Mathieu! Great review indeed! Just a question, if you had to choose between this one and Panasonic G7, which one would you stick with? I have an Canon 400D for almost 8 years now and I need an upgrade :) I'm into portrait and travel photography mainly. Thank you for your help!
+cellolover98 the original E-M10 has the same image quality (same sensor). The E-M10 II has a better stabilisation system, better EVF and some extra features like focus bracketing for example. But if you want to save some money, the original E-M10 is still a great camera.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) thank you. I will shop around, since I have a Nikon DSLR, I might also wait next year to see if either EM5 ii or 10ii can come down further in price.
Thank you for the straighforward informative review. Quick question, how's the focus peaking for video? Feel free to comment on how it compares to the peaking on E- m1 after updated firmware. Thanks again
+Jeff Waweru After the E-M1's firmware the performance is very similar. I like the option to decrease the brightness of the image so that you can see the outlines better. Overall I think that it is effective and helpful plus the EVF on the E-M10 II is very nice.
Looking into purchasing this camera, but want to know if I can comfortably use the lens (the M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm II R) that comes with it instead of needing to purchase another one right away. What lenses were used in this video? What do you recommend? Thank you in advance!
The 14-42mm is a decent kit lens to start with. But if later on you want superior sharpness or more subject separation (more shallow depth of field), then you will need to invest in other lenses with faster apertures.
You can use Olympus and Panasonic micro four thirds lenses, plus any other lens that has a m4/3 mount (Samyang, Voigltander, Sigma have some products).
Hi Matthieu, I am trying to buy a small camera, I don’t know which one to buy between Sony a6000 and the Olympus m10 Mark II. I’ll mainly be using it to blog (food and style). Which one do you think gives a better photo quality and better colours? Thank you.
I bought 2 in 2018. Like them but one has issues with after market flash units. The size reminds me of my Nikon FM3a. Was surprised that most of the electronics as the SAME as in the new digital Pen.
Hi Mathieu! Thanks for the awesome video, very complete and informatice! I'm about to buy one of these, but i can choose between two offers, one with the 14-42 II R and the other with the 14-42 EZ pancake like the one you use in the video. What do you think about the EZ quality and power zoom? Especially on the power zoom i have some doubts as i would prefer a manual operated zoom..what's your opinion on that? Thanks and keep it up!!
The power zoom is not that bad and you can set three different speeds in the menu. Th EX version has the obvious advantage of being more compact, otherwise go with the one that is the cheapest ;-)
Thanks a lot for the video Mathieu. I am relatively new in photography. Considering buying either this M10 Mark ii, Lumix G7 or Sony A6000. In my opinion, a6000 is getting old. G7 looks nice but very video-focused. M10 Mark ii seems like a good option. What do you think ?
If you are not interested in video, the E-M10 II is an optimal choice: nice design, good EVF, excellent 5-axis stabilisation and vast choice of lenses to use.
+Alex Myara the E-M10 II is basically the same as the E-M5 II except the lack of weather sealing and high res shot. The LCD screen doesn't flip on the side (just tilting) and the EVF is slightly smaller. So would say yes, go for the E-M10 II.
Hey How is the a6000 as compared to the M10 II ? I'm an advanced amateur considering a holistic camera that could be a nice dslr replacement. Does the bigger sensor on the a6000 make that much of a difference? Is the lens stabilization enough or should I opt for the M10 II? Appreciate the detailed review :)
The a6000 has slightly more dynamic range but the difference is not huge. Not all Sony lenses have optical stabilisation so it depends on which one you get. The lens choice is also more limited in comparison to micro four thirds. With the E-M1 II, you get stabilisation with any lenses you want.
I'm not going to be looking at buying a lot of lenses. Considering that I buy the basic bundle that has lenses around 16-50 and 55-200mm for both cameras, which one do you think is a better bet for an overall better camera. Which one would you pick (as a better dslr replacement)? This is the most confusing purchase decision I've experienced in a while. Thanks for helping me out.
I would personally go with the E-M10 II. I prefer its design and ease of use in comparison to the a6000. However the Sony camera can be find with crazy deals sometimes, so go with the one that cost less ;)
Do you think it makes sense to buy older em5? I am new to photography and dont want to spend so much money on a new camera so I am looking for a second hand one. As the em5 is weather sealed it would be a benefit for me as I will shoot when travelling.
The old E-M5 is still a fine camera but many things have improved with the newer models (buttons, dials, EVF, AF, high ISO etc). However if you find it for a very good deal, I would say go for it.
If you were on a budget vs not on a budget, and had to choose 1 lens for landscape/travel photography for this camera which one would be? I was looking at the 25mm 1.8 but I'd like to have the zoom option as well. ( PS: im not impressed by the kit lens sharpness/) thanks
+Alpine.Trails 12-40mm Pro if you’re not on a budget (you may also need the optional grip). On a budget, there’s the Lumix G 12-60mm f3.5-5.6 which is better than your kit lens.
How is low light performance? I'm looking for a camera I can take on my trip to Italy, so I'll be shooting indoors and in the woods when I'm home. I have it down to between the OM-D E-M10 (mark I or II) or the Sony A6000.
Concerning IQ at high ISO, the a6000 has a slight advantage but the E-M10 II has great sensor stabilisation that allows you to use slower shutter speeds in low light and keep your ISO low (unless you are shooting people and you need a faster shutter speed). You also have a better selection of lenses for the E-M10 II from Olympus and Panasonic. The a6000 has a faster AF especially in continuous mode.
+Rod Clarke the E-M1 has a better grip/ergonomics, is completely weather sealed and has faster continuous shooting inC-AF which makes it more suitable for sports. If you don't need any of these features, go with the E-M10 II ;)
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) Thanks for the quick reply. I think the weather proofing may be handy as I want to take more pictures in the snow. What about video?
Mark ii ou mark iii ? Plutôt tenté daller vers le ii pour le boîtier métal . Le ii n'a pas la 4k mais je me demande si j'en aurais l'utilité et si la différence est très notable , je ne connais pas trop ce domaine . Le iii possède les dernières technologies il y a des comparatifs qui expliquent toutes les différences sur le net entre ii et iii . Mais malgré ces " améliorations je pense quand même aller vers le ii pour son boîtier en métal , pour le fait qu'il soit plus compact, poignée plus fine avec la possibilité d'y ajouter un grip plus large , qui n'est pas possible sur le 3 car la poignée est plus épaisse et olympus n'a pas prévu pour l'instant dy ajouter une poignée optionnelle . Le ii est en métal et est pourtant plus léger de 20g et plus compact , donc voilà pour l'instant mon choix est le 2 , à moins que quelqu'un me donne son avis et m'explique pourquoi je devrais prendre le iii 🙂
Hi Mathieu (I'n now using the NikonD90) I want to buy a smaller camera which can take both good pictures and videos, so after researches I'm in between Canon g7 mark ii, Olympus OM D EM mark ii and Olympus OM D EM 10 (this last one more for the lower price). G7 and Olympus mark ii look similar for some features but different for others. Which would you recommend (mostly for portraits and daily use)? (I don't need 4K, most important is a good price/quality) THANK YOU
So are you hesitating between the G7 and E-M10 mark II? The G7 is better for video even if you use it in Full HD. It has better ergonomics and is straight forward to use. The E-M10 II has a lovely design and has 5-axis stabilisation. Image quality for stills is similar.
Thank you very much for answering! Yes i was wondering also if the g7x is as good as the Olympus for photos (I want to use for video as well but photography is still my priority) or whether I should choose the g7 just if my first use will be video and the Olympus if first use will be photos?
I like the GX7 a lot. It's an old model now but it has great ergonomics and the IQ is very similar to the G7 and E-M10 II. The IBIS is not as good as the E-M10 though, but if you find it for a low price, it certainly worth to consider.
The G85 has a better grip (more comfortable with larger lenses), is weather sealed and has better video capabilities and options (4K, mic input, etc). If you are not interested in video, then the E-M1 II is an interesting choice: nice design, comfortable to use, compact. Both have good IQ and excellent image stabilisation.
Im glad you mentioned this as I had an EM1 sitting in a shopping cart. They have just dropped the price in Australia which probably means they are trying to clear old stock. So are you going to wait.
This or the GX85? I mostly shoot street, portrait, and some video (not really interested about 4k). Also, how about low light performance, which is better?
+HowDoen image quality is very similar including low light performances. Video is better on the GX80. The E-M10 II has a better viewfinder and the optional landscape grip can enhance the ergonomics. Otherwise I would say go with the best deal you can find ;)
+Marie Kristiansen the E-M10 II is smaller and you have the advantage of the 5-axis stabilisation. The G7 has a better grip because it is sligthly larger and has better video quality (+ 4k video). What kind of things you are planning to shoot mainly?
I am going on a 3-week trip to China this summer, so I think mostly pictures and videos of the city (Shangai, Beijing etc.) and the landscapes (Guillin). But I think I most will be shooting videos and photos of cities I visit. Btw awesome video, and thanks for your response!
just purchased this cam and love it. its so weird for me to use auto setting and get perfect pictures even at night. although i dont like using auto. i have to try and get the A setting down for night shots without a tripod. is it possible?
The E-M10 II: great stabilisation, nice body design and several compact and fast lenses at an affordable price. The X-T10 has good ergonomics, very nice colour profiles and slightly better dynamic range. One of the kit lens (18-55 f2.8-4) is one of the best kit lens you can find.
The E-M10 II has a few advantages like in-body stabilisation (5-axis), a compact body and smaller lenses so if you look for the best portability it is a good choice. The X-T10 has a slightly faster AF (especially in C-AF) and excellent colours via the picture profiles (film simulation mode). Fuji lenses are excellent but you have more choice with the micro four thirds system (including cheap prime lens like the Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 or the Olympus 45mm f/1.8).
The E-M5 II is weather sealed, as sligthly more controls on the body, a sligthly larger viewfinder, some extra functions like the high Res Shot and a more advanced 5-axis stabilisation system that is also compatible with Sync IS (if you intend to use the 300mm Pro or the new 12-100mm f/4). If you don't need any of the features mentioned above, the E-M10 II will give you the same IQ.
Thank you for your response..I think I may go for the 5..the more advanced IS..and my daughter has the 5 mark 11..so we could learn a few things together I thought of last night..Thanks so much fr taking the time to reply.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) how is the kit lens? Of what do you recommend. I want it mostly for an every day carry camera with a good lens that can work for various occasions.
+Jose Rosas the kit lens is not great and personally I don't like the electronic zoom. The 12-50mm is a better kit lens and has better macro capabilities. If you want higher quality, it is either the 12-35mm 2.8 (Panasonic) or the 12-40mm 2.8 (Olympus). Or a few primes that are compact and with excellent IQ. There are also a couple of all-purpose zoom lenses if you like more versatility.
The E-M10 II has a better EVF, better stabilisation (5-axis vs 3 axis), better C-AF performance and more robust buttons and dials. IQ is basically the same and the original E-M10 remains a very good camera and that price is definitely attractive.
The a6000 gives you better image quality and has a faster autofocus, but the E-M10 II is nicer to use, has excellent 5-axis stabilisation and you'll find more lenses in the micro four thirds system.
The a6000 and X-T10 have a better AF but no in-body stabilisation. Their APS-C sensors will give you something more in terms of dynamic range (but not a lot). The X-T10 has very nice colours. The E-M10 II is more compact (as the lenses) and the 5-axis stabilisation is a big plus. It also depends for what use you are considering these cameras. The lens selection is important too. Micro four thirds has the most complete offering, Fuji lenses are excellent but the Sony has a less interesting selection.
Thank you for your precious advice! I'm looking for the best camera in terms of nature, landscape and street and high image quality. I was looking at the EM-10 Mark II! Am i wrong?
The E-M10 II can do very well. In terms of IQ the a6000 or the X-T10 can give you something more (larger sensor) but again the E-M10 II has a more compact system and some advantages like IBIS. I would say go for the E-M10 II if you want something smaller (also thinking about the lenses) or the X-T10 if you want slightly better IQ.
Why does my camera go out of focus if I move toward a subject. I start at about 3 feet for the video and when i get to about 18 inches is is out of focus. But if I take a still image at 18 inches it is in focus. Ideas?
Which lens are you using? It could be that the camera struggles to maintain focus in video mode while getting near the minimum focus distance capabilities of the lens.
How does it fair against the em5 ii? Especially when it comes to video? Does it have a flat profile like the em5 ii does? And is the body too small, like some people have complained? If it's smaller than say the em5 ii or a panasonic camera then it's going to be a problem for me :/
The flat profile is only on the E-M5 II. It is sligthly smaller than the E-M5 II, but the latter is weather sealed and more robust. Video quality is very similar.
Salut, j'ai vu un commentaire en fr et à l'accent j'ai un peut reconnu donc j'en profite comme je suis au top en anglais, j'ai actuellement un canon 70d avec un 18-35 de chez sigma et un 50mm, je cherche quelques chose de plus léger et compact quand je part en vacances ou sur des soirées, ce que je veux conservé c'est surtout le RAW, le viseur, la possibilité de changer d'optique et un bon placement au niveau du tarif, j'aimerai aussi un piqué correct, pas digne d'un 5d mark III avec une optique L, mais au moins d'un 70d avec un objo de kit. Je pense que ce olympus rentre parfaitement dans mes critère, peux-tu me confirmé ? As-tu des exemple en haute def de photo prise avec le kit de base de ce olympus ? Merci beaucoup pour ton retour !! Et bonne continuation.
+Julien Huiban je pense que le E-M10 II est un très bon choix. Le boitier est vraiment plus petit et léger par rapport au 70d donc tu sentiras vraiment la différence. La qualité du RAW est très bonne également. Dans mon test de l'appareil tu peux trouver également un lien vers un comparatif ISO haute def: www.mirrorlessons.com/2015/08/25/olympus-om-d-e-m10-mark-ii-review/
E-M10 II has in-body 5-axis stabilisation and is more compact . G7 has a better grip, 4K video and mic input. I would choose E-M10 II if you shoot stills primarily or the G7 if you are interested in video more.
The a6000 has a slight advantage concerning IQ at high ISO and dynamic range. It has a faster AF especially in continuous mode. The E-M10 II has great sensor stabilisation that allows you to use slower shutter speeds in low light and keep your ISO low (unless you are shooting people and you need a faster shutter speed). You also have a better selection of lenses from Olympus and Panasonic for the E-M10 II.
Hi, when i change aperture, ISO or even time, I dont see these changes on screen. Dooesnt it have that option? How to turn on real time view to see settings changes??
You need to turn the Live View Boost off in the Menu (Custom Settings, section D if I remember correctly). Also check that you don't have the S-OVF option turned on.
S-OVF is a setting on your camera that makes the EVF behave like an optical viewfinder. If it is turned on, you won't see a real time exposure preview.
+Zachary Locks It has many improvements concerning the EVF, button layout and dials. The 5-axis stabilisation and video recording options are better and performance at high ISO are also better with more colour accuracy. The original E-M5 has the advantage of being weather sealed.
I'm looking at getting a OMD camera. Would you recommend the EM10 mkii over the original EM5 then? I'm getting it as a 2nd camera for travel and everyday pics. I have a nice full frame dslr for serious work.
Bonjour Mathieu, je tente en français, je me demandais si le coût supérieur entre le OMD EM10 et Em10 mark ii était justifié. je possède un Nikon D7100 et je souhaite acheter un hybride pour voyage léger et j'hésite entre les deux. Merci.
+Bruno Mari le E-M10 première version à mon avis reste une excellente caméra et se trouve à un meilleur prix. Le E-M10 mark II a plusieurs améliorations (stabilisation du capteur, viseur, mode vidéo) mais la qualité d'image est la même. Donc si vous préférez dépenser moins, n'hésitez pas avec le E-M10.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) Merci pour cette réponse rapide. Je constate que chez les vendeurs où je me fournis régulièrement l'EM10 commence déjà à être remplacé par le mark 2.
damn im planning to buy this camera.. its affordable and looks like it really good. im a dslr user that is kind of annoyed by bulkiness. i do like hanging out in dingy places will this camera be ok for that?
man i love you for your replies. thank you very much. i mean im not sure if im an 'entry level' but this will basically do what a dslr does. which is nice i hope! thanks again thank thanks!
+Mike Vines but I bet there will be some excellent deals going on in a few months about the E-M10. Otherwise it will make less sense and as you say, the difference in cost won't be that big.
***** I reply for Kurt but I will say same thing to you. I want to buy Mark II. For me is perfect - smaller than M5, gain 5-axis stabilisation and better wheels on the top. BUT when I saw photos I thought my senses are wrong because photos from this camera looks bad. No so sharp and with bad colors. So I compared both versions (10 and 10II) and I was right. M10II SUCK on image quality. Photos are blurred with bad color reproduction. It's not my opinion, just choose www.dpreview.com/articles/4887393042/bang-for-the-buck-olympus-om-d-e-m10-ii-review/8 both cameras on studio on dpreview.com and check, f.e., cards on the left bottom corner. And you see nightmare from M10II. It looks beautiful, it has got many nice features, but in two most important things it sucks so much. Time from off to shoot photo and, it is the most important, PHOTO QUALITY. I don't know what's going on, Olympus.
+Pablo Picasso I took some side by side comparison shots with both E-M10 cameras and I honestly didn't find any relevant difference. Dpreview also says that the E-M10 II struggle with moving subject, well I found the exact opposite. I used it at a sport event and easily managed to catch some insects shots with the 60mm macro.
the current trend seems to be for manufacturers to incrementally add features to cameras every year or so, rather than bring out something that is new and ground breaking. This is fine if you don't own the previous model but must hack off people who bought the previous model less than a year ago.
johnny durham I understand what you say but I think this is how the digital imaging goes nowadays. Other brands actually did worst in the past. But let's see what Olympus will bring next with the E-M1 successor (hopefully) ;)
+Quintin Pardew the a6000 is one of the best bang for the buck right now. However with the Olympus camera you have a better selection of lenses so it depends on what you want to do.
the a5100 has more megapixel and is larger, so it will give you something more when it comes to high ISO and dynamic range. So if it's image quality you want to prioritise, go with the Sony. The E-M10 II is nicer to use, has a viewfinder and excellent 5-axis stabilisation.
just sold my olympus pen epl 6 camera. anyone got any suggestions for camera upgrade? i love the epl 6 but i wonder if i should try fuji or sony? or should just stick with the omd em10? thanks in advance!
Hi Mathieu, i've seen a few of your reviews and i like the fact that you are impartial on them, so i would like to hear your advice about getting a Sony a6000 or the Olympus EM10 Mark II, thanks in advance! PD: the sony is about 100USD cheaper right now with a 16-50mm len against the 14-42mm len for Olympus
The a6000 has sligthly more dynamic range because of the larger sensor and the AF is very fast if you need to shoot moving subjects/action/sports. Video quality is a little bit better. The E-M10 II in-body stabilisation, lots of extra features (time-lapse, live composite, etc) and a larger choice of lenses.
+muchomochi I haven't tested the D5500 so I can't really answer you. The E-M10 II definitely has some advantage: more compact, 5-axis stabilisation just to name a few.
Mathieu Gasquet ok, I'm kind of slow, but better quality and video. So do you mean it has better image quality and video? I know that the 4k video destroys the OMD 10 ii, but for photography still quality. and would you ever do a video comparion? thank you for a reply, I didn't think you would.
+Jackson Peyton it's not weather sealed but it won't mind a few drops of snow or shooting at -2/3°C. However if the conditions are more extreme it could be a problem. So it depends on how are the snowy wet environments where you live :)
Sorry to badger you but im deciding between the OM-D E-M10 and a lumix GH-3 for shooting lots of video, what do you think is best? If you arent familiar with the GH-3 then its ok.
Lumix GH3 is better overall. Stronger and high quality video codec, lots of options for video shooting, multi angle screen etc, less problems with moirè and aliasing. The only thing the E-M10 II does better is the stabilization.
the E-M10 II has a better EVF (larger and with no "rainbow effect"). I also prefer the color rendition when using OOC JPGs. The GX80 has a faster AF (not a huge difference but it's there), more advanced touch screen capabilities and a more user-friendly interface and menu system.
Instagram: instagram.com/mirrorlessons/
Facebook: facebook.com/mirrorlessons/
Twitter: twitter.com/MirrorLessons
$299 right now. Even in 4/2020 during the Coronavirus I'm still gonna get it!
@Fazo Capoo it's good enough if you get proper lens. It's an amazing camera
I ordered one too! My first serious camera.
I’ve Been trying to sell my mark I foreverrrr
This camera still rocks in 2021. I bought one, it felt down by my fault and the screen ribbon was defective :-( but I like this camera so much that I bought another one and sold the other one on ebay for repair. I really hope the person who bought it can save his life.
Agreed. I still used mine with prime lenses and 12-45 pro zoom lens. You don't need anything more if you're not professional. ;)
Interestingly, the On-Off switch is an ancient design, almost identical to the original Olympus OM-.1 (and similar to the OM-2 also). I think it was intended to give the retro look and echo those great film cameras.
I think the problem with your sideway shift is that you're recording in 25p. If you're gonna pan a lot, i think it's no brainer to use 60p. I think the same issue often happens in action cam, thats why people opt for action cam that can do 60p because they pan a lot. They also eliminate the jumping sequence because of the pixel binning, which makes it much smoother.
ok thanks for the input, I love how much you interact with your Audience
+Jackson Peyton Thanks, glad to be of help ;)
Heyy. Should I buy gx85 or omd e10 mark 2 . there is a 130 dollars difference only for the 4k video. Need suggestion .
im in the same position
If: 4K is important
Then: buy the other product
If: 4K is _not_ important
Then: do not buy the other product
Simple.
+neti neti I don't find it uncomfortable to reach as long as you are holing the camera with both hands. If you use the right hand only, you can loose some grip when you press it.
Hi, I have only just discovered you. I thought your review of this Olympus camera was very good. Thank you. Ray
+Ray Lynch Thanks!
Very good video.
I thought I had watched 15 minute's worth of information when it was only halfway!
That was a wonderful review of this camera model. Thank you 😊
I would have said that focus bracketing is big new feature to OM-D (E-330 - E-520 had it) and coming to E-M1 (and focus Stacking too).
First visual impressions on buying one- solid beautiful and very good quality. One small criticism is the grip or lack of. And as it's fairly weighty, i put my finger underneath to compensate and the edge is too sharp. So therefor I will look at a good half case and hope this helps
The Olympus ECG‑3 grip is also a nice solution.
Hi, I am thinking about buying this camera on black friday for myself. It seems like a great option for me. But you mentioned in the video that sony and ? can't remember have a few better cameras? do you mean better at the same price point? or better and in a higher price bracket? I would be interested in them if they are around the same price point.
+Melissa Labadie I can't remember mentioning Sony in the video. I mention the old E-M10 that is still on the market and more affordable for users on a tight budget. The E-M10 II is an excellent choice to start with m4/3 and gets some nice features from both the E-M1 and E-M5 II. The only Sony alternative would be the a6000: better sensor and AF but lacks some interesting things such as the 5-axis stabilisation. The EVF is also better on the E-M10 II.
Nicely done and comprehensive review. Thanks for posting this.
the video on my omd 10ii is shaky and has jello effect,I can not shoot handheld. Which settings should I use for perfect handheld video.
You reckon Olympus E-M10 mark II or Fuji XT-10 or Lumix G80? Thanks :)
dhnnylil I'm at the same decision... haha.
+dhnnylil G80 if you also want excellent 4K video, mic input and other interesting video settings.
X-T10 for its lovely colors,
E-M10 II for its 5-axis stabilization, small size and extra features.
The G80 is the most complete as it has 5-axis stabilization and tons of extra features too.
Thanks Matt. Very Helpful, maybe we should wait for the next gen of XT-10 so it would get the image stabilization.
GX8 ;)
Does the EM10 Mark II outputs CLEAN HDMI? I'm going to use it mostly for video so it matter for me. Unfortunately, all reviews are photo oriented so this spec is kind of left out.
Thank you for answering sir!
is this any good for action sport. ? i have a sony hx300 bridge camera, its good but takes ages to ready for next pic, worse when using multi fps. . ? i dont want to go slr. . i like the compact omd with proper eye viewfinder
+pmay222 it works ok in good light and with slow or medium fast subjects (runner for example). If you need to shoot indoor in less light, it will struggle more.
I have the OM-D E-M10 but I don't understand why there is only 30fps video and no 25fps
Just got the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II. One of the things I noticed is a very noticeable lag/jerk when using the EVF. I tried a couple of different lenses (the 14-42 kit lens and 45mm prime) and they both do this. The jerking/lagging goes away when I switch to the Simulated Optical Viewfinder. I'm wondering if this is an issue with the camera in general that may be fixed with some future firmware update or if its a specific defect that requires exchanging the camera, as the jerk/lag is very annoying when using the EVF. Did you notice this when you were using the EVF?
+Peter Schulman I didn't notice any particular jerk/lag with my sample. I tried all the different settings concerning the EVF and find it to be excellent, not excessive time lag and not other relevant issues.
+Peter Schulman I have the same EVF jerk problem; occurs in high constrast lighting or low light.
Did you ever resolve the problem; I'm wondering is it a hardware problem or an issue with this camera?
When you make adjustments to the aperture or shutter speed and ISO does this show on the screen and viewfinder how it will look when Ive taken the photo?
Would it be wise to buy the mark I if it’s my first camera? And will I still be able to take similar long exposures with the mark I as compared with the mark ii? Thanks great video by the way
The mark I is a good camera, if you find it at a good price go for it. The stabilisation is not as good as the mark II (3 axis vs 5 axis) but you have the same long exposure features.
What Cameras would you say this competes with from a video perspective? What alternatives would you recommend in the sub $900 range for video only?
+Frost Tech Panasonic G7 without any doubts. Great video capabilities and cost even less than $900.
Would you put the video quality of the G7 above the Sony RX100M3? That is the current camera that I am using, however I have to return it to a friend in the upcoming weeks. I'm shooting 1080p for the most part so that is my focus.
+Frost Tech I haven't compare the side by side. The RX100 M3 is a stunning compact camera but the G7 has definitely some advantage on the IQ department (larger sensor). Also you can add more lenses later on or use the 4k capabilities of the camera.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) of course the RX100M3 has the advantage of being very small and pocketable.
Thanks a lot for the review. What do you think better for video Sony a6000 or this Olympus. Thanks again!
I would say a6000, better high ISO performance and more dynamic range.
Mathieu, thanks for your attention.
Hi Mathieu, was wondering whats the difference between the 14-42mm EZ and the ii R lens? Do you think it's a must buy, or would you recommend to go for a prime lens like the 17mm/25mm? Hope to hear from you soon! :)
+Justine Q the main difference is that the EZ version has an electronic zoom (you can choose between three zoom speeds in the menu). It is also more compact when powered off. The 17mm prime is definitely superior concerning the optical quality. A zoom lens is alway more versatile but If you like prime lenses, the 17mm works really well.
thanks for you reply :) another question, which prime lens do u think i should get for a starter? 17/25mm? :D
+Justine Q personally I prefer the field of view of the 17mm. With the 25mm I often wish for something wider especially when travelling or in the streets. With the 25mm however it is easier to take environmental portraits (useful if you have a family and kids you want to photograph).
Hi Mathieu! Great review indeed! Just a question, if you had to choose between this one and Panasonic G7, which one would you stick with? I have an Canon 400D for almost 8 years now and I need an upgrade :) I'm into portrait and travel photography mainly. Thank you for your help!
+António Ventura if you don't need 4K video I would go with the E-M10 II.
Possible to have "gaincontrol" over the sound ? I.e for concerts and control of the soundlevel...
as of today, the original om10 with a kit lens costs about $500 vs $800 fot mark 2 with a similar kit lens. which one should I get?
+cellolover98 the original E-M10 has the same image quality (same sensor). The E-M10 II has a better stabilisation system, better EVF and some extra features like focus bracketing for example. But if you want to save some money, the original E-M10 is still a great camera.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) thank you. I will shop around, since I have a Nikon DSLR, I might also wait next year to see if either EM5 ii or 10ii can come down further in price.
Thank you for the straighforward informative review. Quick question, how's the focus peaking for video? Feel free to comment on how it compares to the peaking on E- m1 after updated firmware. Thanks again
+Jeff Waweru After the E-M1's firmware the performance is very similar. I like the option to decrease the brightness of the image so that you can see the outlines better. Overall I think that it is effective and helpful plus the EVF on the E-M10 II is very nice.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) cheers! and does the battery door allow for a dummy battery coupler for external battery?
+Jeff Waweru I can't remember but I don't think so.
Can i ask, between sony a6000 and olympus em10 which you prefer
Looking into purchasing this camera, but want to know if I can comfortably use the lens (the M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm II R) that comes with it instead of needing to purchase another one right away. What lenses were used in this video? What do you recommend? Thank you in advance!
The 14-42mm is a decent kit lens to start with. But if later on you want superior sharpness or more subject separation (more shallow depth of field), then you will need to invest in other lenses with faster apertures.
Another great review and some more images/video in and around Twywn - what's not to like ? Many thanks.
+Bob Brick ;)
what video editing software do you use? thanks a lot.
+Marco Cabahit Adobe Premiere Pro.
Thanks bro!
Can you put lenses of multiple brands on the Em-10?
You can use Olympus and Panasonic micro four thirds lenses, plus any other lens that has a m4/3 mount (Samyang, Voigltander, Sigma have some products).
Okay, Thanks!!
Hi Matthieu, I am trying to buy a small camera, I don’t know which one to buy between Sony a6000 and the Olympus m10 Mark II. I’ll mainly be using it to blog (food and style). Which one do you think gives a better photo quality and better colours? Thank you.
Personally I would choose the E-M10 II: nice in body stabilisation which can help you in keeping the ISO down, more lenses to choose, more fun to use.
Great! Thank you very much!
I bought 2 in 2018. Like them but one has issues with after market flash units. The size reminds me of my Nikon FM3a. Was surprised that most of the electronics as the SAME as in the new digital Pen.
Hi Mathieu! Thanks for the awesome video, very complete and informatice! I'm about to buy one of these, but i can choose between two offers, one with the 14-42 II R and the other with the 14-42 EZ pancake like the one you use in the video. What do you think about the EZ quality and power zoom? Especially on the power zoom i have some doubts as i would prefer a manual operated zoom..what's your opinion on that? Thanks and keep it up!!
The power zoom is not that bad and you can set three different speeds in the menu. Th EX version has the obvious advantage of being more compact, otherwise go with the one that is the cheapest ;-)
Thanks a lot for the video Mathieu. I am relatively new in photography. Considering buying either this M10 Mark ii, Lumix G7 or Sony A6000.
In my opinion, a6000 is getting old. G7 looks nice but very video-focused. M10 Mark ii seems like a good option. What do you think ?
If you are not interested in video, the E-M10 II is an optimal choice: nice design, good EVF, excellent 5-axis stabilisation and vast choice of lenses to use.
Would you say I should buy this new or get a used e-m5 Mark ii for the same price. I don't need the weather sealing
+Alex Myara the E-M10 II is basically the same as the E-M5 II except the lack of weather sealing and high res shot. The LCD screen doesn't flip on the side (just tilting) and the EVF is slightly smaller. So would say yes, go for the E-M10 II.
I want to buy my first camera (I’m complete beginner) Sony a6000 or this?
Hey
How is the a6000 as compared to the M10 II ?
I'm an advanced amateur considering a holistic camera that could be a nice dslr replacement.
Does the bigger sensor on the a6000 make that much of a difference?
Is the lens stabilization enough or should I opt for the M10 II?
Appreciate the detailed review :)
The a6000 has slightly more dynamic range but the difference is not huge.
Not all Sony lenses have optical stabilisation so it depends on which one you get. The lens choice is also more limited in comparison to micro four thirds.
With the E-M1 II, you get stabilisation with any lenses you want.
I'm not going to be looking at buying a lot of lenses.
Considering that I buy the basic bundle that has lenses around 16-50 and 55-200mm for both cameras, which one do you think is a better bet for an overall better camera. Which one would you pick (as a better dslr replacement)?
This is the most confusing purchase decision I've experienced in a while. Thanks for helping me out.
I would personally go with the E-M10 II. I prefer its design and ease of use in comparison to the a6000. However the Sony camera can be find with crazy deals sometimes, so go with the one that cost less ;)
Going with the EM 10 II.
Thanks for the help :)
Do you think it makes sense to buy older em5? I am new to photography and dont want to spend so much money on a new camera so I am looking for a second hand one. As the em5 is weather sealed it would be a benefit for me as I will shoot when travelling.
The old E-M5 is still a fine camera but many things have improved with the newer models (buttons, dials, EVF, AF, high ISO etc). However if you find it for a very good deal, I would say go for it.
If you were on a budget vs not on a budget, and had to choose 1 lens for landscape/travel photography for this camera which one would be? I was looking at the 25mm 1.8 but I'd like to have the zoom option as well. ( PS: im not impressed by the kit lens sharpness/) thanks
+Alpine.Trails 12-40mm Pro if you’re not on a budget (you may also need the optional grip). On a budget, there’s the Lumix G 12-60mm f3.5-5.6 which is better than your kit lens.
Thank you. I was afraid you might mention the 12/40 which sadly is over my budget for now. I will definitely have a look at the 12/60. Cheers.
How is low light performance? I'm looking for a camera I can take on my trip to Italy, so I'll be shooting indoors and in the woods when I'm home. I have it down to between the OM-D E-M10 (mark I or II) or the Sony A6000.
Concerning IQ at high ISO, the a6000 has a slight advantage but the E-M10 II has great sensor stabilisation that allows you to use slower shutter speeds in low light and keep your ISO low (unless you are shooting people and you need a faster shutter speed). You also have a better selection of lenses for the E-M10 II from Olympus and Panasonic.
The a6000 has a faster AF especially in continuous mode.
Hi, thanks for a great review. What would you recommend. The EM 10 mark 11 or the EM1?
+Rod Clarke the E-M1 has a better grip/ergonomics, is completely weather sealed and has faster continuous shooting inC-AF which makes it more suitable for sports. If you don't need any of these features, go with the E-M10 II ;)
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) Thanks for the quick reply. I think the weather proofing may be handy as I want to take more pictures in the snow. What about video?
+Rod Clarke the E-M10 II is better but the E-M1 should receive a firmware update soon that will also improve its video specs.
I think its different world if we compare em 1 and em 10 🤔😂 (cmiiw)
Mark ii ou mark iii ? Plutôt tenté daller vers le ii pour le boîtier métal . Le ii n'a pas la 4k mais je me demande si j'en aurais l'utilité et si la différence est très notable , je ne connais pas trop ce domaine . Le iii possède les dernières technologies il y a des comparatifs qui expliquent toutes les différences sur le net entre ii et iii . Mais malgré ces " améliorations je pense quand même aller vers le ii pour son boîtier en métal , pour le fait qu'il soit plus compact, poignée plus fine avec la possibilité d'y ajouter un grip plus large , qui n'est pas possible sur le 3 car la poignée est plus épaisse et olympus n'a pas prévu pour l'instant dy ajouter une poignée optionnelle . Le ii est en métal et est pourtant plus léger de 20g et plus compact , donc voilà pour l'instant mon choix est le 2 , à moins que quelqu'un me donne son avis et m'explique pourquoi je devrais prendre le iii 🙂
Hi Mathieu
(I'n now using the NikonD90) I want to buy a smaller camera which can take both good pictures and videos, so after researches I'm in between Canon g7 mark ii, Olympus OM D EM mark ii and Olympus OM D EM 10 (this last one more for the lower price). G7 and Olympus mark ii look similar for some features but different for others.
Which would you recommend (mostly for portraits and daily use)?
(I don't need 4K, most important is a good price/quality)
THANK YOU
So are you hesitating between the G7 and E-M10 mark II?
The G7 is better for video even if you use it in Full HD. It has better ergonomics and is straight forward to use.
The E-M10 II has a lovely design and has 5-axis stabilisation. Image quality for stills is similar.
Thank you very much for answering!
Yes i was wondering also if the g7x is as good as the Olympus for photos (I want to use for video as well but photography is still my priority) or whether I should choose the g7 just if my first use will be video and the Olympus if first use will be photos?
I like the GX7 a lot. It's an old model now but it has great ergonomics and the IQ is very similar to the G7 and E-M10 II. The IBIS is not as good as the E-M10 though, but if you find it for a low price, it certainly worth to consider.
Hi Mathieu, would you go for em10 ii or panasonic g85?
The G85 has a better grip (more comfortable with larger lenses), is weather sealed and has better video capabilities and options (4K, mic input, etc). If you are not interested in video, then the E-M1 II is an interesting choice: nice design, comfortable to use, compact. Both have good IQ and excellent image stabilisation.
Best mirrorless camera for photography being the primary use (video is not an issue for me) at this price point? Great review by the way!
It's certainly is one of the best choice you can find, especially if video is not a concern.
Great thanks so much. I think the E-M1 might be the way to go.
+Robbie Keith Is that when the new EM1 is flagged to be realised?
+Rod Clarke Thats a problem. I would like to buy an EM1 now to take traveling. I may have to wait.
Im glad you mentioned this as I had an EM1 sitting in a shopping cart. They have just dropped the price in Australia which probably means they are trying to clear old stock. So are you going to wait.
This or the GX85? I mostly shoot street, portrait, and some video (not really interested about 4k). Also, how about low light performance, which is better?
+HowDoen image quality is very similar including low light performances. Video is better on the GX80. The E-M10 II has a better viewfinder and the optional landscape grip can enhance the ergonomics. Otherwise I would say go with the best deal you can find ;)
Hi, may I know which camera will you suggest omd em 10 ii or omd em 10 iii?
if you want 4K video, go with the new E-M10 III, otherwise the E-M10 II should get some interesting deals price wise now.
Would you recommend this over The Panasonic lumix g7? Because i am buying one of these, i just dont know which to choose?
+Marie Kristiansen the E-M10 II is smaller and you have the advantage of the 5-axis stabilisation. The G7 has a better grip because it is sligthly larger and has better video quality (+ 4k video). What kind of things you are planning to shoot mainly?
I am going on a 3-week trip to China this summer, so I think mostly pictures and videos of the city (Shangai, Beijing etc.) and the landscapes (Guillin). But I think I most will be shooting videos and photos of cities I visit. Btw awesome video, and thanks for your response!
did they make it so when you close the battery door it locks automatically?
+Callum Chisholm no you still have to close it manually with the switch.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) that's to bad
just purchased this cam and love it. its so weird for me to use auto setting and get perfect pictures even at night. although i dont like using auto. i have to try and get the A setting down for night shots without a tripod. is it possible?
+pat ski or manuel. they look dark which is expected but would like to have my own colors using A or M
+pat ski the internal stabilisation is pretty good so you can get sharp results without a tripod with slow shutter speeds such as 1/5 or 1/2s.
Hi, Can you help me? Fujifilm xt-10 or Olympus om-d e-m10 mark ii. which one should I choose?
The E-M10 II: great stabilisation, nice body design and several compact and fast lenses at an affordable price.
The X-T10 has good ergonomics, very nice colour profiles and slightly better dynamic range. One of the kit lens (18-55 f2.8-4) is one of the best kit lens you can find.
Mathieu Gasquet thank you so much
If i would have to choose between this one and fujifilm X-10, which one would you advise?
The E-M10 II has a few advantages like in-body stabilisation (5-axis), a compact body and smaller lenses so if you look for the best portability it is a good choice.
The X-T10 has a slightly faster AF (especially in C-AF) and excellent colours via the picture profiles (film simulation mode).
Fuji lenses are excellent but you have more choice with the micro four thirds system (including cheap prime lens like the Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 or the Olympus 45mm f/1.8).
Would you recommed this one or the 5 mark 11?
The E-M5 II is weather sealed, as sligthly more controls on the body, a sligthly larger viewfinder, some extra functions like the high Res Shot and a more advanced 5-axis stabilisation system that is also compatible with Sync IS (if you intend to use the 300mm Pro or the new 12-100mm f/4).
If you don't need any of the features mentioned above, the E-M10 II will give you the same IQ.
Thank you for your response..I think I may go for the 5..the more advanced IS..and my daughter has the 5 mark 11..so we could learn a few things together I thought of last night..Thanks so much fr taking the time to reply.
Mathieu, em10 ii or g7?
+muttyhc G7 is you want better video quality and 4k capabilities (4k photo is also interesting). Otherwise, go with the E-M10 II.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) thanks, video isn't a priority. 4k photo looks good for fast moving kids but is em10 ii fast enough to keep up?
+muttyhc yes it does very well with the AF.
I have a canon 70D and want a hand held mirrorless camera for easier traveling. Would this be a good camera to use?
+Jose Rosas It certainly will. Very compact and you can find many small lenses as well, so a perfect companion for traveling light.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) how is the kit lens? Of what do you recommend. I want it mostly for an every day carry camera with a good lens that can work for various occasions.
+Jose Rosas the kit lens is not great and personally I don't like the electronic zoom. The 12-50mm is a better kit lens and has better macro capabilities. If you want higher quality, it is either the 12-35mm 2.8 (Panasonic) or the 12-40mm 2.8 (Olympus). Or a few primes that are compact and with excellent IQ. There are also a couple of all-purpose zoom lenses if you like more versatility.
+Jose Rosas yeah I feel a prime lens would be better for me. So the way these lenses work with the camera is you multiply them by 2 right?
Yes, a 12mm is the equivalent of 24mm on a full frame camera.
hey do you think the upgrade is crutial? I can buy a slightly used em10 mk1 for 350eutos with pancake 14-42
The E-M10 II has a better EVF, better stabilisation (5-axis vs 3 axis), better C-AF performance and more robust buttons and dials. IQ is basically the same and the original E-M10 remains a very good camera and that price is definitely attractive.
Hi! Which of the two would you recommend, this or the sony a6000? Thanks!
The a6000 gives you better image quality and has a faster autofocus, but the E-M10 II is nicer to use, has excellent 5-axis stabilisation and you'll find more lenses in the micro four thirds system.
Mathieu Gasquet thank you for this input. I'll go for em10 II for my very first mirrorless.
Question do all Olympus cameras have the same lens mount?
Yes for all the micro four thirds cameras (OM-D and Pen series). Olympus used to produce 4/3 DSLRs but they are now discontinued.
Should i prefer this one or the A6000 or the Xt-10?
The a6000 and X-T10 have a better AF but no in-body stabilisation. Their APS-C sensors will give you something more in terms of dynamic range (but not a lot). The X-T10 has very nice colours. The E-M10 II is more compact (as the lenses) and the 5-axis stabilisation is a big plus. It also depends for what use you are considering these cameras. The lens selection is important too. Micro four thirds has the most complete offering, Fuji lenses are excellent but the Sony has a less interesting selection.
Thank you for your precious advice! I'm looking for the best camera in terms of nature, landscape and street and high image quality. I was looking at the EM-10 Mark II! Am i wrong?
The E-M10 II can do very well. In terms of IQ the a6000 or the X-T10 can give you something more (larger sensor) but again the E-M10 II has a more compact system and some advantages like IBIS.
I would say go for the E-M10 II if you want something smaller (also thinking about the lenses) or the X-T10 if you want slightly better IQ.
Thank you so much! Again and again!
How did you make that timelapse? Is there a setting on the camera?
Yes there is a dedicated timelapse function.
Why does my camera go out of focus if I move toward a subject. I start at about 3 feet for the video and when i get to about 18 inches is is out of focus. But if I take a still image at 18 inches it is in focus.
Ideas?
Which lens are you using? It could be that the camera struggles to maintain focus in video mode while getting near the minimum focus distance capabilities of the lens.
@@MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons hello I am using the standard original lens
How does it fair against the em5 ii? Especially when it comes to video? Does it have a flat profile like the em5 ii does? And is the body too small, like some people have complained? If it's smaller than say the em5 ii or a panasonic camera then it's going to be a problem for me :/
The flat profile is only on the E-M5 II. It is sligthly smaller than the E-M5 II, but the latter is weather sealed and more robust.
Video quality is very similar.
Salut, j'ai vu un commentaire en fr et à l'accent j'ai un peut reconnu donc j'en profite comme je suis au top en anglais, j'ai actuellement un canon 70d avec un 18-35 de chez sigma et un 50mm, je cherche quelques chose de plus léger et compact quand je part en vacances ou sur des soirées, ce que je veux conservé c'est surtout le RAW, le viseur, la possibilité de changer d'optique et un bon placement au niveau du tarif, j'aimerai aussi un piqué correct, pas digne d'un 5d mark III avec une optique L, mais au moins d'un 70d avec un objo de kit. Je pense que ce olympus rentre parfaitement dans mes critère, peux-tu me confirmé ? As-tu des exemple en haute def de photo prise avec le kit de base de ce olympus ? Merci beaucoup pour ton retour !! Et bonne continuation.
+Julien Huiban je pense que le E-M10 II est un très bon choix. Le boitier est vraiment plus petit et léger par rapport au 70d donc tu sentiras vraiment la différence. La qualité du RAW est très bonne également. Dans mon test de l'appareil tu peux trouver également un lien vers un comparatif ISO haute def: www.mirrorlessons.com/2015/08/25/olympus-om-d-e-m10-mark-ii-review/
olympus omd em10 mk2 vs panasonic lumix g7
Which will win?
thank you!
E-M10 II has in-body 5-axis stabilisation and is more compact .
G7 has a better grip, 4K video and mic input.
I would choose E-M10 II if you shoot stills primarily or the G7 if you are interested in video more.
Hi! This is so informative but is this excellent when it comes to street/landscape photography? Thanks!
Yes it does well for street and landscape too.
Great video and great explanation! I just bought this camera and I was wondering what's the object you clipped at the camera at 2:43 ? Thank you!
It's a grip extender (Olympus ECG-3)
Hello! Does anyone know how to turn off the screen when the camera is in photo mode in order to save battery?
hi, i would like to ask, which one better a6000 or this olympus OM-D E-M10 MK II?
The a6000 has a slight advantage concerning IQ at high ISO and dynamic range. It has a faster AF especially in continuous mode.
The E-M10 II has great sensor stabilisation that allows you to use slower shutter speeds in low light and keep your ISO low (unless you are shooting people and you need a faster shutter speed). You also have a better selection of lenses from Olympus and Panasonic for the E-M10 II.
Hi, when i change aperture, ISO or even time, I dont see these changes on screen. Dooesnt it have that option? How to turn on real time view to see settings changes??
You need to turn the Live View Boost off in the Menu (Custom Settings, section D if I remember correctly). Also check that you don't have the S-OVF option turned on.
Ovf ? Whats this?
S-OVF is a setting on your camera that makes the EVF behave like an optical viewfinder. If it is turned on, you won't see a real time exposure preview.
Thank You ! :)
how does this camera compare to the original em5?
+Zachary Locks It has many improvements concerning the EVF, button layout and dials. The 5-axis stabilisation and video recording options are better and performance at high ISO are also better with more colour accuracy. The original E-M5 has the advantage of being weather sealed.
I'm looking at getting a OMD camera. Would you recommend the EM10 mkii over the original EM5 then? I'm getting it as a 2nd camera for travel and everyday pics. I have a nice full frame dslr for serious work.
+Zachary Locks yes I would definitely recommend the E-M10 II.
Thanks Mathieu!
Bonjour Mathieu, je tente en français, je me demandais si le coût supérieur entre le OMD EM10 et Em10 mark ii était justifié. je possède un Nikon D7100 et je souhaite acheter un hybride pour voyage léger et j'hésite entre les deux. Merci.
+Bruno Mari le E-M10 première version à mon avis reste une excellente caméra et se trouve à un meilleur prix. Le E-M10 mark II a plusieurs améliorations (stabilisation du capteur, viseur, mode vidéo) mais la qualité d'image est la même. Donc si vous préférez dépenser moins, n'hésitez pas avec le E-M10.
+Mathieu Gasquet (MirrorLessons) Merci pour cette réponse rapide. Je constate que chez les vendeurs où je me fournis régulièrement l'EM10 commence déjà à être remplacé par le mark 2.
+Bruno Mari Olympus m'a dit que le E-M10 reste dans le marché pour le moment, probablement il est plus facile de le trouver sur internet.
damn im planning to buy this camera.. its affordable and looks like it really good. im a dslr user that is kind of annoyed by bulkiness. i do like hanging out in dingy places will this camera be ok for that?
+pat ski yes it should be fine for dingy places unless they are really humid.
man i love you for your replies. thank you very much. i mean im not sure if im an 'entry level' but this will basically do what a dslr does. which is nice i hope! thanks again thank thanks!
Do you think it is worth selling my EM-10 to get the EM-10II?
Taichi Kato No, I would rather advice a switch to an E-M5 II or an E-M1, but if you are happy with your E-M10, there is no need to change it ;)
+Mike Vines but I bet there will be some excellent deals going on in a few months about the E-M10. Otherwise it will make less sense and as you say, the difference in cost won't be that big.
***** I reply for Kurt but I will say same thing to you. I want to buy Mark II. For me is perfect - smaller than M5, gain 5-axis stabilisation and better wheels on the top.
BUT when I saw photos I thought my senses are wrong because photos from this camera looks bad. No so sharp and with bad colors. So I compared both versions (10 and 10II) and I was right.
M10II SUCK on image quality. Photos are blurred with bad color reproduction. It's not my opinion, just choose
www.dpreview.com/articles/4887393042/bang-for-the-buck-olympus-om-d-e-m10-ii-review/8 both cameras on studio on dpreview.com and check, f.e., cards on the left bottom corner. And you see nightmare from M10II.
It looks beautiful, it has got many nice features, but in two most important things it sucks so much. Time from off to shoot photo and, it is the most important, PHOTO QUALITY.
I don't know what's going on, Olympus.
+Pablo Picasso I took some side by side comparison shots with both E-M10 cameras and I honestly didn't find any relevant difference. Dpreview also says that the E-M10 II struggle with moving subject, well I found the exact opposite. I used it at a sport event and easily managed to catch some insects shots with the 60mm macro.
Really mate?
zapodaj.net/images/b2750aecadd1f.jpg
So what, these images are the same?
Very good video. Thank you.
Surprised to see my local town of Aberystwyth. Hope you enjoyed your visit to West Wales.
the current trend seems to be for manufacturers to incrementally add features to cameras every year or so, rather than bring out something that is new and ground breaking. This is fine if you don't own the previous model but must hack off people who bought the previous model less than a year ago.
johnny durham I understand what you say but I think this is how the digital imaging goes nowadays. Other brands actually did worst in the past. But let's see what Olympus will bring next with the E-M1 successor (hopefully) ;)
g7 vs lx10 vs omd em10 mk2?
Do you think this or the Sony a6000 are better?
+Quintin Pardew the a6000 is one of the best bang for the buck right now. However with the Olympus camera you have a better selection of lenses so it depends on what you want to do.
How much does 16mp censor differ from 24mp censor.?which one is better sony a5100 or this?
the a5100 has more megapixel and is larger, so it will give you something more when it comes to high ISO and dynamic range. So if it's image quality you want to prioritise, go with the Sony.
The E-M10 II is nicer to use, has a viewfinder and excellent 5-axis stabilisation.
just sold my olympus pen epl 6 camera. anyone got any suggestions for camera upgrade? i love the epl 6 but i wonder if i should try fuji or sony? or should just stick with the omd em10? thanks in advance!
Can the fn1 button be set to do back button focusing?
Thank you for the video.
+Michael Sullivan I don't think it is possible. You can use it for AFL or AF stop but not for focusing.
My friend is selling me this camera for 450 CAD , thinking of buying it . what do u think?
Sounds like a reasonable price, the camera is great and still a good camera to buy today.
Good thorough review, thanks
Hi Mathieu, i've seen a few of your reviews and i like the fact that you are impartial on them, so i would like to hear your advice about getting a Sony a6000 or the Olympus EM10 Mark II, thanks in advance!
PD: the sony is about 100USD cheaper right now with a 16-50mm len against the 14-42mm len for Olympus
The a6000 has sligthly more dynamic range because of the larger sensor and the AF is very fast if you need to shoot moving subjects/action/sports. Video quality is a little bit better.
The E-M10 II in-body stabilisation, lots of extra features (time-lapse, live composite, etc) and a larger choice of lenses.
would you say this or the nikon D5500?
+muchomochi I haven't tested the D5500 so I can't really answer you. The E-M10 II definitely has some advantage: more compact, 5-axis stabilisation just to name a few.
G7 vs OMD 10? which one? with everything that is included, build quality, image quality ect! someone please help!
Do you care about video? If so, the G7 has better quality and 4K.
Mathieu Gasquet ok, I'm kind of slow, but better quality and video. So do you mean it has better image quality and video? I know that the 4k video destroys the OMD 10 ii, but for photography still quality. and would you ever do a video comparion? thank you for a reply, I didn't think you would.
Many thanks for a very informative video, very helpful.
This or regular omd em10
is 200 the lowest ISO?
It is the lowest native ISO but you also have the Low extended setting which corresponds to ISO 100.
has omd em10 mark i got the electronic shutter for silence mode ?
No, if I remember correctly, it doesn't.
thank you
do think its a bad idea to take a camera like this to shoot video in snowy wet environments?
+Jackson Peyton it's not weather sealed but it won't mind a few drops of snow or shooting at -2/3°C. However if the conditions are more extreme it could be a problem. So it depends on how are the snowy wet environments where you live :)
Sorry to badger you but im deciding between the OM-D E-M10 and a lumix GH-3 for shooting lots of video, what do you think is best? If you arent familiar with the GH-3 then its ok.
Lumix GH3 is better overall. Stronger and high quality video codec, lots of options for video shooting, multi angle screen etc, less problems with moirè and aliasing. The only thing the E-M10 II does better is the stabilization.
Thank you for the review. Very good.
great reviews on here. I look to buy this E-M10 II or the new Lumix gx80. 4K on the Lumix aside, any advise on which to choose will be great. thanks!
the E-M10 II has a better EVF (larger and with no "rainbow effect"). I also prefer the color rendition when using OOC JPGs. The GX80 has a faster AF (not a huge difference but it's there), more advanced touch screen capabilities and a more user-friendly interface and menu system.
Thanks so much for this informative video, I learned a lot about this camera which I just ordered.
song name at the beginning ?
+Cat Chewer from the Logo Intro? It's from Apple Garage Band