Airgun Calibers .177 or .22 Which one to choose?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лип 2024
  • Airgun Calibers .177 or .22 Which one to choose?
    You want to purchase a new pellet rifle or pistol but your not sure which caliber to purchase?
    In this video I talk about the pros and cons of each caliber to help you make a better decision when your making your next pellet gun purchase.
    Here's a link for a great deal on OLIGHT Flashlights.
    olight.idevaffiliate.com/idev....
    Video links:
    Crosman 1377 Chrony Test: • Crosman 1377 Pellet Pi...
    Crosman 1322 Chrony Test: • Crosman 1322 Chony Test
    Benjamin Discovery .22 Cal : • Benjamin Discovery .22...
    RWS 850 Air Rifle Review: • RWS / Hammerli 850 Air...
    To get daily updates on the Wingman115 Channel follow along on my social media pages.
    Facebook Page
    / wingman115
    Twitter Page:
    / wingman115crew
    Instagram:
    / wingman115
    Google Plus:
    plus.google.com/u/0/+wingman1...
    Amazon Store Link:
    astore.amazon.com/wingman115-20
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @Wingman115
    @Wingman115  4 роки тому +7

    Check out our follow up video. Pellets vs Slugs. ua-cam.com/video/rcH5y903rJI/v-deo.html

    • @ordyhorizonrivieredunord712
      @ordyhorizonrivieredunord712 4 роки тому

      I love air guns, I use mine to shoot essential oil compound that desinfect the air in stinky rooms or corridor. it pulverises it and it smells good...

  • @terrancewilhite9260
    @terrancewilhite9260 4 роки тому +33

    I am 71 years old so I was brought up that the .177 was the only "real" airgun. I use a 1377 in my living room where i have a 12 ft range so I don't even have to stand up to shoot. If I were to go out hunting with a pistol I would absolutely use the 1322 instead, I want to get one anyway.

    • @peterbaugh51
      @peterbaugh51 2 роки тому

      If you hunt, .177 is best for lower power, cheap accurate guns like 1377. How do I know this.

    • @JohnDoe-dj6qw
      @JohnDoe-dj6qw Місяць тому

      Explain what a "real" airgun is.

  • @Oldsparkey
    @Oldsparkey 6 років тому +117

    Follow the old rule........ 22 for fur .... 177 for feathers. Best option is one of both.

    • @damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830
      @damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830 5 років тому +4

      Aint a mousebor rat easier to penetrate that bunch of feathers? Never shot a bird but shot a mouse with 177. And pellet passed though it. Wasn't instant death obviously but shots besides headshots rarely are. Unless you use a real gun because then there's nothing left of it.

    • @leonardjenkins8968
      @leonardjenkins8968 4 роки тому +4

      Cool. I had never heard that one. Sounds good to me

    • @savage22bolt32
      @savage22bolt32 4 роки тому +2

      @@damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830 I shot a mouse with a .410 shotgun. Blew his head clean off!

    • @southernfoods7302
      @southernfoods7302 4 роки тому

      well said💯

    • @bradlaflamme6127
      @bradlaflamme6127 4 роки тому

      Not saying it cannot be done because I have killed dozens but it usually took more than one shot but the .177 on a pigeon is almost inhumane. .22 much nicer with the benjamin 392. One and done every time.

  • @Jercon100
    @Jercon100 6 років тому +32

    I have had 22 since 1948 still like the 22 best.

  • @badgerrrlattin35
    @badgerrrlattin35 7 років тому +37

    Years ago, tried experimenting with 177 on the trapline (hoping to lessen pelt damage). Field experience dictates strongly to me that the .22 is the thing for animal harvesting.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +1

      +Badgerrr Lattin 👍🏻👊🏻

  • @gideonstactical
    @gideonstactical 8 років тому +32

    Been interested in getting air guns thank you for this video.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  8 років тому +2

      +gideonstactical they are really fun and addictive once you start.

    • @markd4109
      @markd4109 6 років тому

      Wingman115 For sure! Great video

  • @johnkuba5496
    @johnkuba5496 6 років тому +10

    Hey Wingman! I'm all for the 22 cal pellet guns, especially for hunting. Let me tell you about an experience I had while squirrel hunting. I bought my 1st air rifle about 10 years ago. After a lot of searching and comparing I bought an RWS Diana break barrel in 177 cal. Practiced and practiced and got pretty good with it. First time out squirrel hunting I saw 2 greys come across a ravine and jump up on a log about 15 yards in front of me, chewing on nuts. I did it all right. I aimed at one of the the squirrels, squeezed the trigger, and pop! I heard the unmistakable thud when the pellet hit him, and he fell over the back of the log. The other squirrel sat there confused, and I slowly and meticulously broke the barrel of my RWS and loaded another pellet and drew down on the 2nd grey. Pop, then another unmistakable thud as the pellet hit him and knocked him over the back of the log. I waited about 10 minutes, to give them time to bleed out. When walked up to the log and slowly looked over the log, one of the squirrels looked up at me, took off running, then ran up a tree about 40 yards away, and about 20 foot up the tree went into a hole! After a few choice words, I looked over the log again and the other grey looked up at me, took off running, ran up the same tree and went into the same hole the 1st squirrel went into! Again a few choice words! I went home and the next week, sold my 177, bought a Benjamin Marauder in 22 cal, and haven't looked back! I do have a couple of 177's but they are collectors air guns only! Only the 22 cal for me, for hunting anyway! Thanks for your time. John from Cedar Rapids, IA.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  6 років тому

      Thanks for the comment and stopping by.

    • @WoodShane
      @WoodShane 11 місяців тому

      Loved the story.... I can see that happening.

    • @DKNguyen3.1415
      @DKNguyen3.1415 6 місяців тому

      Sounds like a comedy act

  • @justinmcleod141
    @justinmcleod141 6 років тому +14

    I use both calibres. I used to prefer the .22 but decided a few years back to balance out and get into .177 too. They're very similar in effectiveness against small game, but refreshingly different in terms of accuracy and velocity.

    • @sosteve9113
      @sosteve9113 4 роки тому +3

      I have both myself .177 and the .22, .177 go's faster but the .22 has more punch .both are great

    • @peterbaugh51
      @peterbaugh51 2 роки тому +3

      Velocity with enough mass is king.

  • @jerrycrowe8448
    @jerrycrowe8448 4 роки тому +8

    I started out with 177 for the inexpensive ammo available and flat trajectory. I also love to punch paper and at that time thought little in the way of pest control. I now live outside the city and recently purchased a 22 and wow what a difference when it comes to knock down power. I don't believe I waited this long, so bottom line is get both. I like the 177 for teaching and target work and 22 although can be used for those things I prefer to use them in the field.

  • @michaelkuntz427
    @michaelkuntz427 7 років тому +3

    thank you for the great video, as of right now im shooting .177, after seeing your video im going to have get a .22 as well my wife and i are just getting into the sport of air guns, we plan on teaching our kids

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому

      +Michael Kuntz Good stuff. It is a addiction for sure.

  • @bushtrash2286
    @bushtrash2286 4 роки тому +12

    Ever tried loading a 177 with cold fingers ?

  • @emmettrocks2
    @emmettrocks2 8 років тому +2

    Loved seeing a Air Gun video!
    I own both calibers of the pumpers in the video & enjoy them both alot. My .177 is my target gun, both paper & spinners. My .22 is the tree rat eliminator in my backyard. BOTH are very quiet & very accurate to about 12 yards for me. I also have a modified 2240 that does both target & hunting duty VERY well.
    Thanks again for the Air Gun video Wingman115!

  • @redneck6548
    @redneck6548 5 років тому

    I have watched many videos on youtube in regards to air pistols and rifles and I was always disappointed with the lack of information on the videos. You are a truly youtuber! This is what I’m talking about! Amazing video and after watching it, I don’t feel like I lost 10 minutes of my life, like I usually feel watching other ones. Congrats on the videos and keep up the good work! You just got a new subscriber!

  • @JohnParishPhotos
    @JohnParishPhotos 7 років тому +25

    I'm a .22 fan boy.
    love the .22 for target, plinking and hunting.
    I do have one .177 rifle and a few .177 pistols, but I always prefer my .22.
    I think it's a generation thing, I've grown up with .22 rifles.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +5

      Me as well. Thanks for checking in.

  • @thesplitwood
    @thesplitwood 4 роки тому +5

    Which ever one makes you a shooter is a credit to the sport...I like them all.

  • @southernexposure123
    @southernexposure123 3 роки тому +2

    I have the 1377, but strongly considering getting the .22 cal because of the power difference. Thanks for the video.

  • @Coronash69
    @Coronash69 7 років тому

    Very helpful. I have a Crossman 760 that was handed down to me by my grandfather, but wanted something more suitable for hunting. Your video along with other online resources have helped me decide on the .22 caliber. Thanks

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому

      +Coronash69 Keep shooting my friend.

  • @Ray2001ify
    @Ray2001ify 5 років тому +26

    Only have a 177 and can't say anything has ever got away after being shot

  • @fullmoonprepping4024
    @fullmoonprepping4024 7 років тому +6

    I was going to add, that on Pigman's channel he has a vid of him taking a wild pig with a gamo silent cat (I believe) using only a .177 pellet. Shot placement really is the Golden Rule. I Love your channel, man. Keep it up ad I'll keep coming back :-) And I'm a sucker for airgun stuff :-)

    • @Sol_Invictus510
      @Sol_Invictus510 4 роки тому

      Fullmoon Prepping and using a pellet with decent expansion/energy transfer.

  • @xiavue2606
    @xiavue2606 7 років тому +2

    i have a 1322 crosman myself..love it..need to see more on airguns video

  • @intrepid5592
    @intrepid5592 7 років тому +3

    I'd go for the .177 now but I used to shoot nothing but .22's before and they are deadly at shorter ranges. I've grown older now and not a very effective stalker anymore so i'll shoot from longer distances with optics..great videos...

  • @vanillagorilla6845
    @vanillagorilla6845 6 років тому +9

    i like .177 because it seems to be alot more common around here in stores to find tins

  • @garycrandall8649
    @garycrandall8649 7 років тому +3

    I'm a reloader and cast bullet fan, I also have two air rifles in my collection. I've always been a fan of heavy bullets because they simply hit harder. This man is right for going to the .22 caliber. In my inventory, I have a Gamo Hunter extreme and a Benjamin Nitro Trail both in .22.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +1

      Thanks for the comment Gary.

  • @starlingblack814
    @starlingblack814 Рік тому

    Thanks John for the review. I have two of these and both in .177. I've killed several ground squirls with them and ate many woks of stir-fry of sparrow. I put the carbine stocks on both. One with a scope other with the add on steel breech and upgrade iron sight. Am now leaning toward the 0.22 cal. and think I need a couple more in this caliber. Great survival gun that is quite and will put small game in the pot. The lower you can live on the food chain, the greater will be your chances of survival. Long after the elk and deer have been shot, the small game will still remain.

  • @jasonc2334
    @jasonc2334 6 років тому

    Thanks man. You helped me make my decision to get the P1322. I've always used .177 and had this gun in that caliber way back in the day, but now I'm needing something to hunt squirrels, etc. Thanks! I'm looking forward to having fun with this gun.

  • @MRT_H
    @MRT_H 7 років тому +137

    Buy both! Can't have too many!

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +15

      I agree.

    • @MRT_H
      @MRT_H 7 років тому +7

      Wingman115 And a few big bores for the more difficult targets! I'm testing out my homemade .50cal pcp rifle tomorrow, will have a video up on it very soon!

    • @joeyv4362
      @joeyv4362 5 років тому +1

      MrTurbo458 congratulations! stupidest comment on here

    • @desertrainfrog1691
      @desertrainfrog1691 5 років тому +2

      @@joeyv4362 Maybe if we omit your comment from that evaluation.

    • @RyanSpringer1984
      @RyanSpringer1984 5 років тому

      I bought 2 Beeman. One Kodiak & one Grizzly (both are dual barrel). That's on top of the other ones I own so I tend to keep the .22 barrel on.

  • @badgerrrlattin35
    @badgerrrlattin35 6 років тому +4

    My .22 gives good results with lead round ball as well. If hunting, I strongly suggest that .22 cal. Tried using a .177 as a trapline tool once and was badly disappointed.

  • @M134mai
    @M134mai 7 років тому +2

    First off, great to see a newer vid from you again, regarding our favorite little toy. Secondly, TBH I use both calibers almost on an equal basis and enjoy both calibers for what they're good at. For pest control I use the 1322 with carbine shoulder stock, and to keep my pistol skills from degrading I use the now discontinued Benjamin HB17 in .177 or 4.5mm. So to sum up, for pest control, no question... 5.5mm or .22 cal - and for fun and target practice you can't do better than the affordable 4.5mm or .177 cal

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому

      Good stuff thanks for stopping by.

  • @Dannyedelman4231
    @Dannyedelman4231 4 роки тому +1

    I am a 177 man you have so many options for ammo it's insane

  • @ratdog3055
    @ratdog3055 7 років тому +8

    A pellet rifle or pistol is great to keep your shooting skills sharp. I have pistols and rifles in both calibers. Both require proper pellet placement. For distance I would go with the 177. For larger game, I would use the 22. I cant really say which is better as both have taken a bunch of game and pests. Saving up for my next rifle, a 25 caliber springer. Should be interesting.

    • @ratdog3055
      @ratdog3055 7 років тому

      PyramidAir.com has them as do several others including Fin Feather Fur here in Ashland, Oh

  • @behindenemylines3361
    @behindenemylines3361 8 років тому +6

    With either one - I would put a shoulder stock on them (and a scope). You just can't hold it steady enough as a pistol. You can't go wrong with either one! As with ANY hunting situation, shot placement is the key!

  • @AvoidingChores
    @AvoidingChores 8 років тому

    great timing for the video, I was perusing the air guns at the canadian tire the other day and wondering about those models. too bad I "lost" my air rifles when I left home for school, never saw them since.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  8 років тому

      Jim these are really affordable and a great way to keep the skill set up. Thanks for stopping by.

  • @FirstStateAirgun
    @FirstStateAirgun 4 роки тому

    Love em both.. Modded my 1377.. And doing my 1322 next. Had one if these in the 80s

  • @stevenolson1443
    @stevenolson1443 6 років тому +4

    Thank you so much for posting this video. This is exactly 100% what I wanted to see. Was deciding between these exact two models that both sell for the same price. You covered every question I had. Awesome review! Thank you very much

  • @rhilton1881
    @rhilton1881 7 років тому +4

    Wingman, I think that one advantage that the .177 size has over .22 is that you can fire pellets AND BBs. I don't have a preference, but I'd like to try a .22. The more mass pellet has, the better stopping power at close range, perfect for varmints and other targets. It goes without saying, of course, that a .22 carbine or rifle trumps them all!

  • @stephenrongner-cook5454
    @stephenrongner-cook5454 Рік тому +1

    .177 my whole life since I was a boy (I’m 48 now) but recently discovered the Crosman 2240 CO2 pistol and am now hooked on .22 caliber! All calibers have their place. 22 is a great all-rounder, though.

  • @sameold77
    @sameold77 8 років тому

    I've had the 1377 for many years mainly to plink around with and take out doves and the occasional squirrel. The 1322 would be preferred for small game. Great video and thanks for taking the time to share on this topic.

  • @cbr600rrturbo
    @cbr600rrturbo 8 років тому +6

    great vid bro!

  • @justinmetcalfe3540
    @justinmetcalfe3540 6 років тому +9

    I use the airgun for pest control around the house and property. When you think about that there is no better way to go than .22 calibre. The one thing you don't want to happen is to cause the pest to suffer from​ pain. With .22 calibre it's one shot and goodnight Irene. Also, you don't want to have that injured animal to scamper off into your drywall and dying, only for you to have to tear apart a wall to get to the critter and chase again. There is nothing worse than the smell of a dead mouse in your house.

    • @damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830
      @damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830 5 років тому

      Yeah i shot a mouse with 177. Pointy pellet and it took about 30sec for the mouse to die.
      After the hit it wasn't able to run anymore but it could take minutes for it to die depending where you hit. My pellet hit the longs and passed through so it bled a bit though its nose but still 30 sec probably is quite quick.
      Air rifle with scope probably would be ideal so you can shoot more vital spots.
      22. Is definately better for pest control and causes less suffering but still probably not instant death but that's just how it is.
      Cat had fun with a dead mouse after outside at least.

    • @bucmeister7713
      @bucmeister7713 4 роки тому

      @@damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830 Would also suspect a bit more thump with a bit less pass through with the slower 22. Bout like comparing a 9mm vs 45ACP

  • @writercabbullock240
    @writercabbullock240 5 років тому +1

    I have a .177 in that same pistol you have. Didn’t like it much until I modified it into a short riffle, lol. I also have a .177 in a 1200fps and 1650fps and the power of that Gamo Magnum was most surprising UNTIL... .50 Umarex Hammer baby! I waited my butt off on the waiting list for this work of air gun art for weeks!Amazing.... Air gun are the future at this rate of excitement!

  • @campfire52
    @campfire52 8 років тому +1

    Thanks for the information on those air guns, it is much appreciated. I have been thinking about getting at least one of them since it is getting so ridiculously expensive to shoot my regular center fire and rim fired guns. I will still keep them too of course, but, it would be nice to have something a little cheaper to use once in a while when I just want to go out and do a little "plinking." Take care John, you make great videos.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  8 років тому +1

      +campfire52 Thanks for stopping by.

  • @adventureswithfrodo2721
    @adventureswithfrodo2721 7 років тому +5

    ammo prices sux. I have been thinking of going to a 22 cal Crossman, 392 I think. had the 177 as a kid. thanks for an informative video.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +2

      Your welcome.

    • @bucmeister7713
      @bucmeister7713 4 роки тому

      You are correct about the ammo prices. The prices Wingman115 was quoting for pellets used to be the price for a bulk box of 500 22 LR rounds. So it also sux that 500 pellets alone cost $10-12 and that is for standard designs, when you get into the newer offerings those prices climb as well.

  • @vansantsam
    @vansantsam 7 років тому +108

    I am a 177 fan.. All things being equal the 177 steps out ahead... the only advantage a 22 has is at closer ranges with blunt force trauma, however a pass through the heart or brain with a 177 still is a kill... a 177 starts to show its strengths at distances beyond 20 yards... All things have terminal velocity and the 22 will reach terminal velocity sooner thus it will slow down quicker and loose more energy the further the distance gets... For example shooting a 16 grain from both the 177 and 22 the muzzle energy and velocity will be almost identical however at 50 yards the 177 will be going fast and retain more energy... The flatter shooting will also mean less misses because of misjudged distances.. Also the 177 requires less energy to penetrate so at distances if it is going fast and retaining more energy then it will penetrate much easier and way deeper... shooting small pigs could extend your killing distance to a greater distance because it could penetrate the skull easier and get into the brain. It takes less force to drive a 10 penny nail than a spike... If you are going to go ratting at 10 to 15 yards then fine the 22 will blast the hell out of them but for long shots on jack rabbits, coon, smaller ferrule pigs then the 177 will have a higher velocity and more energy and penetrate easier and deeper and shoot flatter... And in reality you may also find that some lighter bullets in 177 will deliver way more energy than heaver 22 caliber at longer ranges... Physics and terminal velocity do not lie... If you took a 16 grain 177 and 16 grain 22 and dropped them out of an airplane the 177 would hit the ground sooner because the 22 will reach terminal velocity sooner and not be able to increase its speed and slow down much sooner than the 177... You can see this in action by taking two balloons and blow one up and leave the other unblown and drop them both at the same time and the unblown balloon will hit the ground sooner because the one that is blown up hit terminal velocity and can't go any faster toward the ground... everything drops at 32 feet per second and increased by that same amount for each second until terminal velocity is reached and it cant' go any faster because of the resistance of air.. so the first second it will drop 32 feet the next second it will drop and additional 64 feet and the next second it will drop and additional 96 feet and continue until it can't go any faster... that is its terminal velocity, when the body in motion is slowed down because of the air resistance... a larger diameter bullet of equal weight and design will slow down more and quicker than a smaller diameter bullet... thus it will have less velocity, less energy retention and less penetrating properties.. so a 177 will best a 22 at any distance... And who shoots anything at muzzle... so even at close range the 177 will still kill just as effectively, you may get more pass through and not blow a rat half way across the yard but the rat is still dead with his heart or brain torn to shreds... and you won't break every bone in his body but he is still dead... So if you are not a good shot then keep your distances close and use a 22 if you are a half way decent shot then use a 177 for all distances... and you will kill game at further distances... and also have less misses attributed to a flatter trajectory with misjudged distances... You can't cheat science no matter how much you want to..

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +4

      Thanks for watching.

    • @edgarlombera7066
      @edgarlombera7066 7 років тому +17

      Jim Richard I respect what you're trying to say but you're way off... all pellets leave the muzzle at their maximum velocity... they don't increase as they go farther. Being dropped from a plane and being shot from a barrel are two completely different things. The .22 will always retain more energy down range because it's heavier plain and simple. It takes more velocity for a .177 to reach the energy of a .22. Will it shoot flatter yes if you're comparing them with their energy. But if you shoot both a .177 and .22 at 900fps the .177 will lose energy quicker because it will lose velocity quicker then a heavier pellet. And finally a .177 will over penetrate more than a .22 because it has less surface area. When it comes to air guns you want most of the energy to transfer on your quarry. .22 may penetrate less, at certain velocities, but will create a bigger cavity for a quicker dispatch.

    • @vansantsam
      @vansantsam 7 років тому +7

      Same rifle only different cal. .177 cal with JSB 13,43 has muzzle velocity of 807 and fpe of 19, and 50 yards downrange it has 607 velocity and 11 fpe. on the other hand a .22 with JSB Express 14.30 grains has a muzzle velocity of 708 and fpe of 16 and downrange to 50 yards it has 547 for velocity and 10 fpe... If the 177 shoots an equal weight bullet of the same design it will travel fast and hit harder than the .22 because there is less wind resistance and the .22 slows down too quickly.... obviously if you shoot a .177 with 7 grains vs the .22 with 18 grains then the .22 will have more energy but that is not comparing apples with apples... but if you shoot similar weight pellets then the .177 will dominate and also penetrate deeper and easier because of the smaller diameter and at 50 yards they claim that it takes the .22 an extra 3 to 4 foot pound to equal the penetrating properties of the .177, again smaller diameter will penetrate easier and deeper if the weight of the bullet is about equal... In order to leave the energy in your game is only a matter of bullet type... pointed vs round nose vs hollow point... .177 also has many more variety of pellet weights and styles than are offered with the .22... If you can't penetrate and reach the vitals then you only wound an animal.. so which one of equal weight will bust through skull and other bones easier - .177... They claim that it takes only 5 fpe to kill a rabbit with good shot placement that means that the .177 can dispatch a rabbit at around 135 yards with a pellet weighing around 13 to 14 grains, because at that range it has 5 fpe... and the .22 with 14-15 grain pellet, at that 135 yards only has about 3 to 4 fpe (and it may not penetrate properly to get into the vitals)... You may also want to consider trajectory, the .177 shoots much flatter than the .22 of equal weight bullets which means you could miss a shot because of misjudged distances with a .22 and with a .177 that is not such a critical issue... A .177 can break 1 inch disc at 20,30,40 yards (about the size of a rabbits heart), where as the .22 will break the 20 and 40 and shoot right over the 30 yard one... because of its bell shaped trajectory... a miss is a miss is a miss... no matter if you tried to shoot it with a tank... Each to his own and if you like the .22 them by all means use one but I prefer the .177 because of all the benefits and also it extends your kill range from 5-10 yards over a .22... This same argument went on years ago with the 270 vs the 30-06, and we all know how that turned out... the 30-06 had more energy and shock at closer ranges but at longer distances the 270 showed it's dominance... and also at close ranges the 270 had more than adequate energy (even though the 30-06 had more)... But if you paired the 270 with 140 grains and the 30-06 with 150 grains then the 270 was very close to the same energy at close ranges but again showed it's true colors when the distances were stretched to 400 and 500 yards... So there ya have it... I will stick with .177 all day... Which would you want to get hit with, a golf ball or a softball if they were thrown with the same amount of force... I think the golf ball would hurt a great deal more... and the golf ball will travel further and slow down less than the softball..

    • @edgarlombera7066
      @edgarlombera7066 7 років тому +4

      Jim Richard the .270 shined because it has a better ballistic coefficient, better ballistic coefficient better down range energy because the BC makes a bullet retain its velocity better at long distance. But you can't compare pellets to bullets they're apples vs oranges. With pellets, the shape and weight affects its BC typically round nose pellets have a better BC and a heavier pellets increases it. A .22 jsb has a better bc than a .177 jsb period. Of course if you shoot these two caliber from the same power platform the .177 will shine no doubt about it. I prefer the .22 because I don't shoot em from low powered airguns, each caliber is restricted to a certain energy and a heavier .22 shot at 900fps will have way more energy then a .177 shot at 900fps, more energy, more damage, more penetration etc.. bigger is better when it comes to pellets. A .25 will outperform a .22 in every way as well

    • @edgarlombera7066
      @edgarlombera7066 7 років тому +3

      Jim Richard you don't want to dispatch a rabbit with the minimal power it takes to take one out. At 135 yd what's the chance you'll actually hit it? Let's talk realistically here not numbers. Even for my $1300 .22 I would never take a shot at a rabbit past 100 yd

  • @scott762mm
    @scott762mm 5 років тому +1

    I was raised on .177 pellet guns as a child, I typically would be able to shoot them fairly accurately but I felt it was always lacking knock down power. I am happy to report I am totally switching to .22 pellets. I have completely revamped my air gun arsenal, and for starters I purchased the crosman 1322 pistol. I have a crush on a Kral Arms .22 puncher breaker . (I just need to justify the cost) thanks for the video.

  • @davidgraemesmith1980
    @davidgraemesmith1980 7 років тому

    I had a customized webley nemesis in .22, it had reworked cylinder/piston and porting to start with then I went nuts and made a scrounged .177 air rifle barrel fit it (lots of manual filing and polishing) as a long heavy barrel, use pellets on appropriate targets, .177 on birds/rats/squirrels (head shots) and .22 on rabbit's etc

  • @pandarama67
    @pandarama67 7 років тому +4

    I would take the 22 but what I would really like to see is someone make these things more balanced. I bought one from walmart a while back but it was so ridiculously unbalanced and impossible to be consistently accurate with I returned it and bought a ruger air riffle instead.

    • @2DangerousDan
      @2DangerousDan 6 років тому +2

      IDK, if you aren't really weak the balance and it's effects on accuracy is not a problem. The 13xx airguns are not very heavy and they are used accurately by many people including some kids. A technique to shoot accurately for those with weak wrists may be rested (for target practice) or two handed if no rest is available (for hunting). My Grand-kids over 10 years old and I don't find it impossible or even difficult at all to shoot it even if they need help to pump it!

  • @angeldevil8581
    @angeldevil8581 6 років тому +26

    what matters is placement , the type of animal and were you put that pellet

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  6 років тому +1

      +Angel Devil 👍🏻👊🏻

  • @Bkw8n2hunt
    @Bkw8n2hunt 7 років тому

    I'm absolutely in love with this discovery it's a tack driver. I have only tried Crosman 14.3 hollow points and the power and accuracy is unbelievable I'm having a blast with this thing and getting the workout Pumping It Up. I'm already eyeing a .25 Marauder

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому

      Thanks for commenting and stopping by.

  • @GovtWatchdog
    @GovtWatchdog 7 років тому

    Great vid! Just what I was looking for.

  • @robbarry17
    @robbarry17 7 років тому +5

    I shoot both hunting yes .22 but accuracy on .177 can off set. I have 50/50 but I have kille dchocks with 177 but you are correct .22 is more forgiving.

    • @sosteve9113
      @sosteve9113 4 роки тому

      I have both myself .177 and the .22, .177 go's faster but the .22 has more punch .both are great

  • @JR19k
    @JR19k 6 років тому +6

    I have both 22 and 177 and I prefer the 177. it shoots faster and further. seems to be more accurate. the 22 is good for close range but the 177 wins on distance.

  • @benedictbenjo7136
    @benedictbenjo7136 7 років тому

    I standardized on the .177. Found a used Daisy 880 for $20 and a used Gamo Bone Collector for $50. They both prefer the same pellet and I stocked up on them when a tin of 500 was $4. Last month I bought a Crosman M4-177 and I just ordered a Benjamin Trail NP pistol. Now I am reconsidering cancelling that order and getting a .22 rifle instead.

  • @JustusStrong74
    @JustusStrong74 4 місяці тому +1

    I got a 177 crosman pump pistol.paid 349 $ for it.but i live in New Zealand...ammo 20-30 $ a tin.I think thats really expensive? But it was worth it,i love it.great vid bro😊

  • @viper2788
    @viper2788 7 років тому +3

    Grew up using .177 but I def prefer the .22. Its much better suited for hunting and I can still get plenty of range with a reasonable trajectory.

  • @donze52
    @donze52 7 років тому +3

    own the 22 cal. pellet gun you show-- problem is noise, got hearing damage and the gun is to loud -- need some kind of silencer cheap thing to use, can't seem to find or build -- should be legal since it is an air gun-- any thoughts

  • @johncosta110
    @johncosta110 6 років тому

    I’m glad I watched your showI have a 2240 CO2 wanted to buy another 1377 after watching your show and convinced to buy a 1322 less confusion It’s not the money it’s pennies but the confusion of what to do I thank you for your explanation good luck your friend Walter

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  6 років тому

      Thanks for watching John.

  • @philipbooth9755
    @philipbooth9755 Рік тому +2

    There’s some crossover now with the larger range of pellet choice. There’s .22 lead as light as some .177 and .177 heavies as heavy as some .22

  • @cheifreal
    @cheifreal 7 років тому +4

    they both have a place. mice, rats, squirrel I like .177 for flat trajectory and accuracy. for racoon and such I like 22 for energy down range. I'm actually relatively new (6 years) for the .22. I grew up with the red Rider and the 1377 and have used both since. can't beat the red rider for a wake up when the horses are actin up.

  • @markstevelum-chou1357
    @markstevelum-chou1357 7 років тому +13

    i like the .22 cal...it's hitting hard and with distrution....

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +2

      +marksteve lum-chou 👍🏻👊🏻

  • @TheGreatBeard
    @TheGreatBeard 7 років тому +1

    I just picked up my first 1322 because it was on sale, $30 off. I have a bunch of other airguns but this is easily one of my favorites.

  • @ramohino
    @ramohino 4 роки тому

    So I had a conversation with my son on which to buy today and my phone was sitting right next to us now this video is recommended really.

    • @ronnguyen8287
      @ronnguyen8287 4 роки тому

      Just ordered the .22 cal.

    • @aidenschvatkok5732
      @aidenschvatkok5732 4 місяці тому

      Yeah I’ve had that happen. I have zero interest in dungeons and dragons. Never once searched it online. Was talking on the phone with my retired dad, he has some friend who is into it so he was going to try it out. What do I see on my phone 2 hours later… ad for dungeons and dragons. Creepy google is listening lol

  • @extrastuff9463
    @extrastuff9463 7 років тому +5

    I really like both, each for their own purpose really, the .177 is nicer in my opinion to punch small holes in paper. Most importantly for me is perhaps that if I have guests over its really simple to explain to them "only shoot the reactive targets on the right side with the .177". They will easily hold up to my old break barrel, crosman 1377, crosman 1077, etc. Most will even handle the Weihrauch HW35 in that caliber.
    However those targets will certainly get wrecked pretty fast when shooting them repeatedly with the Weihrauch HW97k, gamo coyote or benjamin marauder pistol in .22 cal. Fortunately I do have a few more robust targets beyond just paper set up on the left side that can handle everything I've thrown at it so far with only minor maintenance being needed.
    For active hunting I suppose I would be inclined towards a .22 or .25 PCP or if I want a self contained powerplant an underlever spring .22 rifle like the HW97K. However hunting laws are pretty restrictive here, not allowed with airguns and you have to apply for a hunting permit and go through some more hassles for the guns and permission to hunt in certain areas etc. If I had to though I'm fairly confident I could get the pellet to land on target, been doing enough outdoor shooting with various wind conditions varying from short to a decent 50-60 meters regularly.
    Judging the distance reliably and fast in an unknown area is a skill that'd be sorely lacking though since I usually use the same place for that and know how far all the objects are apart (markers along the wall every 5 meters for my own convenience). Of all things getting that down might just be the hardest one, ofcourse I suppose I could cheat with a laser rangefinder.
    It might be an excessive collection just for punching holes in paper and shooting more interesting targets that do something, but I've found that its a good way to relax after having thought way too much about stuff during the day at work. And at the same time get a little bit of light physical activity done rather than sit at the couch watching tv after being stuck at the desk all day at work.

    • @peterbaugh51
      @peterbaugh51 2 роки тому

      Give me an accurate 177 air gun shooting 950 fps 8.3 gr dome pellet and I will show you dead home wrecking pests. All day.

  • @samuelmorado70
    @samuelmorado70 4 роки тому +3

    Leaning towards a Ruger elite 2 hawk .22

  • @47kcr
    @47kcr 8 років тому

    I'm a .177 guy. I grew up using this round for plinking. When I started hurting I went to.22 then I learned how to diesel a round. Of course I don't do this with my Benjamin but I'll do it with my Crossman. I've shot squirrels this way and almost ripped them in half, especially with a ballistic tip round. I know this is not the response you were looking for but I love the topic of air guns. Great video!

  • @JohnFourtyTwo
    @JohnFourtyTwo 3 місяці тому

    Late to the video, just found it. I’m 57 years old and haven’t been involved with air rifles since I was a teenager and all I had back then were a Daisy 105 (looks like the Buck), a Marksman 1911 repeater pistol, and a Crosman 781. Never heard of a .22 air rifle until a couple years ago but would’ve loved to have had one as a kid.
    I thought the 781 didn’t work anymore since it had been setting up in my parent’s house for about 40 years but after a couple drops of 3 and 1 oil (didn’t have any Pellgun oil) and a few cycles it started holding a compression and shooting BBs pretty accurately about fifty feet. I’ll replace the O-rings eventually.
    The other two were long gone to air rifle heaven from being completely worn out.
    I’ve recently started getting back into air rifles and man have those prices gone through the roof.
    So far I got all new Daisy Buck, Youth Red Ryder, and 880 Powerline. I also have them all their own soft rifle case that fits including the Buck which really surprised me but it’s made by Allen for short barrel shotguns but it fit the Buck perfectly.
    I plan on buying a few more from Crosman and the Adult Red Ryder Carbine before I get into the more expensive models that cost almost as much as my real firearms.
    As for my favorite, 177 or 22, I will have to say the 177 because you can shoot BBs also which are cheaper than pellets. They’re both for plinking and I’ll use my real guns for everything else of a serious nature.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  3 місяці тому +1

      Thanks to posting a comment.

  • @raiderscreed8999
    @raiderscreed8999 3 роки тому +3

    Its all depends on the fps if you got a 700+ fps 22 airgun its gonna be better then a 1000 fps 177 airgun. If you have a weaker 22 such as the crossman it would not have the same devistating effect as a higher velocity 177.

  • @dustinh4175
    @dustinh4175 4 роки тому

    I had an old daisy 880 sawed off pistol griped that i took the barrel out of and put it in crosman vigilante and its super accurate

  • @scoopdedoop2673
    @scoopdedoop2673 8 років тому

    only ever had 1 air rife, rws model 48 in .177 30 years old and still shoots great

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  8 років тому

      +SCOOP DE DOOP they were made to last.

  • @joeyv4362
    @joeyv4362 5 років тому +6

    .177 by far for long range hunting

  • @dudemccallaster1421
    @dudemccallaster1421 6 років тому +11

    Careful man that mod train is a hard one to get off...

  • @euanreid6682
    @euanreid6682 7 років тому

    The .22 pump rifles were awesome for firecracker launching.... we also had those .22 darts when i was a kid.

  • @Bkw8n2hunt
    @Bkw8n2hunt 7 років тому

    I've always shot. .177, but I've got a .22 pcp on the way. my first and I can't wait to get her seasoned and tuned in.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому

      Let the big dog eat! Congrats on the new rig.

    • @Bkw8n2hunt
      @Bkw8n2hunt 7 років тому

      I'm absolutely in love with this discovery. it's a tack driver with Crossman premier 14.3 hp. they're the first ones I tried and I'm very impressed with its accuracy and power.

  • @rudypericolo
    @rudypericolo 5 років тому +3

    177 for me. Im a target shooter, don't hunt other than the occasional nuisance rodents (even a bb going anything over 500fps put right behind a rat's eye will usually go right through its head killing it instantly. Though i prefer pellets for that use) so knock-down power isn't really a pressing concern for me.
    So for (both guns and ammo) the price, availability and that pinpoint accuracy I don't seem to get with .22 I go .177. Oh and for some guns the ability to go pellet or bb is a nice option.

  • @jyotirani8232
    @jyotirani8232 2 роки тому +3

    In my country, we can't buy .22 without a Licence.
    So compromised with .177
    But I LOVE MY INDIA 💕

  • @mg6192
    @mg6192 4 роки тому +1

    .177 makes more sense for pistols since pistols are fairly weak and are meant for shooting planks instead of hunting. The flatter trajectory with a .177 pellet is more forgiving when trying to be accurate. If you really want to hunt game, then a rifle that fires either .177 or .22 pellets would be much more logical than a pistol that fires .22 pellets. So I feel the 1322 is more niche as it doesn't beat the 1377 in terms of accuracy and it doesn't beat a rifle for hunting; It's kinda stuck some where in between.

  • @pinoiboi13
    @pinoiboi13 7 років тому +1

    awsome video. I just made me figure out which one to go with. im going 22.cal. already has the 177 but it messed up. time to upgrade.

    • @paulward2668
      @paulward2668 5 років тому +1

      j peezy, it! doesn't mess up? you messed up!!

  • @qg786
    @qg786 8 років тому +3

    I use 177 for pistols and pistol carbines. And 22 for full length rifles. I prefer the 22 though. :)

  • @CowboyAxe
    @CowboyAxe 3 роки тому +5

    1377 is so accurate, so it is the exception for an air handgun, head shots on small game is too easy using that model.

  • @deltafoxtrot2
    @deltafoxtrot2 4 роки тому +1

    Great video! I have had .22 and .177, these days I only shoot in my back yard plinking and taking out the odd rats that ventures in. For me .177 is the best calibre with my BSA Ultra SE as it has a flatter trajectory near the legal UK limit of 12ftlbs (6ftlbs for pistols). If I was in the US I would opt for the .22 as the extra power above the UK limit would flatten out the trajectory. I am also thinking about buying a crossman 1377 to shoot in my garage at low pumps.

  • @fullmoonprepping4024
    @fullmoonprepping4024 7 років тому +1

    I replaced my Crosman 760 with a new Daisy 880 and Love it. Of course it's .177, but I have a Beeman break barrel in .22 to cover that end. I know that the "10 pump limit" is nearly scripture but after having a conversation with the Daisy Technicians I was assured that more than 10 pumps would indeed increase power and not harm the weapon in any way. They said the danger was in pumping it and leaving it for a period of time, say overnight. They said they wouldn't go crazy and go more than 30 pumps but 20 and up to 30 is no problem. That being said, since I don't have a Chrony I have to just deal with results. Those being; my beeman is a dual caliber so I can swap from .22 to .177. My beeman will put a .177 10.5 gr. Gamo heavy halfway through a one inch board at 30 feet. My daisy at 10 pumps just over a quarter inch. At 20 pumps the daisy will put that same pellet through the board. I can also get a dime sized group from that Daisy at 50 feet. So, like you said it's about the use. For me a lightweight but very hard hitting .177 is great for hunting on the stalk because the range drops off so quick. A .22 is great for blind or fixed hunting where you can stay in position and reach out 50 - 70 yards effectively. If you have the power - like this Daisy does - 50 feet or closer the calibers are almost irrelevant (though quarry size is a real factor). Of course, one needs to do their due diligence and find the right pellet for their gun or it's a moot point. Cause you know as well as I that airguns have an attitude about the pellets they like :-) PCPs are a horse of another color however.

  • @BlackRifleSurvival
    @BlackRifleSurvival 8 років тому +4

    .22 sounds like my kind of air gun, good recommendation.

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  8 років тому +1

      +BlackRifle Survival thank you sir.

    • @user-hy4jt8sr6y
      @user-hy4jt8sr6y 4 роки тому

      What about farther?? The .22 cal maximum range is 50 yards it is just too heavy vs the .177 cal maximum range of 400 yards so definitely the .177 is the best option.

  • @calivapor1701
    @calivapor1701 6 років тому +23

    I like .177 its cheaper and I like the challenge of hitting my targets dead on. I find the .177 more available than I do the .22

    • @GridZone.
      @GridZone. 6 років тому +1

      i believe that to be changing rapidly. old guns yes .177 is king, but .22 prince about to take the throne soon in the next 5-10 years will surpass.

    • @user-hy4jt8sr6y
      @user-hy4jt8sr6y 4 роки тому +1

      The .22 cal maximum range is 50 yards it is just too heavy vs the .177 cal maximum range of 400 yards so definitely the .177 is the best option.

  • @hosedragger-204
    @hosedragger-204 7 років тому

    I just got a Crosman 1377 for my birthday. I am having my grandfather help me sight it in because it shoots ~2" high and ~1.5-2" to the right of my point of aim when shooting from a bench with sandbags. Once I get it sighted in I plan to carry it deer hunting with me for shooting squirrels that come within range or decide to sound the alarm on me. I can do this because deer season occurs during squirrel season here in VERMONT, USA.

  • @mystikgeome6604
    @mystikgeome6604 7 років тому +1

    this man has such a great attitue

  • @illinoisdoglover8675
    @illinoisdoglover8675 6 років тому +4

    I live in Illinois where air guns are regulated. 177 is cash and carry but 22 is treated like a fire arm. it stinks, but we are stuck. FYI I DON'T live in Chicago.

    • @kenkrauklis765
      @kenkrauklis765 6 років тому +1

      I hear you bud on that crap!!!!!

    • @kenkrauklis765
      @kenkrauklis765 6 років тому +2

      I like to call the state Suckinois. From HIGH taxes to lame crap like air gun regulations, Illinois just flat out SUCKS!

    • @zaclarock730
      @zaclarock730 5 років тому

      Same here. Also they require a foid for .177 over 700 fps. I've heard some stores don't ask for a foid afterall airguns aren't registered so idk. I'm sure online vendors would still ship to your house though. Going to try that.

  • @GWHcraig1088
    @GWHcraig1088 7 років тому +3

    .22 for most small game hunting is the way to go. .177 is fine for head shots on small pest birds and chipmunks at close range.AA 410 FAC .22Browning mag pistol .22Crosman 1322 backpacker with steal breach kit / scope .22Crosman T4 .177

  • @waltercostellotruth9198
    @waltercostellotruth9198 5 років тому +1

    Awesome brother I just got my American classic in 177. And I love it what a kick ass gun. Yes comparing this to all my other BB pistols this one will definitely kill. not that I'm trying to kill anything, it's just nice to know I can.
    God bless

  • @22skiddoo
    @22skiddoo 4 роки тому +1

    We have a 12ft/lbs limit on air rifles here in the UK - any more than that and you have to go through all the faff of a Firearms Certificate, signatures, verifications, photographs, lockable security, inspections by police officers (who don't necessarily understand what they're looking at), plus restrictions on where you can use them. I stick to 12ft/lbs guns and I know my pellet is going to deliver bags of energy when it gets to where it's going, the difference being that the .177 pellet travels faster than the .22 and therefore has a flatter trajectory. So when I'm taking shots at a variety of distances and I'm in the field so I don't have the luxury to keep taking out my rangefinder and consulting drop tables, the .177 is my calibre of choice every time. The bunnies aren't so keen on it though...

  • @megunded
    @megunded 7 років тому +11

    you asked for opinion why you/me/us all like .22 or .177 ....ok here we go
    i am from germany and we have pretty strict gun laws , you can buy an airgun " free " when its muzzle energy is less than 7,5 j ..thats about roughly 5,5 foot pound...or 175 m/s which is about 575 fps ....if you want to stay in the legal limits , ..you can imagine what " average " trajectory you get in an air rifle in .177 and what " under average " trajectory in .22 ......no need to talk about .25 .....
    so there are some reasons to go with .177 .
    - cheap ....the cheapest pellets are about 3 Euro / tin of 500 ...which is about 3 dollar and about 15 or 20 cent actual
    - flatest trajectory in " legal " limits
    - highest variety of pellets
    - 10 meter match.............intl. standard match
    so away from the match .....let me tell you something about my air rifles
    i own
    - diana 48 bought used in a pretty bad shape , tuned with a custom "oiled wood " style stock , new seals , new spring , utg droop compensator rail , medium rings and swfa ss 16x 42 scope .....pretty nice gun , shoots well , is a lot of fun because it has a lot of recoil ( pg2 tune)
    and the pretty old awfull trigger ( i am looking forward to change to a t06 system ) ..sometimes i hate it to shoot .But is demanding ....so i pretty much like it for that !
    - FWB 601 ( Feinwerkbau ) a former Recoilles precompression match rifle , it is like a single shot pcp with less power , due to match regulations it has exact 7,5 j and i measured it on 10 shots with a non noticable deviation , if you put in in a gun vise and use wadcutters at 10 meter , you have basicly ONE hole in the diameter of the wadcutter !
    it is field target converted with a falcon 5-25x 50 ffp side focus on it , and with H&N field target trophy 4,51 0,56 g pellets at 50 m ( 55yard) it shoots group ( in a vise ) less than 10 mm
    - weihrauch hw 80 ( beeman r1 ) ...mostly standard except for a 3-9x42 scope .....going to sell .
    a friend of me uses a weihrauch hw 97k in .25 with 7.5 j standard spring , he was " blinded " by the heavy pellet and the theoretical stability and knockdown power .
    my holdover at 50 meters with the fwb ( 30m zeroed ) is about 3,2-3,5 mils or about 17 cm.....and it hits ( kneeling or prone ) consistant targets in 10-15 mm ( about 1/2 inch )
    the 25 is zeroed at 30 m too and his holdover is more than 1 meter ! a hit is almost coincident . his pellets land 2meter in front or 3 meters behind the target ( usualy standing bottle caps on a magnetic plate )
    so ...i dont go for a hunt or shoot at animals at all ...i like the .177 for plinking more
    for " extreme " long range shooting ( 75 m or more ) the .177 is not the best , because it looses so much speed , but you need at least 12 foot pound of energy in a 22 to have an advantage for longer ranges , so if you want to stay legal ....no way
    if you have more power in a 22 , its ( for me ) wasted energy for plinking , target shooting or field target .
    more power in a .177 gives you the opportunity to get a flat trajetory and stay safely subsonic with heavier pellets for stability .
    regards , eddie

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +2

      Thanks for the comment Eddie.

    • @sosteve9113
      @sosteve9113 4 роки тому

      It would be scandalous to buy it over the border,like the Netherlands there rules are less strikt

  • @jimmytolliver1614
    @jimmytolliver1614 4 роки тому +5

    I got my gamo pcp in .177 that shoots 1900 FPS+ and my .22 Remington break barrel that shoots around 1200, both do a amazing job with varments. But with the .177 I can shoot 100+ yards confidently while I’m still getting used to the .22

  • @michaelcurtis8114
    @michaelcurtis8114 Місяць тому

    I have them both and can't decide which one I like better. Both are consistently accurate. I shot a target 3 times at 20 yards with the .22 caliber and thought I missed two of the times. But after I looked closer I noticed that all 3 shots hit the same spot.

  • @claudfry
    @claudfry 3 роки тому

    Terrific Video!
    Thank You !

  • @luwdmke
    @luwdmke 7 років тому +4

    I'm a Ruger & Dan Wesson .44mag fan

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  7 років тому +2

      +luwdmke I can't afford the ammo. That's why I shoot pellet guns.

  • @kevlar6836
    @kevlar6836 5 років тому +5

    22 is subsonic in my platform.

  • @jonnyboat2
    @jonnyboat2 5 років тому

    I have an RWS .177. Since the scope won’t hold a zero anymore, I have been having trouble finding a scope that won’t break. What are economical scopes that are rugged and last. After owning a 177, you learn pretty quick that you need a heavier caliber. 177 is great for plinking even at a good distance, but 22 or 25 is what you need for small game.

  • @thefirstmissinglink
    @thefirstmissinglink 6 років тому

    Best mod I made on mine was the carbine stock. 8 rounds of 177 into the same squirrel and nothing. These NM critters are tough!

  • @mechredd
    @mechredd 7 років тому +4

    I think that the proper caliber often depends on how powerful your gun is. .177 tends to be better in lower powered guns but often looses accuracy in high powered or supersonic guns. The .22 often under penetrates with low powered guns but hits hard and keeps it's accuracy, especially at long range, with the high powered rifles.

  • @ryanhanson660
    @ryanhanson660 6 років тому +4

    A.177 fan

    • @Wingman115
      @Wingman115  6 років тому +1

      If it works for you that's a good thing. Shot placement it the key.

  • @papuchu
    @papuchu 5 років тому +1

    when i was a kid i had a .177 spring rifle and i've hunt a lot with it .22 were scarce. so i was a big fan of .177. Later on my 30's i got some .22 and i liked it very much, but at that time i wasn't a hunter any more. Nowadays in my 60's weapon laws are so restrictive in my country (Spain) they have spoil all the fun of air guns, can't hunt with an air rifle, can't shoot anywhere but in a range facility, and the most powerful airguns are cut down to a maximum 24 joules (17.7 foot-pound)

  • @pauloarinto8139
    @pauloarinto8139 7 років тому +2

    I own a few 177 springers and I got my 1322 about 1 year ago and is a awesome platform.
    I just disagree about pellet cost- we know we get different groupings with different pellets because the barrel chooses the pellet so if you have 2 airguns in .22 you still may need one type of pellet to each gun.
    For hunting, .22 is just better at small and mid ranges, .177 is better for long ranges, you know why :)