YUP!! I concur!! I grew up in the 70s and my male favorites were Rod Laver, Bjorn Borg, then Pete Sampras. All 3 were about the tennis. No theatrics. Elegant. Smooth. ICONIC!!
For me, there will never be another Sampras. As a kid a saw him play and he's the best player I had the honor to witness. Best player in tennis history
I agree that it's not terribly productive to compare athletes from different eras. Technology changes, tactics change, rules change, and there's no accounting for the relative quality of a given athlete's opponents. What is clear is that, in his prime, Pete Sampras was the most successful tennis player of his era.
I got to see Pete Sampras play Marat Safin in Toronto back in the day. My dad worked for Newsweek and he snuck me in lol. I became a fan of tennis right then and there.
If it wasn't for Pete I would have never picked up a racket. 1996 and I was 9 yrs old all I did was practice my serve from morning til night. Thanks Pete you will always be #1
Cascão same here, for me he will always remain no. 1. For his ever elegant and powerful way of playing, and not the least, his gentlemanly behavior. Thanks Pete.
I remember watching Pete in his later years. I think I was around 14 at the time (31 now). His serve, backhand and volley just blew me away. His crushing second serve aces were awe inspiring. I finally took up tennis 3 years ago and people like Sampras, Federer, Nadal and Murray give me inspiration when I'm in a slump. Watching how they move and there effortless power and precision makes me strive to be a better player. Thanks for the memories Pete :-)
I firmly believe that Pete at his peak is the best player I have ever seen, and I say this without every really having been a fan as such. His main problem was that his consistency was not that great, but when he was "on" he was simply the best ever.
@@ais6863 I think he's talking about Pete's performances at GS. Unlike the big three or older greats like Ivan Lendl and Jimmy Connors he didn't make it to every semifinal for five years. But he had this star quality about him which meant that he could win if he really wanted to.
@@Ultimate.Tennis I agree w/ your take in general. There were also so many more different ways to win in the 90s, w/ how much more different the surfaces were, playing styles, graphite technology was in effect, but more so just the elementary version of the metal post-wooden racquets, w/o the strings to return crazy spins against great shots, and from awkward positions like there is now. There were a lot more different players in the top-20, capable of winning a major if the surface suited them, they got the style-draw they wanted, and if they were just playing 80-90% to their best; and if then the great they were facing in a later round had a mildly off-day. But no, Pete wasn't the most consistent, definitely not like a Federer or Borg, as it prevented him from winning the 17-19, high teens majors that he would've needed to put himself in GOAT talks. I didn't think he had come into his own yet when he won the 90 US Open, but I didn't think I'd take him a another 3yrs to win his 2nd major. He had a good to very good, but not great all-court game, and he needed to be having a dominating serving day to set it up.
@@arsonhakobyan I generally agree. But I think if Pete had a bigger record to break than Emerson's 12 GS, he would have stayed motivated after getting his 13th slam and not had his early 2000s slump before winning his last major and retiring at 14. He would have been motivated and played for significantly longer than he actually did.
His play was so perfekt and beautiful! How he played backhand!!! For me he is the best. I am still missing. Unfortunately I couldn't see his play live....
What a beautiful life and story! Love Pete when he was competing and loved him when it all ended. A wonderful human being all around and the greatest tennis player ever.
I remember watching Pete Sampris play Agassi when I was a high school student. I had nothing to do that weekend and was trying to find something to do. I noticed on TV they were having some kind of tennis championship (don't know if it was Wimbledon or what) but I watched it and was in awe of how good this kid was. I didn't know anything about tennis but even I could say what a beast he was on that court!
Pete is a truly blessed human being. He deserves all the goodness in life that comes his way. I have so many wonderful memories watching him play tennis. Hope he will still be involved with professional tennis in some way. All the best Pete.
Beautiful video. I wasn't a fan of Pete's, but of course admired his determination and was amazed by his record. This video is a wonderful and personal view of the man, as well as the tennis legend. Great respect for his integrity, his dedication and talent. Happy life ahead to you, Mr. Sampras :-)
Loved watching Pete Sampras play. Any tennis tournament with Sampras and either of the Williams sisters in the finals was must-see tennis like no other event.
Amazing tennis player. I think people will eventually realize that tennis is way more enjoyable when they stop bashing on players that are rivals of their own "favorite" player and just watch and enjoy what these people can produce.
Pete would win on grass of the 1990's. Wimbledon changed the type of grass used to make the surface slower after 2000. You would hardly ever see baseliners win Wimbledon unless your name was Agassi or ? That's about it.
no Sampras is the king of tennis no one will ever again be 7-0 undefeated in Wimbledon finals and 14-4 in all slam finals in the strongest era......pete was truly complete. read em and weep 6 straight years as year end #1 Federer wont be doing that.
Federer has won a record eight Wimbledon titles, a record six Australian Open titles, a record five consecutive US Open titles, and one French Open title. He is one of eight men to have captured a career Grand Slam. Federer has reached a record 30 men's singles Grand Slam finals, including 10 in a row from the 2005 Wimbledon Championships to the 2007 US Open (and 18 out of 19 from the 2005 Wimbledon Championships to the 2010 Australian Open). He reached the semifinals at 23 consecutive Grand Slam tournaments, from the 2004 Wimbledon Championships through the 2010 Australian Open.[3] Federer has won 97 career titles, including six ATP World Tour Finals, 27 ATP World Tour Masters 1000, and 20 ATP World Tour 500 tournaments. Given these achievements, many players and analysts consider Federer to be the greatest tennis player of all time with some calling him the greatest athlete of his generation....
You're kidding right. You call an era where serve and volley dominated as the strongest era? You call a player who can serve and volley as complete? Come on. Use your brain. Roger dominated in a game where you can not serve and volley without getting destroyed. He played against Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Wawrinka, while Pete played against either washed up greats or two great players being Jim and Andre. Roger ended up as year end number 1 more than pete? Who cares if you dominate straight rather than throughout a long period of time. Roger has the most weeks number one and it isnt even close.
I am upset that I was not able to witness Pete and other legends in the 80's/90's. It would've been amazing to follow tennis at that time, then to see Federer, Nadal etc. Pete has the best serve ever, I believe it all comes from his confidence. Nowadays its just brutal baseline rallies. I think we will see in the future that tennis players' careers will be cut short because of this. ATP needs to make courts faster so that the definition of tennis doesn't change to 'cage fight' -.- lol
It wasn't his first though, which was among the best. It was his second, hands down best second serve the game has seen. And unlike an Ivanisavic or a Karlovic he had a great game to follow it up with.
Gotta have Borg ahead of Nadal, if Borg hadn't quit at 25 he'd probably be the best all time, but I'd say Pete then Federer then Borg. Pete is better then Federer just because his competition was better in my opinion.
Considering the brilliant Boris Becker serves came before Pete's rise to the top, it is a testimony to his superb heavy hitting seemingly almost 'through' the ball that the Tennis regulators felt the need to alter the tennis balls to make the game slower right around the time of Pete's dominance.
I love Pete. He is and will always be my favorite male athlete of all time! I remember watching the 1990 us open final. It was AWESOME! Pete no matter what you are MY GOAT!
I absolutely hated when they called him boring. Here was a genius, the very best tennis player at the time ever, and he was decimated by the most offensive possible thing you could call his magical game, that of being boring. He was a true role model for players and children, and adults for that matter, alike, yet nothing could satiate the recalcitrant media from its deeply offensive diatribe.
his big serving and volley style made it look too easy compared to the dramatic baseline rallies that were becoming common due to the rise of the baseliner with guys like Agassi.
Pete was the one who got me to like tennis and I stopped watching after he retired. I started watching again last year and liked Roger. I like how they are so quiet and graceful.
So what I'm trying to say is that not all numbers or statistics say GOAT without the hint of a doubt. But, he certainly is among them, that's for sure. I just like Pete's S&V style better but that's my personal preference, not saying he was the more complete player.
Shame they can't make a programme anymore without blasting music throughout it. You can't even hear an interview now without music, that puts me off even watching this.
DEXTER941 ya, I agree completely with you. They non tennis doc makers don't realise that the watchers might actually be jnterested in watching it and don't require dramatic music.
Loved Pete Sampras! Despite all the media telling us to love Andre, Sampras was my guy! Always rooted for him against Andre. Now I'm a Djoko fan. Really pleased how much Djoko has so respectful towards Pete. 👏👏
More GS winners because there weren't two dominant figures for half the decade like there was from 2005-2010. And from 1990-1999, there were 15 different Slam winners to 14 different Slam winners from 2000-2009. 9 multi-Slam winners from 90-99, 7 from 2000-2009.
I felt bad for Andre Agassi. No matter how good he played, Pete always found another level, just because it was Andre, it seemed. Pete would rather die than lose to Andre, it seemed.
Why? Agassi was a victim of his circumstances sure but so is everybody else. He turned out just fine, maybe I've been thru a crap ton too in a sense/ know I can only imagine the monumental pressures that come with one wrong misquote or movement lingering with your name for the rest of your career. Seriously, it ain't natural and the amount of destressing that must have occured behind the scenes just be ginormous. Also he's far from perfect- if read Patrick Mcenroe's book he clearly enjoys the finer ways of life the big money provides, not just earning big money for the kiddos, but can you blame him tho? This world revolves around perceptions instead of actual damage done vs. costs, it's insane, and far impossible from redemption probably from near the inception of lots of things years and years ago.... but what can we do except what you must to guard the most precious gifts we have- our family, sanity, or whatever other delicate things we treasure most? Edit: actually come to think of it, Bjorn Borg knew all about the life away from the pro tennis spotlight. Oh yeah, it broke him for sure (at least once upon a time, but nobody is truly an angel I get that lol)
@@Dman9fp Yeah, Agassi got paid well to say a line on TV for Rebel cameras, "Image is everything." A play on words for a camera, a picture is an "image." But people held that line against him for decades, saying it was a cheap philosophy of life, putting image over substance. It was unfair and mean.
@@DexterHaven If you ever have the chance to read his book, much harder time he had with his Dad practically forcing him to excel at tennis when he just wanted to be a kid. Definitely not the way to go, even in the very exceptionally rare case it may work. To each their own tho
@@danilo8088 No there isnt cause great tennis isnt defined by number of weeks and trophies. It is defined by the quality of the play. And if u think that only federer plays great u are deluded. There can be and are more then one of legends
@@danilo8088 Exactly and there can only be one Sampras. Both are legends why? Not because they have many grand slames. Its because they play great tennis. Thank you for seeing my point :)
great documentary on pete. kudos to the director. very well made. pete, is definitely the best player ever till date. Until I saw this documentary, never realized that so much went in Sampras's mind. it looked always easy on court and I felt he totally dominated and his opponents didn't have any chance at all. krajicek was lucky to win the 97 Wimbledon and Agassi, the 95 Australian open.
Sampras to me is the best men's player to ever play and had a serve like a major league pitcher. And in my opinion had the tougher competition then Federer had.
Between 2002 and 2011, Federer was dealing with Agassi, Hewitt, Roddick, Nalbandian, Safin, Davydenko, Haas, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Berdych, del Potro, Soderling, Tsonga, Blake. It only appears like Federer played in a weaker time because he was so good and he was so far above everyone except Nadal on clay between 2004 and 2007 that he made great players look average by beating them so much.
Agassi(was 33+ years old and decline), Hewitt, Roddick, Nalbandian, Tsonga, Blake, Davydenko, ( you're kidding me right) Safin( played two good tournaments in that entire period and was mostly injured), Djokovic, Murray, Del Potro, Soderling, Berdych ( only good from 2008 on aka the years he stopped winning titles), in all those players his only real competition was Nadal on clay and in a limited basis on Wimbledon, he had cake walks on the hard courts meaning two grand slams a masters cup and 6 masters series in the year. Federer's era was by far the weakest era in Men's tennis, nothing you say can change that.
To me THE greatest player ever. His prime level was unparalleled, unmatchable. With or without FO. And fuck the clay anyway, it is a different game than tennis. His GS and No1 records are broken, but so are the Schwarzenegger's or Senna's. Coleman and Haney have 8 Olympias, Schumacher has more titles than Ayrton. But when the question who's is the greatest comes up, people always say Arnold and Senna.
also back then there were more specialists like muster, chang, brugera etc....were great at the french, whereas now u really only have nadal who is a true specialist at the french, also back then u had grass court specialists like henman, rafter ivanisevic....who now is exceptional on grass, apart from federer, nadal? there arent many "specialists"
AS far as the media situation with Pete, i think the real issue is that Pete was conservative and the media never puffs up a conservative. MUhammad Ali was agreat fighter but he was puffed up by the media far beyong what he deserves because he was a counter-culture figure. He was a Muslim and a draft dodger so the media loved him and puffed him up relebtlessly. Pete got the opposite treatment.
Retired very early in comparison to modern players. He also used a racket that he didn't want to "upgrade" or change for a better modern one. Making me wonder if he played on, just for a couple of years more, how many titles would he have won? Either way, seems like not just a great player, but a good family man.
tennis greats have already said that this era is one of the greatest and toughest with RF, Rafa, Djoko , Murray, Potro 5 slam winners 3 of them having 33 between them never happened before in any era beating every other guy and winning for 8 years since 04... we are not talking about 1 or 2 years 8 years on we will never see domination like this by the big 3 they are class apart...
Easy. Modern racquet & technology, as well as the agregious slowing of most courts. Racquets and strings are going to constantly evolve, but the courts speeds could vary from really fast to really slow, so that we could see different styles of play that actually wins tournaments.
Greatest Serve in Tennis history. Period.
I couldn't agree with u more...MJ of tennis...
YUP!! I concur!! I grew up in the 70s and my male favorites were Rod Laver, Bjorn Borg, then Pete Sampras. All 3 were about the tennis. No theatrics. Elegant. Smooth. ICONIC!!
For me, there will never be another Sampras. As a kid a saw him play and he's the best player I had the honor to witness. Best player in tennis history
i feel ya ! best champion ever
I agree that it's not terribly productive to compare athletes from different eras. Technology changes, tactics change, rules change, and there's no accounting for the relative quality of a given athlete's opponents. What is clear is that, in his prime, Pete Sampras was the most successful tennis player of his era.
still the greatest champion. non nonsense, no drama, no BS.. just straight up awesome tennis
I got to see Pete Sampras play Marat Safin in Toronto back in the day. My dad worked for Newsweek and he snuck me in lol. I became a fan of tennis right then and there.
If it wasn't for Pete I would have never picked up a racket. 1996 and I was 9 yrs old all I did was practice my serve from morning til night. Thanks Pete you will always be #1
Me too!
I am going to pick up one NOWW.
Beautiful comment. I love you.
Cascão same here, for me he will always remain no. 1. For his ever elegant and powerful way of playing, and not the least, his gentlemanly behavior. Thanks Pete.
Pete - Andre - Jim - Michael quite a period for US men's tennis
Goran Ivancivic Yevgeny Kafelnilov Thomas Muster Gustavo Kuerten Series Bruguera Thoma Enquist Pat Rafter Richard Krijeck I can go on
the greatest serve ever
I don't care who came before or after, Pete will always be my favorite player of all time.
You have good tase. 🏆🏆🙂
Thank you Pete!
You make me proud to be of Greek heritage!
He's the greatest .The competition he had then was much better
Way better
I love Pete, but that's not true.
I remember watching Pete in his later years. I think I was around 14 at the time (31 now). His serve, backhand and volley just blew me away. His crushing second serve aces were awe inspiring. I finally took up tennis 3 years ago and people like Sampras, Federer, Nadal and Murray give me inspiration when I'm in a slump. Watching how they move and there effortless power and precision makes me strive to be a better player. Thanks for the memories Pete :-)
Pete Sampras greatest of all time...No matter what others say...
all the memories... Thank you Pete, you inspired me and many others.
No hookers, no meth labs in the desert, no Las Vegas 3-day gambling benders. Just clean livin'. That's Pete.
And that’s fun for you? No adrenaline , no breaking the rules, no fun at all
LMAO to funny.
Agassi suckis
Agassi literally was outplaying a peak Federer at 35 before the back went. Sampras lost to a baby Fed on his favorite court lol
@gmellias Junkie? What evidence do you have for that rude, phony smear? Says a lot about you.
Pete Sampras = why you started loving Tennis
Love you forever, Sir 🙏💛
🐐
This gave me chills, Pete is by far my favorite player of all time
the legend... the greatest second server.... the player that can serve the second serve faster than the first serve
I firmly believe that Pete at his peak is the best player I have ever seen, and I say this without every really having been a fan as such.
His main problem was that his consistency was not that great, but when he was "on" he was simply the best ever.
consistency not great? record 6 years in a row year-end number 1... plus 2nd all-time number of weeks at number 1... that's pretty consistent lol
You are right sir
@@ais6863 I think he's talking about Pete's performances at GS. Unlike the big three or older greats like Ivan Lendl and Jimmy Connors he didn't make it to every semifinal for five years. But he had this star quality about him which meant that he could win if he really wanted to.
@@Ultimate.Tennis I agree w/ your take in general. There were also so many more different ways to win in the 90s, w/ how much more different the surfaces were, playing styles, graphite technology was in effect, but more so just the elementary version of the metal post-wooden racquets, w/o the strings to return crazy spins against great shots, and from awkward positions like there is now. There were a lot more different players in the top-20, capable of winning a major if the surface suited them, they got the style-draw they wanted, and if they were just playing 80-90% to their best; and if then the great they were facing in a later round had a mildly off-day. But no, Pete wasn't the most consistent, definitely not like a Federer or Borg, as it prevented him from winning the 17-19, high teens majors that he would've needed to put himself in GOAT talks. I didn't think he had come into his own yet when he won the 90 US Open, but I didn't think I'd take him a another 3yrs to win his 2nd major. He had a good to very good, but not great all-court game, and he needed to be having a dominating serving day to set it up.
@@arsonhakobyan I generally agree. But I think if Pete had a bigger record to break than Emerson's 12 GS, he would have stayed motivated after getting his 13th slam and not had his early 2000s slump before winning his last major and retiring at 14. He would have been motivated and played for significantly longer than he actually did.
His play was so perfekt and beautiful! How he played backhand!!! For me he is the best. I am still missing.
Unfortunately I couldn't see his play live....
Thanks Pete!
What a beautiful life and story! Love Pete when he was competing and loved him when it all ended. A wonderful human being all around and the greatest tennis player ever.
you're right the toughest era.....is pete's era
i cried hot tears watching this
Pete Sampras and Martina Hingis are the reason why tennis is the only sport I have ever consistently watched throughout the years.
He truly has the most emotional rise to the top of tennis. After watching this im concinced hes the greatest player to ever play tennis
I remember watching Pete Sampris play Agassi when I was a high school student. I had nothing to do that weekend and was trying to find something to do. I noticed on TV they were having some kind of tennis championship (don't know if it was Wimbledon or what) but I watched it and was in awe of how good this kid was. I didn't know anything about tennis but even I could say what a beast he was on that court!
Pete is a truly blessed human being. He deserves all the goodness in life that comes his way. I have so many wonderful memories watching him play tennis. Hope he will still be involved with professional tennis in some way. All the best Pete.
The legend idolised and started watching tennis. It's Pistal Pete!!That serve, that running forehand..Wow..the best player ever
Beautiful video. I wasn't a fan of Pete's, but of course admired his determination and was amazed by his record. This video is a wonderful and personal view of the man, as well as the tennis legend. Great respect for his integrity, his dedication and talent. Happy life ahead to you, Mr. Sampras :-)
Sampras is the MAN!!! Best ever!
the fact sampras strung his racquets in the mid 70's and still won championships is incredible
Pete, you were, and are my Idol! Not just best Tennis player of all time, but a true man! Thanks!
Loved watching Pete Sampras play. Any tennis tournament with Sampras and either of the Williams sisters in the finals was must-see tennis like no other event.
Sampras is an amazing player I enjoyed watching him win his 7 Wimbledon titles.
Amazing tennis player. I think people will eventually realize that tennis is way more enjoyable when they stop bashing on players that are rivals of their own "favorite" player and just watch and enjoy what these people can produce.
Muster, rafter, edberg, becker, stich, moya, rios, rusedski, agassi, chang, courier, ivanisevic, haas, kafelnikov, corretja, krajicek.....LOADS of players :)
Rios
sampras is the best. love yo pistol pete.
great doc, thanks for the upload, my favourite player ever.
Sampras is best!!! Federer has more slams and better record but if they played in Wimbledon both at their best I would vote for Sampras.
That is a bit tough because of their different styles. It would be a close match either way
Pete would win on grass of the 1990's. Wimbledon changed the type of grass used to make the surface slower after 2000. You would hardly ever see baseliners win Wimbledon unless your name was Agassi or ? That's about it.
Very true. Changing the court made serve and volley extinct
Fed would win more often, in fact most of the time. Sampras was so poor at returning.
I agree.
The best athletes are those who know when it's time to quit and they'll do it while still a champion 🏆
He was the greatest, classiest tennis player of all-time
Edward Asamen na, Sampras was great, Federer is the GOAT.
no Sampras is the king of tennis no one will ever again be 7-0 undefeated in Wimbledon finals and 14-4 in all slam finals in the strongest era......pete was truly complete. read em and weep 6 straight years as year end #1 Federer wont be doing that.
Federer has won a record eight Wimbledon titles, a record six Australian Open titles, a record five consecutive US Open titles, and one French Open title. He is one of eight men to have captured a career Grand Slam. Federer has reached a record 30 men's singles Grand Slam finals, including 10 in a row from the 2005 Wimbledon Championships to the 2007 US Open (and 18 out of 19 from the 2005 Wimbledon Championships to the 2010 Australian Open). He reached the semifinals at 23 consecutive Grand Slam tournaments, from the 2004 Wimbledon Championships through the 2010 Australian Open.[3] Federer has won 97 career titles, including six ATP World Tour Finals, 27 ATP World Tour Masters 1000, and 20 ATP World Tour 500 tournaments. Given these achievements, many players and analysts consider Federer to be the greatest tennis player of all time with some calling him the greatest athlete of his generation....
You're kidding right. You call an era where serve and volley dominated as the strongest era? You call a player who can serve and volley as complete? Come on. Use your brain. Roger dominated in a game where you can not serve and volley without getting destroyed. He played against Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Wawrinka, while Pete played against either washed up greats or two great players being Jim and Andre. Roger ended up as year end number 1 more than pete? Who cares if you dominate straight rather than throughout a long period of time. Roger has the most weeks number one and it isnt even close.
Greatest champion hard working dedicated and sincere pete yohu re the best goorans fan from zagreb
i love u my super pete..greatest ever..
I am upset that I was not able to witness Pete and other legends in the 80's/90's. It would've been amazing to follow tennis at that time, then to see Federer, Nadal etc.
Pete has the best serve ever, I believe it all comes from his confidence. Nowadays its just brutal baseline rallies. I think we will see in the future that tennis players' careers will be cut short because of this. ATP needs to make courts faster so that the definition of tennis doesn't change to 'cage fight' -.- lol
It wasn't his first though, which was among the best.
It was his second, hands down best second serve the game has seen.
And unlike an Ivanisavic or a Karlovic he had a great game to follow it up with.
My personal top 3 tennis players of all time: Number one Pete Sampras. Number two Roger Federer. Number 3 Rafael Nadal.
Good list. But Nadal is the opposite kind of player than Federer or Sampras.
Gotta have Borg ahead of Nadal, if Borg hadn't quit at 25 he'd probably be the best all time, but I'd say Pete then Federer then Borg. Pete is better then Federer just because his competition was better in my opinion.
Considering the brilliant Boris Becker serves came before Pete's rise to the top, it is a testimony to his superb heavy hitting seemingly almost 'through' the ball that the Tennis regulators felt the need to alter the tennis balls to make the game slower right around the time of Pete's dominance.
I love Pete. He is and will always be my favorite male athlete of all time! I remember watching the 1990 us open final. It was AWESOME! Pete no matter what you are MY GOAT!
The summer 1999 Sampras may have been his best level of tennis.
narrator on this doc is just superb 👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽
The real goat. Lethal serve and volley
One of the greatest. Once "the best of all time". He do one thing that not many knows how to do it: when stop...when is enough
I absolutely hated when they called him boring. Here was a genius, the very best tennis player at the time ever, and he was decimated by the most offensive possible thing you could call his magical game, that of being boring. He was a true role model for players and children, and adults for that matter, alike, yet nothing could satiate the recalcitrant media from its deeply offensive diatribe.
Exactly, l made a similar comment.
Everyone who dominates a sport is called boring unless you're Micheal Jordan.
his big serving and volley style made it look too easy compared to the dramatic baseline rallies that were becoming common due to the rise of the baseliner with guys like Agassi.
You know, when RF was younger and Pete was on his way out, they had a big match at Wimbledon where Federer won in 5 sets. Both great players
Pistol Pete A tennis Warrior.. Magnific..
Pete was the one who got me to like tennis and I stopped watching after he retired. I started watching again last year and liked Roger. I like how they are so quiet and graceful.
the guy who made tennis
Yes. I remember where I was when I watched every round
Legend............
I always admired him for being himself, to hell with what society and media expects of ya on or off the court.
The best there was. Forever is, Sampras!
the best there was,the best there ever will be
So what I'm trying to say is that not all numbers or statistics say GOAT without the hint of a doubt.
But, he certainly is among them, that's for sure.
I just like Pete's S&V style better but that's my personal preference, not saying he was the more complete player.
The Pistol!
El genio Pete Sampras inspiró a las futuras generaciones de estrellas del tenis👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Sampras era much more tougher dude...sampras is the GOAT..
Shame they can't make a programme anymore without blasting music throughout it. You can't even hear an interview now without music, that puts me off even watching this.
DEXTER941 ya, I agree completely with you. They non tennis doc makers don't realise that the watchers might actually be jnterested in watching it and don't require dramatic music.
Loved Pete Sampras! Despite all the media telling us to love Andre, Sampras was my guy! Always rooted for him against Andre. Now I'm a Djoko fan. Really pleased how much Djoko has so respectful towards Pete. 👏👏
More GS winners because there weren't two dominant figures for half the decade like there was from 2005-2010. And from 1990-1999, there were 15 different Slam winners to 14 different Slam winners from 2000-2009. 9 multi-Slam winners from 90-99, 7 from 2000-2009.
Sampras was the best..and there will be no one who can ever beat him. He's the greatest
I can name 3....
Can't we enjoy this without discussing who the GOAT is. Let's just say that there are a lot of tennis greats.
I felt bad for Andre Agassi. No matter how good he played, Pete always found another level, just because it was Andre, it seemed. Pete would rather die than lose to Andre, it seemed.
Why? Agassi was a victim of his circumstances sure but so is everybody else. He turned out just fine, maybe I've been thru a crap ton too in a sense/ know I can only imagine the monumental pressures that come with one wrong misquote or movement lingering with your name for the rest of your career. Seriously, it ain't natural and the amount of destressing that must have occured behind the scenes just be ginormous. Also he's far from perfect- if read Patrick Mcenroe's book he clearly enjoys the finer ways of life the big money provides, not just earning big money for the kiddos, but can you blame him tho? This world revolves around perceptions instead of actual damage done vs. costs, it's insane, and far impossible from redemption probably from near the inception of lots of things years and years ago.... but what can we do except what you must to guard the most precious gifts we have- our family, sanity, or whatever other delicate things we treasure most?
Edit: actually come to think of it, Bjorn Borg knew all about the life away from the pro tennis spotlight. Oh yeah, it broke him for sure (at least once upon a time, but nobody is truly an angel I get that lol)
@@Dman9fp Yeah, Agassi got paid well to say a line on TV for Rebel cameras, "Image is everything." A play on words for a camera, a picture is an "image." But people held that line against him for decades, saying it was a cheap philosophy of life, putting image over substance. It was unfair and mean.
@@DexterHaven If you ever have the chance to read his book, much harder time he had with his Dad practically forcing him to excel at tennis when he just wanted to be a kid. Definitely not the way to go, even in the very exceptionally rare case it may work. To each their own tho
14 Grand slams, 7 wimbledon titles - 1 Legend
20 slams,8 wimbledon ,310 weeks nb one 98titles-There is only one legend...
@@danilo8088 No there isnt cause great tennis isnt defined by number of weeks and trophies. It is defined by the quality of the play. And if u think that only federer plays great u are deluded. There can be and are more then one of legends
@@milostopalovic9765 There is only one Federer
@@danilo8088 Exactly and there can only be one Sampras. Both are legends why? Not because they have many grand slames. Its because they play great tennis. Thank you for seeing my point :)
Best of the bests
Phil Agassi and Gus Sampras played a huge role in the success of their brothers.
Agreed. People seem to forget that a lot.
great documentary on pete. kudos to the director. very well made. pete, is definitely the best player ever till date. Until I saw this documentary, never realized that so much went in Sampras's mind. it looked always easy on court and I felt he totally dominated and his opponents didn't have any chance at all. krajicek was lucky to win the 97 Wimbledon and Agassi, the 95 Australian open.
How were they lucky? Krajicek won in 1996 by the way.
@@SonateSonate only time someone could beat pete during that time. Rare occurrence.
Sampras to me is the best men's player to ever play and had a serve like a major league pitcher. And in my opinion had the tougher competition then Federer had.
Tremendous player. Period
you'd think after 12 years on tour and numerous tests, Nadal would have tested positive for PEDs by now, don't you think.
Pete, greatest American champion. But never could do it at the French Open on the red clay of Roland Garos.
Between 2002 and 2011, Federer was dealing with Agassi, Hewitt, Roddick, Nalbandian, Safin, Davydenko, Haas, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Berdych, del Potro, Soderling, Tsonga, Blake. It only appears like Federer played in a weaker time because he was so good and he was so far above everyone except Nadal on clay between 2004 and 2007 that he made great players look average by beating them so much.
Agassi(was 33+ years old and decline), Hewitt, Roddick, Nalbandian, Tsonga, Blake, Davydenko, ( you're kidding me right) Safin( played two good tournaments in that entire period and was mostly injured), Djokovic, Murray, Del Potro, Soderling, Berdych ( only good from 2008 on aka the years he stopped winning titles), in all those players his only real competition was Nadal on clay and in a limited basis on Wimbledon, he had cake walks on the hard courts meaning two grand slams a masters cup and 6 masters series in the year.
Federer's era was by far the weakest era in Men's tennis, nothing you say can change that.
Gherbi Hicham So? So what if its a weak era? A win is a win.
To me THE greatest player ever. His prime level was unparalleled, unmatchable. With or without FO. And fuck the clay anyway, it is a different game than tennis.
His GS and No1 records are broken, but so are the Schwarzenegger's or Senna's. Coleman and Haney have 8 Olympias, Schumacher has more titles than Ayrton. But when the question who's is the greatest comes up, people always say Arnold and Senna.
Legend........Nadal's followin Pete......The only two greats....
nadal's followin medical treatment for recovery right now..meanwhile federer is wining atp titles.
XD
also back then there were more specialists
like muster, chang, brugera etc....were great at the french, whereas now u really only have nadal who is a true specialist at the french,
also back then u had grass court specialists like henman, rafter ivanisevic....who now is exceptional on grass, apart from federer, nadal? there arent many "specialists"
Not the best of all times but one of the best tennis players ever ! !
If Pete had a Djoko, Nadal or Fed in those years, he would have pushed more. When you are alone it is hard to keep being motivated
With every player playing his best, I would take Sampras and McEnroe over Federer at Wimbledon.
Best "Pistol Pete"!. I really, miss you so much!
Such a honest and cute docu.
AS far as the media situation with Pete, i think the real issue is that Pete was conservative and the media never puffs up a conservative. MUhammad Ali was agreat fighter but he was puffed up by the media far beyong what he deserves because he was a counter-culture figure. He was a Muslim and a draft dodger so the media loved him and puffed him up relebtlessly. Pete got the opposite treatment.
Retired very early in comparison to modern players. He also used a racket that he didn't want to "upgrade" or change for a better modern one. Making me wonder if he played on, just for a couple of years more, how many titles would he have won? Either way, seems like not just a great player, but a good family man.
Pete i looooooooooooove youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu haha....simply d best tennis player!
Sampras siempre grande Pete
Agreed. Nadal and him are so close, but right now I give a slight edge to Federer and they both aren't done.
tennis greats have already said that this era is one of the greatest and toughest with RF, Rafa, Djoko , Murray, Potro 5 slam winners 3 of them having 33 between them never happened before in any era beating every other guy and winning for 8 years since 04... we are not talking about 1 or 2 years 8 years on we will never see domination like this by the big 3 they are class apart...
pete the great
Easy. Modern racquet & technology, as well as the agregious slowing of most courts. Racquets and strings are going to constantly evolve, but the courts speeds could vary from really fast to really slow, so that we could see different styles of play that actually wins tournaments.
Sampras the greatest. Sampras, Nadal, Borg and Djokovic the BEST to watch