Nikon Z 135mm f1.8s Plena VS Nikon Z 24-200mm f4-6.3 VR for LANDSCAPE PHOTOGRAPHY

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @MrSimonj1970
    @MrSimonj1970 7 місяців тому +6

    Nice to see your lack of lens snobbery despite owning the best one! I like the 24-200mm a lot, but I went with the 24-120mm instead, I need the f/4 more than the extra 80mm.

  • @torchedfire5659
    @torchedfire5659 7 місяців тому +4

    this guy deserves more subs 100%

  • @Thomas-fk6ep
    @Thomas-fk6ep 7 місяців тому +2

    How about the Nikkor Z Macro 105mm F/2.8 for Landscapes? My 90mm Tamron shot beautiful cityscapes, but I sold it after switching to mirrorless.

    • @TheProjectPhotography
      @TheProjectPhotography  7 місяців тому +1

      Hmm I think you'd get a similar feel in terms of focal length to the Plena but definitely a tad shorter. I do tend to shoot quite a few images at 105mm tbh so I can definitely see it working. Best thing to do is try it out for yourself!

  • @tonyhayes9827
    @tonyhayes9827 7 місяців тому +2

    About the Plena. That point about the panoramas is very interesting,. Haven't heard that before. Opens up a whole new use case for this lens. I don't really use it for landscape otherwise. Its more about subject isolation for me. Nice vid.

  • @javierflorian6
    @javierflorian6 6 місяців тому

    Please do a review of the new 28-400z lens

  • @KibbitUpIt
    @KibbitUpIt 7 місяців тому +1

    Nice review as always

  • @Thomas-fk6ep
    @Thomas-fk6ep 7 місяців тому

    I prefer the 1mm lens @ 8:07 :)

    • @TheProjectPhotography
      @TheProjectPhotography  7 місяців тому +1

      Dang I can't believe I didn't catch that. I meant to put 135mm, I apologize for the wrong number.