Is this lady taking part in The Creation and Maintenance of Public Myths? (see Philip D Zelikow) Or is it the kind of lady that you could give mind blowing revelations in Disneyland? I think she knows more, but wants to keep her job.
When you try a lot of criminal cases, you get a sense of body language and speech that only the pressure cooker of a witness stand can produce. It becomes easily obvious when someone is lying ot telling the truth by how they say something, not what they say.
Imagine finding the list of people whom have signed non disclosures with regard to national "security" matters. We could piece a lot of loose ends together knowing who can't tell the truth about stuff.
Generally speaking, when dealing with archival materials you’re better off using your bare hands. Handling an item with gloves reduces tactile sensation of the object and can result in inadvertent damage.
@@joshvoyles7870 spot on. I've held items from 1820s in this way, far older and more risky than this. Thoroughly washed hands is pretty much a rule for this now but as you say, far more control and less risk using uncovered hands.
I trust no one handling archival items that have no true love for history - why handle it in the first place? It doesn't need handling at all. Worse than those WIlliamsburg history yo-yos.
She needed to learn the word ALLEGED.. Unless there was a Secret Trial that she's privy to, Oswald, as far as I know, was never convicted in a Court of Law for killing JFK or Tippet!! Oswald's family can Sue them for Slandering his name..
@@todoroki2134 Yes, Agent Greer, knowing he was surrounded by witnesses and people filming him, turned into the faces of a carful of passengers inches away, shot Kennedy in the face, and then blamed Oswald for it. lol Oswald, of course, has an avalanche of hard evidence for his guilt.
More is seen now that it is better to have thoroughly washed your hands to handle objects than wear gloves as it means you have more control on the item with less risk of damaging the item using gloves. I've held book items from the 1820s in this way which are far less stable due to their age.
Seriously, here's what every 'archivist' is telling you when they unnecessarily handle historic items. "I can touch this and you can't because you're untrustworthy."
An old Russian rifle that snipers had told that it was impossible to reload and keep a moving target in sight, beside that Oswald was not a bull eye. Experts say that a same model rifle was used but it was modified to semi automatic and a real sniper was the shooter. Oswald was sacrifice lamb. He shot his rifle to make it looks that it was the weapon.
It was “Italian” not Russian. CE-399 is a lie. They took more fragments from Connelly’s wrist than is missing from the “single bullet” The handling and firing of that particular weapon will vary from shooter to shooter.
I am not an expert on hand writing, but you can clearly see , that 2 different hand writing is going on here, i believe it's either Marinas handwriting & why i think that is because back then in the USSR, you did not have a normal ball point pen, but a fountain pen. Which you can see also different things or items written down don't match up at all, it is normally every letter is always written in the same way, especially the Y's, Numbers, G's etc etc. Also they don't mention anything about the 2 rifles they have & that they are both the same type of rifle, but 1 is longer than the other & also the FBI put metal shims under the scope just to make it accurate to test fire, which i believe they used that reason, then to say here's the bullets that were recovered from inside the car.
0:31 One of the clearest images I've ever seen of the single bullet, putting the lie to the claims made by many authors that the bullet was "nearly pristine." Actually it's not even close to pristine; the base of the bullet is severely flattened.
Have you seen a bullet that has actually hit some bones.....it is relatively pristine. Strange things happen but the list of strange things is in itself strange.
@@peartree460 ok , baby steps 1 , buy the same rifle & ammo 2, fire it through NON uniform ballistic gel & see that air spaces deflect things 3, line up 2 ballistic torsos, the way JFK & Connolly were REALLY positioned & fire 4, then you are allowed to be arrogant
@@WapTek123 how is what i said in any way arrogant? Ive seen the test you outlined done several times by both sides of the debate...never seen the slug pristine after. Ever. Maybe look up the word arrogant...from my 5th grade vocabulary test. ☝️ now that is arrogant 😎
I drink geritol to take the place of alcohol. I usually drink 5 bottles a day, and by night fall I sleep like a baby. Lot of vitamins in Geritol. Sometimes I wake up with a headache, which is probably due to all the vitamins, What do you have to say to that?
I just saw the account of retired Parkland Hospital nurse Phyllis J. Hall's account ("JFK Shooting Witness: Nurse recalls day president Kennedy was Shot in Dallas.)"of the arrival of JFK where she says she saw the bullet laying on the gurney next to the President. (@ 2:07 of her interview)
Try to microscopically analyze and photograph the bullet and shell casing evidence to identify every identifying initial scratched into the metal. For example, there's a controversy over whether CE399 has SS Agent Elmer Todd's initials scratched into it.
@@Namratiug Yeah, we know the drill: any evidence points at Oswald, it's all been faked, any witnesses point at Oswald, they're all liars, any investigators point at Oswald, they're all conspirators...
4:43 if it's important enough to come here, we need to preserve it for all time.....but i'll touch it with my filthy oily human hands so it decomposes faster.......wtf????
Archival technicians touch objects with their bare hands because gloves reduce tactile sensation, which can result in damage accidentally being done. Protocols are in place at most conservation institutes regarding hands being thoroughly cleaned before handling, however gloves are rarely if ever used.
peter phoenix all the evidence is phony,contrived anyway...It was a coup with LBJ knowledge...too much has been produced to blame Russia or Cubans.....mafia would be in coordination with the govt. no mystery.
I sometimes have a bit of morbid humor when I discuss this event with others. I tell them that no one even bothered to tell me about it; at that point in my life, all I cared about was me; I didn't care about what happened to the president. And just when I get that "How can you be so heartless" look, I say when one is only two months old, that would be understanding and maybe even forgivable!!
As a conservator I think they know when it's necessary to wear gloves and when not to. Besides gloves can to some materials can cause more damage than good.
What? Learn spelling and how to be coherent then try again. That should only take you a few years. And you have worn out lol-why is this funny to you? Stupid right wing jackass.
That`s a question many people ask. After reading about that era, I think he kept his mouth shut because any serious investigation would expose certain unflattering facts about the JFK administration,such as attempts by the US government to assasinate foreign leaders during that time. He was protecting his brother`s legacy.Perhaps one of the reasons RFK ran for president in 68 was because,if elected, he could use the powers of the presidency to get the truth while not exposeing embarrising information.
A specialist not wearing gloves to manipulate old documents or items is a big no-no
The rifle isn't famous it's "infamous"...
The word infamous was used in the three amigos. It applies here.
what was that pic of a windshield all about?
"And this um......is the famous rifle....um...that... (slight pause)....that Oswald used".......I wonder why that came out a little awkward?
Is this lady taking part in The Creation and Maintenance of Public Myths? (see Philip D Zelikow)
Or is it the kind of lady that you could give mind blowing revelations in Disneyland?
I think she knows more, but wants to keep her job.
When you try a lot of criminal cases, you get a sense of body language and speech that only the pressure cooker of a witness stand can produce. It becomes easily obvious when someone is lying ot telling the truth by how they say something, not what they say.
probably since the reporter or whoever is saying it is traumatized by the assassination
Stfu
He's dead. The how and why do not matter to me. Nothing we will learn will change the events that occurred that day.
Great to see That all this effort to preserve items that did NOT KILL KENNEDY. Oswald was a clear patsy, very unfortunate for him.
There's a mountain of evidence for Oswald's guilt.
Imagine finding the list of people whom have signed non disclosures with regard to national "security" matters. We could piece a lot of loose ends together knowing who can't tell the truth about stuff.
4:37 The transfer but there is no time on it that I see. 4:46 the blanket the rifle was wrapped in?
Why is she touching this with her bare hands.
Moments In Time As an archivist I think she knows best
Generally speaking, when dealing with archival materials you’re better off using your bare hands. Handling an item with gloves reduces tactile sensation of the object and can result in inadvertent damage.
@@joshvoyles7870 spot on. I've held items from 1820s in this way, far older and more risky than this. Thoroughly washed hands is pretty much a rule for this now but as you say, far more control and less risk using uncovered hands.
I trust no one handling archival items that have no true love for history - why handle it in the first place? It doesn't need handling at all. Worse than those WIlliamsburg history yo-yos.
She get sexually off to touching it bare handed..... clearly...
She needed to learn the word ALLEGED.. Unless there was a Secret Trial that she's privy to, Oswald, as far as I know, was never convicted in a Court of Law for killing JFK or Tippet!! Oswald's family can Sue them for Slandering his name..
yes he was
"Slandering the name" of a guy caught red-handed trying to shoot a cop...
She still didn't answer why it's important to her that they be preserved.
Oswald should be pardoned for a crime he never committed.
I say it was the driver because in the film it looked like he pulled out a gun and shot him! Oswald was innocent
@@todoroki2134 Yes, Agent Greer, knowing he was surrounded by witnesses and people filming him, turned into the faces of a carful of passengers inches away, shot Kennedy in the face, and then blamed Oswald for it. lol
Oswald, of course, has an avalanche of hard evidence for his guilt.
Why is he not wearing white gloves with that map? Doesn't anyone know about human oils onto paper?
Who gives a fuck
@@smokeskanteallday4094 alot of people really
More is seen now that it is better to have thoroughly washed your hands to handle objects than wear gloves as it means you have more control on the item with less risk of damaging the item using gloves. I've held book items from the 1820s in this way which are far less stable due to their age.
Seriously, here's what every 'archivist' is telling you when they unnecessarily handle historic items. "I can touch this and you can't because you're untrustworthy."
An old Russian rifle that snipers had told that it was impossible to reload and keep a moving target in sight, beside that Oswald was not a bull eye. Experts say that a same model rifle was used but it was modified to semi automatic and a real sniper was the shooter. Oswald was sacrifice lamb. He shot his rifle to make it looks that it was the weapon.
lie
It was “Italian” not Russian.
CE-399 is a lie.
They took more fragments from Connelly’s wrist than is missing from the “single bullet”
The handling and firing of that particular weapon will vary from shooter to shooter.
Rubbish.
i wonder if at the time they took that rifle apart and dusted every part for Oswalds finger prints and even the shell casings ....
yes
Oswald never fired a shot that day.
Nope. He fired 7. Three were aimed at Kennedy and four at Officer Tippett.
Of course he did !
Investigators: *says something about JF Kennedy's assassination*
40 year old uncles: impossible
if that's the weapon that was used and they still have it then how come it's in the building that Oswald was
The one in the TSBD museum is a replica, ya dope.
the "original" Zapruder film... haha that film was altered as soon as they got their hands on it...
Film was in custody, secured, processed, copied, distributed and viewed by investigators and media representatives way too fast to have been altered.
I am not an expert on hand writing, but you can clearly see , that 2 different hand writing is going on here, i believe it's either Marinas handwriting & why i think that is because back then in the USSR, you did not have a normal ball point pen, but a fountain pen. Which you can see also different things or items written down don't match up at all, it is normally every letter is always written in the same way, especially the Y's, Numbers, G's etc etc.
Also they don't mention anything about the 2 rifles they have & that they are both the same type of rifle, but 1 is longer than the other & also the FBI put metal shims under the scope just to make it accurate to test fire, which i believe they used that reason, then to say here's the bullets that were recovered from inside the car.
Lol she said preserve history meanwhile she's perpetuating the lie.
My thoughts exactly Rob
No, she's perpetuating what hard, credible and demonstrable evidence demonstrates.
if Oswald's guilty and he shot 3 times who shot the 4 other shots there's proof of ? those are really Magic Bullets !!!
and ewe never explained that lol
Explains the importance of preserving artifacts after handing one with no gloves.....
0:31 One of the clearest images I've ever seen of the single bullet, putting the lie to the claims made by many authors that the bullet was "nearly pristine." Actually it's not even close to pristine; the base of the bullet is severely flattened.
But the bullet really was, magic. It was in Connally's leg and found on his stretcher, at the same time! ua-cam.com/video/D-CDLl82n-E/v-deo.html
Have you seen a bullet that has actually hit some bones.....it is relatively pristine.
Strange things happen but the list of strange things is in itself strange.
@@peartree460 ok , baby steps
1 , buy the same rifle & ammo
2, fire it through NON uniform ballistic gel & see that air spaces deflect things
3, line up 2 ballistic torsos, the way JFK & Connolly were REALLY positioned & fire
4, then you are allowed to be arrogant
@@WapTek123 how is what i said in any way arrogant?
Ive seen the test you outlined done several times by both sides of the debate...never seen the slug pristine after.
Ever.
Maybe look up the word arrogant...from my 5th grade vocabulary test.
☝️ now that is arrogant 😎
You clearly have no idea how bullets work or look before or after being fired 😂
Good try you simmmmmmp
I drink geritol to take the place of alcohol. I usually drink 5 bottles a day, and by night fall I sleep like a baby. Lot of vitamins in Geritol. Sometimes I wake up with a headache, which is probably due to all the vitamins, What do you have to say to that?
a flibbity flabbity floo .
I just saw the account of retired Parkland Hospital nurse Phyllis J. Hall's account ("JFK Shooting Witness: Nurse recalls day president Kennedy was Shot in Dallas.)"of the arrival of JFK where she says she saw the bullet laying on the gurney next to the President. (@ 2:07 of her interview)
57 years later and the majority feel Oswald was the “fall guy”. By now it is forever a mystery. ❓❓❓
This is the...(which Oswald used to assassinate the President) - she says in an undertone intonation as a side-remark.
Well, who needs "evidence" when you have "feelings?"
If JFK was still with us, he would be 105.
To C-SPAN: Thank you for making this video available.
Might as well take a dump and hand it to the people
the national archives has the gun logged as a Mannlicher???
Since that's what it is, yes.
@@Caeruleo no it isn't.
@@dustyflair Oh, you've got proof that the rifle shown in the video is not a Mannlicher-Carcano?
@@Caeruleo geez, you're not very bright, are you? It is an ITILIAN CARCANO....There us no such gun is a mannlicher carcano
@@dustyflair You know full well the Mauser story is crackpot rubbish.
Try to microscopically analyze and photograph the bullet and shell casing evidence to identify every identifying initial scratched into the metal. For example, there's a controversy over whether CE399 has SS Agent Elmer Todd's initials scratched into it.
" controversy" that CE399 has ET on it ,,, wow
Good History Video
This is FALSE HISTORY video!
mrfester42 Okay
The only truth in the video was yes, JFK was shot.
3:10 Fuck that. You go there and they show you a picture? Why not display cases like other museums?
Oswald did not kill JFK. Please start again with an actual investigation. TY for coming to my TED talk.
yes he did
Of course he did !
@@prinzessindianavonbaden787 You have no idea what you are talking about.
@@Namratiug Yeah, we know the drill: any evidence points at Oswald, it's all been faked, any witnesses point at Oswald, they're all liars, any investigators point at Oswald, they're all conspirators...
A facetious thanks to all who have polluted an otherwise interesting discussion.
so called magic nothing
He was shot by an 6.5×52mm Italian Carcano M91/38 bolt-action rifle it uses an rimless bottle-necked rifle cartridge
4:43 if it's important enough to come here, we need to preserve it for all time.....but i'll touch it with my
filthy oily human hands so it decomposes faster.......wtf????
Archival technicians touch objects with their bare hands because gloves reduce tactile sensation, which can result in damage accidentally being done. Protocols are in place at most conservation institutes regarding hands being thoroughly cleaned before handling, however gloves are rarely if ever used.
peter phoenix all the evidence is phony,contrived anyway...It was a coup with LBJ knowledge...too much has been produced to blame Russia or Cubans.....mafia would be in coordination with the govt. no mystery.
Cool history
Oswald didn't fire a shot on November 22, 1963....
A mountain of hard evidence says otherwise.
The cia bullet
Why isn't she wearing white cotton gloves?
Oliver Stone is a crank who made a horrible movie on JFK.
I sometimes have a bit of morbid humor when I discuss this event with others. I tell them that no one even bothered to tell me about it; at that point in my life, all I cared about was me; I didn't care about what happened to the president. And just when I get that "How can you be so heartless" look, I say when one is only two months old, that would be understanding and maybe even forgivable!!
Anyone else have trouble understanding her? Kind of mumbles
No white gloves.
As a conservator I think they know when it's necessary to wear gloves and when not to. Besides gloves can to some materials can cause more damage than good.
Bullet says Q1...🤔
Why I clicked on this. Maybe why the The Plan is called Q?
(Highest security is also called Q)
All stuff for a fairy tale
C span lies...the Kennedy Oz enigma was Disney Kennedy team up like today with Donald and Mikey.
this is all false! Oswald never drew a map in his book lol what lies the rifel? there were 3 car cannot lol which Bulls hit
one are they using now?
What? Learn spelling and how to be coherent then try again. That should only take you a few years. And you have worn out lol-why is this funny to you? Stupid right wing jackass.
Are you Dyslexic ?
Is there a google translate to moron?
Best hoax ever. Just as good as a Hollywood film..
To bad about all the Disney Associates..
I laughed when the wizard of Oz killed Kennedy...
This eoman is a fucking clueless idiot.
No comment
Fake
You're probably right.
What an idiotic "evidences" story.
Disney proves that it can fix elections with Donald and Mikey...
@@ianmichalski7997 of course it is genius..
You people are so stupid for media's lies...you trust liars .. hahahahahaha...
PUT SOME GLOVES ON
How could Bobby Kennedy so stupid that he didn't stand up for his brother right away
Felipe Gonzalez probably because he was scared they'd kill him too, and he was right.
That`s a question many people ask. After reading about that era, I think he kept his mouth shut because any serious investigation would expose certain unflattering facts about the JFK administration,such as attempts by the US government to assasinate foreign leaders during that time. He was protecting his brother`s legacy.Perhaps one of the reasons RFK ran for president in 68 was because,if elected, he could use the powers of the presidency to get the truth while not exposeing embarrising information.
Possibly because the hard and credible evidence firmly demonstrates Oswald shot the President and he did it on his own.
Disney proves how it can fix elections with Mikey and Donald...
Disney best lie was the Kennedy assassination by Oz... homage to CS Lewis and Aldous Huxley..