I get that it's supposed to be a simplified version and that these are very complicated concepts so it's natural to miss out information but there is so much misinformation and misconceptions in it
@@RegnStövel Nah just read him and you would understand why people get sick of all this misinfo on his theory If you wanna see actual worship of marx look anywhere else other than this comment lmao
Some minor corrections, UK does not completely count as a symbolic monarchy, The Monarch does bave involvement in the political process of the country, they are the ones that put pen to paper on bills when they have passed both the House of Commons and Lords, they are the ones that open and close parliament, who swear loyalty to the King, they are also the ones who declare that an electoral period is to commence etc. A real example of Symbolic monarchy is sweden, whos monarch is literally there only as a symbol, parliament approves and also enacts law, commands the military, the swedish monarch usually only hosts foreign dignitaries and is the one that hands someone their Nobel prizes.
They can’t both be entirely economic systems because they use the same economic plan internally (which is a planned economy). Most communist countries aren’t actually communist because they install a socialist state which is ran by a communist party (like what the PRC is currently). However the People’s Republic of China uses a socialist market economy to actually keep it’s economy somewhat profitable in the 21st century, mainly because planned economies don’t work anymore.
@@jmacius a planned economy is one ideological perspective that’s not the only one Yugoslavia had market socialism where the workers owned all the factories etc.. and sold things to the market so still no singular private owner but at the same time an economy not highly regulated aside from that Communeim has always been the goal ie a classless society it’s never actually been achieved nor claimed to have been achieved, and again planned economy was just one aspect and execution it was not the only option
@@jmacius communisms end goal is a classless, stateless society as no nation has achieved that none can be called communist many have been socialist, but even then socialism is broad and has no one size fits all approach , central planning is one mode by which people belive we can reach a communist state but then you have anarcho socialist who belive in no Centeral planning and self management of the society at the individual level
0:55 - What you describes here isn't Socialism but Marxism-Leninism or Stalinism or State Socialism or State Capitalism. Socialism isn't supposed to have a normal State and even Lenin recognized this in The State and Revolution when he talks about what is a workers' State and it's very different to what we got with the Soviet Union and all the supposedly socialistic states of the 20th Century.
@@carinaslima *Yeah, but you actually think that is possible? Don’t make me laugh.* Bro, please, go investigate for real like watching Anarks series about libertarian socialist experiment and looking for yourself information of FEJUVE or CECOSESOLA or the CNT, even better, look up for "1.0.0 Stinky Right-winger Factsheet By Socialism Done Left" that it's a mega document where you can see many aspects of this discussion, I think there's a libertarian socialist section.
The whole socialism section is wrong your describing communism not socialism. Similar but very different government ideas one communism is a form of governance where socialism is instead a set a ideas for a system.
incorrect, you got it backwards. Socialism is a political ideology, while communism is a utopian ideal. Socialism is as described a form of generally more authoritarian government, while communism at it's utopian ideal has no government.
@@lowlsqwid no that's not even close communism isn't a utopia idea the fact their are multiple communities nations shows that. Unless you think china and the ussr are utopian nation's. Socialism is a wide breath of ideas with communism as one of many political systems that use it as a framework. With plenty of example states existing most falling into the internal Communism external state capitalism model. But most of the west EU is socialist has major socialist political parties or active programs. Socialism is more comparable to markets as a political ideology. A framing for which to build within or on. Markets give us mercantilism capitalism and more socialism gives us communism but it also gives us other political frameworks the well farm state public health ECT. Communism is a government socialism is a framework communism is built on.
@@koboldqueen3055You clearly haven't read Marx... Socialism is the transitional state between capitalism and communism. There was never a "communist state", and there cannot be - as communism is a utopian post-scarcity society. What you are describing as "socialism in Europe", are rather deformed social democratic parties that have nothing to do with true socialism, as there is still capitalist mode of production in place - ie, private property.
@@koboldqueen3055 Communism is indeed a sub-section of Socialism (with Anarchism being a sub-section of Communism) and strives for a utopian ideal. There are multiple countries whose ruling parties call themselves communist, because in their conception they had communism as their ideal to strive for. They haven't yet achieved it fully, either because of a lack of resources or because of internal corruption and fall to autocracy. This video is one I have gotten recommend a few times that explain the difference and relationship between communism, socialism and anarchism: ua-cam.com/video/vyl2DeKT-Vs/v-deo.html
To clear everything up for my fellow leftists this is how I interpret it Socialism: when the means of production is owned by the working class and a dictatorship of the proletariat is established with its main goal being to achieve communism Communism: an ideology that advocates for a communist society - a classless, stateless and moneyless society (basically a utopia)
4:17 Governors, not senators, manage the states and their constituents in the US. Senators are just state representatives to the federal government, and mostly focus on national rather than state issues. State legislatures also have senators, but I assuming ypu're referring to federal senators.
Monarchy isn’t always hereditary. There were cases in history of elective monarchy, where the monarch’s successor is not necessarily his blood relative but is rather elected. One historical example of this was the Holy Roman Empire.
Correction: Socialism is an economic system, NOT a type of Government. Also the United Kingdom is not a country, rather it is made up of three sovereign states: 🏴 🏴 🏴 and a commonwealth, which is Northern Ireland.
This video showcases minor problems such as what is and what isn't a government. This video is presenting more of how ideologies morph the way governments work than presenting actual government forms. Firstly, let me define what I think a government is, accordingly to "A Comparative Study of Municipal Adoption of Internet-Based Citizen Participation" by Stephen K Aikins, Chapter 11, it reads "A governance structure comprising political institutions by which a state or locality is organized in order to exert its power over community politics. These political institutions are structures and mechanisms of social order and cooperation governing the behavior of individuals within the jurisdiction.". secondly, the ideologies, Socialism, Communism and Anarchism, these are ideologies and not forms of governments. Lastly, this video delves deeper into niches of government forms rather than the broad definition. In conclusion, this video shows the confusion between ideologies and governments and what they are and aren't along with how the video unnecessarily delves into niches rather than the genre as a whole.
In the Philippines we have different form of government but some of it was secretly practicing like Oligarchy, Monarchy (a.k.a political dynasty), Communist, & Federalism.
3:13 - Maybe you're overstimating how Stalin ruled. The guy had to make complex maneuvers withing the Party to achieve his goals. The Führerprinzip would have been a better example, you even have a Nazi representing Autocracy.
@@ShoaibAktar-ur6et But corruption does not have to do much with the democracy. Corruption is another thing and democracy is just a governance system... Yes, corruption leads to stop people and the country to the progress...but should be seen in its respective domain... First should be mentioned as Democracy, after then, going deeper the topic of corruption and the implementation should be discussed...
Best tax system is that in which tax is applyied on big houses , expensive car, what is expensive in house and on land owned. Because this cant be hidden , is impossible to have a big house or car and have low income at your bussines store
The color on the flag of the Philippines was placed incorrect . If it's lengthwise, the red should be on the right, and the blue should be on the left side.
How did you decide what order to present these systems? Historically the systems of government we have come to know developed over time in response to the increasing social, technological and especially economic complexity of human societies. Aristotle discusses this. Hegel does in his extolling the virtues of the enlightenment (and, because his job depended on it, the superiority of the enlightenment monarchy like that of Friedrich Wilhelm III). Many other people have too. Marx of course formulates his entire philosophy based on the premise that the world proletarian revolution is the goal of human history to eliminate the false hierarchical structures cruelly imposed upon the many by the cruelty and violence of the few. By just presenting them randomly in this way you create the false impression that they are all essentially equal systems which were arbitrarily arrived at “culturally” by different people somewhat randomly. They weren’t. History proves there is a pattern to the emergence of the idea of equality over time after cruel aristocrats use greed, violence and propaganda (like religion, etc) to enforce hierarchical systems of government upon agricultural societies. Freedom for the working people can and does get won back again over time. And this idea of equality grows while the false ideology of the inherent superiority of aristocrats of all types gradually fades away.
Just a curiosity, in most democratic monarchies that currently exist, the king can dissolve parliament in times of crisis and in the case of the United Kingdom he has the royal prerogative
7:01 - As happened with Socialism you're confusing Soviet Communism with Communism. Well, Socialism/Communism is the same thing, i.e. workers' ownership of the means of production, and it's not supposed to have a State. I will recommend a video from LuckyBlackCat that deals in the subject "Communism & Socialism: What Do They REALLY Mean?"
Good video, but should have added another disadvantage of democracy. Also, democracy does not necessarily mean human rights exist, as the majority or the representatives of the majority can vote or make decisions to nullify a person or group's rights.
I’d like to point out that no country is communist. Communism is only possible if the whole world participates, and that’s not the case (and won’t be possible (at least for a veryyy long time)). Many make that mistake but I think it’s important that people know that countries like china or Cuba are (in chinas case) socialist which failed hand (in case of Cuba) really socialist with the struggles of a economic barrier. Love your videos tho!!
2:47 When you say external factors I think about NGOs, UN, WEF, WHO and other entities which are not rooted in the country we are talking about. Not defending autocracy, but clearly there is some place for confusion in this moment of the video.
The US is a Republic that adapts other forms into it. Federal, Constitutional, Democratic, and even some aspects of communism when looking at tax laws and real estate.
As a Filipino, I’m thankful that we have a cross between the Republican and Democratic styles of goverments in my country. The people are at the epicenter of the government. I love that we have the ultimate power to elect and impeach a certain leader, President or otherwise, if they are legally proven unworthy of their political position. I do understand that, yes, there are drawbacks as with any other forms of governments, but I wouldn’t have it differently. The Philippines is for the Filipinos-the very people who made it as is.
The way you explained the monarchy 💀The monarchy is not bad (if it absolutely isn't) and you did very badly to only talk about the disadvantages of this form of government being also a democracy If you had to make a video explaining ideologies you had to explain the advantages of the monarchy
1:53 - What you are describing is a representative democracy mixed with bits of other democracy forms (as classical, parliamentary and particpative). Also the claim of an environment where human rights are respected in (representative) democracy is weird considering how its history.
Lets dumb down politics so Americans can understand it and then give them simplistic inaccurate information to base their world view upon. Personally I think most citizens of the USA realise that these labels rarely apply to any form of state ... I hope !
@@keneokeke9654 Firstly, I ain't your Dude. Secondly the vlog is simplified. Thirdly its innaccurate. Fourthly, and most importantly if you're basing your World view on badly researched (whether intentionally or unintentionaly) UA-cam videos I suggest you start to do some research of your own from 'credible' sources ... and travel a bit more. I note you don't state which country you come from.
On the oligarchy. I know it's low hanging fruit to treat Corporations as enemy number one, but the real culprit is government who first is the entity that created the concept of a corporation and the reason why corporations try to get what they want from government is because all the power government has. They are going to power to lobby what they want. No different than special interest groups.
In the United Kingdom we have a "Constitutional Monarchy", not a "Symbolic Monarchy". The King of the UK of GB & NI is technically still all-powerful, the monarch simply declines to use those powers as they know the next time they use their absolute power, will be the last time they use it as it will likely result in the end of the monarchy. There are all sorts of weird historical laws and privileges granted to the monarch that are still on the books
Just pointing out that in the Monarchy section, the Spanish and Swedish flags have their labels swapped. Cheers!
Great attentiveness🙌
Came here to say the exact same thing.
@@TheAnalystYTsyou put UK flag for new zealand
Can’t forget Laos and North Korea
Since I'm a flag expert, I determined that same thing on the very 1st try
I get that it's supposed to be a simplified version and that these are very complicated concepts so it's natural to miss out information but there is so much misinformation and misconceptions in it
Especially the part where America is supposed to be a Constitutional Republic.
And let's not talk about how he explained the monarchy by highlighting only that small flaw which is actually more of an advantage 💀
Exactly
My guy did not just swap North Korea and Laos 💀💀💀
Sweden and Spain too
@@ashen1921uk and new Zealand too
Ikr@@ashen1921
Not to mention the screwing up of the new-Zealand
Laos and North Korea also
What type do you want?
India: all of them🗿
Ya bro I feel all the types are in India 🇮🇳😂
Lmao 😂
I want a dictatorship like China
No monarchy only😅
@@Diecastlover777Gujarati's are the monarchs
0:20 yes the Spanish flag is ikea
😂😂
The laos flag is north korea hahahhaa
it's called sweden
ikea? Another American I should have figured out
back to school!!
Marx is rolling in his grave rn
Fr fr
People need to stop worshipping him
@@RegnStövel Nah just read him and you would understand why people get sick of all this misinfo on his theory
If you wanna see actual worship of marx look anywhere else other than this comment lmao
iam rolling on my floor for him
@@9393Technatecan we just all be mature and not fight about political stuff pls this I yt
Some minor corrections, UK does not completely count as a symbolic monarchy, The Monarch does bave involvement in the political process of the country, they are the ones that put pen to paper on bills when they have passed both the House of Commons and Lords, they are the ones that open and close parliament, who swear loyalty to the King, they are also the ones who declare that an electoral period is to commence etc.
A real example of Symbolic monarchy is sweden, whos monarch is literally there only as a symbol, parliament approves and also enacts law, commands the military, the swedish monarch usually only hosts foreign dignitaries and is the one that hands someone their Nobel prizes.
👏👏👏👏
Yes, we have a Constitutional Monarchy, not a Symbolic Monarchy
Yes Technically the King of the UK has never actually had it's power taken away.
Wow a paint explainer clone that I found on the day of the first video crazy
cant wait for people to hate on all of em like the pngtubers back then
Socialism and Communism aren’t governmental systems but economic systems
They can’t both be entirely economic systems because they use the same economic plan internally (which is a planned economy). Most communist countries aren’t actually communist because they install a socialist state which is ran by a communist party (like what the PRC is currently). However the People’s Republic of China uses a socialist market economy to actually keep it’s economy somewhat profitable in the 21st century, mainly because planned economies don’t work anymore.
@@jmacius a planned economy is one ideological perspective that’s not the only one Yugoslavia had market socialism where the workers owned all the factories etc.. and sold things to the market so still no singular private owner but at the same time an economy not highly regulated aside from that Communeim has always been the goal ie a classless society it’s never actually been achieved nor claimed to have been achieved, and again planned economy was just one aspect and execution it was not the only option
@@jmacius communisms end goal is a classless, stateless society as no nation has achieved that none can be called communist many have been socialist, but even then socialism is broad and has no one size fits all approach , central planning is one mode by which people belive we can reach a communist state but then you have anarcho socialist who belive in no Centeral planning and self management of the society at the individual level
Was about to say the same!
India is a republic, constitutional, democracy and socialist at the same time.
0:55 - What you describes here isn't Socialism but Marxism-Leninism or Stalinism or State Socialism or State Capitalism. Socialism isn't supposed to have a normal State and even Lenin recognized this in The State and Revolution when he talks about what is a workers' State and it's very different to what we got with the Soviet Union and all the supposedly socialistic states of the 20th Century.
How many comments will you post?
@@RegnStövel I posted 9 comments.
Came here to say this
Yeah, but you actually think that is possible? Don’t make me laugh.
@@carinaslima *Yeah, but you actually think that is possible? Don’t make me laugh.*
Bro, please, go investigate for real like watching Anarks series about libertarian socialist experiment and looking for yourself information of FEJUVE or CECOSESOLA or the CNT, even better, look up for "1.0.0 Stinky Right-winger Factsheet By Socialism Done Left" that it's a mega document where you can see many aspects of this discussion, I think there's a libertarian socialist section.
So much accurate and so much easily noticed mistakes. Such as wrong flags, double listing countries under different systems, wrong listing, etc
Every minute of this video being played, a political scientist dies
In India and Pakistan you will find all these. 😅
So TRUE
Ye
I don't understand
lol 😂
In Nepal too
Bro flipped indonesia's flag on its side
I saw Philippines on its side and I was like "okay," then I saw Indonesia on its side like wtf 😭😭😭
0:18 Spain and Sweden are swapped but good video
The whole socialism section is wrong your describing communism not socialism. Similar but very different government ideas one communism is a form of governance where socialism is instead a set a ideas for a system.
incorrect, you got it backwards. Socialism is a political ideology, while communism is a utopian ideal. Socialism is as described a form of generally more authoritarian government, while communism at it's utopian ideal has no government.
@@lowlsqwid no that's not even close communism isn't a utopia idea the fact their are multiple communities nations shows that. Unless you think china and the ussr are utopian nation's. Socialism is a wide breath of ideas with communism as one of many political systems that use it as a framework. With plenty of example states existing most falling into the internal Communism external state capitalism model. But most of the west EU is socialist has major socialist political parties or active programs. Socialism is more comparable to markets as a political ideology. A framing for which to build within or on. Markets give us mercantilism capitalism and more socialism gives us communism but it also gives us other political frameworks the well farm state public health ECT. Communism is a government socialism is a framework communism is built on.
@@koboldqueen3055You clearly haven't read Marx... Socialism is the transitional state between capitalism and communism. There was never a "communist state", and there cannot be - as communism is a utopian post-scarcity society. What you are describing as "socialism in Europe", are rather deformed social democratic parties that have nothing to do with true socialism, as there is still capitalist mode of production in place - ie, private property.
@@koboldqueen3055 Communism is indeed a sub-section of Socialism (with Anarchism being a sub-section of Communism) and strives for a utopian ideal. There are multiple countries whose ruling parties call themselves communist, because in their conception they had communism as their ideal to strive for. They haven't yet achieved it fully, either because of a lack of resources or because of internal corruption and fall to autocracy.
This video is one I have gotten recommend a few times that explain the difference and relationship between communism, socialism and anarchism: ua-cam.com/video/vyl2DeKT-Vs/v-deo.html
To clear everything up for my fellow leftists this is how I interpret it
Socialism: when the means of production is owned by the working class and a dictatorship of the proletariat is established with its main goal being to achieve communism
Communism: an ideology that advocates for a communist society - a classless, stateless and moneyless society (basically a utopia)
7:49 is no one talking about the fact that bro swapped north korea and laos
Ikr!
I notice
Everyone is..
I saw and it funny
I just wanna point out the fact that oligarchy should not be synonymous with wealth, because it can come in many forms.
Pretty much every state in the world is an oligarchy
I thought Russia is a oligarchy
@@billyfung715It is totalitarian
Russia is also an oligarchy
India is a republic, democracy, presidential and parliamentary government country with constitutions❤😂
I am proud of my country
Presidential huh? President doesn't have control over people of india
Shithole
its totalitarian
@@flameakyt1156 Read the constitution 😂
@@epicgamer-ec8vi that is why bjp couldn't win even 300 seats this time
🇵🇭: Democracy+Republic+Presidential+Constitutional = Anarchism
I love this guys videos. They just make so much sense and they dont even take long to watch or learn.
Too bad it’s completely wrong
They're also completely wrong.
Symbolic monarchy be like : i hire a professional person in charge to manage my kingdom.
Political system and economic system can be different like feudalism working with monarchy and democracy and capitalism working together
4:17 Governors, not senators, manage the states and their constituents in the US. Senators are just state representatives to the federal government, and mostly focus on national rather than state issues. State legislatures also have senators, but I assuming ypu're referring to federal senators.
And the US is a constitutional Republic, not a federation
I believe it is a constitutional federal republic
bro confused sweden and spain
Monarchy isn’t always hereditary. There were cases in history of elective monarchy, where the monarch’s successor is not necessarily his blood relative but is rather elected. One historical example of this was the Holy Roman Empire.
they still exist, though in various forms, the UAE and Malaysia for examples
U forgot parlamentary Monarchy. It played a major role in history.
I love ur videos dont stop posting them👍🏼
Thank you very much for honesty on a video by trying to include weaknesses of government systems and trying to remove bias
Oh how wrong you are 😂
@@MultiSciGeek Because….? The video didn’t do that?
Straight to business! I love this
no, there is no state in communism, that what make the difference with socialism, socialisme have a state
Correction: Socialism is an economic system, NOT a type of Government. Also the United Kingdom is not a country, rather it is made up of three sovereign states: 🏴 🏴 🏴 and a commonwealth, which is Northern Ireland.
This video showcases minor problems such as what is and what isn't a government. This video is presenting more of how ideologies morph the way governments work than presenting actual government forms. Firstly, let me define what I think a government is, accordingly to "A Comparative Study of Municipal Adoption of Internet-Based Citizen Participation" by Stephen K Aikins, Chapter 11, it reads "A governance structure comprising political institutions by which a state or locality is organized in order to exert its power over community politics. These political institutions are structures and mechanisms of social order and cooperation governing the behavior of individuals within the jurisdiction.". secondly, the ideologies, Socialism, Communism and Anarchism, these are ideologies and not forms of governments. Lastly, this video delves deeper into niches of government forms rather than the broad definition. In conclusion, this video shows the confusion between ideologies and governments and what they are and aren't along with how the video unnecessarily delves into niches rather than the genre as a whole.
He put those flags in a random Shuffling machine 💀
This video has a lot of errors
How u don't even know
How u don't even know
How u don't even know
How u don't even know
How u don't even know
Spanish and Swedish flags are swapped
American moment
@@TheLegoSpider lol
In the Philippines we have different form of government but some of it was secretly practicing like Oligarchy, Monarchy (a.k.a political dynasty), Communist, & Federalism.
Spain: I'm sweden now?
Sweden: I'm Spain now?
India is also both of republic and democracy
Democracy tab tak jab tak Majority 🕉️ Hai .😊
Moral of the story: there’s no perfect one-size-fits-all approach but at least have integrity and humility whenever in a vital role.
Man called Spain, Sweden
Japan and UK are literally the same:
UK:
*Constitutional Monarchy
*Parliamentary
Japan:
*Constitutional Monarchy
*Parliamentary
North Korea: Autocracy! I'm adding that to my list.
I love how he didn’t use the U.S. for every example
SAME HERE, I hate Yankee yappery, this was refreshing.
7:47 LOL Laos and North Korea had their names at the wrong flags.
3:13 - Maybe you're overstimating how Stalin ruled. The guy had to make complex maneuvers withing the Party to achieve his goals. The Führerprinzip would have been a better example, you even have a Nazi representing Autocracy.
he was still a dictator
@@combineconformist Yeah
@@combineconformist He was still based
@@yamameeven967 No he wasn’t, communism was bound to fail and so was that idiot of a “leader”.
They never taught me this in school which says a lot about our system
I love how you go straight to the point
Hey! Didn't you mentioned *India* as the greatest example of *Democracy* ?
As an Indian South Africa is better
Leave india then@@aytshorts52009
Whi to😂
because of corruption
@@ShoaibAktar-ur6et But corruption does not have to do much with the democracy.
Corruption is another thing and democracy is just a governance system...
Yes, corruption leads to stop people and the country to the progress...but should be seen in its respective domain...
First should be mentioned as Democracy, after then, going deeper the topic of corruption and the implementation should be discussed...
0:19 SPAIN AND SWEDEN SWAPPED
2:26 New Zealand is now British again!
Just found out that the channel was created the same date of my bday
Best tax system is that in which tax is applyied on big houses , expensive car, what is expensive in house and on land owned. Because this cant be hidden , is impossible to have a big house or car and have low income at your bussines store
I feel that you went weak on democracy and boosted it above the others.
hmm
@@TheAnalystYTs Is that a good “hmm” or bad “hmm”?
“The lack of democratic governance” YES PATRICK.
everyone talking about laos and n. korea being swapped but no one talking about sweden and spain
ikr
wtf, communsim sounds amazing.
ill admit i have no idea about government and politics but its crazy such few countries are using it
The best type of goverment leader ship is Communist ....
hey😡 Atleast they got sexy mustaches!
😂😂
OML
The color on the flag of the Philippines was placed incorrect . If it's lengthwise, the red should be on the right, and the blue should be on the left side.
Spain: ¿¡J0dεr! Soy Suecia, tio?!
Sweden: Vad tusan!? Är jag Spanien?!
i thought china was only communist by name
The UK is a constitutional monarchy 🇬🇧
Sheik Hasina, PM of Bangladesh is now a recent example of autocracy.
Explain... Don't know anything
*Former PM
And after that Bangladesh will be a *Military dictatorship*
9:41 : France : "What you're saying, that's magic powder" (But joke aside, you're right)
How did you decide what order to present these systems? Historically the systems of government we have come to know developed over time in response to the increasing social, technological and especially economic complexity of human societies. Aristotle discusses this. Hegel does in his extolling the virtues of the enlightenment (and, because his job depended on it, the superiority of the enlightenment monarchy like that of Friedrich Wilhelm III). Many other people have too. Marx of course formulates his entire philosophy based on the premise that the world proletarian revolution is the goal of human history to eliminate the false hierarchical structures cruelly imposed upon the many by the cruelty and violence of the few.
By just presenting them randomly in this way you create the false impression that they are all essentially equal systems which were arbitrarily arrived at “culturally” by different people somewhat randomly. They weren’t. History proves there is a pattern to the emergence of the idea of equality over time after cruel aristocrats use greed, violence and propaganda (like religion, etc) to enforce hierarchical systems of government upon agricultural societies. Freedom for the working people can and does get won back again over time. And this idea of equality grows while the false ideology of the inherent superiority of aristocrats of all types gradually fades away.
I’m not reading all that 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@jefif when did it become a trend to be stupid.
Keep up the good work 💪🏼
Just a curiosity, in most democratic monarchies that currently exist, the king can dissolve parliament in times of crisis and in the case of the United Kingdom he has the royal prerogative
The U.S. is a constitutional Republic as described in article 4 section 4 of the constitution.
India = biggest democracy ❤
0:20 this causes me a lot of headaches
7:01 - As happened with Socialism you're confusing Soviet Communism with Communism. Well, Socialism/Communism is the same thing, i.e. workers' ownership of the means of production, and it's not supposed to have a State. I will recommend a video from LuckyBlackCat that deals in the subject "Communism & Socialism: What Do They REALLY Mean?"
Socialism is an economic system, not a form of government/state system.
wheres my bud Fascism
It is totalism
I am a fashionista is that fascism
That is an ideology
Good video, but should have added another disadvantage of democracy. Also, democracy does not necessarily mean human rights exist, as the majority or the representatives of the majority can vote or make decisions to nullify a person or group's rights.
Democracy❌ Corruption✅
I’d like to point out that no country is communist. Communism is only possible if the whole world participates, and that’s not the case (and won’t be possible (at least for a veryyy long time)). Many make that mistake but I think it’s important that people know that countries like china or Cuba are (in chinas case) socialist which failed hand (in case of Cuba) really socialist with the struggles of a economic barrier.
Love your videos tho!!
Bro said Spain is Sweden and Sweden in Spain
all people make mistakes, that's OK
A legend has been born
Spain or Sweden?
2:47 When you say external factors I think about NGOs, UN, WEF, WHO and other entities which are not rooted in the country we are talking about.
Not defending autocracy, but clearly there is some place for confusion in this moment of the video.
Yeah, those old days in Somalia 😬 🇸🇴
Yeah I shocked when I heard Somalia, but it is true though :)
The US is a Republic that adapts other forms into it. Federal, Constitutional, Democratic, and even some aspects of communism when looking at tax laws and real estate.
new zealand has a british flag
wow, turns out I was a monarch this whole time. I was a descendent of a monarch no wonder why I’m just so amazing and I’m just so smart.
Bro skipped geography with all the wrong flags
As a Filipino, I’m thankful that we have a cross between the Republican and Democratic styles of goverments in my country. The people are at the epicenter of the government. I love that we have the ultimate power to elect and impeach a certain leader, President or otherwise, if they are legally proven unworthy of their political position.
I do understand that, yes, there are drawbacks as with any other forms of governments, but I wouldn’t have it differently. The Philippines is for the Filipinos-the very people who made it as is.
India today is everything
Meritocracy would be the best form of government i believe
The way you explained the monarchy 💀The monarchy is not bad (if it absolutely isn't) and you did very badly to only talk about the disadvantages of this form of government being also a democracy If you had to make a video explaining ideologies you had to explain the advantages of the monarchy
this video could help me to get some ideas to my subject social science👌👌👌
1:53 - What you are describing is a representative democracy mixed with bits of other democracy forms (as classical, parliamentary and particpative). Also the claim of an environment where human rights are respected in (representative) democracy is weird considering how its history.
Just gotta love how he switched around Spain and Swedens names 👍
Lets dumb down politics so Americans can understand it and then give them simplistic inaccurate information to base their world view upon. Personally I think most citizens of the USA realise that these labels rarely apply to any form of state ... I hope !
Dude I dunno what your waffling about, but I ain't American and the example in which he used my country was pretty accurate imo
@@keneokeke9654 Firstly, I ain't your Dude. Secondly the vlog is simplified. Thirdly its innaccurate. Fourthly, and most importantly if you're basing your World view on badly researched (whether intentionally or unintentionaly) UA-cam videos I suggest you start to do some research of your own from 'credible' sources ... and travel a bit more.
I note you don't state which country you come from.
Democracies: The people are the state.
Repiblics: The people own the state.
2:27 this New Zealand 🇳🇿 and this is the Uk 🇬🇧
I think they know that. They just simplified it
On the oligarchy. I know it's low hanging fruit to treat Corporations as enemy number one, but the real culprit is government who first is the entity that created the concept of a corporation and the reason why corporations try to get what they want from government is because all the power government has. They are going to power to lobby what they want. No different than special interest groups.
1:20 China??😅
Nor is north Korea
@@odaigassan5330 wdym
That was literally 🇻🇳 flag 💀
India during Independence.....Is there an option of All of these in MCQs ?
India: Hell Yeah..... I am going to choose All of these
Not explained
In the United Kingdom we have a "Constitutional Monarchy", not a "Symbolic Monarchy". The King of the UK of GB & NI is technically still all-powerful, the monarch simply declines to use those powers as they know the next time they use their absolute power, will be the last time they use it as it will likely result in the end of the monarchy. There are all sorts of weird historical laws and privileges granted to the monarch that are still on the books
Pragmatic civic Nationalism < Democracy