An honest reporter that doesn't have a one sided agenda.... i wish this man was even more popular. People see MSM instead of John...wish it was the other way around
@samplexample same. Libertarians understand economics, personal freedom and have a great foreign policy ideas. However I left the party when they started heading down the "open borders" path and trying to appeal to that crowd. Everywhere else though I think the Libertarian party is right on target.
@@midmichiganrr24gp9 I'm a libertarian and the thing with borders is: We do want open borders because we don't want government at all But under the condition that our money is redistributed to all within the borders, we do want strong borders. The true solution to immigration crisis is not strict borders and big walls, it's the end of money redistribution. Then freeloaders won't come and we will only have hard-working immigrants coming in, like myself.
@@iaroslavtitov2270 That is what I Thought the libertarian party was going for. But it seems they were hell bent on open borders and trying to cater to the Far left/antifa types and not addressing the need to end the welfare state (either open borders or welfare you cant have both) . I even asked at my local libertarian party chapter meeting about ending welfare but they were more keen on open borders instead of ending welfare. But in my opinion people can not just be traded like goods in immigration/emigration. After traveling the world in the navy and seeing multiple peoples, races and cultures I have to come to the conclusion that certain cultures can not coexist and are best left in their own country. Our current immigration crises is literally taking in people en mass who hate america (whites in general) and will simply vote in a socialist authoritarian government. Not saying all will, but the vast majority will vote this way. This is something that the Libertarian party also needs to take into consideration but they seem oblivious to this.
Deregulation is good and bad. Years ago they deregulated the trucking industry and pay has dropped by 50% because they never abolished cent per mile pay while drivers being regulated by the hour. Imagine sitting for hours in traffic not getting paid or anything else that's not driving. What needs to happen is drivers need to be paid by the hour with overtime after 40 hours like every other job and cent per mile pay must be abolished.
@@r.d.9399 If the driver doesn't like how he is being paid, he can go to another trucking company - except, there is lesser competition because regulations are costly which causes fewer competitors and thus lesser competition. It's simple. If the government regulates, then a corrupt bureaucrat can bankrupt the system and now you have no competition and you don't have those regulations enforced. With a free market, there is no single individual to corrupt, since all individuals are acting in their own profit motive. It's a vicious cycle. Regulations come in - competition lowers - people get exploited - more regulations come in and so on.
Thank goodness for him. No wonder, with only the MSM around as a major voice for 50 years, we are where we are today. Before then, the MSM would uncritically announce a new regulation with a pretty sales pitch name while selling us poison at our own expense.
Do you believe big business is a living thing that is capable of love? And do you realize some regulations devastate and actually limit large companies?
If you raise minimum wage to $15, it'll hurt big businesses, yet destroy all startups (their competition). Do democrats want to hurt small businesses? No, they just want to take money from lobbyists who DO want to crush their competition.
@@izafanime If a business can't pay an employee a wage where they can pay rent buy gas food and insurance, do they deserve to be a business? Many startups will still succeed, just the ones where the CEOs are willing to work for less or free to get their company going.
@@identityvdreamwitch3557 yes, yes they do, because the issue isn't the businesses, its the politicians, what makes it harder for businesses to provide for everyday living is when you include mass immigration and heavy regulations on building new homes, all of this raises the general price of living and decreases wages that businesses are stable of giving to everyone they hire. How is a business that is starting supposed to provide enough to support someone that has a crappy apartment, that is supposedly worth millions of dollars? The demand exceeds the supply and the prices of everything are driven up, this is why inflation hits so hard everytime a the minimum wage raises, not only that but jobs are lost and now people have a harder time to get hired and the ones that didn't lose their job now have to work harder and faster for less hours.
People who complain about cutting regulations have never tried to start or run a business. Jesus Christ, the regulatory red tape is a waking nightmare!
If your business can't be profitable while adhering to regulations, its a bad business. It's easy to profit if you pay workers unlivable wages or dispose of waste improperly. If you don't adhere to regulations, the taxpayer foots the bill, either through government handouts like food stamps, or costly programs to clean up the enviorment.
@@chadaltobelli5099 You clearly haven't seen some of the regulations out there. They literally protect nobody, but are an absolute pain in the ass, and the government spends billions a year investigating businesses for those regulations. You can google "dumb business regulations", you'll find millions. I'm not even gonna waste the time copying them. You know what's worse? Regulations from various agencies sometimes contradict each other. Luckily, that's rare, but if you run into one...
@@chadaltobelli5099 Spoken like a good socialist. Try running a business sometime, and see if you want the government interfering every step along the way.
I'm a huge Trump supporter but I love that John Stossel brings both sides of the argument, he shines a light on the incredible things Trump has done that the MSM won't make a peep about, while still criticizing him for some of the not so great things he's done. This is REAL, FAIR, and UNBIASED news!
The British Patriot not only is this true journalism but it used to be law in the land that news journalists had to tell both sides. This was deregulated around the time of bush sr or Clinton.
This guy is so misleading my god. Don't believe this guy without confirming exactly what it means to deregulate. For example. They are not telling you what car to buy, the regulations are just for making the car manufacturs make more fuel efficient cars but with the same car. Which means less money you spend on gas and better for the environment. It's already happening in Europe.
@Deon Denis don't think the cause with that because it's more fuel efficient. In any case that was not my point. The comment of the guy from the video was completely misleading and inducing people into erro. No one is telling you what car to buy
read the thing he repealed. none of them looked bad and useless. the changes hes talking about pollution wise dont happen with a 4 year span they happen with maybe a 10-20 yyear span and MAN the things he appealed are terrible for the envoremtn i mean just read it JUST READ IT heres the worst examples in my opinion 1. repealed emision limits for coal power 2.repelead obama methane limits 3.5g internet infrastructere exempted from enviormental review (this has not been reserched enough but it should not be exempted becouse we dont know the effects fully 4. repealed clean power plan i mean man he is a true climate change denier and i know china is a dirty stinkhole and produces most of the pollution. and i am not much for believing the news i always assume people that are trying to convince me of things have an agenda i was a trump supporter before he said he was a climate change denier
Funny, Canada usually comes out consistently ahead of the U.S. on those economic freedom lists. Also, Canada spends less than the U.S. per capita on socialist entitlement programs.
@@sneed915 Tastes great, but my 9 roommates in our $1.9M two bedroom apartment always try to mooch. At least the big corporations can afford to comply with regulations. If not we couldn't even hold down our part time jobs at Starbucks!
@@battleskorpionYT Maybe higher taxes but how much do you pay for health insurance? How much would a surprise visit to the hospital cost even with insurance? If your work covers you what happens if you get fired? What if you want to leave your job. How hard will it be to find an employer with an equal or greater health plan?
@Derek Mitchell exactly that's why call myself a classical liberal because personal freedom and free enterprise. Agree with conservative values sometimes but they can be to self righteous and insecure or don't take risks.
@Derek Mitchell The Left couldn't be less about individuals if they tried. They are all about "group identities", unions not workers, races not people.
@@rinrinsparkles1986 Personal freedoms, except when you disagree with them; then you're shut-down. The right has always been about live & let live (except for some select religious sectors).
@C F LOL, the left tells everyone what to think, what to do, what to drive, what to eat, what to watch, there is nothing the left won't leave alone, and you better not be thinking or acting outside your designated racial or sexual orientation box, your a traitor if you think for yourself. _"ThE rIgHt WaNtS tO cOnTrOl WoMeN's BoDiEs!",_ I see you are a good leftist and repeat everything you are told to think. You're the ones telling us we must pay for your stuff, you're reaching into our wallets to subsidize your sexual escapades, and if we don't comply you want the government to shut us down. So now, who's controlling? It looks as though you believe every lie the left tells you without any thought.
Deregulation is currently happening in Indonesia. Building company used to take months, and now only 20 days the longest. Economy surge, more jobs created, start-ups popping up, increasing transaction and may more. Limited government is key to build better economy!
The really important point is what kind of regulations are put in place. Things like "No, you can not dump chemicals into the river" or "no you can not become a monopoly" or "no you cna not conspire with your competitors to raise prices". All of which is happening freely in the US right now. Internet companies LOVE the loss of net neutrality, which means they now have the ability to control what is available on the net and what isn't simply by governing what speed the content is provided at. They have the ability to set individual pricing for access to certain sites etc. Of course it wont happen that noticeably, instead it will be carefully rebranded to look like a good thing for the consumer, when in the end, you end up paying more for less. Blocking unions is terrible for the workforce, since now workers have virtually zero bargaining power for an increase in pay or improvement in benefits etc. And no way to fight benefits being stripped away, something the US government also is working hard on doing. No regulation on medication prices means the US pays 5-10 times what other first world nations do, and for no reason other than CEO/shareholder profiteering. Yes, deregulation CAN stimulate, but it ultimately means that the common person has ZERO protection from the will of those that sit at the top, the moneyed interests who could care less about whether you live or die. See 50.000 deaths per year in the US from lack of medical care. Aka "you don't have enough money, thus you are sentenced to death". Trying to spin deregulation as something 100% positive is an open lie. Deregulation has one primary effect. It gives those with a lot of money the ability to get more money, and to pretty much do as they please, whilst the result for the broader masses will be virtually nothing. The wealth that is being generated flows to the top and remains there. Why do you think real worker wages virtually haven't changed in the US in the last 50 years? Whilst CEO pay has surged by over 900%? Why do you think there are caravans of people going to canada to buy insulin, so they, you know, dont die from being too poor to buy overpriced american insulin? Deregulation isn't intended to choke big business and harm everyone. The primary intention is to protect the environment and the common people from the interests of large corporations, which are often at odds with both of them. Of course that will curtail profit or sometimes have negative consequences. But removing them will ensure a split of consequence. Positive for the rich, negative for everyone else. Sure there might be some more jobs, but they won't pay well, because the value of work is unilaterally set by the employer, with the employee having no say. A take it or leave it mentality is put into place, and when faced with earning little money with no way to rise through the ranks or no money, one of course takes option one. No financial security is still better than no finances at all. The rest of the world is definitely looking at the US with a very worried gaze. Of course right-wing populists cheer, because they view the stripping away of rights and the unfettered pursuit of money as something praiseworthy, as well as getting to vote people against their own interest (see brexit, it'll be an economic disaster and likely re-ignite the civil war in northern ireland. But muh pride and independence. Sure.)
@UCvxfdtPqO5Y_XXv0wYE7FIQ True. Problem is, right now the US is cutting a lot of essential regulations - like emissions standards and other pollution related things, or financial regulations that were implemented to stop another financial crisis from re-occurring. Re-allowing stock buybacks also is contributing hugely to wealth inequality. I agree that yes, some regulations could be choke holds, if implemented poorly etc or for the wrong reasons. But what is currently being thrown out by the US government is absolutely essential, and will only do two things. A) make the rich richer, B) make life for everyone who isn't rich worse.
In my college, the Dean of Sustainability said, "Government regulations do only the minimal to change environmental factors, entrepreneurs are the real driving force behind environmental change."
How sad but true, regulations world wide are used to halt competition among small businesses in the name of environment protection, where in reality we can make REAL regulations that can really stop pollution, tax the plastic industry if you want to protect the environment, subsidise concrete alternatives if you want to repair marine life.
When the massive corporations are for a regulation, you have to question it. Regulations pushed by corporations have been one of the largest drivers of shutting down small businesses. The big guys can absorb the cost while the little guys can't. Then the corporation gains market share and passes the cost to the consumer.
LA river is perfect example. Why people in California don't care about their waterways is beyond reason. My conscience won't let me through garbage out anywhere. People must not have a conscience for their environment.
It all started when Congress started handing over the keys to these laws to the Executive Branch. The Executive Branch moves faster than Congress, and the only ones responsible to the people are the President and Vice President. Regulations are unconstitutional by virtue of the fact that they are laws created by the Executive Branch. The Executive Branch does not have the power to create laws, just enforce/execute them.
M Row, Indeed!,you selfish person you! Some poor CEO's kids are probably going to have to go without an upstairs swimming place at the summer place in the Hampton's,or some such heinous atrocity! How do you sleep at night! LOL!
Yup. The advancing technology of internet speed gives every website access to fast connections. There is no need for the government to get involved in the matter.
Same, my bill went down and my speed nearly tripled, was it related? I don't know but it sure as hell didn't kill the internet. The only thing doing harm to the internet currently is the companies who are censoring everyones opinions like mad
A lot of this is because of the expansion of fibre infrastructure. They can support such a ridiculous amount of bandwidth now. The fear with the repeal of net neutrality though is data caps, which are starting to appear now ever more frequently slowly but surely. My internet speed is almost always throttled at the end of the month because I “use too much”. When you have speeds of 1000MB (aka 1 gigabyte a second second ) it is very easy to hit that 1 terabyte (1000 gigabyte) data cap and then they throttle you.
Yes Imagine seeing the assholes who make corrupt laws in the supermarket every day. Politicians who would have to stand with their backs turned, having to trust the people behind them in line to not hurt or kill them while they get groceries or get gas.. Those people would have to see the people they screw over every day and interact with them and maybe even have to deal with the people they screwed over so badly they became violent. And the corruption would end much sooner from the politicians once they had to literally deal with the repercussions of their actions- positive or negative. As they would have to stare those they rob and oppress In the face each day Instead they hide in office buildings with armed security and laws that give them immunity from their criminal behavior and immunity from consequences of unconstitutional legislature.
I was always under the impression that the government’s function was to ensure that we are guaranteed life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, not to control us.
That's just a spin job. The purpose of the 'regulations' you demonize is to protect the life (osha, epa, fda, cwa, ntsa, faa, etc) liberty (Voting Rights Act, EPA again) and pursuit of happiness (ADA, Title IX, etc) of citizens that just don't happen to be YOU! The libertarian wants the right to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater, ignoring the fact that while he may never wish to actually do that, there are many who would. Thus, the birth of the regulatory state. If you really want less regulation, pressure the people and corporations who continually probe and push the boundaries of absolute legality looking for a way to profit at the expense of the people around them.
Government is people just like you, but they should aim to achieve what’s difficult for individuals and small groups. As for happiness, my dear it’s within, no one can pursue something that’s inside !! Pursuing Is almost like a dog chasing his tail.. lol 😂 Always behave humanly, otherwise you put yourself in a position where you need to be controlled.
@@roddaman7545 why cant i yell fire in a crowded theater if there is one? that issue is based off of truth. if its not true then they can pay for whatever harm they caused
If there was no government not only would most of our incomes double, the value of that money would be over 25 TIMES what it is now just from inflation, the hidden tax, alone. (Thats only counting inflation from 1913 to 2018) The true cost of government to society is astronomical. Difficult to imagine just how much wealthier we'd all be without them.
@David Ringlein we give a lot of money to all countries if we cut all funding to all 3rd world countries we could quickly stop the growth of debt Israel just isn't 3rd world but they are a good ally to have in the middle east if terrorists become a problem again
Ever won money from the lotto before? I’m sure you went and immediately put that $100-$1000 towards your mortgage or car payment.... Oh what? You mean you didn’t spend money you didn’t earn in a responsible manner? I’ll be damned Same goes for government
I've learned more about Trump's presidency these past few weeks from this channel than I did from all other "news" outlets combined in the last four years.
As someone who worked within the rules over EPA for nearly 14 years HAZMAT Certification, Shipping and Transportation as well as disposal of dangerous and explosive substances, I completely agree! We were once fined by the EPA for emergency destruction on an EPA approved site for proper disposal of explosives over a period of decades... Fort Carson EOD was fined when we were unable to dispose of an emergency disposal operation on their time... We can't just determine when an emergency will arise! It'd be like fining the fire department for not showing how to put out a fire to demonstrate it wasn't violating EPA by spreading hazardous materials with water. They'd literally need to set someone's property on fire to create a response! EPA is corrupt with power and known for its back-deals that end in pseudo bribery for special favors. I've seen people resign for the allegations alone.
Kenneth Bowers That money in your pocket isn’t yours, though. It’s the federal reserves. Without them your money is worthless and you’re going to have to go back to non fiat currency which would be the end of American influence in the world. The powers that be are not going to let that happen.
Government in general loves rules..... They love rules because you have to break some of them and then they can penalize you and fine you and perhaps take your property.... it's all about control and always has been
As an independent I don’t have to agree with everything that President Trump says or does. But I’m a Capitalist, that’s why I will vote for him in 2020. Socialism will put 90% of this country in poverty.
@@michaeljackson6107 It's a symbol of southern pride, most people know it has zero to do with hate or slavery but sadly the history has been rewrote and the narrative changed to push a agenda, when we forget history, change history, take down monuments we are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past. We are all American no matter race, sex or religion and our nations diversity and willingness to work together have made us great. I pray to god we never see another civil war but the two party system, identity politics, state rights, open borders and people who hate what America represents is tearing us apart.
@@MrMundo3d We all need to gather information from multiple sources and form a educated opinion on the information available. I agree with this news story and the numbers dont lie. If you do not see any bios in the media you are blind. John Stossel has been a reporter for more than a few years, he always represents both sides of the story, does not lie or make up facts and I have never seen him pass judgment or attack anybody he does not agree with. The man is what a reporter should be.
@@michaeljackson6107 I hope you dont mind, I would like to share this link with you that might help explain this flag. We are all in this together. MAGA2020 ua-cam.com/video/q1vQTMX2ELs/v-deo.html
I'm a registered member of the Caddo Nation.. I have "free universal healthcare" provided by the government and tax payers.. and guess what? I have a secondary insurance company as a backup incase the indian insuance takes too long for something major.. as it stands right now, for checkups on my children it's a 6 month wait.. for checkups on myself it's a year waiting list.. checkups aren't super important, but if that's the list just to check if I'm healthy or not.. think about the list for a major surgery or something.. Yea.. its "free".. would I recommend someone rely entirely on government run healthcare? Hell fucking no..
@@SludgeManCometh it's funny you brought up leg amputation. When My father first got the Gout his Doctor wanted to take his foot!! Yeah second opinion on that one for sure...
Justin Joy Imagine getting sued by a hospital for your healthcare costs because you don’t have the means to cover your $400k bill for your heart surgery. You work a low paying job, so there is no hope of them recovering the debt from you. So, the hospital itself ends up eating the bill(collections agencies will make your life miserable but can’t draw blood from a turnip). Then, the hospital closes because too many schmoes like you think it’s cool to be a deadbeat. Your community loses a hospital that was professionally run to be replaced by a medical clinic. These places still rake your wallets, but give the shittiest care administered by some fresh off the plane Achmed or Abdul who has brought his whole clan over to facilitate the great replacement. You now have a joke for medical care in your community, but despite watching family and friends die from the most idiotic causes, you’ll never admit that keeping that hospital with fancy high paid doctors was worth the cost. Funerals are cheap and easy! Think I’m lying? Go and visit any rural community out beyond last mile range in this country. Hospitals are closing left and right and the one stop med clinics are all over the place. Look on the map for where the latest mosques have opened. You’ll notice a pattern very quickly.
I wish they would deregulate diesel pickup trucks. The emissions systems are terrible. It's fun trying to haul horses across the Nebraska prairie on reduced power because the dpf is plugged. Milage is about half of what the old trucks were. Added $10,000 to the price tag.
I wish they would regulate dirty, smelly, toxic diesel engines off the face of the earth. I really do cough when I smell diesel fumes. I really don't give a F#$% about you hauling your hobby horses across Nebraska. Why aren't you riding them? It's a travesty that you haul in a trailer an animal designed specifically for traveling on its own four feet. And don't come complaining to me when you fail to maintain your DPF system and suffer the consequences as a result. No sympathy for you or your hobby.
@@dlwatib well if you knew how those systems work, the same things are still coming out of the tail pipe. All these systems do is raise the exhaust temperature up to 1000 degrees. If regen cycle starts you have to keep driving. On tier 4 tractors when regen cycle starts they run for about 45 minutes at full throttle. The dpf plug because that is what what they do. Milage has been cut just about in half. I tell me how an engine burning almost twice the fuel pollutes less. I wouldn't assume my horses are a hobby either.
Dan W you’ll have to excuse that idiot. Most likely a liberal that has never stepped out of the shithole city he lives in to even know what a diesel truck is, much less how it operates
@@irocksup123 also doesn't understand how the diesel engine has made his life better. His comment about my horses tell me he's probably never been near one. When the service manager in Nebraska tells me that when the warranty is over to delete the emissions I think that says it all. I was invited to a branding and the horses were there to get a job done if it really matters. Like I'm going to ride 900 miles instead of hauling them.
irocksup123 your right man liberals hate everything. He even said he hates horses so who really cares how he feels. I love Diesel engine pick up trucks haul stuff a lot better than gas engines and most of all longer engine life.
I noticed all the big youtubers shilling about how it was gonna destroy youtube and the internet quickly shut the hell up and never returned to the subject
There are shows on youtube thstvare getting shut down and they have changed their algorithms. So yes there has been some changes to the internet. I like John Stossel but if you fact check him you will find he is biased towrds the right.
The argument about net neutrality in this video is so wrong that make me question the validity of other arguments (which all of them I agree, but maybe I should pay a little more attention).
@@supersuperjhon So what is the correct argument then? That it DID destroy the internet? It was a set of crazy regulations from 1934 (Title II of the communications act of 34') that they slapped on the internet in order to have more control and supposedly protect against evil ISP throttling/blocking (which has never even happened in any serious manner), and took power away from a real regulatory agency, the FTC. Good on Ajit Pai and the Trump FCC for repealing Title II "net neutrality" regulations from the web.
Thank God for (the people left on) UA-cam- If it weren't for people spelling things out to me I could never understand this stuff, and I'd be in the dark.
Hey dont be so hard on yourself. You were smart enough to realize something is up and that one way or the other led you here so I think your better than most.
This is what’s sad about this. The lack of transparency and simplified language makes it difficult for most people to comprehend the laws and regulations that are being discussed and voted upon.
Or how about a Nevada power consumer can't even have cost effective Nuclear Energy due to NV Energy's (i.e. Warren Buffet's) "Natural Monopoly" on electricity. Oh well - there's always somewhere else.
3:58 Exactly! They are there to influence you emotionally with comedic satire. The news should be a source of real information that allows YOU to form an opinion on your own!
@Templar Only a relatively small number. Of everyone leaving Commifornia, only about 4% go to Colorado (raising Colorado's population by 0.5%). More popular destinations are Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and unfortunately Texas which is #1 on the list.
The problem with most regulations and laws is that somebody will find a loophole and new regulations/laws have to be added to fix the loophole. And then people find loopholes in the regulations/laws that are supposed to fix the loophole. Resulting in more new regulations/laws to fix the loopholes in the fixed loopholes. And so the cycle continues.
@Kathy Sharp Well, you have a good point. A lot of regulation is created just because the whole purpose of the legislative institution is to create new regulations.
When net neutrality was repealed, my ISP (tiny, family-run company on the WA coast) created a new premium offering: 200mbps down / 50mbps up + unlimited bandwidth. It isn’t cheap, but more than offset by cancelling DirecTV.
@Kathy Sharp but IPS's clients are already paying for their own google traffic. Google doesn't force their data into their users, the users ask for google's content. Also, when IPSs receive a google package, they charge the other ISP who passed that package to them. And in case you are wondering what is google paying, just because you want to see google losing some money, they pay their internet connection to the ISPs they are directly connected to. What if you build your own data center and people is Azerbaijan wants to access it, should you pay to their ISPs?
I want all those regulations back! I want Big Brother controlling my life, after all , the government know best and is looking out for me ( and thinking for me). I'm voting democrat 2020! NOT !!!
@Peg Leg Really? Ok, then would you please point out "righteous" slave master Trump and "evil slave masters" Clintons in the quote below? "If you wish to keep slaves, you must have all kinds of guards. The cheapest way to have guards is to have the slaves to pay taxes to finance their own guards. To fool the slaves, you tell them that they are not slaves and that they have freedom. You tell them that they need law and order to protect them from bad slaves, then you tell them to elect a government. Give them freedom to vote and they will vote for their own guards and pay their salary. They will then believe they are free persons. Then give them money to earn, count and spend and they will be too busy to notice the slavery they are in." - Alexander Warbucks
@Peg Leg Since you mentioned the world "cartel," here is a fact for you. ALL governments are nothing but criminal cartels with a monopoly on violence which they use to enslave humanity so your belief in a "righteous, non cartel" ruler like Trump and/or a "righteous side" is an absurdity. "...the State is fundamentally an anti-social institution, fundamentally criminal. *The idea that the State originated to serve any kind of social purpose is completely unhistorical. It originated in conquest and confiscation - that is to say, in crime. It originated for the purpose of maintaining the division of society into an owning-and-exploiting class and a propertyless dependent class - that is, for a criminal purpose.* *No State known to history originated in any other manner, or for any other purpose. Like all predatory or parasitic institutions, its first instinct is that of self-preservation. All its enterprises are directed first towards preserving its own life, and, second, towards increasing its own power and enlarging the scope of its own activity. For the sake of this it will, and regularly does, commit any crime which circumstances make expedient."* Criminality of the State mises.org/library/criminality-state Is there anything else you'd like to say?
"if you get your news from late night shows" never better said, frigging leftists dominating the media. I honestly cried when stossel retired from Fox business, I'm glad he still does content for reason
@Bear Foxtrot I'm in total agreement with you on the bail outs, how many times have they bailed out the auto industry only to come back and do it again while as you say the executives still gave themselves enormous bonuses after filing for bankruptcy. These companies steadily increase the salary up top and then beg for government help, we have to start holding these companies responsible for their business dealings and get people that will operate the business as it should be run or get out. The Federal government is not there to bailout failed corporations, that only allows underhanded deals by politicians.
One of the reasons why Trump will get relected. If were going to recover from the next recession, we need to let the free market lift itself out of a slump and stop reckless government spending.
BWAHAHA. Says "we need the free market" but supports Trump who uses ten planks of the Communist Manifesto policies to TAX and REGULATE the market. Hint: TAXATION and Regulation= UNFREE market. Strange how you magatards make the same fundamental mistake as Communists and Socialists in not knowing what a free market is.
It seems that when a business wants to make or even keep its own money it is called greedy, but a politician who wants to raise taxes and impose job-killing regulations, they aren't called greedy. I see politicians as the real greedy people, they didn't earn that money and most of the crap they spend tax dollars on is a total waste.
Su Nam (Kevin) Jang - I think he has come to his senses on that. I’m sure multiple people have pointed out the big issues with red flag laws. Or I hope they have....
For Trump, as a businessman, initially all options are on the table. Then you evaluate the pros and cons and go from there. As someone who has been relentlessly targeted by the media and democrats with false accusations, I hope Trump understands the very real danger of opening up backdoors for the liberals to use to rob all of us of our rights.
America *was* great. Now if you're one percent wealthy, yes, he's helping you. But 99 percent of us are not happy. Ninety nine percent. Plus the cult of ignorance.
@@miapdx503 I'm in the 99% and its helping me. I've also seen more help wanted signs and ads in the last year than I've seen in the last 35 years. So, maybe it is helping but the lazy people just cant be helped bc they are so used to hand outs.
@@miapdx503 wow that's crazy. All I was doing was stating what I've seen with my own eyes and benefits I myself am obtaining. No need to go crazy with calling names and acting that way. Why not state an opinion and have a discussion?
One thing noted in the is that is not pushed to the front enough. Too many regulations produce contradictory regulations. One agency says do this or you get fined, another says do the opposite or you get fined.
☑️stuck at home last spring, so I kept hearing so much about Trump, checked out books on economics from the library in order to follow along. Gotta say, it changed my mind about him...
Doug Wolf Corporations won’t be able to get their men in power by fooling the voters if you do that. Lots of pissed off guys motivated by money will not be pleased.
how is it that Republicans hate government. but always uses the government to benefit them. and not fixing anything that brings wealth to the middle class American people. and mitch McConnell lies about everything just like president trump. to destroy anything that helps our country move forward. social security benefits is being DESTROYED by the elites. rather than to put the money's back that thay borrowed from it. without our consent. we that where born in 1955 will receive less than someone born in 1954 is bull. I worked 2 sometimes 3 jobs to stay in place as middle class. so mean wile having to leave the work place at age 62 to take care of my wife that's suffering from altimmers. and dont receive any extra money's for doing the caring for her .and needed to move out of state because New York state rents are so overpriced that social security benefits do not cover the expenses nor my retirement. and paying out of retirement health care is over 1000.00 a month.its time to change those individuals that are in Congress that make everyone's life a living hell. those individuals don't have a clue what thay are doing. so I and my wife should just bite the bullet and make them happy. so f y s 2020 will be the pay back .can't come soon enough.
I think a Health Review on how 5G effects the human body is needed...as well as a National Security review on if foreign powers can easily use 5G to hack into American devices.
Well it doesn’t really matter since their environmental reviews are a farce anyway. Environmental reviews have found wind turbines to be “safe” and get the green light but there are numerous studies worldwide showing this isn’t the case for many birds and mammals (and likely people) I don’t think they’ve even conducted studies on how wind farms could potentially affect natural vegetation although several studies have shown adverse effects on gardening/farming. The government did an environmental review of the Keystone XL pipeline and found it was fine and then turned right around redid it and found it’s going to single handedly destroy the planet. These reviews and regulations are only as good as the agencies conducting them and they are pretty much all corrupted either by ideology or money. In one small town where I lived you had to get a permit to build a doghouse because they were worried about how that could affect rain run off because it was in a flood zone. Of course you could buy one of the plastic or premade ones that was three times the size of the one you wanted to build and no permit was necessary....
I'm happy about the Tariffs on China. In the long run it will be a good thing. Companies will move to other places instead of a manipulating dictatorship.
Hmmmm. The '5G infrastructure removed from environmental review' sees alarming. Does that include studying its health effects? This demands more investigation!
I'd love to see an episode on building permits and the cost to home owners and businesses. Constitutional right to own property but you have to get the govts permission to live on it. Absurd!
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
John Stossel - just telling it how it is. Praises Trump where necessary and criticizes too. That's real reporting.
@@Chris-rm9mu
Andrew Hubert
Yeah that's what I'm talking about. Journalism is both perspectives and allow people to decide.
#Trump2020
#ReallyWoke
An honest reporter that doesn't have a one sided agenda.... i wish this man was even more popular. People see MSM instead of John...wish it was the other way around
@samplexample same. Libertarians understand economics, personal freedom and have a great foreign policy ideas. However I left the party when they started heading down the "open borders" path and trying to appeal to that crowd. Everywhere else though I think the Libertarian party is right on target.
@@midmichiganrr24gp9 I'm a libertarian and the thing with borders is:
We do want open borders because we don't want government at all
But under the condition that our money is redistributed to all within the borders, we do want strong borders.
The true solution to immigration crisis is not strict borders and big walls, it's the end of money redistribution. Then freeloaders won't come and we will only have hard-working immigrants coming in, like myself.
@@iaroslavtitov2270 That is what I Thought the libertarian party was going for. But it seems they were hell bent on open borders and trying to cater to the Far left/antifa types and not addressing the need to end the welfare state (either open borders or welfare you cant have both) . I even asked at my local libertarian party chapter meeting about ending welfare but they were more keen on open borders instead of ending welfare. But in my opinion people can not just be traded like goods in immigration/emigration. After traveling the world in the navy and seeing multiple peoples, races and cultures I have to come to the conclusion that certain cultures can not coexist and are best left in their own country. Our current immigration crises is literally taking in people en mass who hate america (whites in general) and will simply vote in a socialist authoritarian government. Not saying all will, but the vast majority will vote this way. This is something that the Libertarian party also needs to take into consideration but they seem oblivious to this.
John Stossel...plays the devils advocate, skeptic, and voice of reason and common sense all in one
He is a superhero.
John Stossel has more freedom of the press this way than working for ABC, his old employer which is a multi Corporation. Good work JOHN 👍❤.
@blue46gt He is... objective argument man!
Only an angel will take on the role of "devil's advocate".
China has influenced our laws in their favor. They have better opportunity than us. California requires all air compressors to be registered.
John Stossel talking about deregulation? Never clicked on a video faster in my life.
Same! Haha.
Wow I am just relieved to not hear, "I came at the speed of gay!" I see that so often... Almost once a day... It's so corny and dumb...
Deregulation is good and bad. Years ago they deregulated the trucking industry and pay has dropped by 50% because they never abolished cent per mile pay while drivers being regulated by the hour. Imagine sitting for hours in traffic not getting paid or anything else that's not driving. What needs to happen is drivers need to be paid by the hour with overtime after 40 hours like every other job and cent per mile pay must be abolished.
@@r.d.9399 If the driver doesn't like how he is being paid, he can go to another trucking company - except, there is lesser competition because regulations are costly which causes fewer competitors and thus lesser competition. It's simple. If the government regulates, then a corrupt bureaucrat can bankrupt the system and now you have no competition and you don't have those regulations enforced. With a free market, there is no single individual to corrupt, since all individuals are acting in their own profit motive. It's a vicious cycle. Regulations come in - competition lowers - people get exploited - more regulations come in and so on.
@@alfstewart2592 😂😂😂😂😂🍻
I said it before, and I'll say it again:
John Stossel is the mustache of reason.
Visda58 sometimes that mustache is very peculiar and fizzled though... as in his reasoning in this case 🤦♂️
Its only a mater of time before hes labeled a ''Nazi'' because hes not far right or left.
But greed is good..
And you are the bearded commentator of the day.
Heard you the first time...
"...get your news from late night comedy shows" says it all.
You beat me to it! I got a belly laugh outta that! LOL Thank you, Mr. Norquist!
Or getting them from Twitter, which is even worse.
John Stossel continues to be the only real journalist.
Thank goodness for him. No wonder, with only the MSM around as a major voice for 50 years, we are where we are today. Before then, the MSM would uncritically announce a new regulation with a pretty sales pitch name while selling us poison at our own expense.
Him and Tim Pool
Don’t forget to mention Fredo.
James okeef. John stossel. Tim pool. Fleecas talks.
@@CYBER_FunkER I'm liking Tucker Carlson for political commentary we do not hear anywhere else. On the left, Jimmy Dore.
Big business loves regulations. Small companies are crippled by them.
Do you believe big business is a living thing that is capable of love? And do you realize some regulations devastate and actually limit large companies?
Implying they aren't lobbied for by big corps directly. If they hurt big corps badly the small ones go out of business.
If you raise minimum wage to $15, it'll hurt big businesses, yet destroy all startups (their competition). Do democrats want to hurt small businesses? No, they just want to take money from lobbyists who DO want to crush their competition.
@@izafanime If a business can't pay an employee a wage where they can pay rent buy gas food and insurance, do they deserve to be a business? Many startups will still succeed, just the ones where the CEOs are willing to work for less or free to get their company going.
@@identityvdreamwitch3557 yes, yes they do, because the issue isn't the businesses, its the politicians, what makes it harder for businesses to provide for everyday living is when you include mass immigration and heavy regulations on building new homes, all of this raises the general price of living and decreases wages that businesses are stable of giving to everyone they hire. How is a business that is starting supposed to provide enough to support someone that has a crappy apartment, that is supposedly worth millions of dollars? The demand exceeds the supply and the prices of everything are driven up, this is why inflation hits so hard everytime a the minimum wage raises, not only that but jobs are lost and now people have a harder time to get hired and the ones that didn't lose their job now have to work harder and faster for less hours.
John stossel is a national treasure.
hes a proper reporter.
So jealous
He should be elected president for life.
blue46gt Damn right.
blue46gt If nominated he would not run. If elected he would not serve.
People who complain about cutting regulations have never tried to start or run a business. Jesus Christ, the regulatory red tape is a waking nightmare!
Buddha, the regulatory red tape is a waking nightmare!
@@chrisanderson9157 That too!
If your business can't be profitable while adhering to regulations, its a bad business. It's easy to profit if you pay workers unlivable wages or dispose of waste improperly. If you don't adhere to regulations, the taxpayer foots the bill, either through government handouts like food stamps, or costly programs to clean up the enviorment.
@@chadaltobelli5099 You clearly haven't seen some of the regulations out there. They literally protect nobody, but are an absolute pain in the ass, and the government spends billions a year investigating businesses for those regulations. You can google "dumb business regulations", you'll find millions. I'm not even gonna waste the time copying them.
You know what's worse? Regulations from various agencies sometimes contradict each other. Luckily, that's rare, but if you run into one...
@@chadaltobelli5099
Spoken like a good socialist. Try running a business sometime, and see if you want the government interfering every step along the way.
John Stossel convinced me to be a libertarian.
oh my god hi, I'm a huge fan. So glad you've become a Libertarian. Have you read anything of Milton Friedman yet?
Same here. This party makes sense
Open borders and legalize all drugs 👎
@@cre8iveone699 Controlled migration and legalize all drugs 👍
I wasn't expecting to find you here, Cmilk
( A fan)
I'm a huge Trump supporter but I love that John Stossel brings both sides of the argument, he shines a light on the incredible things Trump has done that the MSM won't make a peep about, while still criticizing him for some of the not so great things he's done. This is REAL, FAIR, and UNBIASED news!
The British Patriot not only is this true journalism but it used to be law in the land that news journalists had to tell both sides. This was deregulated around the time of bush sr or Clinton.
This guy is so misleading my god. Don't believe this guy without confirming exactly what it means to deregulate. For example. They are not telling you what car to buy, the regulations are just for making the car manufacturs make more fuel efficient cars but with the same car. Which means less money you spend on gas and better for the environment. It's already happening in Europe.
@Deon Denis don't think the cause with that because it's more fuel efficient. In any case that was not my point. The comment of the guy from the video was completely misleading and inducing people into erro. No one is telling you what car to buy
Why are you a British Patriot with an American flag???
read the thing he repealed. none of them looked bad and useless. the changes hes talking about pollution wise dont happen with a 4 year span they happen with maybe a 10-20 yyear span and MAN the things he appealed are terrible for the envoremtn i mean just read it JUST READ IT
heres the worst examples in my opinion
1. repealed emision limits for coal power
2.repelead obama methane limits
3.5g internet infrastructere exempted from enviormental review (this has not been reserched enough but it should not be exempted becouse we dont know the effects fully
4. repealed clean power plan
i mean man he is a true climate change denier
and i know china is a dirty stinkhole and produces most of the pollution. and i am not much for believing the news i always assume people that are trying to convince me of things have an agenda
i was a trump supporter before he said he was a climate change denier
The only problem with Trump's deregulation is that it didn't go far enough, I'll take it though!
U forgot, it wasn't easy for him. The media and leftist attacking him all e way
@, not just them, but almost every department that is losing power with every deregulation.
Canada is slowly being strangled by its endless regulations....
Hows that $45 chicken?
Funny, Canada usually comes out consistently ahead of the U.S. on those economic freedom lists. Also, Canada spends less than the U.S. per capita on socialist entitlement programs.
@@sneed915 Tastes great, but my 9 roommates in our $1.9M two bedroom apartment always try to mooch. At least the big corporations can afford to comply with regulations. If not we couldn't even hold down our part time jobs at Starbucks!
@@tkondaks With their healthcare system, and higher taxes? That's hard to believe...
@@battleskorpionYT Maybe higher taxes but how much do you pay for health insurance? How much would a surprise visit to the hospital cost even with insurance? If your work covers you what happens if you get fired? What if you want to leave your job. How hard will it be to find an employer with an equal or greater health plan?
Even as a young child I knew that John Stossel made more sense then most of the news out there.
John Stossel has been the same tried and true since the 80's when I first saw him 20/20. The more things change the more John Stossel stays the same.
And he is right
It's "funny" how Progressive now stands for More Regulation, and Liberalism now stands for Less Freedoms.
@Derek Mitchell exactly that's why call myself a classical liberal because personal freedom and free enterprise. Agree with conservative values sometimes but they can be to self righteous and insecure or don't take risks.
@Derek Mitchell How would you say the right bullies individuals?
@Derek Mitchell The Left couldn't be less about individuals if they tried. They are all about "group identities", unions not workers, races not people.
@@rinrinsparkles1986 Personal freedoms, except when you disagree with them; then you're shut-down. The right has always been about live & let live (except for some select religious sectors).
@C F
LOL, the left tells everyone what to think, what to do, what to drive, what to eat, what to watch, there is nothing the left won't leave alone, and you better not be thinking or acting outside your designated racial or sexual orientation box, your a traitor if you think for yourself.
_"ThE rIgHt WaNtS tO cOnTrOl WoMeN's BoDiEs!",_ I see you are a good leftist and repeat everything you are told to think. You're the ones telling us we must pay for your stuff, you're reaching into our wallets to subsidize your sexual escapades, and if we don't comply you want the government to shut us down. So now, who's controlling?
It looks as though you believe every lie the left tells you without any thought.
Deregulation is currently happening in Indonesia. Building company used to take months, and now only 20 days the longest.
Economy surge, more jobs created, start-ups popping up, increasing transaction and may more.
Limited government is key to build better economy!
Kristian Utomo Tobing well said
The really important point is what kind of regulations are put in place. Things like "No, you can not dump chemicals into the river" or "no you can not become a monopoly" or "no you cna not conspire with your competitors to raise prices".
All of which is happening freely in the US right now. Internet companies LOVE the loss of net neutrality, which means they now have the ability to control what is available on the net and what isn't simply by governing what speed the content is provided at. They have the ability to set individual pricing for access to certain sites etc. Of course it wont happen that noticeably, instead it will be carefully rebranded to look like a good thing for the consumer, when in the end, you end up paying more for less.
Blocking unions is terrible for the workforce, since now workers have virtually zero bargaining power for an increase in pay or improvement in benefits etc. And no way to fight benefits being stripped away, something the US government also is working hard on doing.
No regulation on medication prices means the US pays 5-10 times what other first world nations do, and for no reason other than CEO/shareholder profiteering.
Yes, deregulation CAN stimulate, but it ultimately means that the common person has ZERO protection from the will of those that sit at the top, the moneyed interests who could care less about whether you live or die. See 50.000 deaths per year in the US from lack of medical care. Aka "you don't have enough money, thus you are sentenced to death".
Trying to spin deregulation as something 100% positive is an open lie. Deregulation has one primary effect. It gives those with a lot of money the ability to get more money, and to pretty much do as they please, whilst the result for the broader masses will be virtually nothing. The wealth that is being generated flows to the top and remains there. Why do you think real worker wages virtually haven't changed in the US in the last 50 years? Whilst CEO pay has surged by over 900%? Why do you think there are caravans of people going to canada to buy insulin, so they, you know, dont die from being too poor to buy overpriced american insulin?
Deregulation isn't intended to choke big business and harm everyone. The primary intention is to protect the environment and the common people from the interests of large corporations, which are often at odds with both of them. Of course that will curtail profit or sometimes have negative consequences. But removing them will ensure a split of consequence. Positive for the rich, negative for everyone else. Sure there might be some more jobs, but they won't pay well, because the value of work is unilaterally set by the employer, with the employee having no say. A take it or leave it mentality is put into place, and when faced with earning little money with no way to rise through the ranks or no money, one of course takes option one. No financial security is still better than no finances at all.
The rest of the world is definitely looking at the US with a very worried gaze. Of course right-wing populists cheer, because they view the stripping away of rights and the unfettered pursuit of money as something praiseworthy, as well as getting to vote people against their own interest (see brexit, it'll be an economic disaster and likely re-ignite the civil war in northern ireland. But muh pride and independence. Sure.)
@UCvxfdtPqO5Y_XXv0wYE7FIQ True. Problem is, right now the US is cutting a lot of essential regulations - like emissions standards and other pollution related things, or financial regulations that were implemented to stop another financial crisis from re-occurring. Re-allowing stock buybacks also is contributing hugely to wealth inequality.
I agree that yes, some regulations could be choke holds, if implemented poorly etc or for the wrong reasons. But what is currently being thrown out by the US government is absolutely essential, and will only do two things. A) make the rich richer, B) make life for everyone who isn't rich worse.
I can verify that in Taiwan too.
Any rational person would know that climate regulations only hamper small businesses in exchange for very little result.
FACT CHECK: Wrong! Warm fuzzies and smugness are now down 53%.
@@Stevarooni FACT CHECK: Wrong! It is thanks to innovations in the free market, dumb-dumb.
In my college, the Dean of Sustainability said, "Government regulations do only the minimal to change environmental factors, entrepreneurs are the real driving force behind environmental change."
How sad but true, regulations world wide are used to halt competition among small businesses in the name of environment protection, where in reality we can make REAL regulations that can really stop pollution, tax the plastic industry if you want to protect the environment, subsidise concrete alternatives if you want to repair marine life.
When the massive corporations are for a regulation, you have to question it. Regulations pushed by corporations have been one of the largest drivers of shutting down small businesses. The big guys can absorb the cost while the little guys can't. Then the corporation gains market share and passes the cost to the consumer.
The EPA didnt even force cities to fix their dangerous water.
LA river is perfect example. Why people in California don't care about their waterways is beyond reason.
My conscience won't let me through garbage out anywhere.
People must not have a conscience for their environment.
But they'll show up on your property if it rains too much and fine you for it.
The government should control much less than it does now and I’m glad we’re headed in that direction
It all started when Congress started handing over the keys to these laws to the Executive Branch. The Executive Branch moves faster than Congress, and the only ones responsible to the people are the President and Vice President.
Regulations are unconstitutional by virtue of the fact that they are laws created by the Executive Branch. The Executive Branch does not have the power to create laws, just enforce/execute them.
This aged well.
@@genericprofile2381It's not over yet... Not just yet anyway...
Net neutrality was repealed my internet/cable went down $50. The HORROR of me paying less!.
M Row,
Indeed!,you selfish person you! Some poor CEO's kids are probably going to have to go without an upstairs swimming place at the summer place in the Hampton's,or some such heinous atrocity! How do you sleep at night! LOL!
Yup. The advancing technology of internet speed gives every website access to fast connections. There is no need for the government to get involved in the matter.
Same, my bill went down and my speed nearly tripled, was it related? I don't know but it sure as hell didn't kill the internet. The only thing doing harm to the internet currently is the companies who are censoring everyones opinions like mad
I am now paying half what I used to. I also used to only get 100mbps but now get 300mbps.
A lot of this is because of the expansion of fibre infrastructure. They can support such a ridiculous amount of bandwidth now. The fear with the repeal of net neutrality though is data caps, which are starting to appear now ever more frequently slowly but surely.
My internet speed is almost always throttled at the end of the month because I “use too much”. When you have speeds of 1000MB (aka 1 gigabyte a second second ) it is very easy to hit that 1 terabyte (1000 gigabyte) data cap and then they throttle you.
John Stossel is the only journalist left with a brain. He must get lonely sometimes.
Smaller more localized governing is better, always.
RoseThistleArtworks representation!
Because a bunch of guys in D.C don't know your problems. Your local government on the other hand might.
Yes
Imagine seeing the assholes who make corrupt laws in the supermarket every day.
Politicians who would have to stand with their backs turned, having to trust the people behind them in line to not hurt or kill them while they get groceries or get gas..
Those people would have to see the people they screw over every day and interact with them and maybe even have to deal with the people they screwed over so badly they became violent.
And the corruption would end much sooner from the politicians once they had to literally deal with the repercussions of their actions- positive or negative.
As they would have to stare those they rob and oppress In the face each day
Instead they hide in office buildings with armed security and laws that give them immunity from their criminal behavior and immunity from consequences of unconstitutional legislature.
Even better: Regardless of the size non-coercive government.
Localized government will know the issues that affect them more than one big government ever will. Especially with a country as big as the U.S.
Remember, no matter how justly and fairly a politician promises to rule you, make no mistake, they are still promising to RULE you.
I like your style, Cryptic Observer.
Thank you for showing a side of Trump's policies that we never see on the mainstream media.
I was always under the impression that the government’s function was to ensure that we are guaranteed life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, not to control us.
If you rely on government goons for anything, you will get everything. Like it or not.
No. You CAN rely on the government for some things, just not everything.
That's just a spin job. The purpose of the 'regulations' you demonize is to protect the life (osha, epa, fda, cwa, ntsa, faa, etc) liberty (Voting Rights Act, EPA again) and pursuit of happiness (ADA, Title IX, etc) of citizens that just don't happen to be YOU!
The libertarian wants the right to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater, ignoring the fact that while he may never wish to actually do that, there are many who would. Thus, the birth of the regulatory state.
If you really want less regulation, pressure the people and corporations who continually probe and push the boundaries of absolute legality looking for a way to profit at the expense of the people around them.
Government is people just like you, but they should aim to achieve what’s difficult for individuals and small groups.
As for happiness, my dear it’s within, no one can pursue something that’s inside !!
Pursuing Is almost like a dog chasing his tail.. lol 😂
Always behave humanly, otherwise you put yourself in a position where you need to be controlled.
@@roddaman7545 why cant i yell fire in a crowded theater if there is one? that issue is based off of truth. if its not true then they can pay for whatever harm they caused
How much money could be saved by abolishing most government agencies?
If there was no government not only would most of our incomes double, the value of that money would be over 25 TIMES what it is now just from inflation, the hidden tax, alone. (Thats only counting inflation from 1913 to 2018) The true cost of government to society is astronomical. Difficult to imagine just how much wealthier we'd all be without them.
@David Ringlein we give a lot of money to all countries
if we cut all funding to all 3rd world countries we could quickly stop the growth of debt
Israel just isn't 3rd world but they are a good ally to have in the middle east if terrorists become a problem again
Ever won money from the lotto before?
I’m sure you went and immediately put that $100-$1000 towards your mortgage or
car payment....
Oh what?
You mean you didn’t spend money you didn’t earn in a responsible manner?
I’ll be damned
Same goes for government
Trillions
Logan Waltz ha! Why not just continue to “raise the debt ceiling”? That’s govt for you!
Ask a private business owner about the ADA scams that screw them all year long.
I've learned more about Trump's presidency these past few weeks from this channel than I did from all other "news" outlets combined in the last four years.
I opened a small boarding home for the elderly. I went up against the nursing home industry. I had no idea! It was a nightmare!
Sir,
Thanks for posting and reporting, it doesn't go unnoticed. Well Done !
Stossel is my favorite. Such a good reporter.
"If you get your news from late night comedy shows, you think that de-regulation is bad for the economy and bad for the environment."
@Tucson Jim Let the free market take care of it. Put Hughes out of business. Don't let them regulate and pay the fines to pollute anyways.
If they didn’t over-regulate, we wouldn’t have to over-UN-regulate!
As someone who worked within the rules over EPA for nearly 14 years HAZMAT Certification, Shipping and Transportation as well as disposal of dangerous and explosive substances, I completely agree!
We were once fined by the EPA for emergency destruction on an EPA approved site for proper disposal of explosives over a period of decades... Fort Carson EOD was fined when we were unable to dispose of an emergency disposal operation on their time... We can't just determine when an emergency will arise!
It'd be like fining the fire department for not showing how to put out a fire to demonstrate it wasn't violating EPA by spreading hazardous materials with water. They'd literally need to set someone's property on fire to create a response! EPA is corrupt with power and known for its back-deals that end in pseudo bribery for special favors. I've seen people resign for the allegations alone.
Last I checked less government is a good thing, less money In their pocket and more in ours.
*Less regulation, less pit pocketing from our government*
Kenneth Bowers That money in your pocket isn’t yours, though. It’s the federal reserves. Without them your money is worthless and you’re going to have to go back to non fiat currency which would be the end of American influence in the world. The powers that be are not going to let that happen.
@Coelophysis It's RELATIVELY harmless. In relation to things like uh... alcohol.
Government in general loves rules..... They love rules because you have to break some of them and then they can penalize you and fine you and perhaps take your property.... it's all about control and always has been
@Logan Waltz Until said American runs into a stupid regulation that affects his own life.
As an independent I don’t have to agree with everything that President Trump says or does. But I’m a Capitalist, that’s why I will vote for him in 2020. Socialism will put 90% of this country in poverty.
@Real Chadxd We don't have a government. We're a *corporation.* If the *government* ever stopped lying about it they might be able to function...
@Real Chadxd In the language, in the laws of our nation, we are a corporation, owned and governed by boards of billionaires. It's our reality.
But we will all be equal. DEI for everyone.
"Rich corporate elite bad, rich government elite good"
The two groups collaborate more often than people realise
0:15 the guy who said america deserved 9/11 doesnt deserve an ounce of attention
The last of the real reporters, no fake news here. Thank you for another great report.
Do people harass you about your post picture?
Never really understood it but maybe you can explain...
#Trump2020
#ReallyWoke
#BlackAmericans4Trump
Kevin Dahlberg u never work in the news,you don’t have experience to justify your views
@@michaeljackson6107 It's a symbol of southern pride, most people know it has zero to do with hate or slavery but sadly the history has been rewrote and the narrative changed to push a agenda, when we forget history, change history, take down monuments we are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past. We are all American no matter race, sex or religion and our nations diversity and willingness to work together have made us great. I pray to god we never see another civil war but the two party system, identity politics, state rights, open borders and people who hate what America represents is tearing us apart.
@@MrMundo3d We all need to gather information from multiple sources and form a educated opinion on the information available. I agree with this news story and the numbers dont lie. If you do not see any bios in the media you are blind. John Stossel has been a reporter for more than a few years, he always represents both sides of the story, does not lie or make up facts and I have never seen him pass judgment or attack anybody he does not agree with. The man is what a reporter should be.
@@michaeljackson6107 I hope you dont mind, I would like to share this link with you that might help explain this flag. We are all in this together. MAGA2020
ua-cam.com/video/q1vQTMX2ELs/v-deo.html
Starting off the day right 💪
Great video! Thanks for real journalism. Best wishes
The sad thing is that the people that need to see this, wont see this
I have an idea for a new show: John Stossel ruins Adam ruins everything
Imagine having to have been required to buy health insurance
Justin Joy I remember that. I hated it.
I'm a registered member of the Caddo Nation.. I have "free universal healthcare" provided by the government and tax payers.. and guess what? I have a secondary insurance company as a backup incase the indian insuance takes too long for something major.. as it stands right now, for checkups on my children it's a 6 month wait.. for checkups on myself it's a year waiting list.. checkups aren't super important, but if that's the list just to check if I'm healthy or not.. think about the list for a major surgery or something..
Yea.. its "free".. would I recommend someone rely entirely on government run healthcare? Hell fucking no..
@@zinov3
If you ask Canadians about their free health care a lot of Us will tell you we just go to the states and fork up the cash.
@@SludgeManCometh it's funny you brought up leg amputation.
When My father first got the Gout his Doctor wanted to take his foot!!
Yeah second opinion on that one for sure...
Justin Joy Imagine getting sued by a hospital for your healthcare costs because you don’t have the means to cover your $400k bill for your heart surgery. You work a low paying job, so there is no hope of them recovering the debt from you. So, the hospital itself ends up eating the bill(collections agencies will make your life miserable but can’t draw blood from a turnip). Then, the hospital closes because too many schmoes like you think it’s cool to be a deadbeat. Your community loses a hospital that was professionally run to be replaced by a medical clinic. These places still rake your wallets, but give the shittiest care administered by some fresh off the plane Achmed or Abdul who has brought his whole clan over to facilitate the great replacement. You now have a joke for medical care in your community, but despite watching family and friends die from the most idiotic causes, you’ll never admit that keeping that hospital with fancy high paid doctors was worth the cost. Funerals are cheap and easy!
Think I’m lying? Go and visit any rural community out beyond last mile range in this country. Hospitals are closing left and right and the one stop med clinics are all over the place. Look on the map for where the latest mosques have opened. You’ll notice a pattern very quickly.
I wish they would deregulate diesel pickup trucks. The emissions systems are terrible. It's fun trying to haul horses across the Nebraska prairie on reduced power because the dpf is plugged. Milage is about half of what the old trucks were. Added $10,000 to the price tag.
I wish they would regulate dirty, smelly, toxic diesel engines off the face of the earth. I really do cough when I smell diesel fumes. I really don't give a F#$% about you hauling your hobby horses across Nebraska. Why aren't you riding them? It's a travesty that you haul in a trailer an animal designed specifically for traveling on its own four feet. And don't come complaining to me when you fail to maintain your DPF system and suffer the consequences as a result. No sympathy for you or your hobby.
@@dlwatib well if you knew how those systems work, the same things are still coming out of the tail pipe. All these systems do is raise the exhaust temperature up to 1000 degrees. If regen cycle starts you have to keep driving. On tier 4 tractors when regen cycle starts they run for about 45 minutes at full throttle. The dpf plug because that is what what they do. Milage has been cut just about in half. I tell me how an engine burning almost twice the fuel pollutes less. I wouldn't assume my horses are a hobby either.
Dan W you’ll have to excuse that idiot. Most likely a liberal that has never stepped out of the shithole city he lives in to even know what a diesel truck is, much less how it operates
@@irocksup123 also doesn't understand how the diesel engine has made his life better. His comment about my horses tell me he's probably never been near one. When the service manager in Nebraska tells me that when the warranty is over to delete the emissions I think that says it all. I was invited to a branding and the horses were there to get a job done if it really matters. Like I'm going to ride 900 miles instead of hauling them.
irocksup123 your right man liberals hate everything. He even said he hates horses so who really cares how he feels. I love Diesel engine pick up trucks haul stuff a lot better than gas engines and most of all longer engine life.
Thanks for posting what was repealed. Showing facts instead of emotion only is important.
Nice reporting Stossel.
He promised 2 for 1. Delivered at least 5 for 1. Winning!
0:18 it's so cringe to see a middle-aged man to misuse the word "literally" the way teenage girls do.
The hysteria after the "net neutrality" repeal was honestly one of the funniest things I have ever seen.
I noticed all the big youtubers shilling about how it was gonna destroy youtube and the internet quickly shut the hell up and never returned to the subject
And you can still get them to talk about it too. Like I was super for it. Then I literally read into it and was super not for it anymore.
There are shows on youtube thstvare getting shut down and they have changed their algorithms. So yes there has been some changes to the internet. I like John Stossel but if you fact check him you will find he is biased towrds the right.
The argument about net neutrality in this video is so wrong that make me question the validity of other arguments (which all of them I agree, but maybe I should pay a little more attention).
@@supersuperjhon So what is the correct argument then? That it DID destroy the internet? It was a set of crazy regulations from 1934 (Title II of the communications act of 34') that they slapped on the internet in order to have more control and supposedly protect against evil ISP throttling/blocking (which has never even happened in any serious manner), and took power away from a real regulatory agency, the FTC. Good on Ajit Pai and the Trump FCC for repealing Title II "net neutrality" regulations from the web.
Stay away from mainstream media they had their chance of honest journalism. Now leave it to John Stossel, Mark Dice and Next News Network.
Thank God for (the people left on) UA-cam- If it weren't for people spelling things out to me I could never understand this stuff, and I'd be in the dark.
Hey dont be so hard on yourself. You were smart enough to realize something is up and that one way or the other led you here so I think your better than most.
This is what’s sad about this. The lack of transparency and simplified language makes it difficult for most people to comprehend the laws and regulations that are being discussed and voted upon.
John story of how his lib friends disowned him after becoming libertarian but the right welcomed him says it all.
I love John Stossel. Just informative.
Stupid regulations stifle the country's growth. Great journalism John Stossel.
Thanks for more truth telling John!
3:00
"Handing the keys of the internet to a handful of multi-billion dollar corporations"
Like Facebook and Google right?
Or the other 4 websites on the internet.
Yeah, it's not like it was that way before net neutrality, either. The only difference is they aren't "their" people, meaning unelected bureaucrats.
zztop3000 the point is the same, the internet is effectively controlled by a few corporations.
@@thepope2412, and it was as much before net neutrality, yet none of those things had happened.
Or how about a Nevada power consumer can't even have cost effective Nuclear Energy due to NV Energy's (i.e. Warren Buffet's) "Natural Monopoly" on electricity. Oh well - there's always somewhere else.
3:58
Exactly! They are there to influence you emotionally with comedic satire.
The news should be a source of real information that allows YOU to form an opinion on your own!
I've been a Libertarian ever since I found out about Ron Paul a long time ago
Colorado went the same way as California a few days ago, making auto makers sell 5% electric cars, regardless of customer demand 🙃🤣
Colorado is very quickly becoming the new California. Over the last 10 years Colorado has made many terrible government-related decisions.
@Templar Only a relatively small number. Of everyone leaving Commifornia, only about 4% go to Colorado (raising Colorado's population by 0.5%). More popular destinations are Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and unfortunately Texas which is #1 on the list.
@Templar I'll come and sway the numbers a bit. I'm a proud conservative and not afraid to speak my opinion.
And that's why I'm SUPPORTING TRUMP! God bless AMERICA!!! ; ]
The problem with most regulations and laws is that somebody will find a loophole and new regulations/laws have to be added to fix the loophole. And then people find loopholes in the regulations/laws that are supposed to fix the loophole. Resulting in more new regulations/laws to fix the loopholes in the fixed loopholes. And so the cycle continues.
Kathy Sharp So...the bureaucracy must expand to meet the needs of the bureaucracy?
@Kathy Sharp Well, you have a good point. A lot of regulation is created just because the whole purpose of the legislative institution is to create new regulations.
I live in UK.... I love watching your news ... You’re so impartial...
When all the corrupt politicians and corrupt media tries to shut down a guy like they did Trump. Then I will vote for that guy every time.
When net neutrality was repealed, my ISP (tiny, family-run company on the WA coast) created a new premium offering: 200mbps down / 50mbps up + unlimited bandwidth. It isn’t cheap, but more than offset by cancelling DirecTV.
Daniel S sadly when I would bring up things like this when it was a hot button issue no one understood this could happen.
@Kathy Sharp but IPS's clients are already paying for their own google traffic. Google doesn't force their data into their users, the users ask for google's content. Also, when IPSs receive a google package, they charge the other ISP who passed that package to them. And in case you are wondering what is google paying, just because you want to see google losing some money, they pay their internet connection to the ISPs they are directly connected to. What if you build your own data center and people is Azerbaijan wants to access it, should you pay to their ISPs?
I want all those regulations back! I want Big Brother controlling my life, after all , the government know best and is looking out for me ( and thinking for me). I'm voting democrat 2020! NOT !!!
If ya vote=stupid cattle
Trump 2020 that's all I have to say about that
You might as well say "I'm a gullible crypto Commie who trusts a lying, self serving con man."
M Street ooooooh you sure got me, that's a good one
@@EdwardOrnelas oookay.
@Peg Leg Really?
Ok, then would you please point out "righteous" slave master Trump and "evil slave masters" Clintons in the quote below?
"If you wish to keep slaves, you must have all kinds of guards. The cheapest way to have guards is to have the slaves to pay taxes to finance their own guards. To fool the slaves, you tell them that they are not slaves and that they have freedom. You tell them that they need law and order to protect them from bad slaves, then you tell them to elect a government. Give them freedom to vote and they will vote for their own guards and pay their salary. They will then believe they are free persons. Then give them money to earn, count and spend and they will be too busy to notice the slavery they are in."
- Alexander Warbucks
@Peg Leg Since you mentioned the world "cartel," here is a fact for you.
ALL governments are nothing but criminal cartels with a monopoly on violence which they use to enslave humanity so your belief in a "righteous, non cartel" ruler like Trump and/or a "righteous side" is an absurdity.
"...the State is fundamentally an anti-social institution, fundamentally criminal. *The idea that the State originated to serve any kind of social purpose is completely unhistorical. It originated in conquest and confiscation - that is to say, in crime. It originated for the purpose of maintaining the division of society into an owning-and-exploiting class and a propertyless dependent class - that is, for a criminal purpose.*
*No State known to history originated in any other manner, or for any other purpose. Like all predatory or parasitic institutions, its first instinct is that of self-preservation. All its enterprises are directed first towards preserving its own life, and, second, towards increasing its own power and enlarging the scope of its own activity. For the sake of this it will, and regularly does, commit any crime which circumstances make expedient."*
Criminality of the State
mises.org/library/criminality-state
Is there anything else you'd like to say?
God bless Mr. President Trump and The United States of America.
I honestly believe Trump is the best thing that could've happened to our country.
I love John Stossel. From Philippines..
God bless John Stossel, and God bless America!
"if you get your news from late night shows" never better said, frigging leftists dominating the media. I honestly cried when stossel retired from Fox business, I'm glad he still does content for reason
Repeal the NFA. Any restriction is an infringement!
Thank you, Mr Stossel!
This kind of journalism is refreshing to see.
The last three lines are a perfect description of US government.
I love deregulation, but we must end corporate welfare...
Corporate welfare? What does that even mean?
@@kofola9145 most people how say it have no idea. It's just a buzzword.
@@kofola9145 Means corporations lobby the government officials to give them easier time.
@Bear Foxtrot I'm in total agreement with you on the bail outs, how many times have they bailed out the auto industry only to come back and do it again while as you say the executives still gave themselves enormous bonuses after filing for bankruptcy. These companies steadily increase the salary up top and then beg for government help, we have to start holding these companies responsible for their business dealings and get people that will operate the business as it should be run or get out. The Federal government is not there to bailout failed corporations, that only allows underhanded deals by politicians.
One of the reasons why Trump will get relected. If were going to recover from the next recession, we need to let the free market lift itself out of a slump and stop reckless government spending.
BWAHAHA.
Says "we need the free market" but supports Trump who uses ten planks of the Communist Manifesto policies to TAX and REGULATE the market.
Hint: TAXATION and Regulation= UNFREE market.
Strange how you magatards make the same fundamental mistake as Communists and Socialists in not knowing what a free market is.
John, you are a national treasure and should not be allowed to retire ! America needs you.
It seems that when a business wants to make or even keep its own money it is called greedy, but a politician who wants to raise taxes and impose job-killing regulations, they aren't called greedy. I see politicians as the real greedy people, they didn't earn that money and most of the crap they spend tax dollars on is a total waste.
Now only if Trump takes his hands off of the second amendment...
Exactly . I am with you .
Exactly what I thought
Su Nam (Kevin) Jang - I think he has come to his senses on that. I’m sure multiple people have pointed out the big issues with red flag laws. Or I hope they have....
For Trump, as a businessman, initially all options are on the table. Then you evaluate the pros and cons and go from there. As someone who has been relentlessly targeted by the media and democrats with false accusations, I hope Trump understands the very real danger of opening up backdoors for the liberals to use to rob all of us of our rights.
You mean bump stock and full auto? Me like that, just to ensure nobody bring a bunch of full auto into tall buildings again.
So basically by doing the exact opposite of what Obama was doing, Trump is making America great again. 👍
America *was* great. Now if you're one percent wealthy, yes, he's helping you. But 99 percent of us are not happy. Ninety nine percent. Plus the cult of ignorance.
@@miapdx503 I'm in the 99% and its helping me. I've also seen more help wanted signs and ads in the last year than I've seen in the last 35 years. So, maybe it is helping but the lazy people just cant be helped bc they are so used to hand outs.
@@conFIGuredAPK I myself have started getting raises again and lets not forget about getting $20 back in our paychecks after a few tax changes.
@@conFIGuredAPK that was some sanctimonious bullshit. Straight out of cult-speak. I'm done with you zombie.
@@miapdx503 wow that's crazy. All I was doing was stating what I've seen with my own eyes and benefits I myself am obtaining. No need to go crazy with calling names and acting that way. Why not state an opinion and have a discussion?
I loved the sentence "If you get your news from late night comedy shows" so well put
Fantastic reporting, as always. So glad I started watching Stossel’s videos. Gives me hope for the future of journalism
This is how non bias journalism works. Excellent report.
When you pause a Joe Rogan video because John just uploaded.
It's been a long, LONG time since I've listened to the MSM about laws, regulations, or anything realistic.
Just walked out a coffee shop where news slamming trumps deregulation.
Tucson Jim
Good point. Not all regulation is bad and anyone who says so, is delusional.
One thing noted in the is that is not pushed to the front enough. Too many regulations produce contradictory regulations. One agency says do this or you get fined, another says do the opposite or you get fined.
☑️stuck at home last spring, so I kept hearing so much about Trump, checked out books on economics from the library in order to follow along. Gotta say, it changed my mind about him...
We need only to regulate the useless politics. Start with there pay. 1 term and done etc etc
Doug Wolf Corporations won’t be able to get their men in power by fooling the voters if you do that. Lots of pissed off guys motivated by money will not be pleased.
how is it that Republicans hate government. but always uses the government to benefit them. and not fixing anything that brings wealth to the middle class American people. and mitch McConnell lies about everything
just like president trump. to destroy anything that helps our country move forward. social security benefits is being DESTROYED by the elites.
rather than to put the money's back that thay borrowed from it.
without our consent. we that where born in 1955 will receive less than someone born in 1954 is bull. I worked 2 sometimes 3 jobs to stay in place as middle class.
so mean wile having to leave the work place at age 62 to take care of my wife that's suffering from altimmers. and dont receive any extra money's for doing the caring
for her .and needed to move out of state because New York state rents are so overpriced that social security benefits do not cover the expenses nor my retirement. and paying out of retirement health care is over 1000.00 a month.its time to change those individuals
that are in Congress that make everyone's life a living hell.
those individuals don't have a clue what thay are doing. so I and my wife should just bite the bullet
and make them happy. so f y s
2020 will be the pay back .can't come soon enough.
0:17 Didn't know the Young Turks had a bizzaro Steven Crowder
To be fair Stossel, that "Six Major Pollutants" graph was vague af
Yeah. Didn't say six most common pollutants, so they could easily be hand picked
Thank you John. You are one of the journalists that are still real
John Stossel's the man!
5G Internet Infrastructure exempted from environmental review. O that sounds like a great idea! NOT
I think a Health Review on how 5G effects the human body is needed...as well as a National Security review on if foreign powers can easily use 5G to hack into American devices.
Well it doesn’t really matter since their environmental reviews are a farce anyway. Environmental reviews have found wind turbines to be “safe” and get the green light but there are numerous studies worldwide showing this isn’t the case for many birds and mammals (and likely people) I don’t think they’ve even conducted studies on how wind farms could potentially affect natural vegetation although several studies have shown adverse effects on gardening/farming. The government did an environmental review of the Keystone XL pipeline and found it was fine and then turned right around redid it and found it’s going to single handedly destroy the planet. These reviews and regulations are only as good as the agencies conducting them and they are pretty much all corrupted either by ideology or money. In one small town where I lived you had to get a permit to build a doghouse because they were worried about how that could affect rain run off because it was in a flood zone. Of course you could buy one of the plastic or premade ones that was three times the size of the one you wanted to build and no permit was necessary....
@@TGuard00014 I've been told the 5G technology was developed for crowd control by the Military. What could go wrong with that ?
I'm happy about the Tariffs on China. In the long run it will be a good thing. Companies will move to other places instead of a manipulating dictatorship.
Hmmmm. The '5G infrastructure removed from environmental review' sees alarming. Does that include studying its health effects? This demands more investigation!
I appreciate you John!
I'd love to see an episode on building permits and the cost to home owners and businesses. Constitutional right to own property but you have to get the govts permission to live on it. Absurd!