Multiple Two Lens System with Diverging and Converging Lens

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 86

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  9 місяців тому +2

    Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/

  • @GoatzAreEpic
    @GoatzAreEpic 2 роки тому +30

    it's so satisfying to correctly make a lens ray diagram. It takes a while to get the hang of it, but in the end it's quite fun!

  • @diftq8191
    @diftq8191 3 роки тому +64

    This video is definitely a good place to start if you have no idea what you're doing

  • @eugeniaagnesrombelayuk1789
    @eugeniaagnesrombelayuk1789 2 роки тому +12

    very clear and concise as always, thank you!

  • @cubingtubing8172
    @cubingtubing8172 2 роки тому +19

    Interesting. I didn't know we could use the first image of the object as the object for the second lens. Thanks for the solution!

  • @kylebantsi
    @kylebantsi Рік тому +4

    7 years later still saving lives

  • @johnpalvendia5094
    @johnpalvendia5094 6 років тому +15

    This is gold. Thanks so much!

  • @BenardOnchieku-ny5qc
    @BenardOnchieku-ny5qc Рік тому +1

    Very clear and most interesting

  • @AbdurahmanChirfa
    @AbdurahmanChirfa Рік тому +1

    Amazing Explanations

  • @sanjayleel2927
    @sanjayleel2927 7 років тому +20

    Can you please upload wave optics

  • @radadela8630
    @radadela8630 4 роки тому +3

    Very well explained.Thank you very much💖

  • @إحساسفيزيائية
    @إحساسفيزيائية 5 років тому +5

    This channel change my life .. 😍
    Thanks 💜💕

    • @neonboy1998
      @neonboy1998 5 років тому

      Your religon changed our lives forever. Now we have to live in fear. Long live allah

    • @إحساسفيزيائية
      @إحساسفيزيائية 5 років тому

      @@neonboy1998
      In the religion of Islam, everyone lives in love and love of good. Nobody lives in fear. For us all human beings are brothers to us (we are all sons of Adam).
      I hope that racism will stop in this world and think about our minds that God has given us to use.

    • @إحساسفيزيائية
      @إحساسفيزيائية 5 років тому +2

      @@neonboy1998
      I marvel at this limited mind! I know that the media distorts the image of Islam and calls it terrorism (terrorism has no religion). How many innocent Muslims killed his victim. In the Qur'an in the sense of the verse (which killed a man as if he killed all people), as the hadith says, do not cut down a tree and not destroy the house of worship.
      You do not know Islam, many like you were one of the strongest enemies of Islam, but when they searched for and learned it became Muslims. Because Islam addresses the mind. and the verses of the Qur'an contain a miracle later discovered by scholars. I think if you look at the Crusades and the massacres of the Jews and count the numbers, you will find that terrorism has no religion .

    • @إحساسفيزيائية
      @إحساسفيزيائية 5 років тому

      @Sumedh Kudale
      Watch this
      ua-cam.com/video/NjAb3iAFejw/v-deo.html

    • @zaraaussie
      @zaraaussie 4 роки тому +1

      @@neonboy1998 you're so pathetic. your shit is getting old. go read something. educate yourself about religion and beliefs and actual terrorsim rather than attacking random comments on a chemistry video. says a lot about you. ignorant racist nuisance

  • @stevendee6800
    @stevendee6800 3 роки тому +2

    Dude you’re a hero

  • @swan20051395
    @swan20051395 7 років тому +5

    This is so good

  • @negarolfati36
    @negarolfati36 2 роки тому

    Thanks a lot! You are my hero

  • @kangmoabel
    @kangmoabel 3 роки тому +1

    Right now i am a pilot because of you

  • @emanali-jw6yq
    @emanali-jw6yq 6 місяців тому

    If a lens produced a 5cm tall image of an 8 cm high object when placed 10cm from the lens what is the apparent image distance ?
    Construct ray diagram?

  • @Imubozuu
    @Imubozuu 6 років тому +3

    On my test I had a convergent lens followed by a concave mirror. Initially, the "image-lens" distance on the convergent lens gave me a positive value, meaning it was formed between the convergent lens and the concave mirror. Now, when calculating "di" for the concave mirror, did I have to give the original "image-lens" value from the convergent lens a negative sign because it was a "virtual object/Image" for the concave mirror?

  • @Ahmed-zh1qr
    @Ahmed-zh1qr 5 років тому

    you are great , sir
    you help me so much

  • @rw4877
    @rw4877 6 років тому +2

    Can you ever have a situation where the object is closer than the focal length of the first convex lens ???

  • @davidnoelvillalon8363
    @davidnoelvillalon8363 7 років тому +3

    just for clarification,,, the formula for mirrors and lens are the same? f is negative for convex mirrors and lens?

    • @nitinmaharaja4389
      @nitinmaharaja4389 7 років тому

      no

    • @nitinmaharaja4389
      @nitinmaharaja4389 7 років тому +1

      1/f=1/do +1/di is lens formula
      1/f= 1/do -1/di is mirror formula
      where do means distance of the object and di means distance of the image

    • @nitinmaharaja4389
      @nitinmaharaja4389 7 років тому +3

      f is positive for conve lens and f is negative for concave lens

    • @davidnoelvillalon8363
      @davidnoelvillalon8363 7 років тому +1

      thank you for answering,, the owner of this videos dont really reply on questions tlke this, i appriciate your response,, god bless you

    • @nitinmaharaja4389
      @nitinmaharaja4389 7 років тому +1

      David Noel Villalon thanks

  • @johancharolia6596
    @johancharolia6596 4 роки тому +1

    Why would the Di for the second image be inverted when the m value is positive. It should be upright???

    • @byjeremy.
      @byjeremy. 4 роки тому +2

      Because for the second image, the 'object' is the calculated first image he obtained which was inverted. Since the m value is positive its orientation will remain the same which is inverted but if the value is negative then it would become upright (inversion of the inverted image).

  • @DaBeast34
    @DaBeast34 4 роки тому +2

    You totally had this video in 1080p but uploaded in 360p

  • @snbh2440
    @snbh2440 2 роки тому +2

    watching this almost six years later

  • @physics67
    @physics67 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much.

  • @LhatenLhaten
    @LhatenLhaten 2 місяці тому

    Why positive 12 for Do incase of second lens? Since it is on left side?

  • @MoreMoreLK
    @MoreMoreLK 10 місяців тому

    thank you very much

  • @theoradicella1360
    @theoradicella1360 Місяць тому

    What about the total magnification?

  • @avgchz9444
    @avgchz9444 3 роки тому +1

    you are a god.

  • @SlaterWiles
    @SlaterWiles 2 місяці тому +1

  • @edwardsikanyika6366
    @edwardsikanyika6366 3 роки тому

    Am only behind where u said 4 is negative please elaborate more on that

  • @miguelbarrera4383
    @miguelbarrera4383 2 роки тому +1

    Why is the diverging lens focal length negative?

  • @les_smore___smore1592
    @les_smore___smore1592 7 років тому +5

    Can you please upload about diffraction

  • @jugheadsick13
    @jugheadsick13 Рік тому

    if di of the first lens is positive shouldn't the do be negative?

  • @mataiwal4648
    @mataiwal4648 4 роки тому +1

    Question why M is negative?

    • @cubingtubing8172
      @cubingtubing8172 2 роки тому +1

      When dealing with Real Images, we use the notation that the magnification is negative.

  • @rickastley6571
    @rickastley6571 4 роки тому +1

    Do u have a video on inclined mirrors?

  • @mia9116
    @mia9116 3 роки тому

    i thought that if the lens is concave, then the focal length is positive and if the lens is convex, the focal length is negative?

  • @NewtonNyon-mo9xw
    @NewtonNyon-mo9xw Рік тому

    You are good

  • @taejungaarmy9425
    @taejungaarmy9425 5 років тому

    How can we draw ray diagram when an object is placed on the right side of the concave lens?

    • @ujintamang7654
      @ujintamang7654 4 роки тому

      Concave lens always forms virtual, erect and diminished image of an object

  • @harlbertmayerh7523
    @harlbertmayerh7523 4 роки тому +1

    Can you please upload telescope loop and microscope without accomodation and with maximum accomodation :-)))))))))))))

  • @ARCSTREAMS
    @ARCSTREAMS 3 роки тому

    does snells law still apply in principal to lenses and optics but the equation changes?

    • @amitagarwalla8205
      @amitagarwalla8205 3 роки тому

      it is the same for those which are undergoing refraction.

    • @ARCSTREAMS
      @ARCSTREAMS 3 роки тому

      @@amitagarwalla8205 so i can still use n1sintheta1=n2sintheta2 for lenses?

    • @cubingtubing8172
      @cubingtubing8172 2 роки тому

      @@ARCSTREAMS Snell's law is a very basic law for refraction. We can't find values of certain variables, such as the image distance and object distance. We have to use the Thin Lens Formula. Thin Lens Formula is also nothing but approximation.
      Sad thing about Ray Optics is that there is a lot of approximation involved. Using basic ideas such as Snell's law doesn't turn out to be very effective.
      I hope my comment cleared whatever problem you had.

    • @ARCSTREAMS
      @ARCSTREAMS 2 роки тому

      @@cubingtubing8172 it was no problem juts curious at the time, thx

    • @cubingtubing8172
      @cubingtubing8172 2 роки тому

      @@ARCSTREAMS Ah no problem.

  • @tommyhansen7600
    @tommyhansen7600 Рік тому

    11:00 i was so scared for a sec

  • @tarathetop
    @tarathetop 4 роки тому

    SO if I have a magnification of -8 is the image enlarged smaller?

    • @douglasarcher58
      @douglasarcher58 4 роки тому +3

      It's enlarged but inverted

    • @tarathetop
      @tarathetop 4 роки тому

      K. So, I have consider the magnitude only?

    • @douglasarcher58
      @douglasarcher58 4 роки тому

      @@tarathetop What do u mean exactly?

    • @tarathetop
      @tarathetop 4 роки тому

      I mean that I have to consider |-8| to consider if the image is enlarged or is smaller right?(Ignoring the direction at the moment)

    • @douglasarcher58
      @douglasarcher58 4 роки тому +2

      @@tarathetop Oh yeah I get what you mean. Yes you only consider the magnitude

  • @ummeshifa5471
    @ummeshifa5471 2 роки тому

    By the way...the correct formula for lens is 1/f= 1/distance of image from lens - 1/distance of object from lens.....

  • @StephenNyarko-c1w
    @StephenNyarko-c1w Рік тому

    Please I have a question for you

    • @StephenNyarko-c1w
      @StephenNyarko-c1w Рік тому

      Two thin lenses are in contact so that their axes coincide. The focal length of the two lenses are 15 and 25 respectively. An object is viewed through the combination and the final image produced is 2cm high, erect and 20cm behind the lenses. What is the position ,size and nature of the object

  • @closetskeletonmusic
    @closetskeletonmusic 8 місяців тому

    5:45 wrong

  • @ricco5215
    @ricco5215 2 роки тому

    7:18 DIO?!

  • @gobikasenthil5730
    @gobikasenthil5730 4 роки тому +1

    Plz Meaning soluga sir

  • @anwarrobturay3524
    @anwarrobturay3524 3 роки тому

    Can you please solve this question “ A converging lens produces a real image that is three times the size of an object. Calculate the distance of the image from the lens.”

    • @alxazar
      @alxazar 3 роки тому

      were you not given the f or some other way to find it (D perhaps)?

    • @dinamush1342
      @dinamush1342 2 роки тому +1

      You can use the formula for the magnification for this, since it's a real image the magnification will be negative.

    • @dinamush1342
      @dinamush1342 2 роки тому

      m = hi/ho
      -3= hi/ho
      -3 x ho = hi
      Since the magnification for the height and the distance will be equal you can just use the distance instead
      so
      -3 = -di/do
      -3 x do = -di
      3 x -do = di

  • @ompatel621
    @ompatel621 2 роки тому

    thanks daddyyy

  • @erdenesurenusukhjargal2283
    @erdenesurenusukhjargal2283 3 роки тому

    69k views noice

  • @Lo_rer16
    @Lo_rer16 Рік тому

    어려운